Good clinical activity and favorable toxicity profile of once weekly bortezomib,fotemustine, and dexamethasone (B‐MuD) for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma

Since multiple myeloma (MM) is still not‐curable, the management of relapse remains challenging. Given the known efficacy of alkylating agents in MM, we conducted a phase I/II study to test a new three drug combination in which Fotemustine (Muphoran), an alkylating agent of nitrosurea family, was added to bortezomib + dexamethasone backbone (B‐MuD) for the treatment of MM relapsed patients. Fotemustine was administered at two dose levels (80–100 mg/m² i.v.) on day 1. The original 21‐day schedule was early amended for extra‐hematological toxicity and a 35‐day schedule was adopted (Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, Dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) for a total of six courses. Twenty‐four patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose of Fotemustine was 100 mg/m². The overall response rate was of 62% (CR 8%, VGPR 33%, and PR 21%). The median OS was 28.5 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 19.1 months. B‐MuD resulted effective in patients previous exposed to bortezomib without difference of response (P = 0.25) and PFS (P = 0.87) when compared to bortezomib‐naive patients. Thrombocytopenia was the most common AE overall. In conclusion, B‐MuD is an effective and well tolerated combination in relapsed MM patients even in advanced disease phase. © Am. J. Hematol., 88:102–106, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Combination therapy with bortezomib,continuous low‐dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by one year of maintenance treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma patients

Combination therapy for longer periods but at low dose might be an effective and tolerable manner to treat patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We used bortezomib, dexamethasone and low‐dose oral cyclophosphamide as an induction regimen, followed by 1 year of maintenance consisting of bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. Relapsed MM patients were treated with six cycles of bortezomib twice weekly, cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily and dexamethasone. Maintenance therapy was given for 1 year. Primary endpoints were toxicity during re‐induction and maintenance therapy. Secondary endpoints were response to treatment and progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study included 59 patients. Myelosuppression and neuropathy were the most common side effects. Median follow‐up was 27·1 (0·46–54·4) months with an overall response of 71%, and a very good partial response or more of 33%. During maintenance, improved responsiveness was observed in 19% of the patients. The median PFS was 18·4 months (range 0·13–43·5) and the median OS was 28·1 months (range 0·13–54·4). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that treatment with bortezomib, dexamethasone and low‐dose cyclophosphamide is an effective and manageable regimen. Adding 1 year of maintenance was feasible, with limited side effects and an increased response rate.     

The use of novel Therakos™ Cellex® for extracorporeal photopheresis in treatment of graft‐versus‐host disease in paediatric patients

Interleukin‐6 (IL6) plays a central role in multiple myeloma pathogenesis and confers resistance to corticosteroid‐induced apoptosis. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of siltuximab, an anti‐IL6 monoclonal antibody, alone and in combination with dexamethasone, for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had ≥2 prior lines of therapy, one of which had to be bortezomib‐based. Fourteen initial patients received siltuximab alone, 10 of whom had dexamethasone added for suboptimal response; 39 subsequent patients were treated with concurrent siltuximab and dexamethasone. Patients received a median of four prior lines of therapy, 83% were relapsed and refractory, and 70% refractory to their last dexamethasone‐containing regimen. Suppression of serum C‐reactive protein levels, a surrogate marker of IL6 inhibition, was demonstrated. There were no responses to siltuximab but combination therapy yielded a partial (17%) + minimal (6%) response rate of 23%, with responses seen in dexamethasone‐refractory disease. The median time to progression, progression‐free survival and overall survival for combination therapy was 4·4, 3·7 and 20·4 months respectively. Haematological toxicity was common but manageable. Infections occurred in 57% of combination‐treated patients, including ≥grade 3 infections in 18%. Further study of siltuximab in modern corticosteroid‐containing myeloma regimens is warranted, with special attention to infection‐related toxicity.     

A phase 2 study of modified lenalidomide,bortezomib and dexamethasone in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma

We sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents and balances efficacy with toxicity in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study evaluated modified lenalidomide‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population and was administered over a 35‐day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally on days 1–21; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² weekly subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally was given on the day of and day after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation with lenalidomide and bortezomib. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty‐three eligible patients were screened between April 2013 and May 2015; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 73 years (range 65–91). The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response or better. Median PFS was 35·1 months (95% confidence interval 30·9–not reached) and median OS was not reached at a median follow‐up of 30 months. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. RVD lite is a well‐tolerated and highly effective regimen, with robust PFS and OS, in the transplant‐ineligible MM population.     

Clinical efficacy of a bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Vel-CTD) regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase II study

The clinical efficacy and safety of a four-drug combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was assessed for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Seventy patients received at least two cycles of treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m² orally on days 1–4; thalidomide 50 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. The overall best response rate was 88%, with 46% complete response, 9% very good partial response, and 33% partial response. After a median follow-up of 12.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months with a 3-year PFS of 14% and the median overall survival (OS) was 31.6 months with a 3-year OS of 47%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (4%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (3%), with thrombosis being very rare (<1%). Bortezomib combined with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective salvage therapy with manageable toxicity for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.     

Overall survival of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients after adjusting for crossover in the MM‐003 trial for pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone

In the phase III MM‐003 trial, pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) improved overall survival (OS) versus high‐dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in 455 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide. Here, a two‐stage Weibull method was used to adjust for the crossover of patients in the HiDEX arm to pomalidomide‐based therapy. The adjusted difference in median OS between patients in the POM+LoDEX and HiDEX arms was 7·0 months (12·7 vs. 5·7 months, respectively). These findings provide important evidence for understanding the clinical efficacy of pomalidomide on OS benefits seen in RRMM patients.     

The relationship between quality of response and clinical benefit for patients treated on the bortezomib arm of the international, randomized, phase 3 APEX trial in relapsed multiple myeloma

Quality of response is associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. This cohort study within the phase 3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) trial of bortezomib versus dexamethasone in relapsed myeloma assessed the relationship between quality of response to bortezomib (n = 315) and clinical benefit. Treatment-free interval (TFI), time to alternative therapy (TTAT), time to progression (TTP) and OS were assessed in response-evaluable patients in the bortezomib arm in cohorts defined by achievement of complete response (CR; n = 27), very good partial response (VGPR; n = 31), partial response (PR; n = 77), minimal response (MR; n = 21) or non-response (NR, including stable and progressive disease; n = 159). CR was associated with significantly longer median TFI (24.1 vs. 6.9/6.4 months) and TTAT (27.1 vs. 13.6/14 months) versus VGPR/PR. Median TTP was similar in CR, VGPR and PR cohorts; median OS was not reached. Patients achieving MR appeared to have prolonged median TFI (3.8 vs. 2.3 months), TTAT (8.7 vs. 6.2 months), TTP (4.9 vs. 2.8 months) and OS (24.9 vs. 18.7 months) versus NR. In conclusion, bortezomib had substantial activity in relapsed myeloma patients; CR may be a surrogate marker for significant clinical benefit with bortezomib. MR appeared to be valid as a separate response category in this setting.     

Thalidomide and dexamethasone vs. bortezomib and dexamethasone for melphalan refractory myeloma: a randomized study

Objectives: Thalidomide and bortezomib have been frequently used for second‐line therapy in patients with myeloma relapsing after or refractory to initial melphalan‐based treatment, but no randomized trials have been published comparing these two treatment alternatives. Methods: Thalidomide‐ and bortezomib‐naïve patients with melphalan refractory myeloma were randomly assigned to low‐dose thalidomide + dexamethasone (Thal‐Dex) or bortezomib + dexamethasone (Bort‐Dex). At progression on either therapy, the patients were offered crossover to the alternative drug combination. An estimated 300 patients would be needed for the trial to detect a 50% difference in median PFS between the treatment arms. Results: After inclusion of 131 patients, the trial was prematurely closed because of low accrual. Sixty‐seven patients were randomized to Thal‐Dex and 64 to Bort‐Dex. Progression‐free survival was similar (median, 9.0 months for Thal‐Dex and 7.2 for Bort‐Dex). Response rate was similar (55% for Thal‐Dex and 63% for Bort‐Dex), but time to response was shorter (P < 0.05) and the VGPR rate higher (P < 0.01) for Bort‐Dex. Time‐to‐other treatment after crossover was similar (median, 13.2 months for Thal‐Dex and 11.2 months for Bort‐Dex), as was overall survival (22.8 months for Thal‐Dex and 19.0 for Bort‐Dex). Venous thromboembolism was seen in seven patients and cerebrovascular events in four patients in the Thal‐Dex group. Severe neuropathy, reactivation of herpes virus infections, and mental depression were more frequently observed in the Bort‐Dex group. In the quality‐of‐life analysis, no difference was noted for physical function, pain, and global quality of life. Fatigue and sleep disturbances were significantly more prevalent in the Bort‐Dex group. Conclusions: Thalidomide (50–100 mg daily) in combination with dexamethasone seems to have an efficacy comparable with that of bortezomib and dexamethasone in melphalan refractory myeloma. However, the statistical strength of the results in this study is limited by the low number of included patients.     

Phase II trial of R‐CHOP plus bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: SWOG S0601

Bortezomib is active in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with approval in upfront and relapsed settings. Given inevitable recurrence following induction chemoimmunotherapy, maintenance approaches are a rational strategy to improve clinical outcomes. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of six cycles of R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) plus bortezomib (1·3 mg/m² days 1 and 4 of 21 d cycles) followed by bortezomib maintenance (1·3 mg/m² days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 months for 2 years). Sixty‐five eligible patients were enrolled. The treatment was well tolerated and toxicities were mainly haematological. The rate of grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy was low (5%). With a median follow‐up of 6·8 years, 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) was 62%, and 2‐year overall survival (OS) was 85%. At 5 years, PFS was 28% and OS was 66%. MCL International Prognostic Index scores were significantly associated with 2‐year PFS, but did not predict long‐term (≥5‐year) PFS. Baseline Ki‐67 index was significantly associated with survival. Combination R‐CHOP with bortezomib followed by maintenance bortezomib appears to improve outcomes compared historically with R‐CHOP alone, with prolonged remissions in a subset of patients. These results suggest that inclusion of bortezomib with induction chemotherapy and/or maintenance is promising in MCL and warrants further exploration.     

Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisone in the phase III VISTA study

This analysis, using data from the bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisone (VMP) arm of the Phase III VISTA study, investigated whether increased cumulative bortezomib dose could improve overall survival (OS) in transplant‐ineligible patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Median cumulative bortezomib dose received by the 340 patients was 39 mg/m²; this was selected as the cut‐off for defining the dose groups to be compared for OS. Patient characteristics were well balanced between dose groups except for age. OS was significantly longer in the higher (≥39 mg/m²) versus lower (<39 mg/m²) cumulative bortezomib dose group (median 66.3 vs. 46.2 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.533, P < 0.0001; age‐adjusted HR 0.561, P = 0.0002). To overcome confounding effects of early discontinuations/deaths, which were more common in the lower cumulative dose group (27 vs. 4% of patients discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in the lower and higher cumulative dose groups, respectively), a landmark analysis was conducted at 180 days, eliminating patients who died or discontinued before this time from the analysis. OS from this landmark remained significantly longer in the higher dose group (median 60.4 vs. 50.3 months; HR 0.709, P = 0.0372). Thus, higher cumulative bortezomib dose, reflecting prolonged treatment duration and/or dose intensity, appears associated with improved OS. Approaches to achieve higher cumulative doses could include subcutaneous bortezomib administration, dose/schedule modifications, continuing therapy in responding patients, and proactive AE management. Am. J. Hematol. 90:314–319, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Characterisation of haematological profiles and low risk of thromboembolic events with bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

Haematological toxicities and thromboembolic (TE) events are common complications of myeloma therapy. TE risk may be elevated with combination regimens, notably thalidomide/lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone; concomitant erythropoietin appears to further increase the risk with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. We characterised thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in the phase 3 APEX (Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions) study of bortezomib versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed myeloma, and calculated the incidences of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE) with: bortezomib or dexamethasone +/- erythropoietin in APEX; bortezomib +/- dexamethasone +/- erythropoietin in two phase 2 studies of relapsed/refractory myeloma. Bortezomib-associated thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were transient, predictable and manageable; mean platelet and neutrophil counts followed a cyclical pattern, and improved over the treatment course. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia incidence was higher with bortezomib versus dexamethasone (26%/4% vs. 5%/1%), but significant bleeding events were comparable (4% vs. 5%). DVT/PE incidence was low (< or =3.1%) in all analyses; addition of dexamethasone/erythropoietin did not affect TE risk. In APEX, TE risk appeared lower with bortezomib versus dexamethasone. Bortezomib caused transient and cyclical thrombocytopenia and was not associated with elevated TE risk, alone or with dexamethasone +/- erythropoietin. Preliminary data suggest bortezomib may reduce the thrombogenic potential of combination regimens via inhibition of platelet function or other mechanism-specific effects on coagulation.     

Bortezomib,melphalan, prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan,prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective case‐matched study

Novel agents in combination with melphalan and prednisone (MP) significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). Randomized trials comparing MP plus bortezomib (VMP) versus MP plus thalidomide (MPT) are lacking. Nine hundred and fifty‐six elderly (>65 years) newly diagnosed MM patients from six European randomized trials were retrospectively analyzed and matched for age, albumin, and beta2‐microglobulin at diagnosis, 296 patients were selected from the VMP groups, and 294 from MPT. Complete response rate was 21% in the VMP patients and 13% in the MPT patients (P = 0.007). After a median follow‐up of 34 months (range, 1–92), VMP significantly prolonged both PFS (median 32.5 vs. 22.9 months, HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.82; P < 0.001) and OS (median 79.7 vs. 45.1 months, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.32–0.59; P < 0.001) in comparison with MPT. The benefit in terms of OS of the VMP group was quite similar among patients with different risk factors defined by sex, ISS, ECOG performance status, or serum creatinine but not among patients ≥75 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that VMP was an independent predictor of longer PFS and OS. In a control‐case matched analysis, PFS and OS were prolonged in patients who received VMP in comparison with those treated with MPT. Am. J. Hematol. 89:355–362, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Absolute lymphocyte count at the time of first relapse predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is a survival prognostic factor in hematological malignancies. No reports have addressed whether ALC at the time of first relapse (ALC‐R) predicts survival. Thus, we assessed the prognostic significance of ALC‐R in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients were required to have been diagnosed with first relapsed DLBCL, have ALC‐R values, and to be followed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. From Feb 1987 until March 2006, 97 first relapsed DLBCL patients qualified for the study. The overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were measured from the time of first relapse. The value of ALC‐R ≥ 1.0 × 10⁹/L was used for the analysis. Both groups (ALC‐R ≥ 1 or < 1 × 10⁹/L) were balanced for the international prognostic index at relapse (IPI‐R) (P = 0.3), and for autologous stem cell transplantation (P = 0.4). Superior OS and PFS were observed with an ALC‐R ≥ 1.0 × 10⁹/L (N = 60) versus ALC‐R < 1.0 × 10⁹/L (N = 37) [median OS: 28.7 months, 5 years OS rates of 39% versus median OS: 10.2 months, 5 years OS rates of 14%, P < 0.002; and median PFS: 14.8 months, 5 years PFS rates of 21% versus median PFS: 6.5 months, 5 years PFS rates of 8%, P < 0.004, respectively]. ALC‐R was an independent prognostic factor for OS [RR = 0.4, P < 0.01] and PFS [RR = 0.5, P < 0.005]. ALC‐R predicts survival suggesting that host immunity is an important variable predicting survival in first relapsed DLBCL. Am. J. Hematol. 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Phase II study of bortezomib,cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma: DSMM XI trial

We assessed the safety and efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. A total of 414 patients received three 21‐day cycles of VCD prior to autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were leucopenia (31·4%) and thrombocytopenia (6·8%). The overall response rate (ORR) by investigator‐based assessment was 85·4%. Most patients (74%) underwent successful central laboratory‐based molecular cytogenetic analysis. No clinically relevant differences in ORR post‐induction were seen between patients with or without high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities (86·2% vs. 84·3%). Further follow‐up data are available for 113 patients receiving ASCT who were included in a prospective consolidation trial (median follow‐up, 55·5 months); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 35·3 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In patients with high‐risk versus standard‐risk cytogenetics, median PFS was 19·9 vs. 43·6 months (P < 0·0001), and median OS was 54·7 months versus not reached (P = 0·0022). VCD is an effective and tolerable induction regimen; results suggest that VCD induces high response rates independently of cytogenetic risk status, but after long‐term follow‐up, cytogenetic high risk is associated with markedly reduced PFS and OS post‐ASCT.     

Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

Adverse prognostic factors in multiple myeloma include advanced age, number of prior therapies, and higher International Staging System (ISS) disease stage. In the international, randomised, phase-3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) study, bortezomib demonstrated significantly longer time to progression (TTP), higher response rates and improved survival compared with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma following one to three prior therapies. In this APEX subgroup analysis, efficacy of bortezomib and dexamethasone was compared in elderly (age > or =65 years) and high-risk (>1 prior line of therapy; ISS stage II/III; refractory to prior therapy) patients. Bortezomib demonstrated substantial clinical activity in these patients. Response rate (34-40% vs. 13-19%), including complete response rate (5-8% vs. 0-1%), was significantly higher with bortezomib versus dexamethasone in all four subgroups. Similarly, median TTP was significantly longer with bortezomib versus dexamethasone, and 1-year survival probability was significantly higher in all subgroups. As in the total APEX population, rates of grade 3/4 adverse events were higher in bortezomib- versus dexamethasone-treated patients aged > or =65 years and with >1 prior line, while rates of serious adverse events were similar; toxicities generally proved manageable. Bortezomib should be considered an appropriate treatment for elderly and high-risk patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.     

Addition of bortezomib to standard dose chop chemotherapy improves response and survival in relapsed mantle cell lymphoma

The proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, potentially increases cell sensitivity to chemotherapy. This study was performed to determine the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and toxicity of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) compared to CHOP + bortezomib chemotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients at first relapse. Forty‐six patients were randomly assigned to standard dose CHOP ± bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² given on a 21‐d cycle for up to eight cycles of treatment. Median age was 71 years (CHOP arm) and 69 years (CHOP‐bortezomib arm). Median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (CHOP) and 0 (CHOP‐bortezomib) with 65% and 52%, respectively, having a disease stage of IV. ORR was 47·8% (CHOP) and 82·6% (CHOP‐bortezomib). Complete response rate was 21·7% (CHOP) vs. 34·8% (CHOP‐bortezomib); partial response rate was 26·1% (CHOP) vs. 47·8% (CHOP‐bortezomib). Median OS was 11·8 months (CHOP) and 35·6 months (CHOP‐bortezomib) (P = 0·01, Hazard ratio [HR] 0·37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·16–0·83)] and there was a non‐significant improvement in PFS: 8·1 months (CHOP) and 16·5 months (CHOP‐bortezomib) [P = 0·12, HR 0·60 (95% CI 0·31–1·15)]. Severe (≥grade 3) sensory neuropathy was similar in both arms (4·3% CHOP vs. 6·5% CHOP‐bortezomib). We conclude that the addition of bortezomib to CHOP chemotherapy for relapsed MCL significantly improves outcome with a manageable increase in toxicity.     

Reduction in C‐reactive protein indicates successful targeting of the IL‐1/IL‐6 axis resulting in improved survival in early stage multiple myeloma

We report the long‐term follow‐up results of a phase II trial of IL‐1 receptor antagonist and low‐dose dexamethasone for early stage multiple myeloma (MM). Patients were eligible if they had smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) or indolent multiple myeloma (IMM) without the need for immediate therapy. Forty seven patients were enrolled and subsequently treated with IL‐1Ra; in 25/47 low‐dose dexamethasone (20 mg weekly) was added. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). In the clinical trial, three patients achieved a minor response (MR) to IL‐1Ra alone; five patients a partial response (PR) and four patients an MR after addition of dexamethasone. Seven patients showed a decrease in the plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) which paralleled a decrease in the high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP). The median PFS for the 47 patients was 1116 days (37.2 months). The median PFS for patients without (n = 22) and with (n = 25) a decrease in their baseline hs‐CRP was 326 days (11 months) vs. 3139 days (104 months) respectively (P <0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) for the 47 patients was 3482 days (9.5 years). The median OS for patients without and with a decrease in their baseline hs‐CRP was 2885 days (7.9 years) vs. median not reached, respectively (P = 0.001). In SMM/IMM patients at risk for progression to active myeloma, reduction in the hs‐CRP indicates successful targeting of the IL‐1/IL‐6 axis resulting in improved PFS and OS. (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00635154) Am. J. Hematol. 91:571–574, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Phase 2 study of two sequential three‐drug combinations containing bortezomib,cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone,followed by bortezomib,thalidomide and dexamethasone as frontline therapy for multiple myeloma

Novel sequential combination therapy for induction may improve the quality of response and therefore prolong survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We report results from a phase 2 study of two sequential three‐drug combinations. Forty‐four previously untreated, symptomatic MM patients received: bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² (days 1, 4, 8, 11), cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² (days 1, 8), plus dexamethasone 40 mg (day of and day after bortezomib) for three 21‐day cycles, followed by bortezomib 1·0 mg/m², dexamethasone 40 mg and thalidomide 100 mg daily for three cycles. Overall response rate for 42 evaluable patients was 95%, including 19% stringent complete response (sCR), 26% CR, and 57%≥ very good partial response. Twenty‐two patients have undergone stem‐cell transplantation. After a median follow‐up of 20·9 months, five patients have died; none was induction therapy‐related. Median event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached; estimated 1‐year EFS and OS rates were 81% and 91% respectively. Both three‐drug combinations were well tolerated; 82% of patients completed all six cycles. Toxicities were predictable and manageable; the most‐commonly reported grade 3/4 toxicity was neuropathy (11%). This novel sequential three‐drug combination therapy is effective and well‐tolerated in previously untreated MM patients.     

The combination of bortezomib with chemotherapy to treat relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia of childhood

Achieving complete remission (CR ) in childhood relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL ) is a difficult task. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has in vitro activity against ALL blasts. A phase I‐II trial, reported by the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukaemia and Lymphoma (TACL ) consortium, demonstrated that bortezomib with chemotherapy has acceptable toxicity and remarkable activity in patients with relapsed ALL failing 2–3 previous regimens. We evaluated bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy in 30 and 7 children with B‐cell precursor (BCP ) and T‐cell ALL , respectively. Bortezomib (1·3 mg/m²/dose) was administered intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Chemotherapy agents were the same as those used in the TACL trial, consisting of dexamethasone, doxorubicin, vincristine and pegylated asparaginase. Three patients (8·1%) died due to infections. Twenty‐seven patients (72·9%) achieved CR or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CR p). Fourteen had minimal residual disease (MRD ) lower than 0·1%. Twenty‐two of 30 BCP ‐ALL patients (73·3%) and 5/7 patients (71%) with T‐cell ALL achieved CR /CR p. The 2‐year overall survival (OS ) is 31·3%; CR /CR p patients with an MRD response had a remarkable 2‐year OS of 68·4%. These data confirm that the combination of bortezomib with chemotherapy is a suitable/effective option for childhood relapsed/refractory ALL .     

A prospective,international phase 2 study of bortezomib retreatment in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) typically follows a relapsing course with many patients requiring multiple therapies. This single‐arm phase 2 study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib retreatment in MM patients who had relapsed after achieving at least a partial response (≥PR) to prior bortezomib‐based therapy. Patients aged ≥18 years, with measurable, secretory MM, who relapsed ≥6 months after prior bortezomib treatment were eligible. Patients received up to eight cycles of bortezomib (±dexamethasone). The primary endpoint was best confirmed response at retreatment; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), and safety. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. A total of 130 patients (median of two prior lines of therapy) were enrolled and received retreatment. At retreatment, 28% and 72% of patients received bortezomib and bortezomib‐dexamethasone, respectively. Overall response rate was 40%. In patients who achieved ≥PR, median DOR and TTP were 6·5 and 8·4 months, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was the most common grade ≥3 AE (35%). Forty percent of patients experienced neuropathy events, which improved and resolved in a median of 1·5 and 8·9 months, respectively. In conclusion, bortezomib retreatment was effective and tolerable in relapsed MM patients, with no evidence of cumulative toxicities.