Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrasonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrasonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrasonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.     

RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENT BILE DUCT STONES AFTER ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION: LONG‐TERM FOLLOW‐UP STUDY

Background: Little is known about the long‐term results of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for bile duct stones. Methods: Between 1995 and 2000, 204 patients with bile duct stones successfully underwent EPBD and stone removal. Complete stone clearance was confirmed using balloon cholangiography and intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS). Long‐term outcomes of EPBD were investigated retrospectively in the year 2007, and risk factors for stone recurrence were multivariately analyzed. Results: Long‐term information was available in 182 cases (89.2%), with a mean overall follow‐up duration of 9.3 years. Late biliary complications occurred in 22 patients (12.1%), stone recurrence in 13 (7.1%), cholangitis in 10 (5.5%), cholecystitis in four, and gallstone pancreatitis in one. In 11 of 13 patients (84.6%), stone recurrence developed within 3 years after EPBD. All recurrent stones were bilirubinate. Multivariate analysis identified three risk factors for stone recurrence: dilated bile duct (>15 mm), previous cholecystectomy, and no confirmation of clean duct using IDUS. Conclusion: Approximately 7% of patients develop stone recurrence after EPBD; however, retreatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is effective. Careful follow up is necessary in patients with dilated bile duct or previous cholecystectomy. IDUS is useful for reducing stone recurrence after EPBD.     

Preservation of papillary relaxation after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation has been accepted as a less hazardous alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with impaired hemostasis. Several manometric studies have suggested that endoscopic papillary balloon dilation can be expected to preserve papillary function. However, the aspect of the preservation of postprandial relaxation has not been addressed. METHODOLOGY: Seven, 7 and 6 patients underwent fatty-meal magnetic resonance cholangiography before endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of common bile duct stones, and then 12 and 24 months after the procedure. Seven patients were employed as controls. Magnetic resonance cholangiography images were obtained on a 1.5-Tesla scanner (Signa Horizon, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) with a phased-array torso coil. After an overnight fast, magnetic resonance cholangiography was performed before and after fatty-meal ingestion. RESULTS: No patients showed significant postprandial increase of the bile duct diameter except one patient with stone impaction during the examination. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation may preserve the papillary function of postprandial relaxation.     

Endoscopic sphincteroplasty: a novel and safe alternative to papillotomy in the management of bile duct stones.

Removal of bile duct stones during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) usually includes papillotomy. Papillotomy is associated with occasional complications and in addition, the longterm sequelae of papillotomy in young patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain unclear. As an alternative to papillotomy, this study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty to facilitate bile duct clearance. Of 32 patients with bile duct stones (diameter 3-30 mm) at ERCP, sphincteroplasty was considered inappropriate in four patients because of stone size (> 20 mm) necessitating papillotomy for bile duct clearance. Sphincteroplasty was performed in the remaining 28 patients to permit duct clearance by dormier basket, balloon or mechanical lithotripsy. The bile duct was cleared in 22 patients (79%) while additional measures including papillotomy or stent insertion were required in the remaining six patients (21%) because of stone size or technical difficulties. There was no associated papillary haemorrhage. Pancreatitis was seen in one patient (4%) but resolved within 24 hours. Our preliminary experience suggests that sphincteroplasty is a safe and effective sphincter preservation technique that significantly reduces the necessity for papillotomy in the management of bile duct stones.     

Fortuitous discovery of common bile duct stones: results of a conservative strategy

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of fortuitously discovered stones in the common bile duct is about 5%. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of spontaneous clearance of asymptomatic stones in the common bile duct discovered fortuitously during cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in all patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. If a filling defect of the common bile duct was discovered, a transcystic drain was inserted. Surgical or endoscopic extraction was not proposed initially. A control cholangiogram was performed on the second postoperative day then during the sixth postoperative week. If a stone persisted at the sixth week, endoscopic extraction was undertaken. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy was performed in 124 patients with symptomatic gallstones and no signs predictive of stones in the common bile duct. A stone was found fortuitously in the common bile duct in 12 patients. The control cholangiogram was normal in two of these patients on day two (16.7%) and in six others (50%) at the six-week control. All 12 patients remained free of symptoms suggesting the presence of a stone in the common duct. Presence of the drain had no impact on quality-of-life. Endoscopic extraction was finally performed for four patients (33.3%) to remove a stone from the common bile duct. CONCLUSION: Early surgical or endoscopic extraction of stones in the common bile duct should not be undertaken systematically in asymptomatic patients. Spontaneous asymptomatic clearance of the common bile duct is observed in about half of patients.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: A single-stage minimally invasive procedure would be optimal for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Two alternative strategies are available: management by laparoscopy alone or a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach. This study evaluates the results of the latter procedure. METHODS: From June 1993 to September 1997, 1400 patients with symptomatic biliary stone disease were evaluated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed on the basis of a preoperative suspicion of bile duct stones; bile duct stone treatment was by intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed because of a preoperative suspicion of a bile duct abnormality in 141 of 1400 patients (10%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of biliary stone disease. Of those 141 patients, 54 (38.3%) presented with pathologic findings (bile duct stone [52] and papillary stenosis [2]); all 54 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of the ductal stones was achieved in 43 patients (82.7%) by intraoperative sphincterotomy, and in 9 patients by an additional postoperative endoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in all cases. There were no conversions to an open operation. Postoperative course in the uncomplicated cases was comparable to that for laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. The postoperative complication rate was 5.6% and mortality 1.8%. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days (range 2 to 16). At a mean 38 months follow-up, no complications related to the laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach seems to be a feasible and effective management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, saving patients a subsequent invasive procedure.     

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in Billroth II gastrectomy patients with bile duct stones

Background and Aims: Patients with Billroth II (B‐II) gastrectomy present technical difficulties during endoscopic stone removal due to altered anatomy. Although endoscopic sphincterotomy alone or endoscopic balloon dilation alone has been used for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B‐II gastrectomy, the results are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B‐II gastrectomy. Methods: Twenty‐six patients (20 men and six women; median age 72 years) with bile duct stones and a history of B‐II gastrectomy were enrolled. After cannulation, limited endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. Then, balloon dilation (balloon size, 10–15 mm) was performed and stones were removed conventionally or via mechanical lithotripsy. Successful stone removal and complications were evaluated. Results: In all cases, stones were successfully removed. The median number of sessions for complete stone removal was one (range 1–3). Stone removal by mechanical lithotripsy was achieved in three patients (11.5%). There were no significant complications, such as bleeding, pancreatitis, or perforation. Conclusions: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation is an effective and safe method for removal of bile duct stones. We suggest consideration of this technique for removal of bile duct stones in patients with B‐II gastrectomy.     

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones

AIM:To investigate the efficacy and outcomes of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD)for bile duct stones in a multicenter prospective study.METHODS:Lithotomy by EPLBD was conducted in 124patients with bile duct stones≥13 mm in size or with three or more bile duct stones≥10 mm.After endoscopic sphincterotomy,the papilla was dilated using balloons 12-20 mm in diameter fitting the bile duct diameter.RESULTS:The success rate of first-time lithotomy was 86.3%(107/124)and the final lithotomy success rate was 100%(124/124).Lithotripsy was needed in10 of the 124(13.6%)patients.Adverse events due to the treatment procedure occurred in 6(4.8%)patients,all of which were mild.Performing large balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with large stones or multiple stones in the bile duct is considered to ensure the safety of treatment and to reduce the need for lithotripsy.CONCLUSION:It is suggested that treatment by EPLBD for large bile duct stones may be safe and useful.     

The role of percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation in percutaneous choledochoscopic lithotomy

BACKGROUND: When choledochoscopic lithotomy with basket and electrohydraulic lithotripsy is used to remove intrahepatic duct stones, fragments or small stones usually remain in the bile duct that are too small to be captured with a basket. METHODS: An attempt was made to remove stone fragments in 16 patients with intrahepatic duct stones by antegrade balloon dilation of the sphincter of Oddi with a conventional balloon catheter. After balloon dilation, remnant stones and sludge were pushed through the papilla with the choledochoscope. RESULTS: Bile duct stones were completely removed in 12 of 16 patients (75%); stones were removed in 1 session. There was no clinical evidence of procedure-related pancreatitis or fatal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation of the sphincter of Oddi and clearance of remnant bile duct stones and stone fragments with the tip of choledochoscope is simple and effective in patients undergoing percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotomy.     

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term outcome of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial that compared long-term outcomes after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy was conducted. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with bile duct stones were randomized to endoscopic papillary balloon dilation or endoscopic sphincterotomy, with 16 patients in each group. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was performed by using an 8-mm-diameter balloon; endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in the standard manner. The success rates for stone removal, as well as the frequency and types of early (<15 days), mid-term (<1 year), and long-term (1-6 years) post-procedure complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The success rates for stone removal and early complication rates were similar for both groups. The frequency of stone recurrence was approximately 4-fold higher in the endoscopic papillary balloon dilation group (25%) vs. the endoscopic sphincterotomy group (6.3%) at mid-term evaluation. However, over the long term, Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of stone recurrence tended to be higher in the endoscopic sphincterotomy group vs. the endoscopic papillary balloon dilation group; recurrent stones were found in, respectively, 26.7% vs. 6.3%. Complications occurred in 7 patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal is satisfactory, provided that consideration is given to recurrence of stones by early follow-up evaluation.     

Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography can optimise the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocholithiasis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative endosonography has been proposed as a cost-effective procedure in the management of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy having an intermediate risk of common bile duct stones. We prospectively evaluated the impact of pre-operative endosonography on the management of patients facing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocolithiasis. METHODS: Among 587 consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 47 (8%) patients having one or more abnormal liver function tests but a normal appearance of common bile duct at abdominal ultrasound, underwent pre-operative endosonography. In patients with endosonography-detected common bile duct stones, a pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed, or an intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was scheduled. In all endosonography-negative patients, an intra-operative trans-cystic cholangiography was performed. RESULTS: Endosonography detected common bile duct stones in nine patients (19%) but only in five of them stones were radiologically confirmed (PPV 0.55). Endosonography-detected stones were confirmed in four of four (100%) patients in whom cholangiography was performed within 1 week, but only in one of five (20%) patients in whom radiology was further delayed (P < 0.05). In three of four cases (75%), stones detected at endosonography but not confirmed at X-rays, were smaller than 2.0 mm. Among 38 patients with negative endosonography, common bile duct stones were found in two patients (NPV 0.95), whereas unplanned endoscopic stone extraction was needed only in one patient (NPV 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative endosonography can spare unnecessary pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as well as inappropriate scheduling of intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests. To maximise the impact of endosonography on the management of these patients, the procedure should be performed immediately before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract

BACKGROUND: Bile duct stones are still present in 10% to 15% of patients after the application of conventional endoscopic extraction techniques and require additional procedures for duct clearance. In the vast majority of these cases, there are 2 main problems: large stone size (>15 mm) and tapering of distal bile duct. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients in whom endoscopic sphincterotomy and standard basket/balloon extraction were unsuccessful in the removal of bile duct stones underwent dilation with a 10- to 20-mm diameter (esophageal/pyloric type) balloon at the same session. In 18 patients with tapered distal bile ducts (Group 1), 12- to 18-mm diameter balloon catheters were used to enlarge the orifice. In 40 patients with square, barrel shaped and/or large (>15mm) stones (Group 2), the sphincterotomy orifice was enlarged with 15- to 20-mm diameter balloon catheters. After dilatation, standard basket/balloon extraction techniques were used to remove the stone(s). RESULTS: Stone clearance was successful in 16 patients (89%) in Group 1 and 35 (95%) in Group 2. Complications occurred in 9 (15.5%) patients. CONCLUSION: Dilation with a large-diameter balloon after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a useful alternative technique in patients with bile duct stones that are difficult to remove with standard methods.     

Prognostic factors for recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment by sphincter dilation

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome for patients after endoscopic sphincter of Oddi dilation is poorly documented. This study investigates the recurrence rate for bile duct stones in patients followed for 1 year or more after endoscopic sphincter dilation and stone extraction, and assessed prognostic factors associated with recurrence of ductal calculi. METHODS: A total of 169 patients with bile duct stones were treated with endoscopic sphincter dilation between July 1998 and August 2001. Follow-up studies consisted of periodic biochemical tests and out-patient evaluations with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or magnetic resonance cholangiography performed when follow-up exceeded 1 year. Putative risk factors for stone recurrence included gender, age, stone size and number, associated peripapillary diverticulum, gallbladder status, color of bile duct stones, and bile duct diameter. Statistical analysis consisted of both a Kaplan-Meier estimation and a multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 162 (95.8%) patients, of whom 151 were followed (13 patients died from unrelated disorders). Mean follow-up was 23 months. Stone recurrence was documented in 13 patients. Patients with dilated bile duct or peripapillary diverticulum were at high risk for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The interval between treatment of bile duct stones by endoscopic sphincter dilation and the recurrence of biliary calculi is relatively short. Bile duct size and peripapillary diverticula are risk factors for early recurrence.     

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of common bile duct stones in the elderly

From May 1996 through August 1998, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was performed to remove common bile duct stones in 17 elderly patients, aged 75 to 87 (average 81.9), including 7 with juxtapapillary diverticulum. The balloon-tipped biliary catheter for EPBD was inflated at a pressure of 10 atm, for 2 minutes, and the maximum diameter of the inflated balloon reached 8 or 10 mm. After one or two ERCP sessions using EPBD alone, the bile duct stones were removed in 16 (94.1%) of 17 patients, and endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy was required in 6 (35.3%) patients. Another patient required additional sphincterotomy for removal of the stone. Massive bleeding or intestinal perforation, which can be major complications of EPBD, did not occur, and while the minor complication of transient abdominal pain was observed in 3 patients but there was no case of pancreatitis. The clearance rates of stones and complication rates in our EPBD procedure were similar to other reports and to those of our data in younger patients, aged under 75. EPBD was a safe and effective technique for the extraction of the common bile duct stones in elderly patients.     

Percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilation as a therapeutic option for choledocholithiasis

Background

For choledocholithiasis, endoscopic therapy, including endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), is now standard. However, the procedure of endoscopic therapy is very complicated and sometimes incomplete for reasons of anatomical anomalies. Therefore, we started performing percutaneous transhepatic papillary balloon dilations (PTPBD) instead of endoscopic therapy for choledocholithiasis 1 year ago for some selected patients. We report our technical methods of PTPBD.

Methods

First, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD) was performed under ultrasound guidance. Via the drainage route, the balloon catheter was inserted until the common bile duct was reached. Then, cholangiography was performed and the stones were identified. The balloon was maintained in the inflated state with 4?ml air at the papilla of Vater for 3?min. Next, the stones were pushed out rapidly into the duodenum with the same balloon catheter. If the stone diameter was larger than 8?mm, then basket lithotripsy was performed before balloon dilation.

Results

Five patients underwent PTPBDs. The bile duct stones were successfully pushed out into the duodenum in all patients. The first three patients required two sessions for complete stone clearance due to technical problems; however, the last two patients needed only one session. There were no deaths and no complications.

Conclusions

We recommend that PTPBD might be a feasible and alternative therapeutic option for choledocholithiasis.

     

Evaluation of risk factors for recurrent primary common bile duct stone in patients with cholecystectomy

Objectives: Recurrence of primary common bile duct (CBD) stone commonly occurs after complete removal of CBD stones in patients with cholecystectomy. This study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for the recurrence of primary CBD stones after endoscopic treatment.

Materials and methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) database of our medical center was retrospectively reviewed; information regarding eligible patients who had recurrent CBD stones with a history of previous cholecystectomy was collected. The characteristics of the patients, CBD stone, CBD and ERCP-related factors were analyzed.

Results: The recurrence rate of CBD stone was 18.5% (115/622) after endoscopic treatment in patients with cholecystectomy. In univariate analysis, the number of CBD stones (≥2), CBD stone diameter (≥10?mm), stone composition, stone consistency, CBD diameter (≥15?mm), bile duct dilatation pattern, sharp bile duct angulation (<145°), balloon dilatation, large balloon (>12?mm) dilatation, endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy, endoscopic sphincterotomy, and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation alone method were significant between the non-recurrence and recurrence groups. However, in multivariate analysis (based on the binary logistic regression method), the number of CBD stones (≥2) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.232; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.344–7.773; p?=?.009), cholesterol stone (AOR 2.824; 95% CI 1.175–6.786; p?=.02) and sharp bile duct angulation (<145°) (AOR 2.462; 95% CI 1.062–5.711; p?=?.036) were independent risk factors of CBD stone recurrence after cholecystectomy.

Conclusions: CBD stone number (≥2), cholesterol stone and sharp bile duct angulation (<145°) are associated with recurrent common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy.     

Usefulness of the Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps for endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy

Background: The present study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of the Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps for extracting small common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Methods: Sixty‐one patients with common bile duct stones underwent EST. In patients with stones of 1 cm or more diameter, stones were crushed into fragments having a diameter of less than 1 cm using a mechanical lithotriptor. Stones were extracted using a conventional 4‐wire basket forceps and a stone retrieval balloon catheter. After endoscopic and fluoroscopic confirmation of the absence of stones, stone extraction was again attempted using the Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps, which consists of a 5 Fr catheter sheath and a helical 8‐wire nitinol monofilament basket. After a few days, the presence or absence of residual stones was examined by cholangiography via the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube. Results: Further extraction of stones was possible using the Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps in 47.5% (29/61) of the patients who underwent extraction of stones by a 4 wire‐basket forceps and a stone retrieval balloon catheter. Cholangiography some days after using the Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps showed residual stones in only two patients (3.3%). Conclusions: The Memory® 8‐wire basket forceps was a useful device for the accurate and rapid endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones with a diameter of less than 1 cm after EST.     

Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST) is a well-established procedure for bile duct stone extraction. Bile duct stones can be classified as primary or secondary. However, few data are available on the recurrence of primary and secondary bile duct stones after EST. Therefore risk factors for the recurrence of primary bile duct stones after EST were prospectively studied. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1997, 61 patients underwent EST for primary bile duct stones. All met the following criteria: (1) previous cholecystectomy without bile duct exploration, (2) detection of bile duct stones at least 2 years after initial cholecystectomy. Mean follow-up was 2.2 years. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. The recurrence of primary bile duct stones was defined as the detection of bile duct stones no sooner than 6 months after complete clearance of primary bile duct stones. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate of primary bile duct stones was 21% (10 of 47). Two significant risk factors for recurrence were identified by multivariate analysis: (1) patients with a bile duct diameter of 13 mm or greater after stone removal had recurrences more frequently than those with a duct diameter of 13 mm or less, and (2) patients whose papilla was located on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum, so that the papillary orifice was not visible endoscopically, had more frequent recurrences than patients with a papilla outside the diverticulum, or no peripapillary diverticulum. CONCLUSION: The independent risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones were sustained dilation of the bile duct even after complete removal of stones and location of the papilla on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum.     

Single-step treatment of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique

BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has given rise to a debate as to whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be performed before or after cholecystectomy in patients with bile duct stones. METHODS: This study evaluated the efficacy of treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in a single step by performing ERCP during surgery in 52 patients (35 women, 17 men; mean age 57.0 years; age range 20 to 89 years). Laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography via the cystic duct was carried out to confirm the presence of duct stones. A soft-tipped guidewire was passed through the cystic duct and papilla into the duodenum. A papillotome was inserted endoscopically over the guidewire. Endoscopic sphincterectomy was performed and the stones removed with balloon and basket catheters. RESULTS: Endoscopic stone removal was successful in 94% of cases without complications related to ERCP or surgery. Although operative time was lengthened by about 20 minutes, the hospital stay was as short and equal to that for simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy (3 days on average). CONCLUSIONS: The single-step combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique is safe and effective for treatment of patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.     

Predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy and endoscopic clearance of large bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Mechanical lithotripsy is used to break large bile duct stones. This study investigated the predictors of unsuccessful mechanical lithotripsy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and basket removal of stones. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed for stones of large size (>15 mm diameter) that precluded extraction intact. Success was defined as complete clearance of the duct. Various predictive factors, including size and number of stones, stone impaction, serum bilirubin, presence of cholangitis, and bile duct diameter were analyzed in relation to the success or failure of lithotripsy. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis, which was found in 401 patients. Of the latter patients, 87 had large stones that required mechanical lithotripsy. Lithotripsy was successful in 69 (79%) patients. Impaction of the stone(s) in the bile duct was the only significant factor that predicted failure of lithotripsy and consequent failure of bile duct clearance. Other factors, including stone size, were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical lithotripsy is successful in about 79% of patients with large bile duct stones. The only significant factor that predicts failure of mechanical lithotripsy is stone impaction in the bile duct.