Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in over 65-year-old men with inguinal hernias

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in over 65-year-old men who have inguinal hernias and discuss if pre-operative selective screening of this population is appropriate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study on 70 consecutive male patients with an age range of 65–88 years (mean, 74 years) who were referred to a single vascular consultant''s out-patient clinic with an inguinal hernia were screened for the presence of an AAA with an ultrasound scan before hernia repair over a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two patients were found to have an AAA measuring 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm giving an AAA prevalence of 3% (exact 95% confidence interval = 0–10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not demonstrate an increased AAA prevalence in over 65-year-old male patients with inguinal hernias, scanned pre-operatively when compared to screening programmes. Selective screening of this cohort cannot be justified on this evidence.     

LDL Cholesterol is Associated with Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between serum lipids and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: Two hundred and six males (>50 years) with AAA (> or =30 mm) detected in a population based screening programme were compared with 252 age-matched male controls in a nested case-control study. Smoking status, previous medical and family histories, height, weight, blood pressure, ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) and non-fasting lipid profile were recorded. RESULTS: Cases were found to have significantly higher LDL cholesterol than controls. LDL cholesterol was an independent predictor of the risk for aneurysms in a logistic regression model adjusting for smoking status, family history of AAA, history of ischaemic heart disease, presence of peripheral vascular disease, use of lipid lowering medication and treatment for hypertension. There was a linear effect with increased levels of LDL cholesterol increasing the risk of having a small aneurysm (test for trend p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The highly significant association between LDL cholesterol and small aneurysms suggests that LDL, possibly acting via inflammatory mediated matrix degeneration, could be an initiating factor in the development of AAA. The ability of statin therapy to prevent AAA formation requires further investigation.     

Implications of Attendance Patterns in Northern Ireland for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening

Introduction

Evidence supports the introduction of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme. The aims of this study were to estimate future disease patterns and to determine the effect of the proportion attending on the programme’s cost-effectiveness.

Patients and methods

The results of the local AAA screening programme were reviewed. Ultrasonic infrarenal aortic diameter of 30 mm was considered aneurysmal. Projected population numbers from the Department of Health and current disease prevalence were used to estimate future number of potential patients. The Multi-centre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) Markov model was used to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and 95% uncertainty intervals (UI), using a 30-year time horizon and 3.5% per annum discount, to determine the effect of attendance.

Results

Men were recruited from August 2004 to May 2010. 13316 were invited for a scan and 5931 (44.5%) attended. 321 AAA were diagnosed, giving a prevalence of 5.4%, while 27 large AAA (0.46%) were repaired. The annual incidence of AAA until 2021 will range from 441 to 526, with an incidence of 40–48 large AAA, with both showing a gradual increase with time. Using this attendance rate, the ICER was calculated at £2350 per life-year gained (95% UI: £1620–£4290), or £3020 per quality-adjusted life-year gained (95% UI: £2080–£5500).

Conclusions

The prevalence of disease in this local AAA screening was similar to other studies. The low attendance will result in many AAA being missed, but will not impact greatly on the long-term cost-effectiveness.     

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Using Non-imaging Hand-held Ultrasound Volume Scanner – A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is cost-effective and timely repair improves outcome. Using standard ultrasound (US) an AAA can be accurately diagnosed or ruled-out. However, this requires training and bulk equipment. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of a new hand-held ultrasound bladder volume indicator (BVI) in the setting of AAA screening. METHODS: In total, 94 patients (66 +/- 14 years, 67 men) referred for atherosclerotic disease were screened for the presence of AAA (diameter > 30 mm using US). All patients underwent both examinations, with US and BVI. Using the BVI, aortic volume was measured at 6 pre-defined points. Maximal diameters (US) and volumes (BVI) were used for analyses. RESULTS: In 54 (57%) patients an AAA was diagnosed using US. The aortic diameter by US correlated closely with aortic volume by BVI (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Using a cut-off value of > or = 50 ml for the presence of AAA by BVI, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of BVI in detection of AAA were 94%, 82%, 88% and 92%, respectively. The agreement between the two methods was 89%, kappa 0.78. CONCLUSION: The bladder volume indicator is a promising tool in screening patients for AAA.     

Predictors of development of anastomotic femoral pseudoaneurysms after aortobifemoral reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of anastomotic femoral pseudoaneurysms (AFPs) is still unclear. We have performed this long-term retrospective study of patients who underwent aortobifemoral reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in order to better establish the long-term rate of AFP and to identify the predictors of its late occurrence. METHODS: The long-term outcome of 178 patients who underwent and survived aortobifemoral reconstruction for infrarenal AAA was reviewed. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 28 AFPs developed in 19 patients. Six AFPs were recurrent. The mean linearized rate of AFPs was 1.88% per year. At 15 years, the survival-freedom rate from AFPs was 60%, and from repair of AFPs it was 62%. The survival-freedom rate from AFP was significantly poorer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.017; at 10 years: 64.3% versus 92.3%), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.0056; at 10 years: 59.2% versus 87.5%), current smoking (P <0.0001; at 10 years: 65.8% versus 94.5%), and postoperative inguinal wound infection (P <0.0001; at 10 years: 42.8% versus 86.8%). Multivariate analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (relative risk [RR]: 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 8.95), current smoking (RR: 5.38, 95% CI: 1.62 to 17.90), and postoperative inguinal wound infection (RR: 9.04, 95% CI: 2.76 to 29.96) were significantly associated with the development of AFPs. The linearized rate of AFPs was significantly higher only among current smokers (P <0.0001, 4.4% versus 0.8% per year) and among those who had inguinal wound infection (P = 0.001, 9.2% versus 1.5% per year). CONCLUSIONS: Current smoking and inguinal wound infection may contribute to the development of AFP after aortobifemoral reconstruction for AAA, likely by affecting reparative connective tissue mechanisms at the anastomotic site.     

Screening Cost for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Japan-Based Estimates

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening procedures in Japan economically focusing on the screening costs and the hospital costs for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery.Methods A total of 10057 residents, 60 years of age or older, including 4247 men and 5810 women, participated in the screening test for AAA using ultrasound.Results Aneurysms were detected in 34 participants, including 32 men and 2 women. The detection rate of AAA was 0.8% in men, 0.03% in women, and 0.3% in total. It cost US$8 to screen each participant, and the cost to detect each aneurysm was thus estimated at $1250 in men, $23240 in women, and $2366 in total. The difference in the mean hospital cost between ruptured and nonruptured AAA was $21833 in our recent cases. Obesity, male sex, and smoking habits were all significant risk factors for AAA.Conclusion Screening for AAA using ultrasound is useful not only for the early detection of AAA but also for a reduction in the overall medical cost.     

A prospective study of a hand-held ultrasound device in abdominal aortic aneurysm evaluation

PURPOSE: Effective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requires both early detection and timely repair to reduce aneurysm-related mortality. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the utility of a hand-held ultrasonography (US) device in AAA screening in a Veterans Affairs vascular surgical service. METHODS: During a 16-month period, patients with risk factors for AAA were evaluated in a blinded fashion with a hand-held US device performed by physicians. A conventional abdominal duplex US examination was also performed by a certified vascular ultrasonographer. Results of the hand-held US was compared with the conventional duplex US examination. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were evaluated (97 men, mean age 67 +/- 6.3 years). The mean times for hand-held and conventional duplex US examinations were 5.3 +/- 3.2 minutes and 3.1 +/- 2.4 minutes (not significant), respectively. Using the conventional duplex US as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the hand-held device in detecting a AAA were 93% and 97%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of the hand-held device were 89% and 98%, respectively. The likelihood ratios of positive and negative tests of the hand-held US device examination were 82 and 0.14, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the hand-held US device as compared with the conventional duplex US was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: A hand-held portable US device is effective and accurate in AAA screening with results comparable to the conventional abdominal duplex examination. Moreover, hand-held portable US for AAA screening can be performed expeditiously during physical examination. It should be used as an extension in routine physical examination in vascular patients.     

The Long-term Benefits of a Single Scan for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) at Age 65

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of a single ultrasonic scan at age 65 to identify patients at risk from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHOD: A total of 6058 men aged 64-81 were recruited to a randomised trial, and 3000 were invited to attend a single screening test. An additional population of 1011 men was offered screening as they reached age 65. If a normal aorta was identified in this sub-group, further scans were offered at two-yearly intervals. Follow up and treatment of those identified as having an aortic dilatation of 3 cm or greater was undertaken. All subject groups were monitored for deaths occurring over the study period, and date and cause of death were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2212 men attended screening in the randomised trial; the overall compliance was 74%, and prevalence of AAA was 7.7%. Compliance decreased, and prevalence increased, with age. Mortality from ruptured AAA was reduced by 68% at 5 years (screened group compared to the age-matched control population), and by 42% in the study arm (screened and refusers) compared with controls. The benefit persisted at ten years (53% and 21% respectively). Of the uncontrolled sample of 1011 men offered a scan at age 65, 681 attended and 649 of these were found to have a normal aortic diameter; re-screening demonstrated new aneurysm development in 4% over ten years. The aortic diameters of the new AAAs were under 4 cm and would therefore have a low risk of rupture.1 Mortality from rupture in all those with an initially normal aortic diameter was low, at 1 case per 1000 scans over ten years. CONCLUSION: Screening once for AAA at age 65 can identify the majority of AAA that are of clinical significance and can identify a large population at low risk from rupture who do not require surveillance. This policy has been effective when combined with selective treatment in reducing the risk of rupture for ten years in those who attend the screening programme.     

Hospital resource use and costs among abdominal aortic aneurysm repair patients admitted to the intensive care unit

BackgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. As a result, many of these patients are monitored postoperatively in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about resource utilization and costs associated with ICU admission in this population. We sought to evaluate predictors of total costs among patients admitted to the ICU after repair of nonruptured or ruptured AAA.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data (2011-2016) of ICU patients admitted after AAA repair. The primary outcome was total hospital costs. We used elastic net regression to identify pre-ICU admission predictors of hospitalization costs separately for nonruptured and ruptured AAA patients.ResultsWe included 552 patients in the analysis. Of these, 440 (79.7%) were admitted after repair of nonruptured AAA, and 112 (20.3%) were admitted after repair of ruptured AAA. The mean age of patients with nonruptured AAA was 74 (standard deviation, 9) years, and the mean age of patients with ruptured AAA was 70 (standard deviation, 8) years. Median total hospital cost (in Canadian dollars) was $21,555 (interquartile range, $17,798-$27,294) for patients with nonruptured AAA and $33,709 (interquartile range, $23,173-$53,913) for patients with ruptured AAA. Among both nonruptured and ruptured AAA patients, increasing age, illness severity, use of endovascular repair, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and excessive blood loss (≥4000 mL) were associated with increased costs, whereas having an anesthesiologist with vascular subspecialty training was associated with lower costs.ConclusionsPatient-, procedure-, and clinician-specific variables are associated with costs in patients admitted to the ICU after repair of AAA. These factors may be considered future targets in initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness in this population.     

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms during a basic medical checkup in residents of a Japanese rural community

To determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and the size distribution of the abdominal aortic diameter in the Japanese population, 1591 residents of a farming community were screened by ultrasonography during the annual basic medical checkup arranged by the town. The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 17.2 ± 2.2 mm and four AAAs were found (0.3%), all in men aged 60 years or older, three of whom were hypertensive. The mean diameter of the common iliac artery was 10.2 ± 5.1 mm and five iliac arterial aneurysms were found (0.3%). One man had both aortic and iliac arterial aneurysms. The iliac arterial aneurysms were also found in men, four of whom were aged 60 years or older and had a smoking habit. We were able to keep the cost of screening low by combining the program with an annual basic medical checkup. These findings indicate that it is important to examine the iliac artery as well as the abdominal aorta because the incidence of aneurysm is similar in both. Screening for AAAs using ultrasonography is accurate enough to detect them before rupture, and can be effectively performed in men aged 60 years or older during their annual basic medical checkup. Received: May 14, 1999 / Accepted: March 24, 2000     

The case for expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm screening

Both the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence are re-evaluating their screening paradigms for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Currently, most countries that screen for AAA do so only in male ever-smokers between the ages of 65 and 75 years and in patients with a family history of AAA. However, these recommendations are based primarily on screening trials predating the endovascular era. The wider applicability of endovascular aneurysm repair and its safety profile, especially in the elderly, have changed the risk-benefit of repair and, by extension, screening. This is despite the decreasing prevalence of AAA thanks to improved medical therapies and lower smoking rates. This evidence summary critically examines the evidence behind screening and the potential for expanded screening.     

单中心近10年腹主动脉瘤1246例流行病学研究

目的 回顾性分析近10年中国医科大学附属第一医院收治的腹主动脉瘤（AAA）病人的流行病学特点，为研究近10年AAA流行病学变化趋势，以及为AAA的进一步预防和诊治提供依据。方法 纳入自2011年1月至2020年12月中国医科大学附属第一医院诊治的1246例AAA病人的病案资料，回顾性分析包括病人年龄、性别、就诊时间、就诊科室、首发症状、住院时间、住院费用、术式选择等信息，分析近10年AAA流行病学变化特点。结果 入院病人平均年龄为（66.9±10.5）岁，男女占比约为4∶1。男性AAA病人以同型半胱氨酸升高为主，女性以血脂升高为主。AAA病人的主要合并症为3级高血压（41.9%）、冠心病（31.1%）和合并髂动脉瘤（25.8%）。男性AAA合并髂动脉瘤比率明显高于女性（27.8% vs.17.8%，P＜0.01）。72.7%的AAA病人首诊原因为体检发现，其次是AAA破裂（18.7%）。AAA病人急诊与门诊就诊例数呈逐年升高态势，急诊与门诊就诊占比约为2∶3。65~69岁为现阶段住院病人主要年龄段。各年份男性占比约为80%，年龄段65~69岁为男性占比可达近90%。各年份腔内修复术（EVAR）是AAA的主要治疗方式，行EVAR治疗病人的例数和比例总体趋势逐年增加，行EVAR治疗的占比随病人年龄增加而逐渐增大。近10年AAA病人的病死率呈降低趋势，2015年后病死率总体维持在2%～3%，以男性为主，年龄段70~74岁的病死率最高为5.8%。AAA病人平均住院（17.0±16.4）d，平均住院费用为（11.3±10.7）万元。结论 近10年AAA住院病人有逐年增高趋势，主要患病人群为年龄＞60岁男性，男女临床特点有较大差异。采用EVAR治疗的占比逐年增加。对于老年AAA人群，尤其是年龄段65~69岁男性AAA病人，在AAA的防治过程中应给予更多关注。     

The population prevalence of undetected abdominal aortic aneurysm in New Zealand Māori

BackgroundThe prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Polynesian populations such as the New Zealand Māori has not been characterized. We measured this in a large population-based sample.MethodsA cross-sectional population-based prevalence study was conducted as part of an AAA screening pilot; 2467 Māori men aged 54 to 74 years and 1526 women aged 65 to 74 years registered with a primary care practice in Auckland (New Zealand) were invited to be screened by abdominal ultrasound between June 2016 and March 2018. Patients with pre-existing AAA disease and those with terminal conditions or circumstances that would make them unlikely to benefit from screening were excluded. The prevalence rate of AAA in Māori women was calculated with a cutoff definition of 27 mm as well as with the normal 30-mm definition (used in men). A log-binomial regression model estimated the prevalence rate at exactly 65 years for the purpose of comparison with screened populations in the United Kingdom.ResultsThe crude prevalence rate of undiagnosed AAA in Māori men aged 60 to 74 years was 3.6%. In women, it was 1.7% at the 30-mm threshold and 2.3% at 27 mm. The prevalence rate at exactly 65 years of age was calculated from the log-binomial regression model to be 2.7% (confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-3.8%) in men, 0.9% (CI, 0.4%-2.2%) in women at the 30-mm threshold, and 1.5% (CI, 0.7%-3.0%) in women at the 27-mm threshold. Among smokers, the crude prevalence rates were 7.5% (CI, 4.9%-11.5%) in men and 6.9% (CI, 4.1%-11.5%) in women (30 mm+).ConclusionsThe prevalence of undiagnosed AAA in New Zealand Māori men is considerably higher than in screened populations of equivalent age in the United Kingdom and Sweden. Prevalence rates in New Zealand Māori women are close to those of screened British men. New Zealand should consider implementing a population-based screening program for Māori men and conduct further research into the health impact of screening Māori women.     

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm with electronic clinical reminders

Background

Based on randomized, population-based screening protocols, a single ultrasound examination reduces mortality from an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by facilitating elective surgical intervention before rupture. Ultrasound screening is accurate, noninvasive, inexpensive, and cost effective. By using a comprehensive electronic medical record, we inquired whether an age-prompted clinical reminder would facilitate the detection of AAA.

Methods

The AAA risk screen was installed in May 2007 via a computerized patient record system prompt for male veterans ages 65 to 75 who ever smoked. This abbreviated ultrasound examination uses a 3.5- to 4-MHz scan head, measures anteroposterior and transverse planes, and reports the largest infrarenal aortic diameter.

Results

Of 1437 examinations there were 73 AAAs of 3.0-cm diameter or larger (5.1%); 33 AAAs of 4.0-cm diameter or larger (2.3%); 15 AAAs of 5.0-cm diameter or larger (1.0%); and 11 AAAs of 5.5-cm diameter or larger (.77%). Fifty (68%) received counseling for abnormal findings.

Conclusions

Recognition of newly diagnosed AAA compared favorably with that of previous screening studies. Electronic clinical reminders identify undiagnosed, life-threatening AAAs before rupture. Immediate counseling is available in the vascular setting.     

Diabetes mellitus is not associated with major morbidity following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background

It has been suggested that there is an increased morbidity and mortality risk for diabetics undergoing elective aortic surgery. This, however, is not universally accepted. In this study, we utilize a national database to determine if diabetes is associated with adverse outcomes following open, elective, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients who underwent an open, elective, nonruptured AAA repair from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared by diabetes status. Multivariate analysis was performed adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

There were 2110 American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients who underwent an open, elective, nonruptured AAA repair during this time period. Of these patients, 245 (11.6%) had diabetes mellitus. The overall mortality rate was 3.7% (5.3% for diabetics and 3.5% for nondiabetics, P = 0.171).On bivariate analysis, diabetics were more likely to present preoperatively with cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in mortality or in cardiac, pulmonary, or renal complications. Diabetics were more likely to develop superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) (4.5% versus 1.6%, P = 0.002).On multivariate regression, there was no difference in mortality or major complications between diabetics and nondiabetics (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.68–2.71). Diabetics, however, were almost three times more likely to develop superficial SSIs (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.29–6.00).

Conclusions

Diabetes mellitus is not associated with significantly worse major outcomes following open, elective, infrarenal AAA repair. Diabetics, however, are more likely to develop superficial SSIs.     

Community-Based, Nonprofit Organization-Sponsored Ultrasonography Screening Program for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Is Effective at Identifying Occult Aneurysms

Early diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), prior to rupture, is vital for optimizing patient survival. An abdominal ultrasonography examination of an asymptomatic individual to check for the presence of an AAA, however, is not presently reimbursed by health insurance in the United States. This article reports the results of one nonprofit, community-based screening program, run by Aneurysm Outreach, Inc. (AOI; www.alink.org). AOI offered free screening for AAA to anyone who met the criteria of being (1) over 60 years old; (2) over 50 years old, male, and with positive family history for AAA; or (3) over 55 years old, female, and with positive family history for AAA. AOI organized 21 ultrasonographic screening events between September 2001 and November 2004, and the number of participants per event varied from 24 to 240. Altogether 3,088 individuals met the screening criteria and 22 of them were already known to have AAAs. Thirty-six (1.2%) individuals were excluded from the final analysis due to poor quality of the ultrasonographic images. Among the remaining 3,030 individuals, a dilatation of the aorta was detected and confirmed in 61 (2.0%) individuals, in 4.3% of the screened males and in 0.6% of the screened females. Thirteen individuals had their AAAs repaired surgically. The frequencies of males and current smokers were significantly higher in the AAA group than in the group with normal-size aorta (male AAA 83.6% vs. normal 42.0%, p < 0.0001; smoker AAA 54.9% vs. normal 18.1%, p < 0.0001). The mean age was significantly higher in the AAA group than in the group with normal-size aorta (AAA 71.0 ± 6.2 vs. normal 68.4 ± 7.0, p = 0.005). In conclusion, the results of this community-based free ultrasonographic screening program are in agreement with randomized controlled screening programs and emphasize the need for systematic screening programs and the importance of finding individuals harboring AAAs before their rupture.     

Selection for screening for familial aortic aneurysms.

The reported familial clustering of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) indicates the possible rewards of family-based screening programmes with respect both to the number of asymptomatic aneurysms detected and to identifying associated genes. Ultrasonographic screening of 28 families (25 brothers and 28 sisters) was carried out together with collecting a history and a blood sample for analysis of the cholesterol level and genetic markers. Among the screened siblings six (11 per cent), all > 60 years old, had an AAA > or = 3.0 cm in diameter. A further 11 siblings (21 per cent), six of whom were < 60 years old, had a wide (2.5-2.9 cm) aorta. The presence of an aneurysmal or wide aorta was significantly associated with smoking (P = 0.027), male sex (P = 0.008) and a proband age of < 60 years (P = 0.031). Polymorphic genetic markers for type III collagen and haptoglobin were not informative in these families. These results indicate that the efficiency of screening siblings of patients with AAA could be improved by limiting it to brothers with a smoking history and/or siblings of younger patients. The familial component appears to be greatest in these younger patients.     

Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm in an Asian population

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are common in the Caucasian population. Apart from reported differences in the occurrence of AAA in the black and white populations, there are few studies on the incidence of AAA in the Asian population. Methods: A prospective database of all patients with AAA seen between 1996 and 1999, in the South‐East Asian state of Sarawak in Borneo Island, was analysed. The demographic data included patient's age, sex, ethnic group, date of diagnosis, comorbidities, presentations and treatment outcomes. These were compared with the state population's demographic statistics. Results: Diagnoses of AAA were made in 123 patients during the study period. The male to female ratio was 3.5 : 1. The age range was 39?88 years with a median age of 70 years. Four patients were younger than 55 years. The incidence rate for the at‐risk male population older than 50 years was 25.6/100 000. The incidence rate reached 78.3/100 000 for males older than 70 years. The incidence rate for females older than 50 years was 7.6/100 000 and for those older than 70 years it was 18.7/100 000. All races were affected. Smoking, hypertension or respiratory disorders were present in more than 40% of the patients. Half of the patients underwent surgical repair. Conclusion: This study shows that AAA in this Asian population is not uncommon and the incidence is comparable to the Western world.     

Screening of siblings to patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden

Objective. The prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) is higher for First Degree Relatives to AAA-patients compared to the general population, regardless of sex. The prevalence of AAA is also higher in the North of Sweden compared to the Mid and South. A regional strong hereditary trait has been suggested as an explanation to this. The aim of this study was to investigate if siblings to AAA-patients in the North have a higher prevalence of AAA compared to siblings in the Mid-region. Design. Cohort study. Materials and Methods. All patients treated for AAA in a northern region (Norrbotten county, North) were screened for siblings. Consenting siblings, age 40–80, were examined (n?=?379) with ultrasound. The results were compared to the previously published results of 150 ultrasound-screened siblings in the Mid-region (Stockholm county). Results. The male/female ratio in the sibling cohort was 48% vs 52%. The prevalence of AAA in siblings in the North was 37/379 (brothers 14%, sisters 6%). This was not different from the prevalence among the Mid-region siblings 16/150 (brothers 17%, sisters 6% (p?=?0.75). The distribution of risk factors was similar in the two regions. Conclusion. The results reinforce the importance of a more systematic approach towards selective screening of all siblings to AAA patients. Ultrasound should be performed in all eligible siblings, since the distribution of AAA is similar over regions. A correlation between the familial distribution and the reported high prevalence of AAA in general population in the North could not be shown.