Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish whether new prosthetic materials with absorbable components, designed to reduce the amount of foreign material in abdominal wall repair, offer advantages over the conventional polypropylene meshes. METHODS: Seven x 5 cm defects created in the anterior abdominal wall of New Zealand white rabbits were repaired by using a nonabsorbable polypropylene prosthesis (Surgipro; Tyco, Barcelona, Spain) or 1 of 2 partially absorbable prostheses available on the market (Vypro II and Ultrapro; Johnson & Johnson, St. Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium). At 14 and 90 days after surgery, tissue/prosthesis specimens were subjected to histological studies, biomechanical strength tests, and shrinkage evaluation. RESULTS: At 90 days, the absorbable filaments of Vypro II had been completely reabsorbed, whereas Ultrapro only showed signs of biodegradation in a few zones. Host tissue infiltration and collagen I deposition in the 3 reticular meshes was optimal. Macrophage counts, mesh shrinkage, and biomechanical resistance values were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Partially absorbable prostheses perform as well as the standard polypropylene mesh and have the benefit that less foreign material remains in the recipient, without compromising mechanical resistance.     

Ubiquitous use of prosthetic mesh in inguinal hernia repair: the dilemma

Summary The omnipresence of prosthetic materials (mesh) used in hernia repairs throughout the world deserves careful review. The propensity to develop operative techniques wherein prosthetic mesh is used routinely, regardless of type hernia, has reached an unacceptable level of practice. Being foreign bodies, postoperative complications occur which directly can be traced to the implanted meshes. Recent interest in mesh complications, i.e., infection, mesh shrinkage, migration and fistula formation, has escalated. Although mesh foreign body tumorigenesis has not been seen in humans following hernia repair, there is sufficient animal data to cause concern. Similarly, neural complications following use of mesh, particularly after the open anterior notension repair methods, are being reported at alarming rates. Many types of inguinal hernias do not need mesh repairs. It is our premise that these hernias must be identified preoperatively. Certainly, type I, II and III C inguinal hernias of our classification, should not receive a prosthetic mesh repair. If prosthetic mesh is to be used, it should be placed to buttress the inguinal wall posteriorly so that advantage of Pascal's law may be assured.     

The new 4DDome prosthesis: an original light and partially absorbable composite mesh for hernia repair

Introduction The use of non-absorbable meshes for the repair of inguinal hernias has become standard; however, these meshes have been associated with complications including long-term postoperative pain. To this end, a new partially absorbable composite mesh has been developed, and the aim of this study was to investigate its efficacy in animal and human trials. Materials and methods Sixty male Wistar rats were used to evaluate the behavior of the newly designed composite mesh. Composite meshes were implanted in the extra-peritoneal plane for 2, 4 and 8 weeks and compared to a standard polypropylene mesh. Forty patients with symptomatic inguinal hernias were treated using a new 4DDome designed prosthesis. Follow-up was by clinical and ultrasound examination at 1, 6 and 12 months. Results The animal study demonstrated that the inflammatory reaction associated with the new composite mesh was significantly lower than a standard polypropylene mesh, characterized by a lower macrophage infiltrate (P < 0.001). The mesh did not shrink over the 8-week period, unlike the polypropylene mesh (P < 0.05). The human study showed that there were three minor postoperative complications, no recurrences and the mesh was well tolerated. Follow-up with serial ultrasound showed that at 10 days and 1 month the dome was clearly visible in position; however, by 6 months it had flattened out, been partially absorbed and become incorporated into the repair. Conclusion These experimental and clinical studies have validated the concept of the new 4DDome composite mesh. It was well tolerated and was associated with good short-term results. The combination of the dome shape and the new composite mesh means that less polypropylene is required and represents a significant advance in anterior hernia repair.     

Netzschrumpfung in der Hernienchirurgie

Objectives

According to an estimated mesh shrinkage following hernia repair of up to 40% a current dogma in hernia surgery requires a mesh overlap of 5 cm around the hernia. However, no valid data addressing this problem of mesh shrinkage are available at present.

Patients and methods

Within the framework of a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial, 50 patients were operated on for a ventral abdominal hernia with the open sublay technique using specially prepared radio-opaque polypropylene (PP) meshes. Of the patients 27 received a conventional heavyweight mesh (P group) and 23 a new lightweight mesh construction (NK group). Follow-up for at least 2 years after mesh repair included conventional abdominal x-rays after 7 days, 3 weeks and 4, 12 and 24 months, as well as computed tomography after 7 days and 4 and 12 months. Main criteria were mesh shrinkage, recurrence and complication rates and quality of life comparing groups P and NK.

Results

In 46 cases (92%) no mesh shrinkage could be detected and only 4 meshes (8%) showed a moderate shrinkage (1 of 22.2%, 2 of 8% and 1 of 3%) all from the P group. While no hernia recurrences were found, 2 surgical complications occurred with 1 seroma in the P group and 1 hematoma in the NK group. Quality of life showed a linear improvement over time up to the 2 year time point following mesh repair with advantages for the NK group. Pain and mobility scores reached standard values 12 months postoperatively without significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

In principle PP meshes following an uncomplicated ventral hernia repair do not shrink at all. A moderate shrinkage in isolated cases might occur following heavyweight mesh implantation. Under controlled conditions recurrence as well as complication rates are equal for heavyweight and lightweight PP meshes. Quality of life improves up to 2 years following mesh repair with a trend to a better outcome for lightweight meshes. Pain and mobility scores reached standard values 12 months postoperatively without significant differences between the lightweight and heavyweight meshes.     

Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model

Background  Effective laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy mandates the use of an intraperitoneal mesh. Visceral adhesions and shrinkage of prosthetics may complicate repairs. The aim of this study was to compare adhesion formation, mesh shrinkage and tissue ingrowth after intra-abdominal placement of a novel two-component monofilament mesh structure made of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) with current alternatives. Materials and methods  Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Mesh samples were fixed as intra-abdominal only mesh at the right lateral abdominal wall. The study groups were: PVDF+PP (polypropylene parietally and polyvinylidenfluoride viscerally), PP+Col (polypropylene with a collagenoxidized film), ePTFE (smooth surface viscerally and a textured surface parietally), and PP (a pure polypropylene mesh serving as control). The meshes were explanted after 30 days. Adhesions were scored as a percentage of explanted biomaterials’ affected surface area; prosthetic shrinkage was calculated. Foreign-body reaction to mesh materials was measured by investigating the amount of inflammatory infiltrate and fibrotic tissue formation. Results  In terms of adhesion score, the pure PP mesh showed the highest values followed by the ePTFE, PVDF+PP, and PP+Col meshes. Quantitative assessment of adhesion area revealed a significantly higher value of the pure PP mesh sample (62.0 ± 22.1%) compared with the PP+Col (26.8 ± 12.1%) and the PVDF+PP mesh (34.6 ± 8.2%). Percentage of shrinkage showed a significantly higher value of the ePTFE mesh (52.4 ± 13.9%) compared with all other mesh modifications (PP+Col 19.8 ± 13.9%, PVDF+PP 19.9 ± 7.0%, and PP 26.8 ± 9.5%). Inflammatory infiltrate was significantly reduced in the PVDF+PP mesh group compared with all other mesh samples. Conclusion  The use of the novel two-component monofilament mesh structure made of polypropylene and polyvinylidenfluoride was found to be favorable regarding adhesion formation and mesh shrinkage compared to conventional mesh materials used for intra-abdominal placement.     

Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of shrinkage of meshes used for hernia repair. DESIGN: Experimental study in dogs. SETTING: University hospital, Germany and University Research Centre, Moscow. ANIMALS: 10 dogs had monofilament polypropylene meshes that weighed 95 g/m2 (Marlex) or multifilament reduced polypropylene meshes combined with polyglactin 910 that weighed 55 g/m2 (Soft Hernia Mesh) implanted for either 3 or 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histological appearance and radiological assessment of the position and area of the mesh. RESULTS: After 4 weeks the area of mesh in the monofilament group was reduced from to 139 (11) to 75 (8) cm2 (54%) and that of the multifilament from 116 (18) to 77 (20) cm2 (66%). The multifilament mesh with the reduced amount of polypropylene showed less inflammatory response and less shrinkage. The mesh did not seem to have moved. CONCLUSION: Meshes that contain a lot of polypropylene shrink to about 30%-50% of their original size after 4 weeks, requiring an overlap of at least 3 cm if implanted subfascially. Reduction in the polypropylene content decreases both the inflammatory response and the shrinkage. Meshes with big pores are less likely to fold and improve compatibility.     

Retromuskuläre Netzplastik: Erfahrungen aus Frankreich

Large incisional hernias cannot be cured without prosthetic material. A large pore size prosthetic tissue seems to be the best alternative, since connective invasion of the mesh provides a very strong fixation of the prosthesis. In our view, the mesh should be placed in the rectus sheath, in a position we have described as "retromuscular prefascial". With this technique, a good result can be achieved in 98% of very large incisional hernias.     

Mesh migration into the esophageal wall after mesh hiatoplasty: comparison of two alloplastic materials

Background

Hiatal mesh implantation in the operative treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has become an increasing therapy option. Besides clinical results little is known about histological changes in the esophageal wall.

Methods

Two different meshes [polypropylene (PP), Prolene^®; polypropylene–polyglecaprone 25 composite (PP–PG), Ultrapro^®] were placed on the diaphragm circular the esophagus of 20 female rabbits. After three months a swallow with iodine water-soluble contrast medium for functional analysis was performed. After the animals were sacrificed, histopathological evaluation of the foreign-body reaction, the localization of the mesh relating to the esophageal wall was analyzed.

Results

Sixteen rabbits survived the complete observation period of three months. After three months distinctive mesh shrinkage was observed in all animals and meshes had lost up to 50% of their original size before implantation. We found a delayed passage of the fluid into the stomach in all operated animals. There was a significant increased diameter of the outer ring of granulomas in the PP group (76.5 ± 8.0) compared to the PP–PG group (64 ± 8.5; p = 0.002). However, we found a mesh migration into the esophageal wall in six out of seven animals (PP) and five out of nine animals (PP-PG), respectively.

Conclusion

Experimental data suggest that more knowledge is necessary to assess the optimal size, structure, and position of prosthetic materials for mesh hiatoplasty. The indication for mesh implantation in the hiatal region should be carried out very carefully.

     

Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology

Background: A variety of alloplastic materials are used for hernia repair. We discuss the long-term stability and possible shrinkage of these materials. In the past, measurement of pore sizes was used to study the physical properties of alloplastic meshes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement of pore sizes with regard to its correlation to possible mesh alteration. Methods: The water absorption of different polypropylene (PP) and polyester (PE) mesh materials under defined conditions was studied. For shrinkage studies, meshes were stored in formaldehyde, distilled water, saline solution, trypsin solution, urea solution, and hydrogen peroxide. The measurement of the relation between material and pore was evaluated to investigate the potential shrinking and enlargement processes. This material–pore index (MPI) before as well as 1, 7, and 14 days after incubation was measured. Results: In comparison to measuring single pore sizes, MPI determination is the more efficient method to evaluate the possible shrinking or enlargement processes of alloplastic materials. With this technique, incorrect determination of pore sizes due to the dynamic textile structure of meshes and to shrinkage or enlargement, is excluded. All tested alloplastic materials showed an insignificant increase in water absorption under the condition of rehydration up to 0.4%. We did not observe variances in the material in shrinking or enlargement. Conclusions: MPI was found to be more reliable than measuring single pores to investigate possible external influences on polymer materials. Biomaterials such as PP and PE proved to be absolutely inert under various in vitro conditions.     

Surgical anatomy of the inguinal region: implications during inguinal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy

INTRODUCTION: In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair the inguinal region is approached and hernia repair performed from the interior side instead of the classical open external access. Exploration and placement of staplers in the internal inguinal region during laparoscopic hernia repair may sever different anatomical structures, or induce specific complications such as nerve entrapment, neuralgia, hematomas or osteitis. The incidence of these complications may be reduced by careful dissection of the preperitoneal tissues and by placing a prosthetic mesh without the use of stapling. As laparoscopic techniques evolved, different sizes of meshes have been used. An exact determination of mesh size was hitherto not investigated. AIM: Cadaver studies of the topography of blood vessels and nerves in the preperitoneal tissue in this region were carried out in order to assess a safe position and adequate size of the prosthetic mesh. METHODS: Dissection in 6 preserved human female cadavers was performed to define the actual surface of the internal inguinal region. A physical model was developed to formulate the ideal size of the prosthesis. Specific measurements were used to define the maximal size of the meshes, so as to place them without stapling, and without inducing neurovascular complications. RESULTS: The designed physical formula defines the size of the mesh as a function of the maximum intra-abdominal pressure, the size of the abdominal wall defect and the abdominal wall tension. CONCLUSION: On mathematical and physical grounds our study points out that the size of the currently used prosthetic mesh (10 x 15 cm) is large enough to be placed without stapling so that with proper placement no recurrences should occur.     

A lightweight,partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model

Background A meticulous surgical technique, a mesh of adequate dimensions, and use of a mesh with good biocompatibility properties are decisively important for minimizing the development of recurrences after endoscopic hernia repair surgery. Mesh “shrinkage” is a function of the mesh’s biocompatibility, that is, the properties of the mesh. Large-pore, lightweight polypropylene meshes possess the best biocompatibility, and the newly developed meshes meet these requirements. Methods Using a totally extraperitoneal technique in an experimental animal model, 10 domestic pigs were implanted with a lightweight, large-pore polypropylene mesh containing an absorbable component consisting of poliglecaprone (Ultrapro). After a period of 91 days, diagnostic laparoscopy followed by explantation of the specimens for macroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical evaluation was performed. Results The mean mesh shrinkage was a mere 1.9%. The partial volume of the inflammatory cells was a low 15.8%. The markers of cell turnover, namely Ki67 and the apoptosis index, were, at 5.8 and 2.1, respectively, also very low. The extracellular matrix showed a low value of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) (50.8). The mean value of collagen 1 was 136.9. Conclusions As a result of its good biocompatibility and elastic properties, the lightweight, large-pore Ultrapo mesh showed only a very slight tendency to “shrink.” This renders it extremely well suited for clinical use in hernia repair surgery, and its minimal shrinkage characteristic should help in achieving low complication and recurrence rates.     

A new prosthetic implant for inguinal hernia repair: its features in a porcine experimental model

Even after more than 100 years of inguinal hernia repair, the rate of complications and recurrence remains unacceptably high. In the last decades, few effective advances in surgical technique and materials have been made. The authors see them as minor adjustments in the shape and materials of the prosthetic implants. Still, the underlying genesis of inguinal hernia remains undefined. Based upon this, it seems the surgical repair of inguinal protrusions cannot be based upon the pathogenesis because the etiology to date has not been addressed. Most hernia repairs are performed with some degree of point fixation (sutures/tacks) to stop the mesh from migrating and creating high recurrence rates. This should be a priority for our considerations, as fixating mesh puts it in stark contrast to the physiology and dynamics of the myotendineal structures of the groin. Following years of surgical practice, implant fixation, mesh shrinkage, and poor quality of tissue ingrowth still represent an unresolved issue in modern hernia repair. Conventional prosthetics used for inguinal hernia repair are static and passive. They do not move in harmony with the dynamic elements of the groin structure and, as a result, induce the ingrowth of thin scar plates or shrinking regressive tissue that colonizes the implants. The authors strongly believe that these characteristics may be a contributing factor for recurrences and patient discomfort. Other complications are reported in the literature to be a direct result of fixation of the implants, such as bleeding, nerve entrapment, hematoma, pain, discomfort, and testicular complications. To improve results by respecting the physiology and kinetics of the inguinal region, we felt that a new type of prosthesis should be designed that induces a more structured tissue ingrowth similar to the natural biologic components of the abdominal wall. This prosthetic device was specifically designed to be placed with no point fixation. This was achieved by using inherent radial recoil, vertical buffering, friction, and delivering the device in a constrained state. A secondary benefit of this "dynamic" design is that the implant moves in a three-dimensional way in unison with the movements of the myotendineal structures of the groin. The results appear to show that the three-dimensional structure not only acts as a suitable scaffold for a full thickness ingrowth of a tissue barrier but also seems to induce an ordered, supple, elastic tissue, which allows for neorevascularization and neoneural growth. The outcomes indicate a reduced impact of fibrotic shrinkage on the implant/scar tissue when compared with shrinkage of polypropylene meshes reported in the literature. This pilot study shows the features of such an implant in a porcine experimental model.     

Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh

Background  The potential for shrinkage of intraperitoneally implanted meshes for laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia (LRVIH) remains a concern. Numerous experimental studies on this issue reported very inconsistent results. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh has the unique property of being revealed by computed tomography (CT). We therefore conducted an analysis of CT findings in patients who had previously undergone LRVIH with an ePTFE mesh (DualMesh, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) in order to evaluate the shrinkage of implanted meshes. Patients and methods  Of 656 LRVIH patients with DualMesh, all patients who subsequently underwent CT scanning were identified and only those with precisely known transverse diameter of implanted mesh and with CT scans made more than 3 months postoperatively were selected (n = 40). Two radiologists who were blinded to the size of the implanted mesh measured in consensus the maximal transverse diameter of the meshes by using the AquariusNET program (TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). Mesh shrinkage was defined as the relative loss of transverse diameter as compared with the original transverse diameter of the mesh. Results  The mean time from LRVIH to CT scan was 17.9 months (range 3–59 months). The mean shrinkage of the mesh was 7.5% (range 0–23.7%). For 11 patients (28%) there was no shrinkage at all. Shrinkage of 1–10% was found in 16 patients (40%), of 10–20% in 10 patients (25%), and of 20–24% in 3 patients (7.5%). No correlation was found regarding the elapsed time between LRVIH and CT, and shrinkage. There were two recurrences, one possibly related to shrinkage. Conclusion  Our observations indicate that shrinkage of DualMesh is remarkably lower than has been reported in experimental studies (8–51%). This study is the first to address the problem of shrinkage after intraperitoneal implantation of synthetic mesh in a clinical material.     

Meshes in inguinal hernia repair

Repair of a groin hernia is strongly influenced by prosthetic mesh implantation carried out in nearly 50 % of all operations. Recurrency rates, however, did not decrease by this policy. Many different materials are available. Due to bioinstability on the long-term and elevated infection rates PTFE is not suitable for inguinal hernia repair. Polyester also provides no long-term stability and induces a chronic foreign body reaction. Polypropylene initially leads to an acute inflammatory reaction and often ends in fibrosis. Both reactions are related to the weight of the used mesh. All materials may lead to specific complications. These include seroma formation, infection, migration of the prosthesis with arrosion of organs, damage of the vas deferens, development of recurrency by shrinkage of the fibers around the mesh, formation of adhesions in the preperitoneal position, and chronic inguinal pain. Therefore, meshes should be used only after individual estimation of risks and benefit. This includes the hernia classification, the number of previous operations and the possibility of a defect in collagen metabolism. The unknown long-term risks for the patient may be taken only in strong indications.     

Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair requires an intraperitoneal prosthetic; however, these materials are not without consequences. We evaluated host reaction to intraperitoneal placement of various prosthetics and the functional outcomes in an animal model. Mesh (n = 15 per mesh type) was implanted on intact peritoneum in New Zealand white rabbits. The mesh types included ePTFE (DualMesh), ePTFE and polypropylene (Composix), polypropylene and oxidized regenerated cellulose (Proceed), and polypropylene (Marlex). Adhesion formation was evaluated at 1, 4, 8, and 16 weeks using 2-mm mini-laparoscopy. Adhesion area, adhesion tenacity, prosthetic shrinkage, and compliance were evaluated after mesh explantation at 16 weeks. DualMesh had significantly less adhesions than Proceed, Composix, or Marlex at 1, 4, 8, and 16 weeks (P < 0.0001). Marlex had significantly more adhesions than other meshes at each time point (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in adhesions between Proceed and Composix meshes. After mesh explantation, the mean area of adhesions for Proceed (4.6%) was less than for Marlex (21.7%; P = 0.001). The adhesions to Marlex were statistically more tenacious than the DualMesh and Composix groups. Overall prosthetic shrinkage was statistically greater for DualMesh (34.7%) than for the remaining mesh types (P < 0.01). Mesh compliance was similar between the groups. Prosthetic materials demonstrate a wide variety of characteristics when placed inside the abdomen. Marlex formed more adhesions with greater tenacity than the other mesh types. DualMesh resulted in minimal adhesions, but it shrank more than the other mesh types. Each prosthetic generates a varied host reaction. Better understanding of these reactions can allow a suitable prosthetic to be chosen for a given patient in clinical practice.     

Laparoscopic evaluation of abdominal adhesions with different prosthetic meshes in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic materials to reinforce the abdominal wall is associated with a low index of recurrence; however, intraperitoneal placement of a foreign body may lead to adhesions. The present investigation was designed to determine adhesion formation with commercially available meshes implanted laparoscopically in rabbits. METHODS: Three different meshes were implanted laparoscopically in 24 rabbits: polypropylene (mesh A), polypropylene and sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (mesh B), and polypropylene and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (mesh C). Sites of implantation for each mesh (the left lower quadrant, right lower quadrant, and lower midline) were randomly determined so that every rabbit had all 3 meshes implanted. All animals underwent diagnostic laparoscopy after 28 days to grade adhesions and histological analysis of inflammation. RESULTS: Adhesions were noticed in 46 of the 72 meshes implanted (64%). The number of adhesions was higher for mesh C (87.5%) compared with meshes A (62.5%) and B (41.6%). The severity of adhesions was also higher for mesh C (grade I in 14, II in 6, and III in 1) compared with mesh A (grade I in 10, II in 4, and III in 1 case) and B (all of them grade II). Histological inflammatory reaction was classified as mild in 23 cases of mesh A, 15 of mesh B, and 23 of mesh C. A moderate reaction was found in 1 case of mesh A, 4 cases of mesh B, and 1 case of mesh C. Severe reaction was induced in 5 cases of mesh B. Mesh B induced a higher inflammatory reaction compared with the other meshes. CONCLUSIONS: All meshes induced adhesions of different grades. Mesh B had fewer adhesions and more intense inflammation them did the others.     

Prosthetic closure of the esophageal hiatus in large hiatal hernia repair and laparoscopic antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has become the standard surgical approach to both surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and large/paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair with excellent long-term results and high patient satisfaction. However, several studies have shown that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is associated with high recurrence rates. Therefore, some authors recommend the use of prosthetic meshes for either laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair or laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The aim of this article was to review available studies regarding the evolution, different techniques, results, and future perspectives concerning the use of prosthetic materials for closure of the esophageal hiatus. METHODS: A search of electronic databases, including Medline and Embase, was performed to identify available articles regarding prosthetic hiatal closure for large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair and/or laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Techniques and results as well as recurrence rates and complications related to the use of prosthetics for hiatal closure were reviewed and compared. Additionally, recent experiences and recommendations of experienced experts in this field were collected. RESULTS: The results of 42 studies were analyzed in this review. Some techniques of mesh hiatal closure were evaluated; however, most authors prefer posterior mesh cruroplasty. The type and shape of hiatal meshes vary from small angular meshes to A-shaped, V-shaped, or complete circular meshes. The most frequently utilized materials are polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, or dual meshes. All studies show a low rate of postoperative hernia recurrence, with no mortality and low morbidity. In particular, comparative studies including two prospective randomized trials comparing simple sutured hiatal closure to prosthetic hiatal closure show a significantly lower rate of postoperative hiatal hernia recurrence and/or intrathoracic wrap migration in patients who underwent prosthetic hiatal closure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic large hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair with prosthetic meshes as well as laparoscopic antireflux surgery with prosthetic hiatal closure are safe and effective procedures to prevent hiatal hernia recurrence and/or postoperative intrathoracic wrap migration, with low complication rates. The type of mesh, particularly the size and shape, is still controversial and is a matter for future research in this field.     

Predictors of mesh explantation after incisional hernia repair

Background

Prosthetic mesh used for incisional hernia repair (IHR) reduces hernia recurrence. Mesh infection results in significant morbidity and challenges for subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction. The risk factors that lead to mesh explantation are not well known.

Methods

This is a multisite cohort study of patients undergoing IHR at 16 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 1998 to 2002.

Results

Of the 1,071 mesh repairs, 55 (5.1%) had subsequent mesh explantation at a median of 7.3 months (interquartile range 1.4–22.2) after IHR with permanent mesh prosthesis. Infection was the most common reason for explantation (69%). No differences were observed by the type of repair. Adjusting for covariates, same-site concomitant surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.3) and postoperative surgical site infection (HR = 6.5) were associated with mesh explantation.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing IHR with concomitant intra-abdominal procedures have a greater than 6-fold increased hazard of subsequent mesh explantation. Permanent prosthetic mesh should be used with caution in this setting.     

不同材质补片固定大鼠膈肌后的炎症反应、粘连及补片皱缩情况对比研究

背景与目的：食管裂孔疝是外科常见病症，临床上多采用补片以无张力修补的方式进行治疗。食管裂孔疝的补片修补中补片的选择及其应用效果方面的实验数据仍相对缺乏。因此，本研究通过在大鼠食道裂孔处膈肌组织上分别固定聚丙烯补片和复合补片，比较两种材质补片对周围组织的影响，以及自身皱缩情况，为临床食管裂孔疝补片的选择提供参考。方法：雄性SD大鼠在分离胃部与肝脏相连接组织显露胃食道裂孔后，分别用单丝缝线将轻量聚丙烯补片（聚丙烯补片组）或复合补片（复合补片组）固定于食道裂孔处膈肌组织，或不进行补片固定（假手术组）。分别在术后7、15、30 d时记录每组每只大鼠的体质量和饮食量。观察30 d后处死大鼠，分析补片皱缩程度、粘连强度以及膈肌组织的病理学变化。结果：各组大鼠手术前后的体质量及每天进食量均无明显的变化（均P>0.05）。复合补片组膈肌组织与补片的粘连范围及粘连程度分值均明显低于聚丙烯补片组（均P<0.05）；两组补片均出现皱缩，但复合补片组术后补片面积明显大于聚丙烯补片组，皱缩率明显低于聚丙烯补片组（均P<0.05）；与假手术组比较，聚丙烯补片组和复合补片组膈肌组织出现局部肌纤维萎...