Helicobacter pylori-induced duodenal ulcer frequently coincides with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is complicated. Evidence does not support a causal link. There have been reports, which have implicated successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori, in patients with a duodenal ulcer, with the subsequent development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, eradication of Helicobacter pylori in these patients with improvement in their condition and a return to normal lifestyle, weight gain and discontinuation of antacids may unmask pre-existing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIMS: To determine the true prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulceration. METHOD: Dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy were prospectively screened for the presence of a duodenal ulcer. Concomitant oesophagitis, when present, was recorded. All subjects with a Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer without endoscopic evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were invited to undergo a 24-hr ambulatory oesophageal pH assessment prior to receiving treatment. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with a duodenal ulcer were identified and 83.5% were Helicobacter pylori positive. Overall, 27.8% had associated endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis, 70% grade I-II and 30% grade III-IV. Of those without evidence of oesophagitis at endoscopy, 68% underwent a 24-hr pH assessment. An additional 17% were identified by this means as having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Overall, 44% of symptomatic subjects with Helicobacter pylori and a duodenal ulcer were found to have coexistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSION: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is frequently found to coexist with Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer. In addition, almost 20% of symptomatic patients without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis will have an abnormal oesophageal pH exposure. It is plausible that the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease following successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori represents unmasking of existing disease rather than de novo development.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori: lack of influence of infection on oesophageal manometric, 3-hour postprandial pHmetric and endoscopic findings

AIM: To investigate the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease according to manometric and pHmetric findings. METHOD: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with reflux symptoms and endoscopic evidence of mild oesophagitis, were recruited. Manometry and ambulatory pHmetry were performed in all patients, as well as the 3-hour postprandial pHmetry, as a more flexible and well tolerable test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between Helicobacter pylori positive and negative patients regarding age, sex ratio and endoscopic severity of oesophagitis. There was no difference in prevalence of abnormal oesophageal peristalsis between the two groups (Fisher's exact test, p=NS). Differences were also not found regarding lower oesophageal sphincter pressure between the two groups (mean PLOS 12.86+/-4.39 mmHg and 13.1+/-4.61 mmHg respectively; p=0.840). Finally, the mean values of DeMeester score were 60.38+/-48.04 and 67.64+/-51.04 respectively (p=0.576). CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori infection does not influence oesophageal peristalsis, the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and the acidity of refluxates into the oesophageal lumen, in patients with established gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (esophagitis grade A and B).     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on development of dyspeptic and reflux disease in healthy asymptomatic subjects

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are few data on the course of Helicobacter pylori infection in asymptomatic subjects. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of eradication therapy on the development of dyspeptic and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a cohort of asymptomatic individuals observed over a prolonged period. METHODS: A total of 169 blood donors infected with H pylori who had volunteered for studies on eradication in 1990 formed the cohort. To be included in this cohort subjects had to have no symptoms, as determined by a validated symptom questionnaire at the baseline visit. Eighty eight subjects were infected with H pylori while 81 had successfully undergone eradication therapy. Subjects were followed up (annually) using the same symptom questionnaire and in 2000 they underwent repeat endoscopy. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects developed symptoms during follow up. The incidence of symptoms in H pylori positive subjects was 1.893/100 person-years of follow up and in H pylori negative individuals 0.163/100 person-years of follow up. H pylori infected subjects were significantly more likely to develop symptoms (log rank test, p=0.003) as well as those infected with CagA positive strains (log rank test, p=0.017). The development of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was no different in individuals with and without eradication (odds ratio 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.26-1.24); p=0.163). CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication prevents the development of dyspeptic symptoms and peptic ulcer disease in healthy asymptomatic blood donors and is not associated with an increase in the incidence of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori does not increase acid reflux in patients with mild to moderate reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: A substantial minority of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are infected with Helicobacter pylori, but there is controversy as to whether these patients should be treated for their infection. We hypothesized that H. pylori eradication increases gastro-oesophageal acid reflux in such patients with time. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive H. pylori-infected patients (16 M and 19 F) with mild or moderate reflux oesophagitis were enrolled. Twenty-four-hour intra-oesophageal (n = 35) and intragastric (n = 12) pH-metry was recorded before and 15 months after H. pylori eradication. Gastric biopsy specimens from the antrum and corpus were obtained from 10 consecutive patients before and 15 months after H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Fifteen months after eradication of H. pylori there was a significant decrease in percentage time oesophageal pH < 4 in the recumbent position only (P = 0.04). Despite a marked reduction in the severity of gastritis, there was no significant change in gastric acidity, total intra-oesophageal acid exposure or symptom score. Heartburn improved in 12, worsened in 7. and remained unchanged in 16 patients (P = 0.36) without any significant relationship to individual changes in acid exposure (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication does not increase gastric acidity or gastro-oesophageal acid reflux in patients with mild to moderate reflux oesophagitis over the first 15 months.     

Manometric and pH-metric features in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The role of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis and evolution of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is still debated. AIM: To investigate the impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on the oesophageal function and on intra-gastric and intra-oesophageal pH in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS: Fifty patients with non-complicated-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease classified according to Savary-Miller in: grade O, n=24; grade 1, n=19; grade 2, n=6; grade 3, n=1. Of these patients, 24 were Helicobacter pylori positive and 26 negative. Patients underwent, on two different days, stationary oesophageal manometry and 24-hour gastro-oesophageal pH-metry. RESULTS: No difference was observed between Helicobacter pylori infected and non-infected individuals with regard to lower oesophageal sphincter function, oesophageal peristalsis and gastrooesophageal reflux. These parameters were more impaired in individuals with erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but this result was not dependent on the Helicobacter pylori status. Helicobacter pylori did not influence the pattern of gastric pH; however, considering only individuals with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastric pH was significantly higher in infected individuals, who, histologically, also showed a corpus predominant gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori does not affect the oesophageal motility or the gastro-oesophageal reflux. These parameters are strictly related to the severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as assessed at endoscopy. In patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, a corpus predominant Helicobacter pylori gastritis could be responsible for the less severe gastro-oesophageal reflux.     

Relationship between intestinal metaplasia of the gastro-oesophageal junction, Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: The role of Helicobacter pylori infection and/or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia in gastric cardia is still unclear. AIMS: To prospectively evaluate prevalence of inflammation and intestinal metaplasia of cardia in relationship to Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and in healthy controls. PATIENTS: A total of 122 consecutive patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and 49 control subjects were included. METHODS: During endoscopy, a total of six biopsies were taken from antrum, corpus and cardia. Helicobacter pylori infection was assessed by histology and rapid urease test. Degree of chronic gastritis, inflammatory activity and Helicobacter pylori colonization were scored from 0 to 3. RESULTS: No difference in prevalence was observed between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients and controls as far as concerns Helicobacter pylori (41% vs 38%), inflammation of cardia (59.5% vs 70%) and intestinal metaplasia of cardia (18% vs 19%). Inflammation of cardia was significantly (p<0.001) associated with Helicobacter pylori irrespective of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Cardial intestinal metaplasia was more frequently (p=0.03) found in infected subjects ((27%) than in uncolonized subjects (13%). No relationship was observed between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and carditis and cardial intestinal metaplasia. Cardial intestinal metaplasia was more frequently detected in association with carditis (26% vs 6%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia are not markers of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but are related to Helicobacter pylori.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Sudan: a clinical endoscopic and histopathological study.

This study was conducted to assess the frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus among Sudanese patients with clinical symptoms of heartburn. One hundred and five patients were included in the study; forty seven patients had evidence of reflux oesophagitis, 61.7% of whom had grade B oesophagitis according to the modified Los Angeles classification and 10.6% had Barrett's oesophagus. 78.7% of the biopsies from the esophageal cardia revealed presenced of inflammation (Carditis). Dysplasia was documented in 21.3% of these biopsies. Helicobacter pylori was detected 59.6% of gastrooesophageal reflux disease patients and 56.8% of patients with carditis. However, 80% of patients with Barrett oesophagus were positive for Helicobacter pylori. It was concluded that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease affects all age groups with males being affected more than females and Helicobacter pylori infection did not play a major role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease orits complications.     

Acid exposure and altered acid clearance in GERD patients treated for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: After the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, an increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid gastric secretion have been reported. AIM: To evaluate the effect of Helicobacter pylori-eradication on proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux and acid clearance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight gastroesophageal reflux disease patients (age range 18-61 years) were studied by upper endoscopy. All underwent esophageal manometry and dual probe 24-h pH-metry. RESULTS: Percent of time at pH<4 was significantly increased in the proximal esophagus of Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients compared to Helicobacter pylori-negative (2.4+/-0.5 vs. 1.0+/-0.2; p<0.01); no differences were found in the distal esophagus (14.0+/-3.7 vs. 9.0+/-1.4%, NS). The total number of reflux episodes was significantly higher in the proximal oesophagus of Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients (37+/-3 vs. 22+/-3, p<0.05). In the distal esophagus, acid clearance was significantly longer, both during total time (1.4+/-0.2 vs. 0.8+/-0.7 min, p<0.01), and in the supine period (8.5+/-2.7 vs. 2.7+/-0.4 min, p<0.05). No differences were reported in the manometric parameters of the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori eradication is associated with increased acid exposure of the proximal esophagus and delayed distal acid clearance.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux and duodenogastric reflux before and after eradication in Helicobacter pylori gastritis

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori and duodenogastric reflux (DGR) are both associated with chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. The nature of their interrelationship remains unclear. H. pylori eradication has also been reported to result in new or worsening acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between GOR, DGR and H. pylori infection. METHOD: 25 patients with H. pylori gastritis underwent ambulatory 24-hour oesophageal and gastric pHmetry and gastric bilirubin monitoring before and 12 weeks after H. pylori eradication, confirmed by 14C urea breath testing (UBT). Ten healthy subjects served as a control group. RESULTS: There were no differences between patient and control groups for gastric alkaline exposure or gastric bilirubin exposure (P> 0.25 in all categories). Oesophageal acid reflux was higher in the study group (P< 0.02). No differences were detected in oesophageal acid reflux, gastric alkaline exposure, or gastric bilirubin exposure (P = 0.35, 0.18 and 0.11, respectively) before and after eradication. CONCLUSIONS: Acid GOR is not increased by H. pylori eradication. DGR in patients with H. pylori gastritis is similar to that in healthy, non-infected subjects. H. pylori eradication produces no change in GOR or DGR. In patients with chronic gastritis, H. pylori infection and DGR appear to be independent of each other.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial

BACKGROUND: The role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is controversial. We hypothesised that H pylori eradication leads to worsened control of reflux disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients with weekly reflux symptoms were prospectively recruited for endoscopy and symptom evaluation. Patients were enrolled if they had H pylori infection and required long term acid suppressants. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to omeprazole triple therapy (HpE group) or omeprazole with placebo antibiotics (Hp+ group) for one week. Omeprazole 20 mg daily was given for eight weeks for healing of oesophagitis and symptom relief. This was followed by a maintenance dose of 10 mg daily for up to 12 months. The primary study end point was the probability of treatment failure within 12 months, which was defined as either incomplete resolution of symptoms or oesophagitis at the initial treatment phase, or relapse of symptoms and oesophagitis during the maintenance phase. Predictors of treatment failure were determined by Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 236 GORD patients were screened and 113 (47.9%) were positive for H pylori; 104 (92%) patients were included in the intention to treat analysis (53 in the HpE group and 51 in the Hp+ group). Thirty one patients (30%) had erosive oesophagitis at baseline. H pylori was eradicated in 98% of the HpE group and in 3.9% of the Hp+ group. Overall, 15 patients (28.3%) in the HpE group and eight patients (15.7%) in the Hp+ group had treatment failure. The 12 month probability of treatment failure was 43.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 29.9-56.5%) in the HpE group and 21.1% (95% CI 9.9-32.3%) in the Hp+ group (log rank test, p = 0.043). In the Cox proportional hazards model, after adjustment for the covariates age, sex, erosive oesophagitis, hiatus hernia, degree of gastritis, and severity of symptoms at baseline, H pylori eradication was the only predictor of treatment failure (adjusted hazard ratio 2.47 (95% CI 1.05-5.85)). CONCLUSION: H pylori eradication leads to more resilient GORD.     

The incidence of reflux oesophagitis after eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have indicated that Helicobacter pylori eradication develops reflux oesophagitis, others reported that its eradication had a beneficial effect on reflux symptoms. The results are still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To study whether H. pylori eradication increases the occurrence rate of reflux oesophagitis in patients with peptic ulcers. METHOD: One hundred and two consecutive patients who had peptic ulcers and were H. pylori-positive by C-urea breath testing were followed prospectively. They all received 1-week triple therapy and underwent endoscopy at 1-year intervals or when relapse of the peptic ulcer or occurrence of reflux oesophagitis was suspected. RESULTS: Reflux oesophagitis developed in 32 (31.4%) out of 102 patients and they were of grade A (27 patients) and grade B (five patients) by the Los Angeles classification System. H. pylori infection was cured in 77 (75.5%) out of 102 patients. There was no significant difference in age (53.4+/-1.2 vs. 53.9+/-1.4 years, P = 0.43), gender (male/female, 29/3 vs. 53/17, P = 0.14), ulcer location (gastric/duodenal/both, 15/12/5 vs. 35/26/9, P = 0.97), H. pylori status (persistent/cured, 9/23 vs. 16/54, P = 0.57) or length of follow-up time (355+/-32 vs. 348+/-23 days, P = 0.30) between the 32 patients with reflux oesophagitis and the other 70 patients. Only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significant for the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis by the log-rank test (P = 0.002), and the Cox proportional hazard models confirmed these findings (odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-7.30; P = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication of H. pylori did not increase the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis, and only the presence of hiatal hernia before therapy was significantly related to the development of reflux oesophagitis.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori

The interaction between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been the subject of intense scrutiny in recent years. Although the evidence base is incomplete it is now sufficient to clarify a number of key questions. H. pylori is not a risk factor for reflux disease. Similarly, H. pylori infection, in most patients, is not 'protective' against the risk of developing reflux and oesophagitis. Furthermore, reflux and oesophagitis are not more likely to develop or to worsen after H. pylori eradication therapy and eradication does not make control of reflux symptoms with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy more difficult. Long term PPI therapy in the presence of H. pylori infection does increase the rate at which gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia develop. Eradication therapy has been shown to reduce this risk. In the uninfected stomach, PPIs are associated with a low likelihood of these adverse histological changes. PPI therapy reduces the accuracy of diagnostic tests for H. pylori. The decision to test for and treat H. pylori infection in the context of reflux must be individualised based on patient factors including co-morbidity, age, gastric histology, family history and informed choice. Distinction must be made between treating symptoms and potentially reducing risks. A decision not to test for and treat H. pylori is now just as active a choice as is the decision to test and treat. Recent international consensus statements recommend eradication of H. pylori prior to long term PPI therapy in reflux disease, although there is not a universal agreement on this. Further research to clarify the risk and benefits of such an approach is required.     

Symptomatic benefit 1-3 years after H. pylori eradication in ulcer patients: impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection markedly reduces the recurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcers. However, there is little information regarding its efficacy in resolving dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of eradicating H. pylori infection on dyspeptic symptoms in ulcer patients. The secondary aim was to identify predictors of symptomatic response to H. pylori eradication. METHODS: A total of 97 dyspeptic patients with active duodenal and/or gastric ulceration associated with H. pylori infection and unrelated to NSAID use had the severity and character of their dyspeptic symptoms measured before and again 1-3 yr after H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: Pretreatment, the median dyspepsia score was 12 (4-16). Posttreatment, 55% of those eradicated of H. pylori had resolution of dyspepsia (score <2) compared with 18% of those not eradicated of the infection (95% CI for difference, 11-62%). Of the ulcer patients 31% had symptoms and/or endoscopic evidence of coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at initial presentation and this influenced the symptomatic response to eradication of H. pylori. Of the 22 patients with heartburn or acid reflux as the predominant presenting symptom, but no endoscopic esophagitis, only 27% experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication, compared with 68% of the 59 without those as predominant symptoms (95% CI for difference, 18-63%). Only one of the five patients with coexisting endoscopic esophagitis at initial presentation experienced resolution of dyspepsia after H. pylori eradication. Symptomatic benefit was unrelated to time lapsed since the infection was eradicated. Only three of 50 subjects developed de novo GERD symptoms after eradication of H. pylori, whereas 21 of 36 subjects experienced resolution of GERD symptoms after eradication of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of ulcer patients have symptoms and/or signs of coexisting GERD at initial presentation and this reduces the symptomatic benefit from H. pylori eradication. However, we have found no evidence that eradicating H. pylori induces de novo GERD symptoms in ulcer patients.     

Helicobacter pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy in patients with GORD—crossover comparative study with famotidine and low-dose lansoprazole

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Helicobacter pylori infection was reported to affect gastric acid secretion. We investigated the heartburn symptoms of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during sequential treatment with 40 mg of famotidine or 15 mg of lansoprazole to clarify whether H. pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 33 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, who had already been treated with a full dose of H2 receptor antagonist. First, famotidine at 20 mg b.i.d. was administered to the patients for 8 weeks. Second, famotidine was replaced with 15 mg of lansoprazole once in the morning for 8 weeks. Finally, 20 mg of famotidine was administered b.i.d. for 8 weeks instead of lansoprazole. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms were assessed using an original visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The sequential symptomatic responses to famotidine and lansoprazole administration indicated that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms of patients during low-dose lansoprazole treatment were significantly less than those during famotidine treatment. Remission of symptoms was obtained significantly more often by famotidine therapy in patients with H. pylori infection than in patients without H. pylori infection. CONCLUSION: Low-dose lansoprazole is more effective than full-dose famotidine for the control of symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and H. pylori infection influences the symptomatic response to H2 receptor antagonists.     

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: The effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of H. pylori eradication in this group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients with H. pylori infection and reflux esophagitis (grade 1 or 2) were enrolled into the study. Twenty-four hour intra-esophageal pH recording and esophageal manometry were performed before and 3 months after eradication of H. pylori, which was achieved using lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. H. pylori was evaluated in biopsy specimens taken from the antrum and corpus by rapid urease test and by histopathologic examination before and 3 months after eradication. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (11 men and 7 women, median age 42 years) completed the study. Three months after the treatment, there was no significant change in any of the 24-hour esophageal pH recording parameters and mean lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (P > 0.05). The percentage of total time esophageal pH <4 increased in 10 patients, and decreased in 8 patients. There was a significant decrease in the scores of heartburn and regurgitation (P < 0.01). Esophagitis persisted in 16 patients and disappeared in 2 patients. Esophagitis score decreased in 6 patients, and did not change in 12 patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication does not have any effect on gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis 3 months after eradication, but significant improvement is achieved in some reflux associated symptoms.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication does not exacerbate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The reciprocal influence of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), if both conditions occur concomitantly, has been an issue of debate for many years. The critical question is whether eradication of H pylori has a more beneficial, harmful, or simply no effect on the course of GORD.     

Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with reflux oesophagitis treated with long term omeprazole reverses gastritis without exacerbation of reflux disease: results of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori gastritis may progress to glandular atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, conditions that predispose to gastric cancer. Profound suppression of gastric acid is associated with increased severity of H pylori gastritis. This prospective randomised study aimed to investigate whether H pylori eradication can influence gastritis and its sequelae during long term omeprazole therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). METHODS: A total of 231 H pylori positive GORD patients who had been treated for > or =12 months with omeprazole maintenance therapy (OM) were randomised to either continuation of OM (OM only; n = 120) or OM plus a one week course of omeprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin (OM triple; n = 111). Endoscopy with standardised biopsy sampling as well as symptom evaluation were performed at baseline and after one and two years. Gastritis was assessed according to the Sydney classification system for activity, inflammation, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and H pylori density. RESULTS: Corpus gastritis activity at entry was moderate or severe in 50% and 55% of the OM only and OM triple groups, respectively. In the OM triple group, H pylori was eradicated in 90 (88%) patients, and activity and inflammation decreased substantially in both the antrum and corpus (p<0.001, baseline v two years). Atrophic gastritis also improved in the corpus (p<0.001) but not in the antrum. In the 83 OM only patients with continuing infection, there was no change in antral and corpus gastritis activity or atrophy, but inflammation increased (p<0.01). H pylori eradication did not alter the dose of omeprazole required, or reflux symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most H pylori positive GORD patients have a corpus predominant pangastritis during omeprazole maintenance therapy. Eradication of H pylori eliminates gastric mucosal inflammation and induces regression of corpus glandular atrophy. H pylori eradication did not worsen reflux disease or lead to a need for increased omeprazole maintenance dose. We therefore recommend eradication of H pylori in GORD patients receiving long term acid suppression.     

Assessment of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in Italian physicians -- a survey by Reflux Disease Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms in physicians, as compared to that of the general population, is not known. METHODS: We submitted a validated Italian version of a simple questionnaire (Reflux Disease Questionnaire) to 490 physicians and 430 controls to assess: (i) the presence, frequency and severity of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms in the two populations; (ii) how the self-assessment of troublesome gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms by physicians correlate with a pathological Reflux Disease Questionnaire, judged on the basis of a total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score >or=8. RESULTS: A valid and complete questionnaire was obtained in 456/490 (93.1%) physicians and 367/430 (85.3%) controls. Between the two groups there were no differences in terms of total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score or individual items, with the only exception of "severity of burning feeling behind breastbone" which was significantly higher in the physician group. An excellent correlation was found between the self-assessment by physician and the total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms among Italian doctors is not different from that reported by a matched control group, and that their ability in self-assessing a troublesome gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is optimal.     

A 1 year follow-up study of the consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients: unchanged frequency of erosive oesophagitis and decreased prevalence of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Discussions concerning the increased incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) after Helicobacter pylori eradication continue. In this study we aimed to evaluate the presence of co-existing GORD in (1) duodenal ulcer patients after successful H. pylori eradication, (2) patients with persistent H. pylori infection after attempts at eradication, and (3) controls in whom H. pylori eradication had not been attempted. METHODS: A prospective study of 255 patients with duodenal ulcer who were assigned to H. pylori eradication or to control treatment (omeprazole for 4 weeks) and followed up for 1 year or until peptic ulcer relapse. GORD was determined in the patients who had reflux oesophagitis on endoscopy at the beginning of the study and/or in patients without reflux oesophagitis if they experienced heartburn and/or regurgitation at least twice a week associated with impairment of daily activities. RESULTS: The study revealed a significant decrease (from 44.6% to 21.7%; P < 0.001) of patients with GORD at the end of the follow-up among those in whom H. pylori eradication had been successful. There was no significant difference in the frequency of reflux oesophagitis before and after the follow-up regardless of H. pylori status. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication did not significantly influence the prevalence and incidence of reflux oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer during a 1 year follow-up period, but there was a significantly lower prevalence of GORD after successful H. pylori eradication, as patients with non-erosive GORD had been cured.     

Effectiveness of acid suppression in preventing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after successful treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

There is evidence that Helicobacter pylori eradication might predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this prospective study was to examine the effectiveness of antisecretory treatment, after successful H. pylori eradication, in preventing GERD, since no data exist so far. Eighty initially H. pylori(+) patients, without GERD at the time of H. pylori eradication [50 peptic ulcer (PU) and 30 nonulcer (NU), 55 men, 25 women, median age 38 years, range 19–57], after successful H. pylori eradication were randomized to recieve either omeprazole 20 mg daily (group A) or no treatment (group B) for one year. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at 0, 6, and 12 months or when GERD symptoms occurred. There were 40 patients in each group, and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body weight, ulcer/no ulcer ratio, and other demographic data. Seven patients from group A and five patients from group B were lost to follow-up, and therefore there were 33 and 35 patients in groups A and B, respectively, who completed the study. One of 33 patients in group A (3%) and 10/35 (28.5%) in group B developed GERD symptoms during follow-up (P = 0.0022). The respective values for esophagitis were 0/33(0%) and 6/35(17.1%) (P = 0.0083). In conclusion, antisecretory treatment in H. pylori(+) patients, after successful eradication, is effective in preventing GERD.