Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, several adhesives have been proposed for bonding fiber posts into root canals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of four adhesive procedures in resin tag, adhesive lateral branch and resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ) formation when used to bond fiber posts. METHOD: Forty anterior teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons and endodontically treated, were selected for this study. The samples were randomly divided into four groups of ten samples each. Group 1: One Step applied with the small brush provided by the manufacturer and LC (Light-cured before resin cement application)+Dual Link resin cement; Group 2: One Step applied with a thin microbrush LC+Dual Link resin cement; Group 3: One Step applied with a small brush (Not light-cured)+Dual Link resin cement; Group 4: All Bond 2+C & B resin cement (as control). In Group 2 and 4 the adhesive system and resin cement were used strictly following manufacturers' instructions. In Group 1, One Step was applied using a thin microbrush, while in the other groups by a small brush. In Group 1 and 2 the priming-adhesive solution of the "one-bottle" system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post, whereas in Group 3 the adhesive/resin cement combination was light cured through the translucent post. Forty translucent posts (RTD, France) were used. A week later, the root samples were processed for SEM observations. RESULTS: Microscopic examination of restored interfaces of Group 1 showed a higher % (P<0.05) of RDIZ than those found in samples of Group 2, 3 and 4. In Group 2, 3 and 4 samples RDIZ morphology was well detectable and uniform in the first two thirds of root canals while in the apical third the RDIZ was not uniformly present. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups coronally, whereas apical and middle thirds of Group 1 showed significantly more resin tags than the other three Groups. In the apical third of Group 2, 3 and 4 samples, the resin tags showed a less uniform morphology and a shorter length than those found in the other two thirds. SIGNIFICANCE: A microbrush might clinically be used for bonding fiber posts into the root canal. When a microbrush was used, the bonding mechanism created between root canal dentin and bonding system was uniform along canal walls and more predictable.     

Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two brushes used as carriers of a primer-adhesive solution as to the formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and a hybrid layer when used to bond translucent fiber posts. Twenty endodontically treated teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were used. The samples were randomly divided into two groups of 10 samples each (Group 1: Microbrush + Scotchbond 1 + Rely X ARC resin cement; Group 2: small plastic brush + Scotchbond 1 + Rely X ARC resin cement). The adhesive system and resin cement were used strictly following manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution of the one-bottle system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post. Twenty translucent fiber posts were used. After luting procedures, root samples were processed for SEM observations. The adhesive system showed a resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ), resin tag, and adhesive lateral branch formation. Microscopic examination of restored interfaces of group 1 showed a higher percentage (p < 0.05) of RDIZ than those found in samples of group 2. In group 1 samples, RDIZ morphology was well detectable and uniform in all thirds of the root canals. In group 2, RDIZ was not visible in the apical third. No statistically significant differences were found among the two groups coronally and at the middle third, but the apical third of group 1 showed significantly more resin tag formation than group 2. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of the root canals of both groups and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third of group 2 root canals, the resin tags showed a less uniform morphology and a shorter length than those found in the other observed thirds.     

An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of three 'one-bottle' and two 'three step' adhesive systems (as controls) in the formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches and a resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ) when used to bond fiber posts under clinical conditions. This study was performed using standardized SEM observations and scoring resin tag formation and density. METHODS: Fifty root canal treated teeth, already scheduled for extraction for endodontic or periodontal reasons, were selected for this study. The patients were informed and their written consent was obtained. The samples were randomly allocated to five groups of ten samples each. Group 1: All Bond 2 with C & B (Bisco); Group 2: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus with Opal Luting Composite (3M); Group 3: Scotchbond 1 in combination with Rely X ARC resin cement (3M); Group 4: One-step with C & B resin cement (Bisco); Group 5: All Bond Experimental with Post Cement HI-X (Bisco). The adhesive systems and resin cements were used strictly according to the manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution of each 'one-bottle' system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post. Fifty Aestheti-Plus posts (white quartz fiber posts, RTD, France) were used. A week later, the roots were extracted and processed for SEM observations. RESULTS: All the adhesive systems showed a RDIZ and resin tag and adhesive lateral branch formation. Microscopic examination of the restored interfaces of Groups 1 and 2 showed a higher percent of RDIZ than those found in samples of Groups 3, 4 and 5. RDIZ morphology was easily detectable and uniform in the first two thirds of the root canals, whilst in the apical third the RDIZ was not uniformly present. Resin tag morphology and formation were significantly more detectable in the cervical and middle areas than in the apical zone. No statistically significant differences were found among the five groups coronally, while in the apical and middle thirds two 'one-bottle' systems (Groups 3 and 4) showed significantly less resin tags than the control Groups 1, 2 and the experimental Group 5. No statistically significant differences were found among the three 'one-bottle' systems in the three evaluated areas. The standardization of SEM observations and scoring resin tag formation allowed statistical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The 'three step' adhesive systems can create a wider micromechanical interlocking between adhesive materials and etched dentin than 'one-step' systems.     

Influence of brush type as a carrier of adhesive solutions and paper points as an adhesive-excess remover on the resin bond to root dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the brush type as a carrier of priming adhesive solutions and the use of paper points as a remover of the excess of these solutions on the push-out bond strength of resin cement to bovine root dentin. The null hypotheses were that brush type and the use of paper points do not affect the bond strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The canals of 80 single-root bovine roots (16 mm in length) were prepared at 12 mm using the preparation drill (FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar). Half of each root was embedded in acrylic resin and the specimens were divided into 8 groups, considering the factors "brush type" (4 levels) and "paper point" (2 levels) (n = 10): Gr 1: small microbrush (Cavi-Tip, SDI); Gr 2: Microbrush (Dentsply); Gr 3: Endobrush (Bisco); Gr 4: conventional brush (Bisco); Gr 5: Cavi-Tip (SDI) + paper points; Gr 6: Microbrush (Dentsply) + paper points; Gr 7: Endobrush (Bisco) + paper points; Gr 8: conventional brush (Bisco) + paper points. The root dentin was treated with a multistep total-etch adhesive system (All Bond 2). The adhesive system was applied using each microbrush, with and without using paper points. One fiber post was molded with addition silicon and 80 posts were made of resin cement (Duolink). The resin posts were luted (Duolink resin cement), and the specimens were stored for 24 h in water at 37 degrees C. Each specimen was cut into 4 disk-shaped samples (1.8 mm in thickness), which were submitted to the push-out test. RESULTS: The brush type (p < 0.0001) (small microbrush > microbrush = endobrush = conventional brush) and the use of paper points (p = 0.0001) (with > without) influenced the bond strength significantly (two-way ANOVA). The null hypotheses were rejected. CONCLUSION: The smallest brush (Cavi-Tip) and the use of paper points significantly improved the resin bond to bovine root dentin.     

Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new bonding-luting system in resin tag, adhesive lateral branch, and hybrid layer formation when used in combination with an experimental fiber post. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty anterior teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were selected for this study. They were endodontically treated and randomly divided into three groups of 10 samples each: group 1 = Excite light-cured bonding agent in combination with Variolink II resin cement; group 2 = Excite dual-cured bonding agent self-activated by an experimental microbrush in combination with MultiLink resin cement; and group 3 = one-step bonding system in combination with Dual Link resin cement. In groups 1 and 3, the primer-adhesive solution was light cured before placing the resin cement and the post, whereas in group 2 the adhesive/luting materials were not light cured. Twenty FRC Postec translucent posts (groups 1 and 2) and 10 EndoAesthetic translucent fiber posts (group 3) were used. One week later, the root samples were processed for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observations. RESULTS: Microscopic examinations of restored interfaces from group 2 revealed a resin-dentin interdiffusion zone higher than that seen in samples from groups 1 and 3 (P < .05). At the apical and middle thirds, the samples from group 2 showed significantly more resin tags than the other two groups. CONCLUSION: The dual-cure self-activating system showed a more uniform resin tag and resin-dentin interdiffusion zone formation along root canal walls than light-curing systems.     

A one step procedure for luting glass fibre posts: an SEM evaluation

AIM: To evaluate the ability of two luting procedures for bonding translucent fibre posts to form resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and resin dentine interdiffusion zones (RDIZ). METHODOLOGY: Forty root filled teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected for the study. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Group 1: One Step, light-cured (LC) 20 s + dual link resin cement (LC 20 s); group 2: One Step, not light-cured (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 30 s); group 3: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 60 s); group 4: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 90 sec). Forty translucent fibre posts (DT posts, RTD) were inserted. Then, root specimens were processed for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations to assess the continuity of the RDIZ, the presence or absence of gaps and the density and morphology of resin tags using a four-step scale method. RESULTS: With all luting procedures the formation of a RDIZ occurred. However, the microscopic examination of adhesive interfaces revealed that the percentage of RDIZ was significantly higher in group 1 than in the other three groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had a higher percentage of RDIZ than group 3, which in turn exhibited a greater percentage than group 2, but these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Resin tag formation was evident in all the groups. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of all groups, and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third a shorter length and a less uniform appearance of resin tags were noted in groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, when bonding a translucent fibre post into a root canal, the luting procedure including light curing of the adhesive solution before the placement of the cement was more satisfactory, from a SEM standpoint, than the procedure involving the simultaneous curing of adhesive and cement (one step procedure).     

SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts

PURPOSE: To verify with SEM the cement layer thickness and uniformity of resin-relined translucent fiber posts (anatomic posts) and standard translucent fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On 20 extracted maxillary anterior teeth, the roots were endodontically treated and prepared for the insertion of a fiber post. Translucent fiber posts (DT) were luted with a dual-curing resin cement (Duo-Link) in 10 specimens (group 1) after the canal walls had been treated with the One-Step bonding system. In the other 10 specimens (group 2), experimental anatomic posts (Anatomic Post'n Core) were tested. To these posts, a layer of light-curing resin is added to allow for a pre-cementation relining of the post, aimed at improving its fit into the endodontic space. For luting, the same adhesive-resin cement combination of group 1 was used. All the roots were sectioned and prepared for SEM observations. At the 1-mm, 4.5-mm, and 8-mm level of each root, cement thickness was measured, and the presence of gaps or voids within the luting material or at its interfaces was evaluated. A statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of differences in the cement layer thickness around the two types of post and at different levels of the same type of post. RESULTS: In the presence of anatomic posts, the cement layer was significantly thinner and more uniform at the coronal and middle level of the root. In both groups, voids and bubbles were detected within the luting material, within the abutment material, and between fiber post and cement. Gaps were also visible between post and relining material. CONCLUSIONS: The resin cement thickness was significantly lower in the anatomic post group than in the control group (standardized posts), except at the apical third of the canal, where there was no statistically significant difference. A good adaptation of anatomic posts was evident in all of the specimens.     

Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth

PURPOSE: Restoration of root-treated teeth is routinely performed in clinical practice with a choice of therapeutic options, considering many factors to provide optimal mechanical properties, esthetics, and longevity. The aim of the present work was to present a preliminary clinical report on the use of fiber posts and direct resin composites for restoring root-treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight anterior and 62 posterior endodontically treated teeth were selected from 3 private prosthodontic offices. The protocol used included endodontic treatment, with translucent fiber posts (DT post) bonded to the post-space using a '1-bottle' adhesive (One-Step, Bisco) and a dual-cure resin cement (DuoLink, Bisco). Direct resin restorations were performed using a micro-hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct, GC) and a layering technique. Both opaque dentin and enamel and translucent enamel shades were used. RESULTS: Patients were recalled after 6, 12, 24, and 30 months, and the restorations assessed according to predetermined clinical and radiographic criteria. These clinician-mediated evaluation methods confirmed the good clinical performance of the restorations. CONCLUSION: Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with fiber posts and direct resin composites is a treatment option, that in the short term conserves remaining tooth structure and results in good patient compliance.     

纤维桩导光性对根管内树脂水门汀聚合的影响

目的:评价2种不同导光性能的纤维桩对根管深部树脂水门汀聚合程度的影响.方法:16颗单根人前磨牙去冠后根管预备,随机分为导光组和非导光组(n=8).分别以i-TFC导光纤维桩和非导光性Pananiva纤维桩联合光固化树脂水门汀行桩核修复.每个修复后的牙根制备3枚牙本质片,依照其位置分为根颈段、根中段、根尖段.测试2组树脂水门汀在根管不同深度的努氏(Knoop)显微硬度值(HK)并计算其相对聚合度,进行双因素方差分析.结果:随根管深度的增加,2组树脂水门汀的显微硬度和相对固化率均呈下降趋势,根颈段和中段2项指标组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).导光组和非导光组树脂水门汀在根尖段的HK值分别为33.25±3.04和23.80±5.93(P＜0.05).在根尖段的相对聚合度分别为69.89％与50.05％ (P＜0.05).结论:导光纤维桩有助于提高树脂水门汀在根尖区域的聚合程度.     

不同厚度树脂水门汀及不同根管部位对纤维桩粘固效果的影响

目的比较不同厚度树脂水门汀及不同根管部位对纤维桩粘固效果的影响。方法32个单根管离体前牙截冠后常规根管治疗,随机分为四组,按不同桩道直径（1.1mm、1.25mm、1.35mm、1.5mm）进行根管预备,并通过自酸蚀粘结系统及树脂水门汀将直径1.1mm规格纤维桩粘固于预备后的根管内,切割为1.5mm厚试件并将其按照根管深度分为上部、中部和下部,分别测试其推出强度。结果与对照组1.1mm相比,在相同根管部位,1.25mm、1.35mm的推出强度较高（P〈0.05）,1.5mm最低（P〈0.05）,各组内根管上部推出强度显著高于下部（P〈0.05）。结论树脂水门汀厚度及根管部位对纤维桩的固位效果产生一定的影响。     

Retention of radicular posts varying the application technique of the adhesive system and luting agent

This study evaluated in vitro the retention of intracanal cast posts cemented with dual-cure resin varying the application method of the primer/adhesive solution and luting agent in the prosthetic space prepared to receive the posts. Sixty endodontically treated maxillary canines had their crowns discarded, and their roots were embedded in acrylic resin. The prosthetic spaces were prepared with Largo burs mounted on a low-speed handpiece coupled to a parallelometer in order to maintain length and diameter of intraradicular posts constant and to guarantee that the preparations were parallel after casting. Two groups (n = 30) were randomly formed according to the device used to apply the adhesive system: microbrush or standard bristle brush (control). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) according to the technique used to place the luting agent into the root canal: using only a lentulo spiral before setting the post, applying it onto the post surface, or combining both methods. After 72 hours, the tensile force required to dislodge each post was determined by a universal testing machine (Instron 4444) set at a speed of 1 mm/min. The results indicated that the use of the microbrush yielded higher bond strength values (0.1740 +/- 0.04 kN) than those recorded for the bristle brush tip (0.1369 +/- 0.04 kN, p < 0.001). Bonferroni's test demonstrated a higher retention (p < 0.001) in radicular post cemented with the technique that combined both methods (lentulo + post: 0.1787 +/- 0.03 kN) than that obtained with lentulo (0.1461 +/- 0.065 kN) or post (0.1416 +/- 0.03 kN) alone. The interactions between the adhesive system and luting agent application techniques presented statistical difference (p < 0.001). It was concluded that the best performance in terms of tensile strength among the tested conditions was obtained when the adhesive system was applied with a microbrush and the luting agent was taken into the root canal with lentulo spirals alone (0.1961 +/- 0.04 kN) and combining both methods (lentulo + post: 0.1911 +/- 0.02 kN).     

The adhesive system and root canal region do not influence the degree of conversion of dual resin cement

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two adhesive systems and the post space region on the degree of conversion of dual resin cement and its bond strength to root dentin.

Material and Methods

One three-step etch-andrinse (All-bond 2, Bisco) and another one-step self-etch (Xeno III, Dentsply) adhesive systems were applied on 20 (n=10) crownless bovine incisors, at 12-mm-deep post space preparation, and a fiber post (DT Light Post, Bisco) was cemented using a dual cure resin cement (Duo-Link, Bisco). Three transverse sections (3 mm) were obtained, being one from each study region (cervical, middle and apical). The degree of conversion of the dual cure resin cement was determined by a micro-Raman spectrometer. The data (%) were submitted to repeated-measures analysis of variance and Tukey''s test (p<0.05).

Results

For both groups, the degree of conversion means (%) (All bond 2_cervical = 69.3; All bond 2_middle = 55.1; All bond 2_apical= 56; Xeno III_cervical = 68.7; Xeno III_middle = 68.8; Xeno III_apical = 54.3) were not significantly different along the post space regions (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Neither the adhesive nor the post space region influenced the degree of conversion of the cement layer.     

Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study

PURPOSE: This study prospectively evaluated the clinical performance of three types of translucent posts over a follow-up period of between 2 and 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selected were 225 patients with one premolar in need of endodontic treatment, followed by restoration with a fiber post and porcelain crown. The sample was randomly divided into three groups of 75 patients each. The same type of post was used in all patients within a group: group 1 = Aesthetic Plus; group 2 = DT; and group 3 = FRC Postec. For bonding the post, a light-curing adhesive (One-Step) and a dual-curing resin cement (Duo-Link) were applied in group 1 and 2 roots, whereas self-curing materials (Excite DSC as adhesive and MultiLink as resin cement) were used in group 3. After 6, 12, and 24 months, patients were recalled, and a clinical and radiographic examination was performed. For some patients, 30-month follow-up data were also collected. RESULTS: Debonding of the post occurrred in eight cases (3.5%); in another six cases, a recurrence of the periapical lesion was reported. CONCLUSION: The statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in the survival rate of the tested posts, suggesting that all are equally and sufficiently reliable for clinical use.     

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVE SYSTEMS ON THE PULL-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF GLASS FIBER POSTS

This in vitro study evaluated the tensile bond strength of glass fiber posts (Reforpost – Angelus-Brazil) cemented to root dentin with a resin cement (RelyX ARC – 3M/ESPE) associated with two different adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond - 3M/ESPE and Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose (MP) Plus – 3M/ESPE), using the pull-out test. Twenty single-rooted human teeth with standardized root canals were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=10): G1- etching with 37% phosphoric acid gel (3M/ESPE) + Adper Single Bond + #1 post (Reforpost – Angelus) + four #1 accessory posts (Reforpin – Angelus) + resin cement; G2- etching with 37% phosphoric acid gel + Adper Scotchbond MP Plus + #1 post + four #1 accessory posts + resin cement. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7 days and submitted to the pull-out test in a universal testing machine (EMIC) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean values of bond strength (kgf) and standard deviation were: G1- 29.163 ± 7.123; G2- 37.752 ±13.054. Statistical analysis (Student''s t-test; α=0.05 showed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups. Adhesive bonding failures between resin cement and root canal dentin surface were observed in both groups, with non-polymerized resin cement in the apical portion of the post space when Single Bond was used (G1). The type of adhesive system employed on the fiber post cementation did not influence the pull-out bond strength.     

Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin

This study correlated the morphological characteristics with the bond strengths of various resin cements used for bonding fiber posts to root canal dentin. Fifty glass-fiber posts (FRC Postec Plus) were luted into the root canals of extracted human anterior teeth using five resin cements ( n  = 10): Panavia F 2.0, PermaFlo DC, Variolink II, RelyX Unicem, and Clearfil Core. Before insertion of the post, the adhesive systems were labeled with fluorescein and the resin cement was labeled with rhodamine isothiocyanate. The roots were sectioned into three slices (of 2 mm thickness), and each slice was analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscopy in dual fluorescence mode to determine hybrid layer thickness, the number of resin tags, and the number of broken tags. Bond strengths were measured using a micro push-out test. Bond strengths to root canal dentin, as well as the morphological characteristics, were significantly affected by the materials. However, these factors did not correlate. The self-adhesive resin cement, which showed the formation of a hybrid layer and resin tags only sporadically, had the highest bond strengths. These results indicate that chemical interactions between the adhesive cement and hydroxyapatite may be more crucial for root dentin bonding than the ability of the same material to hybridize dentin.     

纤维桩与根管不同处理后剪切粘结强度实验研究及电镜观察

目的比较四种不同粘结系统处理后纤维桩与根管各部剪切粘结强度,探讨其内在机理。方法 25颗完整离体尖牙于釉牙骨质界冠方2mm处截冠。根管治疗后分五组修复：DTlight纤维桩＋3M Unicem组,DTlight纤维桩＋可乐丽DCcore组,DTlight纤维桩＋Dual-link（Bisco）组,DTlight纤维桩＋Lux-acoreZ组（纤维桩表面涂布粘结剂）,DTlight纤维桩＋Luxacore组（纤维桩表面未涂布粘结剂）。包埋后切片对不同根管段行剪切粘结实验,体视显微镜下观察断裂模式,记录数据并统计分析;每组选取2个样本进行扫描电镜观察粘结界面形态。结果剪切粘结强度（MPa）依次为：6.61±1.82,7.72±2.03,5.35±1.42,10.15±0.67,7.25±0.71。体视显微镜观察显示绝大部分样本的断裂方式都是树脂/纤维桩界面断裂。扫描电镜观察显示不同处理后其显微结构各不相同。结论纤维桩修复的剪切粘结强度与粘结部位、粘结材料密切相关。     

不同材料根管桩剪切粘结强度的比较

目的:比较新型石英纤维强化树脂桩和铸造不锈钢桩与树脂类粘结剂粘结后剪切粘结强度的差异,为临床合理选择桩核系统、优化修复设计提供实验依据。方法:选用正常人离体上颌中切牙20颗随机分成两组,截冠处理并预备桩道。制作40个环氧树脂立方体模块并于中央备洞。将两组牙根固定于模块中,分别粘结石英纤维桩与不锈钢桩的一端于牙根桩道内,另一端均用自凝塑料垂直固定于模块中央。模块与力学试验机拉力杆相连,加载速度1mm/min,方向为平行于桩的长轴与牙根脱离的方向剪切牵拉。记录根管桩脱离时的最大载荷和脱落模式。结果:石英纤维桩组的剪切粘结强度(360.58N±19.12N)高于铸造不锈钢桩组(250.82N±22.34N),完全随机设计资料的t检验显示P<0.05,两者差异有显著性。结论:石英纤维桩与树脂类粘结剂的剪切粘结强度明显优于传统铸造镍铬合金桩与粘结剂;石英纤维桩可成为美容牙科修复的有效选择。     

Effect of adhesive system type and tooth region on the bond strength to dentin

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the bond strength of two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (two- and three-step) and a self-etching system to coronal and root canal dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canals of 30 human incisors and canines were instrumented and prepared with burs. The posts used for luting were duplicated with dual resin cement (Duo-link) inside Aestheti Plus #2 molds. Thus, three groups were formed (n = 10) according to the adhesive system employed: All-Bond 2 (TE3) + resin cement post (rcp) + Duo-link (Dl); One-Step Plus (TE2) + rcp + Dl; Tyrian/One-Step Plus (SE) + rcp + Dl. Afterwards, 8 transverse sections (1.5 mm) were cut from 4 mm above the CEJ up to 4 mm short of the root canal apex, comprising coronal and root canal dentin. The sections were submitted to push-out testing in a universal testing machine EMIC (1 mm/min). Bond strength data were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The relationship between the adhesives was not the same in the different regions (p < 0.05). Comparison of the means achieved with the adhesives in each region (Tukey; p < 0.05) revealed that TE3 (mean +/- standard deviation: 5.22 +/- 1.70) was higher than TE2 (2.60 +/- 1.74) and SE (1.68 +/- 1.85). CONCLUSION: Under the experimental conditions, better bonding to dentin was achieved using the three-step etch-and-rinse system, especially in the coronal region. Therefore, the traditional etch-and-rinse three-step adhesive system seems to be the best choice for teeth needing adhesive endodontic restorations.     

Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a filled adhesive (One-Step Plus; Bisco) versus an unfilled adhesive (One-Step; Bisco) on the microtensile bond strength (muTBS) to dentin using total-etch (Uni-etch; Bisco) and self-etch (Tyrian SPE; Bisco) techniques. METHODS: Twenty extracted human third molars were ground flat to expose occlusal dentin. After the dentin surfaces were polished with 600-grit SiC paper, the teeth were randomly assigned to four groups according to the bonding agent and technique being used. Dentin surfaces were bonded with One-Step Plus+total-etch; One-Step Plus+self-etch; One-Step+total-etch and One-Step+self-etch. Composite buildups were performed with Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical). Following storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the bonded specimens were serially sectioned into 0.7 mm-thick slabs and then trimmed to hour-glass shapes with a 1 mm2 cross-sectional area (n=20). Microtensile bond strengths were determined using the EZ-test (Shimadzu) at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the muTBS between One-Step Plus and One-Step adhesives when they were used with the total-etch and self-etch techniques (p>0.05). However with the total-etch technique both adhesives yielded significantly higher bond strength values than the self-etch technique (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The filled adhesive One-Step Plus did not show any beneficial effect than the unfilled adhesive One-Step on the muTBS to dentin with total-etch and self-etch techniques. Irrespective from the adhesive type, self-etch technique revealed lower bond strengths than the total-etch technique.     

Multi-step adhesive cementation versus one-step adhesive cementation: push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin before and after mechanical cycling

This study evaluated the effects of mechanical cycling on resin push-out bond strength to root dentin, using two strategies for fiber post cementation. Forty bovine roots were embedded in acrylic resin after root canal preparation using a custom drill of the fiber post system. The fiber posts were cemented into root canals using two different strategies (N = 20): a conventional adhesive approach using a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system combined with a conventional resin cement (ScotchBond Multi Purpose Plus + RelyX ARC ), or a simplified adhesive approach using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U100). The core was built up with composite resin and half of the specimens from each cementation strategy were submitted to mechanical cycling (45 degree angle; 37 degrees C; 88 N; 4 Hz; 700,000 cycles). Each specimen was cross-sectioned and the disk specimens were pushed-out. The means from every group (n = 10) were statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and a Tukey test (P = 0.05). The cementation strategy affected the push-out results (P < 0.001), while mechanical cycling did not (P = 0.3716). The simplified approach (a self-adhesive resin cement) had better bond performance despite the conditioning. The self-adhesive resin cement appears to be a good option for post cementation. Further trials are needed to confirm these results.