Donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies detected by Luminex: predictive for short‐term but not long‐term survival after heart transplantation

In heart transplantation, the clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) detected by solid phase assay (SPA), which is more sensitive than the conventional complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, is unclear. The aim was to evaluate SPA performed on pretransplant sera for survival after heart transplantation. Pretransplant sera of 272 heart transplant recipients were screened for anti‐HLA antibodies using CDC and SPA. For determination of pretransplant DSA, a single‐antigen bead assay was performed. The presence of anti‐HLA antibodies was correlated with survival. Secondary outcome parameters were acute cellular rejection, graft coronary vasculopathy and ejection fraction. In Kaplan–Meier analysis, SPA‐screening did not predict survival (P = 0.494), this in contrast to CDC screening (P = 0.002). However, the presence of pretransplant DSA against HLA class I was associated with decreased short‐term survival compared to non‐DSA (P = 0.038). ROC curve analysis showed a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 73% at a cutoff of 2000 MFI. In contrast, the presence of anti‐HLA antibodies had no influence on long‐term survival, rejection incidence, and graft function. Thus, detection of DSA class I in pretransplant serum is a strong predictor of short‐term, but not long‐term survival and may help in the early management of heart transplant patients.     

Clinical Significance of Pretransplant Donor‐Specific Antibodies in the Setting of Negative Cell‐Based Flow Cytometry Crossmatching in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Antibodies to donor‐specific HLA antigens (donor‐specific antibodies [DSA]) detected by single‐antigen bead (SAB) analysis prior to kidney transplant have been associated with inferior graft outcomes. However, studies of pretransplant DSA, specifically in the setting of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) without desensitization therapy, are limited. Six hundred and sixty kidney and kidney–pancreas recipients with a negative pretransplant FCXM from September 2007 to August 2012 without desensitization therapy were analyzed with a median follow‐up of 4.2 years. All patients underwent cell‐based FCXM and SAB analysis on current and historic sera prior to transplantation. One hundred and sixty‐two patients (24.5%) had DSA detected prior to transplant. One‐year acute rejection rates were similar in DSA‐positive versus DSA‐negative patients (15.4% vs. 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.18) and were higher in those with DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) greater than or equal to 3000 in multivariable analysis (p = 0.046). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 and 4 years was lower in the DSA(+) versus the DSA(?) group (p = 0.050 at 3 years) without an impact on 5‐year death‐censored graft survival (89.0% vs. 90.6%, respectively; p = 0.53). Timing (current or historic) of DSA detection did not alter these findings. In conclusion, pretransplant DSA in the setting of a negative FCXM confers minimal immunologic risk in the intermediate term, does not necessitate desensitization therapy and should not represent a barrier to renal transplant.     

Markers of graft microvascular endothelial injury may identify harmful donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies and predict kidney allograft loss

Graft microvasculature is a major target of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) and endothelial damage is direct evidence of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). Using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed the expression of three microvascular endothelial activation markers (fascin, vimentin, and hsp47), suggestive of endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EndMT) in 351 graft biopsies from 248 kidney recipients, with concomitant screening of circulating antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) DSA at the time of the biopsy. The factors associated with EndMT marker expression were DSA and the presence of microvascular inflammation (MI). EndMT expressing grafts had significantly more allograft loss compared to EndMT negative grafts (P < .0001). The expression of EndMT markers positively correlated with anti‐HLA DSA class II mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels and especially identified DQ and DR antibodies as being more closely associated with microvascular injury. Moreover, only DSA linked to positive EndMT score affected allograft survival, regardless of DSA MFI levels or presence of C4d deposition. Thus, EndMT markers could represent a clinically relevant tool for early identification of ongoing endothelial injury, harmful DSA, and patients at high risk for allograft failure.     

Pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies are detrimental to kidney allograft only when persistent after transplantation

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) increase the risk of allograft rejection and graft failure. They may be present before transplant or develop de novo after transplantation. Here, we studied the evolution of preformed DSA and their impact on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Using the Luminex Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the sera on the day of transplantation of 239 patients who received a kidney transplant. Thirty‐seven patients (15.5%) had pre‐existing DSA detected the day of transplantation. After 5 years, the pre‐existing DSA disappeared in 22 patients whereas they persisted in 12. Variables associated with DSA persistence were age <50 years (P = 0.009), a history of previous transplantation (P = 0.039), the presence of class II DSA (P = 0.009), an MFI of preformed DSA >3500 (P < 0.001), and the presence of two or more DSA (P < 0.001). DSA persistence was associated with a higher risk of graft loss and antibody‐mediated rejection. Previously undetected preformed DSA are deleterious to graft survival only when they persist after transplantation.     

High incidence of delayed graft function in HIV‐infected kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected recipients are under continuous research. High incidence of early post‐transplant complications such as acute rejection has been observed. A multicenter study including HIV‐infected patients who underwent KT in Spain, from 2001 to 2011, was performed. The study population included 108 recipients, 36 HIV‐infected, and 72 matched HIV‐negative KT recipients. HIV‐infected recipients developed more delayed graft function (DGF) (52% vs. 21%, P < 0.001). One‐ and 3‐year graft survival was 91.6% and 86.2% in HIV‐infected patients, and 97.1% and 94.7% in HIV‐negative patients (P = 0.052). In two‐variate Cox analysis, HIV infection was not a predictor of graft loss after adjusting for time on dialysis, acute rejection, and DGF. Multivariate analysis for DGF revealed HIV‐positive status as independent risk factor. We analyzed the evolution of immunosuppressive and antiretroviral therapy (ART). In HIV‐infected patients tacrolimus trough levels were very high in the first week and significantly lower in the second week post‐transplant (P = 0.042). Post‐transplant ART was significantly changed: protease inhibitors use decreased (P = 0.034) and integrase inhibitor use increased (P < 0.001). DGF is another frequent early complication in HIV‐infected recipients that can affect graft survival. Strategies to prevent DGF and antiretroviral regimes with less drug interactions could improve outcomes.     

Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors increases risk of de novo donor‐specific antibodies

In kidney transplantation, conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may avoid calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, but its impact on post‐transplant allo‐immunization remains largely unexplored. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the emergence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) in kidney transplant recipients relative to their immunosuppressive therapy. Among 270 recipients without pretransplant immunization who were screened regularly for de novo DSA, 56 were converted to mTOR inhibitors after CNI withdrawal. DSA emergence was increased in patients who were converted to mTOR inhibitors (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.06–5.41, P = 0.036). DSA were mainly directed against donor HLA‐DQB1 antigens. The presence of one or two DQ mismatches was a major risk factor for DQ DSA (HR 5.32; 95% CI 1.58–17.89 and HR 10.43; 95% CI 2.29–47.56, respectively; P < 0.01). Rejection episodes were more likely in patients converted to mTOR inhibitors, but this difference did not reach significance (16% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.185). Concerning graft function, no significant change was observed one year after conversion (P = 0.31). In conclusion, conversion to mTOR inhibitors may increase the risk of developing class II DSA, especially in the presence of DQ mismatches: this strategy may favor chronic antibody‐mediated rejection and thus reduce graft survival.     

Clinical impact of the baseline donor‐specific anti‐human leukocyte antigen antibody measured by Luminex single antigen assay in living donor kidney transplant recipients after desensitization therapy

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical impact of donor‐specific anti‐HLA‐antibody (HLA‐DSA) baseline levels, measured using the Luminex single antigen assay (LSA), in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Total 129 cases of LDKT were divided into four groups according to baseline mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) HLA‐DSA values: Strong (n = 6), >10 000; Moderate (n = 8), 5 000–10 000; Weak (n = 11), 1 000–5 000, Negative (n = 104), <1 000. Pretransplant desensitization (DSZ) was performed to decrease the MFI to weak or negative values before KT. Clinical outcomes in the four groups were compared. After DSZ, HLA‐DSA decreased to weak or negative levels in all patients; Acute rejections developed more frequently in strong group [5/6 (83.3%)] compared with other three groups (P < 0.05), and especially acute antibody‐mediated rejection (AAMR) developed almost exclusively in strong group [4/6 (66.7%)]. Strong HLA‐DSA levels at baseline were more predictive of AAMR than either type of XM (complement‐dependent lymphocytotoxicity or flow cytometry) in ROC analysis. Allograft function in this group showed significant deterioration during follow‐up compared with the other groups. In conclusion, strong HLA‐DSA levels at baseline are associated with worse allograft outcome even after successful desensitization; therefore, strict monitoring and strong maintenance immunosuppression may be required in such patients.     

Clinical relevance of pretransplant anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies: Does C1q-fixation matter?

Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) identified by single antigen bead array (SAB) are questioned for their excess in sensitivity and lack of event prediction after transplantation.Population and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated specific types of preformed DSA (class I, class II or C1q-fixing) and their impact on graft survival. Kidney transplantations performed across negative CDC-crossmatch were included (n = 355). Anti-HLA antibodies were tested using SAB to identify DSA and their capacity to fix C1q.ResultsTwenty-eight patients with pretransplant DSA⁺ with MFI > 2000 were selected to assess C1q fixation. DSA were C1q + in 15 patients and C1q- in 13, without significant differences in demographics, acute rejection, graft loss or renal function. The maximum MFI of DSA in patients with C1q-fixing DSA was significantly higher (p = 0.008). Patients with DSA class-I suffered more antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and had worse graft survival than class-II. The capacity of DSA I to fix C1q did not correlate with rejection, graft function or graft loss.ConclusionsC1q testing in pretransplant sera with DSA was unable to predict acute antibody-mediated rejection or early graft loss, but the presence of DSA class I compared to DSA only class II did. Despite non-fixing complement in vitro, pretransplant C1q-negative DSA I can mediate rejection and graft loss.     

Donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies are not associated with nonanastomotic biliary strictures but both are independent risk factors for graft loss after liver transplantation

Donor‐specific alloantibodies (DSA) have been associated with rejection and shorter graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We examined the role of DSA in nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after OLT. Patients receiving first OLT who developed NAS (n = 68) and a control group without NAS (n = 83), with pre‐OLT and 12 months post‐OLT serum samples, were included. DSA were specified using the Luminex single antigen test. Risk factors for NAS and graft survival were analyzed. The presence of preformed DSA was not significantly different between patients with NAS and controls (P = .89). After 12 months, 26.5% of NAS patients and 16.9% of controls had generated de novo DSA (P = .15). Neither de novo class I DSA nor de novo class II DSA were associated with NAS. De novo DSA generally developed after the diagnosis of NAS. Time‐dependent regression analysis identified both NAS (aHR 8.05, CI 3.28 – 19.77, P < .01) and de novo class II DSA (aHR 2.84, CI 1.38 – 5.82, P < .01) as independent risk factors for graft loss. Preformed or de novo DSA were not associated with the development of NAS. However, NAS as well as de novo class II DSA were independent risk factors for graft loss after OLT.     

Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis

Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.     

Solid phase detection of C4d‐fixing HLA antibodies to predict rejection in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients

Protocols for recipient desensitization may allow for successful kidney transplantation across major immunological barriers. Desensitized recipients, however, still face a considerable risk of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), which underscores the need for risk stratification tools to individually tailor treatment. Here, we investigated whether solid phase detection of complement‐fixing donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) has the potential to improve AMR prediction in high‐risk transplants. The study included 68 sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney allografts who underwent peritransplant immunoadsorption for alloantibody depletion (median cytotoxic panel reactivity: 73%; crossmatch conversion: n = 21). Pre and post‐transplant sera were subjected to detection of DSA‐triggered C4d deposition ([C4d]DSA) applying single‐antigen bead (SAB) technology. While standard crossmatch and [IgG]SAB testing failed to predict outcomes in our desensitized patients, detection of preformed [C4d]DSA (n = 44) was tightly associated with C4d‐positive AMR [36% vs. 8%, P = 0.01; binary logistic regression: odds ratio: 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.6–64.2), P = 0.01]. Moreover, long‐term death‐censored graft survival tended to be worse among [C4d]DSA‐positive recipients (P = 0.07). There were no associations with C4d‐negative AMR or cellular rejection. [C4d]DSA detected 6 months post‐transplantation were not related to clinical outcomes. Our data suggest that pretransplant SAB‐based detection of complement‐fixing DSA may be a valuable tool for risk stratification.     

De novo donor‐specific antibodies in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated kidney‐transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT studies

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with an increased risk of antibody‐mediated rejection and graft failure. In BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT, kidney‐transplant recipients were randomized to receive belatacept more intense (MI)–based, belatacept less intense (LI)–based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression for up to 7 years (84 months). The presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined at baseline, at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84, and at the time of clinically suspected episodes of acute rejection, using solid‐phase flow‐cytometry screening. Samples from anti‐HLA‐positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of DSAs, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. In BENEFIT, de novo DSAs developed in 1.4%, 3.5%, and 12.1% of belatacept MI‐treated, belatacept LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT‐EXT were 3.8%, 1.1%, and 11.2%. Per Kaplan‐Meier analysis, de novo DSA incidence was significantly lower in belatacept‐treated vs cyclosporine‐treated patients over 7 years in both studies (P < .01). In patients who developed de novo DSAs, belatacept‐based immunosuppression was associated with numerically lower MFI vs cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression suppresses de novo DSA development more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.     

Early findings of prospective anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies monitoring study in pancreas transplantation: Indiana University Health Experience

The significance of donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) is not well known in the setting of pancreas transplantation. Since December 2009, we prospectively followed pancreas transplant patients with single‐antigen‐luminex‐bead testing at one, two, three, six, and then every six months for the first two yr. Thirty‐five of the 92 patients that underwent pancreas transplantation (13 pancreas‐alone [PTA], 20 with a kidney [SPK], and two after a kidney [PAK]) agreed to participate in study. Median age at transplant was 45 yr and follow‐up was 23 months. Majority were Caucasian (n = 33) and male (n = 18). Rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin induction was used. Median HLA‐mismatch was 4.2 ± 1.1. Eight patients (7SPK, 1PAK) developed post‐transplant DSA at median follow‐up of 76 d (26–119), 1 SPK had pre‐formed DSA. Seven patients had both class I and class II DSA, one with class I and one with class II only. Mean peak class I DSA‐MFI was 3529 (±1456); class II DSA‐MFI was 5734 (±3204) whereas cumulative DSA MFI (CI + CII) was 9264 (±4233). No difference was observed in the patient and donor demographics among patients with and without DSA. One patient in non‐DSA group developed acute cellular rejection of pancreas. From our data it appears that post‐transplant DSA in pancreas allograft recipients may not impact the early‐pancreatic allograft outcomes. The utility of prospective DSA monitoring in pancreatic transplant patients needs further evaluation and long‐term follow‐up.     

Subclass analysis of donor HLA‐specific IgG in antibody‐incompatible renal transplantation reveals a significant association of IgG4 with rejection and graft failure

Donor HLA‐specific antibodies (DSAs) can cause rejection and graft loss after renal transplantation, but their levels measured by the current assays are not fully predictive of outcomes. We investigated whether IgG subclasses of DSA were associated with early rejection and graft failure. DSA levels were determined pretreatment, at the day of peak pan‐IgG level and at 30 days post‐transplantation in eighty HLA antibody‐incompatible kidney transplant recipients using a modified microbead assay. Pretreatment IgG₄ levels were predictive of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (P = 0.003) in the first 30 days post‐transplant. Pre‐treatment presence of IgG₄ DSA (P = 0.008) and day 30 IgG₃ DSA (P = 0.03) was associated with poor graft survival. Multivariate regression analysis showed that in addition to pan‐IgG levels, total IgG₄ levels were an independent risk factor for early rejection when measured pretreatment, and the presence of pretreatment IgG₄ DSA was also an independent risk factor for graft failure. Pretreatment IgG₄ DSA levels correlated independently with higher risk of early rejection episodes and medium‐term death‐censored graft survival. Thus, pretreatment IgG₄ DSA may be used as a biomarker to predict and risk stratify cases with higher levels of pan‐IgG DSA in HLA antibody‐incompatible transplantation. Further investigations are needed to confirm our results.     

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BackgroundPatients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.MethodsHLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) and Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.ResultsIn this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 100% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% and 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I and II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I and II MFI 5790.26, 6004.16; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I and II MFI 8631.71, 7253.29; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I and HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.     

Pediatric heart transplantation across a positive crossmatch: First year results from the CTOTC‐04 multi‐institutional study

Sensitization is common in pediatric heart transplant candidates and waitlist mortality is high. Transplantation across a positive crossmatch may reduce wait time, but is considered high risk. We prospectively recruited consecutive candidates at eight North American centers. At transplantation, subjects were categorized as nonsensitized or sensitized (presence of ≥1 HLA antibody with MFI ≥1000 using single antigen beads). Sensitized subjects were further classified as complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC‐crossmatch) positive or negative and as donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) positive or negative. Immunosuppression was standardized. CDC‐crossmatch–positive subjects also received perioperative antibody removal, maintenance corticosteroids, and intravenous immunoglobulin. The primary endpoint was the 1 year incidence rate of a composite of death, retransplantation, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. 317 subjects were screened, 290 enrolled and 240 transplanted (51 with pretransplant DSA, 11 with positive CDC‐crossmatch). The incidence rates of the primary endpoint did not differ statistically between groups; nonsensitized 6.7% (CI: 2.7%, 13.3%), sensitized crossmatch positive 18.2% (CI: 2.3%, 51.8%), sensitized crossmatch negative 10.7% (CI: 5.7%, 18.0%), P = .2354. The primary endpoint also did not differ by DSA status. Freedom from antibody‐mediated and cellular rejection was lower in the crossmatch positive group and/or in the presence of DSA. Follow‐up will determine if acceptable outcomes can be achieved long‐term.     

Determining donor‐specific antibody C1q‐binding ability improves the prediction of antibody‐mediated rejection in human leucocyte antigen‐incompatible kidney transplantation

Detrimental impact of preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leucocyte antigens on outcomes after kidney transplantation are well documented, however, the value of their capacity to bind complement for predicting antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) and graft survival still needs to be confirmed. We aimed to study DSA characteristics (strength and C1q binding) that might distinguish harmful DSA from clinically irrelevant ones. We retrospectively studied 60 kidney‐transplanted patients with preformed DSA detected by single antigen bead (SAB) assays (IgG and C1q kits), from a cohort of 517 kidney graft recipients (124 with detectable anti‐HLA antibodies). Patients were divided into DSA strength (MFI < vs. ≥ 15 000) and C1q‐binding ability. AMR frequency was high (30%) and it increased with DSA strength (P = 0.002) and C1q+ DSA (P < 0.001). The performance of DSA C1q‐binding ability as a predictor of AMR was better than DSA strength (diagnostic odds ratio 16.3 vs. 6.4, respectively). Furthermore, a multivariable logistic regression showed that C1q+ DSA was a risk factor for AMR (OR = 16.80, P = 0.001), while high MFI DSAs were not. Graft survival was lower in high MFI C1q+ DSA in comparison with patients with C1q? high or low MFI DSA (at 6 years, 38%, 83% and 80%, respectively; P = 0.001). Both DSA strength and C1q‐binding ability assessment seem valuable for improving pretransplant risk assessment. Since DSA C1q‐binding ability was a better predictor of AMR and correlated with graft survival, C1q‐SAB may be a particularly useful tool.     

The impact of belatacept on third‐party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel‐reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept‐treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept‐treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.     

Clinical impact of preformed donor‐specific denatured class I HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation

Class I single‐antigen flow beads (SAFB) carry native and denatured human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. Using a cohort of 179 class I HLA‐sensitized kidney recipients, we described incidence and clinical relevance of preformed denatured HLA donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) using two different assays: an acid‐treated SAFB assay (anti‐dHLA DSA) and the iBeads assays (SAFB+/iBeads‐ DSA). Eighty‐five class I DSA were found in 67 patients (median mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] of 1729 [range 520–13 882]). Anti‐dHLA and SAFB+/iBeads‐ DSA represented 11% and 18% of class I DSA and were mainly low MFI DSA (500–1000 MFI). Concordance between these two assays was good (90%). None of the patients with only class I anti‐dHLA DSA or only SAFB+/iBeads‐ DSA developed acute clinical antibody‐mediated rejection in the first‐year post‐transplantation, and their five‐yr death‐censored graft survival was similar to that of patients without DSA. Moreover, all these patients displayed a negative current T‐cell flow cytometry cross‐match. Therefore, both anti‐dHLA DSA and SAFB+/iBeads‐ DSA appear irrelevant, which could explain the good outcome observed in some patients with preformed class I DSA.     

Clinical relevance of the de novo production of anti‐HLA antibodies following intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Despite a negative pretransplant cross‐match, intestinal transplant recipients can mount humoral immune responses soon after transplantation. Moreover, the development of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with severe graft injury. Between June 2000 and August 2011, 30 patients (median age 37.6 ± 9.8 years) received isolated intestinal transplantations (ITX, n = 18) or multivisceral transplantations (MVTXs, n = 12) at our center. We screened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies pre‐ and post‐transplant. If patients produced DSAs, treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was initiated. In the event of DSA persistence and/or treatment‐refractory rejection, rituximab and/or bortezomib were added. Ten patients developed DSAs and simultaneously showed significant signs of rejection. These patients received plasmapheresis and IVIG. Eight patients additionally received rituximab, and two patients were treated with bortezomib. DSA values decreased upon antirejection therapy in 8 of the 10 patients. The development of DSAs following ITX is often associated with acute rejection. We observed that the number of mismatched antigens and epitopes correlates with the probability of developing de novo DSAs. Early diagnosis and therapy, including B‐cell depletion and plasma cell inhibition, are crucial to preventing further graft injury.