体内电穿孔在质粒介导的基因转移及DNA免疫中的应用

目的 研究体内电穿孔技术对于质粒DNA介导的体内基因表达以及HIV-1 Env DNA疫苗免疫效果的影响.方法 将携带荧光素酶Luciferase基因的表达质粒p1.0-Luc和携带HIV-1 CN54 env基因的DNA疫苗质粒p1.0-gp1455m通过单独肌肉注射或肌肉注射后加电穿孔两种不同方法 注射小鼠.用IVIS(R)活体成像系统实时检测Luciferase报告基因在体内的表达情况.用ELISA检测HIV-1 Env特异的抗体反应,用IFN-γ ELISPOT检测HIV-1 Env特异的T细胞免疫反应.结果 体内电穿孔技术可以显著提高Luciferase在小鼠体内的表达水平,幅度达35倍.HIV-1 Env DNA疫苗免疫结果 显示,8μg质粒剂量电穿孔途径诱导的体液和细胞免疫应答强于40μg质粒剂量单纯肌肉注射组;体内电穿孔途径免疫2次与单纯肌肉注射途径免疫3次诱导的体液和细胞免疫应答水平相当.结论 体内电穿孔技术可以大幅度提高报告基因在体内的表达水平和DNA疫苗的免疫应答.     

DNA injection in combination with electroporation: a novel method for vaccination of farmed ruminants

Injection of plasmid DNA encoding antigens into rodents followed by electroporation improved the immune response when compared with injection without electroporation (Widera et al. J Immunol 2000;164:4635-40; Zucchelli et al. J Virol 2000;74:11598-607; Kadowaki et al. Vaccine 2000;18:2779-88). The present study describes the extension of this technology to farm animals, by injecting plasmid DNA encoding mycobacterial antigens (MPB70, Ag85B and Hsp65) into the muscles of goats and cattle using two different types of electrodes, both allowing DNA delivery at the site of electroporation. The animals were vaccinated under local anaesthesia without any observed immediate or long-term distress or discomfort, or any behavioural signs of muscle damage or pathological changes after the electroporation. DNA-injected and electroporated goats showed increased humoral response after the primary vaccination when compared with nonelectroporated animals. Improved T-cell responses following electroporation were observed in hsp65 DNA-vaccinated cattle. DNA injection with or without electroporation did not compromise the specificity of the tuberculin skin test. In conclusion, a protocol applying in vivo electroporation free of side effects to farmed ruminants was established. In addition, we show that DNA vaccination in combination with electroporation can improve the primary immune responses to the encoded antigens.     

电穿孔增强核酸疫苗免疫反应的研究进展

核酸疫苗自诞生以来在肿瘤、感染性疾病和自身免疫性疾病等方面显示出其独特的优越性。目前,研究如何增强核酸疫苗的免疫原性是一大热点,在众多方法中,电穿孔通过增加细胞对DNA的摄取,使表达的目的抗原增多,从而明显地增强了核酸疫苗诱导的免疫反应。就电穿孔技术在核酸疫苗研究领域的应用作一综述。     

Plasmid DNA gene therapy by electroporation: principles and recent advances

Simple plasmid DNA injection is a safe and feasible gene transfer method, but it confers low transfection efficiency and transgene expression. This non-viral gene transfer method is enhanced by physical delivery methods, such as electroporation and the use of a gene gun. In vivo electroporation has been rapidly developed over the last two decades to deliver DNA to various tissues or organs. It is generally considered that membrane permeabilization and DNA electrophoresis play important roles in electro-gene transfer. Skeletal muscle is a well characterized target tissue for electroporation, because it is accessible and allows for long-lasting gene expression ( > one year). Skin is also a target tissue because of its accessibility and immunogenicity. Numerous studies have been performed using in vivo electroporation in animal models of disease. Clinical trials of DNA vaccines and immunotherapy for cancer treatment using in vivo electroporation have been initiated in patients with melanoma and prostate cancer. Furthermore, electroporation has been applied to DNA vaccines for infectious diseases to enhance immunogenicity, and the relevant clinical trials have been initiated. The gene gun approach is also being applied for the delivery of DNA vaccines against infectious diseases to the skin. Here, we review recent advances in the mechanism of in vivo electroporation, and summarize the findings of recent preclinical and clinical studies using this technology.     

Application of in vivo electroporation to cancer gene therapy

Much intensive research has gone into the development of safe and efficient methods for the delivery of therapeutic genes. In vivo electroporation is a non-viral delivery protocol in which plasmid DNA solutions are injected into targeted tissues, followed by electric pulses (typically 100 V, 50 ms). In general, in vivo electroporation enhances gene expression in targeted tissues by 2-3 orders of magnitude, as compared to the injection of plasmid DNA solutions without electric pulses, and the tissue damage appears to be minimal. Among the other advantages of this technique are that it can safely be administered repeatedly, and it is simpler and more economical to use than viral vectors, especially in clinical cases. Using this approach, highly efficient gene transfer has already been achieved in muscle and liver as well as in tumors. In fact, gene therapies for cancer utilizing in vivo electroporation have been proved effective in a number of experimental murine tumor models. The therapeutic genes delivered in those cases were diverse including, for example, cytokine genes (IL-12) and cytotoxic genes (TRAIL), making possible a wide range of therapeutic strategies. Moreover, systemic antitumor effects were also observed, suggesting that this approach may be effective for the treatment of metastatic as well as primary tumors.     

Muscular gene transfer using nonviral vectors

Skeletal muscle is a target tissue of choice for the gene therapy of both muscle and non-muscle disorders. Investigations of gene transfer into muscle have progressed considerably from the expression of plasmid reporter genes to the production of therapeutic proteins such as trophic factors, hormones, antigens, ion channels or cytoskeletal proteins. Viral vectors are intrinsically the most efficient vehicles to deliver genes into skeletal muscles. But, because viruses are associated with a variety of problems (such as immune and inflammatory responses, toxicity, limited large scale production yields, limitations in the size of the carried therapeutic genes), nonviral vectors remain a viable alternative. In addition, as nonviral vectors allow to transfer genetic structures of various sizes (including large plasmid DNA carrying full-length coding sequences of the gene of interest), they can be used in various gene therapy approaches. However, given the lack of efficiency of nonviral vectors in experimental studies and in the clinical settings, the overall outcome clearly indicates that improved synthetic vectors and/or delivery techniques are required for successful clinical gene therapy. Today, most of the potential muscle-targeted clinical applications seem geared toward peripheral ischemia (mainly through local injections) and cancer and infectious vaccines, and one locoregional administration of naked DNA in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. This review updates the developments in clinical applications of the various plasmid-based non-viral methods under investigation for the delivery of genes to muscles.     

Applications of muscle electroporation gene therapy

Muscle is a convenient and accessible site for non-viral gene delivery, which can manufacture gene products and provide a long-duration of gene expression. The level of gene expression after administration of naked DNA plasmid or polymer-formulated DNA plasmid containing a reporter gene to muscle via syringe injection, however, is very low. As a result, no significant therapeutic effect can be detected after saline- or polymer-mediated gene delivery into muscle. In 1998, investigators published a striking new approach--electrotransfection--for intramuscular gene delivery (now commonly referred to as electroporation or electroinjection). Electroporation of a non-viral gene into the muscles of small animals has increased the level of gene expression by as much as two orders of magnitude, which is comparable to levels achieved with adenoviral gene delivery. Three years later, intramuscular electroporation gene delivery technology has blossomed. Treatments for different diseases using this approach in animal models have been reported. In this review, I discuss the applications of intramuscular electroporation gene therapy to treat malignancies, renal disease, and anemia, and to prevent drug toxicity to sensory nerves.     

Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gene expression in mouse muscle.

Plasmid pRSVL persisted and expressed luciferase for at least 19 months in mouse skeletal muscle after intramuscular injection. Other injected plasmids also stably expressed long-term suggesting that any plasmid DNA could stably persist and express in muscle. Plasmid DNA was demonstrated by quantitative PCR in some of the muscle DNA samples for at least 19 months after injection. The methylation pattern of the plasmid DNA remained in its bacterial form indicating that the foreign DNA did not replicate in the muscle cells. The electroporation of total cellular DNA from injected muscles into bacteria indicated that the plasmid DNA was extrachromosomal. Chromosomal integration of plasmid DNA was searched for by electroporating the injected muscle DNA into bacteria after restriction enzyme digestion and ligation. No plasmids containing plasmid/chromosome junctions were observed in over 1800 colonies examined. Lack of integration increases the theoretical safety of this gene transfer technique. Long-term stability of plasmid DNA in muscle indicates that muscle is an attractive target tissue for the introduction of extrachromosomal plasmid or viral DNA for the purpose of gene therapy.     

Electrotransfer into skeletal muscle for protein expression

An efficient and safe method to deliver DNA in vivo is a requirement for several purposes, such as study of gene function and gene therapy applications. Among the different non-viral delivery methods currently under investigation, in vivo DNA electrotransfer has proven to be one of the most efficient and simple. This technique is a physical method of gene delivery consisting in local application of electric pulses after DNA injection. Although this technique can be applied to almost any tissue of a living animal, including tumors, skin, liver, kidney, artery, retina, cornea or even brain, this review will focus on electrotransfer of plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle and its possible uses in gene therapy, vaccination, or functional studies. Skeletal muscle is a good target for electrotransfer of DNA as it is: a large volume easily accessible, an endocrine organ capable of expressing several local and systemic factors, and muscle fibres as post-mitotic cells have a long lifespan that allows long-term gene expression. In this review, we describe the mechanism of DNA electrotransfer, we assess toxicity and safety considerations related to this technique, and we focus on important therapeutic applications of electrotransfer demonstrated in animal models in recent years.     

In vivo gene electroporation in skeletal muscle with special reference to the duration of gene expression

To determine the limits of the duration of in vivo transferred foreign gene expression, we conducted electroporation (EP), a powerful non-viral means of gene transfer for living animals, into skeletal muscle of rats and mice with a luciferase, GFP or erythropoietin (EPO)-encoding reporter plasmid. The luciferase reporter plasmid was used for optimization of EP conditions, while GFP and EPO plasmids were used for monitoring the duration of gene expression. In the rat, increased hematocrit levels were maintained for at least 9 weeks with approximately a 3-fold increase in plasma EPO protein concentration at 4 weeks post-transfection. In the mouse, the GFP plasmid transfer confirmed that the reporter gene expression lasted as long as 3 months post-transfection. By introducing the EPO gene in vivo in the mouse, increased hematocrit levels revealed that duration of reporter gene expression was at least 14.5 months after in vivo gene EP into skeletal muscle. These results implicate an excellent potential of in vivo gene EP, applicable to both experimental and therapeutic purposes.     

In vivo electroporation of the central nervous system: a non-viral approach for targeted gene delivery

Electroporation is a widely used technique for enhancing the efficiency of DNA delivery into cells. Application of electric pulses after local injection of DNA temporarily opens cell membranes and facilitates DNA uptake. Delivery of plasmid DNA by electroporation to alter gene expression in tissue has also been explored in vivo. This approach may constitute an alternative to viral gene transfer, or to transgenic or knock-out animals. Among the most frequently electroporated target tissues are skin, muscle, eye, and tumors. Moreover, different regions in the central nervous system (CNS), including the developing neural tube and the spinal cord, as well as prenatal and postnatal brain have been successfully electroporated. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the literature describing electroporation of the CNS with a focus on the adult brain. In addition, the mechanism of electroporation, different ways of delivering the electric pulses, and the risk of damaging the target tissue are highlighted. Electroporation has been successfully used in humans to enhance gene transfer in vaccination or cancer therapy with several clinical trials currently ongoing. Improving the knowledge about in vivo electroporation will pave the way for electroporation-enhanced gene therapy to treat brain carcinomas, as well as CNS disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and depression.     

Electroporation-enhanced nonviral gene transfer for the prevention or treatment of immunological, endocrine and neoplastic diseases

Nonviral gene transfer is markedly enhanced by the application of in vivo electroporation (also denoted electro-gene transfer or electrokinetic enhancement). This approach is safe and can be used to deliver nucleic acid fragments, oligonucleotides, siRNA, and plasmids to a wide variety of tissues, such as skeletal muscle, skin and liver. In this review, we address the principles of electroporation and demonstrate its effectiveness in disease models. Electroporation has been shown to be equally applicable to small and large animals (rodents, dogs, pigs, other farm animals and primates), and this addresses one of the major problems in gene therapy, that of scalability to humans. Gene transfer can be optimized and tissue injury minimized by the selection of appropriate electrical parameters. We and others have applied this approach in preclinical autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases to deliver either cytokines, anti-inflammatory agents or immunoregulatory molecules. Electroporation is also effective for the intratumoral delivery of therapeutic vectors. It strongly boost DNA vaccination against infectious agents (e.g., hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus-1) or tumor antigens (e.g., HER-2/neu, carcinoembryonic antigen). In addition, we found that electroporation-enhanced DNA vaccination against islet-cell antigens ameliorated autoimmune diabetes. One of the most likely future applications, however, may be in intramuscular gene transfer for systemic delivery of either endocrine hormones (e.g., growth hormone releasing hormone and leptin), hematopoietic factors (e.g., erythropoietin, GM-CSF), antibodies, enzymes, or numerous other protein drugs. In vivo electroporation has been performed in humans, and it seems likely it could be applied clinically for nonviral gene therapy.     

Enhanced effect of DNA immunization plus in vivo electroporation with a combination of hepatitis B virus core-PreS1 and S-PreS1 plasmids

To develop a novel, effective HBV therapeutic vaccine, we constructed two HBV DNA immunogens that contained PreS1, HBSS1, and HBCS1. Several delivery methods, such as intramuscular (i.m.) injection, intramuscular injection plus electroporation (i.m.-EP), and intradermal injection plus electroporation (i.d.-EP) were used in a murine model to analyze and compare the immune responses that were induced by the DNA immunogens. We found that i.d.-EP accelerated specific antibody seroconversion and produced high antibody (anti-PreS1, anti-S, and anti-C antibody) titers after HBSS1 and HBCS1 immunization. Combining the HBSS1 and HBCS1 DNA immunogens with i.d.-EP produced the strongest multiantigen (PreS1, S, and C)-specific cellular immune response and the highest specific PreS1 antibody levels. The results indicated that DNA immunization using HBSS1 and HBCS1 might be an ideal candidate, with its ability to elicit robust B and T cell immune responses against multiantigen when combined with optimized delivery technology. The present study provides a basis for the design and rational application of a novel HBV DNA vaccine.     

Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success

A number of noteworthy technology advances in DNA vaccines research and development over the past few years have led to the resurgence of this field as a viable vaccine modality. Notably, these include--optimization of DNA constructs; development of new DNA manufacturing processes and formulations; augmentation of immune responses with novel encoded molecular adjuvants; and the improvement in new in vivo delivery strategies including electroporation (EP). Of these, EP mediated delivery has generated considerable enthusiasm and appears to have had a great impact in vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy by increasing antigen delivery upto a 1000 fold over naked DNA delivery alone. This increased delivery has resulted in an improved in vivo immune response magnitude as well as response rates relative to DNA delivery by direct injection alone. Indeed the immune responses and protection from pathogen challenge observed following DNA administration via EP in many cases are comparable or superior to other well studied vaccine platforms including viral vectors and live/attenuated/inactivated virus vaccines. Significantly, the early promise of EP delivery shown in numerous pre-clinical animal models of many different infectious diseases and cancer are now translating into equally enhanced immune responses in human clinical trials making the prospects for this vaccine approach to impact diverse disease targets tangible.     

Electro-Gene-Transfer: A New Approach for Muscle Gene Delivery

Gene transfer into skeletal muscle cells by direct injection of naked plasmid DNA results in sustained gene expression. Intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA might thus be used to correct myopathies, to secrete locally or systematic therapeutic proteins and to elicit an immune response against specific antigens. However, the potential utility of this technique for gene application in humans is limited by the poor transduction efficiency and the low and highly variable level of gene expression. Different methods are thus being developed to increase the efficiency of gene transfer in muscles. It has been recently reported that a dramatic improvement of DNA transfer is achieved by applying an electric field to the muscle fibers subsequent to local DNA injection. Electro-gene-transfer increases gene expression by several orders of magnitude and strongly reduces interindividual variability. Electroinjection of genes encoding for secreted proteins resulted in sustained expression and disease correction in animal models of gene therapy. Moreover, the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines is dramatically increased when antigen-encoding plasmids are delivered by this technique. This technique may thus have broad and important applications in human gene therapy. This review provides a brief overview of the theory of electro-gene-transfer and describes parameters governing its efficiency in muscle. We also summarize the results obtained with electro-gene-transfer in animal models to date and the technical issues that must be solved before its use for human therapy can be considered.     

Comparison of plasmid vaccine immunization schedules using intradermal in vivo electroporation

In vivo electroporation (EP) has proven to significantly increase plasmid transfection efficiency and to augment immune responses after immunization with plasmids. In this study, we attempted to establish an immunization protocol using intradermal (i.d.) EP. BALB/c mice were immunized with a plasmid encoding HIV-1 p37Gag, either i.d. with the Derma Vax EP device, intramuscularly (i.m.) without EP, or with combinations of both. A novel FluoroSpot assay was used to evaluate the vaccine-specific cellular immune responses. The study showed that i.d. EP immunizations induced stronger immune responses than i.m. immunizations using a larger amount of DNA and that repeated i.d. EP immunizations induced stronger immune responses than i.m. priming followed by i.d. EP boosting. Two and three i.d. EP immunizations induced immune responses of similar magnitude, and a short interval between immunizations was superior to a longer interval in terms of the magnitude of cellular immune responses. The FluoroSpot assay allowed for the quantification of vaccine-specific cells secreting either gamma interferon (IFN-γ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), or both, and the sensitivity of the assay was confirmed with IFN-γ and IL-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assays. The data obtained in this study can aid in the design of vaccine protocols using i.d. EP, and the results emphasize the advantages of the FluoroSpot assay over traditional ELISpot assay and intracellular staining for the detection and quantification of bifunctional vaccine-specific immune responses.     

Evaluation of a needle-free delivery platform for prime-boost immunization with DNA and modified vaccinia virus ankara vectors expressing herpes simplex virus 2 glycoprotein D

A previous report described a prime-boost immunization strategy using plasmid and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vectors expressing herpes simplex virus 2 glycoprotein D (gD). Enhanced humoral and cellular immune responses were elicited by the prime-boost combination compared to plasmid DNA immunization alone. Surprisingly, a more diverse antibody isotype response, and a greater antibody and cellular immune response, was obtained if the gD MVA vector was used as the priming immunization rather than the gD plasmid vector. The present report evaluates the use of a needle-free delivery platform (Biojector) for delivery of plasmid and MVA gD-expressing vectors in a prime-boost immunization strategy. Needle-free delivery of both plasmid and MVA gD expression vectors was efficient, reproducible, and elicited a strong immune response in immunized mice. Biojector delivery of plasmid DNA was able to evoke a broader isotype response and cellular immune response than that obtained by gene gun delivered plasmid DNA. Further, DNA priming by Biojector delivery as part of a prime-boost procedure with MVA-gD2 resulted in a diverse antibody isotype distribution and enhanced cellular immune responses, similar to the responses obtained when MVA-gD2 was used as the priming immunization. Thus, needle-free delivery of plasmid DNA may provide additional flexibility and options for effective prime-boost vaccination.     

Liposome/DNA complexes coated with biodegradable PLA improve immune responses to plasmid encoding hepatitis B surface antigen

We hypothesized that the addition of polymer to the surface of liposome/DNA complexes may potentially enhance in vivo delivery of plasmid DNA to antigen-presenting cells and thereby facilitate enhanced immune responses to encoded protein. BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously or intramuscularly three times with a total of 50 microg of the plasmid pRc/CMV-HBs(S) (ayw subtype) encoding for the hepatitis B surface antigen. We measured transgene-specific total immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG1 antibody responses as well as splenocyte and T-cell proliferation and cytokine production upon re-stimulation following immunization. Modification of lipid/DNA complexes by the polymer precipitation method used here for the addition of poly(d,l-lactic acid) was found to be consistently and significantly more effective than either unmodified liposomal DNA or naked DNA in eliciting transgene-specific immune responses to plasmid-encoded antigen when administered by the subcutaneous route. In addition, the polymer-modified formulations delivered by this route were more effective than naked DNA delivered by the intramuscular route in inducing antibody responses (n=5, P<0.03). Our observations provide 'proof of principle' for the use of these multicomponent formulations, which offer potential for manipulation and increased transfection efficiency in vivo for the purposes of genetic immunization.     

IL-2／IFN-γ融合蛋白基因质粒联合HBVDNA疫苗治疗HBV转基因小鼠效果评价

目的评价融合蛋白基因质粒（pFP）联合在体电脉冲（EP）介导的HBVDNA疫苗（pS2．S）免疫HBV转基因（Tg）小鼠的治疗效果。方法HBVTg小鼠随机分成3组，每组5只，分别为pS2．S＋pFP、pS2．S＋pcDNA3．1免疫治疗和pcDNA3．1对照组。联合免疫质粒总剂量40μg／只，按1：1比例混合接种。初次免疫后第4、8周分别进行第一、二次增强免疫，免疫前后分别检测血清学、组织学及HBV特异性免疫应答。结果HBVDNA血清定量检测结果，pS2．S＋pFP组免疫第8周（13317±2539）拷贝／ml、第12周（6462±3359）拷贝／ml时分别较免疫前（36159±7769）拷贝／ml明显减低，差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）；pS2．S＋pcDNA3．1组第4周（20618±9523）拷贝／ml及第8周（23818±5319）拷贝／ml时均较其免疫前水平（36090±4421）拷贝／ml明显降低（P〈0．01），但不能持续到12周（27691＋13071）拷贝／ml。并明显高于此时pS2．S＋pFP组水平，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）；观察终点（12周）pS2．S＋pFP组强小鼠个体血清HBVDNA及肝组织HBsAg表达水平降低的同时，伴随其血清ALT水平及HBsAg特异性IFN-γ分泌细胞数目的升高。结论，Th1类细胞因子IL-2／IFN-γ融合蛋白基因表达质粒能够增强HBVDNA疫苗抑制强鼠HBVDNA复制和表达的治疗作用。     

DNA vaccines: developing new strategies to enhance immune responses

We have focused our research on understanding the basic biology of and developing novel therapeutic and prophylactic DNA vaccines. We have among others three distinct primary areas of interest which include: 1. Enhancing in vivo delivery and transfection of DNA vaccine vectors 2. Improving DNA vaccine construct immunogenicity 3. Using molecular adjuvants to modulate and skew immune responses. Key to the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines is the presentation of expressed antigen to antigen-presenting cells. To improve expression and presentation of antigen, we have investigated various immunization methods with current focus on a combination of intramuscular injection and electroporation. To improve our vaccine constructs, we also employed methods such as RNA/codon optimization and antigen consensus to enhance expression and cellular/humoral cross-reactivity, respectively. Our lab also researches the potential of various molecular adjuvants to skew Th1/Th2 responses, enhance cellular/humoral responses, and improve protection in various animal models. Through improving our understanding of basic immunology as it is related to DNA vaccine technology, our goal is to develop the technology to the point of utility for human and animal health.