局限期小细胞肺癌不同剂量分割模式放疗的疗效分析

目的 比较不同剂最分割模式放疗对局限期小细胞肺癌生存的影响.方法 回顾分析本院2001-2007年收治的177例局限期小细胞肺癌患者资料.入组条件为病理学证实、局限期且接受了根治性放化疗的患者.根据剂量分割模式将患者分为常规分割组(1.8～2.0 Gy/次,1次/d,63例)、超分割组(1.4 Gy/次,2次/d,79例)和大分割组(2.5 Gy/次,1次/d,35例).对3个组的总生存率、无进展生存率和治疗失败模式进行统计分析.结果 随访率为96.6%,随访满2、5年者分别为153、92例.全组2、5年总生存率分别为43.4%、23.5%,中位生存期为22.4个月.常规分割组、超分割组、大分割组的2年总生存率和无进展生存率分别为31%、46%、59%(x2=7.94,P=0.019)和20%、31%、40%(x2=4.86,P=0.088),两两比较发现2年总生存率大分割组优于常规分割组(x2=7.81,P=0.005),超分割组介于两组之间但差别均无统计学意义(x2=2.31,P=0.128;x2=2.95,P=0.086).毒副反应以大分割组最轻,局部进展与远处转移分布3个组相似.结论 大分割放疗局限期小细胞肺癌显示了一定生存优势,有必要前瞻性临床研究验证其临床价值.     

Split-course versus continuous thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: final report of a randomized phase III trial

The optimal integration of radiation and chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase III trial was conducted to determine whether chemotherapy plus interdigitating split-course thoracic radiation therapy (RT) improved survival compared with standard-dose continuous thoracic RT. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 50 Gy thoracic RT delivered in 2.0-Gy fractions given continuously (5 weeks) concurrent with the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (arm A) or 50 Gy delivered via an interdigitating split course in 2.5-Gy fractions (8 weeks) concurrent with the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy (arm B). During the split-course RT, once-daily radiation was delivered on days 8-17 of each of the first two 21-day cycles and days 8-11 of the third 21-day cycle. All patients received the following chemotherapy: cisplatin/etoposide on cycles 1, 2, and 5 and cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin on cycles 3, 4, and 6. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was recommended after a complete response to all therapy. One hundred ten eligible patients were randomized. Grade 3/4 esophagitis was reported in 9% of patients receiving continuous thoracic RT versus 4% of patients receiving split-course RT. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was common in both treatment arms. Complete/partial response was observed in 80% of patients on arm A versus 84% on arm B. Overall survival rates at 5 years were 18% and 17% for arms A and B, respectively. Interdigitating split-course thoracic RT delivered in 2.5-Gy fractions was tolerable in patients with limited-stage SCLC but did not provide a survival advantage.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and continuous low-dose temozolomide in patients with recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas

To evaluate the efficacy of reirradiation and systemic chemotherapy as salvage treatment in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Between May 2006 and December 2011, 54 patients with recurrent malignant glioma received hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) plus systemic therapy at University of Rome Sapienza, Sant’ Andrea Hospital. All patients had Karnofsky performance score ≥60 and were previously treated with standard conformal RT (60 Gy) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) up to 12 cycles. Thirty-eight patients had a GBM and 16 patients had a grade 3 glioma. The median time interval between primary RT and reirradiation was 15.5 months. At the time of recurrence all patients received HSRT (30 Gy in 6-Gy fractions) plus concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m²/day) followed by continuous TMZ at 50 mg/m² everyday up to 1 year or until progression. Median overall survival after HSRT was 12.4 months, and the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 53 and 16 %, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months, and the 12- and 24-month PFS rates were 24 and 10 %, respectively. KPS >70 (P = 0.04) and grade 3 glioma were independent favourable prognostic factors for survival. In general chemoradiation regimen was well tolerated with relatively low treatment-related toxicity. HSRT plus concomitant TMZ followed by continuous dose-intense TMZ is a feasible treatment option associated with survival benefits and low risk of complications in selected patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The potential advantages of combined chemoradiation schedules in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas need to be explored in future studies.     

Failure to complete standard radiation therapy in glioblastoma patients: Patterns from a national database with implications for survival and therapeutic decision making in older glioblastoma patients

IntroductionIt is estimated that 5%–10% of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) fail to complete standard chemoradiation (CRT). We sought to determine the impact of failure to complete CRT on survival and to identify risk factors.MethodsWe queried the National Cancer Database and identified a cohort of 17,451 adults with GBM diagnosed from 2005 to 2012. The cohort was restricted to patients that started conventionally fractionated adjuvant chemoradiation of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction to a dose of ≤66Gy. Patients were stratified by RT dose: a) completed RT ≥ 58Gy, b) nearly completed RT ≥ 50Gy - <58Gy, and c) did not complete RT ≤ 50Gy.ResultsThe CRT completion rate correlated with survival, 87% of patients completed CRT and had a median OS of 13.5 months, 4% were near completers (median OS 5.7 months), and 9% did not complete RT (median OS 1.9 months). Older age was associated with a higher risk of non-completion. Twenty-eight percent of patients ≥80 years old did not complete standard CRT (OR 2.99) and 19% of 70–79-year olds did not complete CRT (OR 1.99). The adjusted mortality hazard ratio was greater for patients that did not complete CRT across all age categories and for nearly complete CRT patients older than 40 (non-significant for age < 40).ConclusionsFailure to complete standard chemoradiation was associated with decreased survival in our cohort. Patients with risk factors for failure (like advanced age) should be considered for alternative treatments such as hypofractionated radiotherapy.     

Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PurposeSeveral sentinel phase III randomized trials have recently been published challenging traditional radiation therapy (RT) practices for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline reviews the evidence for thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for both limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.MethodsThe American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on indications, dose fractionation, techniques and timing of thoracic RT for LS-SCLC, the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional RT in stage I or II node negative SCLC, PCI for LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, and thoracic consolidation for ES-SCLC. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.ResultsThe task force strongly recommends definitive thoracic RT administered once or twice daily early in the course of treatment for LS-SCLC. Adjuvant RT is conditionally recommended in surgically resected patients with positive margins or nodal metastases. Involved field RT delivered using conformal advanced treatment modalities to postchemotherapy volumes is also strongly recommended. For patients with stage I or II node negative disease, SBRT or conventional fractionation is strongly recommended, and chemotherapy should be delivered before or after SBRT. In LS-SCLC, PCI is strongly recommended for stage II or III patients who responded to chemoradiation, conditionally not recommended for stage I patients, and should be a shared decision for patients at higher risk of neurocognitive toxicities. In ES-SCLC, radiation oncologist consultation for consideration of PCI versus magnetic resonance surveillance is strongly recommended. Lastly, the use of thoracic RT is strongly recommended in select patients with ES-SCLC after chemotherapy treatment, including a conditional recommendation in those responding to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.ConclusionsRT plays a vital role in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. These guidelines inform best clinical practices for local therapy in SCLC.     

Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma: updated results of a phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) for localized carcinoma of the prostate, using a hypofractionated (55 Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks) vs. a conventionally fractionated (64 Gy/32 fractions/6.5 weeks) dose schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 217 patients were randomized to either the hypofractionated (108 patients) or the conventional (109 patients) dose schedule, with planning with two-dimensional (2D) CT scan planning methodology in the majority of cases. All patients were followed for a median of 48 (6-108) months. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated before RT and after its completion using modified late effects of normal tissue-subjective, objective, management, analytic (LENT-SOMA) scales and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer sexual function questionnaire. Efficacy of RT based on clinical, radiologic, and prostate-specific antigen data were also evaluated at baseline and after RT. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal and GU toxicity persisted 5 years after RT and did not differ between the two dose schedules other than in regard to urgency of defecation. However, 1-month GI toxicity was not only worse in patients with the hypofractionated RT schedule but also adversely affected daily activities. Nadir prostate-specific antigen values occurred at a median of 18.0 (3.0-54.0) months after RT. A total of 76 biochemical relapses, with or without clinical relapses, have occurred since; of these, 37 were in the hypofractionated and 39 in the conventional schedule. The 5-year biochemical +/- clinical relapse-free and overall survival was 55.9% and 85.3% respectively for all patients, and did not differ between the two schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma causes persistent GI toxicity that is largely independent of the two dose schedules. The hypofractionated schedule is equivalent in efficacy to the conventional schedule.     

Concurrent chemotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide) and involved-field radiotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer: a Dutch multicenter phase II study

To improve the prognosis of limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) the addition of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy to a platinum-containing regimen is important. In the Netherlands, we initiated a multicenter, phase II study, of the combination of four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5), paclitaxel (200 mg m(-2)) and etoposide (2 x 50 mg orally for 5 days) combined with 45 Gy (daily fractions of 1.8 Gy). The radiation was given to the involved field and concurrently with the second and third chemotherapy cycle. Patients with a partial or complete response received prophylactic cranial irradiation to a dose of 30 Gy. From January 1999 to December 2001, 37 of the 38 patients with LS-SCLC entered were eligible for toxicity analysis and response. Grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity occurred in 57% (21/37) with febrile neutropenia in 24% (9/37). There were no treatment-related deaths or other grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities were oesophagitis (27%), radiation pneumonitis (6%), anorexia (14%), nausea (16%), dyspnea (19%) and lethargy (22%). The objective response rate was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80-98%) with a median survival time of 19.5 months (95% CI 12.8-29.2). The 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rate was 70, 47 and 27%, respectively. In field local recurrences occurred in six patients. Distant metastases were observed in 19 patients of which 13 in the brain. This study indicates that combination chemotherapy with concurrent involved-field radiation therapy is an effective treatment for LS-SCLC. Despite PCI, the brain remained the most important site of recurrence.     

Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (stages I-III): observations from the National Cancer Data Base

The standard treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) has changed over the past 15 years. Standard treatment for LS-SCLC currently involves multiple-agent chemotherapy and early concurrent thoracic radiation therapy. Four patient cohorts (total number of patients, 22,969) diagnosed with LS-SCLC in 1985 (N=2123), 1990 (N=6279), 1995 (N=7815), and 2000 (N=6752) were studied in order to describe demographic and treatment pattern changes as well as 5-year survival rates across cohorts. Women composed 40.2% of patients in the 1985 cohort but represented a significant proportional increase over each successive cohort, representing 50.8% of the 2000 cohort. The proportion of patients aged >or=70 years also significantly increased over time, from 31.6% in 1985 to 44.9% in 2000 (P<0.001). Over these years, the use of chemoradiation as the primary treatment for patients with LS-SCLC increased from 34.6% to 51.9% (from 37% to 60.5% for patients aged <70 years, and from 29.5% to 41.3% for patients aged >or=70 years). During the same time, the use of chemotherapy as the sole treatment decreased from 30.7% in 1985 to 21.7% in 2000. Chemotherapy as the sole treatment was used in 25.9% of the population>or=70 years of age in 2000, compared with 18.3% in patients aged <70 years. The percent of patients for which there was no treatment given did not change significantly between the cohorts (14.3% in 1985 and 13.7% in 2000; P<0.001). The 5-year survival rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the 1985, 1990, and 1995 cohorts of all ages of patients treated with chemoradiation therapy are as follows: 10.5% (CI, 6.75%-14.25%), 11.88% (CI, 9.63%-14.13%), and 13.3% (CI, 11.2%-15.4%). Between 1985 and 2000 there was a significant increase in the percentage of women diagnosed with LS-SCLC. The use of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy also increased during this period. This increase in chemoradiation therapy was associated with a decreased use of chemotherapy alone. Despite changes in demographics and treatment during these time intervals, the 5-year survival for patients with LS-SCLC treated with chemoradiation therapy did not increase significantly. These results demonstrate the continued need for the evaluation of new treatments in this group of patients.     

Short-course versus split-course radiotherapy in metastatic spinal cord compression: results of a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is often used in the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). This randomized trial was planned to assess the clinical outcome and toxicity of two different hypofractionated RT regimens in MSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients with MSCC were randomly assigned to a short-course RT (8 Gy x 2 days) or to a split-course RT (5 Gy x 3; 3 Gy x 5). Only patients with a short life expectancy entered the protocol. Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 4 to 61 months). RESULTS: A total of 276 (92%) patients were assessable; 142 (51%) treated with the short-course and 134 (49%) treated with the split-course RT regimen. There was no significant difference in response, duration of response, survival, or toxicity found between the two arms. When short- versus split-course regimens were compared, after RT 56% and 59% patients had back pain relief, 68% and 71% were able to walk, and 90% and 89% had good bladder function, respectively. Median survival was 4 months and median duration of improvement was 3.5 months for both arms. Toxicity was equally distributed between the two arms: grade 3 esophagitis or pharyngitis was registered in four patients (1.5%), grade 3 diarrhea occurred in four patients (1.5%), and grade 3 vomiting or nausea occurred in 10 patients (6%). Late toxicity was never recorded. CONCLUSION: Both hypofractionated RT schedules adopted were effective and had acceptable toxicity. However, considering the advantages of the short-course regimen in terms of patient convenience and machine time, it could become the RT regimen of choice in the clinical practice for MSCC patients.     

Short-course palliative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective study

From February 1993 to October 1997, 91 consecutive patients with inoperable (stage IIIB-IV) histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer underwent palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy. Recently, the Medical Research Council studies on hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy (8.5 Gy x 2) have reported high control of symptoms caused by thoracic disease without toxicity. Based on these experiences and our previous positive trial on short-course radiotherapy (8 Gy x 2) in metastatic spinal cord compression, a prospective study of short-course palliative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer was carried out. The regimen was 16 Gy given in two 8-Gy fractions, 1 week apart. Eighty-one patients were evaluable for response to treatment. Forty-eight (59%) patients were 65 years or older. Forty (49%) patients were naive to radiotherapy, whereas 41 (51%) had previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy. All but four stage IV patients (95%) had poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (i.e., 2-3). Clinical palliation was achieved in 62 (77%) patients. Performance status improved in 59 (73%) patients. The median palliation time ranged from 28% to 57% of patient survival. The median survival from the beginning of treatment was 148 days (range, 5-681 days). No difference in overall survival according to stage and previous chemotherapy was observed. Only performance status conditioned survival (performance status 1-2 vs. performance status 3; p = 0.0289). Short-course radiotherapy gave good results in terms of clinical palliation for thoracic symptoms, even in patients with poor performance status and pretreated with chemotherapy. The median palliation time was approximately 50% of patient survival time. Treatment was generally well tolerated-only 4 (5%) patients experienced World Health Organization grade III dysphagia. No late toxicity was recorded. The two-fraction regimen had social and economic advantages compared with the conventional ones.     

Intraoperative radiation therapy in resected pancreatic carcinoma: long-term analysis

PURPOSE: The combination of external radiotherapy (RT) plus intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in patients with pancreatic cancer is still debated. This study presents long-term results (minimum follow-up, 102 months) for 26 patients undergoing integrated adjuvant RT (external RT+IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 1995, a total of 17 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent IORT (10 Gy) and postoperative external RT (50.4 Gy). Preoperative "flash" RT was included for the last 9 patients. The liver and pancreatic head received 5 Gy (two 2.5-Gy fractions) the day before surgery. In the subsequent period (1996-1998), 9 patients underwent preoperative concomitant chemoradiation (39.6 Gy) with 5-fluorouracil, IORT (10 Gy), and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Preoperative chemoradiation was completed in all patients, whereas postoperative therapy was completed in 13 of 17 patients. All 26 patients underwent pancreatectomy (25 R0 and one R1 resections). One patient died of postoperative complications (3.8%) not related to IORT. The 9 patients undergoing concomitant chemoradiation were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy; however, only 4 of 9 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. At last follow-up, 4 patients (15.4%) were alive and disease free. Disease recurrence was documented in 20 patients (76.9%). Sixteen patients (61.5%) showed distant metastasis, and 5 patients (19.2%) showed local recurrence. The incidence of local recurrence in R0 patients was 4 of 25 (16.0%). The overall 5-year survival rate was 15.4%. There was significant correlation with overall survival of tumor diameter (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of local recurrence in this long follow-up series (19.2%) was definitely less than that reported in other studies of adjuvant RT (approximately 50%), suggesting a positive impact on local control of integrated adjuvant RT (IORT+external RT).     

Using treatment interruptions to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer decreases survival and disease control

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact on survival outcomes of treatment interruptions due to toxicity arising during the concurrent phase of chemotherapy/radiotherapy (ChT/RT) for our limited-stage small-cell cancer (LSCLC) population over the past 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 1999, 215 patients received treatment for LSCLC, consisting of six cycles of alternating cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin or epirubicin/vincristine (CAV; CEV) and etoposide/cisplatin (EP). Thoracic RT was started with EP at either the second or third cycle (85% of patients). RT dose was either 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks or 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, delivered to a target volume encompassing gross disease and suspected microscopic disease with a 2 cm margin. Treatment breaks arising during concurrent ChT+RT were used to manage severe symptomatic or hematologic toxicities. We used the interruptions in thoracic RT as the 'marker' for any concurrent break and measured 'break duration' by the total length of time (in days) RT was interrupted, since that also signaled that ChT could be re-initiated. Patient results were analyzed for the impact of interruptions/treatment prolongation on overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: For all patients, 2-year and 5-year overall and disease-specific survivals were 22.7 and 7.2, 27.6 and 9.3%, respectively; overall and disease-specific median survivals were 14.7 months each. A total of 56 patients (26%) had treatment breaks due to toxicity. Hematologic depression caused the majority of breaks (88%). The median duration of breaks was 5 days (range 1-18). Patients with and without interruptions were compared for a range of prognostic factors and were not found to have any significant differences. Comparing interrupted/uninterrupted courses, median survivals were 13.8 versus 15.6 months, respectively, and 5-year overall survivals were 4.2 versus 8.3%, respectively. There was a statistical difference between overall survival curves which favored the uninterrupted group (P=0.01). When comparing a series of prognostic variables, multivariable analysis found that the most significant factor influencing survival in the present study was the presence of treatment breaks (P=0.006). There was a trend for development of any recurrence in the patients with breaks (P=0.08). When controlling for the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the two groups, the rate of failure in the chest was higher in the patients with RT breaks (58 vs. 33%). The rate of failure in the brain was dependent on the use of PCI only. CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions in treatment to palliate the toxicity from concurrent chemoradiation result in poorer local control and decreased survival.     

Routine use of approximately 60 Gy once-daily thoracic irradiation for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer receiving daily thoracic irradiation (RT) to approximately 60 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of patients treated with RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer between 1991 and 1999 at Duke University were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients were identified who had received continuous course once-daily 1.8-2 Gy fractions to approximately 60 Gy (range 58-66). All patients received chemotherapy (CHT); 32 received concurrent RT/CHT and 33 sequential CHT and then RT. Prophylactic cranial RT was administered to 17 patients. The time from diagnosis to local failure, tumor progression, and death was assessed using actuarial methods. The median follow-up for all patients was 16.7 months and for surviving patients was 29.6 months. The median age was 64 years (range 36-83), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (range 50-100). RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival was 40%, 25%, and 23%, respectively. One case of acute Grade 3 esophagitis developed. Ten late complications occurred: four pulmonary, two esophageal, two infectious, one leukemia, and one retinal toxicity with prophylactic cranial RT. Six were mild and resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION:CHT plus approximately 60 Gy of once-daily RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer was generally well tolerated. The survival rates were less than have been reported using 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy twice-daily fractions (2-year overall survival rate 47% compared with 30% in this study), but may be comparable because fewer than one-half our patients received concurrent CHT/RT and only 26% received prophylactic cranial RT. The relatively low rate of normal tissue morbidity in our patients supports the use of conventional once-daily fractionation to > or = 60 Gy. A randomized trial would be required to compare the outcomes after maximally tolerated dose twice-daily RT vs. maximally tolerated dose daily RT.     

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE: A pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) in the adjuvant treatment of primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The rationale of the study was to combine the potential radiobiologic advantage of hypofractionation to GBM with a highly conformal radiotherapeutic technique. The study was designed to measure the acute and chronic morbidity of patients treated with this regimen, response of GBM to the treatment, overall survival, and time to disease progression after therapy completion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty eligible patients were accrued between February 1999 and May 2000 for the study. All patients had Karnofsky performance scores of >/=70. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated RT using the NOMOS Peacock system. A dose of 50 Gy was delivered in 5-Gy daily fractions within 2 weeks to enhancing primary disease, residual tumor, or surgical cavity. Simultaneously, 30 Gy was prescribed in 3-Gy daily fractions to surrounding edema. The time to progression was measured with serial neurologic examinations and MRI or CT scans after RT completion. Acute and late toxicity was graded using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group neurotoxicity scores. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 were evaluated for outcome. The median time to disease progression was 6 months after RT completion. The median overall survival was 7 months after treatment completion. All recurrences were within 2 cm of the operative bed. Neurotoxicity during therapy was minimal, with all patients experiencing Grade 0 or 1 toxicity. Late toxicity included 10 patients with Grade 0, 2 patients with Grade 2, and 3 patients with Grade 4 toxicity, manifesting as brain necrosis requiring surgical reexcision. The survival of the 3 patients with brain necrosis was 23, 20, and 9 months. Mortality in all cases was the result of tumor recurrence, with no mortality resulting from brain necrosis. CONCLUSION: This regimen of hypofractionated intensity-modulated RT did not improve the time to disease progression or overall survival compared with historical experience using conventional fractionation. However, the treatment duration was reduced from 6 weeks to 2 weeks, which may be of palliative benefit in certain subsets of patients. This treatment regimen demonstrated a greater incidence of brain necrosis requiring surgical intervention; however, the 3 patients experiencing this toxicity had longer survival times. Future investigation may be useful to determine which fraction size may be optimal for GBM when highly conformal RT is used in the adjuvant setting.     

5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation in unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: Phase I-II dose-escalation study

PURPOSE: A Phase I-II dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the possible impact of the dose on response, toxicity, pain relief, and outcome in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 patients entered the study. The external beam radiotherapy (RT) dose was 39.6 Gy in the first 15 patients, 50.4 Gy in the next 15 patients, and 59.4 Gy in the remaining 20 patients, at five 1.8-Gy fractions weekly. During external beam RT, patients received concurrent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1-4 and 21-24). Patients were evaluated for toxic reactions, local disease control, survival, and pain relief. RESULTS: No treatment-related deaths occurred from acute toxicity. Four patients required a temporary treatment interruption because of acute hematologic (2 patients) or GI (2 patients) toxicity, not correlated with the delivered RT dose. Three patients (6%) developed late toxicity (duodenal ulcer in 2 and duodenal stenosis in 1). All patients who developed late toxicity had received a dose of 59.4 Gy. At univariate analysis, only the RT dose correlated significantly with the incidence of late toxicity (at 2 years, 39.6-50.4 Gy resulted in 0% and 59.4 Gy resulted in 58.2%; p = 0.023). At multivariate analysis, the RT dose also showed a trend with the incidence of late side effects (p = 0.052). Overall, 6 patients had a partial response (12%) and 44 (88%) had no change. The overall response rate was 8.0% (95% confidence interval, 1.5-20.5%). The rate of response was not different in the three groups. In-field locoregional disease progression was seen in 7 patients (14.0%). Distant relapse was documented in 34 patients (68.0%). None of analyzed variables, in particular, the RT dose delivered, showed a statistically significant correlation with objective response, local control, incidence of metastasis, disease-free survival, or overall incidence of pain symptoms after therapy. The whole group median survival was 9 months. The actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 31.3%, 2.8%, and 0.0%, respectively. None of analyzed parameters correlated significantly with survival at univariate or multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In a Phase I-II study, the association of high RT doses with the incidence of severe toxicity in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma was confirmed. Furthermore, this dose-escalation study did not document a clearcut correlation, using 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation, between the radiation dose and clinical outcome.     

Phase I trial of preoperative hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with incorporated boost and oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and an incorporated boost with concurrent capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The eligibility criteria included adenocarcinoma of the rectum, T3-T4 and/or N1-N2 disease, performance status 0 or 1, and age > or =18 years. Photon IMRT and an incorporated boost were used to treat the whole pelvis to 45 Gy and the gross tumor volume plus 2 cm to 55 Gy in 25 treatments within 5 weeks. The study was designed to escalate the dose to the gross tumor volume in 5-Gy increments in 3-patient cohorts. Capecitabine was given orally 825 mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days each week during RT. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated radiation dose, and the secondary endpoints were the pathologic response and quality of life. RESULTS: Eight patients completed RT at the initial dose level of 55 Gy. The study was discontinued because of toxicity-six Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 3 (38%) of 8 patients. All patients went on to definitive surgical resection, and no patient had a pathologically complete response. CONCLUSION: This regimen, using hypofractionated RT with an incorporated boost, had unacceptable toxicity despite using standard doses of capecitabine and IMRT. Additional research is needed to determine whether IMRT is able to reduce the side effects during and after pelvic RT with conventional dose fractionation.     

Phase I study of hypofractionated dose-escalated thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three radiotherapy regimens were used. Radiotherapy was given in two phases: patients initially received 20 Gy in 10 fractions to gross tumor plus uninvolved mediastinal nodes, followed by a boost to gross disease of 30, 38, or 42 Gy in 15 fractions. Radiotherapy was planned with conformal techniques. All patients received four cycles of cisplatin (25 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2) chemotherapy. Radiotherapy commenced with Day 1 of Cycle 2 of chemotherapy. All complete/near-complete responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation. The maximal tolerated dose of radiotherapy was based on the dose that caused unacceptably high rates of radiotherapy-related toxicity. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were accrued. All patients who commenced radiotherapy received all prescribed chemo- and radiotherapy. There were no treatment-related deaths. There was one Grade 3 acute nonhematologic toxicity in the 50-Gy group. Of the 6 patients given 58 Gy, 3 experienced acute Grade 3 esophagitis. With a median follow-up of 7 months, median overall survival was 9.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of thoracic radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy on this trial was 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions.     

Preoperative chemotherapy and pelvic radiation for tethered or fixed rectal cancer: a phase II dose escalation study

PURPOSE: To study the impact of preoperative radiation dose escalation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the outcome of tethered and fixed rectal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have treated 156 patients with 3 consecutive preoperative chemoradiation protocols with escalating treatment intensity. Schedule 1 consisted of 40 Gy radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and mitomycin C. Schedule 2 used a sandwich design with preoperative (40 Gy) and postoperative (18 Gy) radiation with concomitant 5-FU infusion, leucovorin, and mitomycin C. In schedule 3, the preoperative radiation dose was increased to 50 Gy and adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy was added following surgery. There were 54, 27, and 75 patients treated in schedules 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RESULTS: The resectability was 91% for schedule 1 and 100% for both schedules 2 and 3. A dose-response relationship was observed between the radiation dose and the tumor downstaging and local control. The pathological complete response (T0N0M0) rates for schedules 1, 2, and 3 were 4%, 15%, and 25%, respectively. The respective rates of tumor downstaging were 41%, 33%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year local relapse-free rates were 67% for schedule 1 (40 Gy), 96% for schedule 2 (58 Gy), and 92% for schedule 3 (50 Gy) (p = 0.0011). The addition of postoperative chemotherapy appeared to improve both the survival and the relapse-free survival. The 5-year survival was increased from 52% to 84% (p = 0.0004) and the 5-year progression-free survival was improved from 48% to 74% (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Preoperative 5-FU infusion, leucovorin, mitomycin C, and 50-Gy pelvic radiation, followed by postoperative bolus 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy, appeared to be an effective treatment for tethered/fixed rectal cancers. However, its therapeutic efficacy could only be validated in randomized studies.     

Phase I/II study of concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly cisplatin with radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

The optimal chemoradiation regimen for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been determined. In this phase I/II study, the use of twice-weekly paclitaxel concomitant with weekly cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated. Patients with stage III NSCLC (without pleural effusion or cervical lymphadenopathy) were treated with thoracic RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with concurrent weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of twice-weekly paclitaxel (starting dose of paclitaxel of 20 mg/m(2) increased in increments of 5 mg/m(2)) in successive cohorts of three to six patients until two or more patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) at a particular dose level. All patients were planned to be given a further two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5 after completion of RT. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study from two institutions. At a dose of paclitaxel 35 mg/m(2), two of four treated patients had DLTs (1 grade 3 oesophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 1 grade 3 oesophagitis and infection). The recommended dose was therefore determined to be 30 mg/m(2) and a total of 15 patients were enrolled in an expanded cohort at this level. The overall response rate for all patients was 64% (95% CI: 43-82%). The estimated median survival was 23.6 months with an estimated 1-year and 2-year survival of 72 and 49%, respectively. Paclitaxel can be safely given twice-weekly at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) in combination with weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) and thoracic RT (60 Gy), and this regimen has significant activity in stage III NSCLC.     

Evidence for efficacy without increased toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: early results of a Phase III randomized trial

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized trial to compare the GI and urogenital toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) for localized (confined to the organ), early-stage (T1-T2N0M0, TNM classification) carcinoma of the prostate, using a conventional (64 Gy in 32 fractions within 6.5 weeks) vs. a hypofractionated (55 Gy in 20 fractions within 4 weeks) schedule and to determine the efficacy of the respective treatment schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This report is based on an interim analysis of the first 120 consecutive patients in this Phase III trial after a median follow-up of 43.5 months (range 23-62). RT planning was based on two-dimensional CT data, and the treatment was delivered using a three- or four-field 6-23-MV photon technique. GI and urogenital toxicity (symptom questionnaires incorporating the subjective elements of the late effects of normal tissues-subjective, objective, management, analytic classification of late effects and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer sexual function questionnaire) were evaluated before RT and 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after RT completion. The efficacy of RT was assessed clinically (digital rectal examination and radiologic imaging) and biochemically (prostate-specific antigen assay) at baseline, and every 3 months for 2 years after RT and every 6 months subsequently. RESULTS: RT, whether conventional or hypofractionated, resulted in an increase in all six symptom categories used to characterize GI toxicity and in four of five symptom categories used to document urinary morbidity 1 month after therapy completion. Sexual dysfunction (based on limited data), which existed in more than one-third of patients before RT, also increased to just more than one-half of patients 1 month after RT. The increase in urinary toxicity after RT was not sustained (diurnal urinary frequency had decreased significantly at 2 years). In contrast, all six symptom categories of GI toxicity remained increased 1 year after RT. Four of the six GI symptom categories (rectal pain, mucous discharge, urgency of defecation, and rectal bleeding) were still increased at 2 years compared with baseline. Except for a slightly greater percentage of patients experiencing mild rectal bleeding at 2 years among those who received hypofractionated RT, no differences were noted in toxicity between the conventional and hypofractionated RT schedule. The mean prostate-specific antigen level was 14.0 +/- 1.0 ng/mL at baseline and declined to a nadir of 1.3 +/- 0.2 ng/mL at a median of 16.8 months (range 0.8-28.3) after RT completion. However, it then rose in 17 patients (8 in the hypofractionated and 9 in the conventional treatment group). Only 8 of these 17 patients were found to have signs of clinical relapse (5 local, 1 regional lymph node, and 2 systemic [bony metastases]) after histopathologic and radiologic reassessment). The remaining 9 patients had biochemical relapse only (defined as three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen after nadir). The 4-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate was 85.8% for all patients and did not differ significantly between the two radiation dose schedules (86.2% for the hypofractionated and 85.5% for the conventional fractionation group). CONCLUSION: RT for prostate carcinoma, using a three- or four-field 6-23-MV photon technique without posterior shielding of the lateral fields, is an underestimated cause of persistent GI morbidity. The incidence of clinically significant GI and urogenital toxicity after conventional and hypofractionated RT appears to be similar. Hypofractionated RT for carcinoma of the prostate seems just as effective as conventional RT after a median follow-up approaching 4 years.