Influence of amifostine on reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations after conventional- and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor

We assessed the influence of amifostine on immune reconstitution after conventional-dose paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin and high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue in patients with germ cell tumor (GCT). A total of 40 patients were treated with one cycle of paclitaxel and ifosfamide (TI) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize PBPC, three cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) and one course of high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa (CET) plus PBPC rescue. Patients were randomized to receive an absolute dose of 500 mg amifostine (group A, n=20) on each day of chemotherapy or no amifostine (group B, n=20). Prior to each cycle of chemotherapy, after hematologic engraftment from CET, 6 weeks and 3 months after transplantation the subpopulations of lymphocytes were phenotyped. Between the two study groups no statistically significant differences were observed concerning reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Throughout treatment with TIP or CET lymphocyte counts and their subpopulations remained low without severe clinical complications. Delayed reconstitution of the CD4(+) cell compartment after PBPC rescue was observed in both study groups, but did not result in any severe or atypical infections. Treatment with amifostine administered at this dose did not significantly influence the reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Low numbers of lymphocytes during chemotherapy and delayed reconstitution of CD4(+) cells and other lymphocyte subpopulations after PBPC rescue had no clinical relevance for patients with GCT.     

Prolonged CD4 depletion after sequential autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell infusions in children and young adults

Administration of mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after high-dose chemotherapy rapidly restores multilineage hematopoiesis, but the ability of such products to restore lymphocyte populations remains unclear. In this report, we evaluated immune reconstitution in a series of patients treated with sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy, followed by autologous PBPC infusions (median CD34(+) cell dose 7.2 x 10(6) cells/kg [range 2-29.3]). Although patients experienced rapid reconstitution of B cells and CD8(+) T cells, we observed CD4 depletion and diminished immune responsiveness in all patients for several months after completion of therapy. Mature CD4(+) T cells contained within the grafts did not appear to contribute substantially to immune reconstitution because CD4 counts did not differ between recipients of unmanipulated T-cell replete infusions versus CD34 selected, T-cell-depleted infusions. Rather, at 12 months after therapy, total CD4 count was inversely proportional to age (rho = -0.78, P =.04), but showed no relationship to CD34 cell dose (rho = -0.42, P =.26), suggesting that age-related changes within the host are largely responsible for the limited immune reconstitution observed. These results demonstrate that in the autologous setting, the infusion of large numbers of PBPCs is not sufficient to restore T-cell immune competence and emphasize that specific approaches to enhance immune reconstitution are necessary if immune-based therapy is to be used to eradicate minimal residual disease after autologous PBPC transplantation. (Blood. 2000;96:754-762)     

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy

Two hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), have been shown to accelerate leukocyte and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow (BM) support. Despite their use, a prolonged period of absolute leukopenia persists during which infections and other complications of transplantation occur. We collected large numbers of peripheral blood (PB) progenitors after CSF administration using either G-CSF or GM-CSF and tested their ability to affect hematopoietic reconstitution and resource utilization in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support were studied in sequential nonrandomized trials. After identical high-dose chemotherapy, patients received either BM alone, with no CSF; BM with either G-CSF or GM-CSF; or BM with G-CSF or GM-CSF and G-CSF or GM-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Hematopoietic reconstitution, as well as resource utilization, was monitored in these patients. The use of CSF- primed PBPC led to a highly significant reduction in the duration of leukopenia with a white blood cell (WBC) count under 100 and 200 cells/mL, and neutrophil count under 100 and 200 cells/mL with both GM- and G-CSF primed PB progenitor cells, compared with the use of the CSF with BM or with historical controls using BM alone. In addition, the use of CSF-primed PBPC resulted in a significant reduction in median number of antibiotics used, days in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, and hospital resources used. Patients receiving G-CSF primed PBPC also experienced a reduction in the median number of days in the hospital, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, platelet transfusions, days on antibiotics, and discounted hospital charges. Phenotypic analysis of the CSF-primed PBPC indicated the presence of cells bearing antigens associated with both early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells. The use of CSF-primed PBPC can significantly improve hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. In addition, the use of G-CSF-primed PBPC was associated with a significant reduction in hospital resource utilization, and a reduction in hospital charges.     

Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel following mobilization with epirubicin and cisplatin are feasible but ineffective in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We verified the feasibility of a multi-cycle peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC)-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The HDC regimen consisted of a single course of high-dose epirubicin given in combination with cisplatin plus filgrastim, followed by three courses of high doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel with PBPC reinfusion and filgrastim. Of the 16 enrolled patients, 13 provided an adequate number of PBPCs by a single leukapheresis, while in the three needed two procedures, with a median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 13.5 x 10(6), 10.9 x 10(6) and 0.9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. No toxic death occurred, and the collected PBPCs supported a rapid hematopoietic reconstitution after HDC; however, seven patients early interrupted the treatment early due to early progressive disease (n=4) or prolonged grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (n=3). Despite an overall response rate of 42%, the median survival for stage IV patients has been 5 months (range: 1-25+). Of two patients with stage IIIB NSCLC, one is continuously disease-free at 71+ months, while of 14 with stage IV disease, one is currently alive with disease at 25+ months. In conclusion, the combination of high-dose epirubicin with cisplatin plus filgrastim is an effective regimen in releasing large amounts of PBPCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDC. Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel are ineffective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Clinical use for expanded peripheral blood stem cells.

The increasing use of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from the peripheral blood (PBPC) to restore haematopoiesis following high-dose chemotherapy has widely propagated the development of techniques for the ex vivo manipulation of haematopoietic cells. In particular, protocols for the ex vivo expansion of PBPC have been developed for different clinical purposes. Quantitative expansion of PBPC may provide a successful strategy for tumour cell purging of autologous grafts, or may generate sufficient cell numbers for sequential transplantation protocols. Furthermore, allogeneic transplantation of megadoses of PBPC may enable us to overcome immunological barriers, and may substantially increase the number of suitable donors for an individual patient. Clinical applications also include the use of ex vivo generated, partially differentiated, post-progenitor cells, antigen presenting cells for immunotherapy of minimal residual disease, and ex vivo transduced haematopoietic cells as attractive vehicles for genetic therapy.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in patients undergoing chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (SCT) for high risk breast cancer (HRBC).

We have determined the effect of delayed addition of G-CSF after chemotherapy on PBPC mobilization in a group of 30 patients with high risk breast cancer (HRBC) undergoing standard chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous SCT. Patients received FAC chemotherapy every 21 days followed by G-CSF at doses of 5 microg/kg/day starting on day +15 (groups 1 and 2) or +8 (group 3) after chemotherapy. PBPC collections were performed daily starting after 4 doses of G-CSF and continued until more than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells had been collected. In group 1, steady-state BM progenitors were also harvested and used for SCT. Groups 2 and 3 received PBPC only. The median number of collections was three in each group. Significantly more PB CD34+ cells were collected in patients receiving G-CSF starting on day 8 vs day 15 (9.43 x 10(6)/kg and 6.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) (P < 0.05). After conditioning chemotherapy all harvested cells including BM and PBPC were reinfused. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly faster in patients transplanted with day 8 G-CSF-mobilized PBPC (P < 0.05) and was associated with lower transplant related morbidity as reflected by days of fever, antibiotics or hospitalization (P < 0.05). Both schedules of mobilization provided successful long-term engraftment with 1 year post-transplant counts above 80% of pretransplant values. In conclusion, we demonstrate that delayed addition of G-CSF results in successful mobilization and collection of PBPC with significant advantage of day 8 G-CSF vs day 15. PBPC collections can be scheduled on a fixed day instead of being guided by the PB counts which provides a practical advantage. Transplantation of such progenitors results in rapid short-term and long-term trilineage engraftment.     

Infused CD34 cell dose, but not tumour cell content of peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts, predicts clinical outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma grade 3 treated with high-dose therapy

Previously, we have shown that patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) transplanted with contaminated bone marrow (BM) generally have a poor outcome. Whether this is also the case when peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) grafts are used is not known. Forty-three patients with chemosensitive DLBCL or follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FLgr3) were treated with high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell support. Nine patients received purged grafts. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for either the BCL2/IgH translocation or allele specific oligonucleotide (ASO) QRT-PCR for the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) complementarity-determining region 3 were used. Nine of 25 (36%) PBPC grafts contained tumour cells as tested by QRT-PCR, including two grafts purged by CD34(+) cell enrichment combined with B-cell depletion. The level of contamination of the PBPC/CD34(+) cells ranged from 0 to 8.28%. No relationship could be shown between the total number of tumour cells infused and relapse. Patients receiving PCR-positive or PCR-negative PBPC grafts had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.49). However, a significant difference was seen in PFS and overall survival (OS) for the patients given >/=6.1 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg compared with those given <6.1 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (P = 0.01 and P < 0.05 respectively).     

Autologous progenitor cell transplantation: prior exposure to stem cell- toxic drugs determines yield and engraftment of peripheral blood progenitor cell but not of bone marrow grafts

Agents with stem cell-toxic potential are frequently used for salvage therapy of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Because many patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma are candidates for autologous progenitor cell transplantation, possible toxic effects of salvage chemotherapy on progenitor cells must be taken into account. In a retrospective study, we have analyzed the influence of a salvage regimen containing the stem cell-toxic drugs BCNU and melphalan (Dexa-BEAM) on subsequently harvested bone marrow (BM)- and peripheral blood-derived progenitor cell grafts (PBPC) and compared it with other factors. Progenitor cells were collected from 96 patients with HD or high-grade NHL. Seventy-nine grafts were reinfused (35 PBPC and 44 BM) after high-dose chemotherapy. Compared with patients autografted with BM, hematopoietic recovery was significantly accelerated in recipients of PBPC. For PBPC, the number of Dexa-BEAM cycles ( > or = v > 1) was the predominate prognostic factor affecting colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) yield (66 v 6.8 x 10(4)/kg, P = .0001), CD34+ cell yield (6.6 v 1.6 x 10(6)/kg, P = .0001), neutrophil recovery to > 0.5 x 10(9)/L (9 v. 11 days, P = .0086), platelet recovery to > 20 x 10(9)/L (10 v 15.5 days, P = .0002), and platelet count on day +100 after transplantation (190 v 107 x 10(9)/L, P = .031) using univariate analysis. Previous radiotherapy was associated with significantly lower CFU-GM and CD34+ cell yields but had no influence on engraftment. Patient age, patient sex, disease activity, or chemotherapy other than Dexa-BEAM did not have any prognostic impact. Multivariate analysis confirmed that Dexa-BEAM chemotherapy was the overriding factor adversely influencing CFU-GM yield (P < .0001), CD34+ cell yield (P < .0001), and platelet engraftment (P < .0001). BM grafts were not significantly affected by previous Dexa-BEAM chemotherapy or any other variable tested. However, prognostic factors favoring the use of BM instead of PBPC were not identified using joint regression models involving interaction terms between the graft type (PBPC or BM) and the explanatory variables investigated. We conclude that, in contrast to previous radiotherapy or other chemotherapy, exposure to salvage regimens containing stem cell- toxic drugs, such as BCNU and melphalan, is a critical factor adversely affecting yields and performance of PBPC grafts. Marrow progenitor cells appear to be less sensitive to stem cell-toxic chemotherapy. PBPC should be harvested before repeated courses of salvage chemotherapy involving stem cell-toxic drugs to preserve the favorable repopulation kinetics of PBPC in comparison with BM.     

Quantitative lymphocyte subset reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation from matched related donors with CD34+ selected PBPC grafts unselected PBPC grafts or BM grafts.

CD34+ cell selection of PBPC after harvest from G-CSF-treated allogeneic donors results in a more than 200-fold depletion of T lymphocytes in the graft and has been used to reduce the incidence of acute GVHD post transplant. Since transplantation with T cell-depleted BM grafts is associated with a delay in immune reconstitution and an increase of opportunistic infections, we evaluated the immunological reconstitution of patients with hematologic malignancies after therapy followed by CD34+-selected PBPC34 transplantation from matched related donors. Lymphocyte subset reconstitution over the first 12 months post transplant and the incidence of infections were evaluated in 12 patients receiving PBPC34 grafts and compared to that of patients after transplantation with PBPC without CD34+ enrichment (n = 20) or unmanipulated bone marrow grafts (BM; n = 15). PBPC34 grafts contained 264-fold fewer T lymphocytes (median 0.53 x 10(6) kg/body weight) than PBPC grafts and 36-fold fewer than BM grafts (140 x 10(6)/kg and 19 x 10(6)/kg, respectively). Despite a two log depletion of T cells in the PBPC34 grafts, T lymphocyte reconstitution appeared comparable among the three transplant groups over the first 12 months. A positive patient CMV serostatus pretransplant was correlated with a faster T cell reconstitution in all transplant groups. GVHD prophylaxis with methylprednisolone delayed B lymphocyte reconstitution. The incidence of infections post transplant did not appear to be increased in the PBPC34 group compared with the PBPC and BMT groups. It remains to be shown in larger prospective trials, whether these promising preliminary data of lymphocyte reconstitution and the clinical course after transplantation with PBPC34 can be confirmed.     

High-dose therapy in patients with Hodgkin's disease: the use of selected CD34(+) cells is as safe as unmanipulated peripheral blood progenitor cells.

Register data suggest that patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) given high-dose therapy (HDT) with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have a less favourable prognosis as compared to those given bone marrow as stem cell support. Since this can be due to infusion of tumour cells contaminating the PBPC grafts, we initiated a feasibility study in which PBPC grafts from HD patients were purged by CD34(+) cell enrichment. Controversy exists about whether the use of CD34(+) enriched stem cells leads to a delayed haematological and immune reconstitution. We compared these parameters, including risk of infections and clinical outcome after HDT, in patients with HD given either selected CD34(+) cells or unmanipulated PBPC as stem cell support. From October 1994 to May 2000, 40 HD patients with primary refractory disease or relapse were treated with HDT and supported with either selected CD34(+) cells (n = 21) or unmanipulated PBPC (n = 19) as stem cell support. All patients had chemosensitive disease at the time of transplantation. A median of 5.8 (range 2.7-20.0) vs 4.5 (range 2.3-17.6) x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kilo were reinfused in the CD34(+) group and PBPC group, respectively. No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to time to haematological engraftment, reconstitution of B cells, CD56(+) cells and T cells at 3 and 12 months and infectious episodes after HDT. Two (5%) treatment-related deaths, one in each group, were observed. The overall survival at 4 years was 86% for the CD34(+)group and 74% for the PBPC group with a median follow-up of 37 months (range 1-61) and 46 months (range 4-82), respectively (P = 0.9). The results of this study demonstrate that the use of CD34(+) cells is safe and has no adverse effects either with respect to haematological, immune reconstitution or to infections after HDT.     

Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized and harvested in 200 patients treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ( n  = 148), Hodgkin's disease ( n  = 22) and multiple myeloma ( n  = 30). The variables predicting the collection of a minimal (>2.5 × 10⁶/kg) or a high (>10 × 10⁶/kg) CD34⁺ cell count were analysed. Patients were mobilized with haemopoietic growth factors following either standard chemotherapy ( n  = 49) or high-dose cyclophosphamide, given alone ( n  = 55) or combined with high-dose VP16 ( n  = 86). 10 patients received haemopoietic growth factors only. The first mobilization resulted in a PBPC harvest with enough CD34⁺ cells in 179/200 patients (90%). High-dose cyclophosphamide, with or without VP16, did not mobilize a higher progenitor cell yield than standard chemotherapy. When performing multiple regression analysis in the 190 patients who received chemotherapy-containing mobilization, only the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and the exposure to fludarabine predicted for a failure to collect a minimal PBPC count ( P  = 0.06 and 0.0008 respectively). The target to collect a high CD34⁺ cell count was negatively associated with the number of previous chemotherapy regimens ( P  = 0.002). When only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were considered for multivariate analysis, low-grade histology with fludarabine appeared to be associated with poor PBPC cell yield ( P  = 0.08 and 0.005 respectively). This data confirms that PBPC harvest should be planned early in the disease course in transplant candidates, and can be obtained after a standard course of chemotherapy.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus recombinant rat stem cell factor contain long-term engrafting cells capable of cellular proliferation for more than two years as shown by serial transplantation in mice

Mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have been shown to provide rapid engraftment in patients given high-dose chemotherapy. PBPC contain cells with long-term engraftment potential as shown in animal models. In this study we have further analyzed mobilized PBPC for their ability to support serial transplantation of irradiated mice. Transplantation of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) plus recombinant rat stem cell factor (rrSCF) mobilized PBPC resulted in 98% donor engraftment of primary recipients at 12 to 14 months post-transplantation. Bone marrow (BM) cells from these primary recipients were harvested and transplanted into secondary recipients. At 6 months posttransplantation, all surviving secondary recipients had donor engraftment. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis showed greater than 90% male cells in spleens, thymuses, and lymph nodes. Myeloid colonies from BM cells of secondary recipients demonstrated granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming cells (GM-CFC) of male origin in all animals. In comparison, transplantation of rhG-CSF mobilized PBPC resulted in decreased male engraftment in secondary recipients. BM cells from secondary recipients, who originally received PBPC mobilized by the combination of rrSCF and rhG-CSF, were further passaged to tertiary female recipients. At 6 months posttransplantation, 90% of animals had male-derived hematopoiesis by whole-blood PCR analysis. These data showed that PBPC mobilized with rhG-CSF plus rrSCF contained cells that are transplantable and able to maintain hematopoiesis for more than 26 months, suggesting that the mobilized long-term reconstituting stem cells (LTRC) have extensive proliferative potential and resemble those that reside in the BM. In addition, the data demonstrated increased mobilization of LTRC with rhG- CSF plus rrSCF compared to rhG-CSF alone.     

Selection and expansion of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in autologous stem cell transplantation for breast cancer

Cytopenia after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell reinfusion is a major cause of morbidity. Ex vivo cultured expansion and differentiation of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) to neutrophil precursors may shorten the neutropenic period further. We explored the use of these ex vivo cultured PBPCs in nine patients with metastatic breast cancer. All underwent PBPC mobilization with cyclophosphamide, VP-16, and G-CSF. Subsequently, they underwent four to five apheresis procedures. One apheresis product from each patient was prepared using the Isolex 300 Magnetic Cell Separation System (Baxter Immunotherapy, Irvine, CA) to obtain CD34+ cells. These cells were then cultured in gas permeable bags containing serum-free X-VIVO 10 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) medium supplemented with 1% human serum albumin and 100 ng/mL PIXY321. At day 12 of culture the mean fold expansion was 26x with a range of 6 to 64x. One patient's cells did not expand because of a technical difficulty. The final cell product contained an average of 29.3% CD15+ neutrophil precursors with a range of 18.5% to 48.1%. The patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and thiotepa. On day 0, the cryopreserved PBPCs were reinfused and on day +1 the 12-day cultured cells were washed, resuspended, and reinfused into eight of nine patients. One patient was not infused with cultured cells. The mean number of cultured cells reinfused was 44.6 x 10(6) cells/kg with a range of 0.8 to 156.6 x 10(6) cells/kg. No toxicity was observed after reinfusion. The eight patients have recovered absolute neutrophil counts > 500/microL on a median of 8 days (range 8 to 10 days); the median platelet transfusion independence occurred on day 10 (range 8 to 12 days) and platelet counts > 50,000/microL were achieved by day 12 (range 9 to 14) for the seven patients whose platelet counts could be determined. Expanded CD34+ selected PBPC can be obtained and safely reinfused into patients.     

Keratinocyte growth factor augments immune reconstitution after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in rhesus macaques

Opportunistic infections contribute to morbidity and mortality after peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation and are related to a deficient T-cell compartment. Accelerated T-cell reconstitution may therefore be clinically beneficent. Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) has been shown to protect thymic epithelial cells in mice. Here, we evaluated immune reconstitution after autologous CD34(+) PBPC transplantation in rhesus macaques conditioned with myeloablative total body irradiation in the absence or presence of single pretotal body irradiation or repeated peritransplant KGF administration. All KGF-treated animals exhibited a well-preserved thymic architecture 12 months after graft. In contrast, thymic atrophy was observed in the majority of animals in the control group. The KGF-treated animals showed higher frequencies of naive T cells in lymph nodes after transplantation compared with the control animals. The animals given repeated doses of KGF showed the highest levels of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and the lowest frequencies of Ki67(+) T cells, which suggest increased thymic-dependent reconstitution in these animals. Of note, the humoral response to a T-cell-dependent neo-antigen was significantly higher in the KGF-treated animals compared with the control animals. Thus, our findings suggest that KGF may be a useful adjuvant therapy to augment T-cell reconstitution after human PBPC transplantation.     

An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy

The CD34 antigen is expressed by committed and uncommitted hematopoietic progenitor cells and is increasingly used to assess stem cell content of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections. Quantitative CD34 expression in PBPC collections has been suggested to correlate with engraftment kinetics of PBPCs infused after myeloablative therapy. We analyzed the engraftment kinetics as a function of CD34 content in 692 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients had PBPCs collected after cyclophosphamide based mobilization chemotherapy with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) until > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were harvested. Measurement of the CD34 content of PBPC collections was performed daily by a central reference laboratory using a single technique of CD34 analysis. Forty-five patients required a second mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and 15 patients with less than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg available for infusion received HDC. A median of 9.94 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.5 to 112.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) contained in the PBPC collections was subsequently infused into patients after the administration of HDC. Engraftment was rapid with patients requiring a median of 9 days (range, 5 to 38 days) to achieve a neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L and a median of 9 days (range, 4 to 53+ days) to achieve a platelet count of > or = 20 x 10(9)/L. A clear dose-response relationship was evident between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused between the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram infused and neutrophil and platelet engraftment kinetics. Factors potentially influencing the engraftment kinetics of neutrophil and platelet recovery were examined using a Cox regression model. The single most powerful mediator of both platelet (P = .0001) and neutrophil (P = .0001) recovery was the CD34 content of the PBPC product. Administration of a post-PBPC infusion myeloid growth factor was also highly correlated with neutrophil recovery (P = .0001). Patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin had more rapid platelet recovery than patients receiving other regimens (P = .006), and patients requiring 2 mobilization procedures versus 1 mobilization procedure to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg experienced slower platelet recovery (P = .005). Although a minimal threshold CD34 dose could not be defined, > or = 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg appears to be optimal for ensuring rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery.     

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.     

Definition of a critical T cell threshold for prevention of GVHD after HLA non-identical PBPC transplantation in children.

The aim of this study was to reduce the rate of graft failure after HLA non-identical stem cell transplantation by using G-CSF mobilized CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC), either in combination with bone marrow or as single grafts. To prevent GVHD, PBPC were highly purified, resulting in a 5 to 6 log T cell depletion. In additon to T cell depletion no further GVHD prophylaxis was used. We transplanted 23 pediatric patients with life-threatening malignant or non-malignant hematological disorders, who had no available matched donor. Engraftment was obtained in 18 of 21 evaluable patients. Five patients developed acute GVHD of grade II and III, which became chronic in four cases and was fatal in four. The use of highly purified PBPC allowed the exact quantification of residual T cells in the grafts and a strict correlation between the residual T cell load and the development of GVHD was observed: patients with GVHD had received numbers of T cells between 8 and 20 x 104/kg, whereas patients without GVHD were grafted with T cell numbers ranging from 0.7 to 6.0 x 104/kg. We therefore clearly demonstrate that a residual T cell content of <5 x 104/kg is safe for prevention of GVHD after HLA non-identical PBPC transplantation in children.     

Guidelines for efficient peripheral blood progenitor cell collection

In recent years peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have increasingly been used to support hematological recovery after high-dose chemotherapy treatment. PBPC are collected by leukopheresis after mobilization by chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic growth factors. Efficient mobilization and correct timing of leukopheresis is essential to minimize the number of leukophereses required for collection of sufficient PBPC for transplantation. Mobilization efficiency is influenced by various factors and recruitment of cells can be assessed by cell assays and FACS analysis. Target values of cells required for rapid hematological reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy have been reported, but threshold values for various conditions still need to be established. CD34 + selection of the leukopheresis is of value for tumor cell purging and may be important for reduction of relapse rate of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.     

Randomized trial of peripheral blood progenitor cell vs bone marrow as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease: a clinical and molecular analysis.

Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and unstimulated bone marrow (BM) were evaluated and compared for reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with respect to engraftment, overall and relapse-free survival, and contamination by lymphoma cells using molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Forty-four patients with either NHL or HD underwent autologous transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either Filgrastim-mobilized PBPC (n = 15) or unstimulated BM (n = 14). An additional 15 patients received PBPC without randomization because of a recent history of marrow involvement by lymphoma. Use of PBPC was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment than BM (11 vs 14 days to an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l, P = 0.04), but without any difference in platelet engraftment, infectious complications, or overall or event-free survival. Both BM (65%) and PBPC (73%) were frequently contaminated by tumor cells as assessed by CDR3 analysis. Patients with negative polymerase chain reaction analysis of a BM sample during the study had a trend towards an improved survival; however, BM involvement by disease had no impact on the ability to mobilize or collect PBPC. We conclude that PBPC are as effective as BM in reconstituting hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy and that both products are frequently contaminated by sequences marking the malignant clone.     

Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Collection during Hematopoietic Recovery following Autologous Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation

Background and objectives: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are increasingly used for autologous transplantation after high-dose radio/chemotherapy in patients suffering from cancer. PBPC are usually collected after mobilization with conventional-dose chemotherapy plus growth factor. However, it is conceivable to perform leukapheresis for the second autograft during recovery of hematopoiesis after the first course of HDCT/ABPCT. Materials and methods: We treated two patients this way. In the first, with germ cell cancer, six 12-liter leukaphereses yielded 1.8×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg after mobilization with cis-platinum, etoposide and ifosfamide (PEI) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The second patient, with relapsed Hodgkin's disease, underwent PBPC collection after treatment with dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (DexaBEAM) plus G-CSF. Due to excellent mobilization, 8.5×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg were collected by one 12-liter leukapheresis. Both patients then underwent PBPC collection during hematopoietic recovery following HDCT and ABPCT. Results: In patient 1, following HDCT and ABPCT, three 12-liter aphereses resulted in 0.7×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg. In patient 2, also after HDCT and ABPCT, a second autograft with 3.2×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg was harvested by a single 10-liter apheresis. No adverse effects were seen in either patient during apheresis following ABPCT. To our knowledge this is the first report dealing with PBCT collection during hematopoietic recovery following HDCT and ABPCT. Conclusions: (1) PBPC harvesting is feasible and well tolerated in this setting. (2) In appropriate patients with efficient PBPC mobilization after conventional-dose chemotherapy, a further PBPC autograft can be collected during recovery of hematopoiesis after ABPCT, serving as a rescue for a second course of HDCT.