Clinically distinct characteristics in patients younger than 40 years old with non-cardiac chest pain

Background and Aim: Little is known about non‐cardiac chest pain (NCCP) in young patients. We aimed to examine the proportion of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in young patients with NCCP compared to the average‐aged NCCP patients and to evaluate their symptomatic characteristics and the clinical efficacy of a 2‐week proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial. Methods: Ninety‐six patients with NCCP ≥ 1/week were classified into the young‐aged (≤ 40 years, n = 38) and the average‐aged groups (> 40 years, n = 58). Typical reflux symptoms were assessed. The patients were defined into a GERD group and non‐GERD group according to reflux esophagitis on esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or pathologic acid exposure on 24‐h esophageal pH monitoring. Then the patients were treated with 30 mg of lansoprazole bid for 14 days. Results: Nine patients (23%) in the young‐aged group and 22 patients (38%) in average‐aged group were diagnosed with GERD‐related NCCP (P = 0.144). The proportion of typical reflux symptoms was higher in the GERD group compared with the non‐GERD group in both age groups. A PPI test improved symptoms in the GERD group irrespective of age, but this improvement was not observed in non‐GERD group. Conclusions: In young NCCP patients, the prevalence of GERD was relatively low compared to average‐aged NCCP, but the difference was insignificant. The PPI test was very effective in diagnosing GERD in the NCCP patients in both age groups. Therefore, in young NCCP patients, if there is a negative response to a 2‐week PPI trial, the possibility of extra‐esophageal disease origin needs to be considered.     

Comparison of one-week and two-week empirical trial with a high-dose rabeprazole in non-cardiac chest pain patients

Background:  In patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), the optimal duration of an empirical trial with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of one-week and two-week PPI trial in patients with weekly or more than weekly NCCP and to determine its optimal duration for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related NCCP.
Methods:  Forty-two patients with at least weekly NCCP were enrolled. The baseline symptoms were assessed using a daily symptom diary for seven days. Also, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring were performed for the diagnosis of GERD. Then, patients were treated with rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 14 days. To assess NCCP improvement during the PPI trial, the first week and the second week symptom diary were kept for 1–7 and 8–14 days. The PPI test was considered positive if a symptom score improved (50% compared to the baseline.
Results:  There was no significant difference for a positive PPI test between GERD-related NCCP group ( n  = 8, 50%) and non GERD-related NCCP group ( n  = 6, 23%) during the first week of the PPI test. However, during the second week, GERD-related NCCP had a higher positive PPI test ( n  = 13, 81%) than non GERD-related NCCP ( n  = 7, 27%) ( P  = 0.001) with a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 62%, respectively.
Conclusions:  The rabeprazole empirical trial was diagnostic for patients with GERD-related NCCP, and its optimal duration was determined to be at least two weeks.     

¿Cuál es la utilidad del test de inhibidores de la bomba de protones en el dolor torácico no cardíaco?

Background and aims

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) often represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Given that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common cause of NCCP, initial treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) has been proposed for all patients (PPI testing), reserving esophageal function testing solely for non-responders. The aim of the present study was to provide evidence on the clinical utility of PPI testing with high-dose pantoprazole in patients with NCCP.

Patients and methods

We carried out a study of diagnostic performance with a cohort design in patients with NCCP, who had been assessed by the Cardiology Service. All patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring before PPI testing with pantoprazole 40 mg every 12 h for 1 month. Before and after treatment, we assessed the severity (intensity and frequency) of chest pain, quality of life, and anxiety and depression by means of specific questionnaires. The diagnosis of GERD was based on a pathological finding of esophageal pH monitoring. A positive response to PPI testing was defined as an improvement in chest pain > 50% compared with the baseline score after 1 month of PPI therapy.

Results

We included 30 consecutive patients (17 men/13 women) with a mean age of 49 years. Of these 30 patients, 20 with NCCP had GERD (67%, 95% CI: 47%-83%). A positive response to PPI therapy was observed in 13 of the 30 (43%) patients with NCCP: 11 of the 20 (55%) patients in the GERD-positive group and 2 of the 10 (20%) in the GERD-negative group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PPI testing was 55%, 80%, 85%, 47% and 63%, respectively. A significant reduction in chest pain after pantoprazole therapy (P = .003) and a slight non significant improvement in anxiety and depression was achieved in the GERD-positive group as compared to the GERD-negative group.

Conclusions

In NCCP, PPI testing with pantoprazole has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of GERD, placing in doubt the strategy of reserving functional study to non-responders to antisecretory therapy. Esophageal function testing and accurate diagnosis would allow appropriate targeted therapy for all patients with NCCP.     

食管混合性酸反流和低动力在非心源性胸痛发作的作用研究

目的胃食管反流病（GERD）是引起非心源性胸痛（NCCP）的最常见因素,本研究探讨酸反流和食管动力障碍在NCCP患者中的作用。 方法按照纳入、排除标准选取2018年9月至2019年6月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院急救中心以及微创,疝和腹壁外科住院收治的40例NCCP患者和50例典型GERD症状患者,两组患者均行食管24 h pH监测以及高分辨率食管测压监测。 结果NCCP组食管远端收缩平均积分（DCI）明显低于GERD组,并具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）,提示食管运动功能受损。在NCCP组患者中,与胸痛有关的混合性酸反流明显高于GERD组（P＜0.05）。在NCCP组患者中,与NCCP相关的反流发作在食管5、9和15cm处的反流清除时间比GERD组患者期长（28.3±4.21)s vs(22.6±3.28)s;(13.7±1.32)s vs (18.3±1.47)s;(9.58±1.02)s vs(14.3±1.06)s（P＜0.05）。 结论酸反流性质,食管运动功能受损和延缓反流清除时间与NCCP患者症状发作可能存在密切的关系。     

Acid Perfusion Test: A Useful Test for Evaluating Esophageal Acid Sensitivity

The acid perfusion test (APT) is a test of esophageal acid sensitivity. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the APT has largely been superseded by indexes derived from 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI), and symptom association probability (SAP). To evaluate the role of APT in patients with GERD we compared values of SI, SSI, and SAP in 126 APT+ and 146 APT− patients. Median values for SI, SSI, and SAP were higher in the APT+ compared with the APT− group (P < 0.001). More patients had a positive SI, SSI, and SAP in the APT+ compared with the APT– group (SI, P < 0.0001; SSI and SAP, P < 0.001). Patients with a negative APT were unlikely to have symptoms caused by acid reflux (negative predictive value, 86%). APT may be useful in detecting acid sensitivity in patients who do not report symptoms on 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring.     

Prevalence of upper gastrointestinal tract findings in patients with noncardiac chest pain versus those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms: results from a national endoscopic database

BACKGROUND: Available data on the prevalence of esophageal and upper gut findings in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) are scarce and limited to one center's experience. AIM: To determine the prevalence of esophageal and upper gut mucosal findings in patients undergoing upper endoscopy for NCCP only versus those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms only, using the national Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI) database. METHODS: During the study period, the CORI database received endoscopic reports from a network of 76 community, university, and Veteran Administration Health Care System (VAHCS)/military practice sites. All adult patients who underwent an upper endoscopy for NCCP only or GERD-related symptoms only were identified. Demographic characteristics and prevalence of endoscopic findings were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 3,688 consecutive patients undergoing an upper endoscopy for NCCP and 32,981 for GERD were identified. Normal upper endoscopy was noted in 44.1% of NCCP patients versus 38.8% of those with GERD (P<0.0001). Of the NCCP group, 28.6% had a hiatal hernia (HH), 19.4% erosive esophagitis (EE), 4.4% Barrett's esophagus (BE), and 3.6% stricture/stenosis. However, HH, EE, and BE were significantly more common in the GERD group as compared with the NCCP group (44.8%, 27.8%, and 9.1%, respectively, P<0.0001). In univariate analysis of patients with NCCP, male gender was a risk factor for BE (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.35-2.55, P=0.0001) and being nonwhite was protective (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.86, P=0.02). In this group, male gender was also a risk factor for EE (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54, P=0.001) and age>or=65 yr was protective (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.6-0.89, P=0.002). The NCCP group had a significantly higher prevalence of peptic ulcer in the upper gastrointestinal tract as compared with the GERD group (2.0% vs 1.5%, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this endoscopic prevalence study, most of the endoscopic findings in NCCP were GERD related, but less common as compared with GERD patients.     

Clinical usefulness of subgrouping of patients with non-cardiac chest pain according to characteristic symptoms in Korea

BACKGROUND: Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a heterogeneous disorder. There is controversy about the associations between symptoms and causes in NCCP patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of subgrouping according to characteristic symptoms in NCCP patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were classified into two groups, as patients with typical reflux symptoms (group I, n = 24) and those without typical reflux symptoms (group II, n = 34). They underwent upper endoscopy, manometry, and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. RESULTS: Twenty-four (41%) of the patients were diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at upper endoscopy or 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Eleven (19%) were diagnosed with GERD-associated esophageal motility disorder and 13 (22%) were diagnosed with non-GERD-associated esophageal motility disorder. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, weight, smoking history, history of chronic alcoholism, or the severity, duration and frequency of symptoms. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio of group I for GERD-related NCCP were significantly higher than those of group II. Group I had a higher proportion of patients with GERD-associated esophageal motility disorder (55%) than non-GERD-associated esophageal motility disorder (23%). CONCLUSION: Typical reflux symptoms can be used to distinguish patients with GERD-related NCCP from patients with NCCP, and subgrouping according to characteristic symptoms may assist the diagnosis of these patients in Korea.     

Is proton pump inhibitor testing an effective approach to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with noncardiac chest pain?: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Results of studies evaluating the accuracy of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment as a diagnostic test for GERD-related NCCP have varied. We evaluated the overall accuracy of this modality. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases to May 2004 and included randomized, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the accuracy of findings from PPI testing in the diagnosis of GERD in patients with NCCP. The GERD diagnosis was confirmed by results of endoscopy and/or 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. A summary diagnostic odds ratio and summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to estimate the overall accuracy and to explore any contributing factors. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall sensitivity and specificity of a PPI test were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71%-87%) and 74% (95% CI, 64%-83%), respectively, compared with 19% (95% CI, 12%-29%) and 77% (95% CI, 62%-87%), respectively, in the placebo group. The PPI test showed a significant higher discriminative power, with a summary diagnostic odds ratio of 19.35 (95% CI, 8.54-43.84) compared with 0.61 (95% CI, 0.20-1.86) in the placebo group. The impact of the prevalence of GERD and treatment duration on the accuracy of the test could not be determined because of the lack of an adequate number of studies. CONCLUSION: The use of PPI treatment as a diagnostic test for detecting GERD in patients with NCCP has an acceptable sensitivity and specificity and could be used as an initial approach by primary care physicians to detect GERD in selected patients with NCCP.     

Noncardiac chest pain

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) affects approximately 1 quarter of the adult population in the United States. The pathophysiology of the disorder remains to be fully elucidated. Identified underlying mechanisms for esophageal pain include gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal dysmotility, and visceral hypersensitivity. Aggressive antireflux treatment has been the main therapeutic strategy for GERD-related NCCP. NCCP patients with or without spastic esophageal motor disorders are responsive to pain modulators. The value of botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic treatment for GERD, and antireflux surgery in alleviating NCCP symptoms is limited.     

Pathological bolus exposure plays a significant role in eliciting non-cardiac chest pain

Background and Aim: Pathological bolus exposure is defined in the present study as cases in which all reflux percentage times are above 1.4% of the total reflux number, as revealed by impedance–pH monitoring. The role of pathological bolus exposure in the pathogenesis of non‐cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is poorly known. We aimed to classify and characterize NCCP using combined impedance–pH monitoring. Methods: Seventy‐five consecutive patients with NCCP were prospectively enrolled from January 2006 to October 2008. All the patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)–pH metering. Results: Sixteen patients (21.3%) had esophageal erosion upon endoscopy. Upon esophageal manometry, 37 patients (49.3%) had esophageal dysmotility. When the patients were classified based on MII–pH metering, 16 (21.3%) showed pathological acid exposure, and 40 (53.3%) showed pathological bolus exposure. The DeMeester score of patients with pathological acid exposure was higher than that of patients with pathological bolus exposure (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in age, sex, typical esophageal symptoms, presence of esophageal erosion, esophageal dysmotility, improvement with proton pump inhibitor medication, symptom index ≥50%, percentage of time clearance pH below 4 ≥4%, and all reflux time ≥1.4% in the fasting period between the two groups. When the patients were divided into gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)‐related NCCP and non‐GERD‐related NCCP groups based on MII–pH metering and upper endoscopy, there was no difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Combined impedance–pH monitoring improves the detection and characterization of NCCP. This study suggests that pathological bolus exposure plays a major role in eliciting NCCP.     

Acid reflux detection and symptom-reflux association using 4-day wireless pH recording combining 48-hour periods off and on PPI therapy

OBJECTIVES: Studies have shown that extended pH recording improves the sensitivity of esophageal pH monitoring. Controversy exists as to whether pH studies are optimally done off or on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The aim of this study was to incorporate periods both off and on PPI therapy in a single, extended pH test and describe the effect of PPI therapy on symptom-reflux associations.
METHODS: Sixty patients underwent 4-day pH recordings using two separate receivers calibrated to a single wireless pH capsule. Patients were off PPI therapy for days 1 and 2. Either rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily or omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate 40 mg twice daily were administered on days 3 and 4. Symptom-reflux correlation was determined by the symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI), and symptom association probability (SAP).
RESULTS: Twenty studies were excluded due to premature detachment (9) or incomplete data capture for >6 of the 96-h period (11). Off therapy, 14 patients (35%) had abnormal esophageal acid exposure values. On day 4, 39 patients (98%) had normal acid exposure. The number of symptoms and acid reflux events were significantly higher off PPI therapy. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with a positive SI fell from 50% off PPI to 9% on PPI ( P < 0.01), whereas 63% of patients symptomatic off PPI therapy became asymptomatic on PPI therapy and could not have an SI calculated. Similarly, the SAP was abnormal in 45% of patients off PPI therapy but only 10% on PPI therapy ( P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Extended pH recording improves the detection of abnormal acid reflux and increases the number of recorded symptoms and acid reflux events. Combined off and on PPI therapy pH testing enhances the interpretation of pH monitoring and symptom-reflux correlations, which can be helpful in the management of patients with PPI-unresponsive gastroesophageal acid reflux symptoms.     

Noncardiac chest pain

Opinion statement Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a common condition with significant morbidity and economic implications. Psychological factors, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), alteration in pain perception, and esophageal dysmotility play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disorder. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is the most effective medical intervention for the treatment of GERD-related NCCP, as well as the most costeffective diagnostic strategy for this condition. Pain modulators such as tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors infer a visceral analgesic effect and consequently are the treatment of choice for patients with non-GERD-related NCCP. Furthermore, cognitive behavioral therapy has also been shown to be useful in the management of subset of patients with non-GERD-related NCCP. Newer therapeutic modalities and interventions such as lower esophageal sphincter injection of botulinum toxin in NCCP patients with spastic esophageal motility disorders, theophylline, and 5-HT4 receptor agonists may supplement or replace current treatment for non-GERD-related NCCP. Future compounds may include new visceral analgesics or medications that interfere with the development of peripheral or central sensitization.     

The role of acid and duodenal gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD

OBJECTIVE: Mixed reflux of acid and duodenal contents frequently occurs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to establish the contribution of acid and duodenal gastroesophageal reflux (DGER) to symptoms in patients with presumed GERD. METHODS: A total of 72 patients (37 women), mean age 45 yr (+/-2 yr), underwent 24-h ambulatory pH and Bilitec monitoring. Patients pressed a marker button when experiencing typical symptoms. For each symptom episode, minimal pH and maximal bilirubin optical density in a 2- or 4-min interval were calculated. For each patient, the symptom index (SI) and symptom-association probability for acid and for bile reflux were determined. RESULTS: A total of 544 symptom episodes were identified. Using a 2-min interval, 28% were associated with acid reflux, 9% with DGER, and 12% with mixed reflux. No significant difference was found when a 4-min interval was used. A positive SI for acid reflux was present in 21% of the patients and for DGER in 14%. All patients with a positive SI for DGER had also a positive SI for acid reflux. A positive symptom-association probability for acid reflux was present in 22% of the patients, for DGER in 7% of the patients, and for mixed reflux in 10% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom episodes in patients with presumed GERD are more related to acid reflux than to DGER. DGER does not play a major role in producing typical esophageal symptoms.     

Role of clinical presentation in diagnosing reflux-related non-cardiac chest pain

INTRODUCTION: Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) presents as a frequent diagnostic challenge, with patients tending to use a disproportionate level of health-care resources. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent cause of NCCP. Thus the typical symptoms of reflux, such as heartburn and regurgitation, when present as predominant symptoms are quite specific for diagnosing GERD but in patients with NCCP the clinical diagnosis of reflux is difficult, and invasive methods or the omeprazole test are required for its detection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of clinical presentation when diagnosing GERD among patients with NCCP. METHODS: Patients with NCCP underwent upper endoscopy, Bernstein and omeprazole tests. The patients were divided into two groups based on GER- or non-GER-related chest pain, and clinical presentation was compared between these two groups. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was considered positive when at least two methods were positive. RESULTS: From 78 NCCP patients (41 male; mean age 50.4 +/- 2.3 years), the chest pain was related to GERD in 35 patients (44.8%). The two groups were the same based on sex and age. The chest pain severity, site, radiation and relation to food, exercise, and sleep were equal in the two groups, except for two symptoms: pain that was relieved by antacid (P < 0.031) and presence of classical reflux symptoms (P < 0.009), seen in the GERD patients. With regard to recent patient history, heartburn and regurgitation symptoms were seen more frequently in GERD patients (P < 0.036 and P < 0.002, respectively). DISCUSSION: Clinical presentation is important in diagnosing GERD in NCCP. Although the chest pain is the same in reflux- and non-reflux-related NCCP, the symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation in the present or recent patient history are diagnostic for GERD-related chest pain.     

Positive predictors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and the therapeutic response to proton-pump inhibitors

AIM:To identify objective and subjective predictors for the reliable diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)and the response to proton pump inhibitor(PPI)therapy.METHODS:Retrospectively,683 consecutive patients suspected for GERD who underwent pH-metry/impedance measurement(pH/MII)were analyzed.All patients had previously undergone standard PPI treatment(e.g.,pantoprazole 40 mg/d or comparable).Four hundred sixty patients were at least 10 d off PPIs(group A),whereas 223 patients were analyzed during their ongoing PPI therapy(group B).In addition,all patients completed a standardized symptom-and lifestyle-based questionnaire,including the therapeutic response to previous PPI trials on a 10-point scale.Uniand multivariance analyses were performed to identify criteria associated with positive therapeutic response to PPIs.RESULTS:In group A,positive predictors(PPs)for response in empirical PPI trials were typical GERD symptoms(heartburn and regurgitation),a positive symptom index(SI)and pathological results in pH/MII,along with atypical symptoms,including hoarseness and fullness.In group B,regular alcohol consumption was associated with the therapeutic response.The PPs for pathological results in pH/MII in group A included positive SI,male gender,obesity,heartburn and regurgitation.In group B,the PPs were positive SI and vomiting.Analyzing for positive SI,the PPs were pathological pH and/or MII,heartburn regurgitation,fullness,nausea and vomiting in group A and pathological pH and/or MII in group B.CONCLUSION:Anamnestic parameters(gender,obesity,alcohol)can predict PPI responses.In non-obese,female patients with non-typical reflux symptoms,pH/MII should be considered instead of empirical PPIs.     

The role of esophageal pH monitoring in symptomatic patients on PPI therapy

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory pH monitoring while on therapy is often recommended in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with continued symptoms. However, to date, little data exist to justify this indication. AIM: To assess the role of pH monitoring in symptomatic patients despite aggressive therapy with typical or extra esophageal GERD. METHODS: Retrospective review of 2,291 ambulatory pH tracings (1999-2003) identified subgroup of studies performed on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Patients with prior fundoplication or Barrett's esophagus were excluded. Patients grouped on predominant presenting GERD symptoms: typical (heartburn and regurgitation) or extra esophageal (chest pain, cough, hoarseness, sore throat, shortness of breath, asthma). The distribution of abnormal pH parameters in each group calculated and univariate analyses assessed the probability of abnormal pH in each group. Abnormal cutoff values traditionally used in clinical practice and more stringent cutoff values used to determine distribution of abnormality as a function of cutoff values. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients (mean age 54.3 yrs, 59% female) underwent pH monitoring on either daily (b.i.d.) or twice daily (q.d.) on PPI therapy: 115 (46%) with extra esophageal and 135 (54%) with typical GERD symptoms. Extra esophageal GERD patients were more likely to undergo pH monitoring on b.i.d. PPIs (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.4; p < 0.01). 52 (93%) of typical and 74 (99%) of extra esophageal GERD patients on b.i.d. PPIs tested normal. The odds of a normal pH values were 11 times higher for patients on b.i.d. PPIs (OR = 11.4; 95% CI = 4.3-30.1, p < 0.01) than those on q.d. PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The likelihood of an abnormal esophageal pH for symptomatic GERD patients on b.i.d. PPI is very small. 2) In this group of patients failing b.i.d. PPIs causes other than GERD should be sought.     

Recent advances in noncardiac chest pain in Korea

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common cause of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) and is present in up to 60% of patients with NCCP in Western countries. In Korea, after a reasonable cardiac evaluation, GERD is reported to underlie 41% of NCCP cases. Typical reflux symptoms are frequent in Korean patients suffering from NCCP. Therefore, a careful history of the predominant symptoms, including heartburn and acid regurgitation, is relatively indicative of the GERD diagnosis in Korea. In Korea, in contrast to Western countries, patients aged 40 years and over who have been diagnosed with NCCP but who are without alarming features should undergo endoscopy to exclude gastric cancer or peptic ulcers because of the higher prevalence of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancers in the region. In a primary care setting, in the absence of any alarming symptoms, a symptomatic response to a trial of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is sufficient for the presumptive diagnosis of GERD. In addition, the optimal duration of a PPI test may be at least 2 weeks, as GERD symptoms tend to be less frequent or atypical in Korean patients than in patients from Western countries. In patients diagnosed with GERD-related NCCP, long-term therapy (more than 2 months) with double the standard dose of a PPI is required to alleviate symptoms. Esophageal dysmotility is relatively uncommon, and pain modulators seem to offer significant improvement of chest pain control in non-GERD-related NCCP. Most traditionally available tricyclics or heterocyclics have many undesirable effects. Therefore, newer drugs with fewer side effects (for example, the serotonin - norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) may be needed.     

Short course of omeprazole: a better first diagnostic approach to noncardiac chest pain than endoscopy,manometry, or 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) presents as a frequent diagnostic challenge, with patients tending to use a disproportionate level of health care resources. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent cause of NCCP. GOALS: To test the efficacy of a potent acid-suppressing agent as a diagnostic test in the evaluation of NCCP and to compare it with three commonly used tests. STUDY: Eighteen men and 24 women, aged 22 to 77 years, who presented with recurrent chest pain complaints of a noncardiac etiology, as determined by rest/stress perfusion imaging with technetium Tc99m sestamibi (MIBI), were enrolled in a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial using high-dose omeprazole. Thirty-seven patients completed both arms of the trial. Findings were compared with those of endoscopy, manometry, and ambulatory 24-hour two-channel esophageal pH monitoring. All patients underwent initial diagnostic upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring. Patients were then randomly assigned to either placebo or omeprazole (40 mg/d orally twice daily) for 14 days, washed out for 21 days, and then crossed over. Patient's symptoms were determined using a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the severity of chest pain before and after each period. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of patients in the omeprazole arm reported improved chest pain, whereas only 18% in the placebo arm did. Abnormal results on manometry (20%), 24-hour pH monitoring (42%), or endoscopy with visual evidence of esophagitis (26%) were found less frequently. Combination of the three tests did not significantly increase their usefulness. In NCCP patients with GERD, as defined by positive results on a 24-hour pH test or presence of esophagitis on endoscopy, omeprazole treatment led to a response in 95% of patients, whereas 90% of GERD-positive patients treated with placebo did not respond. Of NCCP patients determined to be GERD negative, 39% responded to omeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole as a first diagnostic tool in the evaluation of MIBI-negative NCCP is sensitive and specific for determining the cause of NCCP. Endoscopy, manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring were not only less sensitive in diagnosing NCCP, but they were significantly more expensive.     

Use of proton pump inhibitor as a diagnostic test in NCCP

Abstract:   Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is the most common extra-esophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The proton pump inhibitor empirical trial (PPI test) is a simple non-invasive, arcurate and cast-saving test for evaluating patients with GERD-related NCCP. The review will discuss the use of the PPI test as a diagnostic test for NCCP.     

Esophageal Mast Cell Infiltration in a 32-Year-Old Woman with Noncardiac Chest Pain

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is one of the most common esophageal symptoms and lacks a clearly defined mechanism. The most common cause of NCCP is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). One of the accepted mechanisms of NCCP in a patient without GERD has been altered visceral sensitivity. Mast cells may play a role in visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. In this case, a patient with NCCP and dysphagia who was unresponsive to proton pump inhibitor treatment had an increased esophageal mast cell infiltration and responded to 14 days of antihistamine and antileukotriene treatment. We suggest that there may be a relationship between esophageal symptoms such as NCCP and esophageal mast cell infiltration.