Feasibility study on the potential of a spiral blade in osteoporotic distal femur fracture fixation

Introduction

Osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur (primary as well as periprosthetic) are a growing problem in today’s trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, this feasibility study should identify the biomechanical potential of a (commercially available) spiral blade in the distal femur as compared to a single screw without any additional plate fixation. Additionally, the influence of cement augmentation was investigated.

Materials and methods

An artificial low density bone model was either instrumented with a perforated spiral blade or a 5 mm locking screw only. Additionally, the influence of 1 ml cement augmentation was investigated. All specimens were tested with static pull-out and cyclic loading (50 to 250 N with an increment of 0.1 N/cycle).

Results

In the non-augmented groups, the mean pull-out force was significantly higher for the blade fixation (p < 0.001). In the augmented groups, the difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.217). Augmentation could increase pull-out force significantly by 72 % for the blade and 156 % for the screw, respectively (p = 0.001). The mean number of cycles to failure in the non-augmented groups was 12,433 (SD 465) for the blade and 2,949 (SD 215) for the screw, respectively (p < 0.001). In the augmented group, the blade reached 13,967 (SD 1,407) cycles until failure and the screw reached 4,413 (SD 1,598), respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The investigated spiral blade was mechanically superior, significantly, as compared to a screw in the distal femur. These results back up the further development of a distal femoral blade with spiral blade fixation for the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures.     

Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing

Purpose

For posterior spinal stabilization, loosening of pedicle screws at the bone-screw interface is a clinical complication, especially in the osteoporotic population. Axial pullout testing is the standard pre-clinical testing method for new screw designs although it has questioned clinical relevance. The aim of this study was to determine the fixation strength of three current osteoporotic fixation techniques and to investigate whether or not pullout testing results can directly relate to those of the more physiologic fatigue testing.

Methods

Thirty-nine osteoporotic, human lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws according to four treatment groups: (1) screw only (control), (2) prefilled augmentation, (3) screw injected augmentation, and (4) unaugmented screws with an increased diameter. Toggle testing was first performed on one pedicle, using a cranial-caudal sinusoidal, cyclic (1.0 Hz) fatigue loading applied at the screw head. The initial compressive forces ranged from 25 to 75 N. Peak force increased stepwise by 25 N every 250 cycles until a 5.4-mm screw head displacement. The contralateral screw then underwent pure axial pullout (5 mm/min).

Results

When compared to the control group, screw injected augmentation increased fatigue force (27 %, p = 0.045) while prefilled augmentation reduced fatigue force (?7 %, p = 0.73). Both augmentation techniques increased pullout force compared to the control (ps < 0.04). Increasing the screw diameter by 1 mm increased pullout force (24 %, p = 0.19), fatigue force (5 %, p = 0.73), and induced the least stiffness loss (?29 %) from control.

Conclusions

For the osteoporotic spine, screw injected augmentation showed the best biomechanical stability. Although pullout testing was more sensitive, the differences observed were not reflected in the more physiological fatigue testing, thus casting further doubt on the clinical relevance of pullout testing.     

The effect of two different trochanteric nail lag-screw designs on fixation stability of four-part intertrochanteric fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study

Objectives

To compare lag-screw sliding characteristics and fixation stability of two cephalomedullary nails (CMN) with different lag-screw designs (solid and telescopic), we conducted a biomechanical study and an analysis of clinical results.

Methods

Six pairs of cadaver femurs with simulated intertrochanteric fractures were randomly assigned to one of two CMN fixations. Femur constructs were statically then cyclically loaded on an MTS machine. Lag-screw sliding and inferior and lateral femoral head displacements were measured, following which failure strength of the construct was determined. Forty-five patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with these CMN were identified. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed and analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t test to determine lag-screw sliding.

Results

No difference was seen with cycling in inferior femoral head displacement between the two screw designs. The solid screw had an average inferior head displacement of 1.75 mm compared with 1.59 mm for the telescoping screw (p = 0.772). The solid lag screws slid an average of 2.79 mm lateral from the nail, whereas the telescoping screws slid an average of 0.27 mm (p = 0.003). In our clinical review, the average lateral sliding of the telescoping screw was 0.5 mm and of the solid screw was 3.7 mm (p < 0.001). Despite differences in lateral sliding, there were no reoperations for prominent or painful hardware in either group.

Conclusions

Both designs are acceptable devices for stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical and biomechanical data demonstrate greater lateral sliding in the solid lag-screw group, making for greater potential for lateral-sided hip pain in CMNs with solid lag screws as opposed to telescoping lag screws.     

Biomechanical evaluation of the primary stability of pedicle screws after augmentation with an innovative bone stabilizing system

Introduction

In today’s aging population, diminished bone quality often affects the outcome of surgical treatment. This occurs especially when surgical implants must be fixed to bone, as it occurs when lumbar fusion is performed with pedicle screws. Besides Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injection, several techniques have been developed to augment pedicle screws. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the primary stability of an innovative system (IlluminOss?) for the augmentation of pedicle screws in an experimental cadaveric setup. IlluminOss? is an innovative technology featuring cement with similar biochemical characteristics to aluminum-free glass-polyalkenoate cement (GPC).

Materials and methods

IlluminOss? was inserted transpedicularly via a balloon/catheter system in 40 human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. For comparability, each vertebra was treated bilaterally with pedicle screws, augmented and non-augmented. The maximum failure load during pull out test was documented by a universal material testing machine.

Results

The results showed significantly higher failure loads for the augmented pedicle screws (Median 555.0 ± 261.0 N, Min. 220.0 N, Max. 1,500.0 N), compared to the native screws (Median 325.0 ± 312.1 N, Min. 29.0 N, Max. 1,400.0 N).

Conclusions

Based on these data, we conclude the IlluminOss? system can be used to augment primary screw stability regarding axial traction, compared to native screws. The IlluminOss? monomer offers ease of control for use in biological tissues. In contrast to PMMA, no relevant heat is generated during the hardening process and there is no risk of embolism. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the usefulness of the IlluminOss? system in the in vivo augmentation of pedicle screws in the future.     

Position of polyaxial versus monoaxial screws in locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of a prospective randomized study

Background

Aim of the study was to compare the chosen position of polyaxial locking screws with the position of monoaxial screws in the humeral head of proximal humeral fractures treated by locked plating.

Methods

In a prospective randomized observational study, 124 consecutive patients (mean age 70.9 ± 14.8 years) sustaining a displaced proximal humeral fracture were treated with either monoaxial or polyaxial screw-inserted locking plate fixation. The chosen positions of locking screws were identified from standardized postoperative radiographs in anteroposterior and outlet-view, with regard to a regional mapping of the humeral head.

Results

In monoaxial locking technique, a mean of 6 screws purchased the humeral head (95 % CI 5.1–6.2), and in polyaxial locking technique, a mean of 4 screws (95 % CI 3.3–4.5), respectively. Screws were placed in the regions superolateral: monoaxial 24.8 %, polyaxial 20.7 % (p = 0.49); superomedial: monoaxial 21.9 %, polyaxial 20.0 % (p = 0.433); inferolateral: monoaxial 32.5 %, polyaxial 35.0 % (p = 0.354); inferomedial: monoaxial 20.8 %, polyaxial 24.2 % (p = 0.07), superoposterior: monoaxial 45.5 %, polyaxial 30.8 % (p = 0.57); superoanterior: monoaxial 4.4 %, polyaxial 8.3 % (p = 0.33); inferoposterior: monoaxial 22.5 %, polyaxial 29.8 % (p = 0.49) and inferoanterior: monoaxial 27.5 %, polyaxial: 31.2 % (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

The chosen screws’ position in monoaxial and polyaxial locking plate fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures do not differ significantly. However, loss of fixation is observed more frequently if the fixation did not include at least one screw within the superoposterior region of the humeral head, suggesting that a screw purchasing the superoposterior region is beneficial in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Level of evidence

Treatment Study, Level II.     

Are Quadrilateral Surface Buttress Plates Comparable to Traditional Forms of Transverse Acetabular Fracture Fixation?

Background

Several construct options exist for transverse acetabular fracture fixation. Accepted techniques use a combination of column plates and lag screws. Quadrilateral surface buttress plates have been introduced as potential fixation options, but as a result of their novelty, biomechanical data regarding their stabilizing effects are nonexistent. Therefore, we aimed to determine if this fixation method confers similar stability to traditional forms of fixation.

Questions/purposes

We biomechanically compared two acetabular fixation plates with quadrilateral surface buttressing with traditional forms of fixation using lag screws and column plates.

Methods

Thirty-five synthetic hemipelves with a transverse transtectal acetabular fracture were allocated to one of five groups: anterior column plate + posterior column lag screw, posterior column plate + anterior column lag screw, anterior and posterior column lag screws only, infrapectineal plate + anterior column plate, and suprapectineal plate alone. Specimens were loaded for 1500 cycles up to 2.5x body weight and stiffness was calculated. Thereafter, constructs were destructively loaded and failure loads were recorded.

Results

After 1500 cycles, final stiffness was not different with the numbers available between the infrapectineal (568 ± 43 N/mm) and suprapectineal groups (602 ± 87 N/mm, p = 0.988). Both quadrilateral plates were significantly stiffer than the posterior column buttress plate with supplemental lag screw fixation group (311 ± 99 N/mm, p < 0.006). No difference in stiffness was identified with the numbers available between the quadrilateral surface plating groups and the lag screw group (423 ± 219 N/mm, p > 0.223). The infrapectineal group failed at the highest loads (5.4 ± 0.6 kN) and this was significant relative to the suprapectineal (4.4 ± 0.3 kN; p = 0.023), lag screw (2.9 ± 0.8 kN; p < 0.001), and anterior buttress plate with posterior column lag screw (4.0 ± 0.6 kN; p = 0.001) groups.

Conclusions

Quadrilateral surface buttress plates spanning the posterior and anterior columns are biomechanically comparable and, in some cases, superior to traditional forms of fixation in this synthetic hemipelvis model.

Clinical Relevance

Quadrilateral surface buttress plates may present a viable alternative for the treatment of transtectal transverse acetabular fractures. Clinical studies are required to fully define the use of this new form of fixation for such fractures when accessed through the anterior intrapelvic approach.     

Prospective comparative study between straight and curved probe for pedicle screw insertion

Purpose

To evaluate difference in accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in thoracic and lumbosacral spine using a straight pedicle probe vis-à-vis a curved one.

Methods

Prospective, comparative, non-randomized, single-blind study. Straight and curved pedicle probes used on opposite sides of same vertebra in patients undergoing thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation for various indications. Postoperative blinded evaluation for pedicle breaches done with a CT scan. Pedicle breaches graded as grade 0: no breach, grade 1: <2 mm, grade 2: 2–4 mm and grade 3: >4 mm breach.

Results

After appropriate statistical power analysis, 300 screws inserted in 59 patients from T4–L5 levels. No significant differences noted between the two probes in terms of screw length [two-tailed p = 0.16]; grade 0 screws [two-tailed p = 0.49] or screws with grade 2/3 breaches [two-tailed  p = 0.68]. With the right-hand-dominant operating-surgeon standing to left of patient during surgery, no difference noted between the two probes for either the right or left-side pedicle screw insertion [two-tailed p = 1]. Repeating these tests in the subset of thoracic pedicle screws too, revealed no significant difference.

Conclusions

No significant difference in outcome of pedicle screw insertion with either a straight or a curved pedicle probe.     

Comparison between bovine bone and titanium interference screws for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical study

Introduction

The application of interference screws for the fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts is a well-established technique in anterior-cruciate ligament reconstruction. Interference screws derived from bovine compact bone are a biological alternative to metallic or biodegradable polymer interference screws.

Materials and methods

In 60 porcine specimens, the tibial part of an anterior-cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using a BPTB graft. To secure the graft, either an 8-mm titanium interference screw or a self-made bovine interference screw (BC), or a commercial bovine compact bone screw (Tutofix^®) was used. The maximum failure load was determined by means of a universal testing machine with computer interface at a testing speed of 50 mm/min. In a second test series, cyclic sub-maximal load was applied to the test specimen from 40 to 400 N with a number of 1,000 load cycles and a frequency of 1 Hz. Subsequently, the maximum failure load was determined. The stiffness of the test specimen was investigated in both test series. Each type of interference screw was tested 10 times.

Results

A secure fixation of the grafts was achieved with all interference screws. In the experiments on the maximum load to failures, the titanium screws showed significantly higher failure loads than the Tutofix^® screws (P = 0.005). The stiffness of the grafts fixed with BC screws was significantly higher as compared to the fixation with Tutofix^® screws (P = 0.005). After cyclic sub-maximal loading, the maximum failure load of the titanium screws was significantly higher than that of the Tutofix^® screws (P = 0.033). The fixation of the BC screws showed a significantly higher failure load (P = 0.021) and stiffness (P = 0.032) than the Tutofix^® screw fixation. Except for two screw head fractures and two intra-tendinous graft ruptures, the failure mode was slippage in the interface between interference screw and bone plug.

Conclusion

Interference screws derived from bovine compact bone show similar good results as the titanium interference screws. Therefore, the safety and in vivo performance of products derived from xenogenic bone should be the focus of further investigations.     

Screw perforation features in 129 consecutive patients performed computer-guided cervical pedicle screw insertion

Study design

A cross-sectional study of the data retrospectively collected by chart review.

Objectives

This study aimed to clarify screw perforation features in 129 consecutive patients treated with computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion and to determine important considerations for computer-assisted CPS insertion.

Summary of background data

CPS fixation has been criticized for the potential risk of serious injury to neurovascular structures. To avoid such serious risks, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation has been used during CPS insertion, but screw perforation can occur even with the use of a navigation system.

Methods

The records of 129 consecutive patients who underwent cervical (C2–C7) pedicle screw insertion using a CT-based navigation system from September 1997 to August 2013 were reviewed. Postoperative CT images were used to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement. The screw insertion status was classified as grade 1 (no perforation), indicating that the screw was accurately inserted in pedicle; grade 2 (minor perforation), indicating perforation of less than 50 % of the screw diameter; and grade 3 (major perforation), indicating perforation of 50 % or more of the screw diameter. We analyzed the direction and rate of screw perforation according to the vertebral level.

Results

The rate of grade 3 pedicle screw perforations was 6.7 % (39/579), whereas the combined rate of grades 2 and 3 perforations was 20.0 % (116/579). No clinically significant complications, such as vertebral artery injury, spinal cord injury, or nerve root injury, were caused by the screw perforations. Of the screws showing grade 3 perforation, 30.8 % screws were medially perforated and 69.2 % screws were laterally perforated. Of the screws showing grades 2 and 3 perforation, 21.6 % screws were medially perforated and 78.4 % screws were laterally perforated. Furthermore, we evaluated screw perforation rates according to the vertebral level. Grade 3 pedicle screw perforation occurred in 6.1 % of C2 screws; 7.5 % of C3 screws; 13.0 % of C4 screws; 6.5 % of C5 screws; 3.2 % of C6 screws; and 4.0 % of C7 screws. Grades 2 and 3 pedicle screw perforations occurred in 12.1 % of C2 screws, 22.6 % of C3 screws, 31.5 % of C4 screws, 22.2 % of C5 screws, 14.4 % of C6 screws, and 12.1 % of C7 screws. C3–5 screw perforation rate was significantly higher than C6–7 (p = 0.0024).

Conclusions

Careful insertion of pedicle screws is necessary, especially at C3 to C5, even when using a CT-based navigation system. Pedicle screws tend to be laterally perforated.     

Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly

Background

Therapy of vertebral fractures in the elderly is a growing challenge for surgeons. Within the last two decades, the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures has been widely established. Besides vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, the augmentation of pedicle screws with PMMA found widespread use to strengthen the implant–bone interface. Several studies showed an enhanced pullout strength of augmented screws compared to standard pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone models. To validate the clinical relevance, we analyzed postoperative radiologic follow-up data in regard to secondary loss of correction and loosening of pedicle screws in elderly patients.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective comparative study, 24 patients admitted to our level I trauma center were analyzed concerning screw loosening and secondary loss of correction following vertebral fracture and posterior instrumentation. Loss of correction was determined by the bisegmental Cobb angle and kyphosis angle of the fractured vertebra. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to analyze the prevalence of clear zones around the pedicle screws as a sign of loosening.

Results

In 15 patients (mean age 76 ± 9.3 years) with 117 PMMA-augmented pedicle screws, 4.3 % of screws showed signs of loosening, whereas in nine patients (mean age 75 ± 8.2 years) with 86 uncemented screws, the loosening rate was 62.8 %. Thus, PMMA-augmented pedicle screws showed a significantly lower loosening rate compared to regular pedicle screws. Loss of correction was minimal, despite poor bone quality. There was significantly less loss of correction in patients with augmented pedicle screws (1.1° ± 0.8°) as compared to patients without augmentation (5° ± 3.8°).

Conclusion

The reinforcement of pedicle screws using PMMA augmentation may be a viable option in the surgical treatment of spinal fractures in the elderly.     

CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws

Purpose

Single center evaluation of the placement accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted either with fluoroscopy or under CT-navigation using 3D-reconstruction and intraoperative computed tomography control of the screw position. There is in fact a huge variation in the reported placement accuracy of pedicle screws, especially concerning the screw placement under conventional fluoroscopy most notably due to the lack of the definition of screw misplacement, combined with a potpourri of postinstrumentation evaluation methods.

Methods

The operation data of 1,006 patients operated on in our clinic between 1995 and 2005 is analyzed retrospectively. There were 2,422 screws placed with the help of CT-navigation compared to 2,002 screws placed under fluoroscopy. The postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by a radiologist and an independent spine surgeon.

Results

In the lumbar spine, the placement accuracy was 96.4 % for CT-navigated screws and 93.9 % for pedicle screws placed under fluoroscopy, respectively. This difference in accuracy was statistically significant (Fishers Exact Test, p = 0.001). The difference in accuracy became more impressing in the thoracic spine, with a placement accuracy of 95.5 % in the CT-navigation group, compared to 79.0 % accuracy in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study underlines the relevance of CT-navigation-guided pedicle screw placement, especially when instrumentation of the middle and upper thoracic spine is carried out.     

Distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates and additional bone augmentation in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study in a cadaveric model

Background

Fractures of the distal radius represent the most common fractures in adults. Volar locked plating has become a popular method for treating these fractures, but has been subject to several shortcomings in osteoporotic bone, such as loss of reduction and screw purchase. In order to overcome these shortcomings, cement augmentation has been proposed.

Methods

AO-type 23-A3.3 fractures were made in 8 pairs of fresh frozen osteoporotic cadaveric radial bones. All specimens were treated with volar plating, and divided into cement augmentation or non-augmentation groups (n = 8/group). Constructs were tested dynamically and load to failure, construct-stiffness, fracture gap movement and screw cutting distance were measured.

Results

Cement augmentation resulted in a significant increase in cycles and load to failure, as well as construct stiffness at loads higher than 325 N. When compared to the non-augmented group, fracture gap movement decreased significantly at this load and higher, as did screw cutting distance at the holes of the ulnar column. The cycles to failure depend on the BMD in the distal region of the radius.

Conclusion

Cement augmentation improves biomechanical properties in volar plating of the distal radius.     

Biomechanical advantage of C1 pedicle screws over C1 lateral mass screws: a cadaveric study

Purpose

The established technique for posterior C1 screw placement is via the lateral mass. Use of C1 monocortical pedicle screws is an emerging technique which utilizes the bone of the posterior arch while avoiding the paravertebral venous plexus and the C2 nerve root. This study compared the relative biomechanical fixation strengths of C1 pedicle screws with C1 lateral mass screws.

Methods

Nine human C1 vertebrae were instrumented with one lateral mass screw and one pedicle screw. The specimens were subjected to sinusoidal, cyclic (0.5 Hz) fatigue loading. Peak compressive and tensile forces started from ±25 N and constantly increased by 0.05 N every cycle. Testing was stopped at 5 mm displacement. Cycles to failure, displacement, and initial and end stiffness were measured. Finally, CT scans were taken and the removal torque measured.

Results

The pedicle screw technique consistently and significantly outperformed the lateral mass technique in cycles to failure (1,083 ± 166 vs. 689 ± 240 cycles), initial stiffness (24.6 ± 3.9 vs. 19.9 ± 3.2 N/mm), end stiffness (16.6 ± 2.7 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6 N/mm) and removal torque (0.70 ± 0.78 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09 N m). Only 33 % of pedicle screws were loose after testing compared to 100 % of lateral mass screws.

Conclusions

C1 pedicle screws were able to withstand higher toggle forces than lateral mass screws while maintaining a higher stiffness throughout and after testing. From a biomechanical point of view, the clinical use of pedicle screws in C1 is a promising alternative to lateral mass screws.     

Intraoperative evaluation of dorsal screw prominence after polyaxial volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures utilizing the Hoya view: a cadaveric study

Background

The irregular nature of the dorsal surface of the distal radius makes it difficult to detect prominent screws with volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures using standard fluoroscopic images. This study evaluates the accuracy of a new radiographic method, the Hoya view, for the assessment of dorsal cortical screw penetration with volar plate fixation.

Methods

Eight cadaveric upper extremities underwent application of a volar distal radius plate with polyaxial locking screws placed distally. Utilizing a mini C-arm, lateral and Hoya views were obtained with notation of any dorsal cortical screw prominence. Dissection of the cadavers was then performed for direct visualization of screw prominence. The screws were then exchanged sequentially for screws 2-mm longer than their initial measurements with repeated imaging and direct visualization.

Results

The Hoya view revealed that 9.4 % of the screws penetrated the dorsal cortex with an average screw prominence of 1.08 mm (range 0.5–2 mm). None of the six prominent screws were detected with lateral views. With the Hoya view, six of six prominent screws were identified. With locking screws exchanged for screws 2-mm longer, 76.6 % of the screws had violated the dorsal cortex; of these, 24.5 % were detected with lateral imaging versus 100 % with the Hoya view.

Conclusions

This study supports the intraoperative use of the Hoya view to evaluate screw length and dorsal cortical screw penetration in volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. However, this view may be difficult to obtain in patients with limitations in elbow or shoulder range of motion.     

Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: economical optimization through screw density reduction

Introduction

Posterior-only approach using pedicle screws’ fixation has emerged as the preferred surgical technique for Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) correction. Insertion of multiple pedicle screws while increasing stability increases also the risk of complications related to screw malpositioning and surgical cost. The optimal screw density required in surgical correction of SK remains unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy of low screw density (LSD) versus high screw density (HSD) technique used in posterior-only correction of SK.

Methods

Twenty-one patients underwent surgical correction of SK between 2007 and 2011 and were reviewed after a mean of 29 months. HSD technique (i.e., 100 % of available pedicles, averaged 25.2 ± 4 screws) was used in 10 cases and LSD technique (i.e., 54–69 % of available pedicles in a pre-determined pattern, averaged 16.8 ± 1.3 screws; p < 0.001) was used in 11 cases. Kyphosis correction was assessed by comparing thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Cost saving analysis was performed for each group.

Results

Preoperative thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance were similar for both groups. The average postoperative kyphosis correction was similar in both HSD and LSD groups (29° ± 9° vs. 34° ± 6°, respectively; p = 0.14). Complication occurred in four patients (19 %) in the HSD group and in two patients (9 %) in the LSD group (p = 0.56). Three patients required re-operation. Compared to HSD using LSD saves 4,200£ per patient in hardware and 88,200£ for the entire cohort.

Conclusion

LSD technique is as safe and effective as HSD technique in posterior-only correction of SK. Implant-related cost could be reduced by 32 %.     

Biomechanical comparison of sagittal-parallel versus non-parallel pedicle screw placement

Background

While convergent placement of pedicle screws in the axial plane is known to be more advantageous biomechanically, surgeons intuitively aim toward a parallel placement of screws in the sagittal plane. It is however not clear whether parallel placement of screws in the sagittal plane is biomechanically superior to a non-parallel construct. The hypothesis of this study is that sagittal non-parallel pedicle screws do not have an inferior initial pull-out strength compared to parallel placed screws.

Methods

The established lumbar calf spine model was used for determination of pull-out strength in parallel and non-parallel intersegmental pedicle screw constructs. Each of six lumbar calf spines (L1-L6) was divided into three levels: L1/L2, L3/L4 and L5/L6. Each segment was randomly instrumented with pedicle screws (6/45 mm) with either the standard technique of sagittal parallel or non-parallel screw placement, respectively, under fluoroscopic control. CT was used to verify the intrapedicular positioning of all screws. The maximum pull-out forces and type of failure were registered and compared between the groups.

Results

The pull-out forces were 5,394 N (range 4,221 N to 8,342 N) for the sagittal non-parallel screws and 5,263 N (range 3,589 N to 7,554 N) for the sagittal-parallel screws (p?=?0.838). Interlevel comparisons also showed no statistically significant differences between the groups with no relevant difference in failure mode.

Conclusion

Non-parallel pedicle screws in the sagittal plane have at least equal initial fixation strength compared to parallel pedicle screws in the setting of the here performed cadaveric calf spine experiments.     

Comparison of revision strategies for failed C2-posterior cervical pedicle screws: a biomechanical study

Study purpose

With increasing usage within challenging biomechanical constructs, failures of C2 posterior cervical pedicle screws (C2-pCPSs) will occur. The purpose of the study was therefore to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of two revision techniques after the failure of C2-pCPSs.

Materials and methods

Twelve human C2 vertebrae were tested in vitro in a biomechanical study to compare two strategies for revision screws after failure of C2-pCPSs. C2 pedicles were instrumented using unicortical 3.5-mm CPS bilaterally (Synapse/Synthes, Switzerland). Insertion accuracy was verified by fluoroscopy. C2 vertebrae were potted and fixed in an electromechanical testing machine with the screw axis coaxial to the pullout direction. Pullout testing was conducted with load and displacement data taken continuously. The peak load to failure was measured in newtons (N) and is reported as the pullout resistance (POR). After pullout, two revision strategies were tested in each vertebra. In Group-1, revision was performed with 4.0-mm C2-pCPSs. In Group-2, revision was performed with C2-pedicle bone-plastic combined with the use of a 4-mm C2-pCPSs. For the statistical analysis, the POR between screws was compared using absolute values (N) and the POR of the revision techniques normalized to that of the primary procedures (%).

Results

The POR of primary 3.5-mm CPSs was 1,140.5 ± 539.6 N for Group-1 and 1,007.7 ± 362.5 N for Group-2; the difference was not significant. In the revision setting, the POR in Group-1 was 705.8 ± 449.1 N, representing a reduction of 38.1 ± 32.9 % compared with that of primary screw fixation. For Group-2, the POR was 875.3 ± 367.9 N, representing a reduction of 13.1 ± 23.4 %. A statistical analysis showed a significantly higher POR for Group-2 compared with Group-1 (p = 0.02). Although the statistics showed a significantly reduced POR for both revision strategies compared with primary fixation (p < 0.001/p = 0.001), the loss of POR (in %) in Group-1 was significantly higher compared with the loss in Group-2 (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Using a larger-diameter screw combined with the application of a pedicle bone-plastic, the POR can be significantly increased compared with the use of only an increased screw diameter.     

Sacropelvic fixation versus fusion to the sacrum for spondylodesis in multilevel degenerative spine disease

Study design

Retrospective study.

Objective

For successful multilevel correction and stabilization of degenerative spinal deformities, a rigid basal construct to the sacrum is indispensable. The primary objective of this study was to compare the results of two different sacropelvic fixation techniques to conventional stabilization to the sacrum in patients with multilevel degenerative spine disease.

Methods

A total of 69 patients with multisegmental fusion surgery (mean number of stabilized functional spinal units: 7.0 ± 3.3) with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. 32 patients received fixation to the sacrum (S1), 23 patients received S1 and iliac screw fixation (iliac) and 14 patients were treated with iliosacral plate fixation (plate). Primary outcome parameters were radiographic outcome concerning fusion in the segment L5–S1, rate of screw loosening, back and buttock pain reduction [numeric rating scale for pain evaluation: 0 indicating no pain, 10 indicating the worst pain], overall extent of disability after surgery (Oswestry Disability Index) and the number of complications.

Results

The three groups did not differ in body mass index, ASA score, the number of stabilized functional spinal units, duration of surgery, the number of previous spine surgeries, or postoperative complication rate. The incidence of L5–S1 pseudarthrosis after 1 year in the S1, iliac, and plate groups was 19, 0, and 29 %, respectively (p < 0.05 iliac vs. plate). The incidence of screw loosening after 1 year in the S1, iliac, and plate groups was 22, 4, and 43 %, respectively (p < 0.05 iliac vs. plate). Average Oswestry scores after 1 year in the S1, iliac, and plate groups were 40 ± 18, 42 ± 20, and 58 ± 18, respectively (p < 0.05 both S1 and iliac vs. plate).

Conclusion

The surgical treatment of multilevel degenerative spine disease carries a significant risk for pseudarthrosis and screw loosening, mandating a rigid sacropelvic fixation. The use of an iliosacral plate resulted in an inferior surgical and clinical outcome when compared to iliac screws.     

Locking versus standard screw fixation for acetabular cups: is there a difference?

Introduction

Total hip replacement has been established as a valid treatment option for displaced subcapital fractures. However, insufficient primary fixation may be the reason for early loosening in these osteoporotic patients. Primary fixation of the cup is usually achieved by press-fit fixation that can be enhanced using screws. Locking the screws into their respective cups may seem to improve the primary fixation of the construct, as locked plates proved superior fixation for osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

The study consisted of three groups: in each group, three cups were fixed into blocks of foam bone using press-fit technique. In the first group, no additional screws were used, in the second group two standard screws were inserted, while in the third group two acetabular screws were cemented into the cup to simulate locked screw fixation. Load was applied onto the rim of the acetabular component to cause shearing between the cup and the block. Cup fixation was examined by a loading machine that acquired load versus displacement. The stiffness (load vs. displacement) was calculated.

Results

Screws, either locked or non-locked, enhanced cup fixation by 26 % (p value <0.01). No significant changes were found between the locking and non-locking screws groups.

Discussion

These experimental results indicate that acetabular screws enhance primary cup fixation. This may become significant in conditions where the acetabular bone stock is suboptimal, such as when performing total hip arthroplasty after displaced subcapital fractures. However, there is no superiority for locked screws over standard screw fixation.     

Reduced cement volume does not affect screw stability in augmented pedicle screws

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is able to improve screw anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae but is associated with a high complication rate. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of different cement volumes on pedicle screw fatigue strength. Twenty-five human vertebral bodies (T12–L4) were collected from donors between 73 and 97 years of age. Bone density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography. Vertebral bodies were instrumented by conventional pedicle screws, and unilateral cement augmentation was performed. Thirteen vertebrae were augmented with a volume of 1 ml and twelve with a volume of 3 ml bone cement. A fatigue test was performed using a cranial–caudal sinusoidal, cyclic load (0.5 Hz) with increasing compression force (100 N + 0.1 N/cycles). The load to failure was 183.8 N for the non-augmented screws and was increased significantly to 268.1 N (p < 0.001) by cement augmentation. Augmentation with 1 ml bone cement increased the fatigue load by 41% while augmentation with 3 ml increased the failure load by 51% compared to the non-augmented screws, but there was no significant difference in fatigue loads between the specimens with screws augmented with 1 ml and screws augmented with 3 ml of bone cement (p = 0.504). Cement augmentation significantly increases pedicle screw stability. The benefit of augmentation on screw anchorage was not significantly affected by reducing the applied volume of cement from 3 ml to 1 ml. Considering the high risk of cement leakage during augmentation, we recommend the usage of a reduced volume of 1 ml bone cement for each pedicle screw. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material .