Survey of radiographic practices for periodontal disease in UK and Irish dental teaching hospitals

OBJECTIVES: To assess current radiographic practices in dental teaching hospitals for the management of patients with periodontal diseases. METHODS: All 17 dental teaching hospitals in UK and Ireland were sent a questionnaire on radiographic equipment and radiograph selection currently used for assessment of patients with destructive periodontal diseases. Opinions were recorded for advantages and disadvantages of the most frequently used radiographic views. RESULTS: A 100% response rate was achieved. All hospitals used panoramic and specific periapical radiographs as one of their radiographic regimes for patients with periodontal disease. Fifty-three per cent of respondents most frequently took panoramic and selected periapical radiographs. Twenty-four per cent took full mouth periapical radiographs (FMPAs) most frequently and 18% took a panoramic radiograph alone. Twenty-four per cent of hospitals operated a protocol for selection of radiographs for periodontal patients. CONCLUSIONS: The most commonly used views taken to assess periodontal status are panoramic radiographs with selected periapicals. Few hospitals operate a protocol for prescribing radiographs.     

Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if digital compensation for exponential attenuation and the characteristics of the human visual system improves the diagnosis of approximal caries from digital radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty premolar teeth were mounted in plaster blocks. Radiographs of the teeth were exposed with the Dixi digital intraoral system employing a Prostyle Intra dental X-ray unit (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Thirteen radiographs were then processed to compensate for the exponential attenuation and for the characteristic of the human visual system using equations presented in the paper. Ten observers were asked to diagnose approximal caries in all radiographs. ROC analyses were performed. The teeth were subsequently sectioned for histological validation of the lesions. The areas under ROC curves of original and processed radiographs were compared and analysed using Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test. RESULTS: There were significant diagnostic differences between the two types of radiographs (all lesions P=0.005. enamel P=0.028, and dentine P=0.050). CONCLUSION: Digital radiographs processed to compensate for exponential attenuation and the characteristics of the human visual system significantly improves the diagnosis of approximal caries in vitro.     

Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography

Objective

To compare proximal caries detection using intraoral bitewing, extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.

Methods

80 extracted human premolar and molar teeth with and without proximal caries were used. Intraoral radiographs were taken with Kodak Insight film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) using the bitewing technique. Extraoral bitewing and panoramic images were obtained using a Planmeca Promax Digital Panoramic X-ray unit (Planmeca Inc., Helsinki, Finland). Images were evaluated by three observers twice. In total, 160 proximal surfaces were assessed. Intra- and interobserver kappa coefficients were calculated. Scores obtained from the three techniques were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Az values for each image type, observer and reading were compared using z-tests, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results

Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.883 to 0.963 for the intraoral bitewing, from 0.715 to 0.893 for the extraoral bitewing, and from 0.659 to 0.884 for the panoramic radiography. Interobserver agreements for the first and second readings for the intraoral bitewing images were between 0.717 and 0.780, the extraoral bitewing readings were between 0.569 and 0.707, and the panoramic images were between 0.477 and 0.740. The Az values for both readings of all three observers were highest for the intraoral bitewing. Az values for the extraoral bitewing images were higher than those of the panoramic images without statistical significance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Intraoral bitewing radiography was superior to extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography in diagnosing proximal caries of premolar and molar teeth ex vivo. Similar intra- and interobserver coefficients were calculated for extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.     

Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries detection from digitized film images captured by a digital camera at different resolution settings. METHODS: Twenty-five periapical radiographs of 50 premolar and 25 molar teeth were photographed using a digital camera, Sony Cyber-shot, DSC-S75 at three different resolution settings: 640 x 480, 1280 x 960 and 1600 x 1200. Seventy-five digital images were transferred to a computer, saved and opened using ACDSee software. In addition, a PowerPoint slide was made from each digital image. Five observers scored three groups of images (the films, the displayed 1:1 digital images on the ACDSee software, and the PowerPoint slides) for the existence of proximal caries using a 5-point confidence scale, and the depth of caries on a 4-point scale. Ground sections of the teeth were used as the gold standard. Az values under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of each group of images and at different resolutions were compared using the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Mean different values between the lesions' depth interpreted by the observers and that of the gold standard were analysed. RESULTS: Films showed the highest Az values. Only the 1280 x 960 images on the ACDSee software showed no significant difference of the Az value from the films (P=0.28). The digital images from three resolution settings on the PowerPoint slides showed no significant differences, either among each other or between them and the films. For caries depth, the 1280 x 960 images showed lower values of mean difference in enamel lesions compared with the other two resolution groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that in order to digitize conventional films, it was not necessary to use the highest camera resolution setting to achieve high diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries detection. The 1280 x 960 resolution setting of the digital camera demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy with film and was adequate for digitizing radiographs for caries detection.     

Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of conventional tomography for proximal caries detection compared with conventional bitewing and digital intraoral radiography. METHODS: In this study, 48 extracted human posterior permanent teeth were used. Conventional bitewing radiographs, digital intraoral radiographs and conventional tomograms were obtained of the teeth. The presence or absence of caries was scored according to a five-point scale by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. True caries depth was determined by histological examination. The diagnostic accuracy of each radiographic system was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The mean of areas under the ROC curve (A(z)) was analysed by pairwise comparison of ROC curve. The interobserver agreement was evaluated using a t-test. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of A(z) scores has shown no significant difference for three imaging modalities (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between interobserver agreement (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of conventional tomograms is comparable to that of conventional bitewing and digital intraoral radiographs for proximal caries detection.     

Individualized periapical radiography determined by clinical and panoramic examination.

The efficiency of panoramic radiography compared with full-mouth periapical examination is an unresolved problem. The diagnostic yield of periapical lesions when the clinical signs and symptoms and the findings from a panoramic radiograph served as the basis for an individualized periapical radiographic examination was studied. Two hundred patients were examined clinically and radiographically. The periapical status was assessed step by step with access to increasing numbers of radiographs. For the clinical examination, the sensitivity was 0.24, the positive predictive value 0.62, the specificity 0.98, the negative predictive value 0.90 and the likelihood ratio for the positive test result 12. For radiographs indicated by the clinical examination plus the panoramic radiograph and selected periapical radiographs, both the sensitivity and the positive predictive value were 0.91, the specificity and the negative predictive value 0.99 each and the likelihood ratio was 91. False findings were twice as frequent in the upper as in the lower arch and particularly found in the incisor and premolar regions. In 30% of the patients no periapical radiograph was needed to supplement the panoramic radiograph. In the other patients, two supplementary periapical radiographs were needed on average. We conclude that the information obtained from the clinical and panoramic examinations supplemented with no more than two periapical radiographs will result in a high diagnostic yield on the periapical status.     

Measurements of tooth length in panoramic radiographs. 1. The use of indicators.

The aim of this study was to investigate both the actual and the radiographic tooth lengths of the maxillary first molar and second premolar and the mandibular premolars in panoramic radiographs. The actual length of 64 extracted teeth was measured. Steel balls were then attached to the cusp and apex and the teeth embedded in plastic moulds. Each pair of plaster casts with their set of teeth was radiographed with an Orthopantomograph twice at an interval of 1 month. The actual and the radiographic tooth length was measured twice by one observer. The mean tooth length of the molar was shorter than that of the premolars. The mean difference between the repeated measurements of the actual tooth length was small and ranged between 0.47 and 1.16% of the tooth length. The mean difference between repeated measurements of the radiographic tooth length was also small, with a method error of 0.13-0.21 mm. The vertical magnification in panoramic radiography was lower for mandibular premolars (13-15%) than for the maxillary second premolar and first molar (17-28%). The palatal root of the maxillary first molar had the highest vertical magnification (28%). Following the second set of radiographs, the mean difference between the measurements was small, except for the palatal root of the maxillary first molar (P < 0.001). Radiographic measurements of this root should therefore be used with caution. The results for the other roots examined indicate that these could be measured with high reproducibility.     

Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars

OBJECTIVES: To assess narrowing of the inferior dental canal in the lower third molar regions using computed tomography (CT) and to determine the value of radiographic markers on rotational panoramic radiographs in assessing the true relationships of the inferior dental canal. METHODS: Patients referred for CT assessment of impacted lower third molars were used in this study. The lower third molars were assessed using CT to determine the position and morphology of the inferior dental canal relative to the roots and the cortical plates. The radiographic markers on rotational panoramic radiographs were correlated with the CT findings when rotational panoramic radiographs were available. RESULTS: The patients referred had 202 lower third molars. Inferior positioning of the inferior dental canal was the most common location on CT. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal was found in relation to the lower third molars in 66.8% of cases. The chance of narrowing of the inferior dental canal as shown using CT increased when at least one of the radiographic markers, superimposition, narrowing, deviation or reduction in density was present on the rotational panoramic radiograph. Deviation of the inferior dental canal on rotational panoramic radiographs was found to be the most significant predictor of narrowing of the inferior dental canal and a close relationship to the roots, as shown in CT. CONCLUSIONS: Narrowing of the inferior dental canal is a common finding when impacted lower third molars are assessed using CT. On rotational panoramic radiographs deviation of the inferior dental canal is the best predictor of narrowing of the inferior dental canal and a close relationship to the roots.     

A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.

The detection of proximal surface caries by the visual interpretation of bitewing radiographs is known to be relatively inaccurate. The present study was designed to examine whether computer image processing could improve the diagnostic accuracy. A computer-aided, software-driven, TV-based system was used to digitize conventional radiographs and digitally process the images using histogram equalization and grey-scale inversion to enhance the images. The computer-enhanced images were compared with conventional intra-oral radiographs for the detection of proximal surface caries using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The results indicate that the digital image processing techniques used did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of dental radiographs. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy could be detected between the non-enhanced digital images and conventional film-based images for the detection of proximal surface caries.     

Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effect of automatic exposure compensation (AEC) on the diagnostic accuracy of proximal caries by comparing several digital intraoral imaging systems with a film. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven extracted teeth served as proximal caries samples. Three digital radiographic systems; the Compuray, the Dixel, and the Sens-A-Ray without scintillator layer, and Kodak Ekta-speed Plus films were used as recording media. Radiographs of the teeth samples were obtained with each recording medium under seven to eight different exposures including the optimum level. Six oral radiologists evaluated the possibility of proximal caries with the five-grade-confidence-scale. On digital radiographs, image manipulations were allowed after the initial assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained at each exposure in each recording medium. The area under the ROC curve (Az) was used as the representative value of diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy (DA) curves were obtained by plotting averaged Az values from all observers as a function of incident exposure in each system. RESULTS: The effect of exposure variation on the DA was slight in the film while it was significantly larger in the digital systems without AEC. Among digital systems, the effect of exposure variation was smaller in the system with AEC than those without AEC. There was no significant effect on the diagnostic accuracy even if digital image manipulation was employed. CONCLUSION: AEC minimizes the decrease of DA due to inadequate exposures. Since it compensates for the narrow exposure range in the digital intraoral sensor systems, the system with AEC may be preferable for the clinical diagnostic tasks.     

An assessment of the aggressive potential of radiolucencies related to the mandibular molar teeth

AIM: The purpose of this study was to outline the radiographic appearance of radiolucent lesions related to the molar teeth and to determine which features indicate aggressive lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Panoramic radiographs were reviewed in 66 patients with radiolucencies related to the molar teeth. The radiographic appearances of the lesions were assessed with regard to location and size, and the relationship to the molar teeth. Radiographic evidence of aggression was assessed and pathology reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had aggressive and 47 had non-aggressive radiolucent lesions. The aggressive lesions included keratocysts, unicystic ameloblastoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, giant cell granuloma, myxofibroma, chondroblastic osteosarcoma, mestastases and squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue invading the mandible. CONCLUSION: The differential diagnosis of radiolucent lesions in the mandible can be difficult using panoramic radiographs alone. Helpful features in determining aggression were older patients, larger lesions, Lodwick type IC tumour border, condition of the mandibular cortex, movement of adjacent teeth and the relationship of the inferior alveolar canal.     

Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study

Objectives

The diagnosis of caries lesions is still a matter of concern in dentistry. The diagnosis of dental caries by digital radiography has a number of advantages over conventional radiography; however, this method has not been explored fully in the field of paediatric dentistry. This in vitro research evaluated the accuracy of direct digital radiography compared with visual inspection and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars.

Methods

50 molars were selected and evaluated under standardized conditions by 2 previously calibrated examiners according to 3 diagnostic methods (visual inspection, conventional radiography and direct digital radiography). Direct digital radiographs were obtained with the Dixi3 system (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and the conventional radiographs with InSight film (Kodak Eastman Co., Rochester, NY). The images were scored and a reference standard was obtained histologically. The interexaminer reliability was calculated using Cohen''s kappa test and the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of the methods were calculated.

Results

Examiner reliability was good. For lesions limited to the enamel, visual inspection showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than both radiographic methods, but no significant difference was found in specificity. For teeth with dentinal caries, no significant differences were found for any parameter when comparing visual and radiographic evaluation.

Conclusions

Although less accurate than the visual method for detecting caries lesions confined to the enamel, the direct digital radiographic method is as effective as conventional radiographic examination and visual inspection of primary teeth with occlusal caries when the dentine is involved.     

Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for determining (1) the position and morphology of mandibular third molars before surgical removal and (2) the prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-eight third mandibular molars were available for examination. Position and morphology of third molars observed on film radiographs and on digital panoramic images from five systems (DenOptix, DigiDent, Digora, Dimax2 and Orthophos Plus) were recorded by two observers and were compared with surgeons' findings at the time of the operation (gold standard). One observer further recorded the prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies on both imaging modalities. RESULTS: Few differences were found between the digital and film-based panoramic systems in the assessment of accuracy of position and morphology of mandibular third molars. The prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies determined with the two modalities was roughly similar. CONCLUSION: The five digital panoramic systems evaluated in this study were equally as useful for third molar treatment planning and diagnosis of dental anomalies and pathologies as conventional film-based panoramic radiographs.     

Marginal bone in periodontal disease: an evaluation of image quality in panoramic and intra-oral radiography

Five observers assessed the panoramic and full-mouth (14 periapical and four posterior bitewing) radiographs of 20 patients each for the ability to interpret and measure the marginal bone level. The image quality of each site was classified as excellent, acceptable or unacceptable. Depiction errors affecting interpretability and measurability were also noted. In the upper arch, the frequency of uninterpretable and non-measurable sites was almost equal for panoramic and periapical radiography. Image quality was better with periapical radiography in the lower arch. In the posterior regions of both arches, more sites could not be measured from panoramic compared with bitewing radiographs. Due to overlapping the distal surface of the maxillary canine and the mesial surface of the first maxillary premolar could often not be interpreted in either panoramic or periapical radiographs, but infrequently in the bitewings. In the lower arch, the most frequent depiction error was inadequate density in the incisor region of panoramic radiographs. On the basis of these results, we proposed that in clinical practice the panoramic radiograph can be supplemented with individually selected periapicals. In epidemiological studies, the panoramic radiograph should be combined with a premolar bitewing radiograph.     

Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis using different X-ray generators

Dental X-ray machines utilizing five different combinations of X-ray generators and tube voltages (Philips Oralix 65 kV, Siemens Heliodent EC 60 kV, Siemens Heliodent 70 kV, Soredex Minray DC 60 kV and Soredex Minray DC 70 kV) were compared with respect to the accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of proximal caries. Nine observers diagnosed proximal caries in radiographs of extracted premolars. The findings of the observers were compared to the actual presence or absence of caries. The ROC-curve technique was used to evaluate differences in diagnostic accuracy between the X-ray machines. The results showed small differences in diagnostic accuracy between the different X-ray generators but they proved to be statistically non-significant.     

Human dental age estimation combining third molar(s) development and tooth morphological age predictors

In the subadult age group, third molar development, as well as age-related morphological tooth information can be observed on panoramic radiographs. The aim of present study was to combine, in subadults, panoramic radiographic data based on developmental stages of third molar(s) and morphological measurements from permanent teeth, in order to evaluate its added age-predicting performances. In the age range between 15 and 23?years, 25 gender-specific radiographs were collected within each age category of 1?year. Third molar development was classified and registered according the 10-point staging and scoring technique proposed by Gleiser and Hunt (1955), modified by K?hler (1994). The Kvaal (1995) measuring technique was applied on the indicated teeth from the individuals’ left side. Linear regression models with age as response and third molar-scored stages as explanatory variables were developed, and morphological measurements from permanent teeth were added. From the models, determination coefficients (R ²) and root-mean-square errors (RMSE) were calculated. Maximal-added age information was reported as a 6?% R2 increase and a 0.10-year decrease of RMSE. Forensic dental age estimations on panoramic radiographic data in the subadult group (15–23?year) should only be based on third molar development.     

Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dental students using bitewing radiographs for the diagnosis of dentinal caries with that of general dental practitioners and to establish a bench mark for testing for improvement in diagnostic performance. METHODS: Fourth year dental students (n=259) viewed bitewing radiographs of 105 proximal tooth surfaces. According to a micro-radiography "gold standard" 45 surfaces had dentine caries. The students were asked to diagnose presence and absence of dentine caries from which, under supervision, they calculated their sensitivity (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR). The students binary diagnostic data was compared with the historical data from a random sample of Dutch dentists (n=273). The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve method was used to analyse the data. The two groups were tested for differences in (a) diagnostic odds ratio and (b) the area under the SROC curve. RESULTS: The students mean TPR for dentine caries diagnosis was 67.2% (s.d. 11.8%) and the FPR was 8.3% (s.d. 8.4%). The corresponding values for dentists were: TPR 54.0% (s.d. 14.1%) and FPR 3.1% (s.d. 4.5%). Significantly more dentists (85%) than students (72%, P<0.001) had a diagnostic odds ratio > or =21. The area under the SROC curve (Az) was 0.8194 for students and 0.8140 for dentists (P=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: In our study (i) the students had a higher TPR but also a higher FPR than the dental practitioners, (ii) their overall performance (Az) was similar but (iii) for a clinically relevant population the dental practitioners would out-perform the students in diagnostic performance.     

Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the Orthophos DS digital panoramic system (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) for the detection of dento-alveolar disease in comparison with film. METHODS: Five patients selected for admission to the School of Dentistry had a panoramic radiograph obtained with the Orthophos Plus (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) system, a digital panoramic image obtained with the Orthophos DS (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) system and a full mouth series. The ground truth was determined from the full mouth series by a panel of board certified oral and maxillofacial radiologists using the Delphi method. Four observers scored both the film and digital panoramic images for the presence of caries and marginal periodontitis. Results were statistically analysed using ROC analysis and ANOVA. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (P=0.704) between the two modalities for the detection of caries but there was a significant difference (P=0.015) for the detection of periodontal disease where conventional panoramic film performed better than the digital image. CONCLUSIONS: Though the conventional film was better than the digital image for the detection of periodontal disease, further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of this result in relation to the potential advantages of digital technology.     

Influence of film fog on radiographic caries diagnosis

Increasing film speed may potentially jeopardize diagnostic quality because of a more rapid build up of fog and an ensuing decrease in image contrast. A standardized amount of fog was simulated by pre-exposing E-speed dental films before use to obtain images of extracted teeth with and without approximal caries. Three experiments were performed. In the first, no effort was made to compensate for the increased density caused by fog. In the other two, density was kept constant by reducing exposure and developing time respectively. Nine dentists recorded the presence and absence of caries using a rating scale to indicate diagnostic confidence. As a measure of diagnostic accuracy, the area under the binormal ROC curve was used and the values averaged across observers. The results showed that fog, up to a level of base plus fog of 0.6 optical density units, had no influence on the diagnostic accuracy in the absence of any compensation. When exposure was lowered to compensate for the increased density, significantly lower diagnostic accuracy was found. On the other hand, when developing time was decreased, no significant difference was found. Observers ranked radiographs with higher levels of fog as being of lower quality. However, no significant correlation was found between subjective ranking of image quality and diagnostic accuracy obtained from the same radiographs. It is concluded that relatively high levels of fog do not exert a negative influence on approximal caries diagnosis and no attempt should therefore be made to compensate for the increased density.