The effect of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost on intraocular pressure after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative topical latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost administration on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC IOL) implantation. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-masked study included 120 eyes of 120 consecutive, normotensive, uncomplicated cataract patients having phacoemulsification surgery with PC IOL implantation. They were randomized into 1 of 4 treatment groups, each of which had 30 patients. Two (2) h before the surgery, the patients received 0.005% latanoprost (Group 1), 0.004% bimatoprost (Group 2), 0.03% travoprost (Group 3), or placebo (Group 4, artificial tears). IOP was measured at preoperative, 4, 8, and 24 h postoperative with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. The anterior chamber was examined postoperatively 24 h for levels of cell and flare using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. RESULTS: The preoperative mean IOP was not statistically significant different among the four groups. In Groups 1 and 3, the mean IOP at 4, 8 and 24 h were significantly lower than the control (Group 4; P < 0.05). However, in Group 2, there was no significant difference in IOP during the study period, compared to the control (Group 4; P > 0.05). In addition, the mean postoperative IOP at 24 h in Groups 1 and 3 were significantly lower than the preoperative IOP (P < 0.05). No severe anterior chamber reaction was observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that a single-dose topical of latanoprost and travoprost can prevent early postoperative IOP elevation after phacoemulsification surgery without any sideeffects.     

The effect of latanoprost on circadian intraocular pressure

The presence of a circadian variation of both intraocular pressure (IOP) and aqueous humor flow has been demonstrated in several studies. It must therefore be considered important to monitor IOP and evaluate the efficacy of ocular hypotensive drugs over the 24 hours of the day. The efficacy of latanoprost on IOP during both day and night has been evaluated and the most important results from four such studies are reviewed. The studies reviewed here clearly demonstrate that topical administration of latanoprost 0.005% once daily provided a steady reduction of the IOP during both day and night. Given as a single dose to healthy volunteers, latanoprost resulted in a sustained effect with a significant IOP reduction over 24 hours, and the reduction was still present, however less pronounced, even after 48 hours. Latanoprost administered once daily for 4 weeks to patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension was more effective in reducing the IOP over 24 hours than timolol gel solution 0.5% once daily, timolol aqueous solution 0.5% twice daily, or dorzolamide 2% three times daily. Latanoprost applied once daily thus provided a better effect on the IOP together with a stable and sustained IOP reduction during both day and night.     

Randomized crossover study of latanoprost and travoprost in eyes with open-angle glaucoma

Introduction  

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of 0.005% latanoprost to that of 0.004% travoprost in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).     

A comparison of latanoprost,bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week,randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study

PURPOSE: To Internet Advance publication at ajo.com Feb 13, 2003. compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect and safety of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). DESIGN: Interventional study. METHODS: This 12-week, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted at 45 US sites. Previously treated patients with OAG or OH and an IOP > or =23 mm Hg in one or both eyes after washout received either latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03%, or travoprost 0.004% once daily in the evening. At baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy, masked evaluators measured IOP in triplicate at 8:00 AM, 12 noon, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM, and masked investigators graded conjunctival hyperemia before the 8:00 AM IOP measurement. The primary efficacy outcome measure was change between baseline and Week 12 in the 8:00 AM IOP (time of peak drug effect). RESULTS: In all, 410 of 411 randomized patients were included in intent-to-treat analyses (latanoprost, 136; bimatoprost, 136; travoprost, 138). Baseline mean 8:00 AM IOP levels were similar (P =.772); by week 12, reductions were observed in all 3 groups (P <.001 for each). Adjusted (ANCOVA) reductions in mean IOP at 8:00 AM were similar (P =.128) as were those at 12 noon, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. Fewer latanoprost-treated patients reported ocular adverse events (P <.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost), fewer reported hyperemia (P =.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost), and average hyperemia scores were lower at week 12 (P =.001, latanoprost vs bimatoprost). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP in OAG and OH patients. Latanoprost exhibited greater ocular tolerability.     

Comparison of the effects of latanoprost and travoprost on intraocular pressure in chronic angle-closure glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and travoprost as primary therapy in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) after peripheral iridotomy. METHODS: Seventy-three (73) CACG patients with IOP>19 mmHg after peripheral iridotomy and without previous antiglaucoma medication were consecutively recruited. CACG was defined as the presence of chronically elevated IOP, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and a corresponding visual field defect in eyes with occludable angle and peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, based on daily treatment with either latanoprost 0.005% or travoprost 0.004% in the evening for 12 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 AM and 4 PM at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Between-group differences in mean diurnal IOP and IOP reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, mean IOP for both the latanoprost and travoprost groups was significantly reduced, when compared to the baseline IOP (from 21.3+/-1.8 mmHg to 16.0+/-2.3 mmHg and 21.7+/-1.7 to 16.7+/-2.2 mmHg; P<0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the 2 treatment groups (P=0.19). At 4 and 8 weeks, the IOP changes from the baseline were statistically significant at all time points for both drugs (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both latanoprost and travoprost significantly reduced IOP in our sample of CACG patients after peripheral iridotomy.     

Comparison of the effects of latanoprost and bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in chronic angle-closure glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and bimatoprost as primary therapy in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) after peripheral iridotomy. METHODS: Eighty-two (82) consecutive CACG patients with an IOP greater than 19 mmHg after a peripheral iridotomy were recruited. CACG was defined as chronic elevated IOP, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and a corresponding visual field defect in eyes with occludable angle and peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups based on daily treatment with either latanoprost 0.005% or bimatoprost 0.03% in the evening for 12 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 AM and 4 PM on the same day at baseline and also at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Between-group differences in mean diurnal IOP and IOP reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, mean IOP for both the latanoprost and bimatoprost groups was significantly reduced when compared to the baseline value (21.6 +/- 1.9 to 16.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg and 22.1 +/- 2.0 to 16.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the two treatment groups (P = 0.40). At 4 and 8 weeks, the IOP changes from baseline were statistically significant at both times for both drugs (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both latanoprost and bimatoprost significantly reduced IOP in CACG patients who were inadequately treated by laser peripheral iridotomy.     

Nimesulide oral administration increases the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of latanoprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To verify the short-term influence of an orally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of primary open-angle glaucoma patients in therapy with a topical prostaglandin analog. DESIGN: Randomized cross-over double-blind study. METHODS: Sixteen adults with primary open-angle glaucoma, receiving 0.005% latanoprost eyedrops once daily, were treated with a single dose of either 100 mg nimesulide or placebo. IOP was recorded at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours. RESULTS: After nimesulide administration, there was a decrease in IOP (with a fall at the second hour, P<.01) that remained significant 8 hours later (P<.05). At 12 and 24 hours, there were unremarkable IOP differences between the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, single-dose nimesulide significantly enhances the latanoprost-induced IOP-lowering effects during the short plasma half-life of this non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.     

Corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy subjects

PURPOSE: To evaluate short-term conjunctival and corneal punctate staining with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in healthy individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centered, active-controlled, three-period crossover comparison that evaluated conjunctival and corneal punctate staining, by grade and individual stains, in healthy subjects after dosing for five days in one eye with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost. Staining was evaluated at 24-hour trough (Hour 0) and at Hour 1 after dosing. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed this study. This study found that there was no significant difference by ANOVA for the number of individual corneal punctate stains either at trough (latanoprost 22.6 +/- 25.4, bimatoprost 16.8 +/- 25.6, and travoprost 21.1 +/- 26.0 mm Hg) (P = 0.33) or at 1 hour after dosing (latanoprost 23.8 +/- 26.3 bimatoprost 18.2 +/- 25.2, and travoprost 26.1 +/- 26.1 mm Hg) (P = 0.75) among treatment groups. No significant differences existed among treatment groups in the study eye compared with the non-study eye or to the study eye at Hour 0 or Hour 1 or to the period initiation or baseline visits (P > 0.05). Several significantly different comparisons, inconsistent in nature, were observed for the nasal and temporal conjunctival staining between the treatment groups. There were no differences in unsolicited or solicited adverse events between groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, in healthy subjects after short-term treatment, latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost demonstrate generally similar ocular surface epithelial staining characteristics.     

原发性开角型青光眼患者及正常人的眼压日内波动趋势

目的研究原发性开角型青光眼（POAG）、正常眼压性青光眼（NTG）患者及正常人双眼眼压昼夜波动趋势及其眼压峰值出现的规律，比较双眼眼压波动趋势是否一致。设计前瞻性病例系列。研究对象POAG、NTG患者及正常对照各30例。方法用Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压日曲线，比较双眼的日眼压波动模式及眼压峰值分布。主要指标眼压测量值。结果眼压峰值出现于非办公时段的正常人为右眼6．7％、左眼10．0％；NTG患者为右眼20．0％、左眼23．3％；POAG患者为右眼23．3％、左眼20.0％。结论POAG、NTG患者和正常人有着不同的眼压昼夜波动模式，且双眼的波动趋势不尽相同，不能完全将双眼等同看待；部分观察对象的峰值眼压分布于非办公时段，办公时段多次眼压测量不能完全代替一日眼压监测。（眼科，2007,16：33．36）     

Effect of bimatoprost on patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are nonresponders to latanoprost

PURPOSE: To test the efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% 2D for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients affected by primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who did not respond to treatment with latanoprost 0.005% 2D. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial with a cross over design (two 30-day treatment phases with a 30-day washout phase in between). PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Random allocation to treatment to a single eye only of every subject. Eligibility criteria: (1) IOP > 22 mmHg in both eyes on current treatment (on three separate readings > 24 hours apart), (2) angle wide open in both eyes, (3) no pseudoexfoliation and/or pigment dispersion in either eye, (4) documented medical history consistent with < 10% IOP decrease in both eyes on 2-month treatment with latanoprost 0.005% every day. METHOD: The following variables were measured at each study visit: (1) IOP (Goldmann applanation tonometry, 5 readings, 8 AM, 12 noon, 4 PM, 8 PM, and 12 midnight); (2) visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution); (3) estimate of conjunctival hyperemia based on 5 standard photographs (graded as "none," "trace," "mild," "moderate," and "severe"). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: IOP. RESULTS: IOP data (mean and standard deviation) were the following: baseline = 24.7 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after washout = 24.8 +/- 1.1 mmHg, after latanoprost phase = 24.1 +/- 0.9 mmHg, after bimatoprost phase = 18.1 +/- 1.7 mmHg. IOP on bimatoprost proved lower than both baseline (P < 0.0001) and latanoprost (P = 0.0001). Thirteen of 15 patients showed a > or =20% IOP decrease with bimatoprost treatment. None of the 15 patients showed a > or =20% decrease of IOP after 30 days of latanoprost treatment. No significant IOP changes were observed in the fellow untreated eye in each patient throughout the study. Trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia was recorded more often with bimatoprost phase (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen of 15 patients, who were nonresponders to latanoprost, 0.005%, 2D, were successfully treated with bimatoprost, 0.03%, 2D. Bimatoprost treatment was associated with a higher incidence of trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia than latanoprost.