Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Microarray profiling of invasive breast carcinomas has identified subtypes including luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and basal-like. The poor-prognosis, basal-like tumors have been immunohistochemically characterized as estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, HER2/neu-negative, and cytokeratin 5/6-positive and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ in a population-based series of cases using immunohistochemical surrogates. A total of 245 pure ductal carcinoma in situ cases from a population-based, case-control study were evaluated for histologic characteristics and immunostained for ER, HER2/neu, EGFR, cytokeratin 5/6, p53, and Ki-67. The subtypes were defined as: luminal A (ER+, HER2-), luminal B (ER+, HER2+), HER2 positive (ER-, HER2+), and basal-like (ER-, HER2-, EGFR+, and/or cytokeratin 5/6+). The prevalence of breast cancer subtypes was basal-like (n = 19 [8%]); luminal A, n = 149 (61%); luminal B, n = 23 (9%); and HER2+/ER-, n = 38 (16%). Sixteen tumors (6%) were unclassified (negative for all 4 defining markers). The basal-like subtype was associated with unfavorable prognostic variables including high-grade nuclei (P < .0001), p53 overexpression (P < .0001), and elevated Ki-67 index (P < .0001). These studies demonstrate the presence of a basal-like in situ carcinoma, a potential precursor lesion to invasive basal-like carcinoma.     

Factors associated with residual disease after initial breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ

Breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy has become a standard treatment option in women with localized ductal carcinoma in situ. Re-excision is common in breast-conserving surgery, partly due to lack of consensus on what might constitute an adequate margin. In this study, we aimed to identify potential predictive factors for presence/absence of residual disease after initial breast-conserving surgery. Of 232 cases with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ without invasive carcinoma at initial biopsy between 2005 and 2009, 108 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, of which 46 had re-excisions due to close margins (≤ 2 mm). The notable features significantly associated with ductal carcinoma in situ residuum (19/46; 41%) on univariate logistic regression analysis included the number of close margins, the percentage of sections with ductal carcinoma in situ, and the number of duct spaces with ductal carcinoma in situ (no. of ductal carcinoma in situ ducts) at close margins. Only the percentage of sections with ductal carcinoma in situ remained a significant factor associated with outcomes on multivariate analysis, whereas the number of ductal carcinoma in situ ducts at close margins held borderline predictive value (P = .054). Furthermore, logistic regression and classification and regression tree analysis using the 10-fold cross validation method revealed optimal predicting accuracy by using the 3 significant factors in univariate analysis. The final decision tree was constructed by using the number of ductal carcinoma in situ ducts at close margins and the percentage of sections with ductal carcinoma in situ. Thus, these 2 factors represent the most powerful predictors for residual disease on re-excision. Optimal discriminatory power for prediction of absence of residual disease was achieved with cutoffs of 18 ductal carcinoma in situ ducts at close margins and 51.3% sections with ductal carcinoma in situ.     

Knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Objective

To assess knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to explore the factors associated with less knowledge and greater confusion about DCIS.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of women diagnosed with DCIS in Australia (N = 144).

Results

This study found misunderstanding and confusion amongst women diagnosed with DCIS and a desire for more information about their breast disease. Approximately half of participants worried about their breast disease metastasizing; approximately half expressed high decisional conflict; 12% were anxious and 2% were depressed. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that worry about dying from the breast disease was significantly associated with not knowing that DCIS could not metastasize (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.03-14.25); and confusion about whether DCIS could metastasize was significantly associated with dissatisfaction with information (OR 12.5; 95% CI 3.8-40.2).

Conclusion

Good communication about how DCIS differs from invasive breast cancer is essential to alleviating the confusion and worry amongst women with DCIS.

Practice implications

Recommendations about how best to communicate a diagnosis of DCIS, including the uncertainties, are needed to guide health professionals to promote better understanding about DCIS and increase the well-being of women with DCIS.     

Predictors of disease progression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and vascular patterns

Breast carcinoma-induced angiogenesis helps meet growing metabolic needs of tumors and progressively increases with malignant transformation of benign ducts to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma. There are conflicting data regarding the difference in angiogenesis in low-, intermediate-, and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. If angiogenesis is related to ductal carcinoma in situ progression, the types of ductal carcinoma in situ with more aggressive biologic potential would have different vascular patterns than the less aggressive ones. In this study, we classified 51 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ as low (10-20 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), moderate, or high aggressive (2-5 years to progression to invasive carcinoma), based on criteria outlined by Tsikitis and Chung (Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29:305), which takes into account nuclear grade, mitotic rate, Ki-67, Her2Neu, P53, estrogen, and progesterone receptor expression. We correlated these 3 groups of ductal carcinoma in situ with the extent of periductal and stromal vascularity and the presence and type of vascular breaks. No association of aggressive biologic behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ with any vascular pattern was found. Moreover, no correlation was found between vascular patterns and classifiers of aggressiveness, microvascular density, or outcome (local recurrence, invasive carcinoma, or metastatic disease). To validate our cohort, we confirmed expected correlations of all measured parameters of aggressiveness by correlating them with each other. In summary, vascular patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ do not correlate with the predictors of aggressive behavior, suggesting that the biologic potential of ductal carcinoma in situ is independent of angiogenesis.     

Genetic pathways in the evolution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

The patterns of allelic loss in 28 cases of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 cases of DCIS associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were compared, in order to define whether pure DCIS represented an earlier stage than DCIS associated with IDC in the progression of breast carcinoma. To this aim, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on microdissected normal and neoplastic breast tissue, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Fifteen microsatellite markers were examined, on chromosomes 1p, 3p, 7q, 11q, 12p, 13q, 16q and 17q, mostly focused on regions altered in breast cancer. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was greater in pure DCIS than in the DCIS component associated with IDC for 11 out of 15 markers. The difference was statistically significant for D13S260 and D17S800 (p=0.008 and p=0.01, respectively). DCIS associated with IDC showed a lesser degree of alteration than the synchronous IDC component for ten out of 15 markers. In contrast, LOH at D11S1816 and D16S318 was lower in pure DCIS than in DCIS associated with IDC and even greater in the IDC component. These results confirm that DCIS is a possible but not an obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer and suggest that pure DCIS and DCIS associated with IDC may be genetically distinct. The evolution from DCIS to IDC may follow multiple pathways and not a linear model.     

CD24 expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: an immunohistochemistry-based pilot study

CD24 is a small, heavily glycosylated cell surface protein, that is expressed in a large variety of solid tumors. It is considered to play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis. We aimed to evaluate CD24 expression in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCa), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and non-tumorous breast tissues, and to investigate the relationship between histopathological parameters, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and c-erbB2 expressions. The study included 34 IDCa, 25 DCIS, and 13 non-tumorous breast tissues. All cases were reevaluated histopathologically, and immunohistochemistry was performed with monoclonal CD24 antibody. The results clearly demonstrated that CD24 expression, including membranous and cytoplasmic staining, was significantly higher in DCIS and IDCa than in the non-tumorous breast (p=0.001, p=0.000, and p=0.035, p=0.000, respectively). Cytoplasmic staining was detected predominantly in neoplastic tissues and was significantly increased in high grade DCIS (p=0.013). In invasive carcinomas, although the level of membranous staining was significantly positively correlated with tumor grade (p=0.040), there was no such an association with the cytoplasmic level. However, it showed a trend towards pT (p=0.089). In conclusion, our results suggest that higher CD24 expression may be associated with malignant transformation and progression in breast cancer biology. Furthermore, higher membranous expression and, in particular, cytoplasmic staining seem to predict malignant transformation, and different patterns of CD24 expression may be associated with different pathological features in breast tumors.     

Comparative features of comedo and noncomedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

To determine whether fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) can differentiate between comedo (C-DCIS) and noncomedo ductal carcinoma in situ (NC-DCIS), we reviewed retrospectively the preoperative FNAB and surgical biopsy slides of 13 cases of DCIS with adequate cytologic material. Eight were NC-DCIS and 5 were C-DCIS. Three (60 percent) of the C-DCIS and 7 (88%) of the NC-DCIS were nonpalpable lesions biopsied under conventional mammographic guidance. Three (60%) of the C-DCIS but only 2 (25%) of the NC-DCIS were considered either suspicious or positive for malignancy on FNAB, the remainder in both groups being atypical. A statistically significant difference in marked nuclear pleomorphism (60% of C-DCIS vs. 0% of NC-DCIS, P = 0.04) and large nucleoli (60% of C-DCIS vs. 0% of NC-DCIS, P = 0.04) was observed between these 2 groups. DCIS is morphologically diverse, and it appears that the cytologic features of individual cells on FNAB may distinguish C-DCIS from NC-DCIS.     

Large palpable ductal carcinoma in situ is Her-2 positive with high nuclear grade

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogeneous group with variable clinical presentation. The exact molecular mechanism is not known why some ductal carcinomas may reach to such a large size but still remains in situ. Although, molecular classification of DCIS lesions and nuclear grading are important for identification of more aggressive lesions but it is not sufficient. Our aim was to examine the expression pattern of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of ER, PR, HER-2 in palpable DCIS lesions and compare with clinicopathological findings. Our center is referral hospital from South of Iran. Samples were obtained from fifty four patients with a diagnosis of palpable DCIS. Equivocal (2+) case in HER-2 IHC testing was more characterized by chromogenic in situ hybridization. The positive frequency of HER2, ER, and PR was 92%, 48%, and 37% respectively. Palpable DCIS lesions were significantly more HER-2 positive (92%). The DCIS cases were more likely to be of high nuclear grade (grade III) and Her-2 positive cases were more likely to be of high nuclear grade than intermediate grade. All ER negative tumors had high nuclear grade. The Her-2 positivity is suggested as the most important factor responsible for marked in situ proliferation and production of palpable mass.     

A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma

The in-situ component of 180 cases of screen detected infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast was classified according to six published classifications for ductal carcinoma in situ based on architecture, necrosis and cytology. All cases were assessed independently by two experienced observers to assess inter-observer variation. The differentiation of ductal carcinoma in situ as assessed by all the classification systems correlated with the grade of the associated invasive carcinoma (chi-squared between 50 and 107: P <0.0001). Disagreements were commonest in the assessment of architecture and least common in the assessment of necrosis. For cytonuclear grade most disagreements (62.2%) involved the distinction between low and intermediate as against 33.9% disagreements for intermediate vs. high. Nuclear grade alone and necrosis alone were correlated with the grade of invasive carcinoma associated with the ductal carcinoma in situ and the Nottingham prognostic index of the patient. The Van Nuys classification of ductal carcinoma in situ is commended because it has a low inter-observer disagreement, is significantly correlated with the grade of the infiltrating carcinoma, uses simple well-defined criteria (with no requirement for percentage estimations), is applicable to small numbers of ducts and, most importantly, appears to correlate with disease-free survival.     

Genomic alterations and phenotype of large compared to small high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ

A clinically distinct subgroup of pure ductal carcinoma in situ presents as an extensive, high-grade lesion, which nevertheless lacks invasion. We sought to evaluate differences between those ductal carcinomas in situ presenting as large versus small lesions while controlling for high-grade, to determine whether there exist phenotypic and genetic differences between the 2 groups. Fifty-two cases of pure high-grade ductal carcinomas in situ were collected retrospectively, consisting of 27 large (>40 mm) and 25 small (<15 mm) cases. The 2 groups were compared based on genomic copy number assessed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization and by phenotype determined by immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, p53, cyclin D1, p16, cyclooxygenase 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and CD68. Large lesions presented at a younger age, with lower incidence of comedonecrosis and periductal macrophage response. Larger lesions also had significantly lower estrogen receptor expression, lower cyclin D1 expression, and lower Ki-67 index. The subset of 9 large palpable tumors had significantly lower p16/cyclooxygenase 2 expression and lower Ki-67 index compared to nonpalpable tumors. Genomically, larger lesions had fewer break points, fewer amplifications, and decreased copy number gains involving chromosome 8q and chromosome 20q when compared to the small lesions. Among pure high-grade tumors, small and large groups show specific genomic and phenotypic differences. Interestingly, larger tumors showed some molecular features associated with better prognosis. A more thorough evaluation of these differences could help identify the likelihood of recurrence or progression for in situ lesions.     

C-KIT expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: co-expression with HER-2/neu

The proto-oncogene c-KIT (CD117) is highly expressed in normal breast epithelium and is decreased in invasive breast cancer. In this study, we analyzed the protein expression and the mutational status of c-KIT in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast and correlated these findings with nuclear grade, architectural pattern, and expression of HER-2, estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha, and progesterone receptor (PR). C-KIT, HER-2, ER, and PR expression were analyzed immunohistochemically in 106 cases of paraffin-embedded DCIS (85 pure DCIS and 21 DCIS with concurrent carcinoma). Direct sequencing of exons 9 and 11 of the c-KIT gene was performed to analyze the hot spot mutational regions in representative cases. C-KIT expression was found in 55 (52.8%) of all DCIS, correlating with high nuclear grade (P < .0001), comedonecrosis (P < .0001), and solid growth pattern (P = .001). Furthermore, c-KIT expression was strongly associated with HER-2 positivity (P < .0001) and was significantly lower in ER- or PR-positive cases (P = .001 and P = .006, respectively). C-KIT expression alone or co-expression with HER-2 in pure DCIS did not differ significantly from DCIS with invasive component (P = .09). Mutational analysis in 6 c-KIT-positive DCIS revealed no activating mutations in exons 9 or 11. Our findings suggest that the expression of c-KIT protein might define a subset of poorly differentiated, HER-2-positive DCIS with decreased expression of steroid hormone receptors, comedonecrosis, and a solid growth pattern. The implications of c-KIT and HER-2 co-expression for breast carcinogenesis should be further evaluated.     

Widespread chromosomal abnormalities in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Comparative genomic hybridization study of pure high-grade DCIS

For a variety of technical reasons it is rarely possible to study cytogenetic abnormalities in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using traditional techniques. However, by combining molecular biology and computerized image analysis it is possible to carry out cytogenetic analyses on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of chromosomal amplifications and deletions in high-grade DCIS and to look specifically for unique or consistent abnormalities in this pre-invasive cancer. Twenty-three cases of asymptomatic, non-palpable, screen-detected, high-grade DCIS were examined using CGH on tumour cells obtained from histology slides. All cases showed chromosomal abnormalities. A wide variety of amplifications and deletions were spread across the genome. The most frequent changes were gains of chromosomes 17 (13 of 23), 16p (13 of 23), and 20q (9 of 23) and amplifications of 11q13 (22 of 23), 12q 24.1–24.2 (12 of 23), 6p21.3 (11 of 23), and 1q31-qter (6 of 23). The most frequent deletions were on 13q 21.3–q33 (7 of 23), 9p21 (4 of 23), and 6q16.1 (4 of 23). These findings indicate that high-grade DCIS is, from a cytogenetic viewpoint, an advanced lesion. There was no absolutely consistent finding in every case, but amplification of 11q13 was found in 22 of the 23 cases. The precise significance of this is unknown at present. This region of chromosome 11q harbours a number of known oncogenes, including cyclinD1 and INT2. It is likely that many of these findings are the result of accumulated chromosomal abnormalities, reflecting an unstable genome in established malignancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Identifying recurrences and metastasis after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a non-invasive tumour that has the potential to progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Thus, it represents a treatment dilemma: alone it does not present a risk to life, however, left untreated it may progress to a life-threatening condition. Current clinico-pathological features cannot accurately predict which patients with DCIS have invasive potential, and therefore clinicians are unable to quantify the risk of progression for an individual patient. This leads to many women being over-treated, while others may not receive sufficient treatment to prevent invasive recurrence. A better understanding of the molecular features of DCIS, both tumour-intrinsic and the microenvironment, could offer the ability to better predict which women need aggressive treatment, and which can avoid therapies carrying significant side-effects and such as radiotherapy. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge of DCIS, and consider future research directions.     

Costimulatory molecule OX40/OX40L expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: An immunohistochemistry-based pilot study

OX40, a membrane-bound member of the tumor-necrosis-factor-receptor (TNFR) superfamily, plays an important role in proliferation, survival and infiltration of activated T cells via binding to OX40L. Recent studies indicate that OX40/OX40L system mediates the adhesion and infiltration of adult T cell leukemia (ATL). Previously, we detected OX40 expression in breast carcinoma cell lines and tissues. The correlation of expression of OX40 and OX40L and clinical features in breast carcinogenesis, however, has not been well characterized. The expression of OX40 and OX40L in 107 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCa), 9 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 31 fibroadenomas from breast tissues and its relationship with the clinical features were determined using immunohistochemistry (peroxidase-conjugated polymer method, ChemMate™ Envision™ Detection kit). The positive immunostaining rates for OX40 in IDCa, DCIS and fibroadenomas from breast tissues were 85.0%, 66.7% and 38.7% respectively, showing a significant difference in OX40 expression among IDCa, DCIS and fibroadenoma of breast (z = 5.206, P = 0.001). Increased staining intensity of OX40 was associated with TNM stages (z = 2.112, P = 0.017). Meanwhile, a relation of OX40 expression with lymph node metastatic status in IDCa was found (P = 0.041). The expression of OX40L did not show any obvious difference among IDCa, DCIS and fibroadenomas from breast tissues. OX40L expression was also not related to histopathological parameters in IDCa except for progesterone receptor (PR) being positive (P = 0.005). However, a high coincidental positive rate for OX40 and OX40L was observed in biopsy samples with IDCa (P = 0.017, Kappa = 0.231). The present results suggest that high OX40 expression may be associated with malignant transformation, progression, invasion and metastasis in breast cancer biology.     

Evaluation of CD56 and CD57 immunostainings for discrimination between endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma

Endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (E‐DCIS) is an intraductal carcinoma characterized by endocrine features and expression of neuroendocrine markers. E‐DCIS and intraductal papilloma (IDP) resemble in their clinical features. However, the former is an intraductal carcinoma, and the latter is an intraductal benign lesion. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish E‐DCIS from IDP because both can show near solid intraductal cellular proliferation. Discrimination between lesions is important not only histopathologically, but also clinically. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of CD56 and CD57 for the discrimination between E‐DCIS and IDP. Specimens were obtained from 17 E‐DCIS patients as the subject group, and 27 IDP patients as the control group, diagnosed in St Marianna University Hospital. E‐DCIS was diagnosed using Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, and Grimelius stainings by the premise of histopathological features. These specimens were subjected to CD56, CD57 immunostainings. Staining results were compared between E‐DCIS and IDP. In our study, CD56 revealed significant differences for distinguishing E‐DCIS from IDP as determined by Fisher's test (cutoff: not less than 33–67%< immunopositivity, P < 0.05). We found that not only E‐DCIS but also IDP revealed immunopositivity for CD56. However, it is considered that E‐DCIS diagnosis is possible by diffuse immunopositivity of CD56 after having been based on histopathology.     

The impact of large sections on the study of in situ and invasive duct carcinoma of the breast

Large histologic sections (LHSs) are increasingly used in the study of normal and neoplastic breast tissue. LHSs allow the direct visualization of a large part of the breast glandular tree. Accordingly, LHSs have shown that in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma is a multilobar (and hence multifocal) neoplastic lesion in more than 50% of the cases, and that poorly differentiated duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS grade 3) is frequently unifocal, whereas it is often multifocal when the in situ lesion is a well-differentiated type (DCIS grade 1). Forty-five mastectomies were studied with large sections. Mastectomies were performed when quadrantectomy did not guarantee radical excision of the tumor with adequate cosmesis because of the large size of the lesion or because the neoplastic lesion was located below the nipple. Excluded were cases of lobular neoplasia or invasive lobular carcinoma, because they were reported separately, and cases of mastectomies performed for sarcoma or recurrent phyllodes tumor. All cases had undergone a preoperative diagnostic procedure (fine needle aspiration), and the relative positive material was reviewed. All 45 cases showed in situ duct carcinoma and 37 showed evidence of invasive duct carcinoma. Forty-two cases of DCIS were multifocal, whereas only 4 invasive duct carcinoma were shown as multifocal. When DCIS lesions were subdivided into 3 grades, no statistical significance was seen among the 3 groups of DCIS in regard to multifocality. Nevertheless, DCIS grade 1 was a widespread condition involving more than one lobe and quadrant, whereas DCIS grades 2 and 3 appeared more localized. DCIS grade 1 was more similar to that previously observed in lobular in situ neoplasia/lobular in situ carcinoma. In 66.6% of the cases, DCIS foci were found within the invasive areas, indicating a more than fortuitous occurrence (2-sided P=.0357).     

Atypical cystic lobules: an early stage in the formation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ

Evidence from many studies has established the neoplastic potential of ductal carcinoma in situ, but the origin and the morphological characteristics of the early stages of this proliferation remain unidentified. Workers writing in the early twentieth century observed a cystic transformation of lobules and proposed that it represented one such early stage, and contemporary European and Japanese pathologists have reached the same conclusion. We describe the characteristics of this cystic transformation, which we call us “atypical cystic lobules,” and present evidence to support the proposal that the alteration is a step in the formation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Atypical cystic lobules are a proliferation of luminal cells showing low-grade cytological atypia without architectural atypia. The study group comprised 21 cases of atypical cystic lobules from specimens also showing conventional low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ or lobular neoplasia. Immunohistochemical staining for hormone receptors, keratin 19, and cyclin D1 revealed that atypical cystic lobules demonstrated a consistent immunophenotype, which differs from the pattern shown by normal lobules and benign lesions and matches that of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. In about 40% of the cases, atypical cystic lobules merged with fully established micropapillary/cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ. The similarities in the cytological and immunohistochemical features and the proximity of the two types of proliferation suggest that atypical cystic lobules represent an early stage in the formation of certain types of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Received: 5 February 1999 / Accepted: 24 March 1999