Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

Data are limited regarding the real‐world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and severe renal impairment (RI). We aimed to evaluate the performance of GLE/PIB in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5 in Taiwan. 108 chronic HCV patients with CKD stage 4 (n = 32) or 5 (n = 76) receiving GLE/PIB for 8‐12 weeks were retrospectively recruited at 4 academic centres in Taiwan. The effectiveness was determined by sustained virologic response at off‐therapy week 12 (SVR₁₂) for evaluable (EP) and per‐protocol populations (PP). The safety profiles were also assessed. By EP and PP analyses, the SVR₁₂ rate was 99.1% (107 of 108 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 94.9%‐99.8%) and 100% (107 of 107 patients; 95% CI: 96.5%‐100%). The SVR₁₂ rates were 100% (95% CI: 89.3%‐100%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 92.9%‐99.8%) in patients with CKD stage 4 and 5, respectively. One patient, who declined off‐therapy follow‐up after permanently discontinuing GLE/PIB at on‐treatment week 9 due to scheduled cardiac surgery, had nonvirologic failure. Sixteen (14.8%) patients had serious adverse events (AEs), which were judged not related to GLE/PIB. The three most common AEs were pruritus (19.4%), fatigue (15.7%) and nausea (13.9%). None had ≥3‐fold upper limit of normal for total bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase levels. None of the 9 patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection developed HBV‐associated hepatitis. In conclusion, GLE/PIB for 8‐12 weeks is effective and well‐tolerated in HCV patients with severe RI.     

Real‐world effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for mixed genotype hepatitis C infection: A multicenter pooled analysis in Taiwan

Data on direct‐acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment for mixed genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are scant. This study examined the effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for mixed HCV genotype infection in a real‐world setting in Taiwan. We analysed the data from all patients with mixed HCV genotype infections treated with GLE/PIB or LDV/SOF from 2017 to 2019 in three Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Taiwan. The primary treatment outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment cessation (SVR12). Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. A total of 5190 HCV patients received DAA treatment during this time period. Among them, 116 patients (2.2%) had mixed infections of any 2 or 3 genotypes of 1a, 1b, 2, 3 and 6. Fifty‐four patients received GLE/PIB and 62 received LDV/SOF. SVR12 rates for LDV/SOF vs GLE/PIB therapy were 96.6% (56/58) vs 100% (51/51) by the per‐protocol analysis and 90.3% (56/62) vs 94.4% (51/54) by the evaluable population analysis. Two patients with 1b + 6 and 1b + 2 genotype infections in the LDV/SOF group had relapse. Evaluating the GLE/PIB vs LDV/SOF groups for the most common AEs revealed pruritus (16.7% vs 4.8%), abdominal discomfort (5.6% vs 8%) and fatigue (5.6% vs 4.8%). One patient with AE‐related treatment discontinuation presented with liver decompensation after 4‐week GLE/PIB therapy. DAA‐related significant laboratory abnormalities occurred in two patients with >3× elevated bilirubin level in the GLE/PIB group. GLE/PIB and LDV/SOF are well tolerated and achieve high SVR12 rates for patients with mixed HCV genotype infection.     

Glecaprevir + pibrentasvir (ABT493 + ABT-530) for the treatment of Hepatitis C

Introduction: Glecaprevir (formerly ABT-493, pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530, pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor) are second generation direct acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C (HCV). It is a fixed dose ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen with activity against genotypes (GT) 1–6. In vitro the two antivirals have synergistic activity with a high barrier to resistance and potent activity against common polymorphisms. It is once daily oral dosing with minimal absorption, primary biliary excretion, and negligible renal excretion, making it safe for patients with renal impairment. This regimen is being reviewed because it is the first pangenotypic regimen suitable for those with renal impairment and prior DAA failure.

Areas covered: The key phase 2 and 3 trials which investigated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are reviewed by methodology, primary end point, baseline demographic data, response rates, and adverse events. Literature search methodology involved reviewing key abstracts presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and European Association for the Study of Liver.

Expert commentary: The advantages and limitations of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir will be reviewed in comparison to its competitor drug on the market.     

Real‐world experiences with direct‐acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C treatment

As direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) agents become more readily available for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, it is important to understand real‐world treatment experiences. In order to assess the effectiveness of DAA regimens and factors that influence sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system, we retrospectively identified veterans with chronic hepatitis C who were treated with DAAs from January 2014 to June 2015. We determined SVR rates and collected data on demographics, genotype (GT), previous interferon‐based treatment, antiviral regimens, and co‐morbidities (HIV, prior solid organ transplant, haemodialysis) for analysis. Of 15 720 veterans, the majority were infected with genotype 1a (GT1a, 60.5%). Excluding the special populations, the overall cohort SVR rate was 92%. Compared to treatment‐experienced patients, treatment‐naïve patients had significantly higher SVR rates (90% vs 92%, P = .006). Subgroups associated with lower likelihood of achieving SVR‐included African Americans (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69‐0.91), GT3 (OR 0.65, CI 0.50‐0.86), and cirrhosis (OR 0.91, CI 0.84‐0.99) or decompensated cirrhosis (ascites: OR 0.78, CI 0.67‐0.91, variceal bleed: OR 0.75, CI 0.57‐0.99). The only treatment regimen independently associated with lower SVR rates was SOF+RBV+IFN (OR 0.65, CI 0.50‐0.84). Special populations achieved high SVR rates: HIV 92%, haemodialysis 93%, liver transplant 96% and renal transplant 94%. In conclusion, overall SVR rates were comparable to those reported in clinical trials and carried over to historically more difficult‐to‐treat patients. Several patient‐ and treatment‐related factors were identified as independent predictors of treatment failure and suggest subgroups to target for efforts to improve therapeutic strategies.     

Low incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation and subsequent hepatitis in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving direct‐acting antiviral therapy

To determine the clinical characteristics of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing interferon‐free antihepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy, we examined HBV DNA in 25 HBV co‐infected patients and 765 patients with resolved HBV infection during and after treatment with direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Among those with HCV genotype 1, asunaprevir plus daclatasvir was administered to 160 patients, sofosbuvir (SOF) plus ledipasvir to 438 patients and paritaprevir plus ombitasvir and ritonavir to 25 patients. In total, 167 patients with genotype 2 were treated with SOF plus ribavirin. Three patients with an HBV DNA level ≥2000 IU/mL were treated with entecavir before anti‐HCV therapy, without reactivation of HBV. In 3 of 22 (12%) HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive patients with an HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL, the viral load increased during treatment. However, hepatitis flare did not occur in these patients. There was no significant difference in clinical history between patients with and without HBV reactivation. Among 765 patients with resolved HBV infection, HBV reactivation occurred in 1 (0.1%) patient after initial resolution, whose HBV DNA level spontaneously decreased after DAA therapy. We compared anti‐HBs titres at baseline with those at post‐DAA therapy in 123 patients without HBsAg. There was no significant difference in anti‐HBs levels between the two points (P = .79). In conclusion, HBV reactivation was rare in HBsAg‐negative patients treated with DAA therapy. Additionally, hepatitis did not occur in HBV‐reactivated patients with a baseline HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL before DAA therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment in Koreans with chronic hepatitis C: A retrospective study

Background and study aimsThe introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs has dramatically improved chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment. The pangenotype DAA therapy glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) was recently recommended for treating CHC in Korea. Unfortunately, given its recent introduction, little real-world data from a Korean population exists. We examined the effectiveness and safety of G/P treatment in Koreans with CHC.Patients and methodsWe analyzed CHC patients at Samsung Changwon Hospital from June 2018 to December 2020. Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR 12) was evaluated after treatment, and the associated factors were analyzed. Furthermore, the degree of liver fibrosis before and after treatment was compared to determine whether liver fibrosis improved.ResultsIn total, 102 patients were enrolled; 35.3 % had compensated liver cirrhosis (LC), and 11.8 % had received previous treatment. Of the 102 patients, 99 (97.1 %) reached SVR 12. Of the 81 patients who completed 8 weeks of G/P treatment, 80 (98.8 %) reached SVR 12, while 19 of the 21 (90.5 %) patients in the 12- or 16-week group reached SVR 12, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.107). As a secondary endpoint, liver fibrosis before and after treatment was also compared. The Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) (3.3 vs 2.8, P = 0.010), aspartate transaminase (AST)-platelet ratio index (APRI) (1.3 vs 1.0, P < 0.001), and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) (9.5 vs 4.6, P < 0.001) were significantly different after G/P treatment.ConclusionsRegardless of genotype, G/P treatment for Koreans with CHC is safe, highly effective, and can improve liver fibrosis.     

Evaluation of 8‐week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment in direct‐acting antiviral‐naïve noncirrhotic HCV genotype 1 and 2infected patients in a real‐world setting in Japan

Based on high efficacy and safety demonstrated in clinical trials, treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks is recommended for hepatitis C virus (HCV)–infected patients who are direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) naïve, genotype 1 or 2, and noncirrhotic. The aim of this study was to validate real‐world experience with 8‐week G/P treatment in Japan. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in 554 patients who underwent 8‐week treatment from among 1,022 patients who initiated G/P therapy. The majority (54.5%) were male, with a median age of 66 years, and HCV genotype distribution was genotype 1, 43.8%; genotype 2, 55.3%; and mixed subtype, 0.9%. Overall, the sustained virologic response rate at 12 weeks (SVR12) was 92.8% (530/571) in the intention‐to‐treat population and 99.3% (526/530) in the per‐protocol population. The SVR12 rates by subgroups were as follows: subtype 1a, 100% (6/6); 1b, 100% (189/189); 2a, 99.3% (150/151); 2b, 99.0% (103/104); and mixed subtype, 50% (2/4). Among four patients with virologic failure following 8‐week treatment with G/P, none had baseline polymorphisms or treatment‐emergent amino acid substitutions in NS3. However, 2 of 4 patients with virologic failure had treatment‐emergent amino acid substitutions in NS5A. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 21.5% of patients and 1.2% of patients discontinued due to drug‐related AEs. In conclusion, G/P treatment for 8 weeks was safe and effective for DAA‐naïve noncirrhotic genotype 1 or 2 patients in a real‐world clinical setting in Japan.     

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir + sofosbuvir for post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis C virus treatment

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in combination with sofosbuvir may serve as a safe and effective option for treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus post-liver transplant in patients who previously failed direct-acting antivirals.