Effect of postmenopausal oestradiol and dydrogesterone therapy on lipoproteins and insulin sensitivity,secretion and elimination in hysterectomised women

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in depth the metabolic effects of oestradiol-17 beta both alone and in combination with the progestagen dydrogesterone. METHODS: Fifteen hysterectomised postmenopausal women were studied before treatment and after 24 weeks taking oestradiol-17 beta alone (2 mg per day), then following a further 6 (oestrogen-alone phase) and 12 (oestrogen plus progestagen phase) weeks with inclusion of dydrogesterone (10 mg per day for days 17-28 of each 28 day cycle). Measurements at each visit included fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination by modelling analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations, body fat distribution by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and arterial function by carotid artery ultrasound. RESULTS: Significant reductions were seen throughout in total and LDL cholesterol. The net reductions in total and LDL cholesterol by the end of the study were 5.8% (P<0.05) and 18.4% (P<0.001), respectively. HDL and HDL subfraction cholesterol concentrations rose during treatment with oestradiol alone, the rise being primarily in the HDL(2) subfraction (+21.6%, P<0.001). Fasting serum triglycerides rose 30% on oestradiol treatment. These increases were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone. Insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination, body fat distribution and arterial function were not significantly affected at any stage of the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The small study sample and high variability in measures of glucose and insulin metabolism may have contributed to the absence of the expected significant improvement in these parameters. Orally administered oestradiol had beneficial effects on total, LDL and HDL cholesterol which were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone.     

Effects of high dose oestrogen therapy on circulating inflammatory markers

Introduction

Whilst initial studies suggested HRT reduced the incidence of coronary heart disease, recent studies have suggested HRT increases cardiovascular risk. The route of HRT administration appears important with oral oestrogen significantly increasing levels of inflammatory markers and transdermal oestrogen causing no such changes. As the effects of the very high levels of oestrogen taken by male to female transsexuals are poorly understood this study has compared the changes occurring in circulating inflammatory markers following 6 months oral or transdermal oestrogen therapy.

Materials and methods

23 patients (mean age 36 ± 10 years) about to commence oral oestrogen were enrolled into Group 1. Group 2 comprised 7 patients (mean age 47 ± 6 years) about to commence transdermal oestrogen. Plasma lipids (total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL cholesterol); cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα); antioxidants (superoxide dismutase, total nitric oxide, glutathione) and clotting factors (Factor V11, Factor V111, Factor 1X, fibrinogen) were measured after 0, 2, 4 and 6 months treatment.

Results

No significant differences were found in plasma lipid levels. Group 1 patients showed significantly raised levels of IL-6, IL-1 and IL-8 during the first 2–4 months of treatment. Thereafter levels fell. Levels of SOD, FV11 and FV1X in Group 1 also increased over the study period. Patients receiving transdermal oestrogen showed elevated levels of GSH in the second month of treatment, but no significant changes in any of the other parameters measured. The rise in levels of IL-1 and Factor IX in the second month of treatment was significantly higher in the oral group than in the transdermal group. No other significant differences between the treatment groups were found.

Conclusion

Transsexual patients receiving oral oestrogen showed significant changes in inflammatory markers involved in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. No such changes were associated with transdermal oestrogen. Changes in two inflammatory markers were significantly greater than among patients receiving transdermal oestrogen.     

Effects on lipids and lipoproteins in women treated with oestradiol and progesterone

Thirty women with climacteric symptoms were treated for 4 months with 2 mg 17β-oestradiol and different doses of progesterone (50, 100 or 200 mg). The concentrations of total and free cholesterol, phospholipids, triglycerides (TG), apoprotein A1 and apoprotein B were determined in high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) fractions and in serum. HDL levels increased and LDL levels decreased, while TG levels in VLDL remained unchanged, which indicates that the lipoprotein pattern is oestrogen-induced and that progesterone exerts little or no influence.     

Changes in lipoproteins and subfractions following oophorectomy and oestrogen replacement in peri-menopausal women

Serum cholesterol concentrations in lipoprotein fractions and subfractions were determined in 11 peri-menopausal women both before and after bilateral oophorectomy, as well as 60 days after commencement of oral oestradiol replacement therapy. Pre-operatively, all subjects were found to have normal lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. There was a post-operative increase in the total cholesterol level, which was attributed to a raised very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol. Changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions HDL-2 and HDL-3 were noted but since these were compensatory little difference in total HDL cholesterol was observed. Following oral oestrogen replacement, the cholesterol level decreased as a result of a drop in both VLDL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The oestradiol-induced HDL cholesterol increment reflected an increase in the levels of both HDL subfractions.     

Positive effects on cardiovascular and breast metabolic markers of oral estradiol and dydrogesterone in comparison with transdermal estradiol and norethisterone acetate

Objectives: To assess differences in two sequential combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products on selected cardiovascular and breast metabolic markers. The products were different concerning the route of administration of estradiol and its combined progestin, either oral or transdermal, and the androgenic properties of progestogens, respectively, dydrogesterone and norethisterone acetate. Methods: One hundred and nineteen healthy non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were included in this open, multi-center, two parallel group trial. They were randomized to a treatment of six 28-day cycles with oral estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone (oE2/D10) or a sequential combination patch of estradiol plus norethisterone acetate (tdE/NETA). At baseline and after six cycles the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), the sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and the total insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) blood levels were determined by a central laboratory. A total of 89 women were compliant to the protocol. Results: After six cycles, a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) concerning HDL-C, SHBG and IGF-I levels was found between the two treatment groups. The HDL-C levels were increased in the oE2/D10 group and decreased in the tdE/NETA group, with a final difference of about 0.3 mmol/l. The oE2/D10 treatment induced a sharp increase (about 57 mmol/l) in SHBG levels. IGF-I levels decreased with both the products, but the difference in favor of the oE2/D10 treatment was of about 30 ng/ml. Moreover, patients on tdE/NETA with an IGF-I baseline value below the median showed an increase. Conclusion: Oral estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone, a non-androgenic progestogen, induced positive changes of some cardiovascular (HDL-C) and breast (SHBG and IGF-I) metabolic markers. These effects were significantly different from those obtained with a transdermal estradiol associated to an androgenic progestogen.     

Oral estradiol and dydrogesterone combination therapy in postmenopausal women: Review of efficacy and safety

HRT is known to be effective for the relief of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis. HRT should be tailored to the woman, enhancing the beneficial effects of the treatment while minimizing the risks. It is difficult to evaluate data on particular preparations of HRT and the different dosages in isolation. The purpose of this review is to highlight the efficacy and safety specific to oral estradiol and dydrogesterone combinations of four different dose strengths. A systematic literature search using Medline was carried out to identify studies containing efficacy or safety data. The findings of the retrieved publications confirm that estradiol and dydrogesterone combinations give very effective menopausal symptom relief and prevention of osteoporosis whilst maintaining a good safety profile. Data also show that these combinations of HRT give additional benefit to certain metabolic parameters including lipids, insulin, glucose and body fat distribution. By selecting the treatment and dose most suitable for each individual woman at her particular stage of menopause, the benefits can be optimized whilst mitigating the risks. HRT plays an important role in improving and maintaining women's health when used appropriately.     

Formation of ethinylestradiol in postmenopausal women during continuous treatment with a combination of estradiol, estriol and norethisterone acetate

Previous studies indicated that during treatment of postmenopausal women with preparations containing norethisterone, a small proportion of the progestogen is aromatized into ethinylestradiol. We therefore investigated the serum concentrations of estradiol, ethinylestradiol and norethisterone in 25 patients of a gynecological practice who were continuously treated for climacteric complaints with a combination of 2 mg estradiol, 1 mg estriol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate for a time period between 4 months and 6 years. Blood sampling occurred between 1 and 20 h after intake of the last tablet. The mean serum concentration of estradiol was 138 ± 50 (53–279) pg/ml, of ethinylestradiol 18.1 ± 13.5 (0–44) pg/ml, and of norethisterone 5.1 ± 3.5 (0.7–11.6) ng/ml. The serum concentrations of estradiol showed a broad maximum between 1 and 14 h, and those of norethisterone a steep rise to maximum within 1–4 h after intake followed by a subsequent decline. Contrary to this, the ethinylestradiol levels were not related to the time after application indicating that the aromatization of norethisterone mainly occurs in peripheral tissue. There was no correlation between age, body mass index or duration of treatment and the ethinylestradiol levels. It is concluded that in the presence of the high estradiol concentrations the low conversion rate of norethisterone into ethinylestradiol is probably without clinical significance.     

Comparison between 1 year oral and transdermal oestradiol and sequential norethisterone acetate on circulating concentrations of leptin in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Oral and transdermal postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) affects lipid and glucose metabolism differently, which is of significance in the release of leptin by adipocytes. Moreover, oestrogen and progesterone can stimulate leptin secretion in women of reproductive age. Therefore, we compared the effects of oral and transdermal oestrogen plus progestin regimen on plasma leptin in 38 healthy postmenopausal women with normal body mass index (BMI), who wished to use HRT to control incapacitating climacteric symptoms. METHODS: The women were randomized to treatment with oral HRT (2 mg oestradiol on days 1--12, 2 mg oestradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) on days 13--22, and 1 mg oestradiol on days 23--28, n = 19), or with transdermal HRT (50 microg/day of oestradiol on days 1--13, and 50 microg oestradiol plus 250 microg/day NETA on days 14--28, n = 19) for 1 year. Plasma samples were collected before and at oestradiol + NETA phase after 2, 6 and 12 months treatment and were assayed for leptin. RESULTS: The baseline leptin, ranging from 3.3 to 34.9 microg/l, was significantly associated with BMI (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001 ), but showed no difference between women in oral HRT (geometric mean 13.9 microg/l, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.1--17.6 microg/l) or transdermal HRT group (geometric mean 12.0 microg/l, 95% CI 9.7--14.3 microg/l). Neither oral nor transdermal oestradiol + NETA caused any significant changes in plasma leptin (or BMI) after 2, 6, or 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSION: Leptin is an unsuitable factor to detect oestradiol + NETA-induced metabolic changes in postmenopausal women.     

Trajectories of inflammatory markers and cognitive decline over 10 years

We aimed to examine trajectories of inflammatory markers and cognitive decline over 10 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) trajectory components (slope, variability, and baseline level) and cognitive decline among 1323 adults, aged 70–79 years in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. We tested for interactions by sex and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. In models adjusted for multiple covariates and comorbidities, extreme CRP variability was significantly associated with cognitive decline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–2.3). This association was modified by sex and APOE e4 (p < 0.001 for both), such that the association remained among women (HR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 3.0) and among those with no APOE e4 allele (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.5). There were no significant associations between slope or baseline level of CRP and cognitive decline nor between interleukin-6 and cognitive decline. We believe CRP variability likely reflects poor control of or greater changes in vascular or metabolic disease over time, which in turn is associated with cognitive decline.     

A placebo-controlled trial of ethinyl oestradiol and norethisterone in climacteric women

A placebo-controlled trial has shown that 15 μg of ethinyl oestradiol is as effective as 25 μg daily in reducing both menopausal symptoms and the urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline. Norethisterone 5 mg daily also showed a significant reduction in the climacteric symptoms but was less effective than either of the ethinyl oestradiol doses.     

Absorption of percutaneous oestradiol in postmenopausal women

Seven postmenopausal women have been treated daily with 3 mg oestradiol percutaneously applied upon the skin. Blood samples were drawn at 8-h intervals during a 4-day period and on days 5, 7 and 9 from the beginning of the treatment. Plasma oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were determined by radioimmunoassay on these samples.The plasma E2 level was significantly increased at the 12th hour (73 ± 17 pg/ml) but the maximal plasma concentration was obtained only at the third day of treatment (110 ± 24 pg/ml). Thereafter the mean plasma concentration was more stable.Increments in E1 were smaller and the plasma $\text{E2}\text{E1}$ ratio was 1.51.Plasma FSH and LH did not change significantly during the course of the treatment.Thus the percutaneous administration of E2 appears to be an effective and safe method of delivering E2 into the circulation, and mimicking the physiologic condition. The advantages of this method are discussed.     

The effect of tibolone versus continuous combined norethisterone acetate and oestradiol on memory, libido and mood of postmenopausal women: a pilot study

Objective: Several studies have shown a positive effect of oestrogen on memory, mood and well-being but these data are controversial and focus particularly on the effect of oestrogen alone. In this pilot study we have investigated the effect of a continuous combination of norethisterone acetate 1 mg and oestradiol valerate 2 mg (Kliogest®) versus tibolone (Livial®) on memory, sexuality and mood. Methods: Twenty-two postmenopausal women, age range 51–57, were randomised to a 6 months single blind interventional study treatment with either continuous combined oestradiol plus norethisterone acetate, or tibolone. Computerised psychological test of memory, mood and libido were administered both before and at the end of the 6 months treatment. Results: Fourteen patients completed the study; eight on Livial® and six on Kliogest®. Recognition memory was improved by Kliogest but not by Livial (P<0.05) while either drug equally improved both the reaction time (P<0.01) and accuracy of performance (P<0.001) of categorical semantic memory. Both the treatments improved libido significantly (P<0.05), while the mood did not change with either. Conclusion: The results suggest that both these forms of hormonal replacement therapy improve the efficiency of memory performance and libido. However, a combination of oestradiol and norethisterone acetate seems to be marginally more effective on improving cognitive processes.     

Bioavailability of norethisterone acetate alone and in combination with estradiol administered in single or multiple oral doses to postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES: Twenty-four postmenopausal women were randomly allocated to a cross-over trial for an investigation of the pharmacokinetics of norethisterone acetate (NETA; 0.5 mg), administered alone or in combination with estradiol (E2; 1 mg), both after a single oral dose. In a second trial, the above combination of 0.5 mg NETA with 1 mg E2 was administered daily for 28 days. METHODS: Plasma levels of NET, E2, estrone (E1) and estrone sulphate fraction containing an admixture of estrone glucuronide (E1S/E1G) were measured by radioimmunoassay at various intervals up to 72 h in the first trial and at the same intervals after the 28th day in the second trial. RESULTS: In the first, single-dose trial, pharmacokinetic parameters of NET were similar for NETA administered alone and its combination with E2. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under curve values AUC0-24 and AUC0-infinity and no apparent major differences were observed for other pharmacokinetic parameters. No carry-over effects due to the cross-over design were seen. The multiple dosage in the second trial did not cause any major changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of NET, except for the AUC0-24 and AUC0-infinity values which were significantly higher than those seen in the first trial. The levels of E2 exhibited, shortly after the intake of E2, a rapid burst. The levels gradually decreased to a nadir followed by an increase to the main peak and by the subsequent elimination phase. The difference between the peak and nadir levels was significant (P < 0.05) in the second, multiple-dose trial. This bimodal pattern was not observed in earlier studies. The main metabolite of E2 was E1S/E1G, followed by E1, as could be seen from the AUC0-infinity values. These were, in both trials, approximately 300 and 7-times higher for the E1S/E1G and E1, respectively, than those for E2. For all analytes, the AUC0-24 values were significantly higher in the second trial than those found in the first trial, indicating accumulation upon repeated administration. Pharmacokinetics of all analytes remained linear in the second trial, as follows from the statistically established equality of AUC0-24 found in the second, multiple-dose trial with AUC0-infinity in the first, single-dose trial. The absorption half-life and t-max values of E1S/E1G appeared to be considerably shorter than those of E1 in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of NET was not influenced by its combination with 1 mg E2. The most abundant metabolite of E2 was the E1S/E1G fraction, which may have served as the main source of E2 and other estrogens due to metabolic interconversions during the absorption and elimination phases.     

Serum lipids and lipoproteins in postmenopausal women receiving transdermal oestrogen in combination with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device

To compare the effects of a non-oral combination of a transdermal oestradiol patch (50 μg daily) and an intrauterine device (IUD) releasing 20 μg of levonorgestrel daily on the serum pattern of lipids and lipoproteins with an established oral regimen of a daily dose of 2 mg of oestradiol and 1 mg of noretisterone acetate. Methods: An open, randomized study comprised of 40 healthy, early postmenopausal women. Results: During 1 year the concentration of total cholesterol decreased 5.0% in the LNg-IUD group and 10.6% in the oral therapy group; HDL cholesterol decreased 10.9% and 12.8%, respectively, and HDL₂ cholesterol decreased 18.1% and 26.9%, respectively. LDL cholesterol values did not change in the LNg-IUD group, whereas a 10.3% decrease was observed in the oral therapy group. Triglyceride values did not change in either group. There were no significant differences in the serum lipoprotein changes between the groups during the treatment. Conclusions: The use of a non-oral regimen of hormone replacement therapy has been advocated to minimize the effect of steroids on the liver. Its effects on the serum pattern of lipids and lipoproteins, however, did not differ significantly from those induced by a continuous oral treatment regimen.     

Elevated high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and normal triglycerides as markers of longevity

Summary Serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides of 85 year old home-living persons were compared to those of controls and of patients who had severe coronary artery disease (CAD) at an early age. Eightyfive-year-olds had higher serum HDL cholesterol than controls and patients with CAD. Patients with severe CAD had higher serum total cholesterol and serum triglycerides and lower HDL-cholesterol than other groups. When 85-year-old persons were divided into quintiles according to serum HDL cholesterol, women with highest HDL cholesterol had lowest mortality, men with lowest HDL cholesterol had highest mortality. We conclude that elevated HDL cholesterol is correlating with longevity and low HDL cholesterol with CAD at an early age.Abbreviations HDL high density lipoprotein - CAD coronary artery disease     

The effect of various menopausal hormone therapies on markers of inflammation, coagulation, fibrinolysis, lipids, and lipoproteins in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: Androgenic progestins such as norethisterone acetate (NETA) may influence the effect of estradiol (E(2)) therapy. We compared the influence of oral E(2), with and without NETA, and transdermal E(2) on markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and inflammation and on lipids and lipoproteins in healthy postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A total of 112 healthy postmenopausal women were randomized to receive treatment with either oral E(2), with or without NETA, transdermal E(2), or placebo. At baseline and after 28 weeks, levels of serum lipids and lipoproteins and markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, and inflammation were determined. RESULTS: Of the fibrinolytic parameters, oral E(2) (P < 0.05) and E(2) with NETA (P < 0.01) shortened euglobulin clot lysis time. Oral E(2) decreased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity (P < 0.05). Oral E(2) with NETA reduced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen levels (P < 0.01) and increased D-dimer antigen levels (P < 0.001). All three modes of menopausal hormone therapy reduced tissue type plasminogen activator antigen. Of the coagulation parameters, both routes of E(2) therapy decreased fibrinogen levels (P = 0.002 for oral and P = 0.007 for transdermal E(2)), whereas E(2) with NETA showed no effect. The decrease of fibrinogen was larger after oral E(2) (P = 0.02). Oral E(2) with NETA reduced antithrombin III (P < 0.001) and protein C (P < 0.001) activity. Oral E(2) (P = 0.04) and E(2) with NETA (P < 0.01) increased C-reactive protein (CRP). Transdermal E(2) showed no influence on CRP. The addition of NETA influenced the change in CRP, as the increase in CRP was more pronounced after E(2) without NETA (P = 0.005). The levels of serum amyloid A, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha did not change significantly after any of the modes of hormone therapy. Of the lipids and lipoproteins, oral E2 decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.01), lipoprotein (a) (P < 0.05), and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.05). Transdermal E(2) decreased triglycerides (P < 0.02) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.03). Oral E(2) with NETA decreased total cholesterol (P < 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Oral E(2), with or without NETA, produced no net activation of coagulation but improved fibrinolysis. Both modes of oral menopausal hormone therapy have a greater impact on markers of inflammation, coagulation, fibrinolysis, lipids, and lipoproteins than transdermal E(2). NETA attenuates some E(2) effects. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of these effects on clinical endpoints.     

Effects of ospemifene, a novel SERM, on vascular markers and function in healthy, postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: Ospemifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), shows promise for bone preservation in postmenopausal women. This study examined the effects of ospemifene on different vascular surrogate markers. DESIGN: A double-blinded study was conducted in 160 healthy, postmenopausal women who used, in a randomized order, ospemifene (at daily doses of 30, 60, or 90 mg) or placebo for 3 months. RESULTS: Although ospemifene caused falls from basal levels in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the only statistically significant difference between ospemifene and placebo was an increase of triglyceride levels (11.3%) in the 90-mg group. Ospemifene caused no significant effect on endothelial markers or homocysteine. Of the markers reflecting coagulation and fibrinolysis, plasma fibrinogen was significantly reduced in the 60- and 90-mg groups of ospemifene (8.7% and 8.5%, respectively) when compared with the placebo group. No changes were seen in generation of thrombin or degradation of crosslinked fibrin D-dimer. The uterine or carotid arteries and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure were not affected by ospemifene. Ospemifene caused no changes in basal insulin or in a 2-h glucose tolerance test, suggesting unaltered insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Neutral effects of short-term use of ospemifene on vascular surrogate markers imply no effect for ospemifene on the risk for cardiovascular disorders in healthy, postmenopausal women.     

Haemodynamic and hormonal effects of short-term oestradiol treatment in postmenopausal women

Haemodynamic changes during a 3-wk treatment with oestradiol valerianate (2 mg/day orally) were studied in 12 postmenopausal women by isotope ¹¹³In^m radiocardiography.

Systolic blood pressure measured in the supine position decreased during oestradiol treatment by 3% (P < 0.05) and the diastolic blood pressure decreased by 4% (P < 0.01). The heart rate decreased by 15% (P < 0.001).

Blood volume increased during oestrogen treatment by 5% (P < 0.05) whereas cardiac output decreased by 9% (P < 0.05). Stroke volume increased by 13% (P < 0.001) due to concomitant decrease in heart rate.

Changes in plasma oestrone and oestradiol concentrations during oestradiol valerianate substitution showed a positive correlation with the changes of blood volume.