Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

ANTAGONISM OF VECURONIUM AND ATRACURIUM: COMPARISON OF NEOSTIGMINE AND EDROPHONIUM ADMINISTERED AT 5% TWITCH HEIGHT RECOVERY

In 39 healthy patients antagonism, by neostig-mine 0.07 mg kg^–1or edrophonium 0.8 mg kg^–1, of neuromuscular blockadeinduced by vecuronium or atracurium, was compared. Reversalwas attempted when the height of the single twitch (TH) hadrecovered spontaneously to 5% of the control value. The evokedresponses, initially single twitch, then train-of-four (TOF)were observed until the TOF ratio was 70%. Induced recoveryfrom TH 5% to 25% was shorter following edrophonium than followingneostigmine with both vecuronium (P < 0.05) and atracurium(P < 0.05). The recovery indices and times until TH was 75%of control and until the TOF ratio was 70% were not different.The time from a TH of 75% to a TOF ratio of 70% was shorterfollowing neostigmine than following edrophonium with both vecuronium(P < 0.01) and atracurium (P < 0.01). Edrophonium hada much more variable effect on vecuronium than on atracurium.These results show that although the onset of action of edrophoniumwas faster than that of neostigmine, this did not lead to afaster clinical recovery, and antagonism by edrophonium maybe delayed in a number of patients if vecuronium is the neuromuscularblocker.     

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparison of edrophonium and neostigmine for the antagonism of atracurium-induced neuromuscular block

Edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, or neostigmine, 0.05 mg/kg, was administered to groups of 20 patients each, for antagonism of atracurium-induced block at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Adequate reversal of neuromuscular block (TOF ratio of 0.7) was achieved in all patients given neostigmine but only in 13 of the 20 given edrophonium. The onset of action of edrophonium (23 sec) was significantly more rapid than that of neostigmine (40 sec), as was the time taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 in those in whom adequate antagonism was achieved (68 sec for edrophonium and 246 sec for neostigmine). Five of the seven patients in the edrophonium group who failed to be reversed adequately had shown three or fewer twitches to a TOF stimulation. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, particularly if all four responses to a TOF stimulation are not elicited prior to antagonism of the block.     

Time to peak effect of neostigmine at antagonism of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Study Objective: (1) To determine the time to peak effect of neostigmine (time to peak antagonism) during atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block; and (2) to determine the effect on time to peak effect of neostigmine during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, when the dose of neostigmine is increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study.

Setting: Gynecologic operating room suite at a university hospital.

Patients: 45 ASA I and II women admitted for gynecologic laparotomy.

Interventions: Anesthesia was performed with thiopental sodium, fentanyl, halothane, nitrous oxide, and atracurium or vecuronium. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and mechanomyography were used to monitor neuromuscular transmission. Neostigmine was administered while a constant degree of neuromuscular block was maintained at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11% of the control twitch height, using a continuous infusion of atracurium or vecuronium. The patients were randomized to three groups, with 15 patients in each group. Group 1 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; group 2 received vecuronium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; and group 3 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 70 μg/kg.

Measurements and Main Results: The degree of neuromuscular block at antagonism was similar in the three groups. Time to peak effect (mean ± SD) on TOF ratio was significantly longer in Group 1 (9.7 ± 3.0 minutes) versus Group 2 (6.6 ± 1.4 minutes; (p < 0.05). The time to peak effect on TOF ratio during atracurium-induced block was reduced from 9.7 ± 3.0 minutes to 6.3 ± 2.0 minutes when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg (p < 0.05). The peak effect on TOF ratio was significantly greater in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05), while it was similar in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion: The time to peak effect of neostigmine 35 μg/kg is about 6 to 10 minutes when antagonizing a constant degree of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11%. Even though the time to peak effect was longer with atracurium than with vecuronium, clinically significant differences between the antagonizing effect of atracurium versus vecuronium block were not demonstrated. The time to peak effect during atracurium-induced block decreased when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of atracurium and cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block

PURPOSE: To study the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by atracurium and cisatracurium. METHODS: One hundred and twenty eight, ASA group 1 or 2 adults were given either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) atracurium or 0.1 mg x kg(-1) cisatracurium during fentanyl-thiopental-nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. The neuromuscular block was measured by an acceleration-responsive transducer. Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in the first twitch (T1) and train-of-four (TOF) response. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg x kg(-1)) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg x kg(-1)) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another sixteen subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. RESULTS: At five minutes, unlike edrophonium, neostigmine was equally effective against atracurium and cisatracurium with respect to T1 recovery. The neostigmine T1-ED50 was 10.3 +/- 1.06 (SEM) microg x kg(-1) after atracurium and 11.2 +/- 1.06) microg x kg(-1) after cisatracurium. The edrophonium ED50 was 157 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with atracurium and 47.4 +/- 1.07 microg x kg(-1) with cisatracurium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 15.2 +/- 1.7 and 4.2 +/- 0.41 (P < 0.001) for atracurium and cisatracurium, respectively. At 10 min neostigmine was 13 +/- 1.4 times as potent as edrophonium for achieving 50% TOF recovery after atracurium paralysis. After cisatracurium the potency ratio was 11.8 +/- 1.3 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were differences at five minutes, neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios at 10 min, were similar in both relaxants studied.     

Dose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of atracurium and vecuronium neuromuscular blockade

To determine the potencies of edrophonium and neostigmine as antagonists of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by atracurium and vecuronium, dose-response curves were constructed for both antagonists when given at 10% spontaneous recovery of first twitch height. Ninety ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults were given either 0.4 mg/kg atracurium or 0.08 mg/kg vecuronium during thiopental-nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 12 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. When spontaneous recovery of first twitch height reached 10% of its initial control value, edrophonium (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 1 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, or 0.05 mg/kg) was administered by random allocation. Neuromuscular function in another ten subjects was allowed to recover spontaneously. Assisted recovery was defined as actual recovery minus mean spontaneous recovery observed in patients who were not given antagonists. First twitch recovery was initially more rapid when vecuronium was antagonized compared with atracurium, but no difference was detected after 10 min. At 10 min the neostigmine ED80 was 0.022 +/- 0.003 (SEM) mg/kg after atracurium and 0.024 +/- 0.003 mg/kg after vecuronium. The edrophonium ED80 was 0.44 +/- 0.11 mg/kg with atracurium and 0.46 +/- 0.12 mg/kg with vecuronium, giving a neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratio of 20. Atracurium train-of-four fade could be antagonized more easily with edrophonium, whereas that of vecuronium was more easily antagonized by neostigmine. It is concluded that edrophonium and neostigmine are not equally effective against atracurium and vecuronium.     

DETERMINANTS OF THE REVERSAL TIME OF COMPETITIVE NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK BY ANTICHOLINESTERASES

We have assessed, in 200 patients, the determinants of the reversaltime of competitive neuromuscular block by anticholinesterasewhen alcuronium and atracurium neuromuscular block were antagonizedby neostigmine 0.04 and 0.08 mg kg^–1 and edrophonium 0.5and 1.0 mg kg^–1. A biexponential relationship was foundbetween the reversal time (time from injection of anticholinesteraseto a train-of-four ratio of 70%) and the degree of neuromuscularblock at reversal (all groups; F ratio, P < 0.05). Reversaltime was determined by two processes: direct antagonism by theanticholinesterase and spontaneous recovery of the neuromuscularblocking agent, with the latter becoming the major determinantat profound levels of neuromuscular block (0–10% of controltwitch height). Neostigmine, in the doses studied, appearedto have a higher "ceiling" of neuromuscular block which it completelyantagonized, although edrophonium had a more rapid onset ofaction. The reversal time for alcuronium became progressivelylonger relative to atracurium as neuromuscular block increasedbecause of the slower spontaneous recovery rate. Avoidance ofprofound neuromuscular block at the completion of surgery isrequired to ensure reliable antagonism of the block within 5–10min by an anticholinesterase. Neostigmine 0.08 mg kg^–1was found to be the most effective agent in antagonizing profoundneuromuscular block.     

Edrophonium Increases Mivacurium Concentrations during Constant Mivacurium Infusion, and Large Doses Minimally Antagonize Paralysis

Background: Mivacurium, a nondepolarizing muscle relaxant, is metabolized by plasma cholinesterase. Although edrophonium does not alter plasma cholinesterase activity, we have observed that doses of edrophonium that antagonize paralysis from other nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are less effective with mivacurium. We speculated that edrophonium might alter metabolism of mivacurium, thereby hindering antagonism of paralysis. Accordingly, we determined the effect of edrophonium on neuromuscular function and plasma mivacurium concentrations during constant mivacurium infusion.

Methods: We infused mivacurium to maintain 90% depression of adductor pollicis twitch tension and then gave edrophonium in doses ranging from 125-2,000 micro gram/kg without altering the mivacurium infusion. Peak twitch tension after edrophonium was determined to estimate the dose of edrophonium antagonizing 50% of twitch depression for antagonism of mivacurium; plasma cholinesterase activity and mivacurium concentrations before and after edrophonium were measured. Additional subjects were given 500 micro gram/kg edrophonium to antagonize continuous infusions of d-tubocurarine and vecuronium.

Results: With mivacurium, edrophonium increased twitch tension in a dose-dependent manner: the dose of edrophonium antagonizing 50% of twitch depression was 2,810 micro gram/kg. The largest dose of edrophonium (2,000 micro gram/kg) produced only 45 plus/minus 7% antagonism. Edrophonium, 500 micro gram/kg, antagonized mivacurium markedly less than it antagonized d-tubocurarine and vecuronium. Edrophonium increased plasma concentrations of the two potent stereoisomers of mivacurium 48% and 79%, these peaking at 1-2 min; plasma cholinesterase activity was unchanged.     

Experimental pharmacology of atracurium dibesylate

Atracurium dibesylate is a new non depolarizing muscle relaxant, metabolized by a non enzymic pathway, the Hofmann elimination. The potency of atracurium in animals was similar to d-tubocurarine and six times less than that of pancuronium. In the cat, the ED50 was 130 micrograms . kg-1; an intravenous dose of 250 micrograms . kg-1 atracurium was sufficient to cause complete neuromuscular block; its duration was 29 min. Single twitch block was readily antagonized by neostigmine 50-100 micrograms . kg-1 or edrophonium 200 micrograms . kg-1. Halothane potentiated the block given by atracurium. Dose ratio for 50% vagal block (ED50) and 50% neuromuscular block was 24; atracurium had weak ganglioplegic effects. 2,000 micrograms . kg-1 atracurium (eight times the neuromuscular blocking dose) reduced mean aortic pressure, heart rate, cardiac output and peripheral resistance. Such effects could be prevented by giving histamine receptor blockers prior to injecting atracurium.     

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recovery times following edrophonium and neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, atracurium, and vecuronium steady-state infusions

The ability of edrophonium and neostigmine to antagonize nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade produced by steady-state infusions of atracurium, pancuronium, and vecuronium was studied in 71 adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide and halothane. Infusion rates of blocking drugs were adjusted so that single twitch depression as measured by the evoked integrated EMG of the hypothenar muscles was kept at 10% of control. Two minutes after the termination of the infusion either edrophonium (0.75 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered. Single twitch depression and train-of-four (T4/T1) fade was recorded during the recovery period. T4/T1 fade ratios observed at 20 min postreversal were 0.80 (atracurium-edrophonium); 0.76 (vecuronium-edrophonium); 0.44 (pancuronium-edrophonium); 0.95 (atracurium-neostigmine); 0.89 (vecuronium-neostigmine); and 0.68 (pancuronium-neostigmine). Under conditions of this study neostigmine produced more rapid and complete recovery than did edrophonium. Although edrophonium produced adequate antagonism of atracurium if 20-30 min were allowed to elapse, edrophonium reversal of pancuronium was rarely acceptable even at 30 min. Increasing the dose of edrophonium to 1.0 mg/kg produced single twitch values of 0.90 at 5 min postreversal but did not increase the rate of recovery of the train-of-four fade ratio. Neostigmine reversal of pancuronium, on the other hand, generally produced T4/T1 ratios of greater than 0.70 in 20-30 min. Although the pattern of recovery seen after reversal of vecuronium was in general quite similar to that seen after atracurium, two patients in the vecuronium-edrophonium group showed delayed recovery and also failed to respond significantly to subsequent doses of neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Factors predicting atracurium reversal time

BACKGROUND: To identify individual factors and combination of factors predictive of reversal time (defined as time from neostigmine administration to train-of-four (TOF) ratio 0.70) from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, the present study tested the following variables as possible predictors of reversal time: 1) degree of block at the time of antagonism as quantified by first response to TOF or double-burst stimulation (DBS); 2) time from last supplemental dose of atracurium to administration of neostigmine (pre-reversal time); and 3) time from administration of initial atracurium dose to T1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in TOF) recovered to 10% (duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium). METHODS: The study population comprised 83 female patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2, anaesthetized with fentanyl, thiopental, halothane and nitrous oxide. Initial and supplemental doses of atracurium were 0.5 mg x kg(-1) and 0.15 mg x kg(-1), respectively. Evoked responses to TOF or DBS were recorded mechanomyographically. Neuromuscular block was antagonized with neostigmine, 0.07 mg x kg(-1), at varying time intervals (6-50 min) after the final atracurium dose. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses testing T1, D1 (the magnitude of the first twitch in DBS), pre-reversal time and duration of action of the initial dose of atracurium, demonstrated that with superficial block, T1 >15%, T1 is the only significant predictor for reversal time. With moderate block, 0< T1 < or =15%, both T1 and duration of action of the initial atracurium dose are significant predictors for reversal time. With profound block, T1=0, duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time are significant predictors for reversal time. CONCLUSION: 1) T1 is a more important predictor for reversal time from atracurium-induced neuromuscular block than D1; 2) predictors differ with the degree of block: with T1 > 15%, T1 is the only significant predictor; with 0< T1 < or =15%, the duration of action of the initial dose and T1 are predictors for reversal time; with T1=0, the duration of action of the initial dose and pre-reversal time predict reversal time.     

Antagonism of pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks by edrophonium or neostigmine: a comparative study

Edrophonium 0.5 and neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 were compared as antagonists of pancuronium and tubocurarine-induced neuromuscular blocks, at varying degrees of recovery, in groups of 20 patients each. Adequate antagonism was defined as attaining a sustained train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.7 or more. Administration of edrophonium was associated with a more rapid onset of action (17 s with both relaxants with edrophonium, and 31 s and 29 s with neostigmine with pancuronium and tubocurarine, respectively), and a shorter time to attain a TOF ratio of 0.7 (74 s and 48 s with edrophonium and 230 s and 293 s with neostigmine for pancuronium and tubocurarine blocks, respectively). However, whereas neostigmine administration provided adequate antagonism in all 20 patients given pancuronium and in 19 out of 20 patients given tubocurarine, edrophonium failed to achieve adequate antagonism in six patients after pancuronium and eight patients after tubocurarine. The majority of these patients had shown three or less responses to a TOF stimulation prior to antagonism. Two separate groups of 10 patients each with relatively deeper pancuronium or tubocurarine blocks (three or less responses to TOF stimulation) were given edrophonium in a dose of 1.0 mg kg-1. However, adequate antagonism even with this dose of edrophonium was attained in only two out of 10 patients given pancuronium and in five out of 10 patients given tubocurarine. It is concluded that edrophonium is unreliable for antagonism of relatively deep blocks by pancuronium or tubocurarine and that neostigmine is the preferred and more reliable antagonist.     

Neuromuscular monitoring by intensive care nurses: comparison of acceleromyography and tactile assessment

We have compared tactile assessment of the train-of-four (TOF) count and TOF ratio by nursing staff, with measurements made by a new acceleromyographic monitor, the TOF-Watch. We assessed neuromuscular block in 30 sedated intensive care patients receiving a continuous infusion of atracurium. Five nurses made a tactile assessment of neuromuscular block in each patient within a 5-min period. Each assessment was paired with a blinded TOF-Watch measurement. The nurses were accurate in assessing twitch count in 55% of measurements and they tended to overestimate the degree of block using tactile assessment of TOF ratio.      

Edrophonium priming for antagonism of atracurium neuro-muscular blockade

Edrophonium administered in divided doses has been reported to accelerate antagonism of neuromuscular blockade, i.e., a "priming" effect. Since measured onset times can be affected by the type of stimulation used, this effect was studied using both train-of-four (TOF) and single twitch (ST) stimulation. During thiopentone-nitrous oxide-enflurane anaesthesia 20 adults were given atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1. Both ulnar nerves were stimulated with TOF every 12 sec until one per cent recovery of first twitch (T1). At this time, ST stimulation was applied to one arm, selected at random. When the mean value of T1 and ST reached ten per cent of control, edrophonium, 1 mg.kg-1, preceded by atropine was given either as a single dose, or in two doses consisting of 0.2 mg.kg-1 followed by 0.8 mg.kg-1 three minutes later. No statistically significant differences were observed between T1 and ST for the next ten minutes, whether edrophonium had been given in single or divided doses. Giving edrophonium in divided doses did not improve recovery significantly, measured with either T1, ST or train-of-four ratio (T4/T1). Five minutes after the first administration of edrophonium, T1 was (mean +/- SEM) 86 +/- 3 and 86 +/- 2 per cent control in the single and divided dose groups respectively. Corresponding values for ST were 89 +/- 1 and 89 +/- 2 per cent (NS), and for TOF, 49 +/- 3 and 57 +/- 3 per cent (NS), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium

To compare the time course of neostigmine and edrophonium antagonism of varying intensity neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, pancuronium, or vecuronium, the authors studied 98 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide (60%) and halothane or enflurane. Neuromuscular blockade, as monitored by single stimulus-induced twitch tension (TT), was antagonized at varying degrees of spontaneous recovery (2-80% of control TT). Time to antagonism (time from injection of neostigmine or edrophonium to 90% recovery of control TT) was not different between edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, when spontaneous recovery had been allowed to occur to at least 11% of control TT prior to antagonist administration (P greater than 0.05). For profound neuromuscular blockade (TT less than or equal to 10% of control) induced by pancuronium or vecuronium, time (mean +/- SD) to antagonism with neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, was 7.0 +/- 2.2 min and 5.6 +/- 1.7 min, respectively, while the same for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, was 20.0 +/- 8.0 min and 15.0 +/- 12.5 min, respectively (P less than 0.05). Time to antagonism of profound atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was 8.5 +/- 3.3 min for neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, and 9.8 +/- 7.0 min for edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, (P less than 0.05). For profound vecuronium-and pancuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade, time to antagonism by edrophonium, 1.0 mg/kg, was 4.6 +/- 3.0 min and 3.9 +/- 1.6 min respectively. The authors conclude that neostigmine, 0.04 mg/kg, antagonizes neuromuscular blockade within 12 min when TT is greater than 2% of control at time of reversal. When TT is greater than 10% of control, edrophonium, 0.5 mg/kg, produces similar time to antagonism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Reversal of intense neuromuscular blockade following infusion of atracurium

In order to evaluate reversal time from very intense neuromuscular blockade caused by a continuous infusion of atracurium, the time course of neostigmine induced reversal from different levels of neuromuscular blockade was evaluated using the post-tetanic count (PTC) and the train-of-four (TOF) in 30 patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide, fentanyl, and thiopental. Reversal time (time from administration of neostigmine at different PTC levels to a TOF ratio of 0.7) was found to depend upon the degree of blockade at the time of reversal. Median reversal time from a PTC of 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12, and greater than 13 (but less than 10% twitch height) to a TOF ratio of 0.7 was 31, 23, 19, 18, 14, and 13 min, respectively. Spontaneous recovery from PTC level of 1-2, when atracurium infusion was stopped, to a PTC level at which antagonism was induced and reversal time were both correlated to the square root of the PTC. Total recovery time (spontaneous recovery plus reversal time) was not shortened by an early injection of neostigmine. It is concluded that neostigmine administration during intense neuromuscular blockade following atracurium infusion does not shorten total recovery time and offers no clinical advantages.     

The neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring

The neuromuscular transmission module (M-NMT) is an integrated piezoelectric motion sensor module incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia monitor. We compared the neuromuscular block of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (twice the 95% effective dose) monitored by the M-NMT with that monitored by the Relaxometer mechanomyograph (MMG). The two monitors were alternately allocated to the left or right hands of 20 patients. T(1)%, the first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF), and the TOF ratio (T(4)/T(1)) were used for evaluating the neuromuscular block. There was no significant difference in the mean (min) plus minus SD onset time or time to 0.8 TOF ratio recovery measured by the M-NMT (1.5 plus/minus 0.3, 49.4 plus/minus 8.1) compared with MMG (1.8 plus/minus 0.6, 50.9 plus/minus 9.9), respectively. However, the time (min) to 25% T(1) recovery was significantly longer when monitored by the M-NMT (25.6 plus/minus 8) than by the MMG (20.2 plus/minus 6.3). During recovery from neuromuscular block, the difference between the TOF ratios measured by the two monitors showed a bias of -0.031, and the limits of agreement (bias plus/minus 1.96 SD) were -0.281 and +0.22. The M-NMT monitor could determine the time to tracheal intubation as well as full recovery from neuromuscular block, but it lagged behind the MMG in determining the time to rocuronium repeat dose administration. IMPLICATIONS:Compared with the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, the neuromuscular transmission module could equally indicate time to tracheal intubation and full recovery from 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium neuromuscular block. Its small quick-fit sensor has the advantage, in an often crowded and busy operating room, of being incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia workstation.     

Edrophonium effectively antagonizes neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors induced by rapacuronium, rocuronium and cisatracurium, but not mivacurium

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of antagonism of rapacuronium-, mivacurium-, rocuronium- and cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block at the laryngeal adductors (LA). METHODS: One hundred four patients were randomly assigned to one of eight study groups. They either received rapacuronium 1.5 mg x kg(-1), mivacurium 0.25 mg x kg(-1), rocuronium 0.9 mg x kg(-1) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg x kg(-1). Patients in each treatment group either received edrophonium (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) at 10% recovery of the first twitch (T1) of train-of-four (TOF) at the LA or were allowed to recover spontaneously from neuromuscular block. The effect of antagonism on speed of recovery of neuromuscular function at the LA was evaluated. RESULTS: The time to recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 at the LA, when compared to the spontaneous recovery group, was significantly shortened by the administration of edrophonium in patients receiving rapacuronium [19.2 +/- 7.8 vs 26.2 +/- 4.9 (mean +/- SD) min], rocuronium (24.7 +/- 14.3 vs 44.4 +/- 13.0 min) and cisatracurium (24.2 +/- 5.7 vs 35.1 +/- 7.6 min). Edrophonium administration did not shorten complete recovery from mivacurium-induced block (15.7 +/- 8.0 vs 17.6 +/- 6.1 min). CONCLUSION: Recovery from rapacuronium-, rocuronium- or cisatracurium- induced neuromuscular block to a TOF ratio of 0.9 as measured at the LA was shortened by the administration of edrophonium, when compared to spontaneous recovery.