Fluoride release, weight loss and erosive wear of modern aesthetic restoratives.

OBJECTIVE: In this investigation, the in vitro sustained fluoride release, weight loss and erosive wear of three conventional glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX, ChemFil Superior, Ketac-Silver), three resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil), a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract), and a resin composite control material (Z100) were compared. METHODS: The amounts of fluoride released and weight changes were measured for 12 weeks using a fluoride electrode with TISAB III buffer. After 12 weeks, the specimens were recharged with fluoride using 2 mL of 1.23% APF gel. The recharged specimens were assessed for the amounts of fluoride released and weight changes over another 12 weeks. At the end of the experiment, the specimens were examined with SEM and surface profilometry. RESULTS: All materials, with the exception of Z100, showed the highest initial fluoride release rates during the first 2 days, dropping quickly over 2 weeks and becoming largely stabilised after 5 weeks, in an exponential mode. The recharging of the specimens with APF gel caused a large increase in the amounts of fluoride released during the first 2 days only. Analyses for all cements showed strong correlations between mean weight loss and cumulative fluoride release over a 5-week period following the application of the APF gel. SEM and surface profilometry found that roughness increased from the polyacid-modified resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. CONCLUSIONS: APF gel caused erosive wear of the glass ionomer cements especially, and the wear correlated well with the weight losses. To minimise surface erosion, APF gel should not be used on these cements, especially as the recharging effects are transitory.     

Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.

The objective of this study was to assess the surface roughness of eight esthetic restorative materials and the relationship with weight changes during fluoride release and uptake. Five specimens each of ChemFil Superior, Fuji IX Dyract, Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Z100 (control) were prepared and immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The changes in specimen weight and fluoride release were monitored for 12 weeks. This protocol was repeated after recharging the specimens with 1.23% APF gel for 12 more weeks. The immersed and fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. There was a significant weight loss for all glass ionomer cements following APF gel application (P < 0.01), which correlated with fluoride release (r = 0.89-0.98). Mean roughness (Ra) measurements and SEM showed that roughness increased from the resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. The marked erosive effect of APF gel on glass ionomer restorations could increase surface colonization by plaque micro-organisms, and reduce the longevity of the restorations.     

Effects of temperature on the fluoride release and recharging ability of glass ionomers

This study investigated the effects of environmental temperature on the fluoride release and recharging ability of glass ionomers. Five disk specimens (15 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) were made of each of the following materials: a conventional luting glass ionomer, two high viscosity restorative glass ionomers and a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer. The fluoride release of each material was measured at 4 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 55 degrees C. An additional three groups, which were made of the same materials, were stored in distilled and deionized water for 30 days and recharged in 250 ppm fluoride solution at 4 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 55 degrees C for five minutes. The fluoride re-release was measured daily from two days prior to two days after the recharging process. At all temperatures, the luting glass ionomers showed the greatest fluoride release and recharging ability, followed by the resin-modified glass ionomer, then the high viscosity glass ionomers. For each material, the fluoride release increased with increasing temperature and all glass ionomers showed greater recharging ability at higher temperatures. An increase in environmental temperature increased both the fluoride release and recharging of the glass ionomers. This may be important in developing regimes for improving the delivery of topical fluoride products.     

四种玻璃离子充填材料释氟性与溶解性的研究

目的 比较4种玻璃离子充填材料短期内氟离子释放能力和溶解性,为临床选择充填材料提供依据.方法 实验选取1种传统型玻璃离子水门汀(SC),2种高强度玻璃离子水门汀FujiⅨ(F9)和Ketac Moler(KM),1种树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀FujiIILC (F2LC),和1种复合树脂Z100( CR,3M)共5种材...     

Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid

The amounts and the pattern of fluoride release from one metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement, two resin-modified glass ionomer cements, one compomer, and one composite resin placed in double-distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid were evaluated in this study. Measurements of fluoride ion release were made for a total of 105 cylindrical specimens (10 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in height). They were taken over a period of 16 weeks at the intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, as well as 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. The pattern of fluoride release was similar for all of the examined materials. The greatest amount of fluoride was released from the metal-reinforced glass ionomer Argion. The resin-modified glass ionomers Vitremer, Fuji II LC; the compomer Dyract; and the composite resin Tetric followed in ranking order. The pH of the environment strongly affected the fluoride release from the materials. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the amounts of fluoride released in lactic acid vs water and artificial saliva, whereas, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the amounts of fluoride released in water vs artificial saliva.     

Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the fluoride recharging and releasing abilities of resin-based materials containing fluoridated glass filler to determine whether the extent of the glass-ionomer matrix of the material affects these properties. METHODS: Three materials having a different proportion of the hydrogel matrix surrounding the glass filler, namely: Reactmer paste, Dyract AP and Xeno CF, were used for this study. Five disk specimens of each material were placed into distilled/deionized water and the fluoride release measured during 38 days. For fluoride recharge the disks were exposed to 250 ppm F solution for 1 h and the pre- and post-recharge fluoride release were determined using an ion-selective electrode (total fluoride ions) and ion chromatography (free fluoride ions). RESULTS: The amounts of total and free fluoride release from each material at the initial period in descending order were Reactmer paste > Dyract AP > Xeno CF (p < 0.05 ANOVA and Scheffe's test). After fluoride recharge, Reactmer paste showed a greater amount of fluoride release than the other materials. Dyract AP and Xeno CF showed a similar total level of fluoride release after recharging. For Xeno CF the amount of total fluoride released after recharging was significantly greater than that of free fluoride, but there was no significant difference between total and free fluoride released after recharging for Dyract AP (p = 0.05 paired t-test). SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggested that the extent of the glass-ionomer matrix of the glass filler played an important role for fluoride-releasing and recharging abilities of the resin-based materials.     

Effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release by glass ionomer-based restoratives

It is well documented that glass ionomer cements absorb and release fluoride following single fluoride exposures. This study examined fluoride release among three glass ionomer-based restorative materials following multiple daily exposures to three topical fluoride regimens. Using a Delrin mold, 32 cylindrical specimens, each of a glass ionomer (Ketac-Fil), resin-modified glass ionomer (Photac-Fil) and polyacid-modified resin (Dyract AP) were created. Each specimen was subjected to one of four daily treatments (n = 8): (1) no fluoride treatment (control); (2) application of a fluoride dentifrice (1000 ppm) for one minute once daily; (3) application of the same dentifrice for one minute twice daily; (4) the same regimen as (3), plus immersion in a 0.05% sodium fluoride (NaF) mouth rinse (225 ppm) for one minute immediately following the second dentifrice application. Each specimen was suspended in a polyethylene test tube containing 1.0 ml demineralizing solution (pH 4.3) at 37 degrees C for six hours, then transferred to a new test tube containing 1.0 ml remineralizing solution (pH 7.0) at 37 degrees C for 18 hours. Fluoride treatments were completed at the time of transfer daily for seven days. Media solutions were buffered with equal volumes of TISAB II; fluoride levels were measured using a digital ion analyzer and fluoride electrode. Fluoride release decreased significantly from Day 1 to Day 3 for all materials regardless of fluoride treatment (Repeated Measures ANOVA, Tukey HSD, p < 0.05). All specimens released significantly more fluoride in demineralizing solution than in remineralizing solution. For Days 2-7, Treatment 4 produced greater fluoride release than both the control and Treatment 2 for all three materials (p < 0.05); For each material, the fluoride release produced by Treatments 3 and 4 was statistically similar on most days throughout the study. By Day 7, Photac-Fil demonstrated both the greatest total fluoride release and the greatest rechargability, followed by Ketac-Fil and Dyract AP. Although subsequent daily fluoride release never approached that of Day 1, increasing daily fluoride exposures enhanced fluoride release for all three restorative materials.     

一种复合体和四种树脂化玻璃离子水门汀的氟离子释放测定

目的 比较１种复合体和４种树脂化玻璃离子水门汀在水中释放氟离子的能力。方法 用氟离子选择电极，分别在第１、７、３０ｄ直径２５３ｄ，５种材料固化后标本浸泡训的氟离子浓度。结果 除复合体以外的所有材料，均显示了高的初期氟离子释入并急剧下降，然后缓慢下降。结论 复合体释放的氟离子比树脂化玻璃离子水门汀少。对于龋病高发的患者，选择高氟离子释放的树脂化玻璃离子水门汀材料较好。     

Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

OBJECTIVES: The physical properties of the resin-modified composite resin Dyract (Detrey Dentsply) and the resin-modified glass ionomer cement Fuji II LC (GC) were compared, and the effect of water sorption on these properties was studied. METHODS: Compressive, diametral compressive and flexural strengths were measured using specimens aged up to three months. The Vickers hardness and the water erosion were also determined. The specimens were stored at 37 degrees C under five different conditions, chosen to vary the water sorption of the samples. The results were analyzed using a multi-factor analysis of variance. RESULTS: Dry specimens of Dyract and Fuji II LC showed similar properties. However, the two materials behaved differently when stored in presence of water. In contrast to Fuji II LC, Dyract showed very little expansion for the first 24 h (1.5 +/- 0.3 and 0.03 +/- 0.01%, respectively), leached small quantities of ions and retained its mechanical strength. Those differences are related to their chemical composition. Fuji II LC is hydrophilic, as it contains polyHEMA. In the presence of water, Fuji II LC behaves like a hydrogel, but the network resulting from the copolymerization of acidic and UDMA monomers is less hydrophilic, and the effect of water on Dyract is retarded. SIGNIFICANCE: The significant properties of Dyract are determined by its composite character. This certainly represents some advantages, for instance, a higher mechanical strength, a better protection against initial dehydration and subsequent water effects. However, Dyract shows some disadvantages over Fuji II LC, like a lower amount of fluoride release or the interference of oxygen during polymerization.     

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth

The aims of the present study were to measure the fluoride release of 1 glass ionomer cement, 1 cermet cement, 3 resin-modified glass ionomer cements and 1 compomer, and to determine the influence of each material on bacterial growth. Test specimens were eluted in saline for 180 days. Every 2 days, the specimens were transferred into fresh saline and the fluoride content of the solution was measured. Furthermore, 48-h, 14-d, 90-d, and 180-d eluates were inoculated with Streptococcus mutans and bacterial growth was recorded nephelometrically. Fluoride release dropped significantly over time for each material with values between 6.2 (Ketac-Silver) and 29.3 (Photac-Fil) ppm after 48 h to values between 0.6 (Ketac-Silver) and 1.7 (Ketac-Fil, Vitremer) ppm after 180 days. Each material reduced bacterial growth at each time of examination, but the effect decreased significantly over time with a maximum growth of 71.7% (Ketac-Fil) to 85.6% (Ketac-Silver) after 48 h and 94.7 (Vitremer) to 99.0% (Ketac-Silver) after 180 days (growth control = 100%). Both Ketac-Silver and Dyract showed a significantly lower inhibiting effect on bacterial growth than the other materials. The tested materials showed a good correlation between fluoride release and influence on bacterial growth. However, both effects dropped dramatically over the 180-days period.     

In vitro fluoride release from aesthetic restorative materials following recharging with APF gel

In this in vitro study, the fluoride ion release from three more-viscous conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs)--ChemFlex, Fuji IX GP, Ionofil Molar--four polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers)--Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Freedom, F2000--and a hybrid resin composite--Ariston pHc--were compared. The amounts of fluoride release from 3 x 2.7 mm specimens were measured over six weeks using a fluoride ion-selective electrode. After six weeks, the specimens were recharged with 2 ml of 1.23 per cent acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel for four minutes. The recharged specimens were then assessed for the amounts of fluoride release over another six weeks. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA. The GICs and Compoglass F showed significantly higher initial fluoride release rates during the first two days (p < 0.05). After the first two days, fluoride release rates from all materials dropped quickly and became essentially stabilized within three-five weeks, in an exponential mode. The recharging of the specimens with APF gel caused a brief, but significant, increase in fluoride release for all materials (p < 0.05), before decreasing to previous comparable rates. Compoglass F released relatively more fluoride, and Ariston pHc relatively less, after APF gel application than before. The lowest total amounts over the study were released by Dyract AP and Freedom. The newer compomers, as well as the newer more-viscous GICs, appear to act as fluoride reservoirs to varying extents.     

Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is considerable variation in generic formulation and in reported fluoride release from resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements. PURPOSE: This study compared fluoride release from 2 generically similar resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements (Vitremer and Advance) with release from 2 conventional glass ionomer luting cements (Ketac-Cem and Fuji I). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten specimen disks of each of the 4 luting cements were fabricated and immersed in deionized water in individual polystyrene jars. The jars were stored in a humidor at 37 degrees C between test periods. At the same time each day, for 28 days, fluoride release from each specimen disk was measured in parts per million by testing the storage water. RESULTS: The 4 luting cements tested showed an initial high concentration of fluoride release during the first week, followed by a gradual decrease over the study period. Vitremer luting cement demonstrated the greatest mean cumulative fluoride release in parts per million over the study period (198), followed by Fuji I (140), Ketac-Cem (110), and Advance (99) luting cements. CONCLUSIONS: Resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements showed fluoride release comparable to the conventional glass ionomer luting cements. Vitremer luting cement released more fluoride over the 28-day period than the other cements.     

Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements

The aim of the present study was to study the effect of fluoride gel treatment on fluoride release and inhibition of acid production of Streptococcus mutans by different glass ionomer cements. Test slabs of four glass ionomer materials were fitted into the bottom of a test tube. A layer of S. mutans cells was centrifuged onto the test slabs, and the specimens were incubated for 4 h in 1.7% sucrose solution. Incubations were made using fresh, aged (29 d), aged and F-treated (1.25% F-gel), and aged, F-treated and aged samples ( n = 15 per group). After each incubation, pH and F contents of the fluid phase were determined. The freshly mixed glass ionomer samples released large amounts of fluoride, and the pH fall in the fluid phase was significantly inhibited. For aged samples, the fluoride release decreased strongly and no inhibitory effect on acid production by S. mutans was seen. After application of fluoride gel, fluoride release and inhibitory effect were significantly higher than initially for all glass ionomer cements. In conclusion, all glass ionomer cements were able to take up fluoride and subsequently release it, which resulted in reestablishment of their antibacterial effect. The patterns of fluoride release and antibacterial action were virtually the same for conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements.     

Cytotoxicity of resin-based restorative materials on human pulp cell cultures

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the cytocompatibility of 5 different extracts of resin-based restorative materials (2 resin-modified glass ionomer cements, 1 compomer, and 2 composite resins) on human pulp cells. STUDY DESIGN: Set specimens from 2 resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji II LC and Fuji IX), 1 compomer (Dyract), and 2 composite resins (Tetric and Superfil) were eluted with culture medium for 2 and 5 days. The effects of resin-based restorative materials on human pulp cells were evaluated with cytotoxicity and mitochondrial activity assays. RESULTS: The results showed that the eluates from resin-modified glass-ionomer, compomer, and composite resins were cytotoxic to primary human pulp cells. In addition, Superfil, Fuji IX, and Tetric demonstrated an inhibitory effect on mitochondrial activity of human pulp cells. It was found that composite resin Superfil was the most toxic restorative material among the chemicals tested. CONCLUSION: The influence of the cytotoxicity depended on the materials tested. Compomer or light-curing resin-modified glass ionomer may initially react more favorably to pulp cells.     

Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials

Objectives. The objective of the study was to evaluate initial curing shrinkage and volumetric change during water storage of six resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Dyract, DeTrey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Int.; Ionosit Fil, DMG; VariGlass VLC, DeTrey Dentsply; Vitremer, 3M Dental Products; Photac-Fil, ESPE), a hybrid composite (blend-a-lux, Blendax) and a chemical-cured glass ionomer cement (ChemFil Superior, DeTrey Dentsply).Methods. The curing shrinkage was determined 5 min and 24 h after polymerization and mixing, respectively. Volumetric changes were examined after 14 d and 28 d water storage. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes were evaluated using the hydrostatic principle. In addition, the total water content of the materials was measured after 28 d water storage.Results. Curing shrinkage of most of the resin-modified glass ionomers was greater than the hybrid composite and the chemical-cured glass ionomer cement. After a 28 d water storage, the resin-modified glass ionomers showed volumetric expansion and the chemical-cured glass ionomer showed volumetric loss. All of the examined glass ionomer materials had a higher total water content than the composite.Significance. The large curing shrinkage of the resin-modified glass ionomer materials measured in this in vitro study could affect the marginal integrity of glass ionomer restorations.     

Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material

This study compared the surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material (Reactmer) over time to four different types of existing materials. The latter included a composite (Spectrum TPH), a compomer (Dyract AP) and conventional (Fuji II) and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Fuji II LC). Six specimens of each material were fabricated and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for one week. The materials were subsequently finished with a series of Sof-Lex contouring and polishing disks. The average surface roughness (Ra, microm) of each specimen was measured at three days and three months by a surface profilometer. Storage medium was distilled water at 37 degrees C during the hiatus periods. Data was analyzed by ANOVA/Scheffe's and independent samples t-tests at significance level 0.05. At both time periods, Fuji II and Fuji II LC were significantly rougher than Spectrum, Dyract and Reactmer. For all materials, surface roughness at three days was not significantly different from that at three months. The surface finish of the giomer (Reactmer) was significantly better than conventional/resin-modified glass ionomer cements and comparable to the composite and compomer evaluated. The quality of surface finish for all materials was not significantly affected by long-term storage in water.     

Fluoride release in vitro from a resin-modified glass ionomer after exposure to NaF solutions and toothpastes

The aims of the present investigation were: (i) to study the release of fluoride from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer) after exposing ("recharging") the material with NaF toothpastes and NaF solutions with different fluoride concentrations, and (ii) to study the effect of covering the material with a sealant layer (glaze) in this respect. Totally 160 specimens were made, which were placed in water for 13 weeks to receive a low fluoride release value. The specimens were then randomly divided into 10 groups with 16 discs each. Five of the groups were exposed once a day for 7 days to one of the following fluoride agents: 0.05, 0.2 or 2% NaF solutions and slurries of two NaF toothpastes (Acta and Pepsodent). The other five groups received the same treatment twice a day. All treatments had a recharging effect. However, the 2% NaF solution resulted in significantly more fluoride release than the other solutions and toothpastes. Treatment twice a day gave higher total release than once a day, but the difference were only significant for the 0.2 and 2% NaF solutions. With glaze material covering the specimens, almost no fluoride release was observed. However, when the glaze was removed, a burst of fluoride occurred.     

In vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of esthetic restorative materials in bovine teeth under severe cariogenic challenge

Considering that caries around restorations is a serious problem in dentistry, and some restorative materials with fluoride may be important in inhibiting these lesions, this research is aimed at performing an in vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of some esthetic restorative materials. Standardized cavities were prepared in the center of either intact blocks of bovine enamel or with bovine teeth containing early artificial carious lesions. The specimens were restored with a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (Molar Ketac), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer), a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) and a conventional resin composite (Z-250). In addition to the restored specimens, four corresponding control groups were evaluated. All groups, except for two control groups, were subjected to a demineralization/remineralization cycling model for 14 days, simulating a situation of severe cariogenic challenge. The blocks were then longitudinally sectioned through the restorations. Mineral loss was evaluated in these specimens using the Knoop microhardness profiles in longitudinal sections at three different distances of the cavities and at eight distinct depths in relation to the external enamel surface. Statistical analysis of the results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) among the groups, although none of the study materials completely inhibited creation of the lesions. Vitremer demonstrated the best cariostatic action in intact bovine enamel. Ketac Molar, in intact or demineralized enamel, and Vitremer, in demineralized enamel, presented intermediate cariostatic potential. Z-250 and Dyract AP did not demonstrate any cariostatic effect. The data suggests that glass ionomer cements demonstrated better cariostatic action compared to the other restorative materials.     

Effects of APF gel on the physical structure of compomers and glass ionomer cements

This study assessed the effect of an acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on the surfaces of eight modern esthetic restorative materials. Five specimens each of three high powder: liquid ratio conventional glass ionomer cements (ChemFlex, Fuji IX GP, Ionofil Molar), four polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) (Compoglass F, Dyract AP, Freedom, F2000) and an alkaline glass filled resin composite (Ariston pHc) were prepared and immersed at 37 degrees C in 2 mL of artificial saliva for six weeks. The aged specimens were then coated with 1.23% APF gel for four minutes, rinsed and again immersed in artificial saliva for another six weeks. The immersed, fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. After APF gel application, mean surface roughness (Ra) measurements and SEMs showed that roughness increased significantly, generally from the resin composite and compomers to the conventional glass ionomer cements (p < 0.05).     

Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement

This study compared the amount and pattern of fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer-based material (nano-ionomer) with other restorative materials and correlated the surface area to volume of nano-sized filler with its capacity to release fluoride in the powder, more quickly increasing the fluoride. The materials evaluated were a nano-ionomer (Ketac N 100), a conventional glass-ionomer cement (GC Fuji II), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GC Fuji II LC), a compomer (Dyract F) and a fluoride-releasing resin composite (Tetric N Flow). A resin composite (Synergy Flow) served as the control. Ten specimens were fabricated from each of these materials using a customized metal mold. The fluoride release was measured every 24 hours for the first seven days, and on days 14, 21 and 28, a combination fluoride ion—selective electrode connected to an ion analyzer. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (p=0.05). An initial fluoride “burst effect” was seen with all of the materials, except for the control and compomer. The conventional glass-ionomer cement showed the highest fluoride release on the first three days. The nano-ionomer showed the maximum release of fluoride for the remaining days. A low constant level of fluoride release was seen from the compomer and fluoride-releasing resin composite throughout the study period.