闭合复位经皮因定治疗肱骨髁上骨折的进展

肱骨髁上骨折是儿童肘部最常见的骨折,随着微创技术的进展,为了减少并发症和手术创伤,近年来闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定术在临床中得到了广泛的应用.本文查阅了儿童肱骨髁上骨折的相关文献,对肱骨髁上骨折的分类标准、闭合复位方法与参考标准、各种经皮克氏针内固定的进针技术及其疗效,以及闭合复位经皮内固定治疗的并发症与防治措施等研究进展做一综述.     

Comparison of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and percutaneous pinning in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.

A retrospective review of 29 children with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures was performed. Fifteen patients treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and 14 patients treated with open reduction and percutaneous pinning were evaluated at a minimum of 18 months (range 18-80 months). Results were graded according to the criteria of Flynn et al. (Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL: Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 56:263-272, 1974) using both cosmetic and functional evaluations. Excellent or good results were obtained in 14 of the 15 fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and in 12 of the 14 fractures treated with open reduction and percutaneous pinning. The three fair cosmetic results were associated with inadequate reduction and residual medial angulation. Ten to 15 degrees of motion loss occurred in three older patients. One patient in each group had a minor pintract infection. There were no cases of iatrogenic nerve injury or myositis ossificans. The treatment goal in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children is anatomic reduction. If an anatomic reduction cannot be achieved with closed reduction, open reduction is indicated. This can be done without an increased risk of complications.     

Early results of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning

Background:

Displaced supracondylar fractures are notorious for difficulty in reduction, maintenance of reduction and frequent involvement of neurovascular structures. No general agreement on the treatment is evident with controversy prevailing regarding the ideal timing of surgery, method of maintenance of reduction and configuration of the pin fixation. A crossed pin configuration, though believed by some to be mechanically more stable than the lateral pins alone, has the risk of ulnar nerve injury due to the medial pin. Lateral pins alone impart less rotational stability to the fracture although it has been attributed mainly to technical errors of pin placement. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of treatment of this fracture using one lateral and one trans-olecranon K-wires or lateral entry K-wires alone.

Materials and Methods:

Ninety cases of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 6.7 years (range 3–12 years). The male/female ratio was 5:1 and left side was involved in 70% whereas 30% had right sided injuries. The most common mode of trauma was fall from height with elbow in extension. All the 90 consecutively admitted patients had extension type injury with 73.3% fractures being Gartland type III and 26.7% were type II. Posteromedial displacement was noted in 70% whereas 30% fractures were posterolaterally displaced. In 60 cases, lateral entry wires alone were used whereas, in 30 cases, one lateral and another transolecranon transarticular K-wire was used. K-wires were removed at 3 weeks postoperatively and followup was done at 6 weeks and 12 weeks when they were evaluated according to the criteria described by Flynn. Chi-square test was used as a statistical test of significance to compare results among different variables.

Results:

Results were graded according to Flynn''s criteria. Excellent results were achieved in 12 (13.3%), good in 54 (60%), fair in 15 (16.7%) while in nine patients (10%) poor results were obtained.

Conclusions:

Both lateral entry K-wires and lateral-trans-olecranon wire techniques provide stable fixation when observing the guidelines for wire placement and consistently satisfactory results can be obtained, both cosmetically and functionally with both the techniques.     

Close reduction and percutaneous pinning in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children

BackgroundDisplaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are common pediatric injuries treated by orthopedic surgeons. They also have a high rate of complications if not reduced and stabilized in optimal position which may lead to serious neurovascular injuries and residual deformity. Amongst the various methods used for treating these fractures, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning has shown improved results.MethodBetween March 2005 and April 2010, 277 cases of supracondylar humeral fractures (Gartland grade II and III) with less then 1 week old were included in this study. They were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning with crossed Kirschner wires under image intensifier control. Clinical outcome were assessed according to Flynn's criteria.ResultsThe mean age at the time of operation was 6 years (range 2–10 years) and the average duration of follow-up was 4.6 years (range 2.1–7.2 years). The Flynn's criteria were excellent in 202, good in 68, fair in 5 and only 2 with poor results.ConclusionClosed reduction and percutaneous pinning is a sound and effective treatment for displaced supracondylar fractures.     

Supracondylar humerus fractures in children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are important for frequency and type of associated serious complications. The management of this kind of fractures is still controversial (Skaggs et al. in J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:702–707, 2004; Kalllio et al. in J Pediatr Orthop 12:11–15, 1992). We are going to present our experience in the treatment of supracondylar humeral fracture in children. In the Orthopedic Department of Pisa, we treated 150 cases from 1989 to 2006. We are used to perform, emergency or within 12 h, reduction and two lateral-entry percutaneous pins fixation. The mean age was 7.5 years. We checked 125 cases, because we excluded all the cases with follow up less then 5 years. The mean follow up was 8.2 years. We used Gartland classification modified by Wilkins. We evaluated 125 cases by using the Flynn classification: 100 % of patients did not have impairment of the elbow joint mobility. We had seven valgus deviation, one of which was more then 10°. We also had 17 varus deviations, 11 of which were not over 8° and only 2 of them were 15°. The average value of the joint Baumann angle was calculated as great as 16°. The obtained results were classified as very good 80 %, good 11 %, sufficiently good 6 %, and bad 3 %. In our experience, all the fractures type II and III by Gartland have to be treated within 12 h, with closed reduction and stabilization with lateral-entry K-wire technique. The conservative treatment by cast is indicated only in type I fracture. The trans olecranic treatment is not realizable, for the stiffness which can occur, for the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve lesion, and for long-time hospitalization. The open reduction remains the first choice treatment for exposed or nonreducible fractures, and in cases of vascular injury.     

Displaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: biomechanical analysis of percutaneous pinning techniques

Supracondylar humerus fractures are a common childhood occurrence. Displaced fractures are typically treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Controversy continues over the appropriateness of various pinning techniques. The most common include crossed or lateral pins. A biomechanical comparison of crossed pins, "parallel" lateral pins, and "divergent" lateral pins was performed using a pediatric synthetic bone model. Mechanical testing of each pin configuration was performed in extension, varus, valgus, internal rotation, and external rotation. The divergent configuration provided statistically greater stability than parallel pins under varus and valgus loading. Divergent pins had similar stability compared with crossed pins in extension, varus, and valgus testing. In axial rotation testing, crossed pins were more stable. If the surgeon feels confident in the ability of lateral pins to provide satisfactory fracture stability, divergent lateral pins provide greater stability than parallel lateral pins while avoiding ulnar nerve injury (associated with crossed pins).     

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children with delayed presentation

Objective: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus account for 60% of all the fractures around the pediatric elbow and even in developed countries 18% of patients undergo surgery 48 hours or longer following presentation in the hospital. Management guidelines are not clear yet for these patients who present late. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical, radiological and functional outcome following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of widely displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus presenting 12 hours or more after injury.Methods: We reviewed the functional and radiological results of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning using crossed K-wires in 40 patients with displaced extension type supracondylar fracture of the humerus (Gartland type Ⅲ) with a delay of more than 12 hours in presentation. The average age of patients was 4.5 years and the mean delay in presentation was 17.55 hours.Results: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning was successful in 90% of patients. The mean follow up period was 15 months. The Baumann's angle was restored within 4 degrees of the unaffected side in all patients. Use of a small medial incision in patients with severe swelling helped us avoid ulnar nerve injury. Using Flynn's criteria,38 patients (95%) had an excellent result. Two patients had mild myositis and both had a poor result. None of the patients developed cubitus varus.Conclusion: Closed reduction and crossed pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of humerus in children is a safe and effective method even with delayed presentation.     

经皮克氏针固定治疗Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折

[目的]探讨闭合复位经皮克氏针固定治疗Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的方法和治疗结果。[方法]自2003年6月～2005年6月，采用闭合复位经皮克氏针固定技术治疗Gartland Ⅲ型儿童肱骨髁上骨折47例。患儿平均年龄为6．8岁（3～12岁），均为闭合伸直型，在X线透视下，先行闭合复位骨折，然后经皮穿入2枚交叉克氏针固定。[结果]46例获得随访，随访9—21个月，平均15个月。术后无缺血性挛缩，3例发生轻度肘内翻，2例出现尺神经麻痹，4个月后自行恢复。按Flynn评分，优30例，良16例，一般3例。[结论]采用闭合复位经皮克氏针固定治疗肱骨髁上骨折，能避免骨折远端向尺侧的再移位，消除了肘内翻形成的因素，创伤小，并发症少，肘关节功能恢复满意。     

Comparison between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pinning in children with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial

This was a randomized controlled trial of 28 children 1 year to 12 years of age with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fracture. The purpose of the study was to compare closed reduction and pinning (group A) and open reduction and pinning (group B). Each group consisted of 14 children. The general characteristics of both groups (age, sex side, displacement, nerve injury preoperatively) were statistically the same (P > 0.05). All cases healed with good alignment without cubitus varus, without infection and with a good range of motion except for one. The mean +/- standard deviation of the Baumann's angle difference between the injured and uninjured side were 2.32 +/- 1.6 degrees in group A (range, 0-6.5 degrees) and 2.45 +/- 1.8 degrees in group B (range, 0-6.5 degrees). This difference was statistically not significant (P = 0.8). By Flynn criteria, group A had good to excellent results in 100%, and group B had good to excellent results in 93% and fair in 7%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). The satisfaction score (0-10) was significantly higher in group A for both parents' and evaluator's (blinded to treatment) perspective (P = 0.017 and 0.019, respectively). The author concludes that both treatments gave good results. Closed reduction should be performed first and, if it fails, then open reduction can be performed. This will produce good results in the hands of an experienced surgeon.     

Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning

Introduction In the literature the best results for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures have been achieved by closed reduction and wire fixation. However, in these reports the patient group of open reduction and pinning contained the patients who had had previous ineffective closed reduction trials. This retrospective study compared open and closed reduction with pinning, in which the first group of patients was all consecutively treated with open reduction.Materials and methods The study included 99 children with displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of humerus who had complete follow-up. Open reduction patients had not had a previous attempted closed reduction. Open reduction and pinning were performed through a posteromedial incision in the first 44 patients and closed reduction and pinning in the subsequent 55 patients. Mean duration surgery was 15 h with open reduction and 17 h with closed reduction. Mean follow up was 35 months with the open reduction and 21 months with closed reduction. Humeral-ulnar angle was compared to the contralateral elbow, clinical flexion deficiency and extension lag, and complications were evaluated.Results At the latest follow-up the open group had an average of 5.1° valgus change and the closed group 3.6° valgus change in humeral-ulnar angle compared to their uninvolved elbow. Average flexion deficiency was 8.61° in the open and 5.25° in the closed group. Average extension lag was 6.23° in the open and 0.6° in the closed group. Functional results were satisfactory in 71% of patients in the open and 93% of those in the closed reduction group. Cosmetic results were satisfactory in 95% of both groups.Conclusions Closed reduction and pinning is superior to open reduction and pinning for the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. In the case of technical insufficiencies open reduction and pinning through a posteromedial incision is an alternative treatment for decreasing the surgical time and complications. Complications was not caused in either group by the delayed surgical timing compared to reports in the literature.     

Routine radiographs at time of pin removal after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Radiographs are usually taken on day of pin removal for children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of type 2 supracondylar humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiographs taken at time of pin removal for patients recovering uneventfully alter management.

Methods

After IRB approval, billing records identified 1213 patients aged 1–10 years who underwent elbow surgery between 2007 and 2013 at our institution for a supracondylar humerus fracture. Of these patients, 389 met inclusion criteria. Clinical charts were reviewed for demographics, operative details, and clinical follow-up, focusing on clinical symptoms present at pin removal. Radiographs taken at time of pin removal and subsequent visits were assessed for healing and fracture alignment.

Results

In no case was pin removal delayed based on radiographs. One hundred and nineteen (31 %) patients had radiographs taken following pin removal; in no case was loss of reduction found among these patients. No cases of neurologic or vascular injury, re-fracture, or loss of reduction occurred. Infection occurred in 12 patients (3 %). Pins were kept in place for 23.8 ± 4.4 days. Eighty-six patients (22 %) had additional intervention after pin removal (cast application in all cases). Of 389 patients, 75 (19 %) had no documented reason for extended casting, four (1 %) were extended based on physician evaluation of radiographs, and seven (2 %) were extended for other reasons.

Conclusions

Elimination of radiographs at time of pin removal should be considered. If continuing to obtain radiographs at pin removal, we recommend removing pins before taking radiographs to reduce patient fear and anxiety from visualizing percutaneous pins.

     

Techniques for direct radiographic visualization during closed pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures in children

After reduction of a displaced supracondylar humerus fracture, the distal humerus must be easy to visualize; radiographic techniques in which the forearm overlaps the distal humerus make interpretation of fracture reduction difficult. Eighteen patients with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures were treated with reduction that was maintained manually with a variant of Dunlop's extension traction. This allows direct fluoroscopic evaluation of Baumann's angle, the contour of the distal humerus, the pin insertion site, and the angle of pin insertion. In young patients with a thin distal humerus and swollen elbow, the easiest pin placement may be achieved by inserting the pin on the lateral view (after the anteroposterior view confirms a satisfactory reduction).     

Deformity and function in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children variously treated by closed reduction and splinting, traction, and percutaneous pinning.

The radiographs of 137 patients with supracondylar fractures of the humerus treated by closed reduction and splinting, traction, and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) were reviewed to determine the adequacy of the initial reduction and the maintenance of the reduction. Eighty-four patients were examined for function and deformity. Initially, Baumann's angle was adequate and similar in all patients, but the humerocapitellar angle was better with CRPP. Maintenance of reduction in both planes was superior with CRPP, and significantly better clinical results were achieved by CRPP. Nevertheless, there was no functional loss in any patient, and no parent wanted correction of deformity.     

闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗儿童不稳定肱骨髁上骨折

目的探讨C臂X线机透视下闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗不稳定儿童肱骨髁上骨折的疗效。方法C臂X线机透视下闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定术治疗儿童不稳定肱骨髁上骨折35例。结果35例均获随访,时间7～13个月。术后无缺血性挛缩,3例出现针孔渗出较多,经加强换药后痊愈。无一例出现肘内翻、尺神经损伤。按Flynn标准评价：优20例,良15例,无一般及差病例。结论C臂X线机透视下闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗儿童不稳定肱骨髁上骨折手术创伤小,固定可靠,可以获得良好的肘关节功能和外形。     

闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗伸直型肱骨髁上骨折

目的 探讨闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗儿童伸直型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效.方法 对29例伸直型肱骨髁上骨折患儿(Pirone分型:Ⅱb型8例,Ⅲ型21例)均作闭合复位、透视下经皮克氏针内固定,并予石膏托外固定.结果 26例获得随访,时间6～36个月.骨折均愈合,愈合时间6～8周,未出现缺血性肌肉挛缩.按Flynn标准评定疗效:优19例,良5例,可2例.结论 闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定治疗儿童重度移位的伸直型肱骨髁上骨折疗效较好.     

Completely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children: results of open reduction versus closed reduction

 This retrospective study was performed to understand the clinical results after closed reduction and open reduction in 35 children (mean age 6.4 years) with completely displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus between 1996 and 2000. Closed reduction (21 cases) was attempted, with open reduction (14 cases) indicated in irreducible cases with or without severe swelling. After an average follow-up of 22 months, according to Flynn's criteria, the results were excellent in 18, good in 12, fair in 2, and poor in 3. The satisfactory results rates were similar for closed and open reduction. The unsatisfactory results were related to the poor initial reduction and redisplacement after operation. The mean Baumann's angle was 8.7° in the closed reduction group and 6.6° in the open reduction group. None of the patients showed restricted elbow motion of more than 10°, even in two cases of hypertrophic scar in the open reduction group. Selective open reduction for displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus produced as good results as closed reduction. Received: January 7, 2002 / Accepted: November 20, 2002 Offprint requests to: C-W. Oh     

Fracture stability after pinning of displaced supracondylar distal humerus fractures in children

Between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1997, we evaluated 138 children with displaced supracondylar distal humerus fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. There were 49 type II fractures and 89 type III fractures. Three principal pin configurations were used at the surgeon's discretion: 2 lateral pins (42 fractures), 1 medial and 1 lateral pin (37 fractures), and 1 medial and 2 lateral pins (57 fractures). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical stability between these groups. One type III fracture pinned using two lateral pins showed marked rotational instability. We recommend using two lateral pins when treating type II fractures. Type III fractures should be treated using two lateral pins initially and, if the elbow demonstrates significant intraoperative rotational instability, a medial pin should be added. If a medial pin is necessary, and the ulnar nerve cannot be identified by palpation, a small incision should be made and the pin placed under direct vision.