N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis.

The objectives of this study was to assess the overall effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in preventing radiocontrast-induced nephropathy (RCIN) using all available data in the literature. RCIN is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Existing randomized trials of NAC are small and show inconsistent results. Prior meta-analyses do not include data from the most current studies. We used standard search protocols to identify all published articles and abstracts of prospective trials using NAC with fluid hydration compared to hydration alone in patients with chronic renal insufficiency undergoing contrast procedures. A rise in serum creatinine by 0.5 mg/dl or 25% above baseline at 48-72 hr after contrast exposure was used as the primary outcome. We identified 14 trials of NAC with 1,584 patients published as full-text articles. Using a random-effects model, the use of oral NAC resulted in a significant reduction in the risk for developing RCIN (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.37-0.84; P = 0.01). This finding did not significantly change in a fixed-effect model (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.42-0.73) or when the data were reanalyzed using only randomized trials in all forms (i.e., articles and abstracts; RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47-0.95). We identified only one important difference between the positive and the negative studies: the cumulative exposure to contrast media (174 vs. 152 ml). Metaregression did not show a significant relationship between contrast volume and the RR of developing RCIN (P > 0.10). In the trials showing benefit for NAC, the treated patients' postprocedure creatinine unexpectedly decreased by 0.21 mg/dl (95% CI = 0.33-0.08). Prophylaxis with NAC significantly reduces the risk for RCIN. The reasons for improvement in serum creatinine in patients treated with NAC are unclear, but may include improved renal blood flow due to NAC and/or vigorous hydration.     

N-isobutyrylcysteine, a donor of systemic thiols, does not reduce the exacerbation rate in chronic bronchitis.

N-isobutyrylcysteine (NIC), a new thiol compound that is not rapidly hydrolysed to give higher levels of free thiols in the body than N-acetylcysteine (NAC), was used to test if the effect of NAC on exacerbations in chronic bronchitis was an effect of the unhydrolysed thiol compound. Smokers or exsmokers with chronic bronchitis forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) >40% and reversibility < or = 10% predicted were treated with oral NIC 300 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 24 weeks. Steroids, NAC, antibiotics, and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs use were restricted. Exacerbations were recorded by a respiratory symptom diary card and the time to onset of the first exacerbation after the start of treatment was measured using life-table analysis. Spirometry was performed at each visit. Six hundred and thirty-seven patients were randomized to treatment with NIC (n=316) or placebo (n=321). NIC did not prolong the time to first exacerbation (life-table analysis, p=0.59) and no increase in FEV1 or forced vital capacity was observed. Altered taste perception, taste loss and anosmia occurred more often in the NIC group (p<0.001). In conclusion, N-isobutyrylcysteine, a N-acetylcysteine-like drug with a greater bioavailability has, contrary to N-acetylcysteine, no effect on exacerbations in chronic bronchitis. This suggests that the effect of N-acetylcysteine on exacerbations in chronic bronchitis is not due to the relatively low free thiol levels (other than glutathione) produced by N-acetylcysteine therapy.     

Reduction in days of illness after long-term treatment with N-acetylcysteine controlled-release tablets in patients with chronic bronchitis

The clinical effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) controlled-release tablets, 300 mg b.i.d., and placebo, in chronic bronchitis was investigated. The study was performed as a double-blind six month comparison between active drug and placebo in two parallel groups, with statistical evaluation after four and six months. The patients were chosen from nine centres. One hundred and sixteen out-patients were included and ninety one of them completed the six month study. The acetylcysteine-treated group had a significantly reduced number of sick-leave days caused by exacerbations of chronic bronchitis after the four winter months December-March compared with the control group (NAC 173, placebo 456). The number of exacerbation days was also very much reduced, however, not significantly (NAC 204, placebo 399). At the end of the six month trial, including also two spring months, the absolute numbers of sick-leave days and exacerbation days were still fewer in the acetylcysteine-treated group, (NAC 260, placebo 739) and (NAC 378, placebo 557) respectively. This study demonstrates a significant reduction in sick-leave days after four months of NAC-treatment. A constant tendency to reduction in the number of exacerbations and exacerbation days was also registered after four and six months. The differences in these parameters were, however, not statistically significant. This was probably due to the small number of patients participating.     

Oral purified bacterial extracts in chronic bronchitis and COPD: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Oral lyophilized extracts of bacteria species have been used since the early 1970s to improve symptoms and to prevent exacerbations in COPD patients. The value of these treatments, which are thought to be immunomodulating, is poorly understood. Our aim was to quantify the efficacy of oral bacteria extracts in patients with chronic bronchitis and COPD. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized trials. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, bibliographies, and contact with authors and manufacturers. REVIEW METHODS: Randomized comparisons of oral purified bacterial (active) extracts with placebo or no treatment (control) were selected. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed and random-effects models, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR), number needed to treat for one to benefit (NNTB), or number needed to treat for one to be harmed (NNTH), with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen trials (1,971 patients), most of which were of low quality, tested OM-85BV (Broncho-Vaxom; OM Pharma; Geneva, Switzerland), LW-50020 (Luivac; ALTANA Pharma; Bad Homburg, Germany), or SL-04. Two trials (731 patients) had appropriate methodologies and reported on exacerbations. The RR in favor of the oral bacterial extract (active) was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.25), and the NNTB was 15.4 (95% CI, 5.5 to infinity; NNTH, 27.5). Five trials (591 patients) reported on observer-assessed improvement of symptoms RR in favor of active extracts was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66), and the NNTB was 4 (95% CI, 2.8 to 5.4). Two trials (n = 344), reported on patient-assessed improvement (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.61) [NNTB, 4; 95% CI, 3.0 to 5.9]. In two trials (163 patients), the average duration of an exacerbation was shorter with the active extracts (weighted mean difference, -2.7 days; 95% CI, -3.5 to -1.8). Itching or cutaneous eruptions was reported in 3.3% of patients (four trials; 802 patients) who received active extracts compared with 1.0% of control subjects (OR, 2.94 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.69) [NNTH, 50; 95% CI, 14 to 161]. Urologic problems (two trials; 671 patients) were reported in 8% of patients who received active extracts compared with 3.0% of control subjects (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.35 to 5.11) [NNTH, 22; 95% CI, 10 to 61]. CONCLUSIONS: Oral purified bacterial extracts improve symptoms in patients with chronic bronchitis and COPD. There is not enough evidence to suggest that they prevent exacerbations. Cutaneous and urologic adverse effects are common.     

Pooled clinical trial analysis of tiotropium safety

BACKGROUND: Marketing approval of pharmaceutical products is often based on data from several thousand subjects or fewer. Evaluation of safety is greatly enhanced by augmenting the safety database with postapproval studies. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of adverse event data from 19 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with tiotropium in patients with obstructive lung disease. We computed incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) for various reported adverse event end points of interest. Patients contributed person-time to the analysis as long as they were in the study until 30 days after treatment (tiotropium, placebo), or until they had the event of interest, whichever came first. Studies were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel estimator, and we used 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the precision of effect estimates. RESULTS: The pooled trial population includes 4,435 tiotropium patients and 3,384 placebo patients contributing 2,159 person-years of exposure to tiotropium and 1,662 person-years of exposure to placebo. Dyspnea, dry mouth, COPD exacerbation, and upper respiratory tract infection were the most commonly reported events. There was a higher relative risk of dry mouth in the tiotropium group (RR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.56 to 5.05). There was a lower risk of dyspnea (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81) and COPD exacerbation (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.82) in patients receiving tiotropium compared to patients receiving placebo. Other results of interest are as follows: (1) all-cause mortality (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.16); (2) cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.26); and (3) respiratory mortality (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.74). The relative risk of urinary retention was 10.93 (95% CI, 1.26 to 94.88). CONCLUSIONS: Pooling of adverse event data from preapproval and postapproval tiotropium clinical trials increase the precision of effect estimates and supports the present safety profile of tiotropium.     

Macrolides, quinolones and amoxicillin/clavulanate for chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis.

The comparative effectiveness and safety of macrolides, quinolones and amoxicillin/clavulanate (A/C) for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) was evaluated in the present study. PubMed, Current Contents and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In total, 19 RCTs (20 comparisons) were included in the present analysis. There was no difference regarding treatment success in intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable patients between macrolides and quinolones, A/C and quinolones or A/C and macrolides. The treatment success in microbiologically evaluable patients was lower for macrolides compared with quinolones (odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.69). Fewer quinolone-recipients experienced a recurrence of ABECB after resolution of the initial episode compared with macrolide-recipients during the 26-week period following therapy. Adverse effects in general were similar between macrolides and quinolones. Administration of A/C was associated with more adverse effects (mainly diarrhoea) than quinolones (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.85). Macrolides, quinolones and amoxicillin/clavulanate may be considered equivalent for the treatment of patients with an acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis in terms of short-term effectiveness. Quinolones are associated with better microbiological success and fewer recurrences of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis than macrolides, while amoxicillin/clavulanate is associated with more adverse effects than both comparators.     

Antibiotics in acute bronchitis: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Most patients with acute bronchitis who seek medical care are treated with antibiotics, although the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials to estimate the effectiveness of antibiotics in the treatment of acute bronchitis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: English-language studies published January 1966 to April 1998 were retrieved using MEDLINE, bibliographies, and consultation with experts. Only randomized trials that enrolled otherwise healthy patients with a diagnosis of acute bronchitis, used an antibiotic in the treatment group and a placebo in the control group, and provided sufficient data to calculate an effect size were included. RESULTS: We identified eight randomized controlled trials that satisfied all inclusion criteria. These studies used one of three antibiotics (erythromycin, doxycycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). The use of antibiotics decreased the duration of cough and sputum production by approximately one-half day (summary effect size 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.36). For specific symptoms, there were nonsignificant trends favoring the use of antibiotics: a decrease of 0.4 days of purulent sputum (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.8), a decrease of 0.5 days of cough (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.1), and a decrease of 0.3 days lost from work (95% CI, -0.6 to 1.1). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests a small benefit from the use of the antibiotics erythromycin, doxycycline, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of acute bronchitis in otherwise healthy patients. As this small benefit must be weighed against the risk of side effects and the societal cost of increasing antibiotic resistance, we believe that the use of antibiotics is not justified in these patients.     

N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

AIMS: Oxidative stress has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of antioxidant agent N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on postoperative AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study consisted of 115 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery. All the patients were treated with standard medical therapy and were randomized to NAC group (n = 58) or placebo (saline, n = 57). An AF episode >5 min during hospitalization was accepted as endpoint. During follow-up period, 15 patients (15/115, 13%) had AF. The rate of AF was lower in NAC group compared with placebo group (three patients in NAC group [5.2%] and 12 patients in placebo group [21.1%] had postoperative AF; odds ratio [OR] 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.77; P = 0.019). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of postoperative AF were left atrial diameter (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31; P = 0.002) and the use of NAC (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.91; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The result of this study indicates that NAC treatment decreases the incidence of postoperative AF.     

Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure: meta-analysis of randomized trials

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the evidence from rigorous clinical trials of the use of hawthorn extract to treat patients with chronic heart failure. We searched the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CISCOM, and AMED. Experts on and manufacturers of commercial preparations containing hawthorn extract were asked to contribute published and unpublished studies. There were no restrictions about the language of publication. Two reviewers independently performed the screening of studies, selection, validation, data extraction, and the assessment of methodological quality. To be included, studies were required to state that they were randomized, double-blind, and placebo controlled, and used hawthorn extract monopreparations. Thirteen trials met all inclusion criteria. In most of the studies, hawthorn was used as an adjunct to conventional treatment. Eight trials including 632 patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association classes I to III) provided data that were suitable for meta-analysis. For the physiologic outcome of maximal workload, treatment with hawthorn extract was more beneficial than placebo (weighted mean difference, 7 Watt; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3 to 11 Watt; P < 0.01; n = 310 patients). The pressure-heart rate product also showed a beneficial decrease (weighted mean difference, -20; 95% CI: -32 to -8; n = 264 patients) with hawthorn treatment. Symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue improved significantly with hawthorn treatment as compared with placebo. Reported adverse events were infrequent, mild, and transient; they included nausea, dizziness, and cardiac and gastrointestinal complaints. In conclusion, these results suggest that there is a significant benefit from hawthorn extract as an adjunctive treatment for chronic heart failure.     

N-acetylcysteine and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Oxidative stress may play a role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. There is heterogeneity in the literature with regard to the impact of antioxidant therapy on COPD exacerbation frequency. Clinical trials of N-acetylcysteine in COPD were identified in unrestricted searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and the Cochrane Register. Randomized, controlled trials which reported exacerbations over a treatment period > or =3 months were selected. Two observers independently extracted data regarding exacerbation number over the treatment period in subjects allocated to either N-acetylcysteine or placebo. Data were analyzed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis methodology. Meta-analysis of data from 8 trials (randomized n = 2,214) indicated that N-acetylcysteine significantly reduced the odds of experiencing one or more exacerbations over the treatment period (odds ratio = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [0.32-0.74], p = 0.001). Treatment effect was not reduced in studies which enrolled >50% active smokers (odds ratio = 0.36 [0.24-0.55], p < 0.001), although a greater effect was observed with exclusion of subjects using concurrent inhaled corticosteroids (odds ratio = 0.42 [0.32-0.54], p < 0.0001), suggesting that inhaled steroids attenuate the effect of N-acetylcysteine. The use of N-acetylcysteine significantly reduces the odds of exacerbation in patients with COPD, an effect possibly attenuated by inhaled steroids but not smoking. This analysis suggests treatment with N-acetylcysteine may be beneficial in a subset of patients with COPD.     

Clinical efficacy of OM-85 BV in COPD and chronic bronchitis: a systematic review

OM-85 BV is an immunomodulatory agent used for prevention of exacerbations in persons with chronic lung disease. We conducted a systematic review of OM-85 BV to evaluate its efficacy and safety. A systematic search for relevant articles was performed. Studies were included if they involved persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic bronchitis and were randomized to OM-85 BV or placebo. Investigators extracted data on study design, participant characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Thirteen trials involving 2066 individuals met inclusion criteria. Three trials enrolled an older, more homogenous population with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Utilizing quantitative pooled analysis in these studies, with one or more acute exacerbations as the endpoint, we found a non-statistically significant trend in favor of OM-85 BV [relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.05]. Ten trials enrolled a heterogeneous population with chronic bronchitis. In these trials, exacerbation rates were less with OM-85 BV in 4 of 9 trials reporting this outcome. Varied results in the outcomes of hospitalization, symptom scores, and antibiotic or steroid use were found across studies. Withdrawals and adverse events were similar between OM-85 BV and placebo. While OM-85 BV is used to prevent exacerbations in persons with chronic lung disease, consistent evidence across multiple important outcomes does not exist to clearly demonstrate clinical benefit. Further randomized controlled trials enrolling large numbers of persons with well-defined COPD are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of this agent.     

Impact of Mucolytic Agents on COPD Exacerbations: A Pair-wise and Network Meta-analysis

Mucolytics are potentially useful for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although there is conflicting advice on their use in different guideline documents. Furthermore, there is paucity of data comparing the efficacy of the different mucolytic agents in reducing the odds of COPD exacerbations. We performed pair-wise and network meta-analyses to evaluate the impact of mucoly-tics in COPD. Randomized clinical trials lasting at least 3 months and investigating the effects of mucolytics on COPD exacerbations were identified from published studies and repository databases. Mucolytics significantly reduced the odds of exacerbation vs. placebo (11 studies analyzed: odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.67; p < 0.001). The most effective drugs were carbocysteine, erdosteine, and N-acetylcysteine 1,200 mg/day (SUCRA 68.0–79.0%), whereas the OR was similar to placebo for ambroxol and N-acetylcysteine 600 mg/day. Only N-acetylcysteine 1,200 mg/day significantly protected against exacerbations vs. placebo (2 studies analyzed: OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35–0.92; p < 0.05; high quality of evidence). A signal of effectiveness was detected for carbocysteine (2 studies analyzed: OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20–1.01; p ≥ 0.05; moderate quality of evidence). Specific differences in study designs and patient-related characteristics, such as history of exacerbations and ethnicity, were potential effect modifiers for our statistical models, whereas neither respiratory function nor the use of corticosteroids influenced the analysis. This meta-analysis demonstrates that mucolytics are useful in preventing COPD exacerbations as maintenance add-on therapy to patients with frequent exacerbations. The effectiveness of mucolytics is independent of the severity of airway obstruction and the use of inhaled corticosteroids.     

The Use of Ipratropium Bromide for the Management of Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review

Ipratropium bromide is a quaternary anticholinergic bronchodilator that is commonly used to treat obstructive lung disease. Although ipratropium is not usually employed as a first-line bronchodilator to treat chronic asthma, it has been used extensively in hospital emergency departments as adjunctive therapy for the emergency treatment of acute asthma exacerbation. This review will summarize the physiological actions of ipratropium and the rationale for its use as an anticholinergic bronchodilator. Evidence available from randomized trials and from two meta-analyses is summarized to determine whether the addition of inhaled ipratropium to inhaled beta₂-agonist therapy is effective in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in children and adults. Published reports of randomized, controlled trials assessing the use of ipratropium and concurrent beta₂-agonists in adult acute asthma exacerbation were identified by a search of electronic databases, as well as by hand searching. Data from 10 studies of adult asthmatics, reporting on a total of 1377 patients, were pooled in a meta-analysis using a weighted-average method. Use of nebulized ipratropium/beta₂-agonist combination therapy was associated with a pooled 7.3% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-10.9%] and a 22.1% improvement in peak expiratory flow (95% CI, 11.0-33.2%) compared with patients who received beta₂-agonist without ipratropium. For the three trials in adults reporting hospital admission data (n = 1064), adult patients receiving ipratropium had a relative risk of hospitalization of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.06). Similarly, randomized controlled studies of pediatric asthma exacerbation and a meta-analysis of pediatric asthma patients suggest that ipratropium added to beta₂-agonists improves lung function and also decreases hospitalization rates, especially among children with severe exacerbations of asthma. The adult and pediatric studies did not report any severe adverse effects attributable to ipratropium when it was used in conjunction with beta₂-agonists. In conclusion, there is a modest statistical improvement in airflow obstruction when ipratropium is used as an adjunctive to beta₂-agonists for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation. In pediatric asthma exacerbation, use of ipratropium also appears to improve clinical outcomes; however, this has not been definitively established in adults. It would seem reasonable to recommend the use of combination ipratropium/beta₂-agonist therapy in acute asthmatic exacerbation, since the addition of ipratropium seems to provide physiological evidence of benefit without risk of adverse effects.     

Clinical outcomes in statin treatment trials: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of cardiovascular events and death in patients receiving statin treatment for cholesterol regulation. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that were published as of April 15, 1997. Primary or secondary prevention trials or regression trials were eligible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality, fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, nonfatal MI or stroke, angina, and withdrawal from the studies. Both random- and fixed-effects models were run for the outcomes of interests, and results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of the study type and duration, statin treatment type, and control arm event rates. Intent-to-treat denominators were used whenever they were available, and the number needed to treat was calculated when appropriate. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (21 303 patients) were included (2 secondary prevention studies, 5 mixed primary-secondary prevention population studies, and 10 regression trials). Treatment groups included lovastatin (t = 5), pravastatin (t = 10), and simvastatin (t = 3). For all-cause mortality, the OR was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.86) in favor of receiving statin treatment; for fatal MI, the OR was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48-0.78); for nonfatal MI, the OR was 0.69 (0.54-0.88); for fatal stroke, the OR was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-1.04); for nonfatal stroke, the OR was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54-0.88); and for angina, the OR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received statin treatment demonstrated a 20% to 30% reduction in death and major cardiovascular events compared with patients who received placebo. This advantage was generally present across study types and statin treatment types and for patients with less severe dyslipidemias. The benefit in clinical outcomes was noticeable as early as 1 year.     

Clinical Efficacy of OM-85 BV in COPD and Chronic Bronchitis: A Systematic Review

OM-85 BV is an immunomodulatory agent used for prevention of exacerbations in persons with chronic lung disease. We conducted a systematic review of OM-85 BV to evaluate its efficacy and safety. A systematic search for relevant articles was performed. Studies were included if they involved persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic bronchitis and were randomized to OM-85 BV or placebo. Investigators extracted data on study design, participant characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Thirteen trials involving 2066 individuals met inclusion criteria. Three trials enrolled an older, more homogenous population with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Utilizing quantitative pooled analysis in these studies, with one or more acute exacerbations as the endpoint, we found a non-statistically significant trend in favor of OM-85 BV [relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.65–1.05]. Ten trials enrolled a heterogeneous population with chronic bronchitis. In these trials, exacerbation rates were less with OM-85 BV in 4 of 9 trials reporting this outcome. Varied results in the outcomes of hospitalization, symptom scores, and antibiotic or steroid use were found across studies. Withdrawals and adverse events were similar between OM-85 BV and placebo. While OM-85 BV is used to prevent exacerbations in persons with chronic lung disease, consistent evidence across multiple important outcomes does not exist to clearly demonstrate clinical benefit. Further randomized controlled trials enrolling large numbers of persons with well-defined COPD are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of this agent.     

Effect of discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the COPE study

The aim of this double-blind single center study (the COPE study) was to investigate the effect of discontinuation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) on exacerbations and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After 4 months of treatment with FP (1,000 microg/day), 244 patients were randomized to either continue FP or to receive placebo for 6 months: 123 patients continued FP (FP group), and 121 received placebo (placebo group). In the FP group, 58 (47%) patients developed at least one exacerbation compared with 69 (57%) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio of a first exacerbation in the placebo group compared with the FP group was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1). In the placebo group 26 patients (21.5%) experienced rapid recurrent exacerbations and were subsequently unblinded and prescribed FP compared with 6 patients (4.9%) in the FP group (relative risk = 4.4; 95% CI 1.9-10.3). Over a 6-month period, a significant difference in favor of the FP group was observed in the total score (+2.48 95% CI 0.37-4.58), activity domain (+4.64 95% CI 1.60-7.68), and symptom domain (+4.58 95% CI 1.05-8.10) of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. This study indicates that discontinuation of FP in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with a more rapid onset and higher recurrence-risk of exacerbations and a significant deterioration in aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life.     

Treatment of chronic headache with antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although antidepressants are often used for preventing chronic headache, their effectiveness is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of English-language, randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants as prophylaxis for chronic headache. RESULTS: Thirty-eight trials were included. Because some compared more than one drug with placebo, 44 study arms were combined using a random effects model. Twenty-five studies focused on migraines, 12 on tension headaches, and 1 on both. Nineteen used tricyclic antidepressants, 18 serotonin antagonists, and 7 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Patients receiving antidepressants were twice as likely to report headache improvement (rate ratio [RR]: 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6 to 2.4). Because 31% (95% CI: 23% to 40%) more treated patients improved than those receiving placebo, clinicians would need to treat 3.2 patients for 1 patient to improve. The average amount of improvement (standardized mean difference) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.65 to 1.2), an effect considered large. Treated patients also consumed less analgesic medication (standardized mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI: -0.5 to -0.94). There were no differences in outcomes among the three classes of agents studied or by the type of headache (migraine vs. tension), quality score, length of treatment, or percentage of patients lost to follow-up. Assessment of depression across studies was insufficient to determine if the effects were independent of depression. CONCLUSION: Antidepressants are effective in preventing chronic headaches. Whether this is independent of depression and whether there are differences in efficacy by class of agent needs further study.     

Prognostic benefit of beta-blockers in patients not receiving ACE-Inhibitors.

AIMS: Beta-blockers (BBs) confer significant prognostic benefit in patients (pts) with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF). However, major trials have thus far studied BBs mainly in addition to ACE-Inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as background therapy. The magnitude of the prognostic benefit of BBs in the absence of ACE-I or ARB has not as yet been determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled BB studies in patients with CHF (n>200). Trials were identified via Medline literature searches, meeting abstracts, and contact with study organizations. Results for all-cause mortality and death or heart failure hospitalization were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel (fixed effects) method. The impact of BB therapy on all-cause mortality in CHF, in the absence (4.8%) and presence (95.2%) of ACE-I (or ARB), was determined from six trials of 13 370 patients. The risk ratio (RR) for BBs vs. placebo was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.02] in the absence of ACE-I or ARB at baseline, compared with a RR of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.83) in the presence of these agents. When ACE-Inhibitors were analysed in the same way (pre-BB), a RR of 0.89 (0.80-0.99) vs. placebo was observed in studies of >90 days. The impact of BB therapy on death or HF hospitalization in systolic CHF, in the absence and presence of ACE-I, was determined from three trials of 8988 patients. The RR for BBs vs. placebo was 0.81 (95% CI 0.61-1.08) in the absence of ACE-I or ARB at baseline, compared with a RR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.83) in the presence of these agents. When ACE-Is were analysed in the same way (pre-BB), a RR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.93) vs. placebo was observed in studies of >90 days. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of the prognostic benefit conferred by BBs in the absence of ACE-I appears to be similar to those of ACE-Is in systolic CHF. These data therefore suggest that either ACE-Is or BBs could be used as first-line neurohormonal therapy in patients with systolic CHF. Prospective studies directly comparing these agents are required to definitively address this issue.     

The effects of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials

Although inhaled corticosteroids are commonly used to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), their effect on clinical outcomes such as exacerbation and mortality is unknown. This systematic review was conducted to determine whether inhaled corticosteroids improve clinical outcomes for patients with stable COPD.All placebo-controlled randomized trials of inhaled corticosteroids given for at least 6 months for stable COPD were identified by searching MEDLINE (1966-2000), EMBASE (1980-2001), CINAHL (1982-2000), SIGLE (1980-2000), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry, and the bibliographies of published studies. We independently extracted data from each of the studies using a specified protocol, and determined the summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for exacerbations and deaths.Nine randomized trials (3976 patients with COPD), including four with a systemic steroid run-in phase, were identified. Use of inhaled corticosteroid therapy reduced the rate of exacerbations (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.84), with similar benefits in those who were and were not pretreated with systemic steroids. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy was also associated with increased rates of oropharyngeal candidiasis (RR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.1), skin bruising (RR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.8), and lower mean cortisol levels. No effects were seen on all-cause mortality (RR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.18) in the five trials that measured this outcome.This systematic review demonstrates a beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroids in reducing rates of COPD exacerbation. Further research is required to define the long-term effects of these medications and the benefit/risk ratio for patients with COPD.     

Efficacy of theophylline in people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of oral theophylline compared with placebo in people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Systematic review of randomized-controlled trials comparing oral theophylline with placebo for a minimum of 7 days in people with stable COPD. RESULTS: Twenty randomized-controlled trials were included in this review. The following outcomes showed significant improvement with theophylline compared with placebo: FEV1 and FVC both improved with theophylline (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.10 L; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.04-0.16 and WMD 0.21 L; 95% CI 0.10-0.32, respectively). VO2 max also improved with theophylline (WMD 195.27mL/ min; 95% CI 112.71-277.83), as did PaO2 and PaCO2 (WMD 3.18 mmHg; 95% CI 1.23-5.13 and WMD -2.36mmHg; 95% CI -3.52 to -1.21, respectively). Patients preferred theophylline over placebo (relative risk 2.27; 95% CI 1.26-4.11). Theophylline increased the risk of nausea compared with placebo (RR 7.67; 95% CI 1.47-39.94). CONCLUSION: This review has shown that theophylline still has a role in the management of stable COPD, and is preferred by patients over placebo. However, the benefits of theophylline in stable COPD have to be weighed against the risk of adverse effects.