Morphine, oxycodone, methadone and its enantiomers in different models of nociception in the rat

We studied the effects of the commonly used mu-opioid receptor agonists morphine, oxycodone, methadone and the enantiomers of methadone in thermal and mechanical models of acute pain and in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rats. Subcutaneous administration of morphine, oxycodone, and methadone produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the tail flick, hotplate, and paw pressure tests. l-methadone, racemic methadone, and oxycodone had a similar dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, whereas the dose-response curve of morphine was shallower. In the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, subcutaneous administration of morphine, oxycodone, methadone and l-methadone had antiallodynic effects in tests of mechanical and cold allodynia. l-methadone showed the strongest antiallodynic effect of the tested drugs. d-methadone was inactive in all tests. Morphine 5.0 mg/kg, oxycodone 2.5 mg/kg, and l-methadone 1.25 mg/kg decreased spontaneous locomotion 30 min after drug administration. In conclusion, in acute nociception all mu-opioid receptor agonists produced antinociception, with morphine showing the weakest effect. In nerve injury pain, l-methadone showed the greatest antiallodynic potency in both mechanical and cold allodynia compared with the other opioids. Opioids seem to have different profiles in different pain models. l-methadone should be studied for neuropathic pain in humans.     

A study of the analgesic interaction between intrathecal morphine and subcutaneous nalbuphine in the rat

Nalbuphine reverses opioid-induced respiratory depression, but the effect on analgesia is unclear. The analgesic interaction between subcutaneous (sc) nalbuphine and intrathecal morphine in conscious, male, Sprague-Dawley rats implanted with chronic intrathecal catheters was investigated. Nalbuphine (10 mg/kg) injected 30 min after intrathecal morphine (4 micrograms) significantly antagonized the effect of morphine in the tail flick test. The antagonism was rapid in onset and persisted beyond the experimental period of 240 min. The magnitude and the duration of the effect were comparable to that observed with sc naloxone (1 mg/kg). In contrast to the results in the tail flick test, nalbuphine enhanced the effect of intrathecal morphine in the noninflamed paw pressure test. Nalbuphine (10 mg/kg) alone had no effect on the time course of tail flick latency but significantly increased paw pressure threshold during the 15-90 min interval after sc injection. Nalbuphine (0.5 mg/kg, sc) alone had no antinociceptive effect in either pain test and did not antagonize the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine (4 micrograms) in the tail flick test. However, sc nalbuphine (0.5 mg/kg), injected 30 min after intrathecal morphine (1.5 micrograms), significantly enhanced the effect of morphine in the paw pressure test compared with intrathecal morphine + sc saline-treated rats. The results indicate a complex analgesic interaction between intrathecal morphine and sc nalbuphine. The net analgesic effect during the interaction was determined by the following: 1) the doses of morphine and nalbuphine; 2) the time after nalbuphine administration; and 3) the nature of the nociceptive stimulus. At lower doses, sc nalbuphine appeared to potentiate the effect of intrathecal morphine in the noninflamed paw pressure test.     

Effects of radolmidine, a novel alpha2 -adrenergic agonist compared with dexmedetomidine in different pain models in the rat

BACKGROUND: Intrathecally administered alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists produce effective antinociception, but sedation is an important adverse effect. Radolmidine is a novel alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist with a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with the well-researched dexmedetomidine. This study determined the antinociceptive and sedative effects of radolmidine in different models of acute and chronic pain. Dexmedetomidine and saline served as controls. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were studied in acute pain (tail flick), carrageenan inflammation, and the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia was assessed with von Frey filaments, cold allodynia with the acetone test, and thermal hyperalgesia with the paw flick test. Locomotor activity-vigilance was assessed in a dark field. Dexmedetomidine and radolmidine were administered intrathecally in doses of 0.25 microg, 2.5 microg, 5 microg, and 10 microg. RESULTS: In the tail flick test, radolmidine showed a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, being equipotent compared with dexmedetomidine. In carrageenan inflammation, intrathecal doses of 2.5 microg or 5 microg of dexmedetomidine/radolmidine produced significant antinociception compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equianalgesic. In the neuropathic pain model, an intrathecal dose of 5 microg dexmedetomidine-radolmidine had a significant antiallodynic effect compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equipotent. Intrathecal administration of both dexmedetomidine and radolmidine dose dependently decreased spontaneous locomotor acitivity-vigilance, but this effect was significantly smaller after intrathecal administration of radolmidine than after intrathecal dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Radolmidine and dexmedetomidine had equipotent antinociceptive effects in all tests studied. However, radolmidine caused significantly less sedation than dexmedetomidine, probably because of a different pharmacokinetic profile.     

Effects of Radolmidine, A Novel α2-Adrenergic Agonist Compared with Dexmedetomidine in Different Pain Models in the Rat

Background: Intrathecally administered [alpha]2-adrenoceptor agonists produce effective antinociception, but sedation is an important adverse effect. Radolmidine is a novel [alpha]2-adrenoceptor agonist with a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with the well-researched dexmedetomidine. This study determined the antinociceptive and sedative effects of radolmidine in different models of acute and chronic pain. Dexmedetomidine and saline served as controls.

Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were studied in acute pain (tail flick), carrageenan inflammation, and the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia was assessed with von Frey filaments, cold allodynia with the acetone test, and thermal hyperalgesia with the paw flick test. Locomotor activity-vigilance was assessed in a dark field. Dexmedetomidine and radolmidine were administered intrathecally in doses of 0.25 [mu]g, 2.5 [mu]g, 5 [mu]g, and 10 [mu]g.

Results: In the tail flick test, radolmidine showed a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, being equipotent compared with dexmedetomidine. In carrageenan inflammation, intrathecal doses of 2.5 [mu]g or 5 [mu]g of dexmedetomidine/radolmidine produced significant antinociception compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equianalgesic. In the neuropathic pain model, an intrathecal dose of 5 [mu]g dexmedetomidine-radolmidine had a significant antiallodynic effect compared with saline (P < 0.01). The two drugs were equipotent. Intrathecal administration of both dexmedetomidine and radolmidine dose dependently decreased spontaneous locomotor acitivity-vigilance, but this effect was significantly smaller after intrathecal administration of radolmidine than after intrathecal dexmedetomidine.     

Morphine can enhance the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal R-PIA in rats with nerve ligation injury

Nerve ligation injury may produce a tactile allodynia. Intrathecal adenosine receptor agonists or morphine have an antiallodynic effect. In this study, we examined the effect of intrathecal morphine on the antiallodynic state induced by the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA), in a rat model of nerve ligation injury. Rats were prepared with ligation of left L5-6 spinal nerves and intrathecal catheter implantation. Tactile allodynia was measured by applying von Frey filaments to the lesioned hindpaw. Thresholds for withdrawal response were assessed. Morphine and R-PIA were administered to obtain the dose-response curve and the 50% effective dose (ED(50)). Fractions of ED(50)s were administered concurrently to establish the ED(50) of the drug combination. The drug interaction was analyzed using the isobolographic method. Intrathecal 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), an A1 receptor antagonist, and naloxone were administered to examine the reversal of the antiallodynic effect. Side effects were also observed. Intrathecal morphine and R-PIA and their combination produced a dose-dependent antagonism without severe side effects. Intrathecal morphine synergistically enhanced the antiallodynic effect of R-PIA when coadministered. Intrathecal naloxone and DPCPX reversed the maximal antiallodynic effect in the combination group. These results suggest that activation of mu-opioid and A1 receptors at the spinal level is required for the synergistic interaction on tactile allodynia.     

Interaction between the Spinal Melanocortin and Opioid Systems in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain

Background: The authors recently demonstrated that administration of the melanocortin-4 receptor antagonist SHU9119 decreased neuropathic pain symptoms in rats with a sciatic chronic constriction injury. The authors hypothesised that there is a balance between tonic pronociceptive effects of the spinal melanocortin system and tonic antinociceptive effects of the spinal opioid system. Therefore, they investigated a possible interaction between these two systems and tested whether opioid effectiveness could be increased through modulation of the spinal melanocortin system activity.

Methods: In chronic constriction injury rats, melanocortin and opioid receptor ligands were administered through a lumbar spinal catheter, and their effects on mechanical allodynia were assessed by von Frey probing.

Results: Naloxone (10-100 [mu]g) dose-dependently increased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of -67 +/- 9%), which is in agreement with a tonic antinociceptive effect of the opioid system. SHU9119 decreased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of 60 +/- 13%), and this effect could be blocked by a low dose of naloxone (0.1 [mu]g), which by itself had no effect on withdrawal thresholds. Morphine (1-10 [mu]g) dose-dependently decreased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of 73 +/- 14% with the highest dose tested). When 0.5 [mu]g SHU9119 (percent of maximum possible effect of 47 +/- 14%) was given 15 min before morphine, there was an additive antiallodynic effect of both compounds.     

Differential behavioral effects of peripheral and systemic morphine and naloxone in a rat model of repeated acute inflammation

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that opioid antinociceptive effects are enhanced in animal models of inflammation, but it remains unclear whether this sensitization to morphine is related to predominant central or peripheral increased effects. METHODS: The authors compared the behavioral effects of intraplantar and intravenous morphine and naloxone in a rat model of repeated acute carrageenan-induced inflammation in which enhanced responses to noxious stimuli result from sensitization in peripheral tissues or central sensitization. The antinociceptive effects of intraplantar morphine (50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 microg), intravenous morphine (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mg/kg), and the pronociceptive effects of intraplantar naloxone methiodide (150 microg) and intravenous naloxone (1 mg/kg) against noxious pressure (vocalization thresholds to paw pressure) in rats were assessed 3 h after one or two carrageenan plantar injections performed 7 days apart. RESULTS: After the first carrageenan injection, intraplantar and intravenous morphine produced significant increase of vocalization thresholds to paw pressure in inflamed but not in noninflamed paws. After the second carrageenan injection, the antinociceptive effects of intraplantar morphine were significantly reduced compared with those obtained after the first carrageenan injection, whereas effects of intravenous morphine were significantly enhanced and present in both hind paws. Intravenous naloxone demonstrated similar pronociceptive patterns after the first and second carrageenan injection. Intraplantar naloxone methiodide produced pronociceptive effects in inflamed hind paw that were significantly enhanced after the second carrageenan injection. CONCLUSIONS: When inflammation is enhanced by recurrent stimulations, the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine are enhanced. This increase is more likely related to central than peripheral sites of action, beyond endogenous opioid system activation.     

The monoamine-mediated antiallodynic effects of intrathecally administered milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Antidepressants are often used to treat neuropathic pain. In the present study, we determined the antiallodynic effects of selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors in the spinal cord in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia was produced by tight ligation of the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves and determined by applying von Frey filaments to the left hindpaw. A serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, milnacipran, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, or a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, maprotiline, was administered intrathecally via a chronically implanted catheter. Milnacipran produced dose-dependent antiallodynic effects at doses between 3 microg and 100 microg. The effect lasted for 7 h after injection of 100 microg (P < 0.05). The antiallodynic effect of 30 microg of milnacipran was attenuated by intrathecal coadministration of 30 microg of yohimbine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, 30 microg of methysergide, a serotonin receptor antagonist, or 30 microg of atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist (P < 0.01, respectively). Intraperitoneal administration of milnacipran had no antiallodynic effects at doses of 3 to 30 mg/kg. Antiallodynic effects were not produced by intrathecal administration of paroxetine (10 to 100 microg) or maprotiline (10 to 100 microg). These findings suggest that simultaneous inhibition of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake in the spinal cord is essential to mediate antiallodynic effects. Milnacipran might be effective for suppression of neuropathic pain.     

Differential Behavioral Effects of Peripheral and Systemic Morphine and Naloxone in a Rat Model of Repeated Acute Inflammation

Background: It has been reported that opioid antinociceptive effects are enhanced in animal models of inflammation, but it remains unclear whether this sensitization to morphine is related to predominant central or peripheral increased effects.

Methods: The authors compared the behavioral effects of intraplantar and intravenous morphine and naloxone in a rat model of repeated acute carrageenan-induced inflammation in which enhanced responses to noxious stimuli result from sensitization in peripheral tissues or central sensitization. The antinociceptive effects of intraplantar morphine (50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 [mu]g), intravenous morphine (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mg/kg), and the pronociceptive effects of intraplantar naloxone methiodide (150 [mu]g) and intravenous naloxone (1 mg/kg) against noxious pressure (vocalization thresholds to paw pressure) in rats were assessed 3 h after one or two carrageenan plantar injections performed 7 days apart.

Results: After the first carrageenan injection, intraplantar and intravenous morphine produced significant increase of vocalization thresholds to paw pressure in inflamed but not in noninflamed paws. After the second carrageenan injection, the antinociceptive effects of intraplantar morphine were significantly reduced compared with those obtained after the first carrageenan injection, whereas effects of intravenous morphine were significantly enhanced and present in both hind paws. Intravenous naloxone demonstrated similar pronociceptive patterns after the first and second carrageenan injection. Intraplantar naloxone methiodide produced pronociceptive effects in inflamed hind paw that were significantly enhanced after the second carrageenan injection.     

Interaction between the spinal melanocortin and opioid systems in a rat model of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND: The authors recently demonstrated that administration of the melanocortin-4 receptor antagonist SHU9119 decreased neuropathic pain symptoms in rats with a sciatic chronic constriction injury. The authors hypothesised that there is a balance between tonic pronociceptive effects of the spinal melanocortin system and tonic antinociceptive effects of the spinal opioid system. Therefore, they investigated a possible interaction between these two systems and tested whether opioid effectiveness could be increased through modulation of the spinal melanocortin system activity. METHODS: In chronic constriction injury rats, melanocortin and opioid receptor ligands were administered through a lumbar spinal catheter, and their effects on mechanical allodynia were assessed by von Frey probing. RESULTS: Naloxone (10-100 microg) dose-dependently increased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of -67 +/- 9%), which is in agreement with a tonic antinociceptive effect of the opioid system. SHU9119 decreased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of 60 +/- 13%), and this effect could be blocked by a low dose of naloxone (0.1 microg), which by itself had no effect on withdrawal thresholds. Morphine (1-10 microg) dose-dependently decreased allodynia (percent of maximum possible effect of 73 +/- 14% with the highest dose tested). When 0.5 microg SHU9119 (percent of maximum possible effect of 47 +/- 14%) was given 15 min before morphine, there was an additive antiallodynic effect of both compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data confirm that there is an interaction between the spinal melanocortin and opioid systems and that combined treatment with melanocortin-4 receptor antagonists and opioids might possibly contribute to the treatment of neuropathic pain.     

Interaction of intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine and lidocaine in the rat.

The interaction in the rat between intrathecal morphine and local anesthetics (bupivacaine and lidocaine) on nociception (52.5 degrees C hot plate and paw pressure), motor function, and autonomic function (blood pressure [BP] and heart rate [HR]) was examined over a range of doses for both morphine and the local anesthetics. High doses of intrathecal bupivacaine (75 micrograms) or lidocaine (500 micrograms) produced motor block and hypotension (150 micrograms bupivacaine) lasting approximately 15 and 7 min, respectively, whereas low doses of intrathecal bupivacaine (25 micrograms) and lidocaine (100 micrograms) produced only a transient motor weakness lasting 2 min or less. Alone, neither agent altered the hot plate or paw pressure response at doses, or at times, where the agents had no effect upon motor function. In contrast, at the low dose of either local anesthetic, after the resolution of the transient motor weakness, these doses resulted in a significant leftward shift in the dose-response curves for intrathecal morphine on both the hot plate and paw pressure, as measured by the maximum observed peak effect and by the area under the time-effect curve. Thus, for example, the morphine ED50 (95% confidence intervals) for morphine/saline was 1.7 micrograms (0.7-1.9) on the hot plate and 1.1 micrograms (0.8-1.4) on the paw pressure versus for morphine/bupivacaine (25 micrograms): hot plate 0.25 micrograms (0.21-0.42) and paw pressure 0.28 micrograms (0.2-0.4). Intrathecal morphine was not observed to have any effect on the dose-dependent effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on motor or autonomic blockade. Comparable results were also observed with lidocaine (bupivacaine was found to have no significant effect on spinal cord morphine clearance). We conclude that low doses of intrathecal lidocaine and bupivacaine, which alone have no antinociceptive effect, at times when motor function was clearly unimpaired, are able to significantly augment the antinociceptive activity of intrathecal morphine on the hot plate and paw pressure tests. This prominent and selective potentiation appears to occur via a non-pharmacokinetic mechanism and probably reflects upon the interaction of low concentrations of local anesthetics with systems in the spinal dorsal horn that process acute high threshold afferent input.     

Magnesium chloride and ruthenium red attenuate the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal gabapentin in a rat model of postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin, a gamma-aminobutyric acid analog anticonvulsant, has been shown to possess antinociceptive effects in animal models and clinical trials. An endogenous binding site of [3H]gabapentin has been revealed to be the alpha(2)delta subunit of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, and spermine have been shown to modulate [3H]gabapentin binding to this binding site in vitro. In this study, the authors examined whether intrathecal magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, or spermine could affect the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal gabapentin in a rat model of postoperative pain. METHODS: Under isoflurane anesthesia, male Sprague-Dawley rats received an incision over the plantar surface of the right hind paw to produce punctate mechanical allodynia. Withdrawal thresholds to von Frey filament stimulation near the incision site were measured before incision, 2 h after incision, and every 30 min after intrathecal coadministration of gabapentin with normal saline or different doses of magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, or spermine for 2 h. RESULTS: Intrathecal gabapentin (30, 100, 200 microg) dose-dependently reduced incision-induced allodynia. Hexahydrated magnesium chloride (5, 10, 20 microg) and ruthenium red (0.2, 2, 20 ng) noncompetitively inhibited the antiallodynic effect of gabapentin. Spermine at doses not inducing motor weakness (30, 60 microg) did not affect the antiallodynic effect of gabapentin. The antiallodynic effect of intrathecal morphine (1.5 microg) was not affected by hexahydrated magnesium chloride (20 microg), ruthenium red (20 ng), or spermine (60 microg). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide behavioral evidence to support that the alpha(2)delta subunit of Ca2+ channels may be involved in the antiallodynic action of intrathecal gabapentin in the postoperative pain model.     

Nerve injury induces a tonic bilateral mu-opioid receptor-mediated inhibitory effect on mechanical allodynia in mice

BACKGROUND: Mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor gene have been used to characterize the role of mu-opioid receptors in nociception and the analgesic actions of opioid agonists. In this study, the authors determined the role of mu-opioid receptors in neuropathic pain behaviors and the effectiveness of mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on this behavior in mice. METHODS: The authors studied the behavioral responses of mu-opioid receptor knockout and wild-type mice to thermal and mechanical stimuli before and after neuropathic pain induced by unilateral ligation and section of the L5 spinal nerve. Response to mechanical stimuli was evaluated by determining the frequency of hind paw withdrawal to repetitive stimulation using a series of von Frey monofilaments. Thermal hyperalgesia was assessed by determining the paw withdrawal latencies to radiant heat and frequency of hind paw withdrawal to cooling stimuli. The effects of systemic morphine, the kappa-opioid agonist U50488H, and naloxone on responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli were also studied in spinal nerve-injured mice. RESULTS: After spinal nerve injury, wild-type mice developed increased responsiveness to mechanical, heat, and cooling stimuli ipsilateral to nerve injury. mu-Opioid receptor knockout mice not only had more prominent mechanical allodynia in the nerve-injured paw, but also expressed contralateral allodynia to mechanical stimuli. Hyperalgesia to thermal stimuli was similar between mu-opioid knockout and wild-type animals. Morphine decreased mechanical allodynia dose dependently (3-30 mg/kg subcutaneous) in wild-type mice--an effect that was attenuated in the heterozygous mice and absent in the homozygous mu-opioid knockout mice. The kappa-opioid agonist U50488H (3-10 mg/kg subcutaneous) attenuated mechanical allodynia in wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mu-opioid mice. Naloxone in wild-type mice resulted in enhanced ipsilateral and contralateral allodynia to mechanical stimuli that resembled the pain behavior observed in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' observations indicate that (1) unilateral nerve injury induces a bilateral tonic activation of endogenous mu-opioid receptor-mediated inhibition that attenuates mechanical allodynia but not thermal hyperalgesia, (2) both mu- and kappa-opioid agonists attenuate neuropathic pain in mice, and (3) the antihyperalgesic actions of morphine are mediated primarily via mu-opioid receptors.     

Magnesium Chloride and Ruthenium Red Attenuate the Antiallodynic Effect of Intrathecal Gabapentin in a Rat Model of Postoperative Pain

Background: Gabapentin, a [gamma]-aminobutyric acid analog anticonvulsant, has been shown to possess antinociceptive effects in animal models and clinical trials. An endogenous binding site of [3H]gabapentin has been revealed to be the [alpha]2[delta] subunit of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, and spermine have been shown to modulate [3H]gabapentin binding to this binding site in vitro. In this study, the authors examined whether intrathecal magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, or spermine could affect the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal gabapentin in a rat model of postoperative pain.

Methods: Under isoflurane anesthesia, male Sprague-Dawley rats received an incision over the plantar surface of the right hind paw to produce punctate mechanical allodynia. Withdrawal thresholds to von Frey filament stimulation near the incision site were measured before incision, 2 h after incision, and every 30 min after intrathecal coadministration of gabapentin with normal saline or different doses of magnesium chloride, ruthenium red, or spermine for 2 h.

Results: Intrathecal gabapentin (30, 100, 200 [mu]g) dose-dependently reduced incision-induced allodynia. Hexahydrated magnesium chloride (5, 10, 20 [mu]g) and ruthenium red (0.2, 2, 20 ng) noncompetitively inhibited the antiallodynic effect of gabapentin. Spermine at doses not inducing motor weakness (30, 60 [mu]g) did not affect the antiallodynic effect of gabapentin. The antiallodynic effect of intrathecal morphine (1.5 [mu]g) was not affected by hexahydrated magnesium chloride (20 [mu]g), ruthenium red (20 ng), or spermine (60 [mu]g).     

Spinal endogenous acetylcholine contributes to the analgesic effect of systemic morphine in rats

BACKGROUND: Systemic morphine is known to cause increased release of acetyicholine in the spinal cord. Intrathecal injection of the cholinergic receptor agonists or acetyicholinesterase inhibitors produces antinociception in both animals and humans. In the present study, we explored the functional importance of spinal endogenous acetylcholine in the analgesic action produced by intravenous morphine. METHODS: Rats were implanted with intravenous and intrathecal catheters. The antinociceptive effect of morphine was determined by the paw-withdrawal latency in response to a radiant heat stimulus after intrathecal treatment with atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), mecamylamine (a nicotinic receptor antagonist), or cholinergic neurotoxins (ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion [AF64A] and hemicholinium-3). RESULTS: Intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg morphine increased significantly the paw-withdrawal latency. Intrathecal pretreatment with 30 microg atropine (n = 7) or 50 microg mecamylamine (n = 6) both attenuated significantly the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The inhibitory effect of atropine on the effect of morphine was greater than that of mecamylanilne. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of morphine was significantly reduced in rats pretreated with intrathecal AF64A (n = 7) or hemicholinium-3 (n = 6) to inhibit the high-affinity choline transporter and acetylcholine synthesis. We found that intrathecal AF64A reduced significantly the [3H]hemicholinium-3 binding sites but did not affect its affinity in the dorsal spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: The data in the current study indicate that spinal endogenous acetylcholine plays an important role in mediating the analgesic effect of systemic morphine through both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors.     

An analysis of drug interaction between morphine and neostigmine in rats with nerve-ligation injury

Intrathecal neostigmine reverses mechanical allodynia in humans and animals. The efficacy of morphine in a neuropathic pain state is still controversial. This study examines the antiallodynic interaction between morphine and neostigmine in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Rats were prepared with tight ligation of left L5-6 (fifth and sixth lumbar) spinal nerves and chronic intrathecal catheter implantation. Mechanical allodynia was measured by using application of von Frey hairs to the left hindpaw. Morphine (1, 3, 10, and 30 microg) and neostigmine (0.3, 1, 3, and 10 microg) were administered intrathecally to obtain the dose-response curves and the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for each drug. ED(50) values and fractions of the ED(50) values (1/2, 1/4, and 1/8) were administered intrathecally in an equal dose ratio to establish the ED(50). Isobolographic and fractional analyses for the drug interaction were performed. Intrathecal morphine produced a moderate antagonism of the tactile allodynia. A morphine-neostigmine combination produced a dose-dependent increase in withdrawal threshold of the lesioned hind paw with reduced side effects. Both analyses revealed a synergistic interaction after the coadministration of morphine and neostigmine. These experiments suggest that the antiallodynic action of a morphine-neostigmine combination is synergistic at the spinal level. IMPLICATIONS: This study indicates that, by using both isobolographic and fractional analyses, the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal morphine and neostigmine is synergistic when coadministered intrathecally. In a rat model of neuropathic pain, the intrathecal morphine produced a moderate antagonism on touch-evoked allodynia at the spinal level.     

The analgesic interaction between intrathecal clonidine and glutamate receptor antagonists on thermal and formalin-induced pain in rats

Clonidine, an alpha(2) adrenergic receptor agonist, inhibits glutamate release from the spinal cord. We studied the interaction of intrathecally administered clonidine and glutamate receptor antagonists on acute thermal or formalin induced nociception. Sprague-Dawley rats with lumbar intrathecal catheters were tested for their tail withdrawal response by the tail flick test and paw flinches produced by formalin injection after intrathecal administration of saline, clonidine, AP-5 (a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist), or YM872 (an alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor antagonist). The combinations of clonidine and the other two agents were also tested by isobolographic analyses. Motor disturbance and behavioral changes were observed as side effects. The ED(50) values of clonidine decreased from 0.26 microg (tail flick), 0.12 microg (Phase 1) and 0.13 microg (Phase 2) to 0.036 microg, 0.006 microg, and 0.013 microg with AP-5, and 0.039 microg, 0.057 microg, and 0.133 microg with YM872, respectively. Side effects were attenuated in both combinations. In conclusion, spinally administered clonidine and AP-5 or YM872 exhibited potent synergistic analgesia on acute thermal and formalin-induced nociception with decreased side effects in rats. IMPLICATIONS: Combinations of a spinally administered alpha(2) adrenergic receptor agonist and an a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist or an alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor antagonist exhibited potent synergistic analgesia in acute thermal and inflammatory-induced nociception with decreased side effects.     

The antinociceptive and sedative effects of carbachol and oxycodone administered into brainstem pontine reticular formation and spinal subarachnoid space in rats

To clarify the supraspinal and spinal actions of a cholinergic agonist, carbachol, and an opioid, oxycodone, we studied their antinociceptive and behavioral effects when administered into brainstem medial pontine reticular formation (mPRF) or spinal subarachnoid space with or without pretreatment of muscarinic receptor subtype antagonist. Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with a 24-gauge stainless steel guide cannula into the mPRF and chronically implanted with a lumbar intrathecal catheter. Antinociception was tested using tail flick latency, motor coordination was evaluated by the rotarod test, and overt sedation was assessed using a behavioral checklist. Carbachol (0.5-4.0 microg) administered into the mPRF produced significant dose- and time-dependent antinociception, sedation, and motor dysfunction. These were completely blocked by pretreatment with atropine and the M(2) muscarinic antagonist, methoctramine, and partially blocked by pretreatment with M(1) pirenzepine but not with M(3) p-fHHSID: Oxycodone administered into the mPRF did not produce such effects. Spinal carbachol and oxycodone produced antinociception without any behavioral effects; their antinociceptive effects were completely blocked by pretreatment with atropine and M(2) antagonist. These results suggest that the antinociceptive action of carbachol is mediated by muscarinic cholinergic receptor activation, especially by M(2) receptor subtype in mPRF and spinal cord, and that although oxycodone seems unlikely to affect the cholinergic transmission of mPRF, spinal oxycodone-induced analgesia is at least partly mediated via the activation of M(2) receptor subtype at the spinal cord. IMPLICATIONS: Carbachol-induced antinociception and sedation is mediated with the activation of M(2) muscarinic receptors. Oxycodone administered into brainstem medial pontine reticular formation did not cause any antinociceptive or behavioral effects, but its spinal administration produced a significant antinociception via M(2) muscarinic receptor activation     

Chronic blockade of melanocortin receptors alleviates allodynia in rats with neuropathic pain.

We investigated the involvement of the spinal cord melanocortin (MC) system in neuropathic pain. Because we recently demonstrated that MC receptor ligands acutely alter nociception in an animal model of neuropathic pain, in this study we tested whether chronic administration was also effective. We hypothesized that chronic blockade of the spinal MC system might decrease sensory abnormalities associated with this condition. The effects of the MC receptor antagonist SHU9119 (0.5 microg/d) and agonist MTII (0.1 microg/d) were evaluated in rats with a chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve. Drugs were continuously infused into the cisterna magna. Antinociceptive effects were measured with tests involving temperature (10 degrees C or 47.5 degrees C) or mechanical (von Frey) stimulation. The administration of MTII increased mechanical allodynia, whereas SHU9119 produced a profound cold and mechanical antiallodynia, altering responses to control levels. The antiallodynic effects of SHU9119 were very similar to those produced by the alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist tizanidine (50 microg/d). The effects of SHU9119 and MTII are most likely mediated through the MC4 receptor, because this is the only MC-receptor subtype present in the spinal cord. We conclude that the chronic administration of MC4-receptor antagonists might provide a promising tool in the treatment of neuropathic pain. IMPLICATIONS: In this study we demonstrated that continuous intrathecal infusion of the melanocortin-receptor antagonist SHU9119 reduces cold and mechanical allodynia in rats with a chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve, a lesion producing neuropathic pain.     

The interaction of antinociceptive effects of morphine and GABA receptor agonists within the rat spinal cord.

Previous reports indicate that there may be an interaction between gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors and opioid receptors systems within the spinal cord, the antinociceptive effects of which have not been elucidated. We examined the effects of intrathecally coadministered morphine and muscimol or baclofen on somatic and visceral antinociception in rats. The tail flick (TF) test and colorectal distension (CD) test were used to assess somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects, respectively. Motor function was also assessed. The measurements were performed for 180 min after the intrathecal administration of morphine (0.1-10 micrograms), muscimol (0.2-10 micrograms), baclofen (0.03-1 microgram), combination of morphine and muscimol or baclofen, or saline. Morphine, muscimol, or baclofen increased both TF latency and CD threshold in a dose-dependent fashion. Although morphine 0.1 microgram, muscimol 0.2 microgram, or baclofen 0.03 microgram alone did not significantly increase TF latency and CD threshold, the combination of morphine 0.1 microgram and muscimol 0.2 microgram or baclofen 0.03 microgram significantly increased both TF latency and CD threshold. The coadministration of muscimol or baclofen increased the antinociceptive effects of morphine in intensity and duration. None of the rats showed motor dysfunction after the coadministration of morphine and muscimol 0.2 microgram, although muscimol produced motor paralysis of the lower limbs in a dose-dependent fashion. Those results suggest a clinical relevance of the coadministration of mu-opioids and GABA receptor agonists for pain control. Implications: We examined the antinociceptive interaction between morphine and muscimol or baclofen at the spinal level in rats. Intrathecal muscimol or baclofen potentiated both somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects of morphine.