COVID‐19 in solid organ transplant recipients: No difference in survival compared to general population

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) may be associated with worse outcome in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We performed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID‐19, from March 15 to April 30, 2020, at two tertiary hospitals in Emilia‐Romagna Region. SOT recipients were compared with non‐SOT patients. Primary endpoint was all‐cause 30‐day mortality. Relationship between SOT status and mortality was investigated by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were assessed from COVID‐19 diagnosis to death or 30‐day whichever occurred first. Study cohort consisted of 885 patients, of them 24 SOT recipients (n = 22, kidney, n = 2 liver). SOT recipients were younger, had lower BMI, but higher Charlson Index. At admission they presented less frequently with fever and respiratory failure. No difference in 30‐day mortality between the two groups (19% vs 22.1%) was found; however, there was a trend toward higher rate of respiratory failure (50% vs 33.1%, P = .07) in SOT recipients. Superinfections were more represented in SOT recipients, (50% vs 15.5%, P < .001). At multivariate analysis adjusted for main covariates, there was no association between SOT and 30‐day mortality HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.39‐3.35) P = .79. Our data suggest that mortality among COVID‐19 SOT recipients is similar to general population.     

Metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease is associated with severity of COVID‐19

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has attracted increasing worldwide attention. While metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) affects a quarter of world population, its impact on COVID‐19 severity has not been characterized. We identified 55 MAFLD patients with COVID‐19, who were 1:1 matched by age, sex and obesity status to non‐aged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐infected patients without MAFLD. Our results demonstrate that in patients aged less than 60 years with COVID‐19, MAFLD is associated with an approximately fourfold increase (adjusted odds ratio 4.07, 95% confidence interval 1.20‐13.79, P = .02) in the probability for severe disease, after adjusting for confounders. Healthcare professionals caring for patients with COVID‐19 need to be aware that there is a positive association between MAFLD and severe illness with COVID‐19.     

Coronavirus disease 2019 and prevalence of chronic liver disease: A meta‐analysis

At present, there is scarce information regarding the global prevalence of chronic liver disease in individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) disease, which is becoming a global pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the overall prevalence of chronic liver disease among patients with COVID‐19 disease by meta‐analysing data in observational studies and to investigate the relationship between liver damage and COVID‐19 disease. We included 11 observational studies for a total of 2034 adult individuals (median age 49 years [IQR 45‐54], 57.2% men). The overall prevalence of chronic liver disease at baseline was 3% (95% CI 2%‐4%; I² = 29.1%). Individuals with severe COVID‐19 disease had relevant alterations of liver enzymes and coagulative profile, probably due to the innate immune response against the virus. Further studies are needed to better investigate the causes of liver injury in patients with COVID‐19 disease and the effect of treatment for COVID‐19 on the liver.     

Influence of immunosuppression on seroconversion against SARS‐CoV‐2 in two kidney transplant recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk for infectious complications due to chronic immunosuppression. The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in the United States has raised growing concerns for the transplant patient population. We seek to add to the current limited literature on COVID‐19 in transplant recipients by describing the clinical course of two kidney transplant recipients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection monitored by both RT‐PCR and serology. Through careful adjustment of their immunosuppression regimen, both patients had excellent recovery with intact graft function and development of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies.     

Hypertension,medications, and risk of severe COVID‐19: A Massachusetts community‐based observational study

It remains uncertain whether the hypertension (HT) medications angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) mitigate or exacerbate SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We evaluated the association of ACEi and ARB with severe coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) as defined by hospitalization or mortality among individuals diagnosed with COVID‐19. We investigated whether these associations were modified by age, the simultaneous use of the diuretic thiazide, and the health conditions associated with medication use. In an observational study utilizing data from a Massachusetts group medical practice, we identified 1449 patients with a COVID‐19 diagnosis. In our study, pre‐infection comorbidities including HT, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes were associated with increased risk of severe COVID‐19. Risk was further elevated in patients under age 65 with these comorbidities or cancer. Twenty percent of those with severe COVID‐19 compared to 9% with less severe COVID‐19 used ACEi, 8% and 4%, respectively, used ARB. In propensity score‐matched analyses, use of neither ACEi (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.81) nor ARB (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.55) was associated with increased risk of severe COVID‐19. Thiazide use did not modify this relationship. Beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and anticoagulant medications were not associated with COVID‐19 severity. In conclusion, cardiovascular‐related comorbidities were associated with severe COVID‐19 outcomes, especially among patients under age 65. We found no substantial increased risk of severe COVID‐19 among patients taking antihypertensive medications. Our findings support recommendations against discontinuing use of renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors to prevent severe COVID‐19.     

Liver transplant recipients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in the early postoperative period: Lessons from a single center in the epicenter of the pandemic

The impact of coronavirus disease‐19 (COVID‐19) in liver recipients remains largely unknown. Most data derive from small retrospective series of patients transplanted years ago. We aimed to report a single‐center case series of five consecutive patients in the early postoperative period of deceased‐donor liver transplantation who developed nosocomial COVID‐19. Two patients presented important respiratory discomfort and eventually died. One was 69 years old and had severe coronary disease. She rapidly worsened after COVID‐19 diagnosis on 9th postoperative day. The other was 67 years old with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis, who experienced prolonged postoperative course, complicated with cytomegalovirus infection and kidney failure. He was diagnosed on 36th postoperative day and remained on mechanical ventilation for 20 days, ultimately succumbing of secondary bacterial infection. The third, fourth, and fifth patients were diagnosed on 10th, 11th, and 18th postoperative day, respectively, and presented satisfactory clinical evolution. These last two patients were severely immunosuppressed, since one underwent steroid bolus for acute cellular rejection and another also used anti‐thymocyte globulin for treating steroid‐resistant rejection. Our novel experience highlights that COVID‐19 may negatively impact the postoperative course, especially in elder and obese patients with comorbidities, and draws attention to COVID‐19 nosocomial spread in the early postoperative period.     

Abnormal liver tests in patients hospitalized with Coronavirus disease 2019: Should we worry?

While several studies from China have reported COVID‐19‐related liver injury, there are currently no data on liver dysfunction in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients in Europe. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictive value of abnormal liver function in patients hospitalized with COVID‐19. This was a retrospective cohort study of confirmed COVID‐19 patients hospitalized in two referral hospitals in France. Clinical, biological and radiological data were collected and analysed. In all, 234 patients confirmed to have COVID‐19 by RT‐PCR were included. Liver function was abnormal in 66.6% of patients on admission. In multivariate logistic regression, abnormal liver test on admission were associated with in‐hospital aggravation (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.5‐10.8; P = .004) and mortality (OR 3.3; 95% CI = 1.04‐10.5; P = .04). This study of liver tests in a European COVID‐19 population confirms a high prevalence of abnormal liver tests on admission that are predictive of severe disease course and higher in‐hospital mortality.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with a normal or abnormal liver

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a novel coronavirus causing coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19), with an estimated 22 million people infected worldwide so far although involving primarily the respiratory tract, has a remarkable tropism for the liver and the biliary tract. Patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and no antecedent liver disease may display evidence of cytolytic liver damage, proportional to the severity of COVID‐19 but rarely of clinical significance. The mechanism of hepatocellular injury is unclear and possibly multifactorial. The clinical impact of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with underlying chronic liver disease, a cohort whose global size is difficult to estimate, has been assessed appropriately only recently and data are still evolving. Patients with cirrhosis are at higher risk of developing severe COVID‐19 and worse liver‐related outcomes as compared to those with non‐cirrhotic liver disease. OLT patients have an intermediate risk. Specific interventions in order to reduce the risk of transmission of infection among this high‐risk population have been outlined by international societies, together with recommendations for modified treatment and follow‐up regimens during the COVID‐19 pandemic. When a vaccine against SARS‐CoV‐2 becomes available, patients with fibrotic liver disease and those with OLT should be considered as prime targets for prophylaxis of COVID‐19, as all other highly susceptible subjects.     

Toxoplasmosis in non‐cardiac solid organ transplant recipients: A case series and review of literature

The risk of toxoplasmosis in high‐risk cardiac transplant recipients is well recognized prompting universal donor and candidate screening with administration of targeted post‐transplant chemoprophylaxis in high‐risk (D+/R?) cardiac transplant patients. In contrast, until recently, there have been neither well‐defined recommendations nor consensus regarding toxoplasmosis preventive strategies among non‐cardiac solid organ transplant recipients. We report 3 cases of post‐transplant toxoplasmosis in non‐cardiac transplant recipients (one lung and two liver); all 3 infections presumed to be donor‐derived. Not surprisingly, pre‐transplant Toxoplasma serology was negative in all the patients. None of the patients were on trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX) prophylaxis at the time of diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The median time from transplant to onset of infection was 90 days (range: 30‐120 days). Clinical presentations included cerebral (n = 1) and disseminated infections (n = 2). Two of the 3 patients, both with disseminated infection died (mortality ~ 67%).     

Threatening drug‐drug interaction in a kidney transplant patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)

During the novel coronavirus pandemic, organ transplant recipients represent a frail susceptible category due to long‐term immunosuppressive therapy. For this reason, clinical manifestations may differ from general population and different treatment approaches may be needed. We present the case of a 36‐year‐old kidney‐transplanted woman affected by Senior‐Loken syndrome diagnosed with COVID‐19 pneumonia after a contact with her positive mother. Initial symptoms were fatigue, dry cough, and coryza; she never had fever nor oxygen supplementation. Hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir were started, and the antiviral drug was replaced with darunavir/cobicistat after 2 days for diarrhea. Immunosuppressant levels were closely monitored, and we observed very high tacrolimus trough levels despite initial dose reduction. The patient was left with steroid therapy alone. The peculiarity of clinical presentation and the management difficulties represent the flagship of our case report. We stress the need for guidelines in transplant recipients with COVID‐19 infection with particular regard to the management of therapy.     

Liver injury is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of retrospective studies

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak is a major threat to human beings. Lung injury has been reported as the major outcome of COVID‐19 infection. However, liver damage has also been considered to occur in severe cases. The current meta‐analysis of retrospective studies was carried out to summarize available findings on the association between liver injury and severity of COVID‐19 infection. Online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to detect relevant publications up to 1 April 2020, using relevant keywords. To pool data, a fixed‐ or random‐effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity between studies. Furthermore, publication bias test and sensitivity analysis were also applied. In total, 20 retrospective studies with 3428 COVID‐19 infected patients (severe cases, n = 1455; mild cases, n = 1973), were included in this meta‐analysis. Higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (weighted mean difference, 8.84 U/L; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.97 to 11.71; P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (weighted mean difference, 7.35 U/L; 95% CI, 4.77 to 9.93; P < 0.001), total bilirubin (weighted mean difference, 2.30 mmol/L; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.36; P < 0.001), and lower serum levels of albumin (weighted mean difference, ?4.24 g/L; 95% CI, ?6.20 to ?2.28; P < 0.001) were associated with a significant increase in the severity of COVID‐19 infection. The incidence of liver injury, as assessed by serum analysis (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and albumin levels), seems to be higher in patients with severe COVID‐19 infection.     

Evolution of fibrosis during HCV recurrence after liver transplantation – influence of IL‐28B SNP and response to peg‐IFN and ribavirin treatment

The IL‐28 gene is associated with sustained viral response (SVR) after treatment with peg‐IFN and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection. We analysed the importance of recipient and donor IL‐28B genotype for response to treatment and fibrosis progression in 54 liver transplant recipients. Fibrosis stage (F) was defined as mild when F ≤ 2 and severe when F ≥ 3 in a liver biopsy or according to liver elasticity analysis. We found a significantly lower prevalence of IL‐28B SNP CC in the recipients (22%) than in the donors (67%), P < 0.0001. SVR was seen in 61% of the recipients with mild and 27% with severe fibrosis pretreatment, P = 0.01. Recipients with IL‐28 CC and non‐CC had mild fibrosis in 64% and 38% prior to treatment, P = 0.13. At follow‐up, after treatment, significantly more recipients with CC had mild fibrosis than non‐CC recipients (75% versus 32%, P = 0.0072), and all with CC and SVR had mild fibrosis. The strongest baseline factor predicting SVR was genotype. Hence, 13/19 (68%) genotype non‐1 patients reached SVR versus only 9/35 (26%) genotype 1 patients, P = 0.0022. In summary, we found that liver transplant recipients with IL‐28B CC tended to have less advanced fibrosis prior to and significantly less after SOC treatment and that all recipients with IL‐28B CC who achieved SVR had mild fibrosis at follow‐up. A significantly higher SVR rate was achieved in recipients with mild than severe fibrosis pretreatment and with genotype non‐1 than 1 infection. Our findings indicate that treatment for post‐transplant HCV recurrence should be offered before advanced fibrosis is seen in the recipient.     

A territory‐wide study on the impact of COVID‐19 on diabetes‐related acute care

Diabetes is a risk factor for the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Little is known how the COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted diabetes‐related acute care. We compared hospitalization rates for severe hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia during the COVID‐19 outbreak in Hong Kong (study period: 25 January to 24 April 2020) with those during 25 January to 24 April 2019 (inter‐year control) and 25 October 2019 to 24 January 2020 (intra‐year control), using Poisson regression analysis. Hospitalization rates abruptly decreased after the first confirmed local COVID‐19 case on 23 January 2020, by 27% and 23% compared with the inter‐year and intra‐year control periods, respectively (incidence rate ratio 0.73 and 0.77, P < 0.001). Hospitalizations were reduced for severe hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, but not diabetic ketoacidosis. This significant reduction in hospitalization rates should alert endocrinologists to take proactive measures to optimize glycemic control of individuals with diabetes.     

Successful recovery from COVID‐19 in three kidney transplant recipients who received convalescent plasma therapy

Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is a highly infectious, rapidly spreading viral disease that typically presents with greater severity in patients with underlying medical conditions or those who are immunosuppressed. We present a novel case series of three kidney transplant recipients with COVID‐19 who recovered after receiving COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) therapy. Physicians should be aware of this potentially useful treatment option. Larger clinical registries and randomized clinical trials should be conducted to further explore the clinical and allograft outcomes associated with CCP use in this population.     

Hepatitis B reactivation after kidney transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen‐negative,core antibody‐positive recipients

Nowadays, intensive immunosuppressive therapy including rituximab is commonly used prior to kidney transplantation (KT), raising concerns over hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative and anti‐hepatitis B core (HBc)‐positive KT recipients. Recent practice guidelines suggested watchful monitoring or antiviral prophylaxis for the first 6‐12 months, the period of maximal immunosuppression. However, the actual risk for HBV reactivation, and whether short‐term antiviral therapy in the early period is necessary, remains unclear. A total of 449 HBsAg‐negative and anti‐HBc‐positive KT recipients were analysed for HBV reactivation. During a median follow‐up of 6.7 (interquartile range: 4.2‐9.4) years, HBV reactivation was observed in 9 patients (2.0%). The median time of HBV reactivation from KT was 2.8 years (range: 1.4‐11.5 years), with cumulative incidence rates of 0%, 1% and 2% for 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. There were no severe adverse outcomes, including liver transplantation or mortality related to HBV reactivation. The risk of HBV reactivation was not high, even in anti‐HBs‐negative patients (n = 60, 4% at 5 years), ABO mismatch (n = 92, 4% at 5 years), use of rituximab (n = 66, 3% at 5 years) or plasmapheresis (n = 17, 7% at 5 years), and acute rejection (n = 169, 3% at 5 years). In conclusion, the HBV reactivation risk was not high and the time of detection was not clustered in the early post‐KT period. Our findings favour continued watchful monitoring over antiviral prophylaxis in the early period.     

Use of distinct anti‐hypertensive drugs and risk for COVID‐19 among hypertensive people: A population‐based cohort study in Southern Catalonia,Spain

The use of some anti‐hypertensive drugs in the current COVID‐19 pandemic has become controversial. This study investigated possible relationships between anti‐hypertensive medications use and COVID‐19 infection risk in the ambulatory hypertensive population. This is a population‐based retrospective cohort study involving 34 936 hypertensive adults >50 years in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain) who were retrospectively followed through pandemic period (from 01/03/2020 to 30/04/2020). Two data sets including demographic/clinical characteristics (comorbidities and cardiovascular medications use) and laboratory PCR codes for COVID‐19 were linked to construct an anonymized research database. Cox regression was used to calculate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and estimate the risk of suffering COVID‐19 infection. Across study period, 205 PCR‐confirmed COVID‐19 cases were observed, which means an overall incidence of 586.8 cases per 100 000 persons‐period. In multivariable analyses, only age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02‐1.05; P < .001) and nursing home residence (HR: 19.60; 95% CI: 13.80‐27.84; P < .001) appeared significantly associated with increased risk of COVID‐19. Considering anti‐hypertensive drugs, receiving diuretics (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.90‐1.67; P = .205), calcium channel blockers (HR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.91‐1.82; P = .148), beta‐blockers (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.68‐1.37; P = .844), and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61‐1.13; P = .238) did not significantly alter the risk of PCR‐confirmed COVID‐19, whereas receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers was associated with an almost statistically significant reduction risk (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.44‐1.01; P = .054). In conclusion, our data support that receiving renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors does not predispose for suffering COVID‐19 infection in ambulatory hypertensive people. Conversely, receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers could be related with a reduced risk.     

Discordant courses of COVID‐19 in a cohabiting couple of lung transplant recipients

COVID‐19 is a novel infectious disease caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 that emerged in late 2019 and which is now a pandemic. Solid organ transplant recipients are perceived to be at increased risk of severe COVID‐19 due to their chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) and to their associated conditions. Scarce data are available on the optimized management of ISDs in these patients and on its impact on presentation, clinical course, viral shedding, and outcome. We report here two cases of COVID‐19 in a cohabiting couple of lung transplant recipients for cystic fibrosis, who had different ISDs management and who developed discordant courses of their disease. Our findings suggest that the degree of their immunosuppression might be a reason for their different course and that ISDs might prove partially protective.     

Retrospective case analysis of antiviral therapies for HHV‐6 encephalitis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV‐6) is one of the most common causes of encephalitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There are no FDA‐approved treatments specifically for HHV‐6 encephalitis; HHV‐6 disease is typically treated with CMV antivirals. A review of antiviral medications used to treat HHV‐6 encephalitis was conducted by aggregating data from case reports found on PubMed. Articles were included if they examined at least one HCT patient diagnosed with HHV‐6 encephalitis and described their treatment course and outcome. Key data were abstracted from 123 cases described in 52 studies. The proportion of patients with encephalitis who died or developed sequelae was 63.6% among ganciclovir monotherapy recipients (n = 44), 55.3% among foscarnet monotherapy recipients (n = 47), and 37.5% among recipients of combination therapy with foscarnet and ganciclovir (n = 32). Logistic regression revealed that recipients of foscarnet (OR 4.286, 95% CI 1.235‐14.877, P = .022) and ganciclovir (OR 5.625, 95% CI 1.584‐19.975, P = .008) monotherapies were more likely to develop sequelae compared to recipients of combination therapy, respectively. In multivariate analyses, non‐cord blood transplant was identified as an independent risk factor for developing sequelae after receiving ganciclovir monotherapy (OR 5.999, 95% CI 1.274‐28.254, P = .023). There was no difference in mortality between patients who received combination therapy and those who received monotherapy. In conclusion, combination therapy with foscarnet and ganciclovir may reduce sequelae, but not mortality, secondary to HHV‐6 encephalitis.     

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 70 cases of coronavirus disease and concomitant hepatitis B virus infection: A multicentre descriptive study

The interaction between existing chronic liver diseases caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and COVID‐19 has not been studied. We analysed 70 COVID‐19 cases combined with HBV infection (CHI) to determine the epidemiological, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome. We investigated clinical presentation, imaging and laboratory parameters of COVID‐19 patients of seven hospitals from Jan 20 to March 20, 2020. Multivariate analysis was used to analyse risk factors for progression of patients with COVID‐19 combined with HBV infection. Compared with COVID‐19 without HBV infection (WHI) group, patients with dual infection had a higher proportion of severe/critically ill disease (32.86% vs. 15.27%, P = .000), higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and activated partial thromboplastin (APTT) [50(28‐69)vs 21(14‐30), P = .000; 40(25‐54) vs 23(18‐30), P = .000; 34.0(27.2‐38.7) vs 37.2(31.1‐41.4), P = .031]. The utilization rates of Arbidol and immunoglobulin were significantly higher than those in the co‐infected group [48.57% vs. 35.64%, P < .05; 21.43% vs. 8.18%, P < .001], while the utilization rate of chloroquine phosphate was lower (1.43% vs 14.00%, P < .05) in the co‐infected patients group. Age and c‐reactive protein (CRP) level were independent risk factors for recovery of patients with COVID‐19 combined with HBV infection. The original characteristics of COVID‐19 cases combined with HBV infection were higher rate of liver injury, coagulation disorders, severe/critical tendency and increased susceptibility. The elderly and patients with higher level of CRP were more likely to experience a severe outcome of COVID‐19.     

Pathophysiological mechanisms of liver injury in COVID‐19

The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has resulted in a world‐wide pandemic. Disseminated lung injury with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the main cause of mortality in COVID‐19. Although liver failure does not seem to occur in the absence of pre‐existing liver disease, hepatic involvement in COVID‐19 may correlate with overall disease severity and serve as a prognostic factor for the development of ARDS. The spectrum of liver injury in COVID‐19 may range from direct infection by SARS‐CoV‐2, indirect involvement by systemic inflammation, hypoxic changes, iatrogenic causes such as drugs and ventilation to exacerbation of underlying liver disease. This concise review discusses the potential pathophysiological mechanisms for SARS‐CoV‐2 hepatic tropism as well as acute and possibly long‐term liver injury in COVID‐19.