A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement

Summary Two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) systems—the Hologic QDR-1000 and the Norland XR-26 bone densitometers—were evaluated in terms of precision, accuracy, linearity of response, X-ray exposure, and correlation of in vivo spinal measurements. In vitro precision and accuracy studies were performed using the Hologic anthropomorphic spine phantom; linearity of response was determined with increasing thicknesses of aluminum slabs and concentrations of Tums E-X in a constant-level water bath. Both systems were comparable in precision, achieving coefficients of variation (CVs) of less than 1% in bone mineral content (BMC, g), bone area (cm²), and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm²). Both were accurate in their determination of BMC, bone area, and BMD with reference to the Hologic spine phantom. Both systems also showed good BMC and BMD linearity of response. Measured X-ray skin surface exposures for the Hologic and the Norland systems were 3.11 and 3.02 mR, respectively. In vivo spinal measurements (n=65) on the systems were highly correlated (BMC: r=0.993, SEE=1.770 g; area: r=0.984, SEE=1.713 cm²; BMD: r=0.990, SEE=0.028 g/cm²). In conclusion, both systems are comparable in terms of precision, accuracy, linearity of response, and exposure efficiency.     

关于Ward’s三角区的探讨

目的研究Ward＇s三角区骨密度值的临床意义。方法采用美国Hologic Delphi A双能X线骨密度仪测定385名20～80岁志愿者（男230例，女155例）左股骨骨密度及113例左右股骨骨密度．观察Ward＇s三角区的变化规律及临床特点。结果①有40．4％～55．8％的青年人Ward＇s三角区的具体位置计算机很难确定，Ward＇s三角区大部分与解剖部位不相对应；②由计算机自动定位的Ward＇s三角区小方块位置取样误差比较大；③Ward＇s三角区骨密度值的精确度误差和变异系数百分比最大；④腿的位置旋转过度或旋转不足都能引起骨密度的变化；⑤正常人双腿骨密度值无显著性差异。结论Ward＇s三角区骨密度值不能用于诊断或随访。     

A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip

Summary Dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) is currently the most widely used method for noninvasive bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the axial skeleton. Dual energy X-ray absorptimetry (DEXA) is a recently developed technique that uses an X-ray tube as a photon source; it has demonstrated several significant advantages over DPA in preliminary studies. We report here a quantitative comparison of the DEXA and DPA technologies using a Hologic DEXA (Hologic QDR model 1000, Waltham, MA) scanner and a Lunar DPA (Lunar Radiation DP3, gandolineum-153 source) scanner at both the proximal femur and lumbar spine sites using bone density measurements from a populationbased sample of older white men and women who had complete DEXA and DPA measurements of the hip (n=217) or the spine (n=176). To examine the relationship of BMD measured by the DPA scanner to BMD measured on the DEXA scanner, normal least squares linear regression was used to regress the DPA BMD on the DEXA BMD for each site. DEXA values were consistently lower than DPA values, with an average difference of 16%. The squared multiple correlation (R²) values were at or above 0.95 for almost all sites, with Ward's triangle having the lowest value (0.89). The slope for all sites was similar, ranging from 0.94 to 1.1. Research and clinical centers that wish to change to DEXA technology because of its shorter examination time and greater precision can therefore compare DEXA with DPA values using representative convesion factors.     

Bone mass measurements in the distal forearm using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and gamma-ray computed tomography: a longitudinal, in vivo comparative study.

Indices of bone mass were measured in 23 volunteers weekly over 14-16 weeks using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and special-purpose computed tomography (gamma-CT). In vitro, the precision for both systems was excellent (coefficient of variation less than 0.5%). Over 4 months, the precision in vivo (average CV for all subjects) for DEXA measures (BMD, g/cm2, and BMC, g/cm) varied between 0.6 and 1.1%; with gamma-CT it varied from 1.1% for TBD (g/cm3) to 2.2% for CBD (g/cm3). Correlation between the indices of bone mass measured using DEXA and gamma-CT at the ultradistal site was moderate, but these indices were not correlated at the distal third site. When BMD and BMC were derived from the CT index IBD, however, the correlation between these gamma-CT indices and the corresponding DEXA indices was high for both ultradistal and proximal radial sites.     

体重、身高对成都地区青壮年腰椎、髋部骨量的影响

目的　研究体重、身高对青壮年腰椎、髋部骨量的影响。方法　随机抽取成都地区年龄在 2 0～ 39岁 ,排除心肝肺肾、内分泌等慢性病、骨代谢疾病及脊椎畸形者 2 37名 (其中男性 10 8名 ,女性 12 9名 ) ,采用美国Lunar公司生产DPX L型双能X线骨密度仪测定受试者腰椎和髋部的骨矿含量 (BMC)、面积 (AREA)、骨密度 (BMD)。全部资料输入微机 ,用SPSS软件进行统计学处理。结果　体重、身高、体重指数 (BMI)与腰椎、髋部的BMC、Area、BMD呈正相关 ,其中体重与腰椎、髋部的BMC、Area中等程度相关 (r=0 39～ 0 5 5 ,P <0 0 1) ,身高与腰椎 (L2 - 4)AREA相关性最好 (r=0 75 8,P <0 0 1) ,体重、身高与BMD相关性差 (r=0 15 2～ 0 2 2 5 ,P <0 0 5 )。男性腰椎及髋部的BMC、AREA均明显高于同年龄组女性 (P <0 0 1) ,男、女L2 - 4BMD无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ,男性略低于女性。L2 - 4BMC与体重比值及L2 - 4AREA与体重比值 ,男、女无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 )。L2 - 4Area与身高比值男性明显高于女性 (P <0 0 1)。结论　体重对青壮年BMC的影响大于身高 ,身高对L2 - 4AREA影响最大 ,男、女体重、身高的差异决定了峰值骨量的差异。BMC、Area、BMD 3项指标中 ,BMC更能反映体重、身高的差异 ,用BMC诊断骨质疏松     

Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers

The performance of the Hologic QDR-2000 DXA osteodensitometer was critically evaluated at four centers, using at all four centers one bone equivalent humanoid spine phantom supplied by the manufacturer. Results were compared with results from Hologic QDR-1000/W using that phantom tested at the same centers.

It appears that the concept of fan-beam scanning—as used in the QDR-2000: a fan-beam, a linear array detector above the phantom, and an x-ray tube located rather close to the spine below the phantom—creates problems due to the magnification effect of the fan beam. The effect of decreasing the distance between the “vertebrae” of the phantom and the couch are: bone mineral content (BMC) increases by 2.8% per cm, projected area (Area) by 2.8% per cm, and bone mineral density (BMD) is unchanged.

When QDR-1000/W is upgraded to QDR-2000, BMD is relatively constant, but there are shifts of BMC and Area which are partly due to the magnification effect of the fanbeam. Replacement of a QDR-1000/W with a QDR-2000 can invalidate longitudinal measurements, even for BMD, unless the proportionality factors of the QDR-2000 are checked and, if necessary, changed. This is true for switching from QDR-1000/W to pencil-beam mode of QDR-2000 or to fanbeam mode of QDR-2000.

Even with pencil-beam mode, the long-term precision error with phantoms is higher for QDR-2000 than for QDR-1000/W (for BMD, 0.47% versus 0.35%).     

Rapid small-animal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using digital radiography.

Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is an established technique for clinical assessment of areal bone mineral density (BMD), the spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, scan time, and availability of clinical DEXA systems may be limiting factors for small-animal investigations using a large number of specimens. To avoid these limitations, we have implemented a clinical digital radiography system to perform rapid area DEXA analysis on in vitro rat bone specimens. A crossed step-wedge (comprised of epoxy-based materials that mimic the radiographic properties of tissue and bone) was used to calibrate the system. Digital radiographs of bone specimens (pelvis, spine, femur, and tibia from sham-ovariectomized [SHAM] and ovariectomized [OVX] rats) were obtained at 40 kilovolt peak (kVp) and 125 kVp, and the resulting areal BMD values were compared with those obtained with a clinical fan-beam DEXA system (Hologics QDR 4500). Our investigation indicates that the cross-wedge calibrated (CWC) DEXA technique provides high-precision measurements of bone mineral content (BMC; CV = 0.6%) and BMD (CV = 0.8%) within a short acquisition time (<30 s). Areal BMD measurements reported by the CWC-DEXA system are within 8.5% of those reported by a clinical fan-beam scanner, and BMC values are within 5% of the known value of test specimens. In an in vivo application, the CWC-DEXA system is capable of reporting significant differences between study groups (SHAM and OVX) that are not reported by a clinical fan-beam DEXA system, because of the reduced variance and improved object segmentation provided by the CWC-DEXA system.     

Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group

Reproducibility is a key issue in both clinical and research applications of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. To examine the longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for the measurement of mineral density in vivo and in vitro, the performance of a group of instruments in the course of a multicenter longitudinal clinical trial was monitored. Measures were performed on eight identical machines (Hologic QDR1000) and analyzed using the same automated software program. Short-term precision was good in vitro, [anthropomorphic spine phantoms; mean intrasite coefficient of variation (CV) 0.42 +/- 0.1% (SD)] and in vivo (lumbar spine; CV 1.1 +/- 0.5%). Intersite measures of a single spine phantom (specified mineral content -57.8 g) revealed a range of 57.3-58.4 g (CV 0.7%). In two subjects intersite CV in vivo were 3.7 and 2.1% (spine) and 1.8 and 3.2% (femoral neck). At five sites frequent phantom measures were performed over a 1 year period (mean number of measures 196) and revealed a mean all-point CV of 0.43% (range 0.35-0.53%). Longitudinal precision in vivo was somewhat less (mean CV of spinal measures 1.1%, femoral neck 1.2%, trochanter 1.3%, and Ward's area 2.4%). At one additional site large variations in phantom measures heralded repeated mechanical failures that eventually required machine replacement. In summary, DEXA demonstrates good in vitro and in vivo longitudinal precision, providing the basis for expanded clinical and research usefulness. Nevertheless, stringent quality assurance measures are required to detect and respond to system malfunctions.     

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Small Rats with Low Bone Mineral Density

The feasibility of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the Norland XR-26 Mark II bone densitometer for measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in small rats was evaluated. Thirty-two young, isogenic, Lewis rats (weights from 119 g to 227 g) were used; normal rats (n = 7) and rats with low BMD obtained from three different vitamin D-depleted models (n = 25). DXA measurements were performed using the special software for small animals. Duplicate scans of excised femurs performed at 2 mm/second (pixel size of 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm) were very precise measurements with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 1.6% in animals with normal BMD; in rats with low BMD, the CV was significantly higher (P= 0.02–0.04), 7.8% and 4.4% for BMC and BMD, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated that these measurements were related to the ash weight (R² > 98.6%). The CV for measurements of the lumbar spine at 10 mm/second (pixel size 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm) was 2.6% and 2.2% for BMC and BMD, respectively in rats with normal BMD, and again higher (P= 0.03–0.14) in rats with low BMD, 7.3% and 4.7%, respectively, for BMC and BMD. Even though low CVs were obtained for total body duplicate scans (scan speed of 20 mm/second and a pixel size of 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm), the measurements were problematic for accuracy because of an overestimation of both BMC and the area of bone. Using these scan parameters the measurements of total body bone mineral could not be recommended in small rats with low BMD. Received: 21 May 1999 / Accepted: 3 August 2000 / Online publication: 22 December 2000     

Effect of treadmill exercise on vertebral and tibial bone mineral content and bone mineral density in the aged adult rat: Determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Summary Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Hologic QDR-1000W) in an ultrahigh-resolution mode, was used to examine the changes in tibial/fibula and vertebral L4 +L5 bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in each 14-month-old female rat at 0, 9, and 16 weeks of study. Twenty rats were randomized by a stratified weight method into two groups, control and exercised. Exercise consisted of running on a flat-bed treadmill, 17 m/minute, 1 hour/day and 5 days/week. As compared with the control group, a significant increase in tibia/fibula BMC and vertebral BMD was apparent at 9 weeks after exercise training (P=0.014 by 2-way analysis of variance). The slope of the gain of the tibia/fibula BMC and BMD by 16 weeks of training was ninefold and fivefold higher than that of the control group (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively, by Mann-Whitney test). The correlation coefficient (r) between the final dry weight of excised bone and the final BMC of the intact rat was 0.843 and 0.71 for tibia/fibula and vertebrae, respectively. In summary, we found that in the aged rat, by 9 weeks, exercise increases BMC and BMD in the tibia, whereas in the vertebrae, only increases in the BMD were found. This study demonstrates that this precise and accurate DXA technique is useful in a longitudinal study of in vivo bone mineral changes in the rat over time by taking into account the individual variation between animals as well as changes between groups.     

Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry

Both dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) using 153Gd and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) can be used for measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the total skeleton and its seven major regions. The short-term precision (coefficient of variation, CV) of DEXA for total-body BMD using the medium (20 minute) and fast (10 minute) speeds was 0.34 and 0.68% in 5 normal subjects; the corresponding CV in 5 osteoporotic females were 0.70 and 1.04%. The CV for BMD using DPA was 0.82% in 8 normal subjects and 0.70% in 12 osteoporotic patients. The CV for regional BMD using DPA was similar to fast-speed DEXA, without significant differences (p NS); precision with medium-speed DEXA was superior to DPA, and the differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.05) for head, spine, trunk, ribs, and pelvis. Total-body measurements using both DPA and DEXA were done on 99 subjects (84 females and 15 males). Significant correlations (r = 0.98; p less than 0.001) were found between DEXA and DPA measurements of both BMC and BMD. There were also significant correlations (r = 0.94-0.98; p less than 0.001) between DEXA and DPA measurements of anatomic regions (head, trunk, spine, pelvis, ribs, arms, and legs). DPA and DEXA results for BMD of total skeleton, ribs, pelvis, and legs were similar (p NS), and statistically significant differences were found in head, spine, and arm measurements (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.01, and p less than 0.05, respectively); regression equations allowed adjustment of DEXA values in patients already measured with the earlier DPA method.     

Bone density of the radius,spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women

Summary Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2–L4) and hip (at femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and greater trochanter sites) were determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), and of the radius by single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) in healthy postmenopausal women aged 40–70 years. The relationships of BMC and BMD to years since menopause were examined separately in 97 women who were above 115% of ideal body weight (IBW) and in 128 women below. The heavier women had significantly greater mean BMC and BMD at each site than did the normal-weight women. In the normal-weight women, there was a significant negative correlation between BMD and years since menopause at each measurement site except the greater trochanter. In the obese women, BMD decreased with increasing years since menopause at the radius site only and BMC declined with increasing years after menopause at the hip (femoral neck and Ward's triangle region) as well as the radius. Thus, body size is a significant determinant of BMD in this population. The pattern of loss of BMD from Ward's triangle and femoral neck regions of hip are similar to that of the spine. The BMC and BMD findings in the hip suggest that remodeling occurs at this weight-bearing site which has a favorable effect on bone strength.     

Soy protein consumption and bone mass in early postmenopausal Chinese women

Recent interest has been shown in the potential beneficial effects of phytoestrogens on bone health. As the early years of menopause are a period of rapid bone loss, and the risk for osteoporosis increases substantially, the habitual intake of soy protein and isoflavones may play a role in the retardation of bone loss. This paper reports the results of the baseline cross-sectional analysis of the association between dietary soy protein intake and bone mineral density/content in a population-based study of Chinese women. The sample comprised 454 healthy Chinese women (mean age 55.1±3.57) within the first 12 years of postmenopause. We estimated the dietary intake of soy protein and isoflavones, and other key nutrients, including dietary protein and calcium, using the quantitative food frequency method. Bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at the spine, hip and total body were measured with a dual energy X-ray densitometer (Hologic 4500A). Soy protein consumption was categorized as quartiles of intake, and related to BMD values at the spine and hip, and BMC of total body. Stratified analyses were carried out among women within or at least 4 years postmenopausal. We observed few differences in BMD/BMC values among the intake quartiles in women within the first 4 years of menopause. However, among the later postmenopausal women, we noted a dose-response relationship with increasing higher BMD values at the trochanter, intertrochanter as well as the total hip and total body with increasing soy protein intake quartiles (P<0.05 from tests for trend). The BMD values differed by about 4–8% between the first and fourth soy protein intake quartiles. Though women from the fourth intake quartile had a 2.9% higher BMD value compared with those from the first intake quartile, the difference was not statistically significant. Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses showed the association between soy intake quartiles and hip BMD as well as total body BMC values remained after adjusting for body weight, which was retained in the final model. Analyses based on soy isoflavones content yielded similar results. This study demonstrated that, among women after the initial few years postmenopausal, soy protein/isoflavones intake had a modest but significant association with hip BMD as well as total body BMC. The effects of soy protein and soy isoflavones on bone health should be further explored in populations with habitual dietary soy intake.     

北京城区10?12岁女孩骨密度的研究

目的 观察10－12岁女孩骨密度（BMD）的变化。方法 对375例健康女孩行全身扫描和左前臂扫描，按首位（10岁）平均体重指数（BMI）分组为超重组（BMMI＞19．6）、正常组（BMI＝14．2－19．6）、偏轻组（BMI＜14．2）。1年和2年后，利用同台双能X线骨密度仪再次扫描，连续3年追踪观察该年龄段女孩每年BMD的变化。结果 全身各部位的BMD值和全身总的骨矿含量（BMC）值第2年明显高于第1年（P＜0．01－0．001）。第3年（12岁）与第2年（11岁）相比：仅前臂远端1／10处BMD值有明显增加（P＜0．001），前臂远端1／3处BMD值和全身总的BMD值无增加，且全身总的BMD值略有下降（P＞0．05）；但全身总的BMC值有明显增加（P＜0．001）。BMD、BMC值均以超重组最高，正常组次之，偏轻组最低。结论 青春期女孩不同部位的BMD值年增长率快慢不一，但全身总的BMC值总是随着年龄增长而增加。     

糖皮质激素对成年大鼠骨量的影响

目的利用双能X线吸收法(DXA)探讨成年大鼠接受糖皮质激素后骨量变化的规律。方法 21只44周龄SD雌性大鼠分别假性去卵巢+未注射糖皮质激素(SHAM组)、摘除双侧卵巢(OVX组)或注射甲基强的松龙[2.5 mg/(kg·d)](PRED组),应用扇形束DXA(QDR-4500A)每4周测定一次全身骨密度(BMD)、骨矿含量(BMC)、骨骼面积(AREA);术后12周处死,测定离体腰椎、股骨、胫骨及其兴趣区的BMD、BMC、AREA。压缩试验测定第二腰椎最大载荷和弹性模量。结果 (1)术后8周开始OVX组体重显著重于同龄SHAM组(8周时,P0.05,12周时P0.01),术后4周开始PRED组体重显著轻于同龄SHAM组(P0.05);(2)术后12周OVX组整体BMC显著高于SHAM组(P0.05),术后8、12周OVX组整体BMC显著高于PRED组(P0.05);(3)术后12周OVX组离体第5、6腰椎BMD及第6腰椎BMC显著低于SHAM组和PRED组(P0.05),PRED组离体各腰椎BMD、BMC、AREA与SHAM组无明显差异;(4)术后12周与SHAM组比较,OVX组离体股骨(-7.42%)、股骨远端(-10.85%)和近端(-6.92%)、胫骨近端(-11.40%)BMD显著降低(P0.05),其中股骨、股骨远端、胫骨近端BMC也显著降低(P0.05);(5)术后12周与SHAM组比较,PRED组离体股骨及各区BMD、BMC、AREA无显著性差异,整体胫骨及各区BMD无显著性差异;(6)术后12周与SHAM组比较,OVX组及PRED组胫骨中远端骨量增加;(7)与SHAM组比较,OVX组最大载荷和弹性模量显著降低,PRED组最大载荷显著降低。结论成熟期大鼠接受甲基强的松龙后,皮质骨和松质骨骨量没有显著变化,DXA检查难以发现其骨丢失情况;力学性能改变提示糖皮质激素更多的是引起骨质量的改变而导致了力学性能的下降及骨折的发生。     

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius

Summary Radial diaphyseal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the standard one-third site by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by¹²⁵I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) in 70 consecutive subjects, aged 12–86 years, with metabolic disorders of the skeleton. Each patient was measured once by the DEXA (Hologic QDR-1000) instrument and four times by the SPA (Norland 2780) instrument on the same day by one or the other of 2 technicians. The DEXA and SPA measurements were linearly related and highly correlated (r=0.975,P<0.0001) over a range from severe osteopenia to high normal BMD. Ninety-five percent of the variation in the BMD determined by SPA was accounted for by DEXA, so that the BMD_SPA=1.035±0.027 (SEM)×BMD_DEXA−0.007±0.019 (SEM). This permits continued use of previously accumulated SPA databases. The coefficient of variation for repeat measurements by DEXA was 1.2% and by SPA 1.6%. Examination time by DEXA was 6–7 minutes, about 45% shorter than the corresponding SPA determinations. DEXA is the superior method for evaluation of the radius, as it provides faster and more precise measurements in clinical practice.     

佛山市1899例健康体检者腰椎及左侧髋部骨密度测定结果分析

目的 了解佛山市正常人群腰椎及左侧髋部骨密度(BMD)变化规律,探讨不同地区根据机型不同确定骨密度峰值(PBMD)的临床意义.方法 利用Hologic公司DELPHI型双能x线骨密度仪(DEXA)测量佛山市1899例健康体检者的正位椎体及左侧髋部BMD,分性别、以5岁为1个年龄段对测量结果分层进行统计学分析,确定PBMD及标准差(SD),并与由厂家提供的亚洲标准数据库正常参考值对照.结果 佛山市男性和女性正位腰椎(L1-4)、左侧股骨颈(Neck)、左侧股骨粗隆(Troch)、左侧沃氏区(Ward's)PBMD值分别为0.988、0.996、0.833、0.806、0.727、0.712、0.780和0.768 g/cm2.除男性正位腰椎和沃氏区PBMD出现在25～29岁年龄段外,其余PBMD均出现在30～34岁年龄段.除男性沃氏区和女性股骨粗隆PBMD与机内提供的正常参考值无统计学差异(P值分别为0.832、0.504)外,其他区域PBMD明显低于机内提供的正常参考值(P＜0.01).结论 佛山市腰椎及左侧髋部各区域PBMD年龄段与国内其他地区基本一致,但标准亚洲人数据库提供的PBMD参考值不适合DELPHI型DEXA评价该地区人群骨骼健康状况.     

Bone Loss at the Os Calcis Compared with Sone Loss at the Knee in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Background/Objective: The objective of this study was to document acute bone loss at the os calcis and compare it with bone lossat the knee following spinal cord injury (SCI) as a potential proxy for bone loss in individuals with SCI.

Methods: Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the knee and os calcis, whichalso was assessed by ultrasound in 6 individuals-5 with complete SCI and 1 with incomplete SCI-at means of 33.5 and 523 daysfollowing injury.

Results: Bone mineralwas progressively greater as measured from proximal to distal sites. The net average BMD of the knee declined24% (P = 0.017). The distalfemurlost 27% (P = 0.03 8) and the proximal tibia lost 32% (P = 0 .015) , whereas the os calcis lost3 8% (P = 0.001) as measured by DEXA and 49% (P<0.001) as estimated from ultrasound. The mean loss of 24'7'o at the kneewas significantly different from the loss percentages at the os calcis as measured by both techniques: DEXA (P = 0.036) andultrasound (P = 0.043). Differences between annualized loss rates at the knee and the os calcis measured by both techniques alsowere significant: DEXA (P = 0.032) vs ultrasound (P = 0.038). However, annualized loss rates demonstrated the same trend fordifferentiallass at the sites examined in the 5 individuals with complete injuries but not for the 1 participant with an incomplete injury.The loss rates were similar for the complete and incomplete participants at the os calcis, but not at the knee.

Conclusion: The BMD of the os calcis declined 3 8% by DEXA and 49% by ultrasound compared with 24% at the knee whenmeasured 1 to 1.5 years after injury. BMD of the os calcis and distal femur measured by DEXA in persons with complete SCI werehighly correlated (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001 ).     

Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: Upgrading from a hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000

Summary In this study, the cross-calibration of a fan beam DXA system (Hologic QDR-2000) to a pencil beam scanner from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR-1000/W) is described. The scanners were calibrated by the manufacturer using the same anthropomorphic spine phantom at installation. To verify consistent machine calibration, a group of 69 female subjects, aged 46–75, had anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur scans on the QDR-1000/W followed by pencil and array scans of the same sites on the QDR-2000 during the same visit. Many of the subjects had bilateral examinations of the proximal femur for a total of 123 hip scans. Pencil and array area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) from the QDR-2000 were compared with the values obtained on the QDR-1000/W, and linear regression equations were derived for relating the two instruments. At the spine, no differences were found between the QDR-1000/W BMD values and the QDR-2000 array BMD values. A slight difference between pencil beam modes was detected but was not deemed clinically significant. Linear regression models relating the QDR-2000 and QDR-1000/W AP spine BMD measurements showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.99, with slopes of 1.00, intercepts equivalent to zero, and small root mean square errors. Comparisons at the proximal femur showed equivalency at the femoral neck and trochanter regions for the two machines in pencil mode, but slight increases in BMC and BMD at the other femoral sites on the QDR-2000 in both pencil and array mode. Correlation coefficients were 0.97–0.99 for all measurement regions except for Ward's. Regression slopes relating the BMD for the femoral regions were 1.00–1.04, with intercepts not significantly different from zero and small residual errors. As with the spine, the differences were small enough that they were not of clinical significance. However, in longitudinal drug trials requiring highly precise determination of spinal and femoral BMD changes, these differences may be important.     

Measurement of spinal bone mineral density on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with and without leg elevation.

Although it is generally recommended that patients keep their hips flexed by 90 degrees during the measurement of spinal bone mineral density (BMD), there is no uniform agreement among the manufacturers of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners regarding the positioning of legs while scanning the spine. We measured spinal BMD in 54 postmenopausal women, from L1 to L4 in posterior-anterior projection, using a Hologic Discovery scanner, first with their legs elevated as recommended by the manufacturer and then with their legs flat on the scanning table. Differences of bone mineral content (BMC), area of the region of interest (ROI), BMD, and T-score of the total spine between the 2 scans were compared. The mean (SD) age of the women was 54.3 yr (15 yr). Between the 2 scans, BMC, area of the ROI, BMD, and T-scores showed high correlations (r=0.98, 0.94, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively). BMC and the area of the ROI changed significantly between the 2 scans, but the changes of BMD and T-scores were not significant. The percentage changes of BMC and the area of the ROI were similar (2.6% and 2.4%, respectively), whereas T-scores showed no change and change of BMD was only 0.6%. The absolute difference in BMD between the 2 scans was only 0.005 (p=0.09). When spinal BMD was measured with their legs elevated, 31 women were found to have osteoporosis and further 13 were found to have osteopenia. When spinal BMD was measured with their legs flat, 32 women were found to have osteoporosis and further 12 were found to have osteopenia. In conclusion, no clinically or statistically significant difference in the total spinal BMD was found when the BMD in a group of women was measured on a Hologic Discovery DXA scanner with their legs positioned flat.