Evaluation of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice--is it patient-friendly?

A new immunoassay has been developed to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori antigens in stool specimens. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy and utility of the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice. Dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy were studied. H. pylori status was defined before treatment by CLOtest and histology, and by 13C urea breath test (UBT) after eradication therapy. A standard universal container was provided for stool collection and the HpSA test was performed by an investigator blind to the results of the other diagnostic tests. Patients also provided a venous blood sample prior to endoscopy for H. pylori serology. Sixty patients (30 M : 30 F: mean age 47 yr) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 93%, 94%, 96%, and 90%. Twenty five patients returned for post treatment 13CUBT, but only 14 (56%) provided a stool sample for analysis. The post treatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 67%, 100%, 67%, and 92%. The HpSA test was negative in 19% of the patients found positive for anti-H. pylori antibodies on serology testing. All H. pylori antibody-negative patients had a negative HpSA test. Our results suggest that the HpSA test provides accurate pretreatment diagnosis of H. pylori infection but the reliability of the test after treatment is uncertain. A potential problem with the HpSA test appears to be patient reluctance about stool handling and this could prove a significant obstacle to patient compliance and the acceptability of the test in everyday clinical practice.     

Non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection can be diagnosed by invasive techniques requiring endoscopy and biopsy (histologic examination, culture, polymerase chain reaction), and non-invasive techniques (serology, urea breath test, urine or blood, detection of H. pylori antigen in stool specimen). However, recent studies have demonstrated that a strategy of 'testing and treating' for H. pylori in uninvestigated, young (<50 years), dyspeptic patients in primary care is safe and reduces the need for endoscopy. Indeed, a number of clinical guidelines recommend non-invasive testing in dyspeptic patients followed by treatment of H. pylori in primary care based on clinical and economic analyses. Several non-invasive tests are currently available on the market. The choice depends on the clinical circumstances, the likelihood ratio of positive and negative tests, the cost-effectiveness of the testing strategy, and, finally, the availability of the tests. Nevertheless, two non-invasive tests are commonly used: the urea breath test, and the stool antigen test.     

Which test is best for Helicobacter pylori? A cost-effectiveness model using decision analysis

GPs face a potential dilemma in deciding which test to use for detection of Helicobacter pylori. For patients with dyspepsia, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) advises primary care practitioners to adopt a 'test and treat' policy before considering a referral for gastroscopy. There are many ways of testing: serology, urea breath test, and faecal antigen test. NICE does not advocate any preferred single test for detecting H. pylori. In the current study a multi-stakeholder 2-day workshop was established to agree and populate a cost-effectiveness decision analysis model. The aim was to analyse the three types of tests available for H. pylori and to determine which is the most practical and cost effective. Agreement on the costs and diagnostic values to be entered into the decision-analytic model was achieved. Results indicate that the faecal antigen test was the most effective in terms of true outcomes and cost. One thousand virtual patients were allocated to each of the three tests. Serology had 903, urea breath test had 961, and the faecal antigen test had 968 true positive outcomes. Data indicate that the faecal antigen test is the preferable strategy for diagnosis of H. pylori in primary care. This has implications for implementing new testing processes and for commissioning new diagnostic pathways for use in primary care.     

Estimation of prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in an asymptomatic elderly population comparing [14C] urea breath test and serology.

A non-invasive serological assay devised in this laboratory had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% as determined by culture and confirmed by histology in a group of 47 patients who had undergone endoscopy. The correlation between serology and the non-invasive [14C] breath test was very good. Only one of 24 culture positive patients was, while all 23 culture negative patients were, breath test negative. In a group of 46 healthy elderly persons, however, significant anomalies between serology and breath test were observed. Only 83% of the breath test negative persons were seronegative, while only 68% of the breath test positive persons were seropositive. These results can be explained in terms of age related atrophic gastritis and immune incompetence, causing reduced colonisation and decreased antibody production, respectively. These investigations suggest that non-invasive tests for H pylori infection may not be reliable in the elderly.     

Helicobacter pylori test and medical reimbursement

There are an estimated 60 million people with Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection who occupied 50% of the population of Japan. In Japanese medical reimbursement H. pylori tests were introduced on November 1, 2000 and they are able to use only to patients with gastric and duodenal ulcer. H. pylori tests were composed of rapid urease test, urea breath test, antibody test, bacterial culture and pathologic test. Payment of each test is 700 Yen. Classification and cost of H. pylori tests are shown. Usage of laboratory tests for H. pylori infection is mentioned. Those particular tests are useful to decrease the number of gastric and duodenal ulcer in Japan.     

Minitek urea disk test, a sensitive and cost-effective method to screen for Campylobacter pylori in gastric biopsies.

One hundred fifty-five biopsy specimens from the gastric mucosa of 81 patients undergoing routine endoscopy procedures were tested for the presence of Campylobacter pylori by three methods: Gram stain, culture, and modified Minitek, a rapid urea disk test (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.). Twenty-nine patients were infected with C. pylori. Sensitivities and specificities of detection were 100 and 94% with the Minitek test and 93 and 100% with Gram stain, respectively. Rapid testing by the urea disk is a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method for detecting the presence of C. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in clinical situations

Helicobacter pylori is prevalent worldwide, especially in developing countries, and is associated with several upper gastrointestinal diseases. Since it is present in over 90% of duodenal ulcer patients, empirical eradication in these patients is often recommended. In gastric ulcer patients, eradication is indicated only after the infection is confirmed. Testing for H. pylori infection should be carried out in patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage, because eradication has been shown to reduce recurrent bleeding. Both H. pylori and NSAIDs are risk factors for peptic ulceration, and it is reasonable to screen for and eradicate H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer patients taking NSAIDs. H. pylori is a group I carcinogen for gastric adenocarcinoma, and should be eradicated for the primary prevention of this cancer. Eradication of this organism has been reported to result in regression of early low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. The role of H. pylori infection in the causation of gastroesophageal reflux and non-ulcer dyspepsia is not clearly established. Several tests are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. These include invasive tests, such as histology, culture and urease test, and non-invasive tests, such as serology, urea breath test and stool antigen test. The choice of test is determined by clinical indication, pretest probability of infection, as well as the availability, cost, sensitivity and specificity of the test. H. pylori eradication therapy using proton pump inhibitor with clarithromycin and amoxycillin for 7 days has a success rate of 85-90%. Improved living standard and sanitation are vital in the control of H. pylori transmission and infection. Future development may include the use of vaccines against H. pylori, and therapies specifically targeting cagA strains of the bacteria.     

Two enzyme immunoassays and PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens from pediatric patients before and after eradication therapy

This study of pediatric patients was intended to determine the suitability of stool PCR and two antigen enzyme immunoassays (EIAs; Premier Platinum HpSA and the novel FemtoLab H. pylori), which detect Helicobacter pylori antigens in feces, as pretreatment diagnostic tools and especially as posttreatment control. Forty-nine H. pylori-infected children with dyspepsia received eradication therapy. Successful treatment was determined by a negative [(13)C]urea breath test 4 and 12 weeks after discontinuation of therapy. Fecal specimens were collected prior to eradication therapy as well as 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Successfully treated children delivered stool samples at 6, 8, and 12 weeks posttreatment also. Specimens were examined by seminested PCR and Premier Platinum HpSA and were reexamined by both EIAs as soon as FemtoLab H. pylori was available. In the first test series, the overall sensitivities of PCR and Premier Platinum HpSA were 93.0 and 91.1%, respectively. With specimens collected at 4 weeks after treatment, the respective specificities were 68.8 and 79.3%. After longer follow-up periods, however, they gradually increased to 100 and 96.9%, respectively. In the new test series, Premier Platinum HpSA delivered a considerably lower number of false-positive results (4 versus 18), indicating intertest variations. The overall test sensitivity was 94.6%, and the overall specificity was 97.5%. FemtoLab H. pylori showed an excellent performance with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.2 and 98.1%, respectively. Thus, in contrast to PCR, both EIAs were shown to be suitable for early posttreatment control.     

Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step immunochromatographic assay for detection of monoclonal Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children

A new rapid one-step immunochromatographic test using monoclonal antibodies for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool in children was evaluated on coded stool samples from 159 children (mean age, 9.7 +/- 5.0 years; 118 from Munich, 41 from Vienna): 86 children were H. pylori infected defined by positive culture and/or > or =2 other positive tests ([13C]urea breath test, histology, rapid urease test), and 73 children showed concordant negative results. Seventy-nine patients (12.1 +/- 3.8 years; 42 from Munich; 37 from Vienna) were tested 6 to 8 weeks after anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy with urea breath test and stool test. In Munich, all 160 tests (118 pre- and 42 posttreatment) were independently read by two observers. Equivocal results were excluded for calculation of sensitivity and specificity but were considered as false to assess accuracy. The two observers in Munich agreed in 63 out of 65 positive and 89 out of 95 negative results, while eight times (5.0%) they judged the test as equivocal. Pretreatment and posttreatment results for sensitivity were 88.1% (79.2 to 94.1) and 88.9% (51.8 to 99.7), specificity 88.1% (77.8 to 94.1) and 93.9% (85.2 to 98.3), and accuracy 83.5% and 81.5%, respectively. We conclude that the new monoclonal immunochromatographic quick test shows a good interobserver agreement, but equivocal results occur in 5%. Performance is comparable before and after therapy. The test may become a good alternative in children in settings where a [13C]urea breath test or a reliable enzyme immunoassay stool test are not available.     

Detection of Helicobacter pylori Antibodies in a Pediatric Population: Comparison of Three Commercially Available Serological Tests and One In-House Enzyme Immunoassay

A serum immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for Helicobacter pylori antibodies already in use in adults was evaluated with 99 pediatric serum samples to determine its usefulness for the study of H. pylori disease in children. The reference method used was either the (13)C-urea breath test or a biopsy culture of gastric mucosa. In children, an EIA cutoff of 0.35 absorbancy unit yielded sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 93, 97, 93, and 97%, respectively. The cutoff recommended when this EIA was published for use in adults was 0.70 absorbancy unit (H. Gnarpe, P. Unge, C. Blomqvist, and S. M?kitalo, APMIS 96:128-132, 1988). Another subset of 169 serum samples taken from children was analyzed by four serological tests in order to compare the performance of the in-house EIA with the Pyloriset, HM-CAP, and Helico-G kits. For the 169 samples, 10 (5.9%) false-positives and no false-negatives occurred with the Helico-G, 3 (1.8%) false-positives and no false-negatives occurred with the Pyloriset, and 3 (1.8%) false-positives and 1 (0.6%) false-negative occurred with the HM-CAP. For the 169 samples, 1 (0.6%) false-positive and no false-negatives occurred with the in-house EIA. Serological detection of H. pylori antibodies with our EIA seems to be valuable in diagnosing H. pylori infection in children, but only if a lowered, specific pediatric cutoff is established. The commercial kits, particularly the Helico-G, seem to overdiagnose pediatric H. pylori infection. A positive serological test for H. pylori infection, particularly for children, needs to be confirmed by a reference method because of the possibility of spontaneous eradication of infection, with a lingering serological response.     

Posttreatment follow-up of Helicobacter pylori infection using a stool antigen immunoassay.

The Helicobacter pylori stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (HpSA) was evaluated during posttreatment follow-up of patients in a country with a very high prevalence of H. pylori infection. From among 273 dyspeptic individuals (18 to 55 years) initially recruited from a shantytown in Lima, Peru, 238 participants who met the inclusion criteria and were suspected to be H. pylori positive based on (14)C urea breath test (UBT) results underwent endoscopy. Participants with endoscopy-proven infections received standard eradication therapy and were monitored by UBT and HpSA at 1 month following treatment and at 3-month intervals for 9 months posttreatment. A second endoscopy was performed if UBT results showed evidence of treatment failure or H. pylori recurrence. Biopsy results were considered the "gold standard" in all analyses. Among patients who underwent endoscopy, HpSA had a pretreatment sensitivity of 93%. Two-hundred thirty patients completed the treatment regimen, of whom 201 (93%) were considered to have had successful treatment outcomes based on a negative follow-up UBT. Thirty-two patients with UBT-defined treatment failures or H. pylori recurrences at any point during the 9-month follow-up underwent a second endoscopy. In the posttreatment setting, HpSA had an overall sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 67%. Agreement between UBT and HpSA diminished throughout the follow-up. Among 14 participants in whom HpSA remained positive at 1 month following treatment despite UBT evidence of treatment success, 12 (86%) became HpSA negative within 3 months posttreatment. Although this study confirmed the validity of the HpSA in the initial assessment of dyspeptic patients, the test demonstrated a reduced overall accuracy in the detection of treatment failures and H. pylori recurrences during 9 months of posttreatment follow-up. Furthermore, in some patients it may take up to 3 months after successful eradication for antigen shedding to diminish to levels within the negative HpSA range.     

Evaluation of [13C]urea breath test and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children from a developing country

The [(13)C]urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) and Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSA) for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children were validated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 93.8, 99.1, 97.8, and 98.0%, respectively, for the (13)C-UBT and 96.9, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for HpSA. Both tests are appropriate for diagnosing H. pylori infection in children.     

Evaluation of eight enzyme immunoassays for detection of immunoglobulin G against Helicobacter pylori.

Eight commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to test sera taken from 102 patients in whom Helicobacter pylori infection status had been determined by means of biopsy culture, PCR, histology, and urease production and by 13C urea breath test. By those means, 61 patients had been found to be infected. Assays were compared by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivities ranged from 86 to 98%; specificities ranged from 83 to 98%. In a group consisting of the assays by Bio-Whittaker, Meddens Biotech, Orion (Pyloriset EIA G, new version), and Enteric Products, Inc. (HM Cap), differences in performance were not statistically significant. Sensitivities in this group ranged from 93 to 98%; specificities ranged from 95 to 98%. Assays from this group may be useful in addition to biopsy-based methods in diagnosing H. pylori infection.     

Histological identification of Helicobacter pylori: comparison of staining methods

AIM: To determine whether two recently described staining methods (the modified McMullen's and the Helicobacter pylori silver stain HpSS methods) used for the histological identification of H pylori organisms are superior to two established techniques (the modified Giemsa and anti-H pylori antibody immunostain) in terms of availability, reproducibility, rapidity, sensitivity, and cost. METHODS: Histological sections from 63 paired gastric biopsies from adult patients previously investigated for dyspepsia were stained with the four methods and these were assessed blindly and independently by two observers. Of the 63 patients, 30 were originally negative in all tests for H pylori infection, 30 were positive, and the remaining three cases had discordant results using a combination of five tests (rapid biopsy urease test, urea breath test, culture, serology, and histology). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was best with the antibody method (98%), followed by the McMullen's (90%), Giemsa (87%), and HpSS (85%). Of the 60 "gold standard" positive and negative cases, 30 were positive by the modified Giemsa stain, 29 by the McMullen's method, 29 by HpSS, and 30 by the antibody stain. However, there were two false positives with the HpSS method. The modified Giemsa is the cheapest and easiest to perform technically. CONCLUSIONS: When H pylori are present, careful examination will almost always reveal them, whichever of these stains is used. However, the modified Giemsa stain is the method of choice because it is sensitive, cheap, easy to perform, and reproducible.     

Evaluation of the novel Helicobacter pylori ClariRes real-time PCR assay for detection and clarithromycin susceptibility testing of H. pylori in stool specimens from symptomatic children

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Helicobacter pylori ClariRes assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) for the detection of H. pylori infection and the simultaneous clarithromycin susceptibility testing of the H. pylori isolates in stool samples from 100 symptomatic children. The results obtained by this novel biprobe real-time PCR method were directly compared with the results obtained from histological examination of gastric biopsy specimens, culturing, the [13C]urea breath test, and a monoclonal antibody-based stool antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Fecal specimens from all 54 children who were shown to be noninfected by "gold standard" tests gave true-negative PCR results (specificity, 100%). Of the remaining 46 individuals with a positive H. pylori status, 29 were found to be positive by real-time PCR (sensitivity, 63%). For these 29 cases, the H. pylori ClariRes assay confirmed all results from phenotypic clarithromycin susceptibility testing by Etest. In summary, this investigation demonstrates that detection of Helicobacter DNA in stool samples by real-time PCR is a difficult task and that this method cannot replace the stool antigen EIA (sensitivity, 95.7%) for the accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children.     

江苏宿迁地区Hp感染及粪便基因检测克拉霉素耐药现状

目的 了解江苏宿迁地区幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染及对克拉霉素的耐药情况。方法 收集2016年10月~2017年10月在宿迁市第一人民医院行14C呼气试验检查的健康体检者的Hp检查结果,随机留取412例受检者的个人资料,并随机留取146例Hp感染者的粪便标本行粪便基因克拉霉素药敏试验,统计Hp感染率,比较相关因素对Hp感染的影响,初步了解Hp克拉霉素耐药情况。结果 共2919例纳入研究,1248例Hp阳性（42.75%）,男性人群的Hp感染率为44.89%,高于女性的39.89%（P＜0.05）,20岁以     

Comparison of three stool antigen tests for Helicobacter pylori detection

BACKGROUND: Active Helicobacter pylori infection can be diagnosed by invasive (biopsy based) or non-invasive methods, such as stool antigen testing. AIMS: To compare three stool antigen enzyme immunoassay kits--Premier Platinum Hp SA, FemtoLab Cnx, and Hp Ag--with biopsy based methods for the detection of H pylori in previously undiagnosed patients. METHODS: One hundred and eleven adults with dyspepsia referred for endoscopy provided a stool sample for testing and had biopsies taken. Patients were considered H pylori positive if two out of three invasive tests were positive or if culture alone was positive. RESULTS: The sensitivities and specificities of the Premier Platinum Hp SA, FemtoLab Cnx, and Hp Ag stool antigen kits when compared with biopsy based diagnosis were, 63.6%, 88.0%, and 56.0% and 92.6%, 97.6%, and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FemtoLab Cnx may be considered as an alternative to urea breath testing in the initial diagnosis of patients with dyspepsia who do not require immediate endoscopy. Stool testing has the potential advantages of being simple to perform, relatively cheap, and samples can be submitted directly from primary care.     

Histology compared with chemical testing for urease for rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens.

Gastric biopsy specimens from 283 patients with ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia attending five gastroenterology clinics in the northern region of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were tested by the agar gel test (n = 115) or the ultra-rapid endoscopy room test (n = 168) for the presence of Helicobacter pylori urease. Results were compared with a histological technique using the Romanowsky type (Diff-3) stain for detecting H pylori in both antral and body type gastric mucosa. A sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100% using the agar gel test compared with 87% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity for the ultra-rapid endoscopy room test. Grading of H pylori in gastric biopsy specimens showed that the higher the histological grade, the more likely that the urease test would be positive. Both forms of urease tests have high specificity for detecting H pylori in gastric biopsy specimens, although the urea agar test has a higher sensitivity than the ultra-rapid test. Low numbers of H pylori in gastric biopsy specimens are the most important determinant of a false negative urease test.     

Role of ELISA in H. pylori detection and its correlation with urease test

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common chronic bacterial infection in humans linked to acid peptic diseases, gastric carcinomas and lymphomas. The bacilli produces large amounts of urease and this property has formed the basis of detection of H. pylori by the Christensen's urease test. Where endoscopy is not clinically indicated, serology may be used to establish the diagnosis. This study was undertaken to diagnose H. pylori with the help of Christensen's urease test on endoscopic biopsy specimens & correlated with the detection in Sera, of IgG antibodies against H. pylori, by ELISA technique. The study was conducted on 100 patients suffering from acid peptic disorders out of which 40 (40%) tested positive for H. pylori both by urease and serology. Christensen's urease and ELISA were found to have sensitivities of 85.7% & 90.9% and specificities of 96% and 87.5% respectively. Christensen's urease was taken as a standard method of diagnosis and its correlation with ELISA worked out to (+1) which meant there was a strong positive association between both the tests. Hence either test could be used for primary diagnosis of H. pylori instead of histopathological study and/or culture of H. pylori.     

Evaluation of two commercial enzyme immunoassays, testing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses, for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

Serological testing to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in children is still controversial, although commonly used in clinical practice. We compared the immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA results of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Pyloriset IgG and IgA and Enzygnost II IgG and IgA) for 175 children with abdominal symptoms divided into three age groups (0 to < or =6 years, n = 47; >6 to < or =12 years, n = 77; >12 years, n = 51). A child was considered H. pylori infected if at least two of three tests (histology, rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test) or culture were positive and noninfected if all results were concordantly negative. Of 175 children, 93 (53%) were H. pylori negative and 82 were H. pylori positive. With the recommended cutoff values, the overall specificity was excellent for all four EIAs (95.7 to 97.8%) regardless of age. Sensitivity varied markedly between tests and was 92.7, 70.7, 47.5, and 24.4% for Enzygnost II IgG, Pyloriset IgG, Enzygnost II IgA, and Pyloriset IgA, respectively. Sensitivity was low in the youngest age group (25 to 33.3%), except for Enzygnost II IgG (91.6%). Receiver-operating curve analyses revealed that lower cutoff values would improve the accuracy of all of the tests except Enzygnost II IgG. Measurement of specific IgA, in addition to IgG, antibodies hardly improved the sensitivity. The specificity of commercial serological tests is high in children when the cutoff values obtained from adults are used. In contrast, sensitivity is variable, with a strong age dependence in some, but not all, tests. We speculate that young children may have a different immune response to H. pylori, with preferable responses to certain antigens, as well as lower titers than adults. The Pyloriset test may fail to recognize these specific antibodies.