Portal vein thrombosis: What is new?

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the most common vascular disorders of the liver with significant morbidity and mortality. Large cohort studies have reported a global prevalence of 1%, but in some risk groups it can be up to 26%. Causes of PVT are cirrhosis, hepatobiliary malignancy, abdominal infectious or inflammatory diseases, and myeloproliferative disorders. Most patients with PVT have a general risk factor. The natural history of PVT results in portal hypertension leading to splenomegaly and the formation of portosystemic collateral blood vessels and esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and jejunal varices. Diagnosis of PVT is made by imaging, mainly Doppler ultrasonography. According to its time of development, localization, pathophysiology, and evolution, PVT should be classified in every patient. Some clinical features such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic transplantation are areas of special interest and are discussed in this review. The goal of treatment of acute PVT is to reconstruct the blocked veins. Endoscopic variceal ligation is safe and highly effective in patients with variceal bleeding caused by chronic PVT. In conclusion, PVT is the most common cause of vascular disease of the liver and its prevalence has being increasing, especially among patients with an underlying liver disease. All patients should be investigated for thrombophilic conditions, and in those with cirrhosis, anticoagulation prophylaxis should be considered.     

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus and preexisting liver disease-a bidirectional relationship affecting treatment and management

Liver cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus(DM) are both common conditions with significant socioeconomic burden and impact on morbidity and mortality. A bidirectional relationship exists between DM and liver cirrhosis regarding both etiology and disease-related complications. Type 2 DM(T2 DM) is a wellrecognized risk factor for chronic liver disease and vice-versa, DM may develop as a complication of cirrhosis, irrespective of its etiology. Liver transplantation(LT) represents an important treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD), which represents a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and a common complication of T2 DM. The metabolic risk factors including immunosuppressive drugs, can contribute to persistent or de novo development of DM and NAFLD after LT.T2 DM, obesity, cardiovascular morbidities and renal impairment, frequently associated with metabolic syndrome and NAFLD, may have negative impact on short and long-term outcomes following LT. The treatment of DM in the context of chronic liver disease and post-transplant is challenging, but new emerging therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1 RAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors(SGLT2 i) targeting multiple mechanisms in the shared pathophysiology of disorders such as oxidative stress and chronic inflammation are a promising tool in future patient management.     

肝硬化门静脉血栓的发病机制研究进展

门静脉血栓(portal vein thrombosis,PVT)是肝硬化患者常见的并发症,与门静脉高压导致的血流瘀滞、血管内皮损伤、高凝状态、脾切除等因素相关.严重PVT的存在降低肝移植后患者的生存率,对肝硬化患者PVT发病机制的进一步认识,有助于对高危人群进行早期筛查,具有重要临床意义.     

Nontumoral Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Challenging Consequence of Liver Cirrhosis

Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognized complication in patients with cirrhosis. Substantial evidence shows that portal flow stasis, complex thrombophilic disorders, and exogenous factors leading to endothelial dysfunction have emerged as key factors in the pathogenesis of PVT. The contribution of PVT to hepatic decompensation and mortality in cirrhosis is debatable; however, the presence of an advanced PVT increases operative complexity and decreases survival after transplantation. The therapeutic decision for PVT is often determined by the duration and extent of thrombosis, the presence of symptoms, and liver transplant eligibility. Evidence from several cohorts has demonstrated that anticoagulation treatment with vitamin K antagonist or low molecular weight heparin can achieve recanalization of the portal vein, which is associated with a reduction in portal hypertension-related events and improved survival in cirrhotic patients with PVT. Consequently, interest in direct oral anticoagulants for PVT is increasing, but clinical data in cirrhosis are limited. Although the most feared consequence of anticoagulation is bleeding, most studies indicate that anticoagulation therapy for PVT in cirrhosis appears relatively safe. Interestingly, the data showed that transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt represents an effective adjunctive therapy for PVT in cirrhotic patients with symptomatic portal hypertension if anticoagulation is ineffective. Insufficient evidence regarding the optimal timing, modality, and duration of therapy makes nontumoral PVT a challenging consequence of cirrhosis. In this review, we summarize the current literature and provide a potential algorithm for the management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.     

Therapeutic and clinical aspects of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis(PVT) is a frequent complication in cirrhosis, particularly in advanced stages of the disease. As for general venous thromboembolism, risk factors for PVT are slow blood flow, vessel wall damage and hypercoagulability, all features of advanced cirrhosis. Actually, the old dogma of a hemorrhagic tendency in cirrhosis has been challenged by new laboratory tools and the clinical evidence that venous thrombosis also occurs in cirrhosis. The impaired hepatic synthesis of both pro- and anticoagulants leads to a rebalanced hemostasis, more liable to be tipped towards thrombosis or even bleeding. Conventional anticoagulant drugs(low molecular weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists) may be used in cirrhosis patients with PVT, particularly in those eligible for liver transplantation, to prevent thrombosis progression thus permitting/facilitating liver transplant. However, several doubts exist on the level of anticoagulation achieved as estimated by coagulation tests, on the efficacy of treatment monitoring and on the correct timing for discontinuation in non-transplant candidates, while in transplant candidates there is expert consensus on continuing anticoagulation until transplantation. The recent introduction of direct acting oral anticoagulant drugs(DOACs) in other clinical settings generates much interest on their possible application in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. However, DOACs were not evaluated yet in patients with liver disease and cannot be recommended for the present time.     

Acute kidney injury spectrum in patients with chronic liver disease:Where do we stand?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and is of the utmost clinical and prognostic relevance. Patients with cirrhosis, especially decompensated cirrhosis, are more prone to develop AKI than those without cirrhosis. The hepatorenal syndrome type of AKI (HRS–AKI), a spectrum of disorders in prerenal chronic liver disease, and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the two most common causes of AKI in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Differentiating these conditions is essential due to the differences in treatment. Prerenal AKI, a more benign disorder, responds well to plasma volume expansion, while ATN requires more specific renal support and is associated with substantial mortality. HRS–AKI is a facet of these two conditions, which are characterized by a dysregulation of the immune response. Recently, there has been progress in better defining this clinical entity, and studies have begun to address optimal care. The present review synopsizes the current diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities of HRS–AKI and as well as AKI in other chronic liver diseases (non-HRS–AKI) so that early recognition of HRS–AKI and the appropriate management can be established.     

Syndrome de Budd-Chiari

The management of the Budd-Chiari syndrome improved dramatically during the last 10 years and includes less invasive diagnostic modalities using modern imaging, identification of a myeloproliferative disorder in 20 to 50 % of the patients using the V617F JAK2 mutation, and a graduate therapeutic strategy. The common association of Budd-Chiari syndrome with a thrombotic disorder is a reason for a thorough work-up (myeloproliferative disorder, defect in C or S protein, factor V Leiden, factor II mutation, antiphosholipid syndrome, and other less common disorders). Ultrasonography should to be performed by an experimented examiner, informed of the diagnostic suspicion. The 5-year survival rate of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, treated with this contemporary approach (anticoagulation, treatment of the underlying cause, recanalization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, and liver transplantation) is above 80 %.     

Peritoneovenous shunting for refractory ascites results in worsening of nephrotic syndrome

Peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) is accepted as a treatment for refractory ascites due to liver cirrhosis. Infection is a well‐known complication of shunting. However, the effects of PVS in terms of complications for renal disease are unclear. We encountered a case involving a 52‐year‐old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and complications of nephrotic syndrome that were worsened by PVS. He received PVS for refractory ascites due to alcoholic liver cirrhosis before coming to our hospital for evaluation for liver transplantation. Nephrotic syndrome was then identified due to cirrhosis‐related membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN). Prednisolone was administrated at 60 mg/day for MPGN. On day 5, he showed grade IV hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven criteria). Tapering prednisolone and intestinal cleansing with lactulose treatment improved hepatic encephalopathy, but hyperammonemia persisted and the PVS was removed. After shunt removal, urinary protein levels decreased from 4–6 g/day to 0.3–0.5 g/day and ammonia levels decreased. PVS may increase the excretion of urinary protein and increase ammonia levels in patients with complications of glomerulonephritis.     

Akute Gef??komplikationen der Leber

Acute hepatic vascular complications are rare. Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BSC) are the leading causes. Coagulopathy and local factors are present in up to 80% of cases. Diagnosis is established by colour-coded Doppler sonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with acute PVT present with abdominal pain and disturbed intestinal motility. In the absence of cirrhosis anticoagulation with heparin is established followed by oral anticoagulation. In severe cases, surgical thrombectomy or transjugular thrombolysis with stent shunt may be necessary. Acute or fulminant BCS may require emergency liver transplantation or a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt, if patients present with acute liver failure. Milder cases receive anticoagulation for thrombolysis of occluded hepatic veins. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is diagnosed after total body irradiation or chemotherapy, the term SOS replacing the former veno-occlusive disease. The treatment of congenital vascular malformations, complications in the setting of OLTX as well as patients with hepatic involvement of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia requires significant expertise in a multidisciplinary approach.     

Acute hepatic vascular complications

Acute hepatic vascular complications are rare. Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BSC) are the leading causes. Coagulopathy and local factors are present in up to 80% of cases. Diagnosis is established by colour-coded Doppler sonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with acute PVT present with abdominal pain and disturbed intestinal motility. In the absence of cirrhosis anticoagulation with heparin is established followed by oral anticoagulation. In severe cases, surgical thrombectomy or transjugular thrombolysis with stent shunt may be necessary. Acute or fulminant BCS may require emergency liver transplantation or a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt, if patients present with acute liver failure. Milder cases receive anticoagulation for thrombolysis of occluded hepatic veins. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is diagnosed after total body irradiation or chemotherapy, the term SOS replacing the former veno-occlusive disease. The treatment of congenital vascular malformations, complications in the setting of OLTX as well as patients with hepatic involvement of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia requires significant expertise in a multidisciplinary approach.     

Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is observed in 10-20% of patients with liver cirrhosis, which is responsible for 20% of all PVT cases. The main pathogenic factor of PVT in cirrhosis is the obstacle to portal flow, but acquired and inherited clotting abnormalities may play a role. The formation of collateral veins allows many patients to remain asymptomatic and prevents the onset of clinical complications also in patients with totally occlusive PVT. Gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombosis of superior mesenteric vein and refractory ascites are typical manifestations of PVT. Instrumental diagnosis can be obtained by colour-doppler ultrasonography. Future studies should verify whether asymptomatic PVT worsens liver failure, or if its life-threatening complications reduce survival in patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, randomized controlled trials should clarify the potential effectiveness of anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of PVT.     

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: Controversies and latest developments

Portal vein thrombosis(PVT) is encountered in livercirrhosis, particularly in advanced disease. It has been a feared complication of cirrhosis, attributed to significant worsening of liver disease, poorer clinical outcomes and potential inoperability at liver transplantation; also catastrophic events such as acute intestinal ischaemia. Optimal management of PVT has not yet been addressed in any consensus publication.We review current literature on PVT in cirrhosis; its prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, impact on the natural history of cirrhosis and liver transplantation,and management. Studies were identified by a search strategy using MEDLINE and Google Scholar. The incidence of PVT increases with increasing severity of liver disease: less than 1% in well-compensated cirrhosis, 7.4%-16% in advanced cirrhosis. Prevalence in patients undergoing liver transplantation is 5%-16%.PVT frequently regresses instead of uniform thrombus progression. PVT is not associated with increased risk of mortality. Optimal management has not been addressed in any consensus publication. We propose areas for future research to address unresolved clinical questions.     

Correlation of routinely used coagulation parameters and presence of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

Aim:  Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. In patients with advanced stages of liver cirrhosis plasmatic coagulation and platelet count are often reduced. However, patients with normal coagulation status might carry a high risk for developing PVT. A correlation between coagulation status used in clinical routine and the incidence of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis has been evaluated in the present retrospective analysis.
Methods:  88 patients with liver cirrhosis were identified by screening a database. Of these patients, 23 suffered from PVT. Patients were classified according to the Child–Pugh classification. Patients were subdivided into early stages (Child A) and advanced stages (Child B/C) of liver cirrhosis.
Results:  In patients with Child–Pugh A cirrhosis, there was no difference in activated partial thromboplastin time (apTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and platelet count between the PVT ( n  = 7) and the control group ( n  = 35). In contrast, the median apTT and INR were significantly lower in patients with Child B/C cirrhosis and PVT ( n  = 16) in comparison with patients without PVT (37 s vs 43 s [ P  = 0.017] and 1.25 vs 1.40 [ P  = 0.022]), respectively. Platelet count did not differ significantly in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and PVT from those without PVT.
Conclusion:  Patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and PVT displayed lower apTT and INR compared with those without PVT. Therefore, patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and almost normal coagulation parameters might be at particular risk of developing PVT. The results suggest that regular monitoring using Doppler-ultrasound should be carried out in these patients, especially when liver transplantation is intended.     

Approach to the patient with chronic hepatitis B and decompensated cirrhosis

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) can develop progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with chronic HBV and cirrhosis are at risk of developing hepatic decompensation and have high mortality without antiviral therapy and/or liver transplantation. Treatment of chronic HBV with antiviral therapy is indicated in all patients with cirrhosis whatever the HBe‐antigen status and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), so that hepatic decompensation can be prevented. Initiating antiviral therapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis can improve liver function, Child‐Turcotte‐Pugh (CTP) and model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) scores, as well as the need for liver transplantation and mortality. Patients with chronic HBV and cirrhosis who do not respond to antiviral therapy with normalization of ALT may have a co‐existent liver disorder. One of the most common co‐existent liver disorders present in patients with chronic HBV is non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Patients with chronic HBV, NAFLD and cirrhosis may be at risk of developing decompensated cirrhosis and require a liver transplant. If patients with chronic HBV require liver transplantation, infection of the liver graft with HBV can be prevented with antiviral therapy.     

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la trombosis portal en la cirrosis hepática

Improved imaging techniques and the routine use of color Doppler ultrasound in the follow-up of patients with liver cirrhosis has increased diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in these patients. The extension of PVT should be evaluated with computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. The natural history of PVT in cirrhosis and its impact on liver disease is unknown but it seems clear that PVT could increase the morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation and can even be a contraindication to this procedure when the thrombus extends to the superior mesenteric vein. Anticoagulation is a relatively safe and effective treatment in achieving recanalization of the splenoportal axis or in preventing progression of thrombosis and is therefore frequently used. The use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) is reserved for patients unresponsive to anticoagulation or in those with severe complications of portal hypertension.     

Splanchnic and Extrasplanchnic Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: Prophylaxis vs Treatment

Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occur in up to 6.3 % and 15.9 % of patients with cirrhosis, respectively. There is recent evidence that a procoagulable prothrombotic state is related to cirrhosis despite the reduced levels of many coagulation factors, and decreased platelet counts. Indeed, (i) the combination of high levels of factor VIII, with low levels of protein C and antithrombin induces a procoagulant state in vitro; while (ii) increased levels of von Willebrand factor and decreased ADAMTS 13 activity can compensate for decreased platelet counts. PVT is partial in a majority of patients in whom it develops and may spontaneously resolve in some of them. Although PVT is associated with features of more severe liver disease, it is uncertain whether it plays a causal role in the decompensation of cirrhosis. In patients listed for liver transplantation, PVT may make the procedure difficult or impossible. Pre-transplant PVT is associated with increased post-transplant mortality rates. Studies evaluating clinical outcome of anticoagulation therapy for splanchnic or extrasplanchnic venous thrombosis are scarce. Anticoagulation therapy, given to patients with cirrhosis of intermediate severity before PVT occurrence, in prophylactic doses, appears to decrease decompensation and mortality rate. Interestingly, this improvement is out of proportion of the prophylaxis of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. The risk of bleeding does not seem to be increased in patients with cirrhosis receiving anticoagulation therapy, once prophylaxis for bleeding related to portal hypertension has been implemented. Overall, the room for anticoagulation therapy is probably larger than previously recognized, and may be of particular benefit in patients without portal vein thrombosis. However, clinical trials remain to be done before the benefit risk ratio of anticoagulation therapy is properly evaluated.     

Hepatic circulatory diseases associated with chronic myeloid disorders

These liver diseases are diseases of the hepatic circulation. Myeloproliferative disorders are among the most common prothrombotic disorders that lead to Budd-Chiari syndrome and PVT. SOS, previously known as hepatic veno-occlusive disease, is mainly seen in North America and Western Europe as a complication of the conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. SOS is caused by damage to SECs, and the initiating circulatory blockage occurs because of the embolism of sinusoidal lining cells. Myeloproliferative disorders are an uncommon cause of NRH, which is believed to be caused by uneven perfusion of the liver at the venous or sinusoidal level. Peliosis hepatis is believed to result from damage to SECs and is seen mainly in immunosuppressed patients, patients with a wasting illness, or patients with a drug toxicity.     

Surgical portosystemic shunts in the era of TIPS and liver transplantation are still relevant

BackgroundThe surgical portosystemic shunts (PSS) are a time-proven modality for treating portal hypertension. Recently, in the era of liver transplantation and the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), use of the PSS has declined.ObjectivesThis study was conducted to evaluate changes in practice, referral patterns, and short- and longterm outcomes of the use of the surgical PSS before and after the introduction of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD).MethodsA retrospective analysis of 47 patients undergoing PSS between 1996 and 2011 in a single university hospital was conducted.ResultsSubgroups of patients with cirrhosis (53%), Budd–Chiari syndrome (13%), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (26%), and other pathologies (9%) differed significantly with respect to shunt type, Child–Pugh class, MELD score and perioperative mortality. Perioperative mortality at 60 days was 15%. Five-year survival was 68% (median: 70 months); 5-year shunt patency was 97%. Survival was best in patients with PVT and worst in those with Budd–Chiari syndrome compared to other subgroups. Patency was better in the subgroups of patients with cirrhosis and other pathologies compared with the PVT subgroup. Substantial changes in referral patterns coincided with the adoption of the MELD in 2002, with decreases in the incidence of cirrhosis and variceal bleeding, and increases in non-cirrhotics and hypercoagulopathy.ConclusionsAlthough the spectrum of diseases benefiting from surgical PSS has changed, surgical shunts continue to constitute an important addition to the surgical armamentarium. Selected subgroups with variceal bleeding in well-compensated cirrhosis and PVT benefit from the excellent longterm patency offered by the surgical PSS.     

Update on hepatorenal syndrome

The hepatorenal syndrome is a form of renal failure occurring in patients with advanced liver disease. The diagnosis is based both on the demonstration of low GFR and exclusion of other common causes of renal failure that may occur in patients with cirrhosis. Orthotopic liver transplantation remains the only curative treatment for this poor outcome disease; other modalities such as vasopressin analogues, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or renal replacement therapies may serve as a bridge to transplantation. This article reviews the pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment of hepatorenal syndrome.     

Role of anticoagulant therapy in liver disease

Anticoagulant therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of different liver diseases. In Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), survival rates have increased considerably since the introduction of a treatment strategy in which anticoagulation is the treatment of first choice. In all patients diagnosed with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT), anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 months is indicated. Anticoagulation should also be considered in patients with chronic PVT and a concurrent prothrombotic risk factor. Current evidence suggests that patients with PVT in cirrhosis will benefit from treatment with anticoagulation as well. In severe chronic liver disease the levels of both pro- and anticoagulant factors are decreased, resetting the coagulant balance in an individual patient and making it more prone to deviate to a hypo- or hypercoagulable state. An increased activity of the coagulation cascade is not solely a feature of chronic liver disease; it influences the development of liver fibrosis as well. Several studies in animals and humans have shown that anticoagulation could prevent or improve fibrogenesis and even disease progression in cirrhosis. Anticoagulation is therefore a promising antifibrotic treatment modality.