Comparison of detection of antibody to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus by enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and Western blot methods.

There was 100% agreement between enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Abbott Laboratories), Western blot, and indirect immunofluorescence (IF) when these three methods were used to measure antibody to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) virus in sera from 142 high-risk individuals, indicating that IF was a sensitive alternative method for detecting antibody to this agent. Thirty-two (64%) of 50 EIA-positive plasma specimens from a blood bank and 6 (21%) of 28 EIA-positive sera from alternative testing sites were negative by IF. In addition, two EIA-negative sera from the latter group were positive by IF. Western blotting agreed with IF on those 40 specimens which gave discrepant results by EIA and IF. The IF method was determined to be equal to Western blotting in sensitivity and specificity for detection of AIDS antibody, and it was found to be useful for confirming positive EIA results, especially in specimens from individuals in low-risk groups.     

Performance evaluation of the Abbott HTLV III EIA, a test for antibody to HTLV III in donor blood

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA), designed to detect antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV III), was evaluated. The antibody test was found to be highly sensitive; serum from 221 of 223 (99.1%) patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) was positive for antibodies to HTLV III. In addition, the antibody test was found to be highly specific; approximately 99.75% of 20,720 serum or plasma samples from blood donors were negative for antibody to HTLV III. In most cases, the Western Blot analysis agreed well with the EIA. Eighty-one of 82 (98.8%) EIA-positive samples from patients with AIDS were Western Blot positive. Of the EIA-positive blood donors, 21 of 36 (58%) were detected and confirmed by Western Blot analysis. A solid-phase competitive EIA also was evaluated as an alternate procedure. The preliminary results indicate that this immunoassay has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and could serve as an alternate procedure to detect antibody to HTLV III.     

Evaluation of hepatitis C virus kits.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies were detected in 85.9% of the samples by commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits. Most EIA-positive samples were reactive (80%) by the RIBA HCV test (Ortho Diagnostics). Samples with optical density values greater than or equal to 2.0 were mostly reactive (87%) by RIBA HCV test, in contrast to those with values less than or equal to 1.0 (6.6%). Samples which were indeterminate by the RIBA HCV test were positive (88.4%) by HCV neutralization EIA (Abbott Laboratories), along with 29.4% of samples which were nonreactive by the RIBA HCV test.     

Anti-HCV RIBA/LiaTek reactivity and HCV genotype in EIA-negative patients with viremia.

Individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) usually produce anti-HCV antibodies detectable by enzyme immunoassay (EIA); however, in certain viremic cases this antibody does not appear. To investigate whether anti-HCV in these cases is detectable by Western blot (WB), 38 HCV RNA positive/anti-HCV EIA-negative sera were tested by RIBA 3.0 or LiaTek III. The HCV genotypes (INNO-LiPA) were analyzed to determine whether the variance in these genotypes can be the reason for the late, weak antibody production or its absence. As the control group, 282 EIA-positive/HCV RNA-positive patients were examined. A single band reactivity of various intensities by RIBA or LiaTek was observed in 16/38 EIA negative sera. Positive results with NS3 were detected in 4 sera and weak positive (+/-) with core, NS3, and NS5 in 5, 6, and 1 sera, respectively. In 3 cases with anti-NS3, the seroreversion was observed in follow-up. The distribution of genotypes in anti-HCV-negative versus anti-HCV-positive groups was: 1b alone, 50.0% vs. 78.0%; 3a alone, 13.2% vs. 15.6%; and mixed (1b+3a), 36.8% vs. 5.0%, respectively. The follow-up studies showed that viremia was lost spontaneously in 12/35 patients. In some patients infected with two genotypes, the spontaneous loss of the 3a genotype was observed. The study showed that WB tests are useful for serological confirmation of HCV infection in some EIA negative/HCV RNA-positive patients but, because seroreversion may occur, sequential sera samples should be tested. No unusual HCV genotype was detected in anti-HCV-negative/HCV RNA-positive cases, but the frequency of mixed infection with the 1b+3a genotypes in this group was found to be higher than that in anti-HCV-positive hepatitis patients.     

Association of hepatitis C virus carrier state with the occurrence of hepatitis C virus core antibodies.

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was developed for the determination of antibodies against the "putative" core protein of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Antigens used were recombinant fragments (amino acids 6-77 or 6-143) of the HCV core protein, produced in Escherichia coli with truncated hepatitis B core (HBc) as fusion protein. Evaluation of 385 sera positive for HCV antibodies by first generation EIA, revealed 98 (25.4%) with HCV core antibodies. HCV-RNA, determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was exclusively found in the sera positive for HCV core antibodies (89 PCR positives). In random screening of 3,708 sera, 3 sera with HCV core antibodies were found PCR positive. Only 2 of these sera were positive in the first generation EIA. It is concluded that HCV core antibody determination is a reliable test for identifying HCV carriers among blood donors.     

A comparison between one first generation and three second generation anti-HCV ELISAs: an investigation in high- and low-risk subjects in correlation with recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction

One first generation assay (manufactured by Ortho, test I) and 3 second generation anti-HCV ELISAs (manufactured by Ortho, Abbott, and UBI, tests II-IV) were compared. Sera from 4 different sources were used: (1) intravenous drug-users (IVDUs, n = 50), (2) blood donors (n = 1055), (3) all clinical samples from one day of routine anti-HCV testing (n = 89), (4) hemodialysis patients previously found negative by test I but clinically suspected to have a HCV infection (n = 11). Confirmatory anti-HCV tests were carried out with a second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II). In sera positive exclusively by test IV, one antibody consumption test (UBI HCV Neutralization EIA) and one further immunoblot assay (INNO-LIA HCV Ab) were used. PCR for HCV RNA was carried out on all hemodialysis patient sera and in the RIBA II positive blood donor sera. The second generation ELISAs discriminated 11 more positive samples than the first generation test (2 IVDUs, 5 blood donors, 4 clinical samples). The 9 sera from blood donors and clinical samples were all RIBA II positive or indeterminate. The second generation tests thus showed increased sensitivity. The second generation tests also showed increased specificity in that 4 samples that were positive by test I but negative by the second generation tests, were also negative by RIBA II. With few exceptions, all RIBA II-positive and most of the indeterminate samples were positive by the second generation ELISAs. With few exceptions, all the RIBA II-negative samples were negative by the second generation ELISAs. Eleven blood donor sera were positive by test IV exclusively where RIBA II and other supplementary assays were negative. The recently introduced second generation anti-HCV ELISAs were found to have a higher sensitivity than the first generation test. The tests also showed a good concordance with the exception of test IV in the group of blood donor sera.     

Significance of the confirmatory test of enzyme immunoassay and western blotting method in detection of anti-HTLV-1 in sera

In this study, we directly compared the sensitivity of the detection of anti-human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 (anti-HTLV-1) antibody in serum by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), gelatin particle agglutination method (PA), and Western blotting method (WB). Of 69 cases studied, 6 cases positive by WB were negative by both PA and EIA methods. Of these 6 cases, 5 cases were interpreted to be positive by the confirmatory test of EIA (inhibitory rates of greater than 50%). Thus, the results of the confirmatory test were most consistent with those of WB methods. We also determined the levels of anti-HTLV-1 antibody in sera from the babies born of anti-HTLV-1 positive mothers at various months of age by the above three methods. As ages progressed, a parallel decline in the levels of anti-HTLV-1 antibody was shown by the three methods. However, at the time when sera became negative by both PA and EIA methods, the antibody was still detected by WB method. The study concludes that both WB and confirmatory test of EIA are more sensitive indicators of HTLV-1 infection.     

Use of the Treponema pallidum-specific captia syphilis IgG assay in conjunction with the rapid plasma reagin to test for syphilis.

The Captia Syphilis IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was evaluated for use in conjunction with the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR) as a method to test for syphilis. A total of 1,288 serum specimens were tested by the routine laboratory protocol of the RPR followed by microhemagluttination assay for Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP) testing of RPR-reactive sera as well as the EIA-RPR protocol in which the automated EIA followed by a manual RPR test for EIA-positive specimens is used. When using the routine protocol, 131 specimens were initially reactive by the RPR, and 113 of these were reactive by MHA-TP. When using the EIA-RPR protocol, 170 specimens were initially positive by EIA, and of these, 112 were RPR reactive, indicating active disease. When compared to the routine protocol, the EIA-RPR protocol had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 96.5, 99.7, 97.3, and 99.7%, respectively. After resolution of discrepancies by additional testing, the adjusted sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100, 99.8, 98.3, and 100%, respectively. This evaluation demonstrates that when used in conjunction with the RPR, the Captia Syphilis EIA is a reliable method by which to test for syphilis.     

Evaluation of the performance of the EIAgen HCV test for detection of hepatitis C virus infection

The EIAgen HCV test (Adaltis Inc., Montreal, Canada) is an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies. This study compared the performance of this test side-by-side with the current Ortho HCV 3.0 Anti-HCV assay (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company, Raritan, NY, USA). Among 2559 specimens examined, 178 were true positives, 2376 were true negatives and 5 were indeterminate. The sensitivity of the EIAgen HCV test was 100%, versus 98.3% for the Ortho HCV test, while their respective specificities were 98.1% and 98.2%. The EIAgen HCV test gave a positive predictive value of 79.8% and a negative predictive value of 100%. Overall, the concordance of this test with the Ortho HCV test was 98.2%. Specimens from potentially interfering substances, such as sera from pregnant women, sera from patients with acute non-C hepatitis, autoimmune diseases, lipidemia, or from patients undergoing hemolysis, showed no interference with either EIA. An EIAgen HCV test signal-to-cut-off ratio of >5.9 would be highly predictive of a true-positive finding in these specimens. The EIAgen HCV test is well suited for screening blood and blood products in antibodies to HCV.     

Histoplasmosis-associated cross-reactivity in the BioRad Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay

We observed false-positive results in the Platelia Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) for specimens from patients with histoplasmosis and mice with experimental infection. Platelia Aspergillus EIA-positive specimens were negative in the second-generation Histoplasma antigen EIA. Care must be taken to exclude histoplasmosis for patients with positive Platelia Aspergillus EIA results.     

Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection using two second-generation enzyme immunoassays with a recombinant immunoblot assay for confirmation

A total of 1,016 serum samples from patients with either non-A, non-B hepatitis or risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were examined in two second-generation enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), the UBI HCV EIA (Organon Teknika, The Netherlands) and the Wellcozyme anti-HCV (Murex Diagnostics, UK), for detection of antibodies to HCV. An immunoblot assay that uses four recombinant antigens, the 4-RIBA (Chiron, USA), was used as a confirmatory assay. Of the 1,016 samples, 195 (19.2 %) were reactive in both EIAs, while ten yielded discrepant results. One hundred eighty of the 195 (92 %) positive reactions were confirmed in the 4-RIBA; 13 sera yielded an indeterminate result and two were negative. None of the sera with discrepant results reacted positively in the confirmatory test, while two sera showed an indeterminate pattern. In contrast to the screening of antibodies to HCV among blood donors, confirmatory testing of antibodies to HCV with the 4-RIBA seems to have limited added value in the diagnostic examination of clinical samples from patients with suspected HCV infection.     

Evaluation of a commercially available second-generation immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.

We evaluated a commercially available second-generation anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Cobas Core Anti-Helicobacter pylori EIA; Roche S. A., Basel, Switzerland) for serodiagnosis of H. pylori infection. The results of the assay were assessed in relation to the results of bacterial culture, urease testing, and histological Giemsa stain of gastric biopsy specimens from 1,134 patients with a variety of symptoms relating to the upper gastrointestinal tract. H. pylori was detected in biopsy specimens from 660 (58.2%) patients: 6 had a normal mucosa, 123 had chronic gastritis only, and 531 were found to have chronic active gastritis by histology; endoscopy showed duodenal and gastric ulcers in 137 and 64 patients of the last two groups, respectively. The test was evaluated with different age and ethnic groups. The prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, (i) for Belgian patients between 18 and 40 years old, 34, 93, 95, 91, and 96%; (ii) for Belgian patients more than 40 years old, 53, 96, 91, 93, and 95%; and (iii) the Mediterranean patients more than 17 years old, 87, 94, 70, 95, and 64%. All sera showing discordant immunoassay results compared with the results of histology and culture of biopsy specimens, as well as those with borderline immunoassay results, were tested further by immunoblotting. Among the EIA results considered false negative, we demonstrated an absence of seroconversion in 14 of 19 patients tested by immunoblotting. Among the EIA results considered false positive, immunoblotting showed the presence of specific antibodies in 28 of 37 patients tested. Among the borderline results obtained in the first assay with 22 patients' sera, a second assay showed positive results in 10 patients (8 were positive by immunoblotting) and negative reactions in 10 patients (9 were negative by immunoblotting), whereas 2 remained borderline. These data indicate that sera showing borderline immunoassay results must be tested again. In conclusion, this commercially available second-generation EIA, which is easy and quick to perform, was found highly reliable for the serodiagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Smallpox: residual antibody after vaccination

Of all the microorganisms and toxins, poxviruses (Orthopoxvirus) have the greatest potential for use by terrorists. These viruses can spread rapidly through the environment following initial infection. In 1980, the World Health Organization Eradication Program discontinued vaccination for smallpox and declared that the disease had been eliminated. With the threat of smallpox virus as a bioterrorism weapon, questions have been asked about the persistence of protection (as offered by antibodies) following vaccination with vaccinia virus vaccine. To address this, sera from 204 adults vaccinated as children were tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the presence of vaccinia virus antibody. Of the 204 individuals whose sera were examined for the presence of vaccinia antibody, 165 (80.9%) had been vaccinated once and 39 (19.1%) had been vaccinated at least twice. Of the 165 sera from individuals vaccinated once, 112 (67.9%) were positive. Of the 39 sera from individuals vaccinated more than once, 31 (79.5%) were positive. The presence of a vaccination scar at the time of blood collection was not determined. Fifty-six nonvaccinated individuals, under 30 years of age, were tested by EIA; four of these (7.1%) were positive for vaccinia virus antibody by EIA. Forty-four EIA-positive and 16 EIA-negative sera were also tested by serum neutralization (SN) as a comparison with the EIA test results; one serum (negative by EIA) was SN positive. No attempt was made to ascertain any demographics other than age (date of birth) and "remembered" times of vaccination.     

Performance of the OraQuick HCV Rapid Antibody Test for Screening Exposed Patients in a Hepatitis C Outbreak Investigation

During a nosocomial hepatitis C outbreak, emergency public clinics employed the OraQuick HCV rapid antibody test on site, and all results were verified by a standard enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Of 1,157 persons, 1,149 (99.3%) exhibited concordant results between the two tests (16 positive, 1,133 negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94.1%, 99.5%, 72.7%, and 99.9%, respectively. OraQuick performed well as a screening test during an outbreak investigation and could be integrated into future hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreak testing algorithms.     

Evaluation of specificity of EIA kit (ED-007)

EIA (Eitest: Eisai) and Gelatin Particle Agglutination: PA (SERODIA: Fujirebio) assays were performed for the detection of HTLV-I antibodies with 10,780 sera from patients since 1986. Eleven point five percent were reactive by both EIA and PA, while 1.1% was PA(+), EIA(-), these PA false positive occurred on low titer. Conversely 0.2% on EIA positive seems PA false negative because of Western blot (WB) positivity. Zero point nine percent was EIA(+), PA(-), of these 80.6% were not inhibited by EIA confirmatory test. The main cause of EIA false positive was due to reactivity of auto antibody with MT-2 cell lysate. We used new EIA (ED-007: Eisai) coated with HTLV-I antigen purified from supernatant of culture medium of MT-2 cell. The results completely matched with EIA confirmatory test and WB. Cut off index value of sera from SLE patients were down to 0.2 (mean +/- SD) from 0.7 +/- 0.4 of Eitest ATL. EIA (ED-007) are probably useful and more specific assays for the detection of HTLV-I antibodies, especially, the sera of patients with autoimmune diseases.     

Potential Impact of Different Cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM Assays on an Algorithm Requiring IgM Reactivity as a Criterion for Measuring CMV IgG Avidity

The measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity is a powerful tool for identifying individuals with recent CMV infection. Because such patients are expected to be positive for CMV IgM, several investigators have suggested that CMV IgG-positive sera first be screened for CMV IgM and then only the IgM-reactive sera be tested for avidity. We investigated the impact of different CMV IgM assays on such a reflexing algorithm using a panel of 369 consecutive IgG-positive serum samples submitted for avidity testing. A bead-based immunofluorescent assay (BIFA) identified 105 IgM-positive serum samples, whereas an IgM-capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) identified 48 IgM-positive serum samples; this marked difference led us to evaluate additional CMV IgM assays. An enzyme-linked immunofluorescent assay (ELFA) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) were used to test all sera with discordant BIFA/EIA results, all sera with concordant positive results, and selected sera with concordant negative results. The findings indicated that the ELFA would identify 74 CMV IgM-positive samples and the CIA would identify 64. Of the 23 low-avidity serum samples, 2 were IgM negative by BIFA, 3 by ELFA and CIA, and 4 by EIA; of the 23 intermediate-avidity serum samples, 6 were IgM negative by BIFA, 10 by ELFA, and 15 by EIA and CIA. In both these avidity groups, BIFA IgM-negative sera were also negative by the other 3 assays. These findings demonstrate that an algorithm requiring CMV IgM reactivity as a criterion for CMV IgG avidity testing does not identify all low-avidity sera and thus misses some cases of acute CMV infection.     

Hepatitis C testing. Comparison of Ortho's EIA and RIBA II tests in 1,182 patients undergoing primary liver transplantation.

Plasma samples from 1,182 patients undergoing primary liver transplantation were tested for anti-hepatitis C (HCV) virus by two methods: Ortho HCV ELISA Test System (EIA) and Chiron RIBA HCV Test System (RIBA II). The EIA results, 0 or +, were recorded first, followed by RIBA results, N = negative, P = positive, or I = indeterminate. Concordant results--0N, + P, + I--were found in 1,076 (91%), and discordant results were found in 106 (9%). The EIA optical density did not relate to concordant or discordant results. Band patterns were described by stating the band position (1, 2, 3, or 4) and inserting a dash (-) if no band was visualized. Most + P samples fell into two patterns: 47% showed all four bands, pattern 1234, and 15% showed the two-band pattern, 34. When the EIA was negative, 0P, the opposite was seen: 8% showed the 1234 pattern and 81% showed the 34 pattern. There were 226 samples that formed bands (+ P, 149; 0P, 31; + I, 15; 0I, 31). The frequency of bands was as follows: 4, 32%; 3, 31%; 2, 19%; and 1, 18%. Band 2 and the EIA test detected antibodies to the same c100-3 fragment and showed 74% concordance. No explanation is apparent for the lower concordance rate here than that between the EIA test and bands 3 = 96% or 4 = 88%. The EIA and RIBA II tests, together with positive liver function tests and abnormal tissue pathologic findings, provide a basis for the diagnosis of HCV.     

Usefulness of the hepatitis C virus core antigen assay for screening of a population undergoing routine medical checkup

We studied the usefulness of the recently designed Trak-C assay for the detection and quantification of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) for the screening of HCV infection in 4,201 subjects selected from 74,150 consecutive volunteers undergoing routine medical checkups. Subjects were selected for screening because they had risk factors (group II, n = 321) and/or elevated alanine transaminase activity (group I, n = 3847). Initially, the anti-HCV antibody assay and the Trak-C assay were performed on each patient. Subsequently, the Trak-C assay was performed only when the anti-HCV enzyme immune assay (EIA) was positive. Positive samples were further evaluated for anti-HCV antibodies by a third-generation strip immunoblot assay and for HCV RNA. Four samples (1.2%) from group II and 113 (2.9%) from group I were anti-HCV EIA positive. We also tested 33 subjects who previously tested positive for anti-HCV in our medical center. Among the 150 anti-HCV EIA-positive samples, the HCV core Ag result was in accord with the HCV RNA result in 146 cases (97.3%). When the EIA result was positive, the HCV core Ag concentration and the HCV RNA load were correlated (r(2) = 0.78; P < 0.001). Four samples with low viral loads were Trak-C negative but HCV RNA positive. Among the 2,395 anti-HCV EIA-negative serum samples collected during the first part of the study, 17 (0.7%) were found to contain very low levels of HCV core Ag (<8.5 pg/ml, the cutoff value being 1.5 pg/ml). All these samples were HCV RNA negative and considered to be false positives. This was confirmed by HCV core Ag neutralization analysis. The HCV core Ag assay is a useful method in the screening strategy of HCV infection and provides a reliable means of distinguishing between current and cleared HCV infections that is well correlated with HCV RNA testing.