Randomized comparison of long-term losartan versus propranolol in lowering portal pressure in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been suggested that losartan, an angiotensin II (A-II) type 1 receptor blocker, may have a pronounced portal pressure reducing effect, far greater than that of propranolol. This randomized controlled trial compared the hemodynamic and renal effects of continued 6-week administration of losartan (n = 25) vs. propranolol (n = 15) in portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis treated endoscopically after a variceal bleeding episode. METHODS: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), systemic hemodynamics, renal function, and vasoactive factors were measured before and at 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Losartan did not reduce HVPG (-2% +/- 12%, NS) but significantly decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP, -8% +/- 10%, P = 0.001). On the contrary, propranolol significantly reduced HVPG (-10% +/- 11%, P = 0.003) and cardiac output (-16% +/- 12%, P = 0.001) but did not modify MAP (2.5% +/- 10%, NS). Losartan increased A-II levels, reduced aldosterone, and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Child B patients. Propranolol did not modify renal function. Adverse events related to therapy were mild and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike propranolol, long-term losartan administration does not significantly reduce HVPG in patients with cirrhosis treated after a variceal bleeding episode, and it caused hypotension and reduced GFR in patients with moderate liver failure. Therefore, losartan is not an alternative to propranolol in preventing variceal rebleeding.     

Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure adequately reflect the hemodynamic effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. However, the prognostic value of variceal pressure responses during continued propranolol therapy has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether this may substitute invasive measurements of portal pressure response. Fifty-five portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis were studied before and at 4 months of continued propranolol therapy. Variceal pressure was measured using an endoscopic pressure gauge. Portal pressure was evaluated as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Over a 28 +/- 11 month follow-up, 16 patients experienced variceal bleeding. Baseline characteristics were similar in bleeders and nonbleeders. At 4 months, reduction in variceal pressure was less marked in bleeders than in nonbleeders (5% +/- 20% vs. -15% +/- 24%; P =.03). A fall in variceal pressure 20% or greater of baseline was an independent predictor of absence of variceal bleeding; which occurred in 5% of patients with a 20% or greater fall in variceal pressure versus 42% of patients with less than a 20% reduction (P =.004). The HVPG response had similar independent prognostic value (decrease > or =20%: 6% bleeding; decrease <20%: 45% bleeding; P =.004) but identified different patients. Achieving a 20% decrease in either variceal pressure or HVPG was highly sensitive (85%) and specific (93%) identifying patients not bleeding on follow-up. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure response to continued pharmacotherapy provide useful prognostic information on the risk of variceal bleeding. As with HVPG response, a fall in variceal pressure of 20% or greater is associated with a very low risk of variceal bleeding. The combination of both parameters allows almost optimal prognostication.     

Low doses of isosorbide mononitrate attenuate the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis

Postprandial hyperemia is associated with a significant increase in portal pressure in cirrhosis, which may contribute to progressive dilation and rupture of gastroesophageal varices. In cirrhosis, an insufficient hepatic production of nitric oxide (NO) may impair the expected hepatic vasodilatory response to increased blood flow, further exaggerating the postprandial increase in portal pressure. This study was aimed at investigating whether low doses of an oral NO donor might counteract the postprandial peak in portal pressure. Twenty-three portal hypertensive cirrhotics, 8 of them under propranolol therapy, were randomized to receive orally 5-isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN; 10 mg; n = 11) or placebo (n = 12) and a standard liquid meal 15 minutes later. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and hepatic blood flow (HBF) were measured at baseline and 15, 30, and 45 minutes after a meal. ISMN significantly attenuated the postprandial increase in portal pressure as compared with placebo (peak HVPG increase: 2.4 +/- 1.4 mm Hg vs. 5.2 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P =.002). Percentual increases in HBF were similar in both groups. MAP decreased slightly in ISMN group (-7.5% +/-.5%; P <.01 vs. baseline). These effects were also observed in patients on chronic propranolol therapy. In conclusion, hepatic NO supplementation by low doses of ISMN effectively reduces the postprandial increase of portal pressure in cirrhosis, with only a mild effect on arterial pressure. The same was observed in patients receiving propranolol. Our results suggest that therapeutic strategies based on selective hepatic NO delivery may improve the treatment of portal hypertension.     

Carvedilol, a new nonselective beta-blocker with intrinsic anti- Alpha1-adrenergic activity, has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

Only some patients show a substantial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction after propranolol, which makes it desirable to investigate drugs with greater portal hypotensive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with anti-alpha1-adrenergic activity, may cause a greater HVPG reduction than propranolol. Thirty-five cirrhotic patients had hemodynamic measurements before and after the random administration of carvedilol (n = 14), propranolol (n = 14), or placebo (n = 7). Carvedilol markedly reduced HVPG, from 19.5 +/- 1.3 to 15.4 +/- 1 mm Hg (P <.0001). This HVPG reduction was greater than after propranolol (-20.4 +/- 2 vs. -12.7 +/- 2%, P <.05). Moreover, carvedilol decreased HVPG greater than 20% of baseline values or to 相似文献   

Effect of Beta-adrenergic Blockade on Elevated Arterial Compliance and Low Systemic Vascular Resistance in Cirrhosis

Background: Patients with cirrhosis exhibit a characteristic hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output and heart rate and reduced systemic vascular resistance. The compliance of the arterial tree has recently been reported to be increased in these patients, who are often treated with beta-blockers, but the effect of this treatment on arterial compliance has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the effects of propranolol on the arterial compliance of patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Twenty patients with cirrhosis underwent a haemodynamic investigation with determination of splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics. Arterial compliance was determined as the ratio of the stroke volume to the pulse pressure and compared to normal values. Results: All the patients had significant portal hypertension, with a mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 17.8 mmHg, and responded to beta-blocker treatment with a significant reduction in the HVPG (-16%; P &lt; 0.001). Arterial compliance was elevated (1.27 versus controls 1.01 ml/mmHg; P     

Effects of propranolol on venous compliance in conscious rats with pre-hepatic portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The venous system is the primary capacitance region in the body. However, the influence of active changes in the venous system on the hemodynamic alterations of portal hypertension is poorly understood. To investigate venous compliance (VC) in conscious partial portal vein ligated rats (PPVL) and the effect of propranolol on VC. METHODS: Venous compliance was derived from the relationship between changes in mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP) and changes in blood volume (BV). Measurements were performed before and after i.v. propranolol (7.5 mg/Kg) or placebo in rats with portal hypertension due to PPVL and sham operated controls. RESULTS: PPVL rats had an increased VC when compared to Sham (4.9+/-1.4 vs. 3.7+/-0.9 ml kg-1 mm Hg-1; P<0.02). VC did not change after placebo but was significantly reduced by Propranolol in PPVL (-32.9+/-15.7%; P<0,007). Propranolol did not modify venous compliance in sham operated rats (+10.9+/-13.4%; P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Venous compliance is increased in portal hypertensive rats, suggesting that the venous system contributes to the profound circulatory changes encountered in portal hypertension. The increased venous compliance is markedly attenuated by propranolol, suggesting that this abnormality is related to increased adrenergic activity.     

Damping index of Doppler hepatic vein waveform to assess the severity of portal hypertension and response to propranolol in liver cirrhosis: a prospective nonrandomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Alterations in the Doppler hepatic vein (HV) waveform are associated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. We prospectively evaluated the correlation between the extent of abnormal Doppler HV waveforms expressed as damping index (DI) and the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 76 patients with cirrhosis (69 men and seven women), both DI of Doppler HV waveform and HVPG were measured, and the relationship between them was analysed. DI was calculated by the minimum velocity/maximum velocity of the HV waveform. An HVPG>12 mmHg was defined as severe portal hypertension. In a subgroup of 19 patients receiving propranolol, changes in both DI and HVPG were evaluated after propranolol administration for 3 months. One author (S. K. B.) performed all DI of Doppler HV waveform studies. RESULTS: Abnormal HV waveforms were seen in 66 of 76 patients (86.8%). DI significantly correlated with the grade of HVPG, i.e. with higher HVPG increased DI was observed (P<0.01). By logistic regression analysis, DI>0.6 was significantly more likely to be severe portal hypertension (odds ratio: 14.19, 95% confidence interval: 4.07-49.55). Receiver-operating characteristic curve according to the value of 0.6 of DI showed a sensitivity of 75.9% and a specificity of 81.8% for the presence of severe portal hypertension. In 19 patients of the propranolol subgroup, change of DI following propranolol treatment also significantly correlated with that of HVPG (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Damping index of the HV waveform by Doppler ultrasonography might be a non-invasive supplementary tool in evaluating the severity of portal hypertension and in responding to propranolol in patients with liver cirrhosis.     

Acute administration of carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of portal pressure in patients with viral cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: Propranolol is known to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension; however, a substantial number of patients do not respond to propranolol administration. The addition of isosorbide-5-mononitrate may enhance portal pressure reduction in patients receiving propranolol. Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-blocker with alpha(1)-adrenergic blocking activity. It has been shown to decrease portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. Additionally, carvedilol has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol alone in patients with cirrhosis. The current study is aimed at comparing the acute hemodynamic effects of carvedilol with the effects of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in patients with viral cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with viral cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive an oral administration of carvedilol of 25 mg (n = 11) or an oral administration of propranolol 40 mg plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate 20 mg (n = 11). Hemodynamic values were measured at basal and 90 min after drugs administration. RESULTS: Both carvedilol and propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate significantly decreased cardiac index, heart rate, and HVPG. The magnitude of changes in HVPG observed between the basal and after drugs administration was greater in patients receiving carvedilol than in those receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (-18.6 +/- 3.6%vs-10.1 +/- 3.6%, p < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow increased following carvedilol administration but remained unchanged in patients receiving propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The magnitude of decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not differ between the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In our patients with viral cirrhosis, carvedilol is more effective than propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the reduction of HVPG. Carvedilol administration causes an increase in hepatic blood flow, but its systemic effects were similar to those of propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate.     

Propranolol decreases portal pressure without changing portocollateral resistance in cirrhotic rats

Propranolol decreases portal pressure by reducing portal blood inflow. Studies in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension due to portal vein stenosis (a model with extensive portosystemic shunting) have shown that propranolol increases the portocollateral resistance, which hinders the fall in portal pressure. The present study examined the effects of propranolol on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in rats with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis of the liver, a model which is characterized by mild portosystemic shunting. Two groups of rats with CCl4-induced cirrhosis were studied: the propranolol group (n = 8), which received a propranolol infusion of 2 mg per 15 min, and controls (n = 9), which received a placebo (saline) infusion. Hemodynamic measurements were done using radiolabeled microspheres. Propranolol-treated rats had significantly lower cardiac output (-31%) and heart rate (-26%) than controls (p less than 0.001). Hepatic artery flow was not modified by propranolol. Propranolol caused splanchnic vasoconstriction, manifested by increased splanchnic resistance (+57%) and by a significant fall in portal blood inflow (4.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.5 ml per min.100 gm in controls, p less than 0.05). In contrast with rats with prehepatic portal hypertension, propranolol did not increase portal resistance in cirrhotic rats [2.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.1 mmHg per ml per min.100 gm body weight (not significant)]. Hence, the fall in portal pressure (-19%) was expected from the decrease in portal inflow (-24%). These results suggest that increased portal resistance in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension may represent an intrinsic effect of propranolol on the portocollateral vessels, since beta-blockade does not modify portal vascular resistance in cirrhosis.     

Octreotide enhances portal pressure reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In vitro, octreotide potentiates vasoconstriction in isolated, preconstricted, mesenteric arterial vessels. In cirrhotic patients, portal pressure (HVPG) reduction induced by propranolol is partly due to splanchnic vasoconstriction. AIM: To evaluate HVPG effects of octreotide administration in cirrhotic patients receiving long-term propranolol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial. First study: a total of 28 patients were studied at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide (200 mug) (N = 14) or placebo (N = 14) and then treated with propranolol for approximately 30 days (106 +/- 5 mg/day). Second study: after baseline evaluation patients received octreotide or placebo as they were assigned to in the first study and measurements repeated 30 and 60 minutes later. RESULTS: In the first study baseline HVPG was 18.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg and decreased to 17.1 +/- 1.1 mmHg and 17.1 +/- 1.0 mmHg (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Eight patients decreased their HVPG after octreotide. In the second study baseline HVPG was 15.6 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.01 vs baseline HVPG in first study) and decreased to 14.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg and 14.1 +/- 1.3 mmHg (25.7 +/- 5% lower than baseline HVPG in the first study, P < 0.01) (both P < 0.05 vs baseline) at 30 and 60 minutes after octreotide, respectively. Nine patients (2 responders/7 nonresponders to propranolol) decreased their HVPG after octreotide. Octreotide effects may be mediated by potentiation and additive mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide enhances HVPG reduction induced by propranolol in cirrhotic patients.     

Influence of beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism on the hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

The beta-2-adrenergic receptor (beta(2-)-AR) has several single-nucleotide polymorphisms. These influence the functional response to adrenergic stimulation; genotypes homozygous for Gly16-Glu27 or Gly16-Gln27 alleles (Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes) are associated with enhanced response, whereas genotypes homozygous for Arg16-Gln27 alleles (Arg16-Gln27) show a decreased response. We hypothesized that gene polymorphisms at the beta2-AR may influence the hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. The beta2-AR gene polymorphisms were determined by direct sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in 48 patients with cirrhosis. All patients also had hepatic and systemic hemodynamic studies before and after propranolol administration. Prevalence of Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes was 29.1%, Arg16-Gln27 haplotype was 16.7%, and 54.2% were compound heterozygotes. Patients with cirrhosis with Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes had a greater decrease in heart rate, cardiac index, and hepatic blood flow after propranolol administration than those with Arg16-Gln27 haplotype. However, the HVPG response to propranolol was similar in both groups, whereas estimated hepatic sinusoidal resistance increased significantly in Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes but not in Arg16-Gln27 (+27.1 +/- 17.8% vs -17.9 +/- 13.9%, P = .042), suggesting that unopposed vasoconstrictive activity at the intrahepatic circulation hinders the fall in HVPG despite enhanced hemodynamic response to propranolol in Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes. In conclusion, beta2-AR gene polymorphisms influence the response to beta-blockade. However, HVPG reduction cannot be predicted from polymorphism analysis. Patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes may benefit from the association of hepatic vasodilators to propranolol therapy.     

Endothelin-1 contributes to maintenance of systemic but not portal haemodynamics in patients with early cirrhosis: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increased endothelin (ET)-1 activity may contribute to the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess the systemic and portal haemodynamic effects of selective ET-A and ET-B receptor antagonism in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Sixteen patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (aged 52 (1) years, Pugh score 6.2 (0.3)) underwent 24 studies with infusions of: (A) selective ET-A antagonist, BQ-123 (n = 8), at 1000 and 3000 nmol/min; (B) selective ET-B antagonist, BQ-788 (n = 8), at 100 and 300 nmol/min; or (C) matched saline placebo (n = 8) in a double blind randomised manner. Haemodynamic measurements were performed through pulmonary artery, hepatic venous, and femoral artery catheters. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were well matched. Compared with placebo, BQ-123 decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP -15 (11) mm Hg (-18%); p<0.02) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI -81 (54) dyn x s x m2/cm5 (-64%); p<0.05), with no effect on hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), cardiac index (CI), or systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI). Compared with placebo, BQ-788 increased MAP (+11 (3) mm Hg (+12%); p<0.03) and SVRI (+1101 (709) dyn x s x m2/cm5 (+50%); p<0.05), reduced CI (-1.0 (0.4) l/min/m2 (-29%); p = 0.05) with no effect on HVPG or PVRI. CONCLUSIONS: ET-1 contributes to maintenance of systemic and pulmonary haemodynamics without acutely affecting HVPG in patients with early cirrhosis. In this group of patients, the use of selective ET-A and ET-B antagonists for the management of variceal haemorrhage is likely to be limited.     

Effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on elevated arterial compliance and low systemic vascular resistance in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis exhibit a characteristic hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output and heart rate and reduced systemic vascular resistance. The compliance of the arterial tree has recently been reported to be increased in these patients, who are often treated with beta-blockers, but the effect of this treatment on arterial compliance has not been investigated. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the effects of propranolol on the arterial compliance of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Twenty patients with cirrhosis underwent a haemodynamic investigation with determination of splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics. Arterial compliance was determined as the ratio of the stroke volume to the pulse pressure and compared to normal values. RESULTS: All the patients had significant portal hypertension, with a mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 17.8 mmHg, and responded to beta-blocker treatment with a significant reduction in the HVPG (-16%; P < 0.001). Arterial compliance was elevated (1.27 versus controls 1.01 ml/mmHg; P < 0.001), but remained almost unchanged during beta-adrenergic blockade (1.27 versus 1.29 ml/mmHg, +2%, ns), whereas systemic vascular resistance increased substantially (1083 versus 1378 dyn x s x cm-5, +27%; P < 0.001). The mean arterial blood pressure (-6%; P < 0.05), heart rate (-20%; P < 0.001), cardiac output (-25%; P < 0.001) and hepatic blood flow (-22%; P < 0.001) fell significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with beta-blockers increases small vessel (arteriolar) vascular tone towards the normal level, but does not affect the elevated compliance of the larger arteries in patients with cirrhosis.     

Randomized comparison of long-term carvedilol and propranolol administration in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis

Short-term carvedilol administration is more powerful than propranolol in decreasing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in cirrhotic patients, but induces arterial hypotension that may prevent its long-term use in portal hypertensive patients. This study compared the HVPG reduction and safety of long-term carvedilol and propranolol. Fifty-one cirrhotic patients were randomly assigned to receive carvedilol (n = 26) and propranolol (n = 25). Hemodynamic measurements and renal function were assessed at baseline and after 11.1 +/- 4.1 weeks. Carvedilol caused a greater decrease in HVPG than popranolol (-19 +/- 2% vs. -12 +/- 2%; P <.001). The proportion of patients achieving an HVPG reduction >/=20% or 相似文献   

Perendoscopic variceal pressure measurement: A reliable estimation of portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis?

OBJECTIVES: In patients with cirrhosis, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the reference method for the assessment of portal hypertension (PHT). Variceal pressure (VP) may be measured at endoscopy, but its relationship to the HVPG remains controversial. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare HVPG and VP values obtained in a cohort of patients with cirrhosis and PHT. METHODS: Within 8 days (range: 6-10 days), 64 patients in a stable condition with biopsy-proven cirrhosis [alcoholic: 47; other 17; mean age: 56.5 yrs (35-70); mean Child-Pugh's score: 9.4 +/- 1.9; ascites: 37/64; previous variceal bleeding (="bleeders"): 24/64) and oesophageal varices (grade 2: 49; grade 3: 15)] underwent both measurement of the HVPG during transjugular liver biopsy and VP at endoscopy using a "home made" pressure sensitive gauge in the absence of needle puncture of the varix. Alcoholic hepatitis was present in 28 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. RESULTS: The pressure sensitive gauge was well tolerated. The mean HVPG and VP values were 18.5 +/- 3.4 mmHg and 19 +/- 3.7 mmHg, respectively. A significant difference was observed between "bleeders" (n=24) and non "bleeders" (n=40) in terms of VP values (21.4 +/- 3.3 vs 17.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg, P<0.001), but not for HVPG values (19.4 +/- 4.1 vs 17.9 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P=0.075). A positive correlation was observed between VP and HVPG values (r=0.62, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices, a "home-made" pressure sensitive gauge allowed a non invasive perendoscopic measurement of VP. The positive correlation between VP and HVPG values suggests that measurement of VP may be a reliable estimate of portal pressure in these patients.     

Early primary prophylaxis with beta-blockers does not prevent the growth of small esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The efficacy of portal pressure reduction by beta-blockers and the utility of serial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements for the management of small (≤5 mm) esophageal varices in patients of cirrhosis are not clear.

Aims

The study had the following aims: to study (1) the effect of propranolol on the growth of small varices and (2) whether single or serial HVPG measurements result in a better outcome compared to no measurement in patients with small varices.

Methods

Consecutive cirrhosis patients with small varices, without any history of variceal bleed, were randomized to receive propranolol or placebo and to undergo no HVPG, only baseline HVPG, or serial HVPG measurements.

Results

A total of 150 cirrhotics (cirrhosis predominantly viral or alcohol induced) were included (77 in the beta-blocker and 73 in the placebo group). Baseline characteristics were similar. The actuarial 2-year risk of growth of varices (primary endpoint) was 11 and 16% in the propranolol and placebo group, respectively (P = 0.786). Variceal bleeding and mortality were also comparable in the two groups. Similarly, the outcome was not influenced by HVPG measurements (whether serial, only baseline, or no HVPG). A bilirubin level of ≥1.5 mg/dl was found to be an independent predictor of variceal progression.

Conclusions

In cirrhotics with small esophageal varices, nonselective beta-blockers are unable to prevent the growth of varices, variceal bleed, or mortality. HVPG monitoring of these patients did not change the outcome; however, the role of HVPG-guided therapy modification needs to be studied.     

Comparison of portal vein velocity and the hepatic venous pressure gradient in assessing the acute portal hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare noninvasive Doppler sonography and invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to determine the acute portal hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In a blinded study design, portal vein velocity (PVV) and HVPG were simultaneously assessed in 11 cirrhotic patients for 4 h after oral ingestion of 40 mg propranolol. RESULTS: Both HVPG (17.2% +/- 4.3%, p < 0.0001) and PVV (15.6% +/- 2.1%, p < 0.0002) showed a highly significant reduction during the study period versus baseline. Based on HVPG measurements, four patients (36%) were classified as nonresponders. These patients had a significantly lower PVV reduction compared to the responders (responders: 18.8% +/- 2.0% vs nonresponders: 10.0% +/- 2.1%, p < 0.05). Nonresponders were identified by Doppler sonography with a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.86, and positive predictive value of 0.9 when a threshold of 20% PVV reduction 120 min after drug intake was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler sonography is a useful tool for assessment of the acute portal hemodynamic effect of propranolol. To distinguish portal hemodynamic nonresponders from responders to propranolol, PVV measurements should be carried out 2 h after drug administration, and PVV reduction should be not <20% in propranolol responders.     

Lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptors and plasma catecholamines in patients with cirrhosis.

The hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis is heterogeneous. In some patients, there is an expected decrease in portal pressure, whereas in others, portal pressure fails to decrease despite adequate beta-blockade. It has been suggested that this lack of response could be related to down-regulation of beta 2-adrenoceptors, promoted by the increased adrenergic activity frequently found in decompensated cirrhosis. The present study investigated this hypothesis by measuring the density and affinity of lymphocyte beta 2-adrenoceptors (L-beta 2-AR), an established index of beta 2-adrenoceptors in target organs, and the plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine in a group of 32 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The portal pressure response to propranolol administration (0.1 mg/kg + 2 mg/h) was also investigated (n = 27). Patients with cirrhosis had increased norepinephrine levels (605 +/- 360 vs. 224 +/- 110 pg/mL in controls; P less than 0.001), but plasma epinephrine level was not increased (136 +/- 72 vs. 111 +/- 22 pg/mL in controls; NS). There were no differences between cirrhotic patients and controls in the density of L-beta 2-AR (1398 +/- 489 vs. 1278 +/- 356 receptors/cell; NS). Portal pressure decreased greater than 10% in 12 patients (responders) and less than 10% in the remaining 15 (nonresponders). Contrary to previous suggestions, there were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in relation to the density of L-beta 2-AR (1362 +/- 527 vs. 1487 +/- 419 receptors/cell; NS), to the affinity of these receptors (0.15 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.12 nmol/L; NS), to the plasma levels of norepinephrine (661 +/- 508 vs. 621 +/- 256 pg/mL; NS), and to plasma epinephrine concentration (141 +/- 90 vs. 140 +/- 75 pg/mL; NS). These results show that the response of portal pressure to propranolol administration is neither related to the density and affinity of L-beta 2-AR nor to the plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Thus, the determination of these parameters cannot substitute measurements of portal pressure to identify those patients with an adequate portal pressure response to propranolol treatment.     

Nicardipine Infusion Improved Hepatic Function But Failed to Reduce Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Patients with Cirrhosis

We investigated the effects of nicardipine on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics and on liver function in 16 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Patients received a continuous infusion of 0.3 mg/min of nicardipine (n = 10) and a control infusion (n = 6). No significant changes were observed after a control infusion. In contrast, systemic vasodilatation, evidenced by a significant fall in mean arterial pressure (-14%, p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance (-30%, p less than 0.01), increased heart rate (+8%, p less than 0.01) and cardiac output (+21%, p less than 0.01), and increased hepatic blood flow (+43%, p less than 0.01) were observed at 60 min after a continuous infusion of nicardipine. Although nicardipine improved hepatic function (intrinsic clearance from 0.29 +/- 0.13 to 0.33 +/- 0.15 L/min, p less than 0.05), portal pressure evaluated by hepatic venous pressure gradient was not reduced significantly (from 16.3 +/- 4.9 to 15.1 +/- 5.7 mm Hg; NS). We conclude that a continuous infusion of nicardipine improves liver function but has no beneficial effect on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis.     

Evaluation of the effects of molsidomine and propranolol-molsidomine combination on portal hemodynamics by pulsed Doppler ultrasound]

Molsidomine, a long acting vasodilator with antianginal properties, has been shown to decrease porto-hepatic pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis. The present study aimed at assessing the effects of molsidomine, propranolol and of the association of these two drugs on portal vein blood flow as measured using Doppler and B-mode sonography. In 10 patients without liver disease (group 1), portal flow time average mean velocity (TAV) and portal vein blood flow (PVBF) were measured under basal conditions, 1 hour then 2 hours after ingestion of 4 mg of molsidomine. The same measurements were performed in 15 patients with cirrhosis (group 2) under basal conditions, 1 then 2 hours after double-blind administration of either molsidomine (10 patients) or placebo (5 patients). Fifteen further patients with cirrhosis (group 3) were studied after the double blind administration of 80 mg of propranolol and two hours later of 4 mg of molsidomine (10 patients) or placebo (5 patients); TAV and PVBF were measured under basal conditions, two hours after propranolol ingestion or placebo, then one and two hours after molsidomine or placebo ingestion. TAV and PVBF remained unchanged in patients treated with placebo. Molsidomine reduced TAV by 23.8 +/- 19.5% in group 1 (P < 0.01) and by 25.6 +/- 21.4% in group 2 (P < 0.01). In group 3, a 10% decrease was observed after propranolol (NS). When molsidomine was added, TAV was further decreased (-17.6 +/- 13.3% vs baseline, P < 0.01). PVBF remained unchanged in the three groups of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)