Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether and to what extent greater number of projection images obtained at three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) causes overestimation of internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DSA (two or three projections), rotational angiography (16 or 32 projections), and 3D TOF MR angiography (12 projections) were performed in 47 stenotic ICAs of 38 symptomatic patients. Two observers independently measured maximum stenosis, and the mean differences among MR angiography, DSA, and rotational angiography were compared. RESULTS: Three rotational and five MR angiograms were nondiagnostic. Seven MR angiograms of ICA stenoses showed a signal void and were excluded from analysis. On the remaining 32 angiograms, mean differences in maximum stenosis for observers 1 and 2, respectively, were 7% (95% CI: 3%, 12%) and 8% (95% CI: 3%, 13%) at MR angiography versus DSA and 2% (95% CI: -2%, 7%) and -1% (95% CI: -5%, 3%) at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. ICA stenosis was graded significantly higher at MR angiography versus DSA, whereas, it was not overestimated at MR angiography versus rotational angiography. The difference in maximum stenosis at MR angiography versus DSA was significantly different from that of MR angiography versus rotational angiography. CONCLUSION: Apparent overestimation of ICA stenosis at 3D TOF MR angiography versus conventional DSA may be partly explained by the greater number of projection images available at 3D TOF MR angiography.     

Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the reference standard for assessing carotid arteries, it is uncomfortable for patients and has a small risk of disabling stroke and death. These problems have fueled the use of spiral CT angiography and MR angiography. We prospectively compared elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography with conventional DSA for detecting carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Eighty carotid arteries (in 40 symptomatic patients) were assessed. Elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiographic data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reconstruction techniques. All patients had been referred for DSA evaluation on the basis of findings at Doppler sonography, which served as a screening method (degree of stenosis > or = 70% or inconclusive results). Degree of carotid stenosis estimated by using the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: Significant correlation with DSA was found for stenosis degree for both elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiography; however, the correlation coefficient was higher for MR than for CT angiography (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.86). Underestimation of stenoses of 70-99% occurred in one case with elliptic centric MR angiography (a 70% stenosis was underestimated as 65%) and in nine cases with spiral CT angiography, in comparison to DSA findings. Overestimation occurred in two cases with MR angiography (stenoses of 65-67% were overestimated as 70-75%). With CT, overestimation occurred in seven cases; a stenosis of 60% in one case was overestimated as 70%. Both techniques confirmed the three cases of carotid occlusion. With elliptic centric MR angiography, carotid stenoses of 70% or greater were detected with high sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 95.2%; likelihood ratio (LR) for a positive test result, 20.4; and ratio of LR(+) to LR(-), -0.3. With spiral CT angiography, sensitivity, specificity, LR(+), and LR(+):LR(-) were 74.3%, 97.6%, 31.2, and 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more accurate than spiral CT angiography to adequately evaluate carotid stenosis. Furthermore, elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be adequate to replace conventional DSA in most patients examined.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study

A contrast-enhanced, gradient-echo 3D pulse sequence providing angiographic information in 24 s was tested in five healthy subjects and used prospectively in 21 patients for the investigation of the cervical arteries. Indications included suspected stenosis of the carotid (in 13), or vertebral arteries (in 1), carotid dissection (3), variants of the branches of the aortic arch (2) and extracranial carotid aneurysms (2). The results in all patients were compared with those of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In patients with carotid stenosis, they were also compared with high-resolution 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Good quality MR angiograms of the neck vessels were obtained with the fast 3D sequence in 20 of the 21 patients. One claustrophobic patient was unable to co-operate. The degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded correctly (compared to DSA) in 21 of 24 cases (87.5 %). Two mild stenoses were overestimated as moderate using the fast MR sequence and one high-grade stenosis was misdiagnosed as a complete occlusion. Carotid dissection was confirmed in one case and correctly excluded in two. Four extracranial ICA aneurysms in two patients, arterial variants and stenosis of the origin of the vertebral artery were correctly diagnosed using the contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. Three-dimensional TOF MRA was unsuccessful due to motion artefacts in half of the cases of ICA stenosis. Received: 6 August 1998 Accepted: 21 December 1998     

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since 1996, several preliminary studies have shown the usefulness of contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for imaging supraaortic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A blinded comparison of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR angiography with conventional DSA was performed in 120 patients (240 arteries). MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T magnet with gradient overdrive equipment, by using a coronal radiofrequency-spoiled 3D fast low-angle-shot sequence after the intravenous injection of gadodiamide. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis of the internal carotid artery were applied on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and conventional catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Grading of stenoses on MR angiograms agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 89% of arteries. In the severe stenosis group (70-99%), agreement was 93%. All internal carotid occlusions (n = 28) and seven of nine pseudo-occlusions were accurately detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The correlation between MR angiography and DSA for determination of minimal, moderate, and severe stenoses and occlusion was statistically significant (r = 0.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation with a large number of patients confirms that contrast-enhanced MR angiography could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the treatment of patients with carotid artery disease.     

Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine, for both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, the accuracy of subjective visual impression (SVI) in the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, with objective caliper measurements serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethics committee approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. A total of 142 symptomatic patients (41 women, 101 men; mean age, 70 years; age range, 44-89 years) suspected of having ICA stenosis on the basis of Doppler ultrasonographic findings underwent both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With each modality, three independent neuroradiologists who were blinded to other test results first visually estimated and subsequently objectively measured stenoses. Diagnostic accuracy and percentage misclassification for correct categorization of 70%-99% stenosis were calculated for SVI, with objective measurements serving as the reference standard. Interobserver variability was determined with kappa statistics. RESULTS: After exclusion of arteries that were unsuitable for measurement, 180 vessels remained for analysis with DSA and 159 vessels remained for analysis with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. With respect to 70%-99% stenosis, SVI was associated with average misclassification of 8.9% for DSA (8.9%, 7.8%, and 10.0% for readers A, B, and C, respectively) and of 11.7% for contrast-enhanced MR angiography (11.3%, 8.8%, and 15.1% for readers A, B, and C, respectively). Negative predictive values were excellent (92.3%-100%). Interobserver variability was higher for SVI (DSA, kappa = 0.62-0.71; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.57-0.69) than for objective measurements (DSA, kappa = 0.75-0.80; contrast-enhanced MR angiography, kappa = 0.66-0.72). CONCLUSION: SVI alone is not recommended for evaluation of ICA stenosis with both DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. SVI may be acceptable as an initial screening tool to exclude the presence of 70%-99% stenosis, but caliper measurements are warranted to confirm the presence of such stenosis.     

Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for stenosis depiction in malfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts in 48 consecutive patients. Vascular tree of accesses was divided into between three and eight segments depending on access type (AVF or AVG) and length of venous outflow. Images obtained with MR and DSA were interpreted by two MR radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively, who were blinded to information from each other and other studies. DSA was reference standard for stenosis detection. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of contrast-enhanced MR in detection of vascular segments containing hemodynamically significant (> or =50%) stenosis were calculated. Linear-weighted kappa statistic was calculated for contrast-enhanced MR and DSA to determine interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection. RESULTS: A total of 282 vascular segments were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced MR depicted three false-positive stenoses and all but two of 70 significant stenoses depicted with DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MR in detection of vessel segments with significant stenoses were 97% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), 99% (95% CI: 96%, 100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%), and 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%), respectively. MR demonstrated significant stenosis in four of five nondiagnostic DSA segments, whereas DSA showed no significant stenosis in four nondiagnostic MR segments. Linear-weighted kappa statistic for interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) for MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97) for DSA. CONCLUSION: MR angiography depicts stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses but has limited clinical value as result of current inability to perform MR-guided access interventions after stenosis detection. MR of dysfunctional access should be considered only if nondiagnostic vascular segment is present at DSA.     

Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical utility of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography (acquired with derated gradients) as an aid to predicting severe carotid stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our study population was composed of 68 patients, yielding 133 carotid bifurcations for analysis. A 2D time-of-flight MR angiography pulse sequence was modified to provide greater sensitivity for carotid stenosis, which resulted in visualization of a carotid stenosis with a 70% or greater diameter as a signal void. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed with the elliptical centric view order. Multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition (MOTSA) MR angiography was performed in select patients. Digital subtraction angiography was performed in 51 patients, and the findings were used as the gold standard. In the remaining patients, findings on carotid duplex Doppler sonography and at surgery and clinical follow-up were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: In 51 patients for whom a digital subtraction angiogram was available, we found that the sensitivity of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for prediction of carotid stenosis with a 70% or greater diameter was 94%, and the specificity of the technique was 97%. In three patients with severe carotid stenosis, the stenoses that appeared as signal voids on the classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography were underestimated on contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Severe stenosis was confirmed by subsequent digital subtraction angiography, surgical results, or both. Discrepancies between findings on MOTSA MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography were resolved with classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography. Classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography increased diagnostic confidence of a severe stenosis in three patients with focal internal carotid artery stenosis. CONCLUSION: Classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography has a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting carotid bifurcation stenosis of 70% or greater diameter. These probability measures allowed the detection of three significant stenoses that would have been missed on contrast-enhanced MR angiography and provided greater diagnostic confidence than contrast-enhanced or MOTSA MR angiography alone.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients after kidney transplantation

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in detecting postoperative vascular complications after kidney transplantation in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Forty-one patients who underwent a kidney transplantation were examined with MR angiography and DSA. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed as a dynamic measurement with one precontrast and three postcontrast measurements. Maximum intensity projection reconstructions were performed for all postcontrast data sets after DSA. The results were evaluated by two independent observers who were unaware of the DSA results. Twenty-three hemodynamically significant arterial stenoses were identified with DSA in the iliac arteries ( n=7), the renal allograft arteries ( n=12), and in their first branches ( n=4). For a patient-based analysis the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for observer 1 were 100 and 97%, and for observer 2, 100 and 93%. Respective data were 100 and 100% after a consensus evaluation by two observers. Complications involving the renal veins were detected in 2 cases and perfusion defects of the kidney parenchyma were detected in 4 cases. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is a reliable method in identifying postoperative arterial stenoses after kidney transplantation. In addition, dynamic MR angiography can be helpful in detecting venous complications and perfusion defects in kidney allografts.     

Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography are noninvasive, preoperative imaging modalities for evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Innovative techniques and improvements in image quality require frequent reassessment of accuracy, reliability, and diagnostic value compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography compared with DSA for detection of high-grade carotid artery stenoses. METHODS: Four readers, blinded to clinical symptoms and the outcome of other studies, independently evaluated stenoses on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms in 71 vessels of 39 symptomatic patients. Duplex sonography was also performed in all vessels. The severity of stenosis was defined according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria (0-29%, 30-69%, 70-99%, 100%). Results of both modalities were compared with the corresponding DSA findings. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% and 79.1%, respectively, for the identification of carotid artery stenoses of 70% or greater. Sensitivity and specificity of duplex sonography were 92.9% and 81.9%, respectively. Combining data from both tests revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 81.4%, respectively, for concordant results (80% of vessels). CONCLUSION: Concordant results of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography increase the diagnostic sensitivity to 100%. The reliability of MR angiography is comparable to that of DSA. The combination of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography might be preferable over DSA for preoperative evaluation in most patients, thus reducing the risk of perioperative morbidity and improving the overall outcome.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced fast three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in depicting both the carotid and vertebral arteries in their cervical portions and to compare MR angiography with conventional angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic disease.METHODSTwenty-seven patients with ischemic cerebral events in the anterior (n = 18) and posterior (n = 9) circulation underwent contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the coronal plane. MR angiograms were examined in a blinded fashion by two observers independently. Stenosis was classified according to the appearance of the residual lumen (no stenosis, mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, severe stenosis, occlusion). Conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference.RESULTSProximal great vessels and carotid siphons were not assessable on MR angiograms in 35% of cases owing to limited coverage. All cervical and petrous segments of the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and 93% of the extracranial vertebral arteries were assessable. Flow-related artifacts were observed in seven cases of severe stenosis, including three with signal void at the site of narrowing and four with signal loss in the distal ICA. Interobserver agreement was good and significant. Overall agreement between 3D MR angiography and conventional angiography was good for the anterior and posterior circulations despite a tendency toward overestimation of stenoses on MR angiograms. Clinically relevant stenoses and occlusions were correctly identified on 3D MR angiograms, providing good sensitivity and specificity.CONCLUSIONContrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography is a promising tool for assessing arteriosclerotic lesions of supraaortic vessels. Further studies with larger groups are required to determine its value for patient care.     

MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare Gd-enhanced breath-hold fast imaging with steady-state precession (Gd-FISP) with unenhanced time-of-flight (TOF) sequences in evaluating internal carotid arteries (ICAs). METHOD: Thirty patients underwent three unenhanced TOF sequences [2D traveling saturation (Travelsat); 3D tilted optimized nonsaturated excitation (TONE); TOF 3D Multislab] and two breath-hold 3D Gd-FISP sequences with automated intravenous contrast agent injection (axial and coronal). ICAs were classified as normal (no stenosis); with mild (<30%), moderate (30-70%), or severe stenosis; or occluded (100%). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with aortic arch injection was used as a reference technique. RESULTS: DSA revealed 20 normal ICAs; 11 mild, 9 moderate, and 14 severe stenoses; and 2 occlusions. DSA and all MR angiography (MRA) sequences diagnosed the occlusion of four common carotid arteries. The TOF 2D overestimated 10 stenoses, TOF 3D TONE 9, and TOF 3D Multislab 5; Gd-FISP 3D overestimated only 2 of them, reaching the highest sensitivity and specificity for severe stenoses. Significant differences were found between the overestimation of Gd-FISP and each of the three unenhanced sequences (0.0020 < p < 0.0313, Wilcoxon and McNemar tests). Severe artifacts were observed with TOF techniques only. CONCLUSION: Gd-FISP is an interesting, largely artifact-free improvement for MRA of ICAs.     

Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis

PURPOSE: To assess accuracy of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography as compared with three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography and reference digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 consecutive patients suspected of having carotid artery stenosis at duplex ultrasonography. Stenoses were measured by two independent observers blinded to clinical information and other test results. Pearson correlation coefficients were used, and kappa for interobserver variabilities was estimated. Sensitivity and specificity of enhanced and 3D TOF MR angiography were calculated and compared with those of DSA. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.94 (P <.01) for enhanced angiography versus DSA, 0.92 (P <.01) for 3D TOF angiography versus DSA, and 0.93 (P <.01) for enhanced versus 3D TOF angiography for observer 1 and 0.94 (P <.01), 0.95 (P <.01), and 0.94 (P <.01), respectively, for observer 2. kappa statistics were 0.81 for enhanced angiography, 0.79 for 3D TOF angiography, and 0.78 for DSA. Stenosis measurements of observer 1 at enhanced MR angiography, with inclusion of carotid arteries on the symptomatic side only, compared with those of DSA yielded a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%). 3D TOF angiography yielded a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI: 67%, 97%) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 50%, 89%) compared with those of DSA. For observer 2, sensitivity and specificity for enhanced angiography were 91% (95% CI: 70%, 99%) and 76% (95% CI: 52%, 91%), respectively, and 90% (95% CI: 68%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 51%, 92%), respectively, for 3D TOF angiography. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of enhanced MR angiography in diagnosis of severe stenosis is similar to that of 3D TOF MR angiography.     

3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值

目的：探讨3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值。方法：对43例临床疑诊颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的患者行2D TOF MRA和3D TRICKS MRA检查,其中31例同期行DSA检查,以颈总动脉法（CC法）计算狭窄率。结果：颈动脉闭塞2支,重度狭窄10支,中度狭窄31支,轻度狭窄25支,正常18支。2D TOF MRA、3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对照,显示狭窄部位均与DSA所示相符。2D TOF MRA高估狭窄程度6支,3D TRICKS MRA高估狭窄程度1支。以DSA为标准,2D TOF MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为91.6%,85.7%,90.3%（K=0.737）;3D TRICKS MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为97.9%,100%,98.4%（K=0.955）。两种方法对诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对评估颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄具有极好的一致性（K=0.955）,明显优于2D TOF MRA（K=0.737,P〈0.05）,是对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄筛查、术前评估、术后随访的最佳检查方法,能基本替代DSA检查。     

Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate use of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in the assessment of suspected arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving kidney transplants (26 single-kidney transplants and two en block transplants) with suspected arterial inflow stenosis were examined with two MR angiography sequences: gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) imaging and 3D phase-contrast imaging. Twenty-four of these patients then were examined using the gold standards: either digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 23) or surgery (n = 1). MR angiography and DSA studies were independently and prospectively analyzed for the presence of arterial stenoses (mild [<50%], severe [50-90%], or critical [>90%]) in the iliac, anastomotic, and renal artery segments. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the MR angiography sequences for ability to detect or exclude significant (> or = 50%) arterial stenoses. RESULTS: In 22 single-kidney transplants, DSA showed eight significant stenoses in 66 arterial segments. MR angiograms adequately showed 66 of 66 segments (prospective observers) and 64 of 66 segments (each retrospective observer), which were subsequently evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography in revealing significant stenoses were 100% and 98% (prospective analysis), 88% and 98% (retrospective observer 1), and 86% and 100% (retrospective observer 2). Concordance between observers showed kappa values exceeding .85 for all comparisons except the analysis of phase-contrast series (kappa = .62). In one en block transplant, DSA showed that stenosis was greater than 90%, although it had been graded at less than 50% with MR angiography. CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography accurately evaluated arterial inflow in single-kidney transplants.     

Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view

PURPOSE: To prospectively use 3.0-T breath-hold high-spatial-resolution contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with highly accelerated parallel acquisition to image the supraaortic arteries of patients suspected of having arterial occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty patients (44 men, 36 women; age range, 44-90 years) underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 T with an eight-channel neurovascular array coil. By applying a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition algorithm with an acceleration factor of four, high-spatial-resolution (0.7 x 0.7 x 0.9 mm = 0.44-mm(3) voxels) three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed during a 20-second breath hold. Two neuroradiologists evaluated vascular image quality and arterial stenoses. Interobserver variability was tested with the kappa coefficient. Quantitation of stenosis at MR angiography was compared with that at digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 13) and computed tomographic (CT) angiography (n = 12) with Spearman rank correlation coefficient (R(s)). RESULTS: Arterial stenoses were detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography in 208 (reader 1) and 218 (reader 2) segments, with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.80). There was a significant correlation between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography (R(s) = 0.95, reader 1; R(s) = 0.87, reader 2) and between contrast-enhanced MR angiography and DSA (R(s) = 0.94, reader 1; R(s) = 0.92, reader 2) for the degree of stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for detection of arterial stenoses greater than 50% were 94% and 98% for reader 1 and 100% and 98% for reader 2, with DSA as the standard of reference. Vascular image quality was sufficient for diagnosis or excellent for 97% of arterial segments evaluated. CONCLUSION: By using highly accelerated parallel acquisition, the described 3.0-T contrast-enhanced MR angiographic protocol enabled visualization and characterization of the majority of supraaortic arteries, with diagnostic or excellent image quality (97% of arterial segments) and diagnostic values comparable with those obtained by using CT angiography and DSA for detection of arterial stenoses.     

The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study

We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the identification of recently ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We studied 23 aneurysms in 18 patients (age range 34–72 years) with aneurysms of the anterior (n=17) and posterior (n=6) circulation by comparing 3D time-of-flight (TOF), contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In four of 23 aneurysms, 3D-TOF did not show the lesion. Contrast-enhanced MRA successfully depicted all aneurysms except one. T1 contamination artefacts from subarachnoid or intraparenchymal haemorrhages were evident on the 3D-TOF images in six cases. The artefacts were completely eliminated on the contrast-enhanced MRA images by subtraction of the pre-contrast images. The diagnostic information in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhages (SAHs) provided by contrast-enhanced MRA was comparable to that provided by DSA.The contents of this article were presented as a poster entitled Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms at the 28th annual meeting of the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), Istanbul, Turkey, 11–14 September 2003     

Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with that of conventional angiography for imaging the lower extremity vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who were evaluated for possible surgical intervention underwent conventional angiography (ie, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ie, time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics [TRICKS]). Two independent, blinded readers evaluated vessel stenosis and occlusion at DSA and MR angiographic image readings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The Cohen kappa test was performed to examine interreader variability. RESULTS: At pooled readings, contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 98% for detection of occlusion. For detection of significant stenosis (at least one > or = 50% stenosis), sensitivity and specificity were 77% and 91%, respectively. Interreader agreement was high for detection of both occlusion (kappa = 0.76) and significant stenosis (kappa = 0.68). Sensitivity increased as MR angiographic technical parameters were optimized. When improvements resulting from coil type and injection protocol were considered, the sensitivity and specificity of TRICKS MR angiography were 89% and 97%, respectively, for occlusion detection and 87% and 90%, respectively, for significant stenosis detection. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced TRICKS MR angiography is a feasible and minimally invasive means of acquiring angiograms of the peripheral vasculature with high sensitivity and specificity.     

Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of duplex ultrasound (US) and MR angiography (MRA) at 1.0 T in aortoiliac arterial disease using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. In addition, a comparison of the 2D time-of flight (TOF) and 3D contrast-enhanced MRA (CE MRA) techniques was performed.Material and Methods: Prospectively, 39 patients with symptoms of lower-extremity arterial occlusive disease were examined using US, TOF MRA, CE MRA and DSA. Significant lesions (stenosis ≥50%) and occlusions were evaluated blindly for each method.Results: For all segments, the sensitivity for US, TOF MRA and CE MRA with regard to significant lesions was 0.72, 0.81 and 0.81, respectively, and the specificity for each was 0.97, 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. For significant lesions above the inguinal ligament the corresponding sensitivity was 0.84, 0.89 and 0.94 and the specificity 0.93, 0.82 and 0.73, respectively. The specificity was higher when the two MRA methods were combined. TOF MRA overgraded 7 segments as occluded. In most cases, the length of the occlusions was correctly determined on CE MRA, overestimated on TOF MRA and uncertain on US.Conclusion: Neither US nor MRA were sufficiently accurate to fully replace angiography. MRA was preferable to US as a non-invasive test when vascular intervention was contemplated. Although CE MRA was superior to TOF MRA, the most accurate results were achieved when the two methods were combined.     

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts

The aim of this study was to determine the potential of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) served as a standard of reference. Thirty-five patients with previous bypass graft surgery underwent DSA and contrast-enhanced MR angiography within 2 weeks. MR angiography was performed using a three-dimensional fast gradient-echo sequence after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Every leg was divided into 11 segments and scored in five categories of stenosis. MR angiography findings were compared with those of DSA. A total of 38 bypass grafts and 454 segments in 27 patients were included in the evaluation. In 33 (87 %) bypass grafts stenosis grading with both methods corresponded, and in 5 (13 %) cases stenosis was overestimated on MR angiography. Agreement in detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis (stenosis = 50 %) was 94.7 % with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 91.3 %. In 340 (83.0 %) vascular segments there was conformity in graduation, in 69 (16.88 %), there was a difference of one or more grades on MR angiograms. Forty-four segments (9.6 %) were not assessable due to technical limitations. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is an useful noninvasive tool in the detection of failing peripheral vascular bypass grafts. Received: 6 July 1999; Revised: 12 November 1999; Accepted: 4 January 2000     

Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) provides excellent visualization of the intracranial vasculature, it has several limitations. Our purpose was to evaluate the ability of helical CT angiography (CTA) to help detect and quantify intracranial stenosis and occlusion compared with DSA and MR angiography (MRA). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent CTA, DSA, and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MRA for suspected cerebrovascular lesions. All three studies were performed within a 30-day period. Two readers blinded to prior estimated or calculated stenoses, patient history and clinical information examined 672 vessel segments. Lesions were categorized as normal (0-9%), mild (10-29%), moderate (30-69%), severe (70-99%), or occluded (no flow detected). DSA was the reference standard. Unblinded consensus readings were obtained for all discrepancies. RESULTS: A total of 115 diseased vessel segments were identified. After consensus interpretation, CTA revealed higher sensitivity than that of MRA for intracranial stenosis (98% versus 70%, P < .001) and occlusion (100% versus 87%, P = .02). CTA had a higher positive predictive value than that of MRA for both stenosis (93% versus 65%, P < .001) and occlusion (100% versus 59%, P < .001). CTA had a high interoperator reliability. In 6 of 28 patients (21%), all 6 with low-flow states in the posterior circulation, CTA was superior to DSA in detection of vessel patency. CONCLUSION: CTA has a higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than MRA and is recommended over TOF MRA for detection of intracranial stenosis and occlusion. CTA has a high interoperator reliability. CTA is superior to DSA in the evaluation of posterior circulation steno-occlusive disease when slow flow is present. CTA results had a significant effect on patient clinical management.