Treatment benefit of dapoxetine for premature ejaculation: results from a placebo‐controlled phase III trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the overall treatment benefit of dapoxetine for premature ejaculation (PE), with specific emphasis on improvements in personal distress and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation. Although these factors are key elements of numerous sets of diagnostic criteria for PE, they have rarely been evaluated as outcome measures in clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial we enrolled men aged ≥18 years, from the USA and Canada, who had a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision, diagnosis of PE (1238 men). Men were randomized to receive placebo or dapoxetine 60 mg as needed or once daily for 9 weeks. The once‐daily treatment arm was included for analysis of withdrawal symptoms (primary endpoint; presented elsewhere). Patients completed the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) on day 1 (before dosing), and on days 28 and 63 (or study endpoint), which comprised the outcome measures for perceived control over ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse, and personal distress and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation. The patient‐reported global impression of change in PE was reported on day 63 (or study endpoint). Treatment benefit measures included the composite criteria of at least a two‐category increase in perceived control over ejaculation and at least a one‐category decrease in personal distress related to ejaculation from baseline at study endpoint.

RESULTS

At baseline, ≈5% of patients in any treatment group reported ‘not at all’ or ‘a little bit’ of personal distress related to ejaculation, which increased to 54.3% of those receiving dapoxetine (vs 35.3% with placebo; P < 0.001). Similarly, 43.0% and 40.9% of men in the placebo and dapoxetine groups, respectively, reported ‘not at all’ or ‘a little bit’ of interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation at baseline, which increased to 76.8% and 64.2% of those with dapoxetine and placebo, respectively (P < 0.001). The percentage of men who achieved the composite criteria with dapoxetine ‘as needed’ was 47.6%, vs 21.7% with placebo (difference from placebo, 25.9%; P < 0.001). The distribution of responses for the PEP among men who achieved the composite criteria was similar to that reported for men without PE in a previous observational study in the USA. The most common adverse events were nausea, dizziness, headache, diarrhoea and insomnia, which were more common with dapoxetine than with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Dapoxetine reduced the personal distress and interpersonal difficulty associated with PE, and was associated with patient‐reported improvements in their condition. The percentage of patients who achieved a composite of a two‐category or greater increase in perceived control over ejaculation and a one‐category or greater decrease in personal distress related to ejaculation was substantially greater than with placebo, as were all outcome measures.     

Dapoxetine for the Treatment of Premature Ejaculation: Results from a Randomized,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial in 22 Countries

Background

Dapoxetine is being developed for the on-demand treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). Previous clinical trials have demonstrated its safety and efficacy.

Objective

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dapoxetine in men with PE.

Design, setting, and participants

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted in 22 countries, enrolled men (N = 1162) ≥18 yr of age who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision criteria for PE for ≥6 mo, with an intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) ≤2 min in ≥75% of intercourse episodes at baseline.

Intervention

Dapoxetine 30 mg or dapoxetine 60 mg or placebo on demand (1–3 h before intercourse) for 24 wk.

Measurements

Stopwatch-measured IELT, Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of change, adverse events (AEs).

Results and limitations

The study was completed by 618 men. Mean average IELT increased from 0.9 min at baseline (all groups) to 1.9 min, 3.2 min, and 3.5 min with placebo and dapoxetine 30 mg and dapoxetine 60 mg, respectively, at study end point; geometric mean IELT increased from 0.7 min at baseline to 1.1 min, 1.8 min, and 2.3 min, respectively, at study end point. All PEP measures and IELTs improved significantly with dapoxetine versus placebo at week 12 and week 24 (p < 0.001 for all). The most common AEs were nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, and headache. AEs led to discontinuation in 1.3%, 3.9%, and 8.2% of subjects with placebo and dapoxetine 30 mg and dapoxetine 60 mg, respectively. Limitations of this study included the exclusion of men who were not in long-term monogamous relationships.

Conclusions

Dapoxetine significantly improved all aspects of PE and was generally well tolerated in this broad population.     

Perceived control over ejaculation is central to treatment benefit in men with premature ejaculation: results from phase III trials with dapoxetine

OBJECTIVES

To assess the utility of perceived control over ejaculation (‘control’) in the evaluation of treatment benefit in men with premature ejaculation (PE), and to compare effects associated with a two‐category or greater increase in this variable between men receiving dapoxetine and placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This subanalysis used combined data from all treatment groups in an integrated analysis of two identically designed, 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trials of dapoxetine. Men (2614) met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition, text revision) criteria for PE, had a stopwatch‐measured intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of ≤2 min in ≥75% of events in a 2‐week baseline period, and self‐reported moderate or severe PE. Men received placebo or dapoxetine 30 or 60 mg, 1–3 h before intercourse. The stopwatch‐measured IELT was recorded for each episode; the patient‐reported global impression of change (PGI; 7‐point scale, ‘much worse’ to ‘much better’), control and satisfaction with sexual intercourse (5‐point scales, ‘very poor’ to ‘very good’) were assessed monthly. The utility of a two‐category or greater increase in control was evaluated by examining the relationship of this variable with IELT and satisfaction with sexual intercourse.

RESULTS

Of 2341 men with baseline and endpoint assessments, 96.8% reported ‘very poor’ or ‘poor’ control at baseline, and 748 (32%) reported a two‐category or greater increase in control after treatment. More than 95% of those men rated their PE as ‘slightly better’, ‘better’, or ‘much better’ on the PGI; 67.1% gave ratings of ‘better’ or ‘much better.’ They also had greater improvements in IELT than men with less than a two‐category increase in control, with a mean (sd ) change from baseline of 3.7 (4.3) vs 0.77 (1.8) min, respectively, and a greater percentage reported good or very good satisfaction with sexual intercourse than men with less than a two‐category increase in control (74% vs 19%, respectively). Nausea, headache and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common adverse events reported by men with a two‐category or greater increase in control (15.8%, 7.4% and 6.6%, respectively) and those without (8.5%, 5.5% and 6.5%, respectively). The proportions of men with a two‐category or greater increase in control with dapoxetine 30 and 60 mg were 36.3% and 44.5%, respectively (vs 15% with placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

A two‐category or greater increase in control (5‐point scale) is useful for assessing the treatment benefit in men with PE; it corresponds with improvements in the man’s perception of his condition, substantially greater prolongation of IELT, and higher levels of satisfaction with sexual intercourse.     

Effect of premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy combined with dapoxetine hydrochloride on the treatment of primary premature ejaculation

To evaluate the overall treatment benefits of premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy combined with 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride treatment on patients with primary premature ejaculation (PPE). Ninety‐nine PPE patients were randomly divided into two groups at the ratio of 2:1. Sixty‐six PPE patients received premature ejaculation desensitisation therapy accomplished by Weili Automatic Semen Collection—Penis Erection Detection and Analysis workstation (WLJY‐2008) combined with 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride treatment (DTCD group), and another 33 patients received 30 mg dapoxetine hydrochloride‐only treatment (DO group). Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) and premature ejaculation profile (PEP) were recorded before and during the treatment, and clinical global impression of change (CGIC) in PPE was recorded at the fourth week and the end of the treatment and the items. In both groups were significantly improved (p < 0.0001) in IELT, PEP and CGIC for premature ejaculation compared with baseline, and DTCD treatment showed a more significant improvement on PPE patients in the items compared with DO treatment (p < 0.05). Thus, premature ejaculation desensitisation combined with dapoxetine therapy may be a better choice for improving premature ejaculation with PPE.     

A comprehensive assessment of genetic variation in serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR+rs25531) and the response to dapoxetine in Chinese patients with premature ejaculation

This study was to explore whether serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR+rs25531) influence the response to dapoxetine treatment in a Chinese population with premature ejaculation (PE). 112 patients with PE re-enrolled from our previous study received dapoxetine monotherapy. At the endpoint, patients with S’S’ had a significant increased risk of nonresponse compared with L’ carriers (p < .001). The improvement in S’S’ genotype was significantly lower in premature ejaculation profile (PEP) items of ‘control over ejaculation’ (p = .035) and ‘distress related to ejaculation’ (p = .017) than that in L’ carriers. As to clinical global impression of change (CGIC), results in S’S’ subjects showed significantly lower scores (p = .008) and a less satisfaction rate reporting at least ‘better’ (p = .020) compared with L’ carriers. Moreover, our findings suggested that patients with S’S’ were more likely to develop adverse effects (AEs) compared with L’ carriers (p = .040). This study suggests that PE patients bearing the S’S’ genotype have an inferior comprehensive efficacy and safety of dapoxetine treatment, which consist of poorer response in IELTs, less improvement in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and greater incidence of AEs, than L’ carriers. Variants of triallelic 5-HTTLPR may play a major role as a predictor of treatment response to dapoxetine.     

Relationship between premature ejaculation and genetic polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3)

What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The process of ejaculation is highly influenced by genetic and neurobiological factors. Central dopaminergic drugs facilitate ejaculation. Genetic variation in SLC6A3 may alter the expression of dopamine transporter gene (DAT). This study evaluated the associations between genetic polymorphisms of the DAT and PE. A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of 9‐repeat allele and 9/10 genotype and PE. The presence of 7‐repeat allele had protective effect against PE.

OBJECTIVE

? To investigate the possible relationships between premature ejaculation (PE) polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter (DAT) gene (SLC6A3, DAT1), which has a polymorphic 40 base pair (40 bp) variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) sequence in the 3′‐untranslated region (3′ VNTR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Cohorts of 270 Iranian men with PE and 266 age‐matched healthy Iranian subjects were genotyped for the DAT1‐VNTR polymorphism.

RESULTS

? The 10‐repeat allele frequencies were similar in the control (90.2%) and patient groups (88.5%) (P = 0.8). ? A statistically significant association was observed between the presence of the nine‐repeat allele and PE (chi‐squared test = 4.346, odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57–3.15, P = 0.026). ? The frequencies of the 9/10 genotype were also significantly higher in the PE patients than in normal controls (chi‐squared test = 4.466, OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.52–3.21, P = 0.028). The presence of the seven‐repeat allele had a protective effect against PE (chi‐squared test = 2.324, OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.47–0.89, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

? The findings of the present study suggest that DAT1‐VNTR polymorphisms resulting in higher dopamine concentrations were associated with vulnerability to PE. ? Further studies are needed to replicate these results and to evaluate the role of inconsistency in the DAT genes and how this affects the development of PE.     

Analysis of association between the 5‐HTTLPR and STin2 polymorphisms in the serotonin‐transporter gene and clinical response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (sertraline) in patients with premature ejaculation

Study Type – Therapy (cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that polymorphism within the gene‐linked polymorphic region (5‐HTTLPR) and second intron of SLC6A4 gene (STin2) is associated with selective serotonin‐reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) response in subjects with premature ejaculation (PE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 246 men with PE were recruited in this study. They were asked to take sertraline 50 mg daily for 2 weeks, and thereafter 100 mg daily, for a 12‐week treatment period. Pretreatment evaluation included history and physical examination, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The efficacy of treatment was assessed using responses to IIEF, and geometric mean IELT evaluation. 5‐HTTLPR was genotyped using polymerase chain reaction techniques. A repeated‐measures analysis of variance of geometric mean IELT was done to test a genotype effect on treatment outcome with SSRI (sertraline).

RESULTS

Of 227 participants who completed the study, 175 (77.1%) responded to sertraline (IELT >1 min). Overall the patients had a 3.7‐fold (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.72–5.46) increase of the geometric mean IELT (P = 0.001). The results showed that responses were significantly better for the L_A/L_A genotype of the 5‐HTTLPR polymorphism than for S‐allele carriers (P = 0.001). The STin2 12/12 genotype was found more often in those responding to sertraline than in those not responding (P = 0.001). The probability of patients responding sufficiently to sertraline with an L_A/L_A genotype was highest (odds ratio 4.66, 95% CI, 2.48–6.14).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the genotype of 5‐HTT contributes in unique ways to the variation in the outcome of PE treatment with SSRIs.     

Safety and efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine,Qiaoshao formula,combined with dapoxetine in the treatment of premature ejaculation: An open-label,real-life,retrospective multicentre study in Chinese men

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Chinese medicine, Qiaoshao formula combined with dapoxetine was used for the treatment of premature ejaculation in a real-life setting. Nine hundred and five males diagnosed with premature ejaculation were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. We divided the patients into two groups: dapoxetine alone and Qiaoshao formula combined with dapoxetine according to actual interventions provided to patients in clinics. The perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time and the premature ejaculation profile measures markedly improved in both groups. However, in men with severe premature ejaculation (baseline perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time <1 min) and those with baseline age ≤30 years, the perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time was slightly but significantly longer with combined therapy than with dapoxetine alone (p < .05). Therefore, combined therapy involving the Qiaoshao formula and dapoxetine proved to safe as well as effective for treating premature ejaculation while prolonging the perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time, which significantly improved the overall satisfaction of the patient and likely that of the couple.     

The effects of three phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on ejaculation latency time in lifelong premature ejaculators: a double-blind laboratory setting study

Study Type – Therapy (RCT)
Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Several authors have reported their experience with PDE5 inhibitors alone or in combination with selective serotonin re‐uptake inhibitors for treating premature ejaculation. However, to our knowledge, this is the first laboratory design study to evaluate the effects of three PDE5 inhibitors throughout the ejaculation process in men with lifelong premature ejaculation. In this laboratory setting study PDE5 inhibitors seem to prolong ELT but the difference from placebo is significant only in vardenafil. The quality of penile rigidity is better with PDE5 inhibitors in the post‐ejaculatory period but the difference is significant only in sildenafil and vardenafil.

OBJECTIVE

? To evaluate the effects of three phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors on the ejaculation process in men with lifelong premature ejaculation using a double‐blind laboratory setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Eighty men with lifelong premature ejaculation, 20 in each group, received placebo, vardenafil (10 mg), sildenafil (50 mg) or tadalafil (20 mg) in a double‐blind study design. Placebo or PDE5 inhibitor was ingested after at least 2 h fasting and non‐smoking. The subjects were placed in a silent room immediately and real‐time penile rigidity and tumescence was monitored. ? Subjects read some magazines or newspapers without any sexually stimulating material for 1.5 h. At the end of this period audiovisual sexual stimulation began with a video film and after the 8th minute the subject began vibratory stimulation to the frenular area. ? At the beginning of ejaculation the patient stopped stimulation. When the patient began and stopped stimulation, the light near the observer turned on and off and the observer calculated the ejaculation period with a chronometer. The elapsed time was the ejaculation latency time (ELT) in seconds. ? There was no interaction between subjects and observer during the test. The ELT, and the qualities of base and tip rigidities during ELT and after ejaculation were calculated.

RESULTS

? Median age of patients was 29 (range 22–39) years and median duration of premature ejaculation was 60 (range 7–180) months and there was no significant difference between groups. Median duration of vibratory stimulation (ELT) of subjects who received placebo was 48.5 s: 53.5 s for sildenafil, 70.0 s for tadalafil and 82.5 s for vardenafil. Compared with the placebo group, ELT was significantly longer only in subjects receiving vardenafil (P = 0.019). ? In the post‐ejaculatory refractory period, times to last recorded base rigidities were significantly longer than placebo in vardenafil and sildenafil groups with better erection quality (P < 0.01 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

? The PDE5 inhibitors seem to prolong ELT and the quality of penile rigidity is better with PDE5 inhibitors in post‐ejaculatory period. ? These findings suggest that PDE5 inhibitors might have some beneficial effects in men with lifelong premature ejaculation.     

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of the on‐demand use of paroxetine,dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomised placebo‐controlled clinical trial

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the on‐demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation (PE). In a single‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical study, 150 PE patients without erectile dysfunction (ED) were included during the period of March 2015 to May 2016. Patients were randomly divided into five groups (30 patients each). On demand placebo, paroxetine (30 mg), dapoxetine (30 mg), sildenafil citrate (50 mg) and combined dapoxetine (30 mg) with sildenafil citrate (50 mg) were given for patients for 6 weeks in each group respectively. All patients were instructed to record intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and evaluated with Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and the patient satisfaction score before and after treatment. The mean of IELT, satisfaction score and PEDT in all groups was significantly improved after treatment (p value = .001). Combined dapoxetine with sildenafil group had the best values of IELT, satisfaction scores and PEDT in comparison with other treatment groups (p value <.001). The combined dapoxetine with sildenafil therapy could significantly improve PE patients without ED as compared to paroxetine alone or dapoxetine alone or sildenafil alone with tolerated adverse effects.     

Relevance of serum nitric oxide levels and the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors treatment on premature ejaculation: decreased nitric oxide is associated with premature ejaculation

The aim of the present study was to determine the relevance of serum nitric oxide levels and the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) treatment on premature ejaculation. Sixty married men (aged 20–50) with lifelong premature ejaculation and forty healthy men (aged 24–48) as control group were included in this study. The patients were evaluated by intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) for premature ejaculation (PE). IELT<1 min is accepted PE. Patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic disorders or erectile dysfunction and heavy smokers were excluded. All patients were evaluated with history, physical examination, International Index of Erectile Dysfunction‐5 (IIEF‐5) score and IELT by stopwatch method. Nitric oxide levels were measured by Griess reaction, and all samples were frozen at ?80 °C. Patients were randomly categorised 4 group to receive fluoxetine 20 mg day^?1 (Group 1), paroxetine 20 mg day^?1 (Group 2), sertraline 50 mg day^?1 (Group 3) and healthy control (Group 4) for 4 weeks. Baseline and post‐treatment findings were compared between the four groups. At the end of 4 weeks, in fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline groups mean IELT values showed a statistically significant improvement from the baseline values (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.03; respectively). Baseline and 1st month follow‐up mean IIEF scores were 24.5 and 23.05, 24.70 and 23.60 (P < 0.05) in group 1 and group 3 respectively; also 23.09 and 23.32 (P > 0.05) in group 2. Baseline serum NO levels were 31.8, 30.44, 30.8 and 42.84 in fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and healthy control groups respectively. NO levels were statistically lower in patients with PE. After treatment of fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline, NO levels were increased baseline (35.8, 36.4, 38.08) (P < 0.05). Our findings indicated that PE is associated with decreased serum NO levels. After the SSRI treatment increased, NO may retard ejaculation presumably by central peripheral mechanism. Further studies are needed to confirm this suggestion and the role of NO in pathophysiology and treatment for premature ejaculation.     

An evidence-based definition of lifelong premature ejaculation: report of the International Society for Sexual Medicine Ad Hoc Committee for the Definition of Premature Ejaculation

OBJECTIVE

To develop a contemporary, evidence‐based definition of premature ejaculation (PE).

METHODS

There are several definitions of PE; the most commonly quoted, the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – 4th Edition – Text Revision, and other definitions of PE, are all authority‐based rather than evidence‐based, and have no support from controlled clinical and/or epidemiological studies. Thus in August 2007, the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) appointed several international experts in PE to an Ad Hoc Committee for the Definition of PE. The committee met in Amsterdam in October 2007 to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of current definitions of PE, to critically assess the evidence in support of the constructs of ejaculatory latency, ejaculatory control, sexual satisfaction and personal/interpersonal distress, and to propose a new evidence‐based definition of PE.

RESULTS

The Committee unanimously agreed that the constructs which are necessary to define PE are rapidity of ejaculation, perceived self‐efficacy, and control and negative personal consequences from PE. The Committee proposed that lifelong PE be defined as a male sexual dysfunction characterized by ejaculation which always or nearly always occurs before or within about one minute of vaginal penetration, and the inability to delay ejaculation on all or nearly all vaginal penetrations, and negative personal consequences, such as distress, bother, frustration and/or the avoidance of sexual intimacy. This definition is limited to men with lifelong PE who engage in vaginal intercourse. The panel concluded that there are insufficient published objective data to propose an evidence‐based definition of acquired PE.

CONCLUSION

The ISSM definition of lifelong PE represents the first evidence‐based definition of PE. This definition will hopefully lead to the development of new tools and patient‐reported outcome measures for diagnosing and assessing the efficacy of treatment interventions, and encourage ongoing research into the true prevalence of this disorder, and the efficacy of new pharmacological and psychological treatments.     

Dapoxetine and the treatment of premature ejaculation

Background

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common male sexual complaint. Off-label oral selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of PE. Dapoxetine is a short-acting SSRI specifically designed for on-demand use. The objective of this communication is to summarize the clinical and physiological evidence regarding the role of the serotonergic pathway and specifically dapoxetine in the treatment of PE.

Methods

A PubMed search was conducted on articles reporting data on dapoxetine for the treatment of PE. Articles describing the pathophysiology and treatment options for PE were additionally included for review.

Results

The etiology of PE is multi-factorial in nature. There are many treatment options for PE such as psychological/behavioral therapy, topical anesthetic agents, phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, and tramadol hydrochloride. SSRIs play a major role in PE treatment. Animal and clinical studies in addition to its pharmacokinetic document dapoxetine’s clinical efficacy and safety for on-demand treatment of PE.

Conclusions

Dapoxetine demonstrates clinical efficacy and a favorable side effect profile. Dapoxetine is currently the oral drug of choice for on-demand treatment of PE.     

The link between penile hypersensitivity and premature ejaculation

Study Type – Aetiology (case control)
Level of Evidence 3b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Very little is known about the aetiology of premature ejaculation. This analysis shows that many PE patients have a heightened penile sensitivity. This information could result in the design and development of new drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the correlation between penile hypersensitivity and premature ejaculation (PE), as defined by the criteria identified by the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM). Penile hypersensitivity as a cause of PE is based on historical clinical neurophysiological data and clinical efficacy of the topical desensitizing agent PSD502 in the treatment of PE. PSD502 is a eutectic‐like mixture of two local anaesthetics, lidocaine and prilocaine, whose primary action is to reduce neuronal conduction in sensory afferents.

METHODS

Historical neurophysiological data was reviewed, together with data from the recent PSD502 clinical trials, including the first published double‐blind clinical trial data evaluating a topical desensitizing agent in a population of men with PE, as per the new ISSM definition. The clinical profile of PSD502, based on its local anaesthetic properties, is used as a surrogate index of the role of sensory afferents in the ejaculatory reflex.

RESULTS

The published data does not support unequivocally penile hypersensitivity as the cause of PE. Interpretation of the data is hampered by the variability of the populations described as having PE across studies. Data from the PSD502 clinical trials clearly shows that PSD502 increases ejaculatory latency, and improves control and sexual satisfaction when applied topically to men with PE 5 min before intercourse, enabling subjects to delay ejaculation up to six times longer than those who used a placebo.

CONCLUSION

The clinical profile of PSD502 lends credibility to the penile hypersensitivity hypothesis for PE. The predominant action of local anaesthetics is to reduce neuronal firing in sensory afferents; the clinical profile of PSD502, which shows improvement of ejaculatory function in the absence of a generalized reduction in penile sensitivity, can most readily be explained based on an underlying hypersensitivity in patients with PE.     

PSD502 improves ejaculatory latency,control and sexual satisfaction when applied topically 5 min before intercourse in men with premature ejaculation: results of a phase III,multicentre, double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of PSD502 applied topically 5 min before intercourse on the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of men with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) defined according to the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM) definition; secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PSD502 in patients with PE, and their sexual partners.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men aged >18 years, in stable heterosexual, monogamous relationships, and with lifelong PE diagnosed according to both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (text revision) criteria and the ISSM definition, consented (together with their partners) to enter the baseline period of the study. Patients who documented an IELT of ≤1 min with two or more of the first three sexual encounters during the 4‐week baseline period were randomized, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive double‐blind treatment with PSD502 (three actuations of spray each containing 7.5 mg lidocaine and 2.5 mg prilocaine applied 5 min before intercourse) or placebo for 3 months. Patients completed IPE and Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) questionnaires at entry and at monthly clinic visits, and recorded stopwatch‐timed IELT during each sexual encounter. Patients rated the quality of their orgasms on a 5‐point scale at baseline and at the end of the treatment period, and rated the study medication on a 4‐point scale. Safety was assessed by collecting adverse event data.

RESULTS

In all, 300 men with PE were randomized from 31 centres in Europe. The geometric mean (range) IELT over the 3‐month treatment period increased from a baseline of 0.6 min in both groups to 3.8 (0.3–57.8) and 1.1 (0–15.0) min in the PSD502 and placebo groups, respectively. Adjusting for treatment‐group imbalances, this represents a 6.3‐fold and 1.7‐fold increase in adjusted geometric means. There were significantly greater increases in the scores for the IPE domains of ejaculatory control and sexual satisfaction in the PSD502 group than in the placebo group, with a mean (sem ) 7.0 (0.59)‐point difference between treatments in change from baseline in the IPE domain for ejaculatory control and a 5.9 (0.57)‐ point difference in change from baseline in the IPE domain for sexual satisfaction (both P < 0.001). This was supported by improvements in all secondary endpoints. At the end of the treatment period 66% of patients rated PSD502 as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. PSD502 was well tolerated and no systemic adverse events were reported. Localized treatment‐related adverse events were reported by 2.6% and 3.1% of patients and partners, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PSD502 applied topically 5 min before intercourse improved ejaculatory latency and significantly improved ejaculatory control and sexual satisfaction, factors relevant for acceptance of a PE treatment by both patient/physician and regulatory authorities. PSD502 was well tolerated by both patients and partners, with no systemic side‐effects and a low incidence of localized effects, and was rated favourably by most users. PSD502 therefore appears to offer significant advantages over other therapies in development for the treatment of PE.     

The prevalence of premature ejaculation in young Turkish men

This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of premature ejaculation (PE) in young Turkish men and to evaluate PE in a population having good physical and mental health. A total of 1230 healthy university graduates aged between 24 and 30 attending the police academy having no physical or mental problems were included in the study. To identify the presence of PE, the participants were asked to complete the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT). The mean ages in the PE and non‐PE group were 27.3 and 26.7 respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and alcohol consumption (P > 0.05). The PE prevalence was found to be 9.2%. The mean PEDT score was calculated as 6.3. Of the participants, 92 scored 11 and higher (9.2%), 66 scored 9 and 10 (6.6%), and the remaining 842 obtained a score equal to or lower than 8 (84.2%). The lower prevalence of PE in young Turkish men compared to the results of studies in the literature can be attributed to the physical and mental well‐being of the participants. This study showed that the prevalence of PE in young men with good physical and mental health is lower than that found in the literature.     

Impact of physical activity on patient self‐reported outcomes of lifelong premature ejaculation patients: Results of a prospective,randomised, sham‐controlled trial

Previous studies have investigated whether physical activity increases serotonin hormone levels. Serotonin receptor dysfunction is one of the frequently accused factors of premature ejaculation (PE). Nevertheless, no studies up to date have demonstrated that the association between physical activity and premature ejaculation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between physical activity and PE and determine whether moderate physical activity might delay ejaculation time or be an alternative treatment for PE. A total of 105 patients diagnosed with PE were enrolled in this study. Of the patients, 35 were treated with dapoxetine, (30 mg) on demand (Group 1), 35 performed moderate physical activities (Group 2), and 35 performed minimal physical activity (Group 3‐sham). Demographic characteristics, metabolic equivalents (MET), premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT) and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded. There were no significant differences among three groups in terms of age, BMI, MET, PEDT or IELT before treatment. At the end of the study, there was significant decrease in PEDT scores, and increase in IELT in groups 1 and 2 as compared to Group 3. In conclusion, a moderate physical activity longer than 30 min at least 5 times a week leads to ejaculation delay, and appears as an alternative to dapoxetine on demand for the treatment of PE.     

Acupuncture versus paroxetine for the treatment of premature ejaculation: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Background

Acupuncture therapy has been used by many researchers in both male and female sexual dysfunction studies.

Objective

To determine whether acupuncture is effective as a premature ejaculation (PE) treatment compared with paroxetine and placebo.

Design, setting, and participants

The study was conducted with methodologic rigor based on Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria. Ninety patients referred to the urology clinic at a tertiary training and research hospital with PE were included in this randomized controlled trial and randomly assigned into paroxetine, acupuncture, and placebo groups. Heterosexual, sexually active men aged between 28 and 50 yr were included. Men with other sexual disorders, including erectile dysfunction; with chronic psychiatric or systemic diseases; with alcohol or substance abuse; or who used any medications were excluded.

Intervention

The medicated group received paroxetine 20 mg/d; the acupuncture or sham-acupuncture (placebo) groups were treated twice a week for 4 wk.

Measurements

Intravaginal ejaculation latency times (IELTs) and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) were used to assess PE. IELTs were calculated by using a partner-held stopwatch. Data were analyzed statistically.

Results and limitations

Median PEDT scores of paroxetine, acupuncture, and placebo groups were 17.0, 16.0, and 15.5 before treatment, and 10.5, 11.0, and 16.0 after treatment, respectively (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.314, respectively). Subscores after treatment were significantly lower than subscores before treatment in the paroxetine and acupuncture groups but remained the same in the placebo group. Significant differences were found between mean-rank IELTs of the paroxetine and placebo groups (p = 0.001) and the acupuncture and placebo groups (p = 0.001) after treatment. Increases of IELTs with paroxetine, acupuncture, and placebo acupuncture were 82.7, 65.7, and 33.1 s, respectively. Extent of ejaculation delay induced by paroxetine was significantly higher than that of acupuncture (p = 0.001). The most important limitation of the study was the lack of follow-up.

Conclusions

Although less effective than daily paroxetine, acupuncture had a significant stronger ejaculation-delaying effect than placebo.     

Blood pressure changes during sexual stimulation, ejaculation and midodrine treatment in men with spinal cord injury

Associate Editor Michael G. Wyllie Editorial Board Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effectiveness of various sources of self‐stimulation, including oral midodrine, in triggering ejaculation in men with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to document the systematic variations in blood pressure at ejaculation and consider a revised definition of autonomic dysreflexia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 62 men with SCI lesions from C2 to L2. Ejaculation potential was assessed with various sources of stimulation, beginning with natural stimulation, followed, if the test was negative, by penile vibrator stimulation (PVS) followed, if the test was again negative, by PVS combined with oral midodrine, started at 5 mg and increased in 5 mg steps up to 25 mg. The success rate of ejaculation was recorded, as were blood pressure (BP) changes measured at baseline and at ejaculation (or on the last trial if the test was negative). Reported sensations were also recorded and compared during positive and negative tests.

RESULTS

Overall, 89% of the patients reached ejaculation with one mode or another of stimulation. When patients had a negative result with natural stimulation, 56% were salvaged by PVS, and when PVS was negative, another 22% were salvaged by midodrine combined with PVS. The mean systolic BP increased by 35 mmHg at ejaculation during PVS and by 11 mmHg after midodrine, and a subsequent 29 mmHg at ejaculation during PVS combined with midodrine. By contrast, negative tests showed a relatively stable BP; the difference in changes in BP during positive and negative tests was significant (P < 0.01). Increases in BP during positive tests declined significantly more often within the limits of autonomic dysreflexia than negative tests (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These results support the view that most men with SCI can obtain an ejaculation when a wide spectrum of stimulation is used, including natural stimulation, PVS, and PVS combined with oral midodrine. Positive tests were associated with significant increases in BP, in contrast to negative tests, where BP was relatively stable. This suggests that significant changes in BP are required for ejaculation and that insignificant changes are predictive of future failure. As most changes in BP during positive tests also fall within the criterion of autonomic dysreflexia, a revised definition of autonomic dysreflexia should be considered to encourage safe experiences with ejaculation and safe use of midodrine.     

Identifying constructs and criteria for the diagnosis of premature ejaculation: implication for making errors of classification

OBJECTIVES

To review the many definitions of premature ejaculation (PE), determine the essential elements that best define PE, and examine and discuss the consequences of errors of inclusion and exclusion in the diagnosis of PE.

METHODS

We reviewed recent evidenced‐based studies that delineate the variables that best define PE, and the relationships between these factors. We then assessed the consequences of errors of measurement, inclusion and exclusion for setting the thresholds for the three variables.

RESULTS

PE can best be defined by a multidimensional set of criteria composed of three essential elements: (i) intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT); (ii) a lack of perceived self‐efficacy or control about the timing of ejaculation; and (iii) distress and interpersonal difficulty related to the ejaculatory dysfunction. After delineating the variables, thresholds for each variable need to be determined. Carefully constructed thresholds attempt to minimize errors of inclusion and exclusion. However, even the best criteria cannot eliminate all error. The two types of errors in classification are, to some extent, inversely related: the more restrictive the criteria, the more likely that there will be errors of exclusion, whereas the more lenient the criteria the more likely there will be errors of inclusion.

CONCLUSION

Research and treatment protocols might use different threshold values for classification, as their goals might be different. For a PE research protocol, we suggest erring on the side of a more narrow definition as it would: (i) provide a more conservative, and we think, realistic prevalence of the disorder; (ii) help to establish PE as a bona fide sexual dysfunction rather than a ‘life‐style’ issue for men seeking to enhance their sexual life; (iii) ensure greater confidence in the efficacy of existing and new treatment approaches; and (iv) strengthen the likelihood of acceptance by the regulatory authorities. Conversely, standard treatment protocols for PE might use more lenient criteria if the treatment has minimal adverse events and the degree of distress of the sufferer is high.