Comparison of minimal inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations of 4 fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus remains an important human pathogen affecting both outpatients and those hospitalized. Increasing antimicrobial resistance is global but prevalence rates are variable for different geographical areas. Fluoroquinolones have been used to treat S. aureus infections and the newer quinolones have enhanced in vitro activity against this organism. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) defines the antimicrobial drug concentration threshold that would require an organism to simultaneously possess two mutations for growth in the presence of the drug. We tested clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) S. aureus by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC against gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. For MSSA strains, the rank order of potency based on MIC(90) values were gemifloxacin (0.063 mg/l) = moxifloxacin (0.063 mg/l) > gatifloxacin (0.05 mg/l) = levofloxacin (0.25 mg/l) and by MPC values moxifloxacin (0.25 mg/l) > gemifloxacin (0.5 mg/l) > gatifloxacin (1 mg/l) = levofloxacin (1mg/l). For 87% of the isolates the MPC value was 0.5 mg/l for gatifloxacin. The rank order of potency based on the time the serum drug concentration exceeded the MPC(90), was as follows: moxifloxacin (>24 h) > levofloxacin (>18 h) > gatifloxacin (12 h) > gemifloxacin (9 h). Serum drug concentration remained in excess of the MPC(87) for 24 h for gatifloxacin. Both MIC(90) and MPC(90) values were higher against MRSA strains and the time above the MPC(90) was significantly shorter for all agents.     

In vitro activity of telithromycin compared with macrolides and fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis

The in vitro activity of telithromycin was compared with erythromycin A, azithromycin, clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin G, ampicillin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone against 336 consecutive strains (83 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 168 Haemophilus influenzae and 85 Moraxella catarrhalis) isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Telithromycin (MIC(90), 0.008 mg/l) was the most active drug against S. pneumoniae. Telithromycin was also highly active against M. catarrhalis (MIC(90), 0.06 mg/l), but less active against H. influenzae (MIC(90), 4 mg/l).     

In vitro activity of gemifloxacin and contemporary oral antimicrobial agents against 27247 Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic isolates: a global surveillance study

This study was a multi-centre, multi-country surveillance of 27247 Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates collected from 131 study centres in 44 countries from 1997 to 2000. MICs of gemifloxacin were compared with penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, azithromycin, clarithromycin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, grepafloxacin and levofloxacin by broth microdilution. Penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae was extremely high in the Middle East (65.6%), Africa (64.0%) and Asia (60.4%) and lower in North America (40.3%), Europe (36.9%) and the South Pacific (31.8%). Macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae was highest in Asia (51.7%) but varied widely between laboratories in Europe (26.0%), North America (21.6%), the Middle East (13.7%), the South Pacific (10.6%) and Africa (10.0%). All the study quinolones were highly active against penicillin-resistant and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. Overall, gemifloxacin had the lowest MIC(90) at 0.06 mg/l with MICs 4-64-fold lower than ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and grepafloxacin against S. pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin MICs were more potent than grepafloxacin > levoflaxacin > ciproflaxin against the Gram-positive aerobes and shared comparable Gram-negative activity with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin to other fluoroquinolones and non-quinolone agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1999-2000

This study was undertaken to assess the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and other non-quinolone comparator agents (ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) against Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in the United States. Susceptibility testing of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 Haemophilus influenzae and 205 Moraxella catarrhalis showed that 38.2% of pneumococci were penicillin nonsusceptible, while 26.2 and 95.6% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively, produced beta-lactamase. Overall new fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. The in vitro activity (based on MIC90 in mg/l) of the six fluoroquinolones was gemifloxacin>moxifloxacin>gatifloxacin>levofloxacin>ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

In vitro activities of mutant prevention concentration-targeted concentrations of fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus in a pharmacodynamic model

To test the validity of the mutant selection window, we simulated mutant prevention concentration-targeted fluoroquinolone concentrations using an in vitro model with infected fibrin clots. Therapeutic ciprofloxacin (peak 5 microg/mL; t(1/2) 4 h), gatifloxacin (3.5 microg/mL; 8h), gemifloxacin (1.25 microg/mL; 8 h), levofloxacin (6 microg/mL; 6 h) and moxifloxacin (4.5 microg/mL; 12 h) were tested against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus, as were mutant prevention concentration (MPC)-targeted regimens achieving a trough of 1/4x or 2x MPC. MIC/MPC for MSSA K553 were 0.125/2, 0.03/0.125, 0.03/0.063, 0.125/1 and 0.015/0.25 microg/mL for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively. Corresponding values for MRSA 494 were 0.125/1, 0.063/0.125, 0.03/0.063, 0.125/0.5 and 0.063/0.125 microg/mL. All regimens produced efflux mutants of MSSA K553. For MRSA 494, therapeutic and 1/4x MPC levofloxacin regimens produced resistance, whereas only 1/4x MPC regimens of gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin produced resistance. All ciprofloxacin regimens produced resistance. Ciprofloxacin 1/4x MPC and therapeutic levofloxacin caused outgrowth of GrlA mutants (S80Y amino acid substitution); efflux mutants were isolated in all other cases. Overall, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin displayed a lesser propensity to select resistant isolates of S. aureus than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. The mutant selection window premise appeared valid for MRSA only. Additional studies are necessary to define the applicability of the MPC.     

Multicentre study of the in vitro evaluation of moxifloxacin and other quinolones against community acquired respiratory pathogens.

The in vitro activity of moxifloxacin was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin and trovafloxacin against 710 strains (180 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 180 Haemophilus influenzae, 160 Moraxella catarrhalis and 190 Streptococcus pyogenes) isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. MIC values for moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin were 0.25/0.25, 0.03/0.03, 0.06/0.03 and 0.125/0.0125 mg/l for S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catharralis and S. pyogenes. Based upon the MIC(90) values and the MIC distributions, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were the most active of the quinolones tested. They showed enhanced activity against Gram-positive organisms including penicillin non susceptible S. pneumoniae strains. Moxifloxacin was also highly active against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.     

Activity of gatifloxacin against strains resistant to ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and its ability to select for less susceptible bacterial variants.

Gatifloxacin is an 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone. On quinolones, this side chain imparts increased activity against Gram-positive bacteria and enhanced killing. Gatifloxacin was tested against ofloxacin non-susceptible (ofloxacin MIC>2 mg/l) strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (gatifloxacin MIC(90), 1 mg/l) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, gatifloxacin MIC(90), 4 mg/l), and to ciprofloxacin non-susceptible (ciprofloxacin MIC>1 mg/l) strains of Escherichia coli (gatifloxacin MIC(90),>16 mg/l) and ciprofloxacin non-susceptible (ciprofloxacin MIC>0.06 mg/l) Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gatifloxacin MIC(50), 0.12 mg/l and MIC(90), 0.5 mg/l). Though gatifloxacin showed some reduced susceptibility to these populations, the MIC(50) and MIC(90) values suggest that gatifloxacin may be useful against pneumococci and some gonococcal strains not susceptible to other fluoroquinolones. Gatifloxacin did not select for less susceptible variants of MRSA and pneumococci, in contrast to the 10- to 100-fold higher selection frequencies with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. The single-step E. coli mutants selected by gatifloxacin and the comparator quinolones had quinolone MICs within the susceptible range. These data suggest that gatifloxacin use may hinder the development of quinolone-resistance, particularly in Gram-positive bacteria.     

Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of gemifloxacin and other antimicrobials against Mycoplasma pneumoniae

The MIC of gemifloxacin was compared with that of sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin using 97 clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. MBCs of fluoroquinolones were determined for a subgroup of 12 isolates. Macrolides were the most potent agents with MIC₉₀s for all drugs 0.001 mg/l. The doxycycline MIC₉₀ was 0.5 mg/l. Gemifloxacin MICs ranged from 0.001 to 0.25 mg/l. The gemifloxacin MIC₉₀ (0.125 mg/l) was equivalent to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, was 2-fold lower than sparfloxacin, 8-fold lower than levofloxacin and 32-fold lower than ciprofloxacin. MBCs for gemifloxacin were predominantly within 2–4 times the corresponding MIC values, indicating a bactericidal effect.     

In vitro activity of gatifloxacin compared with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against uropathogens cultured from patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin were compared with those of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using an agar dilution method for 400 uropathogens cultured from the urine of urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). The collection of strains was made up of Enterobacteriaceae (34.5%), enterococci (31.5%), staphylococci (21.2%) and non-fermenting bacteria (12.8%). The antibacterial activity of the three newer fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, were similar, but showed some drug specific differences. Gemifloxacin was most active against Escherichia coli, but less so against Proteus mirabilis. In this series all isolates of E. coli were inhibited at a MIC of 0.25 mg/l gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and by 0.125 mg/l gemifloxacin. The MIC distribution of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution for staphylococci, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The two modes for P. aeruginosa were 1 and 64 mg/l for gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin and 0.5 and 64 mg/l for gatifloxacin. For staphylococci the two modes were 0.125 and 2 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.03 and 4 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.03 and 2 mg/l for moxifloxacin; for enterococci, 0.25 and 16 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.06 and 2 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.25 and 8 mg/l for moxifloxacin. Compared with trovafloxacin the MICs were similar, but the newer fluoroquinolones were more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria. Of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin had the highest rate of renal excretion and could be considered a promising alternative fluoroquinolone agent for the treatment of UTI.     

Antibacterial activity of tosufloxacin against major organisms detected from patients with respiratory infections

We determined the susceptibility of bacteria which were isolated from the patients with respiratory infections between January and October 2005, to tosufloxacin and other fluoroquinolones. A total of 900 isolate including 300 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 100 Streptococcus pyogenes, 100 Moraxella catarrhalis, 200 Haemophilus influenzae, 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 100 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested. Tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin were used as the test antimicrobials. Tosufloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were potent antibiotics tested for the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus including penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae; the MIC90 were 0.12-0.5/ micromL. Fluoroquinolones exerted the potent antibacterial activity against M. catarrhalis and H. influenzae; the MIC90 of fluoroquinolones tested were < or =0.06 microg/mL. Tosufloxacin, ciprofloxacin and prulifloxacin showed to be more active against K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, but parts of some strains were resistant. These results indicate that tosufloxacin has the potent antibacterial activity against major organisms detected from patients with respiratory infections. Since it was approved in 1990, tosufloxacin was considered to be useful as a therapeutic antimicrobial for the treatment of respiratory infections.     

A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

The new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin) offer excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli and improved Gram-positive activity (e.g. against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin still maintains the best in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroides fragilis) versus ciprofloxacin. All of the new fluoroquinolones display excellent bioavailability and have longer serum half-lives than ciprofloxacin allowing for once daily dose administration. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones to each other or to standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of community-acquired respiratory infections (e.g. pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis). Limited data suggest that the new fluoroquinolones as a class may lead to better outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis versus comparators. Several of these agents have either been withdrawn from the market, had their use severely restricted because of adverse effects (clinafloxacin because of phototoxicity and hypoglycaemia; grepafloxacin because of prolongation of the QTc and resultant torsades de pointes; sparfloxacin because of phototoxicity; and trovafloxacin because of hepatotoxicity), or were discontinued during developmental phases. The remaining fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have adverse effect profiles similar to ciprofloxacin. Extensive post-marketing safety surveillance data (as are available with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) are required for all new fluoroquinolones before safety can be definitively established. Drug interactions are limited; however, all fluoroquinolones interact with metal ion containing drugs (eg. antacids). The new fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) offer several advantages over ciprofloxacin and are emerging as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Their broad spectrum of activity which includes respiratory pathogens such as penicillin and macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae, favourable pharmacokinetic parameters, good bacteriological and clinical efficacy will lead to growing use of these agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. These agents may result in cost savings especially in situations where, because of their potent broad-spectrum activity and excellent bioavailability, they may be used orally in place of intravenous antibacterials. Prudent use of the new fluoroquinolones will be required to minimise the development of resistance to these agents.     

Activity of JNJ-Q2, a new fluoroquinolone, tested against contemporary pathogens isolated from patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia

JNJ-Q2 is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens and is currently in clinical development for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. This study determined the activity of JNJ-Q2 against a worldwide year 2010 collection (89 centres in 27 countries) of three common respiratory pathogens (3757 isolates) from patients with CABP. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis were tested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method, and susceptibility rates for comparators were assessed using CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoint criteria. JNJ-Q2 had activity against all three species, with 96.9% of strains inhibited at ≤0.015 mg/L. JNJ-Q2 [minimum inhibitory concentration for 50% and 90% of the organisms, respectively (MIC(50/90))=0.008/0.015 mg/L] demonstrated a 16-fold greater potency compared with moxifloxacin (MIC(50/90)=0.12/0.25 mg/L) and at least 128-fold greater activity compared with levofloxacin (MIC(50/90)=1/ 1 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (MIC(50/90)=1/2 mg/L) against S. pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae isolates were 21.9-23.3% resistant to ampicillin, but JNJ-Q2 (MIC(50/90)≤0.004/0.015 mg/L) was at least two-fold more active than moxifloxacin (MIC(50/90)=0.015/0.03 mg/L) as well as being potent against M. catarrhalis (MIC(90)=0.015/0.015 mg/L). In conclusion, JNJ-Q2 demonstrated increased potency compared with other marketed fluoroquinolones that have been used to treat CABP pathogens, thus favouring further clinical development.     

Activity of moxifloxacin and other quinolones against pneumococci resistant to first-line agents, or with high-level ciprofloxacin resistance

The activity of moxifloxacin and other quinolones was assessed against 288 epidemiologically diverse isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, many of them resistant to one or more first-line agents and/or with increased ciprofloxacin resistance (minimum inhibitory concentrations, MICs 16- > 64 mg/l compared with 1-2 mg/l for most isolates). Moxifloxacin and grepafloxacin were the most active quinolone analogues, inhibiting about 90% of the isolates at < or = 1 mg/l, whereas levofloxacin inhibited 64% of isolates at < = 1 mg/l and ciprofloxacin inhibited 42%. Moxifloxacin also was the most active agent against isolates with elevated ciprofloxacin resistance (MIC 16- > 64 mg/l): moxifloxacin MICs of around 4 mg/l were seen for most such isolates, compared with 16-32 mg for levofloxacin and grepafloxacin. The activity of moxifloxacin against pneumococci resistant to one or more first-line agent suggests it will have a useful therapeutic role, although its activity against highly ciprofloxacin resistant isolates seems marginal.     

In vivo activity of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against pneumococci with gyrA and parC point mutations in a sepsis mouse model measured with the all or nothing mortality end-point

A dose-decreasing immunocompetent sepsis mouse model was used to evaluate the in vivo effect of levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin, using a ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin susceptible serotype 6B strain (ciprofloxacin MIC: 1 mg/l) and two resistant serotype 14 and 19F strains with gyrA and parC point mutations (ciprofloxacin MICs of 32 and 64 mg/l, respectively). Significant higher in vivo activity was found for moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin than for levofloxacin against strains 1 and 2, and for gemifloxacin versus moxifloxacin or levofloxacin against strain 3. Gemifloxacin treatment resulted in 100% survival against strains 1 and 2(AUC0-24 h/MIC of 30 and 62) but against strain 3, survival was 60-80% (AUC0-24 h/MIC of 93). Similar AUC0-24 h/MIC values produced different therapeutic results suggesting that in vitro parameters other than the MIC could influence efficacy predictions based on in vitro susceptibility tests (MICs) or pharmacodynamic parameters (AUC0-24 h/MIC).     

Comparative in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin and other unrelated antimicrobials against bacterial respiratory tract pathogens

Ciprofloxacin is a new fluorinated 4-quinolone with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity which includes both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In this study the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin has been determined against bacteria associated with respiratory tract infections and compared with that of other antimicrobial agents used in the therapy of such infections. Ciprofloxacin (MIC90 0.008 mg/l) was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae, including isolates producing beta-lactamase which were resistant to amoxycillin. Ciprofloxacin (MIC90 0.06 mg/l) was also highly active against Branhamella catarrhalis, again including those isolates resistant to amoxycillin as a result of beta-lactamase production. Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were less susceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC90 2 mg/l) but were highly susceptible to amoxycillin (MIC90 less than 0.12 mg/l) and erythromycin (MIC90 0.25 mg/l). Isolates of Klebsiella aerogenes were highly susceptible to ciprofloxacin (MIC90 0.06 mg/l) but much less so to amoxycillin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, oxytetracycline and erythromycin. Ciprofloxacin (MIC90 0.5 mg/l) was very active against Staphylococcus aureus, including those isolates resistant to amoxycillin and flucloxacillin, and against Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Together with rifampicin and erythromycin, ciprofloxacin was highly active against Legionella pneumophila (MIC90 0.015 mg/l). These results suggest that clinical evaluation of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of respiratory tract infections is justified.     

Antibacterial activity of gatifloxacin against various fresh clinical isolates in 2002

Antibacterial activities of gatifloxacin (GFLX) and other antibacterial drugs against various fresh clinical strains (800 isolates) isolated from specimens of patients in 2002 were compared. GFLX was more active than levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria such as methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. For these isolates, clarithromycin and azithromycin were less active (MIC90; > 16- > 64 micrograms/mL), GFLX was more active than cefdinir. For Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter species, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, three quinolones including GFLX were potently active (MIC90; < or = 0.06-0.5 microgram/mL). Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from urinary tract infections were resistant to three quinolones including GFLX (MIC90; 32-64 micrograms/mL), however P. aeruginosa isolated from respiratory and otolaryngological infections were more susceptible (MIC90; 0.5-2 micrograms/mL). Quinolones were less active against Neisseria gonorrhoeae as compared with the cephem antibiotics tested, but GFLX was the most active against N. gonorrhoeae among the quinolones tested. In this study, we investigated activity of GFLX against fresh clinical strains isolated early in 2002, GFLX is widely and potently active against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae and various Gram-negative bacteria.     

In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against recent community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens isolated in France: a national survey

Between February and June 2000, 2345 consecutive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated from 2088 adult patients suffering from community-acquired respiratory tract infections, in 97 hospital laboratories. Of the 1037 S. pneumoniae isolates, 48.3% were intermediately or highly penicillin resistant. For invasive isolates, the MIC90s of penicillin G, amoxycillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were 2, 2, 4, 0.5, 1024, 2, 2 and 0.25 mg/l, respectively. All but one invasive strain were susceptible to moxifloxacin whereas 97.5% were susceptible to levofloxacin. The MIC90s of clinical isolates with intermediate susceptibility or high resistance to penicillin G, were 2, 2, 4, 1, 1024, 2, 2 and 0.25 mg/l. About 98.1, 97.0, and 83.1% of strains were inhibited by concentrations < or = 1 mg/l of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively (E-test). Eight of the 1037 S. pneumoniae strains were not susceptible to moxifloxacin and had mutations in gyrA (eight strains), parC (four strains) or parE (three strains). Against H. influenzae (32.7% were beta-lactamase producers) and M. catarrhalis (96.3% were beta-lactamase producers), the MIC90s of moxifloxacin, amoxycillin and co-amoxiclav were 0.094 and 0.125 mg/l, 64 and 8 mg/l, and 1.5 and 0.25 mg/l, respectively. Against oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus and K. pneumoniae, the MIC90s of moxifloxacin were 0.125 and 0.84 mg/l respectively. Moxifloxacin had the highest in vitro activity of all antibiotics tested.     

Minimal inhibitory concentrations and time-kill determination of moxifloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic isolates

Moxifloxacin is a new oral 8-methoxy-quinolone with a wide spectrum of activity against Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria, atypical micro-organisms and multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This study was designed to assess the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria with different resistance patterns, anaerobes and atypical micro-organisms such as Chlamydia and Mycoplasma. Moxifloxacin had good activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae with all strains inhibited by < or =0.12 mg/l. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of moxifloxacin for Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae ranged from 0.03 to 0.5 mg/l while those of ciprofloxacin were about two- to four-fold higher (MICs=0.12-1 mg/l). Moxifloxacin was poorly active against enterococci but its activity against Clostridium and Bacteroides spp. was in the same range as that of metronidazole and superior to that of clindamycin. Moxifloxacin was substantially more active than both ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin against Chlamydia.     

Synthesis and in-vitro antibacterial activity of 7-(3-aminopyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazol-5(2H,4H,6H)-yl)-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid derivatives

A series of novel 7-(3-aminopyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazol-5(2H,4H,6H)-yl)-6-fluoro-4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid derivatives was designed, synthesized and characterized by (1)H-NMR, MS and HRMS. These fluoroquinolones were evaluated for their in-vitro antibacterial activity against representative Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Generally, all of the target compounds display rather weak potency against the tested Gram-negative strains, but most of them exhibit good potency in inhibiting the growth of S. aureus including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis including methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) (MIC: 0.125-8 μg/mL). In particular, the compound 9g is 2 to 32 fold more potent than gemifloxacin (GM), moxifloxacin (MX), gatifloxacin (GT), and levofloxacin (LV) against S. pneumoniae 08-3, K. pneumoniae 09-23, and P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, 4 to 32 fold more potent than MX, GM, and LV against K. pneumoniae 09-21, and more active than or comparable to the four reference drugs against P. aeruginosa 09-32.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin against 4151 Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms

Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin are fluoroquinolones with enhanced Gram-positive activity while retaining broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are older quinolones with broad activity against Gram-negative pathogens and borderline activity against some Gram-positive organisms. We compared the in vitro activity of these compounds against 4151 Gram-negative and -positive organisms. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were highly active against penicillin sensitive and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were active but less potent. All compounds were highly active (overall) against Gram-negative pathogens with ciprofloxacin being the most active agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our data indicate that the advanced fluoroquinolones will be important compounds for treating infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.