Understanding Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain Assessment in Dementia: A Literature Review

BackgroundPain is underrecognized and undertreated in patients with dementia. It has been suggested that nurses’ attitudinal barriers may contribute to the challenges surrounding pain assessment and management in dementia.AimsThis integrative literature review aims to identify and explore nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards pain assessment in older people with dementia and how it may affect pain management in this patient group.MethodElectronic searches were conducted in Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, and EBSCOhost from January 2008 to December 2018 for articles specifically focusing on nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards pain assessment in older patients with dementia.ResultsTen studies were included in the review after meeting the inclusion criteria. Data extracted from each study included study design, aims and objectives, setting/sample, findings, and limitations. Patients with dementia are at greater risk of experiencing underassessment, undertreatment, and delayed treatment of pain due to nurses’ knowledge deficits and uncertainty in the decision-making process. Nurses see providing comfort and reducing pain as ethical obligation. However, they find pain assessment a challenge due to the complexity of recognizing painful behaviors, and difficulty differentiating between pain and behavioral disturbances in dementia. Poor multidisciplinary communication, time constraints, and workload pressure, as well as uncertainty about opioid use, are important barriers to effective pain assessment and management among patients with dementia.ConclusionIt is essential that nurses gain confidence in distinguishing signs and symptoms of pain from behavioral changes in dementia. It is important to improve interdisciplinary communication and to get physicians to listen and prioritize pain assessment and management.     

Nurses’ Knowledge about Pain Management with Opioids for Dying Patients United Kingdom Nursing Perspective

ABSTRACT

A discussion is presented on nurses’ knowledge and responsibilities in opioid management of pain in advanced disease patients. Documented deficiencies in some nurses’ knowledge are described. A perspective by a clinical nurse specialist also is presented.     

Adolescent Patients’ Management of Postoperative Pain after Discharge: A Qualitative Study

BackgroundAdolescents are typically admitted for a short period of time after inpatient surgery, leaving much of their recovery to occur at home. Pain, and thus pain management, is a major component of recovery at home. Research among pediatric outpatient surgical patients has found that pain experienced in the community setting after discharge is often severe and is related to knowledge deficits resulting in inadequate pain management. However, there is little research on community pain management after inpatient surgery.AimThis study aimed to explore the pain experiences of seven adolescents who underwent inpatient surgery.DesignThis study used Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis as a methodology.SettingThis study took place at a pediatric tertiary care hospital in Canada.Participants7 adolescents participated, all of whom underwent inpatient surgery with admission between 2-14 days in length.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted 2 to 6 weeks post-discharge.ResultsThree themes were identified that described their experiences, including managing severe pain at home with minimal preparation, changes in the parent–child relationship, and difficulties returning to school and regular activities.ConclusionsInvolving adolescents directly in discharge education, particularly with the use of novel interventions and coaching, may improve outcomes.Key Practice PointsAdolescent patients experience significant pain after discharge from hospital after inpatient surgical procedures. Adolescents are in need of adolescent-specific pain management education to increase skill and knowledge and address pain management-related misconceptions. Greater emphasis on involving adolescents in their own pain care and novel intervention could prove useful in improving outcomes.     

Factors Related to Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain in Hospitals in Low-Income Areas

BackgroundEffective pain management is closely related to nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pain. Limited studies have been performed related to nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain in hospitals in low-income areas.AimsThis study surveyed the knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pain management in county hospitals from low-income areas in Hunan Province, China.Setting and participantsThe study included 4,668 registered nurses working in 48 county hospitals in low-income areas in China.MethodsA cross-sectional study examined the knowledge and attitudes of nurses with regard to pain using the Chinese version of the Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) via the WeChat application.ResultsThe 4,668 registered nurses completed the survey; of these, 43.6% indicated they had never received continuing education for pain. The mean percentage score for KASRP was (40.3 ± 7.95), and none of the respondents achieved a percentage score of >80%. Further, of the 40 items, only two had a correct rate of >80%. Continuing pain education did not significantly affect KASRP. Multiple stepwise linear regression showed that education level, ethnicity, professional title, position, and department were independent influencing factors for KASRP scores.ConclusionAlmost all nurses in county hospitals of low-income areas had deficiencies in various aspects of pain management knowledge. Better educated nurses with higher professional title or management position, those from the Han ethnicity, and those from the oncology department had higher mean KASRP scores. Current continuing education programs for pain did not improve the pain management capability of the nurse. High-quality and standardized pain educational programs should be implemented to improve pain management.     

Pain Management in Patients with Heart Failure: A Survey of Nurses’ Perception

BackgroundOver 50% of patients with heart failure (HF) report suffering from pain and pain-related burdens; however, pain in HF patients has not been recognized or well treated. Few studies have comprehensively examined pain management in patients with HF from nurses’ perception.AimsTo investigate nurses’ perception of pain management in HF patients.MethodsMembers of American Association of Heart Failure Nurses (AAHFN) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional online survey.ResultsA total of 147 nurses responded and completed the survey. The majority agreed that pain in HF patients was related to anxiety, depression, fatigue, and unplanned hospitalization, and that pain should be individually assessed and managed. More than 80% thought pain management practice in HF patients should be improved, and 78.1% were interested in getting more information and believed an online education module was the most preferable approach. Lack of pain assessment tools, drug addiction, side effect, overuse, underuse, and contraindication with other medications were the main concerns regarding opioid use in pain management in HF. The gaps in pain management in HF patients included lack of knowledge of opioid use, lack of consideration and awareness of pain, no clinical guidelines for pain assessment and treatment, and complicated pain management with multiple chronic conditions.ConclusionsThe impact of pain and need for individual assessment and management of pain in HF patients were perceived by nurses; improvement in pain management practice in HF patients is needed. Concerns regarding opioid use and gaps in pain management of HF patients should be addressed.     

Effect of Pain Education Interventions on Registered Nurses’ Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesThis review and meta-analysis aims to reveal how pain education interventions affect registered nurses’ pain management.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysisData sourcesPubMed, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and ERICReview methodsA systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant peer-reviewed English or Finnish-language articles published between 2008 and 2021. The review included a quality appraisal and a meta-analysis of articles providing group-level data before and after the intervention (n = 12). The methods followed the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsOverall, 23 articles met the inclusion criteria for the review, of which 15 were evaluated as good quality. Based on the articles on document audits (n = 10), pain education interventions reduced the risk of not receiving the best pain management by 40%, whereas based on the articles on patients’ experiences (n = 4), they reduced the risk by 25%. The study quality and design of these articles were considerably heterogenous.ConclusionsPain education study strategies varied widely among the included articles. These articles used multivariate interventions without systematization or sufficient opportunity to transfer the study protocols. It can be concluded that versatile pain nursing education interventions, as well as auditing of pain nursing and its documentation combined with feedback, can be effective to nurses in adapting pain management and assessment practices and increasing patient satisfaction. However, further research is required in this regard. In addition, well-designed, implemented, and reproducible evidence-based pain education intervention is required in the future.     

Evaluating Advanced Practice Nurses’ Knowledge and Use of Electronic Consultations

Timely access and appropriate referrals to a specialist are shared problems among primary care providers. Historically, consultations with a specialist have required long waits for patients; often, these referrals result in unnecessary and costly appointments. Recently, primary care providers have begun to use electronic consultation (e-consult) for provider-to-provider consultation. Medicare released Current Procedural Terminology codes in February of 2019 that allow for billing of this type of visit. Little information regarding e-consult was found in the nurse practitioner literature. This pilot study evaluated e-consult knowledge and the use of advanced practice nurses in a state that has robust telehealth policies and reimbursement.     

Medical‐Surgical Patients’ and Registered Nurses’ Satisfaction and Comprehensiveness of Patient Assessment Using the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment Tool

BackgroundThe pain experience is complex, and nurses are challenged to objectively assess and document patients’ subjective reports of pain. There is a clear need for an assessment tool that is easy to use and provides meaningful, actionable information for patients and nurses.AimsThis study explored nurses’ and patients’ satisfaction with the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) as well as nurses’ charting.Setting and ParticipantsA convenience sample of adult patients and nurses on four medical-surgical units in one community hospital.MethodsA quantitative, two-group comparison design between patients and nurses using questionnaires to determine satisfaction and a retrospective chart review to determine comprehensiveness of nurse charting.ResultsNo significant differences existed between patients’ and nurses’ responses to seven of eight satisfaction questions The median score for seven of eight questions was 5 (using a 6-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree), which demonstrated more than 80% agreement (somewhat agree, agree, strongly agree) among both groups that CAPA was superior to the NRS, based on individual responses. The one significant difference (p = 0.03) revealed patients were more likely to respond “agree or strongly agree” compared to nurses regarding the nurse thoroughly addressing patients’ needs using CAPA. Inter-rater reliability using CAPA was determined to be 89.5%, and a panel of clinical experts determined CAPA had strong content validity of 88.33%. In addition, 70.41% of nurses charted comprehensively using CAPA.ConclusionAs a result, CAPA was determined to be convenient, accurate, and valuable in guiding intervention decisions.     

Nurses’ Opinions of Pain and the Assessed Need for Pain Medication for the Elderly

The undertreatment of pain in the elderly living in nursing homes is a significant problem. In Swedish nursing homes, the registered nurse on duty is often responsible for 20-40 patients during the day with no daily contact from attending physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of registered nurses regarding pain and the assessed need for pain medication for elderly patients using patient scenarios. Two patient scenarios were used in this study; a questionnaire and background information was provided. The scenarios consisted of one smiling patient and one grimacing patient, both with the same numeric rating scale value of pain, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiration rate. Three questions regarding pain assessment and management followed the scenarios. The questionnaire was sent to all 128 registered nurses working daytime in elderly care in both municipal nursing homes and municipal home care in the mid-Sweden region. A total of 56 nurses participated, providing an answering frequency of 45%. Results showed that registered nurses with more experience did not have the same opinion about pain as the smiling patient and gave inadequate medication, which was not in accordance with recommendations from the county hospital and the World Health Organization.     

Colorectal Surgery Patients’ Pain Status,Activities, Satisfaction,and Beliefs about Pain and Pain Management

This study describes surgical colorectal cancer patients’ pain levels, recovery activities, beliefs and expectations about pain, and satisfaction with pain management. A convenience sample of 50 adult inpatients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer participated. Patients were administered the modified American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire on postoperative day 2 and asked to report on their status in the preceding 24 hours. Patients reported low current (mean 1.70) and average (mean 2.96) pain scores but had higher scores and greater variation for worst pain (mean 5.48). Worst pain occurred mainly while turning in bed or mobilizing, and 25% of patients experienced their worst pain at rest. Overall, patients expected to have pain after surgery and were very satisfied with pain management. Patients with worst pain scores >7 reported interference with recovery activities, mainly general activity (mean 5.67) and walking ability (mean 5.15). These patients were likely to believe that “people can get addicted to pain medication easily” (mean 3.39 out of 5) and that “pain medication should be saved for cases where pain gets worse” (mean 3.20 out of 5). These beliefs could deter patients from seeking pain relief and may need to be identified and addressed along with expectations about pain in the preoperative nursing assessment.     

Neonatal Nurses’ Perceptions of Pain Management: Survey of the United States and China

Despite growing knowledge, neonatal pain remains unrecognized, undertreated, and generally challenging. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted to investigate neonatal nurses’ perceptions, knowledge, and practice of infant pain in the United States and China, including 343 neonatal nurses (American nurses [n = 237]; Chinese nurses [n = 106]). Nurses’ responses regarding neonatal pain reflected adequate knowledge in general pain concepts, but knowledge deficits related to several topics were found (e.g., preterm infants are more sensitive to pain and long-term consequences of pain). Most reported regular use of pain assessment tools, but fewer agreed that the tool used was appropriate and accurate. More American nurses (83%) than Chinese nurses (58%) felt confident in the use of pain medications, while more Chinese nurses (78%) than American nurses (61%) acknowledged the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions. About half reported that pain in their units was well managed (American: 44.3%; Chinese: 55.7%), and less than half felt that pain guidelines/protocols were research-based (American: 42.6%; Chinese: 34.9%). Nurses’ perceptions of well-managed pain in their units were significantly correlated with adequate education/training, use of accurate tools, and use of research-based protocols. Barriers to effective pain management included resistance to change, lack of knowledge, lack of time, fear of side effects of pain medication, and lack of trust in the tools. The survey reflects concerns that pain has not been well managed in many neonatal intensive care units in the United States and China. Further actions are needed to solve the issues of inadequate training, lack of clinically feasible pain tools, and absence of evidence-based guidelines/protocols.     

Emergency Room Psychiatric Services: A Qualitative Study of Nurses’ Experiences

Emergency nurses working in general emergency divisions (EDs) are primarily trained to assess and treat acute physical problems. However, ED nurses often care for psychiatric patients and the perceptions of nurses in EDs regarding their experiences with psychiatric patients have not been well-studied. Using focus groups, the purpose of this study was to explore and describe ED nurses’ experiences, and feelings caring for patients with mental illness. Krueger and Casey's qualitative analysis for focus groups was utilized to code and categorize phrases and identify themes from transcribed interviews. Four themes emerged; powerlessness best captured the overarching and substantive experience of the participants. Based on the findings, implications for emergency room care of psychiatric patients are described.     

Patients’ Experiences After Attempted Suicide: A Literature Review

The aim of this study has been to synthesize research on suicidal patients’ experiences of the suicide process. A literature search was performed in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO, and the analysis of the 15 articles covered was based on meta-synthesis. Patients experience a wide variety of feelings regarding their situation during the suicide process, and these exist on two levels: they relate to the different aspects of care that the patients receive and the patients’ need to communicate with others and regain hope. The patients in this study described the struggle to maintain hope when life became too difficult and their suffering despite a sense of security, and they sought to achieve emotional balance. A good understanding of how suicidal individuals live with and manage suicidal ideation, while maintaining hope is important for planning effective nursing care. Further research from the patient perspective is needed to further develop psychiatric care for people at risk of suicide.