脑深部电刺激猴帕金森病模型的建立

目的通过猴偏侧帕金森病（Parkinson disease,PD）模型丘脑底核（subthalamic nucleus,STN）脑深部电刺激（deep brain stimulation,DBS）系统的植入,对脑深部电刺激动物模型的制备进行了探讨.方法2只猴偏侧PD模型,按照猴脑立体定向图谱,在右侧STN植入脑深部刺激电极,并同期皮下植入脉冲发生器.术后行头颅X线平片和MRI检查,给予慢性高频电刺激,观察运动症状改善.结果2只偏侧猴PD模型成功的同期植入DBS系统,术后的症状观察和阿朴吗啡（apomorphine,APO）诱发旋转实验,证实STN慢性高频电刺激有效地缓解了猴PD样症状.结论通过立体定向技术同期将DBS系统植入动物体内,可以有效的建立DBS动物模型,为DBS在神经疾病的应用研究提供了良好的实验模型.     

Speed effects of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) accelerates reaction time (RT) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), particularly in tasks in which decisions on the response side have to be made. This might indicate that DBS speeds up both motor and nonmotor operations. Therefore, we studied the extent to which modifications of different processing streams could explain changes of RT under subthalamic DBS. Ten PD patients on‐DBS and off‐DBS and 10 healthy subjects performed a choice‐response task (CRT), requiring either right or left finger button presses. At the same time, EEG recordings were performed, so that RTs could be assessed together with lateralized readiness potentials (LRP), indicative of movement preparation. Additionally, an oddball task (OT) was run, in which right finger responses to target stimuli were recorded along with cognitive P300 responses. Generally, PD patients off‐DBS had longer RTs than controls. Subthalamic DBS accelerated RT only in CRT. This could largely be explained by analog shortenings of LRP. No DBS‐dependent changes were identified in OT, neither on the level of RT nor on the level of P300 latencies. It follows that RT accelerations under DBS of the STN are predominantly due to effects on the timing of motor instead of nonmotor processes. This starting point explains why DBS gains of response speed are low in tasks in which reactions are initiated from an advanced level of movement preparation (as in OT), and high whenever motor responses have to be raised from scratch (as in CRT). © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Thalamic deep brain stimulation: effects on the nontarget limbs.

Unilateral thalamic ventral intermediate (VIM) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now accepted as an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET) and tremor related to Parkinson's disease (PD). The effects of unilateral placement on the side ipsilateral to the surgical site have not been carefully evaluated. To systematically assess the effects ipsilateral to the surgical side and to determine the effects of device inactivation on the baseline tremor, we evaluated tremor in 73 patients approximately 3 months after their unilateral thalamic placement. Assessment included blinded and unblinded ratings using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for PD patients and a modified Tremor Rating Scale in ET patients. All measures of tremor contralateral to the implantation site improved significantly and robustly in both PD and ET. Implantation did not worsen tremor by any measure on the ipsilateral side. There was mild ipsilateral improvement as measured by lower observed tremor scores in ET (6.0 +/- 1.8 to 5.0 +/- 1.9, P < 0.005), but not PD. There was no rebound augmentation of tremor in either hand after the devices were deactivated in either group. We conclude that VIM DBS may mildly improve ipsilateral ET, and that concerns about meaningful ipsilateral tremor augmentation after device deactivation are not warranted.     

Psychiatric side effects of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Since the 1990 s deep brain stimulation (DBS) has provided an effective tool for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. About fifty thousand Parkinson patients have been treated by DBS so far. Although a relatively safe intervention, there are still some considerable side effects, psychiatric and non-psychiatric. We conducted a structured search using PubMed and included publications from 1999 to February 2011 to provide an overview of the current data concerning psychiatric side effects of DBS in Parkinson's disease. There was a tremendous variety and inconsistency concerning methods and results of the studies we included. However, it became apparent that postoperatively increased attention should be paid concerning a potentially increased suicidality and affective alterations (particularly manic states). We suggest frequent pre- and postoperative evaluations of Parkinson patients treated with DBS.     

Behavioral effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease

To date, few studies have utilized standardized measures to assess the neurobehavioral changes that can accompany deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nuclei (STN) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), yet behavioral changes are the most debated among practitioners. We evaluated behavior with the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe), which includes a large-scale normative sample for self- and collateral ratings and is particularly relevant to PD with subscales assessing Apathy, Disinhibition, and Executive Dysfunction. Data were collected from 16 (11 males) PD patients. All FrSBe subscale scores increased significantly when retrospective preoperative scores and current (postoperative) scores were compared. Self- and collateral FrSBe ratings were not significantly correlated with each other, though for both scores at least half of the group met criteria for a clinically significant level of symptoms postoperatively. No significant correlations were seen for collateral current FrSBE ratings with cognitive or motor variables. Higher self-ratings of behavior characteristic of apathy were related to higher self-ratings of depressive symptoms, and to a smaller decrease in antiparkinsonian medications following surgery. We propose that the standardized assessment of behavioral aspects of executive dysfunction adds information that is largely dissociable from the motor and cognitive assessment of function in PD patients undergoing STN DBS. In future, prospective standardized measurement of behavior may allow for better prediction of which patients will experience significant behavioral issues postoperatively.     

Characterizing the effects of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography: A review

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an important form of neuromodulation that is being applied to patients with motor, mood, or cognitive circuit disorders. Despite the efficacy and widespread use of DBS, the precise mechanisms by which it works remain unknown. Over the last decade, magnetoencephalography (MEG) has become an important functional neuroimaging technique used to study DBS.

Vascular changes caused by deep brain stimulation using double-dose gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 32 patients with medically intractable idiopathic Parkinson＇s disease who had undergone staged bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subtha-lamic nuclei from January 2007 to May 2011. The vascularture of the patients who received two deep brain stimulations was detected using double-dose gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI. The dimensions of straight sinus, superior sagittal sinus, ipsilateral internal cerebral vein in the tha- lamic branch and ipsilateral anterior caudate vein were reduced. These findings demonstrate that bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nuclei affects cerebral venous blood flow.     

Endovascular deep brain stimulation: Investigating the relationship between vascular structures and deep brain stimulation targets

BackgroundEndovascular delivery of current using ‘stentrodes’ – electrode bearing stents – constitutes a potential alternative to conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS). The precise neuroanatomical relationships between DBS targets and the vascular system, however, are poorly characterized to date.ObjectiveTo establish the relationships between cerebrovascular system and DBS targets and investigate the feasibility of endovascular stimulation as an alternative to DBS.MethodsNeuroanatomical targets as employed during deep brain stimulation (anterior limb of the internal capsule, dentatorubrothalamic tract, fornix, globus pallidus pars interna, medial forebrain bundle, nucleus accumbens, pedunculopontine nucleus, subcallosal cingulate cortex, subthalamic nucleus, and ventral intermediate nucleus) were superimposed onto probabilistic vascular atlases obtained from 42 healthy individuals. Euclidian distances between targets and associated vessels were measured. To determine the electrical currents necessary to encapsulate the predefined neurosurgical targets and identify potentially side-effect inducing substrates, a preliminary volume of tissue activated (VTA) analysis was performed.ResultsSix out of ten DBS targets were deemed suitable for endovascular stimulation: medial forebrain bundle (vascular site: P1 segment of posterior cerebral artery), nucleus accumbens (vascular site: A1 segment of anterior cerebral artery), dentatorubrothalamic tract (vascular site: s2 segment of superior cerebellar artery), fornix (vascular site: internal cerebral vein), pedunculopontine nucleus (vascular site: lateral mesencephalic vein), and subcallosal cingulate cortex (vascular site: A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery). While VTAs effectively encapsulated mfb and NA at current thresholds of 3.5 V and 4.5 V respectively, incremental amplitude increases were required to effectively cover fornix, PPN and SCC target (mean voltage: 8.2 ± 4.8 V, range: 3.0–17.0 V). The side-effect profile associated with endovascular stimulation seems to be comparable to conventional lead implantation. Tailoring of targets towards vascular sites, however, may allow to reduce adverse effects, while maintaining the efficacy of neural entrainment within the target tissue.ConclusionsWhile several challenges remain at present, endovascular stimulation of select DBS targets seems feasible offering novel and exciting opportunities in the neuromodulation armamentarium.     

Switching off micturition using deep brain stimulation at midbrain sites

Most of the time the bladder is locked in storage mode, switching to voiding only when it is judged safe and/or socially appropriate to urinate. Here we show, in humans and rodents, that deep brain stimulation in the periaqueductal gray matter can rapidly and reversibly manipulate switching within the micturition control circuitry, to defer voiding and maintain urinary continence, even when the bladder is full. Manipulation of neural continence pathways by deep brain stimulation may offer new avenues for the treatment of urinary incontinence of central origin.     

Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical impedance measurements for deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in human patients are normally in the range 500-1500 Omega. DBS devices utilize voltage-controlled stimulation; therefore, the current delivered to the tissue is inversely proportional to the impedance. The goals of this study were to evaluate the effects of various electrical properties of the tissue medium and electrode-tissue interface on the impedance and to determine the impact of clinically relevant impedance variability on the volume of tissue activated (VTA) during DBS. METHODS: Axisymmetric finite-element models (FEM) of the DBS system were constructed with explicit representation of encapsulation layers around the electrode and implanted pulse generator. Impedance was calculated by dividing the stimulation voltage by the integrated current density along the active electrode contact. The models utilized a Fourier FEM solver that accounted for the capacitive components of the electrode-tissue interface during voltage-controlled stimulation. The resulting time- and space-dependent voltage waveforms generated in the tissue medium were superimposed onto cable model axons to calculate the VTA. RESULTS: The primary determinants of electrode impedance were the thickness and conductivity of the encapsulation layer around the electrode contact and the conductivity of the bulk tissue medium. The difference in the VTA between our low (790 Omega) and high (1244 Omega) impedance models with typical DBS settings (-3 V, 90 mus, 130 Hz pulse train) was 121 mm3, representing a 52% volume reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Electrode impedance has a substantial effect on the VTA and accurate representation of electrode impedance should be an explicit component of computational models of voltage-controlled DBS. SIGNIFICANCE: Impedance is often used to identify broken leads (for values > 2000 Omega) or short circuits in the hardware (for values < 50 Omega); however, clinical impedance values also represent an important parameter in defining the spread of stimulation during DBS.     

The effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on parkinsonian tremor

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus has been the target of choice for patients with disabling essential tremor or medication refractory parkinsonian tremor. Recently there is evidence that the subthalamic nucleus (STN) should be the targets for patients with tremor associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). To assess the effects of STN DBS on parkinsonian tremor, eight consecutive patients with PD and disabling tremor were videotaped using a standardized tremor protocol. Evaluations were performed at least 12 h after last dose of medication with the DBS turned off followed by optimal DBS on state. A rater blinded to DBS status evaluated randomized video segments with the tremor components of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). Compared with DBS off state there were significant improvements in mean UPDRS tremor score 79.4% (p = 0.008), total TRS score 69.9% (p = 0.008) and upper extremity 92.5% (p = 0.008) TRS subscore. Functional improvement was noted with pouring liquids. Our findings provide support that STN DBS is an effective treatment of tremor associated with PD.     

Chronic implantation of deep brain stimulation leads in animal models of neurological disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has routinely been used as a treatment option in Parkinson's disease (PD), tremor disorders and, more recently, dystonia. Here, we describe a method of implantation of DBS leads in the monkey model of PD. By adapting procedures used in human patients, we have devised implantation techniques that can be readily applied to any animal model in which stimulation of subcortical structures is desired. The procedure for implantation consists of microelectrode mapping of the target structure, DBS lead preparation and implantation, and verification of lead placement. The stimulation system described in this paper allows for simultaneous recording of neuronal activity (during stimulation) and observation of animal behavior without restriction of the subject's head or body. In addition, we detail techniques for stimulation and recording from distant structures (utilizing either a one or two chamber system) to facilitate examination of the effects of DBS on neural activity. Thus, the correlation of changes in neuronal activity with behavior during stimulation of subcortical structures can be accomplished. In addition, the use of leads in primates which are analogous in size to human devices allows for close reproduction of the effects of stimulation as observed in humans.     

Update on deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for movement disorders and an investigational treatment in other neurologic conditions and in neuropsychiatry. DBS can target with precision neuroanatomical targets deep within the brain that are proposed, on the basis of increasing evidence from functional neuroimaging and other methods, to be centrally involved in the pathophysiology of some neuropsychiatric illnesses. DBS is nonablative, offering the advantages of reversibility and adjustability. In theory, this characteristic might permit therapeutic effectiveness to be enhanced or side effects to be minimized. Although its mechanisms of action are unknown, several possible effects have been proposed to underlie the therapeutic effects of DBS in movement disorders, and potentially in other conditions as well. This issue is the subject of very active investigation in a number of clinical and preclinical laboratories. DBS may offer a degree of hope for patients with intractable neuropsychiatric illness. Research intended to realize this potential will require a very considerable commitment of resources, energy, and time across disciplines including psychiatry, neurosurgery, neurology, neuropsychology, and bioethics. Investigations in this area should proceed cautiously.     

Studies of the neural mechanisms of deep brain stimulation in rodent models of Parkinson's disease

Several rodent models of deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been developed in recent years. Electrophysiological and neurochemical studies have been performed to examine the mechanisms underlying the effects of DBS. In vitro studies have provided deep insights into the role of ion channels in response to brain stimulation. In vivo studies reveal neural responses in the context of intact neural circuits. Most importantly, recording of neural responses to behaviorally effective DBS in freely moving animals provides a direct means for examining how DBS modulates the basal ganglia thalamocortical circuits and thereby improves motor function. DBS can modulate firing rate, normalize irregular burst firing patterns and reduce low-frequency oscillations associated with the Parkinsonian state. Our current efforts are focused on elucidating the mechanisms by which DBS effects on neural circuitry improve motor performance. New behavioral models and improved recording techniques will aide researchers conducting future DBS studies in a variety of behavioral modalities and enable new treatment strategies to be explored, such as closed-loop stimulations based on real-time computation of ensemble neural activity.     

Studies of the neural mechanisms of deep brain stimulation in rodent models of Parkinson's disease

Several rodent models of deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been developed in recent years. Electrophysiological and neurochemical studies have been performed to examine the mechanisms underlying the effects of DBS. In vitro studies have provided deep insights into the role of ion channels in response to brain stimulation. In vivo studies reveal neural responses in the context of intact neural circuits. Most importantly, recording of neural responses to behaviorally effective DBS in freely moving animals provides a direct means for examining how DBS modulates the basal ganglia thalamocortical circuits and thereby improves motor function. DBS can modulate firing rate, normalize irregular burst firing patterns and reduce low frequency oscillations associated with the Parkinsonian state. Our current efforts are focused on elucidating the mechanisms by which DBS effects on neural circuitry improve motor performance. New behavioral models and improved recording techniques will aide researchers conducting future DBS studies in a variety of behavioral modalities and enable new treatment strategies to be explored, such as closed-loop stimulations based on real time computation of ensemble neural activity.     

Investigating the depth electrode–brain interface in deep brain stimulation using finite element models with graded complexity in structure and solution

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an increasingly used surgical therapy for a range of neurological disorders involving the long-term electrical stimulation of various regions of the human brain in a disorder specific manner. Despite being used for the last 20 years, the underlying mechanisms are still not known, and disputed. In particular, when the electrodes are implanted into the human brain, an interface is created with changing biophysical properties which may impact on stimulation. We previously defined the electrode–brain interface (EBI) as consisting of three structural elements: the quadripolar DBS electrode, the peri-electrode space and the surrounding brain tissue. In order to understand more about the nature of this EBI, we used structural computational models of this interface, and estimated the effects of stimulation using coupled axon models. These finite element models differ in complexity, each highlighting a different feature of the EBI's effect on the DBS-induced electric field. We show that the quasi-static models are sufficient to demonstrate the difference between the acute and chronic clinical stages post-implantation. However, the frequency-dependent models are necessary as the waveform shaping has a major influence on the activation of neuronal fibres. We also investigate anatomical effects on the electric field, by taking specific account of the ventricular system in the human brain. Taken together, these models allow us to visualise the static, dynamic and target specific properties of the DBS-induced field in the surrounding brain regions.