Barriers to Care and Comorbidities Along the U.S.-Mexico Border

Objective

While limited access to care is associated with adverse health conditions, little research has investigated the association between barriers to care and having multiple health conditions (comorbidities). We compared the financial, structural, and cognitive barriers to care between Mexican-American border residents with and without comorbidities.

Methods

We conducted a stratified, two-stage, randomized, cross-sectional health survey in 2009–2010 among 1,002 Mexican-American households. Measures included demographic characteristics; financial, structural, and cognitive barriers to health care; and prevalence of health conditions.

Results

Comorbidities, most frequently cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, were reported by 37.7% of participants. Controlling for demographics, income, and health insurance, six financial barriers, including direct measures of inability to pay for medical costs, were associated with having comorbidities (odds ratios [ORs] ranged from 1.7 to 4.1, p<0.05). The structural barrier of transportation (OR=3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.91, 6.97, p<0.001) was also associated with higher odds of comorbidities, as were cognitive barriers of difficulty understanding medical information (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.10, 2.66, p=0.017), being confused about arrangements (OR=1.82, 95% CI 1.04, 3.21, p=0.037), and not being treated with respect in medical settings (OR=1.63, 95% CI 1.05, 2.53, p=0.028). When restricting analyses to participants with at least one health condition (comparing one condition vs. having ≥2 comorbid conditions), associations were maintained for financial and transportation barriers but not for cognitive barriers.

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of adults reported comorbidities. Given the greater burden of barriers to medical care among people with comorbidities, interventions addressing these barriers present an important avenue for research and practice among Mexican-American border residents.Limited access to health care has been associated with a wide range of adverse health consequences including premature mortality^1,2 and increased risk for many common chronic conditions.^3–5 Despite prior research documenting associations between sustained lack of access and many health conditions independently,^6,7 very little research has described whether people with more than one health condition (i.e., comorbidities) experience greater barriers to obtaining health care.Prior research based on information from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey has further indicated that people with multiple chronic conditions incur far greater health-care costs (up to seven times as many) as patients with only one chronic condition.⁸ It is essential, therefore, to understand the barriers to care that are disproportionately faced by people with comorbidities who need ongoing care, particularly among populations at high risk for developing comorbidities.Populations at high risk for having multiple health conditions include most minority populations in the U.S. and, in particular, Hispanic people, the largest and most rapidly growing minority group in the U.S.⁹ For example, the largest subgroup of Hispanic people, Mexican-Americans, has been found to have the highest incidence (an estimated 33.2%) of metabolic syndrome,¹⁰ a cluster of risk factors placing people at higher risk for heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and stroke.¹¹ Although there is substantial variability among Hispanic subgroups, based on information from the National Health Interview Survey, Mexican-American populations have the poorest access to care and the lowest use of health services of all Hispanic subgroups.^12,13 An estimated 32% of Hispanic people in the U.S. do not have health insurance compared with 15% of non-Hispanic white people.¹⁴ Besides economic limitations, Hispanic populations often face additional barriers to accessing health services. Factors that have been reported to impede Hispanic populations from obtaining medical care include, but are not limited to, language and literacy barriers,^15–17 lack of transportation and geographic inaccessibility,^15,17 the perception of being treated without respect in medical settings, and the perception that they would have received better quality care if they belonged to a difference racial/ethnic group.¹⁸A valuable guiding framework for the current study that provides a comprehensive overview of modifiable factors associated with access to health care is the recently developed Health Care Access Barriers model, an evidence-based analytical framework developed by Carillo and colleagues.¹⁹ This model describes the assessment of three categories of barriers to health care (financial, structural, and cognitive) that have been shown to be associated with poor health outcomes.Given the limited access to health care and high risk for comorbidities, gaining insight into which financial, structural, and cognitive barriers to care are associated with comorbidities among Mexican-Americans can provide valuable information for preventive efforts. Therefore, based on information from a randomized household survey conducted in a large city along the U.S.-Mexico border, the primary aim of the current study was to compare barriers to health care of participants with and without comorbidities. We hypothesized that people reporting comorbidities would be disproportionately affected by financial, cognitive, and structural barriers to care.     

First Trimester Prenatal Care Initiation Among Hispanic Women Along the U.S.-Mexico Border

Background First trimester prenatal care (FTPNC) is associated with improved birth outcomes. U.S.-Mexico border Hispanic women have lower FTPNC than non-border or non-Hispanic women. This study aimed to identify (1) what demographic, knowledge and care-seeking factors influence FTPNC among Hispanic women in border counties served by five Healthy Start sites, and (2) what FTPNC barriers may be unique to this target population. Healthy Starts work to eliminate disparities in perinatal health in areas with high poverty and poor birth outcomes. Methods 403 Hispanic women of reproductive age in border communities of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas were surveyed on knowledge and behaviors related to prenatal care (PNC) and basic demographic information. Chi square analyses and logistic regressions were used to identify important relationships. Results Chi square analyses revealed that primiparous women were significantly less likely to start FTPNC than multiparous women (χ² = 6.8372, p = 0.0089). Women with accurate knowledge about FTPNC were more likely to obtain FTPNC (χ² = 29.280, p < .001) and more likely to have seen a doctor within the past year (χ² = 5.550, p = .018). Logistic regression confirmed that multiparity was associated with FTPNC and also that living in Texas was negatively associated with FTPNC (R² = 0.066, F(9,340) = 2.662, p = .005). Among 27 women with non-FTPNC, barriers included late pregnancy recognition (n = 19) and no medical insurance (n = 5). Conclusions This study supports research that first time pregnancies have lower FTPNC, and demonstrated a strong association between delayed PNC and late pregnancy recognition. Strengthened investments in preconception planning could improve FTPNC in this population.

     

The U.S.-Mexico Border Infectious Disease Surveillance project: establishing bi-national border surveillance

In 1997, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Mexican Secretariat of Health, and border health officials began the development of the Border Infectious Disease Surveillance (BIDS) project, a surveillance system for infectious diseases along the U.S.-Mexico border. During a 3-year period, a binational team implemented an active, sentinel surveillance system for hepatitis and febrile exanthems at 13 clinical sites. The network developed surveillance protocols, trained nine surveillance coordinators, established serologic testing at four Mexican border laboratories, and created agreements for data sharing and notification of selected diseases and outbreaks. BIDS facilitated investigations of dengue fever in Texas-Tamaulipas and measles in California-Baja California. BIDS demonstrates that a binational effort with local, state, and federal participation can create a regional surveillance system that crosses an international border. Reducing administrative, infrastructure, and political barriers to cross-border public health collaboration will enhance the effectiveness of disease prevention projects such as BIDS.     

Insider/Outsiders,Reproductive (In)justice,and the U.S.-Mexico Border

ABSTRACT

In this article, we combine narrative and visual elements – our experiences as scholars in reproductive justice, health communication, and border studies coupled with photos from reproductive justice activist marches we attended in El Paso and Houston – to advocate for a stronger coalition between health communication scholars and Latina/o communication scholars in responding to and resisting reproductive injustices and gendered violence currently occurring at the U.S.-Mexico border.     

Qualitative Study of Latino Cancer Patient Perspectives on Care Access and Continuity in a Rural,U.S.-Mexico Border Region

Access to quality cancer care for cancer patients living in the rural U.S.-Mexico border region is complex due to common binational health care-seeking behaviors and regional socio-economic and cultural characteristics. But little is known about the challenges border dwelling residents face when navigating their cancer care systems. In-depth interviews were conducted with 22 cancer patients in Southern California. Thematic analysis was applied to identify patterns of meaning in the data. Emerging themes were: (1) delays in cancer care coordination: (a) poor coordination of cancer care (b) U.S. and cross-border discordance in cancer diagnosis; (2) regional shortage of cancer specialists; and (3) financial hardship. Findings revealed that care needs distinctly involved care coordination in/outside of the patient’s community and bi-national care coordination. In addition to local solutions to improve cancer coordination through community-based partnerships, efforts to bridge care in a two-nation context are also imperative.     

Healthcare Access and Utilization Among Women 40 and Older at the U.S.-Mexico Border: Predictors of a Routine Check-Up

Mexican Americans are more likely to experience barriers to access and utilization of healthcare services than any other U.S. Hispanic group. In Mexico, where the majority of the population has access to care, the pressing issue is the underutilization of preventive services among adults. This study was conducted to assess access and utilization barriers among a U.S.-Mexico border population. A cross-sectional, population-based survey was conducted during 1999–2000 in a pair of contiguous U.S.-Mexico border communities. Household surveys were administered to U.S. and Mexican women, 40 years of age and older, to assess healthcare access and utilization, participation in chronic disease screenings, orientation toward prevention and personal history of chronic disease. Analysis indicates few statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among access and utilization variables by country. Mexican participants were more likely to have a regular source of care and to have had a blood sugar test within the past 12 months. U.S. participants more often reported having had a Pap smear and mammogram during the previous year. Factors independently positively associated with having had a routine check-up during the past 12 months included age and having a regular provider or place to go when sick. Only going to the doctor when ill was independently inversely associated with routine check-ups in the past 12 months. Findings suggest that U.S. and Mexican border populations are similar with regard to healthcare access and utilization characteristics. Efforts to increase utilization of preventive health screenings among women are needed at the U.S.-Mexico border.     

Bullying Victimization and Substance Use Among U.S. Adolescents: Mediation by Depression

This study examined the link between bullying victimization and substance use and tested the mediating role of depression in male and female adolescents. Cross-sectional data were collected from a national sample of 1,495 tenth graders who participated in the 2005/06 Health Behaviors in School-aged Children U.S. Survey. Victimization, depression and substance use were all measured as latent variables. Substance use was measured by drinking alcohol, being drunk, smoking cigarettes and using marijuana in the past 30 days. Multiple-group structural equation modeling showed that victimization was linked to substance use in both males and females. Among females, depression was positively associated with both victimization and substance use and mediated the association between the two latter variables. Among males, depression was associated with victimization but not with substance use. Results highlight the elevated risk for victimization and substance use problems that depression poses among adolescent females.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in pregnant women from a U.S.-Mexico border population

Helicobacter pylori infection causes chronic digestive diseases that disproportionately affect Hispanics and other immigrant groups in the United States. Information on the epidemiology of H. pylori infection in pregnant women who reside along the U.S.-Mexico border is critical to understanding the dynamics of current H. pylori transmission patterns within families along the border. We describe the epidemiology of H. pylori infection in pregnant women recruited from Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics in El Paso, Texas, and Mexican Social Security Institute maternal-child clinics in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, from April 1998 to October 2000. We interviewed participants regarding environmental factors and tested their serum for IgG antibodies. We used logistic regression to estimate associations between environmental exposures and the odds of H. pylori prevalence. Definitive serological tests were available from 751 women. Seroprevalence was 74% in Juarez women and 56% in El Paso women. Prevalence increased with age, crowding, poor sanitation, and residence in Mexico, decreased with education, and was not associated with the woman's number of living children. In the U.S.-Mexico border region, women of reproductive age have a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, apparently related to poor socioeconomic conditions.     

Maternal and child mortality along the U.S.-Mexico border

This paper examines the maternal mortality and the age-specific mortality rates for the under 25 year olds in six border regions on the U.S. side of the U.S.-Mexico border and compares them with those of adjoining regions in Mexico. On the U.S. side of the border, the improvement in the general mortality status of maternal and child health from 1970 to 1980 was equal to or better than that of the nation as a whole. Despite this improvement, in 1980 five of the six border regions showed higher mortality rates due to external causes for the 1-4 age-group. On the Mexican side, maternal and child mortality was lower in the border region than in other parts of Mexico but much higher than in the United States. The 1-4 year olds in Mexico had the highest mortality rates among the three age-groups over 1 year of age.     

Assessment of respiratory symptoms and asthma prevalence in a U.S.-Mexico border region

The authors studied children who were 10-12 yr of age and who resided in sister cities in a U.S.-Mexico border region to determine the prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms. The relationship of symptoms to ambient levels of particulate matter less than 10 microm in diameter (PM10), and to several indoor environmental conditions, was assessed. The study was conducted in the border cities of Ambos Nogales (Nogales, Arizona [United States], and Nogales, Sonora [Mexico]). At the beginning of the 11-wk study, during the autumn of 1996, 631 students and their parents completed baseline questionnaires. While in school, the children completed daily symptom diaries and daily peak expiratory flow maneuvers. PM10 values and daily temperatures were also measured. The authors found that the prevalence of self-reported asthma among 5th-grade students was comparable on both sides of the border (i.e., 7.6% on the Arizona side and 6.9% on the Sonora side). Wheezing was a frequent complaint (29.5-35.6%), as was cough (16.8-29.6%). Smoking in the home was common on both sides of the border, and it was associated with a greater occurrence of self-reported asthma and respiratory complaints. Increased respiratory symptoms were also associated with increased ambient PM10 levels. The prevalence of respiratory symptoms such as wheezing and frequent cough among all children in this study, combined with the limitations inherent in self-reporting, suggest that asthma may actually be more prevalent than has been previously reported.     

The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools

Despite an abundance of evaluative evidence concerning the effectiveness of several school-based substance use prevention curricula, many of the nation's middle schools continue to implement curricula that are either untested or ineffective. This study reports the prevalence of substance use prevention curricula in the nation's public and private schools that contain middle school grades. We also report school- and respondent-related backgound characteristics differentiating schools using at least 1 effective curriculum from those using ineffective or untested curricula. Respondents comprised the lead staff who taught substance use prevention in a representative sample of 1,905 of the nation's public and private schools that include middle school grades. Data were collected in 1999 by means of a self-administered survey. Altogether, 26.8% of all schools, including 34.6% of public schools and 12.6% of private schools, used at least 1 of the 10 effective curricula specified. Few school or respondent characteristics were related to program implementation. Over two thirds of schools reported using more than 1 curriculum, and almost half reported using 3 or more. Results demonstrate the considerable gap between our understanding of effective curricula and current school practice. Prevention researchers and practitioners should work closely together to find ways to increase the proportion of schools implementing effective curricula.     

Air pollution and acute respiratory response in a panel of asthmatic children along the U.S.-Mexico border

Background: Concerns regarding the health impact of urban air pollution on asthmatic children are pronounced along the U.S.–Mexico border because of rapid population growth near busy border highways and roads.Objectives: We conducted the first binational study of the impacts of air pollution on asthmatic children in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, and El Paso, Texas, USA, and compared different exposure metrics to assess acute respiratory response.Methods: We recruited 58 asthmatic children from two schools in Ciudad Juarez and two schools in El Paso. A marker of airway inflammation [exhaled nitric oxide (eNO)], respiratory symptom surveys, and pollutant measurements (indoor and outdoor 48-hr size-fractionated particulate matter, 48-hr black carbon, and 96-hr nitrogen dioxide) were collected at each school for 16 weeks. We examined associations between the pollutants and respiratory response using generalized linear mixed models.Results: We observed small but consistent associations between eNO and numerous pollutant metrics, with estimated increases in eNO ranging from 1% to 3% per interquartile range increase in pollutant concentrations. Effect estimates from models using school-based concentrations were generally stronger than corresponding estimates based on concentrations from ambient air monitors. Both traffic-related and non–traffic-related particles were typically more robust predictors of eNO than was nitrogen dioxide, for which associations were highly sensitive to model specification. Associations differed significantly across the four school-based cohorts, consistent with heterogeneity in pollutant concentrations and cohort characteristics. Models examining respiratory symptoms were consistent with the null.Conclusions: The results indicate adverse effects of air pollution on the subclinical respiratory health of asthmatic children in this region and provide preliminary support for the use of air pollution monitors close to schools to track exposure and potential health risk in this population.     

Access to and use of ambulatory health care by a vulnerable Mexican American population on the U.S.-Mexico border.

The objective of this study was to determine if health care access is equitable and effective for Mexican Americans at the U.S.-Mexico border. The design was a cross-sectional telephone and door-to-door survey using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and the subjects were 1,409 El Paso County residents, ages 18 to 64 years. After controlling for other predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics, the presence of health insurance was significantly associated with health care use in the past year, both for a checkup (odds ratio [OR] = 2.48; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.83, 3.38) and a visit for any reason (OR = 2.20; 95 percent CI = 1.60, 3.04). Findings were similar for a regular source of care. Those who reported a checkup in the past year were significantly more likely to receive clinical preventive services. The lack of health insurance and a regular source of care for Mexican Americans on the U.S.-Mexico border creates significant inequalities in access to care.