Long-term effects of PERV-specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs

Semaan M, Kaulitz D, Petersen B, Niemann H, Denner J. Long‐term effects of PERV‐specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation 2012; 19: 112–121. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a risk of xenotransplantation using porcine cells, tissues, or organs, as they are integrated in the porcine genome and have been shown to be able to infect human cells in vitro. To increase viral safety by RNA interference, transgenic pigs expressing a PERV‐specific small hairpin (sh)RNA targeted to a highly conserved sequence in the pol gene (pol2) were generated in which expression of PERVs was reduced (Xenotransplantation, 15, 2008, 38). However, it remains to be shown how long expression of the shRNA and the RNA interference is effective in reducing PERV expression. Methods: To analyze the long‐term duration of RNA interference, expression of the PERV‐specific pol2 shRNA and inhibition of PERV expression was studied repeatedly in fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of transgenic pigs over a period of 3 yr, when animals were sacrificed and expression was studied in different organs. Expression of the PERV‐specific shRNA was measured using a newly developed real‐time PCR, and expression of PERV was measured using a PERV‐specific real‐time PCR. Results: Over a period of 3 yr, PERV‐specific shRNA and green fluorescent protein (GFP) as reporter of the vector system were consistently expressed in transgenic animals. PERV expression was significantly reduced during the entire period. Levels of PERV and shRNA expression were different in the various organs. PERV expression was highest in the spleen and the lungs and lowest in liver and heart. However, in all organs of the transgenic pigs, PERV expression was inhibited compared with the vector control animals. Conclusions: Transgenic pigs expressing PERV‐specific shRNA maintained their specific RNA interference long term, suggesting that PERV expression in the xenotransplants will be suppressed over extended periods of time.     

Knockdown of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) expression by PERV-specific shRNA in transgenic pigs

Abstract: Background: Xenotransplantation using porcine cells, tissues or organs may be associated with the transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). More than 50 viral copies have been identified in the pig genome and three different subtypes of PERV were released from pig cells, two of them were able to infect human cells in vitro. RNA interference is a promising option to inhibit PERV transmission. Methods: We recently selected an efficient si (small interfering) RNA corresponding to a highly conserved region in the PERV DNA, which is able to inhibit expression of all PERV subtypes in PERV‐infected human cells as well as in primary pig cells. Pig fibroblasts were transfected using a lentiviral vector expressing a corresponding sh (short hairpin) RNA and transgenic pigs were produced by somatic nuclear transfer cloning. Integration of the vector was proven by PCR, expression of shRNA and PERV was studied by in‐solution hybridization analysis and real‐time RT PCR, respectively. Results: All seven born piglets had integrated the transgene. Expression of the shRNA was found in all tissues investigated and PERV expression was significantly inhibited when compared with wild‐type control animals. Conclusion: This strategy may lead to animals compatible with PERV safe xenotransplantation.     

Infectious risk in xenotransplantation – what post‐transplant screening for the human recipient?

Xenotransplantation may be associated with the transmission of pig microorganisms including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites. As the recipient may be immunosuppressed, infection and pathologic consequences may be more pronounced compared to non-immunosuppressed individuals. Transmission of most microorganisms with exception of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) may be prevented by screening the donor pig and qualified pathogen-free breeding. PERVs represent a special risk as they are present in the genome of all pigs and infect human cells in vitro. Until now, no PERV transmission was observed in experimental and clinical xenotransplantations as well as in numerous infection experiments. Nevertheless, several strategies have been developed to prevent PERV transmission.     

Is porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission still relevant?

Xenotransplantation using porcine cells or organs may be associated with the risk of transmission of zoonotic microorganisms. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) pose a potentially high risk because they are integrated into the genome of all pigs and PERV-A and PERV-B at least, which are present in all pigs, can infect human cells. However, PERV transmission could not be demonstrated in the first recipients of clinical xenotransplantation or after numerous experimental pig-to-non-human primate transplantations. In addition, inoculation of immunosuppressed small animals and non-human primates failed to result in demonstrable PERV infection. Nevertheless, strategies to reduce the possible danger of PERV transmission to humans, however low, could be of benefit for the large-scale clinical use of porcine xenotransplants. One strategy is to select pigs free of PERV-C, thereby preventing recombination with PERV-A. A second strategy involves the selection of animals that express only very low levels of PERV-A and PERV-B. To this end, sensitive and specific methods have been developed to allow the distribution and expression of PERV to be analyzed. A third strategy is to develop a vaccine capable of protecting against PERV transmission. Finally, a fourth strategy is based on the inhibition of PERV expression by RNA interference. Using PERV-specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and retroviral vectors, inhibition of PERV expression in primary pig cells was demonstrated and transgenic pigs were generated that show reduced PERV expression in all tissues analyzed. Intensive work is required to improve and to combine these strategies to further decrease the putative risk of PERV transmission following xenotransplantation.     

First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes—Chapter 5: recipient monitoring and response plan for preventing disease transmission

Xenotransplantation of porcine cells, tissues, and organs may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms to the human recipient. A previous, 2009, version of this consensus statement focused on strategies to prevent transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). This version addresses potential transmission of all porcine microorganisms including monitoring of the recipient and provides suggested approaches to the monitoring and prevention of disease transmission. Prior analyses assumed that most microorganisms other than the endogenous retroviruses could be eliminated from donor animals under appropriate conditions which have been called “designated pathogen‐free” (DPF) source animal production. PERVs integrated as proviruses in the genome of all pigs cannot be eliminated in that manner and represent a unique risk. Certain microorganisms are by nature difficult to eliminate even under DPF conditions; any such clinically relevant microorganisms should be included in pig screening programs. With the use of porcine islets in clinical trials, special consideration has to be given to the presence of microorganisms in the isolated islet tissue to be used and also to the potential use of encapsulation. It is proposed that microorganisms absent in the donor animals by sensitive microbiological examination do not need to be monitored in the transplant recipient; this will reduce costs and screening requirements. Valid detection assays for donor and manufacturing‐derived microorganisms must be established. Special consideration is needed to preempt potential unknown pathogens which may pose a risk to the recipient. This statement summarizes the main achievements in the field since 2009 and focus on issues and solutions with microorganisms other than PERV.     

Phylogenetic analysis of porcine endogenous retroviruses expressed in Chinese pigs based on envelope sequences

The promise of successful clinical xenotransplantation is now offset by the potential risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV). PERV consists of three subtypes according to the varieties of env sequences. We analyzed PERV subtypes in two species of Chinese pigs (Banna minipig inbred, BMI, and Wu-Zhi-Shan pig, WZSP). Positive A and B were detected while positive C was absent in the analyzed Chinese pigs. The polymerase chain reaction products were then cloned into a pGEM-T vector system and sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were constructed from the translated amino acids of PERVs and other type C and type D retrovirus, as well as the lentivirus in the GeneBank. The results suggested that PERV-A and PERV-B that exist in Chinese pig genomes share similarities with other PERV from the GeneBank and some type C retroviruses, including lymphotropic, leukemic and endogenous retroviruses.     

Pig endogenous retroviruses and xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs might provide an unlimited source of donor organs to treat endstage organ failure diseases in humans. However, pigs harbour retroviruses with unknown pathogenic potential as an integral part of their genome. While until recently the risk of interspecies transmission of these porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) during xenotransplantation has been thought to be negligible, several reports on infection of human cells in vitro and spread of PERV from transplanted porcine islets in murine model systems have somewhat challenged this view. Here, we compile available data on PERV biology and diagnostics, and discuss the significance of the results with regard to the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.     

Sensitive and specific immunological detection methods for porcine endogenous retroviruses applicable to experimental and clinical xenotransplantation

Abstract: The use of organs from transgenic pigs for xenotransplantation may be associated with the risk of transmission of microorganisms, especially when the transgenic pigs express human proteins influencing complement activation. The porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are of particular concern as they can infect human cells in vitro. However, it is unknown whether PERVs can infect transplant recipients in vivo and, if so, whether they are pathogenic. It is therefore essential for experimental and clinical xenotransplantation procedures that specific and sensitive screening methods for PERVs are established. We developed Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA) based on purified PERVs produced by pig and human cells or recombinant viral protein and synthetic peptides corresponding to PERVs' transmembrane envelope protein, respectively. PERV-specific anti-sera generated against purified virus particles, purified viral proteins and synthetic peptides served as positive controls. Both assays were used for screening the sera of healthy blood donors, pregnant women, patients treated with pig tissues, and butchers with extensive contact to living porcine material to detect antibodies against PERV. None of the individuals showed an antibody pattern characteristic for retroviral infections. Some individuals had antibodies reactive against the major capsid protein p27, against smaller viral proteins of the group specific antigen (Gag) in Western blot assays, or against peptides in the ELISA, probably due to cross-reactivity. Here, we present specific and highly sensitive screening methods applicable for future xenotransplantation procedures, but using these methods we found no evidence of PERV-infection among humans potentially at risk.     

Absence of PERV specific humoral immune response in baboons after transplantation of porcine cells or organs

Xenotransplantation of pig organs seems a promising way of overcoming the prevailing limitation on allotransplantation due to donor numbers. However, as porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) can infect human cells in vitro, there is substantial concern regarding the risk of a PERV infection in xenogeneic transplant recipients. Cultured porcine endothelial cells, stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and pancreatic islet cells can release PERV infectious for human cells in vitro, but it is currently unknown whether PERV is released in vivo, whether these viral particles can infect the transplant recipient, and whether they are pathogenic. In a retrospective study 15 immunosuppressed baboons were tested for a specific immune response against PERV after transplantation of porcine endothelial cells, mononuclear blood cells, and lungs. Anti-PERV antibody expression was analyzed with peptide-based, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and highly sensitive Western Blot assays. This xenotransplantation study using nonhuman primates found no evidence of PERV specific humoral immune response. Our data suggest that no productive PERV infection and no continuous PERV release takes place in the nonhuman primates analyzed in this study.     

Review on porcine endogenous retrovirus detection assays—impact on quality and safety of xenotransplants

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs, tissues, and cells inherits a risk for xenozoonotic infections. Viable tissues and cells intended for transplantation have to be considered as potentially contaminated non‐sterile products. The demands on microbial testing, based on the regulatory requirements, are often challenging due to a restricted shelf life or the complexity of the product itself. In Europe, the regulatory framework for xenogeneic cell therapy is based on the advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) regulation (2007), the EMA CHMP Guideline on xenogeneic cell‐based medicinal products (2009), as well as the WHO and Council of Europe recommendations. In the USA, FDA guidance for industry (2003) regulates the use of xenotransplants. To comply with the regulations, validated test methods need to be established that reveal the microbial status of a transplant within its given shelf life, complemented by strictly defined action alert limits and supported by breeding in specific pathogen‐free (SPF) facilities. In this review, we focus on assays for the detection of the porcine endogenous retroviruses PERV‐A/‐B/‐C, which exhibit highly polymorphic proviral loci in pig genomes. PERVs are transmitted vertically and cannot be completely eliminated by breeding or gene knock out technology. PERVs entail a public health concern that will persist even if no evidence of PERV infection of xenotransplant recipients in vivo has been revealed yet. Nevertheless, infectious risks must be minimized by full assessment of pigs as donors by combining different molecular screening assays for sensitive and specific detection as well as a functional analysis of the infectivity of PERV including an adequate monitoring of recipients.     

Xenotransplantation and Hepatitis E virus

Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues and organs may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms to the human recipient. Some of these microorganisms may induce a zoonosis, that is an infectious disease induced by microorganisms transmitted from another species. With exception of the porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs), which are integrated in the genome of all pigs, the transmission of all other microorganisms can be prevented by specified or designated pathogen‐free (spf or dpf, respectively) production of the animals. However, it is becoming clear in the last years that the hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the viruses which are difficult to eliminate. It is important to note that there are differences between HEV of genotypes (gt) 1 and gt2 on one hand and HEV of gt3 and gt4 on the other. HEV gt1 and gt2 are human viruses, and they induce hepatitis and in the worst case fatal infections in pregnant women. In contrast, HEV gt3 and gt4 are viruses of pigs, and they may infect humans, induce commonly only mild diseases, if any, and are harmless for pregnant women. The goal of this review was to evaluate the risk posed by HEV gt3 and gt4 for xenotransplantation and to indicate ways of their elimination from pigs in order to prevent transmission to the human recipient.     

Molecular characterization of the porcine endogenous retrovirus subclass A and B envelope gene from pigs

Xenotransplantation of porcine organs has the potential to overcome the current critical shortage of allogenic organs for transplantation in humans. However, the existence of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) presents a problem for the clinical use of xenografts from pigs. In an attempt to understand the molecular characteristics of PERVs, we cloned the PERV env gene from six pig breeds (ie, Berkshire, Duroc, Landrace, Yorkshire, and two types of miniature pigs) in Korea. A total of 141 env clones were isolated and their sequences were analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses of these genes revealed the presence of PERVs, from both classes A and B, in 54% and 46% of the env clones, respectively. Among these clones, 37 isolates had the correct open reading frame (ORF; 27 clones in subclass A and 10 clones in subclass B), while the others had premature termination. These PERV nucleotide sequences can be used in a database for comparisons of PERV distribution among different pig breeds and for monitoring PERV infection using isolates with functional ORFs. Recombinant envelope of subclass A and B with functional ORF was expressed by vaccinia virus systems. Additionally isolated env clones can be used for various experiments, such as PERV control and infectivity tests, and may enhance the understanding of molecular mechanisms through pseudotyped PERV viruses.     

Virus safety in xenotransplantation: first exploratory in vivo studies in small laboratory animals and non-human primates

For xenotransplantation, the transplantation of animal cells, tissues and organs into human recipients, to date, pigs are favored as potential donors. Beside ethical, immunological, physiological and technical problems, the microbiological safety of the xenograft has to be guaranteed. It will be possible to eliminate all of the known porcine microorgansims in the nearby future by vaccinating or specified pathogen-free breeding. Thus, the main risk will come from the porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) which are present in the pig genome as proviruses of different subtypes. PERVs will therefore be transmitted, with the xenograft, to the human recipient. PERVs can infect numerous different types of human primary cells and cell lines in vitro and were shown to adapt to these cells by serial passaging on uninfected cells. Furthermore, PERVs have high homology to other retroviruses, such as feline leukemia virus (FeLV) or murine leukemia virus (MuLV), which are known to induce tumors or immunodeficiencies in the infected host. To evaluate the potential risk of a trans-species transmission of PERV in vivo, naive and immunosuppressed rats, guinea pigs and minks were inoculated with PERV and screened over a period of 3 months for an antibody reaction against PERV proteins or for the integration of proviral DNA into the genomic DNA of the host's cells. Furthermore, we inoculated three different species of non-human primates, rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta), pig-tailed monkey (Macaca nemestrina) and baboon (Papio hamadryas) with high titers of a human-adapted PERV. To simulate a situation in xenotransplantation, the animals received a daily triple immunosuppression using cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone and RAD, a rapamycin derivative, presently under development by Novartis. None of the small laboratory animals or the non-human primates showed production of antibodies against PERV or evidence of integration of proviral DNA in blood cells or cells of several organs, 3 months after virus inoculation, despite the observation that cells of the animals used in the experiment were infectible in vitro. This apparent difference in the outcome of the in vitro and the in vivo data might be explained by an efficient elimination of the virus by the innate or adaptive immunity of the animals.     

Sequence analysis of proviral DNA of porcine endogenous retroviruses

Among all species analyzed, the domestic pig seems to be the most appropriate organ donor for xenotransplantation. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are present in genomes of all pigs and are capable of infecting human cells in vitro thus posing a serious threat for xenotransplantation procedures. Despite the abundant distribution of PERVs integrated with porcine genome, the majority of PERV proviral DNA is not capable of expressing viral proteins unless seriously mutated. The aim of the study was to analyze PERV genome for mutations. The study was performed on blood samples from 146 pigs. Long-range polymerase chain reaction (Long-PCR) was performed with primer sets designed within long terminal repeats (LTRs). Long-PCR products of different molecular weights were obtained: 530 bp (33.1% of individuals), 580 bp (76.7%), 933 bp (100%), and 2900 bp (59.8%). Amplimers of 7200 bp were absent in 12.8% of individuals, indicating the lack of intact proviral DNA. Sequence analysis showed that most PERV proviral DNA was significantly mutated, thus suggesting the inability to express functional viral RNA; however, it cannot be ruled out that compensatory recombination processes could occur enabling replication of defective proviruses.     

No in vivo infection of triple immunosuppressed non‐human primates after inoculation with high titers of porcine endogenous retroviruses*

Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) released from pig tissue can infect selected human cells in vitro and therefore represent a safety risk for xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs. Although PERVs infect cells of numerous species in vitro, attempts to establish reliable animal models failed until now. Absence of PERV transmission has been shown in first experimental and clinical xenotransplantations; however, these trials suffered from the absence of long‐term exposure (transplant survival) and profound immunosuppression. Methods: We conducted infectivity studies in rhesus monkeys, pig‐tailed monkeys, and baboons under chronic immunosuppression with cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone, and the rapamycin derivative. These species were selected because they are close to the human species and PERVs can be transmitted in vitro to cells of these species. In addition, the animals received twice, a C1 esterase inhibitor to block complement activation before inoculation of PERV. In order to overcome the complications of microchimerism, animals were inoculated with high titers of cell‐free PERV. In addition, to enable transmission via cell–cell contact, some animals also received virus‐producing cells. For inoculation the primate cell‐adapted strain PERV/5° was used which is characterized by a high infectious titer. Produced on human cells, this virus does not express alpha 1,3 Gal epitopes, does not contain porcine antigens on the viral surface and is therefore less immunogenic in non‐human primates compared with pig cell‐derived virus. Finally, we present evidence that PERV/5° productively infects cells from baboons and rhesus monkeys. Results: In a follow‐up period of 11 months, no antibody production against PERV and no integration of proviral DNA in blood cells was observed. Furthermore, no PERV sequences were detected in the DNA of different organs taken after necropsy. Conclusion: These results indicate that in a primate model, in the presence of chronic immunosuppression, neither the inoculation of cell‐free nor cell‐associated PERV using a virus already adapted to primate cells results in an infection; this is despite the fact that peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the same animals are infectible in vitro.     

APOBEC3 proteins and porcine endogenous retroviruses

Xenotransplantation of porcine cells, tissues, and organs offers a solution to overcome the shortage of human donor materials. In addition to the immunological and physiological barriers, the existence of numerous porcine microorganisms including viruses poses a risk for xenozoonosis. Three classes of functional gamma-type porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) have been identified, whereby functional polytropic PERV-A and PERV-B infect human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) and other cell lines in vitro. In the course of risk assessment for xenotransplantation the capacity of human cells to counteract PERV infections should be analyzed. Primates and other mammals display different means of protection against viral infections. APOBEC3 proteins which are cytidine deaminases and a part of the intrinsic immunity mediate potent activity against a wide range of retroviruses including murine leukemia viruses (MLV). As PERV and MLV belong to the same genus, we raised the question as to whether PERV is affected by APOBEC3 proteins. Initial data indicate that human and porcine cytidine deaminases inhibit PERV replication, thereby possibly reducing the risk for infection of human cells by PERV as a consequence of pig-to-human xenotransplantation.     

Emerging infectious diseases and xenotransplantation

A total of 335 infectious diseases was reported in the global human population between 1940 and 2004, the majority of which were caused by zoonotic pathogens [ 1 ]. Although viral pathogens constitute only 25%, some have spread worldwide with most starting from Central Africa. These include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causing acquired immunodeficiency syndromes (AIDS), chikungunya virus and West Nile virus, which also cause severe diseases in humans. HIV‐1 and HIV‐2, for example, are the result of trans‐species transmission from non‐human primates [ 2 ] to humans sometime in the last century. The spread of two henipaviruses causing fatal diseases in horses, pigs and humans has been observed in Asia and Australia, and although these viruses represent transspecies transmissions from bats, secondary transmissions from pigs to humans have also occurred. These and many other examples of emerging infectious diseases call for strong safety considerations in the field of xenotransplantation. Whereas known viruses can easily be eliminated from donor pigs, strategies should be developed to detect new zoonotic pathogens. In addition, all pigs carry porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) in their genome. Two of these, PERV‐A and PERV‐B, as wells as recombinant PERV‐A/C are able to infect human cells. The greatest threat appears to come from the recombinant PERV‐A/C viruses as they appear to have an increased infectivity [ 3 , 4 ]. An increase in PERV expression was not observed in multitransgenic pigs expressing DAF, TRAIL and HLAE, generated to prevent immune rejection [ 5 ]. Our laboratory has developed a variety of strategies to prevent PERV transmission following xenotransplantation: (i) selection of animals that do not harbour PERV‐C genomes in order to prevent recombination, (ii) selection of PERV‐A and PERV‐B low‐producers [ 6 ], (iii) development of an antiviral vaccine to protect xenotransplant recipients [ 7 ] and (iv) generation of transgenic pigs in which PERV expression is inhibited via RNA interference. Inhibition of PERV expression using either synthetic small interfering (si) RNA or short hairpin (sh) RNA was demonstrated in PERV infected human cells [ 8 ], in primary pig cells [ 9 ] and in all transgenic piglets born [ 10 ]. A second generation of pigs expressing PERV‐specific siRNA is now under study and experiments have been started to introduce multiple shRNA. Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, DE729/4.     

Virus and host factors in pathogenesis

Zoonoses pose a threat to mammalian species. Cross‐species transmission of viruses have given rise to fatal diseases because the host organism is not prepared to resist a new pathogen. Mammals have developed several strategies of defense against viruses, including an intracellular antiretroviral defense, a part of innate immunity. In addition to the conventional innate and acquired immune responses, complex organisms such as mice and primates have evolved an array of dominant, constitutively expressed genes that suppress or prevent retroviral infections. Several of these antiretroviral restriction mechanisms have recently been identified, with two particularly well described factors being members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and APOBEC families. The TRIM5 class of inhibitors appears to target incoming retroviral capsids and the APOBEC class of cytidine deaminases hypermutates and destabilizes retroviral genomes. Lentiviruses such as HIV‐1 have developed countermeasures that allow them to replicate despite the human host factors. In the course of risk assessment for pig‐to‐human xenotransplantation the capacity of human cells to counteract infections of gamma‐type porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) should be analyzed. We raised the question as to whether PERV is affected by APOBEC3 proteins. Initial data indicate that human and porcine cytidine deaminases inhibit PERV replication, thereby possibly reducing the risk for infection of human cells by PERV as a consequence of pig‐to‐human xenotransplantation. The exact mechanism of the TRIM5 mediated restriction has not been clarified up to now. At current, we investigate how many TRIM5 genes are located in the pig genome. Furthermore, the properties of porcine TRIM5α isoform proteins will be tested and we will check the potential of the human TRIM5α to restrict PERVs in order to determine the risk of virus transmission.