Prevention of pelvic floor disorders: international urogynecological association research and development committee opinion

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic floor disorders (PFD), including urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse, are common and have a negative effect on the quality of life of women. Treatment is associated with morbidity and may not be totally satisfactory. Prevention of PFDs, when possible, should be a primary goal. The purpose of this paper is to summarise the current literature and give an evidence-based review of the prevention of PFDs

Methods

A working subcommittee from the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Research and Development (R&D) Committee was formed. An initial document addressing the prevention of PFDs was drafted, based on a review of the English-language literature. After evaluation by the entire IUGA R&D Committee, revisions were made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion on the prevention of PFDs.

Results

This R&D Committee Opinion reviews the literature on the prevention of PFDs and summarises the findings with evidence-based recommendations.

Conclusions

Pelvic floor disorders have a long latency, and may go through periods of remission, thus making causality difficult to confirm. Nevertheless, prevention strategies targeting modifiable risk factors should be incorporated into clinical practice before the absence of symptomatology.

     

Management of refractory urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery with sacral neuromodulation

AIMS: We sought to explore our patient outcomes utilizing sacral neuromodulation in the management of refractory urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgical procedures. METHODS: A total of 25 women with urinary urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery were selected for SNS therapy and retrospectively analyzed. All patients completed a comprehensive urological evaluation. Clinical data was recorded to determine outcomes and identify parameters that would be predictive of response to neuromodulation. Outcomes were determined via subjective patient questionnaire and graded as follows: significant response (> or =80% improvement), moderate response (> or =50% and <80% improvement), and poor response (<50% response). RESULTS: Nineteen patients had a previous pubovaginal sling (10 with concomitant pelvic prolapse repair), 3 a previous retropubic suspension, and 3 a transperitoneal vesicovaginal fistula repair. Urethrolysis was performed in 4 patients to alleviate bladder outlet obstruction prior to sacral neuromodulation. Mean patient age was 59.8 years and length of follow-up was 7.2 months. Twenty-two women (88%) had the IPG placed during a Stage 2 procedure. Twenty patients maintained at least a 50% improvement in clinical symptoms at last follow-up and 6 patients were continent. Overall, the number of pads/day improved from 4.2 to 1.1 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in response to neuromodulation based upon age, duration of symptoms, type of surgery, or urodynamic parameters. CONCLUSION: Sacral neuromodulation appears to be an effective therapy in patients with refractory urge incontinence following urogynecological surgery. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess the durability of this therapeutic modality.     

女性尿道括约肌控尿和压力性尿失禁发病的机制

女性尿道括约肌控尿机制和压力性尿失禁发病机理的研究经历了长期和曲折的过程,目前认为,女性尿道括约肌是由尿道横纹肌括约肌、尿道平滑肌括约肌和尿道固有膜等结构,共同参与组成的一个构造精细而有序的尿道括约肌复合体或称尿道括约肌系统.压力性尿失禁的发生主要与尿道括约肌本身解剖结构和功能缺陷,以及尿道周围附属结构和支撑结构缺陷有关.     

Management of post-midurethral sling voiding dysfunction. International Urogynecological Association research and development committee opinion

Voiding dysfunction following midurethral sling procedures is not a rare event. There is no current consensus regarding management of this complication. Although it is often transient and self-limiting, chronic post-midurethral sling voiding dysfunction may lead to irreversible changes affecting detrusor function. Initial management includes intermittent catheterization, and addressing circumstantial factors interfering with normal voiding, such as pain. Early sling mobilization often resolves the dysfunction, and is associated with minimal morbidity. Sling incision or excision at a later stage, although fairly effective, could be associated with recurrence of stress urinary incontinence. There is insufficient evidence to justify urethral dilatation in this context.     

The association between diabetes mellitus and urinary incontinence in adult women

Introduction and hypothesis  The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship of diabetes mellitus and urinary incontinence in adult women. Methods  We conducted a cross-sectional, comparative study with a case-control design. One thousand three hundred eighty-one women (aged 20–87 years) attending six Primary Healthcare Centers in Turkey were enrolled in this study, after giving their informed consent. Subjects were dichotomized into cases and controls according to presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and were matched for the confounding factors age, body mass index (BMI), and reproductive history. Results  Nine hundred ten women were included: 273 diabetics and 637 non-diabetics. Diabetes was shown to be associated with a 2.5-fold risk increase for urinary incontinence (UI), and age and BMI were weakly associated with UI. UI was significantly more prevalent in diabetic women: 41% diabetic and 22.1% non-diabetic women reported UI (p < 0.001). Age, BMI, and DM were revealed as independent determinants of UI in adult women. Urge incontinence was more prevalent in non-diabetic women, whereas stress and mixed incontinence were more prevalent among diabetic women. Conclusions  DM is the most important independent determinant of UI.     

女性尿失禁患者应对方式量表的编制及信效度检验

目的编制女性尿失禁患者应对方式量表,为我国女性尿失禁患者的应对方式提供定量测评工具。方法结合文献回顾分析和半结构式访谈形成量表初始条目池,通过咨询相关专家并对部分条目进行修改,最终确定28个条目,3个维度的量表初稿。选取济南市某社区246例女性尿失禁患者进行现场调查。结果量表条目具有较好的区分度,探索性因素分析得到3个因子:预防性应对方式、掩饰性应对方式和治疗性应对方式,累积贡献率为51.749%,其Cronbach′sα系数分别是0.862,0.718和0.711,总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.778。结论女性尿失禁患者应对方式量表具有较好的信效度,可用于我国女性尿失禁患者应对方式的定量测评。     

Solifenacin: as effective in mixed urinary incontinence as in urge urinary incontinence

Patients with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) are frequently treated with antimuscarinic therapy, despite little data being previously published for this patient group. We present a subgroup analysis of patients with overactive bladder syndrome, assessing the efficacy of once-daily solifenacin succinate in patients with MUI (n=1041) or urge urinary incontinence (UUI; n=1648) only. A greater proportion of patients receiving solifenacin achieved resolution of incontinence in both the MUI and UUI groups (MUI: 5 mg=43%, 10 mg=49%; UUI: 5 mg=55%, 10 mg=54%) compared with patients receiving placebo (MUI 33%, UUI 35%). Baseline to endpoint improvements in all other symptoms were statistically significant vs placebo for both solifenacin doses in both cohorts. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the MUI and UUI cohorts. This analysis shows that once-daily solifenacin was as effective and well tolerated in patients with MUI as in patients with UUI.     

Urodynamic characteristics of mixed urinary incontinence and idiopathic urge urinary incontinence

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical and urodynamic findings in patients with either mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) or simple urge urinary incontinence (UUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 100 consecutive female patients with MUI and UUI were identified from a database. Patients with neurogenic bladder, fistula, urethral diverticulum, prior urologic surgery or known urinary tract obstruction were excluded. All patients were classified according to the urodynamic classification of overactive bladder of Flisser et al. and all patients underwent history, physical examination, validated incontinence questionnaire, 24-hour voiding diary, 24-hour pad test, video urodynamic study (VUDS), and cystoscopy. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients with UUI exhibited detrusor overactivity at VUDS, (67% of the patients with UUI vs. 24% of the MUI, P < 0.05). Patients with UUI had fewer episodes of incontinence (6.7 vs. 4.2, P < 0.05) with slightly less objective urine loss (24-hour pad test 94 gm vs. 128 g of loss, P < 0.05) and voided at higher pressures (p(det) at Q(max) 21.4 vs. 15.6 cm H(2)O, P < 0.05). Patients in both groups had functional and urodynamic bladder capacities that were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Women with UUI were more likely to exhibit detrusor overactivity but experienced fewer episodes of incontinence and less urinary loss when compared with women who had MUI. The "urge incontinence" component of MUI appears to be different than that of UUI, and suggests that urge incontinence may be overdiagnosed in patients with SUI who misinterpret their fear of leaking (because of SUI) for urge incontinence.     

Mixed incontinence: Stressing about urge

Urgency and urinary urge incontinence are troublesome and complex symptoms that can complicate the diagnosis and treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Despite this fact, first-line intervention frequently is directed toward the incompetent bladder neck using surgical approaches. Persistent urgency or detrusor instability following anti-incontinence surgery reduces patient satisfaction and overall continence in most series. This article discusses current theories explaining the etiology of mixed incontinence. It also reviews the results of anti-incontinence surgery for mixed incontinence and discusses management strategies. Possible predictors of outcome after sling surgery in this complex group of patients also are presented.