Color Doppler diagnosis of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation: usefulness of the flow convergence region proximal to the regurgitant orifice

In prosthetic or paravalvular prosthetic mitral regurgitation, transthoracic color Doppler flow mapping can sometimes fail to detect the regurgitant jet within the left atrium because of the shadowing by the prosthetic valve. To overcome this limitation, we assessed the utility of color Doppler visualization of the flow convergence region (FCR) proximal to the regurgitant orifice in 20 consecutive patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation documented by surgery and cardiac catheterization (13 of 20 patients). In addition, we studied 33 patients with normally functioning mitral prostheses. Doppler studies were performed in the apical, subcostal, and parasternal long-axis views. An FCR was detected in 95% (19 of 20) of patients with prosthetic mitral regurgitation. A jet area in the left atrium was detected in 60% (12 of 20) of patients. In 18 of 19 patients with Doppler-detected FCR, the site of the leak was correctly identified by observing the location of the FCR. A trivial jet area was detected in eight patients with a normally functioning mitral prosthesis; in none was an FCR identified. Thus color Doppler visualization of the FCR proximal to the regurgitant orifice is superior to the jet area in the diagnosis of mechanical prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Moreover, FCR permits localization of the site of the leak with good accuracy.     

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Bj?rk-Shiley prosthetic values

Doppler echocardiographic characteristics of normally functioning Hancock and Bj?rk-Shiley prostheses in the mitral and aortic positions were studied in 50 patients whose valvular function was considered normal by clinical evaluation. Doppler studies were also performed in 46 patients with suspected malfunction of Hancock and Bj?rk-Shiley valves and who subsequently underwent cardiac catheterization. Mean gradients were estimated for both mitral and aortic valve prostheses and valve area was calculated for the mitral prostheses. Doppler prosthetic mitral valve gradient and valve area showed good correlation with values obtained with cardiac catheterization (r = 0.93 and 0.97, respectively) for both types of prosthetic valves. The correlation coefficient (r = 0.93) for mean prosthetic aortic valve gradient was also good, although Doppler echocardiography overestimated the mean gradient at lower degrees of obstruction. Regurgitation of Hancock and Bj?rk-Shiley prostheses in the mitral and aortic positions was correctly diagnosed. These results suggest that Doppler echocardiography is a reliable method for the characterization of normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function.     

Effective regurgitant orifice area: A noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, relation to other methods and significance of the effective regurgitant orifice area measurement.Background. Assessment of the severity of valvular regurgitation (effective regurgitant orifice area) has not been implemented in clinical practice but can be made by Doppler echocardiography.Methods. Effective regurgitant orifice area was calculated by Doppler echocardiography as the ratio of regurgitant volume/ regurgitant jet time-velocity integral and compared with color flow Doppler mapping, angiography, surgical classification, regurgitant fraction and variables of volume overload.Results. In 210 consecutive patients examined prospectively, feasibility improved from the early to the late experience (65% to 95%). Effective regurgitant orifice area was 28 ± 23 mm²(mean ± SD) for aortic regurgitation (32 patients), 22 ± 13 mm²for ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation (50 patients) and 41 ± 32 mm²for organic mitral regurgitation (82 patients). Significant correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice and mitral jet area by color flow Doppler mapping (r = 0.68 and r = 0.63, p < 0.0001, respectively) and angiographic grade (r = 0.77, p = 0.0004). Effective regurgitant orifice area in surgically determined moderate and severe lesions was markedly different in mitral regurgitation (35 ± 12 and 75 ± 33 mm², respectively, p = 0.009) and in aortic regurgitation (21 ± 8 and 38 ± 5 mm², respectively, p = 0.08). Strong correlations were found between effective regurgitant orifice area and variables reflecting volume overload. A logarithmic regression was found between effective regurgitant orifice area and regurgitant fraction, underlining the complementarity of these indexes.Conclusions. Calculation of effective regurgitant orifice area is a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept, allowing assessment of the lesion severity of valvular regurgitation. Feasibility is excellent with experience. Effective regurgitant orifice area is an important and clinically significant index of regurgitation severity. It brings additive information to other quantitative indexes and its measurement should be implemented in the comprehensive assessment of valvular regurgitation.     

Doppler echocardiography assessment of prosthetic heart valves

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is an accurate noninvasive method for the evaluation of prosthetic valve function. The flow characteristics and pressure gradients of normally functioning mechanical and bioprosthetic valves have been, in general established. Normal functioning mitral valve prostheses have a valve area > 1.8 cm² with the St. Jude valve having the largest effective valve area and normally functioning aortic prosthetic valves have a peak instantaneous gradient of < 45 mmHg, with the Starr-Edwards valves (Starr-Edwards, Irvine CA) showing the highest gradients. The incidence of minimal or mild regurgitation is approximately 15% to 30% in the mitral position and 25% to 50% in the aortic position, with the higher incidence of regurgitation seen with mechanical compared to bioprosthetic valves. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography can accurately detect patients with prosthetic valvular stenosis. The presence of prosthetic aortic regurgitation can also generally be accurately assessed, except in the presence of both prosthetic aortic and mitral valves. Assessment of prosthetic mitral regurgitation remains limited due to significant attenuation of the ultrasound beam by the prosthesis and the frequent underestimation of severity of regurgitation. Other limitations of transthoracic studies include assessment of leaflet morphology, detection of vegetations and valve abscesses, and differentiation between valvular and paravalvular regurgitation.     

Application of Doppler color flow imaging to determine valve area in mitral stenosis.

This study was undertaken to examine whether Doppler color flow imaging could accurately estimate the valve area in mitral stenosis. Doppler color flow assessments were performed in both an in vitro model and in 30 patients with mitral stenosis undergoing cardiac catheterization. In the experimental Doppler study using a circuit model, color jet width correlated well with actual orifice diameter (r = 0.99). In the clinical Doppler study, the mitral valve orifice was assumed to be elliptic and the mitral valve area was calculated from the following equation: (pi/4) (a x b), where a = color jet width at the mitral valve orifice in the apical long-axis view (short diameter) and b = the width in the 90 degrees rotated view (long diameter). Mitral valve area was also determined by two-dimensional echocardiography and the pressure half-time method, and the results for all three noninvasive methods were compared with those obtained at cardiac catheterization. By Doppler color flow imaging, mitral valve area could be determined in all patients and there was a significant correlation between the Doppler jet and catheterization estimates of mitral valve area (r = 0.93). Valve area determined by two-dimensional echocardiography correlated well with catheterization measurements in 26 patients (r = 0.84). However, the area could not be determined in 4 (13%) of the 30 patients because of technical problems. Although there was a fair correlation between the valve area determined by the pressure half-time method and catheterization (r = 0.79), this method tended to overestimate valve area in patients with aortic regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Value and limitations of color Doppler flow mapping in the detection and semiquantification of valvular regurgitation

Summary We compared color Doppler flow mapping data to angiographic data in 294 patients with suspected valvular regurgitation. Thirty-one patients had rheumatic mitral regurgitation and 37 had mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse by angiography. Ten patients had no angiographic regurgitation (4 rheumatic, 6 prolapse). The remaining patients included 86 with suspected aortic regurgitation and 130 with suspected tricuspid regurgitation. Angiographically 74 had aortic regurgitation and 111 tricuspid regurgitation. The maximum size of regurgitant jets was evaluated in each patient by color flow mapping. The width of the jets was also taken into consideration. In 29 of the 31 with rheumatic regurgitation and 67 of the 74 with aortic regurgitation by angiography, abnormal regurgitant signals were detected by color flow mapping. In both rheumatic mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation, color Doppler estimation of the jets correlated well with angiographic grading. The regurgitant jets in these regurgitation were not eccentric. In the 37 with mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse by left ventriculography, abnormal jets were detected in 35 by color flow mapping. However, the regurgitant jets were eccentric and color Doppler estimation of the jets correlated poorly with angiographic grading. In patients with tricuspid regurgitation, color Doppler grading of regurgitation correlated poorly with right ventriculographic grading. A color Doppler underestimation was observed in 48%. In conclusion, color Doppler flow mapping is useful in the noninvasive detection and semiquantification of rheumatic mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation having non-eccentric jets, although this technique often underestimates the severity of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse.     

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of tilting-disc prosthetic heart valves in children

To determine the Doppler characteristics of tilting-disc prosthetic heart valves in children, 22 children with mitral prostheses were studied 8 +/- 2 months after surgery, and 10 children with aortic prostheses were studied 37 +/- 26 months after surgery. All valves were thought to be functioning normally by clinical examination. Valve competence was interrogated and peak and mean velocities were measured by standard pulsed wave, continuous wave and color Doppler techniques. Prosthetic valve area was calculated and compared to the known valve area. Mild prosthetic valve regurgitation was present in 8 of 22 mitral and 7 of 10 aortic prostheses. For mitral prostheses, peak velocity was 192 +/- 41 cm/s, mean velocity was 118 +/- 37 cm/s and mean gradient was 7 +/- 4 mm Hg. For aortic prostheses, peak velocity was 287 +/- 88 cm/s, mean velocity was 197 +/- 59 cm/s, peak gradient was 36 +/- 21 mm Hg and mean gradient was 19 +/- 11 mm Hg. Prosthetic mitral valve area, calculated by the pressure half-time and modified Gorlin methods, correlated well with the known valve area (r = 0.89, standard error of the estimate = 0.29 and r = 0.95, standard error of the estimate = 0.21, respectively). Prosthetic aortic valve area, calculated by the modified Gorlin method, correlated well with the known valve area (r = 0.89, standard error of the estimate = 0.18). Residual valvular abnormalities are common after prosthetic valve insertion in children. Doppler estimates of prosthetic valve area correlate well with the known valve area but have a large standard error of the estimate.     

Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Bj?rk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves

One hundred thirty-four patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic heart valves were investigated with Doppler echocardiography to determine normal values for commonly used prosthetic valves and to test the specificity of abnormal Doppler findings. In 70 patients the aortic valves had been replaced and in 64 the mitral valves had been replaced. Gradients across prostheses in the aortic position were calculated from maximal velocity. Peak calculated aortic transvalvular gradients in normal subjects were 22 +/- 10 mm Hg in 33 Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 23 +/- 10 mm Hg in 27 porcine valves and 29 +/- 13 mm Hg in 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mild aortic regurgitation was seen in 42% of Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 26% of porcine valves and 2 of 6 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral valve orifice was calculated by the pressure half-time method. In clinically normal patients with mitral valve prostheses, the effective mitral valve orifice was 2.5 +/- 0.8 cm2 in 35 Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 2.1 +/- 0.7 cm2 in 17 porcine valves, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 cm2 in 10 Starr-Edwards valves. Mitral regurgitation was found in 11% of Bj?rk-Shiley valves, 19% of porcine valves and 30% of Starr-Edwards valves. Repeat studies at 2 weeks to 14 months revealed no difference in 8 aortic and 14 mitral prostheses. Seven aortic and 4 mitral valves functioned abnormally as determined by Doppler, and the abnormal function was confirmed in each at surgery or at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Doppler evaluation of the Sorin and Medtronic-Hall prostheses in the aortic position

Doppler characteristics of normally functioning tilting disk prostheses in aortic position were studied in 55 patients (30 Medtronic-Hall and 25 Sorin) whose valvular function was considered normal using clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. Peak gradients, mean gradients and effective orifice area were estimated for different sizes of prostheses. The peak gradient calculated from maximal aortic velocity was 27.3 +/- 11.1 mmHg in Sorin and 21.1 +/- 9.7 mmHg in Medtronic-Hall valves; the mean gradients were 12.9 +/- 6.2 mmHg and 10.8 +/- 5.7 mmHg in Sorin and Medtronic-Hall valves respectively. The effective orifice area calculated by the continuity equation was 1.4 +/- 0.5 cm2 in Sorin and 1.5 +/- 0.57 cm2 in Medtronic-Hall prostheses; the performance index calculated as the ratio between functional area and manufactured area was 0.4-0.6 for Medtronic-Hall and 0.45-0.52 for Sorin prostheses. Prosthetic regurgitation was found in 64% of Sorin valves and 80% of Medtronic-Hall valves; prosthetic regurgitation was mild in 81% and moderate in 19% of cases. Doppler echocardiography is a reliable method for the characterization of the normal function of prosthetic aortic valves and provides information similar to cardiac catheterization.     

Transesophageal color Doppler flow imaging in the evaluation of prosthetic cardiac valves

To determine the value of transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic cardiac valves, 11 patients with clinically suspected cardiac prosthetic valve dysfunction were studied by transesophageal two-dimensional imaging, as well as by color Doppler flow mapping. Among these 11 patients, there were 10 with biological tissue valves and 3 with metallic valves (1 Bjork-Shiley, 2 St. Jude). Nine patients had replacement of mitral valves alone. The remaining two had received both mitral and aortic prostheses. The degree of mitral regurgitation was graded by transesophageal color Doppler according to the area of the regurgitant jet visualized. The degree of aortic regurgitation was graded by the jet height/left ventricular outflow height ratio method. All transesophageal studies were performed without complication and all were well tolerated. The pathological morphology of the cardiac prosthesis was clearly visualized by transesophageal two-dimensional imaging and subsequently proven at surgery. Of those tested, one patient was found to have a torn leaflet, one had a dislodged leaflet, one patient had paravalvular leakage, four had cusp vegetations, and five patients had prosthetic degeneration for other reasons. Mitral regurgitation was graded as absent in one patient, mild in two patients, moderate in two patients, and severe in six patients. Aortic regurgitation was graded as severe in both patients with aortic prostheses. We conclude that in patients with clinically suspected cardiac prosthetic dysfunction, transesophageal two-dimensional imaging combined with color Doppler can provide reliable information that corresponds to surgical findings.     

Vena contracta width as a simple method of assessing mitral valve regurgitation. Comparison with Doppler quantitative methods

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Quantitative Doppler echocardiography and proximal flow convergence methods facilitate quantification of regurgitant volume (RV), regurgitant fraction (RF) and the measurement of effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) to define mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. Vena contracta width (VCW) has been proposed as a simple, accurate marker of MR, and is instrumental in predicting the angiographic severity of valvular regurgitation. The study aim was to compare VCW with quantitative Doppler methods and angiography for assessing MR. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with MR (50 males; mean age 54 +/- 8 years; range: 34-84 years) were included. The etiology of MR was coronary artery disease, infective endocarditis, rheumatic disease, dilated cardiomyopathy or mitral valve prolapse. Exclusion criteria included aortic stenosis and/or aortic insufficiency, mitral stenosis, mechanical prostheses and atrial fibrillation. RV and ERO estimated by the proximal isovelocity surface area method (PISA), and RF calculated by Doppler, were compared with VCW measured by color Doppler. The angiographic severity of MR was classified on a four-point scale, in compliance with Sellers' criteria. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between VCW and ERO (r2 = 0.70, p <0.001), RV (r2 = 0.73, p <0.001), RF (r2 = 0.71, p <0.001) and angiographic grade (r2 = 0.72, p <0.001). CONCLUSION: VCW measured by color Doppler correlates well with MR severity. In addition, VCW is a simple, reproducible quantitative measurement of MR, and is recommended for use in the non-invasive assessment of the condition.     

Relation between Doppler color flow variables and invasively determined jet variables in patients with aortic regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that invasively derived jet variables including regurgitant orifice area and momentum determine the characteristics of Doppler color flow jets in patients with aortic regurgitation. BACKGROUND. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the velocity distribution of a regurgitant jet is best characterized by the momentum of the jet, which incorporates orifice area and velocity of flow through the orifice. METHODS. Peak jet momentum, peak flow rate and regurgitant orifice area were determined with intraaortic Doppler catheter and cardiac catheterization techniques in 22 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. These invasively derived variables were compared with apical and parasternal long-axis Doppler color echocardiographic variables obtained in the catheterization laboratory. RESULTS. Jet momentum increased significantly with the angiographic grade of regurgitation. The apical color jet area of aortic regurgitation increased linearly with jet momentum and regurgitant orifice area in vivo, but the correlations were only moderately good (r = 0.63 and 0.65, respectively). Color jet length also increased linearly with jet momentum and with regurgitant orifice area. There was only a trend for Doppler color jet width to increase with all invasively derived jet variables. CONCLUSIONS. Whereas jet area by Doppler color flow imaging is directly related to both orifice area and jet momentum in vivo, Doppler color variables measured in planes normal to the orifice do not correlate well enough with either jet momentum or regurgitant orifice area to predict jet flow variables in patients with aortic regurgitation. It is likely that the important influence of adjacent boundaries will limit the use of the velocity distribution of aortic regurgitant jets for determining the severity of disease.     

Shu 508 A (Levovist)-enhanced Doppler echocardiography improves the assessment of valvular heart disease

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intravenous injection of SHU 508 A improves the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of valvular pathologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients with valvular pathology (aortic stenosis, n = 48; aortic regurgitation, n = 20; mitral stenosis, n = 21; and mitral regurgitation, n = 36) and diagnostically insufficient Doppler signal were enrolled in this multicenter study. The severity of valvular pathology was graded on a four-point scale using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced Doppler echocardiography as well as cardiac catheterization. Agreement with cardiac catheterization findings increased from 63% using the unenhanced examination to 73% using the contrast-enhanced Doppler examination. Grading was possible in all patients using SHU 508 A, whereas the unenhanced Doppler examination remained inconclusive in six patients. The weighted kappa coefficient between contrast-enhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization for all diagnoses was 0.76 as compared to 0.68 between unenhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization. Agreement was especially improved in aortic stenosis (kappa 0.69 unenhanced vs 0.81 contrast-enhanced) and in aortic regurgitation (kappa 0.45 unenhanced vs 0.75 contrast-enhanced). Patients with mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation experienced less improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In case of an inconclusive unenhanced Doppler echo study, the administration of a left heart contrast agent should be considered. SHU 508 A is especially useful in improving the severity grading of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, while grading of mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation is less improved.     

Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular motion using endocardial landmarks

Doppler echocardiography was performed in 136 patients with a normally functioning prosthetic valve in the aortic (n = 59), mitral (n = 74) and tricuspid (n = 3) positions. These included patients with St. Jude (n = 82), Bj?rk-Shiley (n = 18), Beall (n = 13), Starr-Edwards (n = 7) or tissue (n = 16) valves. Peak and mean pressure gradients across the prostheses were measured using the simplified Bernoulli equation. The prosthetic valve orifice (PVO, in square centimeters), only in the mitral position, was calculated by the equation: PVO = 220/pressure half-time. In the aortic position, the St. Jude valve had a lower peak velocity (2.3 +/- 0.6 m/s, range 1.0 to 3.9), peak gradient (22 +/- 12 mm Hg, range 4 to 61) and mean gradient (12 +/- 7 mm Hg, range 2 to 32) than the other valves (p less than 0.05) when compared with Starr-Edwards). In the mitral position, the St. Jude valve had the largest orifice (3.0 +/- 0.6 cm2, range 1.8 to 5.0) (p less than 0.0001 compared with all other valves). Insignificant regurgitation was commonly found by pulsed mode Doppler technique in patients with a St. Jude or Bj?rk-Shiley valve in the aortic or mitral position and in patients with a Starr-Edwards or tissue valve in the aortic position. In 17 other patients with a malfunctioning prosthesis (four St. Jude, two Bj?rk-Shiley, four Beall and seven tissue valves) proven by cardiac catheterization, surgery or autopsy, Doppler echocardiography correctly identified the complication (significant regurgitation or obstruction) in all but 2 patients who had a Beall valve. It is concluded that 1) the St. Jude valve appears to have the most optimal hemodynamics; mild regurgitation can be detected by the Doppler technique in normally functioning St. Jude and Bj?rk-Shiley valves in the aortic or mitral position and in Starr-Edwards and tissue valves in the aortic position, and 2) Doppler echocardiography is a useful method for the detection of prosthetic valve malfunction, especially when the St. Jude, Bj?rk-Shiley and tissue valves are assessed.     

Single-plane transesophageal echocardiography for assessing function of mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the aortic valve position.

To assess the value and limitations of single-plane transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of prosthetic aortic valve function, 89 patients (69 mechanical and 20 bioprosthetic aortic valves) were studied by combined transthoracic and transesophageal 2-dimensional and color flow Doppler echocardiography. In the assessment of aortic regurgitation, the transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic findings were concordant in 71 of 89 patients (80%). In 8 patients, the degree of aortic regurgitation was underestimated by the transthoracic approach; in each case the quality of the transthoracic echocardiogram was poor. In 10 patients, transesophageal echocardiography failed to detect trivial aortic regurgitation due to acoustic shadowing of the left ventricular outflow tract from a mechanical valve in the mitral valve position. Transesophageal echocardiography was superior to transthoracic echocardiography in diagnosing perivalvular abscess, subaortic perforation, valvular dehiscence, torn or thickened bioprosthetic aortic valve cusps, and in clearly distinguishing perivalvular from valvular aortic regurgitation. Transesophageal echocardiography correctly diagnosed bioprosthetic valve obstruction in 1 patient, but failed to diagnose mechanical valve obstruction in another. In conclusion, transesophageal echocardiography offers no advantage over the transthoracic approach in the detection and quantification of prosthetic aortic regurgitation unless the transthoracic image quality is poor. Transesophageal echocardiography is limited in detecting mechanical valve obstruction and in detecting aortic regurgitation in the presence of a mechanical prosthesis in the mitral valve position. However, it is superior to transthoracic echocardiography in identifying perivalvular pathology, differentiating perivalvular from valvular regurgitation and in defining the anatomic abnormality responsible for the prosthetic valve dysfunction. Combined transthoracic and transesophageal examination provides complete anatomic and hemodynamic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve function.     

Regurgitant jet size by transesophageal compared with transthoracic Doppler color flow imaging

Combined echocardiography and Doppler color flow mapping from transthoracic imaging windows has become the standard method for the noninvasive assessment of valvular regurgitation. This study compared regurgitant jet areas by Doppler color flow imaging derived from the newer transesophageal approach with measurements obtained from conventional transthoracic apical views. Maximal regurgitant jet area determinations and an overall visual estimate of lesion severity were obtained from 42 patients who underwent color flow examination by both techniques. Seventy-three regurgitant lesions were visualized by transesophageal flow imaging: 34 mitral, 22 aortic, and 17 tricuspid jets. Transthoracic studies in the same patients revealed fewer regurgitant lesions for each valve; 20 mitral, 16 aortic, and 12 tricuspid (p = 0.0009). A comparison of maximal jet areas determined by transesophageal and transthoracic studies showed a good overall correlation (r = 0.85, SEE = 2.8 cm2) and a systematic overestimation by the transesophageal technique (TEE = 0.96 TTX + 2.7). For the subgroup with mitral insufficiency, valve lesions visualized by both techniques were larger by the transesophageal approach (n = 18, 6.0 versus 3.6 cm2, p = 0.008). Semiquantitative visual grading of individual valve lesions by two independent observers revealed a higher grade of regurgitation with more jets classified as mild (38 versus 25), moderate (18 versus 13), and severe (17 versus 10) by esophageal imaging than by transthoracic imaging. Thus, transesophageal color flow mapping techniques yield a higher prevalence of valvular regurgitation than do transthoracic techniques in the same patients. Jet area and the overall estimate of regurgitant lesion severity were also greater by transesophageal color Doppler imaging compared with standard transthoracic imaging.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Doppler techniques in the detection of valvular regurgitation: their value and limitations

To evaluate the clinical value of various Doppler techniques in detecting valvular regurgitation, we compared the sensitivity, timing and duration of regurgitation, and the peak velocity of regurgitant signals among conventional pulsed Doppler, color Doppler, continuous wave Doppler and HPRF Doppler echocardiography. 1. Sensitivity of Doppler techniques in detecting mitral regurgitation: Among fifty patients with mitral regurgitation confirmed by left ventriculography, mitral regurgitation was detected in 48 (96%) using color Doppler and pulsed Doppler echocardiography; in 41 (82%) by HPRF Doppler; and in 37 (74%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In 103 consecutive normal volunteers, mitral regurgitant signals were detected in 46 (45%) by color Doppler, in 39 (38%) by pulsed Doppler, in 16 (16%) by HPRF Doppler, and in 8 (8%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. 2. Timing and duration of regurgitant signals: To assess the timing and duration of regurgitant signals, 43 patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during systole or diastole were studied using M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Using the latter method, regurgitant signals throughout systole and the isovolumic relaxation period could be demonstrated in all but four patients who had regurgitant signals of short duration during systole, but suggesting mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. In all patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during diastole, aortic or pulmonary regurgitant signals throughout diastole could be demonstrated with M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Thus, this technique is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting accurate timing and duration of valvular regurgitation. 3. Peak velocity of regurgitant flow: To compare the peak velocity of regurgitant flow by continuous wave Doppler and by HPRF Doppler echocardiography, 20 patients with mitral regurgitation and 22 patients with tricuspid regurgitation were examined using the both methods. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography correlated well (r = 0.96) with that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. However, in patients with mild mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography was higher than that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity had a close correlation (r = 0.99) with the both techniques. In patients with mild tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity was higher by HPRF than by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In conclusion, color or pulsed Doppler echocardiography should be used for detecting valvular regurgitation. M-mode color Doppler echocardiography is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting timing and duration of valvular regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Value of acceleration flow signals proximal to the leaking orifice in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation.

To test the value of acceleration flow signals proximal to the leaking orifice in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation, 39 consecutive patients undergoing left ventriculography were examined by Doppler color flow imaging. Acceleration flow signals proximal to the regurgitant orifice were detected in 27 of the 31 patients who had prosthetic mitral regurgitation by left ventriculography (sensitivity 87%). All four patients without acceleration flow signals had mild prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography. No acceleration flow signals were detected in any patient without prosthetic regurgitation by left ventriculography (specificity 100%). Individual values of the maximal area of acceleration flow signals obtained from three orthogonal planes in seven patients with mild prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography ranged from 0 to 17 mm2 (mean 4 +/- 6). In 8 patients with moderate prosthetic mitral regurgitation by angiography, the maximal area of acceleration flow signals ranged from 21 to 58 mm2 (mean 33 +/- 15), whereas the maximal area of acceleration flow signals in 16 patients with severe prosthetic regurgitation ranged from 20 to 173 mm2 (mean 102 +/- 41). The maximal area of the acceleration flow signals from three planes correlated well with the angiographic grade of prosthetic mitral regurgitation. There was a significant difference in the maximal area of acceleration flow signals between mild and moderate (p less than 0.001), moderate and severe (p less than 0.001) and mild and severe (p less than 0.001) prosthetic mitral regurgitation. Thus, measurement of acceleration flow signals by Doppler color flow imaging is useful in assessing the severity of prosthetic mitral regurgitation.     

Quantification of aortic regurgitation utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound

Aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis are hemodynamically similar, insofar as both result in passive ventricular filling across a narrow orifice driven by a declining pressure gradient. Because mitral stenosis is successfully characterized by Doppler ultrasound determination of the velocity half-time, or time constant, aortic regurgitation might be quantified in an analogous fashion. Eighty-six patients with diverse causes of aortic regurgitation underwent continuous wave Doppler examination before cardiac catheterization or urgent aortic valve replacement. The Doppler velocity half-time was defined as the time required for the diastolic aortic regurgitation velocity profile to decay by 29%, whereas catheterization pressure half-time was calculated as the time required for transvalvular pressure to decay by 50%. Doppler velocity and catheterization pressure half-times were linearly related (r = 0.91). Doppler velocity half-times were inversely related to regurgitant fraction (r = -0.88). Angiographic severity (1+ = mild to 4+ = severe) was also inversely related to pressure and velocity half-time; a Doppler half-time threshold of 400 ms separated mild (1+, 2+) from significant (3+, 4+) aortic regurgitation with high specificity (0.92) and predictive value (0.90). The Doppler velocity half-time was independent of pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Estimation of transvalvular aortic pressure half-time utilizing continuous wave Doppler ultrasound is a reliable and accurate method for the noninvasive evaluation of the severity of aortic regurgitation.     

Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study

Studies correlating prosthetic valve gradients determined by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography with gradients obtained by cardiac catheterization have, to date, been limited to patients with mitral and tricuspid prostheses or have compared nonsimultaneous measurements. Simultaneous Doppler and catheter pressure gradients in 36 patients (mean age, 63 +/- 13 years) with 42 prosthetic valves (20 aortic, 20 mitral, one tricuspid, and one pulmonary) were studied. Catheter gradients were obtained using a dual-catheter technique. The simultaneous pressure tracings and Doppler flow velocity profiles were digitized at 10-msec intervals to derive the corresponding maximal and mean gradients. The correlation between the maximal Doppler gradient and the simultaneously measured maximal catheter gradient was 0.94 (SEE = 6), and that between the Doppler gradient and the simultaneously measured mean catheter gradient was 0.96 (SEE = 3). There were no significant differences in correlation between gradients for the 32 mechanical valves (maximal gradients: r = 0.95, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.96, SEE = 3) and the 10 bioprosthetic valves (maximal gradients: r = 0.89, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.93, SEE = 3). In patients with mitral prostheses, Doppler gradients correlated well with the corresponding catheter gradients obtained with direct measurement of left atrial pressure (maximal gradients: r = 0.96, SEE = 2; mean gradients: r = 0.97, SEE = 1.2). A close correlation between corresponding Doppler and catheter gradients also was found in patients with aortic prostheses (maximal gradients: r = 0.94, SEE = 6; mean gradients: r = 0.94, SEE = 3). Thus, continuous wave Doppler echocardiography can accurately predict the pressure gradient across prosthetic valves.