Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting

Objectives: We have studied the results of 402 consecutive cases of beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and evaluated the usefulness of gastroepiploic artery (GEA) composite grafts. Methods: Between March 1993 and August 2001, 402 patients underwent beating heart CABG. They were 321 male and 81 female patients, aged 17 to 88 (mean 66) years. Beating heart CABG was facilitated by mechanical stabilization with a doughnut stabilizer, a newly designed sternal retractor and a new coronary perfusion system. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) was performed in 206 patients (the MIDCAB Group), and beating heart CABG with median sternotomy (OPCAB) was performed in 196 patients (the OPCAB Group). Results: Definite off-pump CABG was accomplished in 381 patients. 21 patients (5%) were converted to on-pump beating heart CABG using percutaneous cardiopulmonary system via femoral vessels because of hemodynamic instability. There was 1 operative mortality (0.2%). There was perioperative myocardial infarction in 2 (0.5%), and cerebral infarction in 3 (0.7%). The rate of complete revascularization was 78% in the MIDCAB Group and 97% in the OPCAB Group. The mean number of anastomoses was 1.6 in the MIDCAB Group and 3.3 in the OPCAB Group. The early graft patency was 99.1% in a left internal thoracic artery graft, 97.0% in a right internal thoracic artery graft, 96.5% in GEA, 98.2% in a radial artery graft, and 94.2% in a vein graft. A GEA composite graft was used in 55 of the 168 patients who received GEA grafting. The mean number of anastomoses for the GEA composite graft was 1.6±0.6 per patient. The graft patency rate was 94.6% (53/56) for GEA and 98.6% (72/73) for the radial artery used as a composite graft. Conclusion: A consecutive series of beating heart CABG was performed safely and effectively with a low mortality rate and low morbidity rate. Beating heart CABG could be performed in all patients, and definite off-pump CABG was accomplished in 95% of them. In order to aim for complete revascularization, GEA composite graft was found to be effective since it required a low mean number of 1.6 anastomoses and a satisfactory patency rate at the same time. Read at the Fifty-fourth Annual-Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Panel discussion, Osaka, October 3–5, 2001.     

On/off-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting after thoracoplasty

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB] or on-pump beating CABG (conventional CABG) was performed in 3 post-thoracoplasty patients. Considering their poor respiratory function after thoracoplasty, OPCAB is considered more suitable than conventional CABG with cardio-pulmonary bypass in such cases with severe coronary lesions. However, because the sternum inclines or the pleural cavity may be polluted in these patients, special care is necessary for the operation. In such cases, it may be impossible to bypass to the circumflex artery in OPCAB, and is necessary to consider the use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS), cardio-pulmonary bypass or hybrid therapy before the operation.     

Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome

Objective

Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest is associated with higher mortality and morbidity rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing surgery. Although off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is beneficial for high-risk patients, its efficacy for ACS is unknown, with on-pump beating CABG an adjunctive method. We investigated the effects of OPCAB and on-pump beating CABG for ACS.

Methods

We evaluated 121 consecutive patients with ACS (91 males, 30 females; mean age 69.5 ± 10.3 years) who underwent CABG since 2000. Seventy-five had unstable angina (UA) and 46 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [non-ST elevation (NSTEMI): 22, ST elevation (STEMI): 24]. We assessed CABG for acute coronary syndrome under our primary OPCAB strategy, and compared perioperative status between UA and AMI patients.

Results

(1) Sixty-five (87 %) with UA underwent OPCAB, 8 on-pump beating CABG, and 2 conventional CABG. Conversion from OPCAB was seen in 4 patients. In-hospital mortality was 1.3 %. (2) All UA patients who had intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) underwent OPCAB. No patients with preoperative IABP experienced conversion from OPCAB. (3) In AMI patients, hospital mortality was higher (8.9 %) and the ratios for OPCAB, on-pump beating CABG, and conventional CABG were 39, 57, and 4 %, respectively. Mortality was exclusively seen in patients with STEMI who underwent conventional CABG.

Conclusions

OPCAB might have beneficial effects for ACS patients with UA, while IABP was found essential for completing OPCAB. In AMI patients, on-pump beating CABG might be reasonable for avoiding conversion from OPCAB and ischemic perfusion injury.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures has reached more than 20,000 per year in Japan, and the operative mortality rate has decreased to less than 1.5% including emergent surgery. The mortality and morbidity rates of CABG are still high in patients with risk factors such as cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure on hemodialysis, atheromatous and calcified ascending aorta, and older age when cardiopulmonary bypass is used. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass on a beating heart through a small left lateral anterior thoracotomy, in which the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is used to revascularize the left anterior descending artery, was introduced for high-risk patients with single-vessel disease in the mid-1990s, although is not widely performed at present. Since the late 1990s off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been widely performed as a treatment for multivessel disease through a median sternotomy with the evolution of stabilizers and apical suction devices, refined anesthetic management, and sophisticated surgical techniques. In 2004, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Due to competition from percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with arterial grafts alone was carried out in 52% of total cases and in 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB is becoming the standard CABG in Japan.     

老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的心肌保护作用

目的比较70岁以上老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期心肌损伤程度,探讨OPCAB的心肌保护效果。方法30例老年患者分为两组,A组15例,为CABG组,B组15例,为OPCAB组。分别于术前、术中30min、术中1h、术后6h、12h、24h、72h、120h取静脉血标本,分别测定心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平和CKMB活性;另外记录围手术期各项临床指标。结果OPCAB组术后辅助呼吸时间较CABG组短(P<0.01),而且主动脉球囊反搏和输血例数较低(P<0.05)。CABG组与OPCAB组cTnI、CKMB的术前水平相,术后6hcTnI即有升高而后下降,术后30min至72h均较OPCAB组明显升高(P<0.05或0.01)。结论与CABG相比,OPCAB的心肌损伤较轻,心肌保护效果较好。     

Beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction

We consider that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB], which results in local myocardial ischemia, is more effective for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than conventional CABG under cardiac arrest with global myocardial ischemia. Twenty-one patients (15 males, 6 females) received OPCAB for AMI, among whom surgery was performed following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) failure in 4 and PCI was performed prior to OPCAB in 2, while PCI was not performed in the remaining 15. Preoperatively, 16 patients had intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and 4 had IABP and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). The mean interval from onset to surgery was 11.7 (range 3 to 40) hours. In 20 cases, a complete revascularization was performed. The mean number of bypasses was 2.3 and OPCAB was carried out in 14 patients. In 2 cases, OPCAB was converted to on-pump beating CABG for complete revascularization. Fourteen patients (67%), each maintained with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), were discharged with an elective bypass. Four patients died after on-pump beating CABG, in whom EF was lower than 10%. In addition, 3 died of low cardiac output syndrome (LOS) under PCPS and 1 of ventricular fibrillation. Based on our results, we considered that complete revascularization using OPCAB was effective for cases of AMI with PCI difficulty. However, in shock cases requiring PCPS, cardiac function was not improved even after revascularization. Therefore, it is necessary to study new procedures for shock cases during the period from onset to surgery.     

Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has reached more than 21,000 cases per year in Japan, and the operative mortality has decreased less than 1% including emergent operation. There are 2 trends in CABG. One is the revival and wide spread of off-pump CABG (OPCAB). The other is multiple arterial coronary revascularization. In 2004 and 2005, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. For competition with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with only arterial grafts was carried out in 52% of total cases and 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB with multiple arterial grafts has been becoming the standard CABG in Japan. We reviewed OPCAB and arterial CABG including new technology.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the Zurich experience

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the surgical procedure of choice for treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease. The rising risk profile of the patients requiring isolated CABG and the economic pressure have prompted us to devise new operative strategies to treat these patients. Elimination of the cardiopulmonary bypass is one possible answer to the dilemma of maintaining the quality of care and reducing the exploding costs of our health system. Therefore, we developed the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) for patients requiring isolated CABG. In our experience the key to successful OPCAB relies on the order of revascularization of the myocardial walls (anterior, inferior, lateral), use of intracoronary shunt, no-touch technique for the proximal aortic anastomosis with heart string a (Guidant, IN, USA), close collaboration with the anesthesiologists, early and aggressive administration of anti-platelet therapy, endoscopic vein harvest by perfusionists, and improved body temperature control. Following these concepts, we have been able to offer the OPCAB procedure to over 90% of our patients and to reduce perioperative morbidity and global costs.     

Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians

We evaluate the outcomes of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in high-risk octogenarians. There are 20 cases in 5 years, which contain 1 re-operation case, and 10 emergency cases. Nineteen cases were performed off-pump CABG (OPCAB), and conventional CABG was performed for only 1 case because of unstable hemodynamics with intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP). We generally performed CABG with aorta no-touch technique. There is no death case, and no serious complication like stroke. We used 23 artery and 11 vein grafts for CABG, and mean number of grafts per patient was 1.8+/-0.7. And "hybrid therapy" with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was done for 5 cases. Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after CABG, but we have performed OPCAB for them and have had good results. And we think that aorta no-touch technique, proper selection and use of graft are important.     

Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a more applicable procedure, even in patients with multi-vessel disease. However, the role of OPCAB for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization has not been established yet. We reviewed our results of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with ACS. Seventy-two patients with ACS who underwent emergency CABG were studied. Twenty-five underwent OPCAB and 47 on-pump CABG. OPCAB was mainly indicated for patients who were possibly at risk for cardiopulmonary bypass. When the coronary anatomy was suitable in younger or less risky patients, OPCAB was performed. Patients with multi-vessel disease or with a critical left main trunk lesion were not excluded from OPCAB. The mean number of grafted vessels was 2.6 per patient in the OPCAB group, and 3.8 per patient in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). However, none of the patients in either group required postoperative catheter intervention. Mean operative time was 195 minutes in the OPCAB group and 286 minutes in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). There were three postoperative deaths in the OPCAB group and four in the on-pump group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative cardiogenic shock was the only significant predictor for postoperative death (odds ratio, 7.33). The selection of the on-pump procedure or OPCAB did not correlate with operative death. Thus, we conclude that OPCAB can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients with ACS requiring emergency coronary revascularization.     

Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting

The number of cases of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reached more than 21 000 in Japan in 2002, and the operative mortality decreased to less than 1%, including emergency operations. The annual number of CABGs in Japan declined 17% after 2003 to 18 000 cases in 2005 owing to unrestricted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents. However, CABG is the best treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease based on the comparative data of PCI versus CABG. There have been two trends in CABG during the last decade. One is the widespread use of off-pump (OP) CABG, and the other is multiple coronary artery revascularization. In 2004 and 2005, approximately 60% of all isolated CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. In a study of long-term outcomes comparing PCI with drug-eluting stents versus CABG with only arterial grafts, the latter was carried out in 52% of total cases and in 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB with multiple arterial grafts has become the standard CABG in Japan.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p = 0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p = 0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p = 0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Off-pump coronary artery grafting in patients with left main coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) is considered a relative contraindication to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of OPCAB in these patients compared to an on-pump group (cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB) with LMCD. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2002, 95 patients with left main coronary artery stenosis >50% underwent coronary revascularization. Seventy-three unselected patients underwent OPCAB and 22 underwent revascularization using CPB. The techniques used for OPCAB included the use of deep traction sutures in the posterior pericardium and stabilizers to expose the distal coronary targets. Intraluminal coronary shunts were routinely used during construction of the anastomoses. Variables were analyzed using a Student's paired t-test with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age in the OPCAB group was 59.9 years and the CPB group 61.8 years (p = 0.54). There were 56 males (77%) in the OPCAB and 18 (82%) in the CPB groups. Mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40.3% in OPCAB and 47.3% in CPB (p = 0.015). Average number of grafts was 3.1 in OPCAB and 4.1 in CPB (p = 0.0038). There were no conversions to CPB in those patients initially chosen to undergo OPCAB. There were no early deaths in OPCAB. There was one death in CPB. Mean hospital length of stay was 6.9 days for OPCAB and 9.1 for CPB (p = 0.0159). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LMCD can undergo OPCAB grafting safely and effectively despite reduced LVEF. LMCD should no longer be seen as a contraindication to perform OPCAB grafting.     

70岁以上患者不停跳冠状动脉搭桥术的临床分析

目的　探讨 70岁以上患者冠状动脉外科治疗的术式选择及不停跳搭桥术的安全性。方法　选择我科 1997年 9月至 2 0 0 3年 2月完成的≥ 70岁行不停跳搭桥术治疗患者 6 3例 ,分别与同期同一年龄组行单纯常规搭桥术的 94例患者及同期 <70岁行不停跳搭桥术的 5 8例患者进行比较、分析。结果　在术后正性肌力药物的使用率 (12例、19%与 34例、36 % )、输血率 (47例、75 %与 81例、86 % )、二次开胸率 (0例、0与 4例、4 % )、辅助呼吸时间 [(8± 6 )h与 (16± 12 )h]、院内病死率 (1例、2 %与 4例、4 % )等方面 ,≥ 70岁患者的不停跳搭桥术均优于常规搭桥术 ;≥ 70岁与 <70岁患者不停跳搭桥的术后并发症发生率 (19%与 19% )及院内病死率 (1例、2 %与 1例、2 % )差异无显著意义。结论　与行常规冠状动脉搭桥术的患者相比 ,高龄患者进行不停跳搭桥术有明显的优越性。对高龄患者行不停跳搭桥术 ,安全、临床效果确切     

Is cardiopulmonary bypass a reason for aspirin resistance after coronary artery bypass grafting?

OBJECTIVE: 'Off-pump' coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While midterm results after OPCAB have become available, systematic studies of changes in platelet function after OPCAB are still missing. Since we have previously shown that oral aspirin treatment (100mg) does not achieve sufficient platelet inhibition in the majority of patients operated on with CPB, we hypothesized that bypass surgery without CPB (off-pump coronary artery bypass, OPCAB) causes less impairment of platelet inhibition by aspirin. The aim of this study was to investigate platelet function and the antiplatelet effect of aspirin after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in comparison with conventional on-pump surgery. METHODS: We compared platelet function (in vitro aggregation and thromboxane formation) before and at days 1 and 5 after coronary artery bypass grafting, performed with (n=15) or without (n=14) CPB. Oral aspirin treatment (100mg/d) was started at day 1 after surgery. RESULTS: After a 5 day oral treatment with aspirin, platelet aggregation was inhibited significantly in OPCAB-patients to 55.7+/-16.3% of control before surgery (P<0.05), whereas aggregation remained unchanged after CPB (105.8+/-26.9% of control before surgery; P>0.05). Since aspirin primarily inhibits platelet thromboxane formation, thromoboxane was determined after in vitro aggregation. According to platelet aggregation, thromboxane formation was only inhibited significantly after OPCAB (29.2+/-13.0% of control before surgery, P<0.05), but not after CPB (74.5+/-21.4% of control before surgery, P>0.05). This resistance to aspirin after CPB may be caused by an increased release of new platelets which are competent to form thromboxane, since the number of platelets decreased from 237+/-11x10(3)/microl before CPB to 174+/-13x10(3)/microl at day 1 after surgery and increased significantly the following days reaching 303+/-17x10(3)/microl at day 5. Platelet counts of patients operated on without CPB showed no significant changes (236+/-16x10(3)/microl before OPCAB, 220+/-16x10(3)/microl at day 1 and 266+/-31x10(3)/microl at day 5 after surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The antiplatelet effect of aspirin is largely impaired after CPB, but not after CABG without CPB. Hence, increased platelet turnover after CPB seems to contribute to aspirin resistance, since an increased number of platelets might be competent to form thromboxane within the dosing intervals.     

Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Coronary bypass surgery that provides good long-term graft patency can be performed on the beating heart as a viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: From September 1993 to December 1996, 696 patients underwent CABG on the beating heart at the Ko?uyolu Heart and Research Hospital in Istanbul. Among them, 70 patients were chosen randomly for angiographic assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: The interval from operation to angiography varied from 24 to 61 months (mean, 36.1+/-10.9 months). The patency rate of left internal mammary-left anterior descending artery anastomoses was 95.59% (patency achieved in 65 of 68 patients) and of vein grafts was 47.06% (patency achieved in 16 of 34 patients) (p < 0.0001). The patency rates of grafts anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery were significantly higher than the rates of the grafts anastomosed to the other coronary arteries (95.71% versus 45.45%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that graft type (p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (p = 0.023) were significant predictors for graft occlusion. Left ventricular function improved significantly after CABG (p = 0.04). Reintervention (using percutaneous transluminal cardiac angioplasty) and reoperation rates were 0.97% and 1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting appears to produce midterm and long-term patency rates that are comparable to those of conventional techniques; that is especially true in cases of arterial conduits and of conduits anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure

From January 1995 to May 2003, 36 patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. We performed the operation with cardiopulmonary bypass (group On) in 17 cases and without cardiopulmonary bypass (group Off) in 19 patients [off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) 15, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) 4]. There were no statistical differences regarding mean age, sex, duration of dialysis, preoperative hypertension, diabetes and peripheral and cerebral vascular diseases. Mean operation time and the number of bypass grafts were 315 +/- 53 minutes, 2.8 +/- 0.8 grafts in group On and 284 +/- 78 minutes, 2.4 +/- 1.1 grafts in group Off, respectively (not significant). Seventeen patients (100%) of group On and 12 patients (63%) needed blood transfusion. Hospital stay after operation was significantly longer in group On (40 days) of group Off than that in group Off (26 days). After the operation, continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) was used in 10 cases (59%) in group On and 3 cases (16%) in group Off. In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on dialysis patient, it is very effective to have various operation techniques, such as off-pump bypass and on-pump beating bypass. Also control of water-electrolyte balance using early postoperative CHDF is useful. However, off-pump cases could be controlled by conventional hemodialysis.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: initial experience at one community hospital

BACKGROUND: This study reports one cardiac surgical center's experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and compares clinical risk factors and outcomes with a group of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass at the same institution. METHODS: Data on preoperative risk factors, intraoperative clinical markers, and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures at our institution. From January 1, 1999, through October 7, 1999, 332 patients underwent OPCAB procedures at our institution. This group was compared with 445 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at the same institution during the period of January 1, 1998, through November 30, 1998. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to preoperative clinical risk factors. Intraoperative data showed OPCAB patients tended to have fewer grafts performed and had a lower frequency of multiple grafts to obtuse marginal vessels. Outcomes showed no differences in the incidence of perioperative stroke, mediastinitis, reexploration for bleeding, pulmonary complications, new renal failure, postoperative atrial fibrillation, or transfusion of blood products. Patients in the OPCAB group had fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions and lower incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. A higher percentage of OPCAB patients had surgical lengths of stay of 5 days or less. The OPCAB group tended to have a lower in-hospital mortality rate but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with revascularization of all coronary artery segments is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed with equal or improved outcomes and shorter surgical lengths of stay compared with CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass: MIDCAB and OPCAB

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy (MIDCAB) and coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (OPCAGB) are accepted technique as less invasive than conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We reported our experience with these procedures. From 1996 to December 1999, 176 patients underwent MIDCAB or OPCAB with the internal thoracic artery. The left internal thoracic arteries were used for grafting of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 131 patients, LAD and diagonal branches sequentially in 8 patients, using free radial artery conduits for grafting of the right coronary artery (RAC) or left circumflex (LCx) in 7 patients, using radial artery conduits as Y-graft from LAD for grafting of the RAC or LCx in 24 patients, and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was performed in 4 patients. One patient (0.6%) died in the hospital. One patient (0.6%) had perioperative myocardial infarction. No patient had cerebrovascular accident and sever wood infection. One-hundred-seventy-four patients (98.8%) had resolution of their angina symptom.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison analysis

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using stabilization devices in place of the heart-lung machine is being performed on a wide range of patients. This study retrospectively compared the performance of off-pump coronary artery grafting bypass (OPCAB) with conventional bypass patients over the same 6-month period at The Medical University of South Carolina. Data were collected and compared from the National Cardiac Database of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Parameters studied included age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), previous myocardial infarction (MI), disease severity, number of grafts, complications, blood usage, ventilation times, operating room (OR) time, and hospital length of stay (LOS). There were no significant difference between the patient groups with regard to age, gender, LVEF, previous MI, predicted mortality, and LOS. Operative mortality was also similar in the two groups: conventional bypass 4/117 (3%) and OPCAB 2/86 (2%). The conventional bypass patients (CPB) had significantly (p < 0.05) more diseased vessels (2.9 vs. 2.6) and distal grafts (4.1 vs. 2.7), as compared to the OPCAB group. OPCAB procedures resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean OR time (365 min vs. 406 min) and reduced mean postoperative ventilation hours (3.4 vs. 8.3 hours), as compared to conventional bypass. There were significantly (p < 0.05) fewer blood transfusions in the OPCAB group (1.1 units vs. 2.4 units), and the percentage of patients transfused blood was significantly less (34.9% vs. 57.3%). Nine out of 95 (9.5%) of patients who presented for OPCAB were converted to conventional bypass. Although there may be potential benefits to OPCAB, further studies must be directed at determining those patients who would benefit most from CABG using the off-pump technique.