Comparison of quality of life and psychological distress in patients with tongue cancer undergoing a total/subtotal glossectomy or extended hemiglossectomy and free flap transfer: a prospective evaluation

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the quality of life and psychological distress of patients with tongue cancer undergoing total/subtotal glossectomy (TG) or extended hemiglossectomy (HG) and free flap transfer. Differences between the two groups were compared using the Short Form 8-Item Health Survey (SF-8) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Of the 43 patients with tongue cancer, 24 (56%) underwent TG and 19 (44%) underwent HG. The general health and social functioning scores in the SF-8 and depression in the HADS were significantly worse in the TG group than in the HG group at 12 months after surgery, indicating that patients in the TG group may experience social isolation and psychological distress, and have difficulty in employability even 12 months after surgery. In contrast, all items of the SF-8 in the HG group were nearly equal to those in the general population. Due to the extensive psychological impact on patients with tongue cancer who are planned for an extended resection, curative surgery with free flap transfer and multidisciplinary psychiatric support are essential to improve quality of life and manage psychological distress.     

Head and neck cancer: to what extent can psychological factors explain differences between health-related quality of life and individual quality of life?

AIMS: To assess the extent to which individualised quality of life (QoL) was related to standardised health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and to assess how much of the variation in each of these measures could be explained by psychological variables. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer completed the following outcome measures: the Patient Generated Index (PGI), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2). Explanatory factors were measured with the following: the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R), the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Brief COPE (a shortened version of the COPE). MAIN FINDINGS: Standardised and individualised QoL measures were correlated only partly. The PGI correlated only with EORTC QLQ-C30 domains of emotional and cognitive functioning and SF-12 domains of mental health, emotional role, social, and physical role. The underlying psychological factors explaining each of the three outcome measures were different. CONCLUSIONS: Respondent-generated measures such as the PGI could be used as an adjunct to more standardised measures of HR-QoL clinically. This has implications for assessing the impact of head and neck cancer on individualised QoL and also for improving patients' outcome through interventions aimed at targeting underlying psychological factors.     

The prevalence of psychological distress in a sample of facial trauma victims. A comparative cross-sectional study between UK and Australia

Aim

The potential psycho-social sequelae of traumatic facial injury have received increasing attention in recent years, however there remains paucity of cross-national comparative data on the prevalence of psychological distress following such trauma. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the prevalence of anxiety and depression in an adult patient group who have been treated for maxillofacial trauma, and who attend a follow-up clinic in either the West Midlands, UK or New South Wales (NSW), Australia. By using an identical methodological and statistical approach, we hoped to add to the available information on the incidence of early psychological distress in patients following facial trauma.

Method

This was a comparative cross-sectional study. A sample of fifty consecutive adult victims of facial trauma in the West Midlands UK, was compared to a group of fifty-two facially injured patients in NSW, Australia. Demographic data was collected, following which the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS) were applied to both groups of patients.

Results

Psychometric scores suggestive of anxiety and depressive state were common in both groups of patients. The mean HADS depression subscale score for UK patients compared to Australian patients was not significantly different (5.94 versus 5.54 p = 0.62). This was also the case for the HADS anxiety subscale (5.96 versus 5.94 p = 0.98). Although the number of patients achieving scores suggestive of a ‘caseness’ for co-morbid psychological state was higher within the UK sample when compared to the Australian group (20% versus 11.5% for HADS depression subscale, and 20% versus 15% for HADS anxiety subscales respectively); these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

This cross-national comparative study has shown that anxiety and depression in facial trauma victims were comparable in both settings.     

Health-related quality of life in Nigerian patients with facial trauma and controls: a preliminary survey

We examined the health-related quality of life (HR QoL) of patients with facial trauma and compared it with that of healthy controls; temporal changes in HR QoL of patients over 12 weeks compared with baseline values; and whether the risk of depression could be identified by baseline HR QoL. For 26 months we recruited 126 consecutive patients with facial injuries and 126 age and sex-matched healthy controls for the study. Enrollment criteria included age 18 years and over, Glasgow coma scale score on admission of 12 and over, and duration of stay of more than 24 hours. HR QoL was measured using the 26-item World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO QoL-Bref), and depression was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores in all domains of the WHO QoL-Bref (physical, psychological, social relations, and environment) were considerably reduced in injured patients compared with controls. During follow up there were improvements only in the domains of physical health and environment, but not in psychological health. There was a significant reduction in the HR QoL domain of social relationships with time. The regression equation for all four QoL domains as predictors was significantly related to depression scores throughout the study period. Patients with facial injuries are at risk of poor QoL after trauma. There was a high incidence of depression throughout the follow-up period, and poor QoL at baseline predicted depression during follow-up.     

Psychological outcome of patients following treatment of oral cancer and its relation with functional status and coping mechanisms

BACKGROUND: Traditionally health-care providers have measured outcome of treatment of disease by focusing on tumour response and disease-free survival. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the behavioural and functional impact of treatment on the patient is important. This study investigates the psychological outcome and its relationship with functional status and coping mechanisms following treatment of oral cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were evaluated 6 months to 6 years after treatment (from October 1992 to October 1997) for oral cancer. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used for psychological evaluation, the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) and The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for evaluating the head and neck specific and general functional status, respectively. Finally, the "Mental Adjustment to Cancer Questionnaire" (MAC-Q) was used for evaluation of coping mechanisms. RESULTS: The incidence of anxiety and/or depression was 25% and the socio-demographic and medical characteristics showed poor correlation with the psychological outcome in this study. The results indicated that there was a strong association between psychological outcome and head and neck specific and general quality-of-life (QOL) domains, and style of coping. The p-value was less than 0.01 for most of the domains and items of functional status and the effective coping style. CONCLUSION: Deteriorated functional status and ineffective coping strategies are strongly associated with poor psychological outcome in patients with oral cancer.     

Perioperative assessment of psychological state and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgery

This study assessed psychological state and quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer patients during the perioperative period. Patients who had undergone primary surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan were enrolled. After obtaining informed consent, three tests were administered: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess psychological state, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) to assess QOL. Japanese language versions of all tests were administered. Tests were administered 1 day before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 1 and 6 months after discharge. Test scores were analyzed, as were relationships between psychological state, QOL and clinical factors. Anxiety was greatest before surgery, while depression was greatest immediately after surgery. QOL in the somatic and specific domains also decreased immediately after surgery. QOL in most domains improved 1 month after discharge. This study offers important information regarding perioperative psychological state and QOL in head and neck cancer patients.     

Higher distress relates to poor quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer

Cancers of the head and neck are unique because they may interfere with speech, swallowing, breathing and taste. This study investigated the effect of distress on quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing treatment and looked at the predictors of distress. 123 patients with head and neck cancer undergoing multimodal treatment were interviewed using the distress inventory for cancer version 2 (DIC2) and the functional assessment of cancer treatment Head Neck (FACT-HN) questionnaire. Nearly half of the patients had early, node negative (N0) disease. The mean distress score was 24.6 and the mean FACT-HN score was 114.5. There was a negative correlation between distress and quality of life scores (patients with higher distress had poor quality of life). Neither surgery nor chemotherapy affected distress or quality of life. Multivariate analysis identified education, occupation, tumor and nodal stage as predictors of distress. Tumor and nodal status influenced overall quality of life. High amounts of distress lead to poor quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. Financial security, understanding and support from the partner reduced distress in these patients.     

An investigation of psychological distress in patients who have been treated for head and neck cancer

There is now ample evidence that psychological distress is common in patients with head and neck cancer and that psychology has a role in reducing this distress. In this study, the prevalence, nature, and correlates of distress were investigated, in 18 patients who were no longer being actively treated but were attending a follow-up clinic or support group (n= 9 each). Four of the patients had appreciable psychological distress and four each had anxiety or depression of at least borderline importance. The degree of depression and distress decreased with increasing age and there were trends for depression to decrease with time after the onset of the illness and to be slightly less common among those attending the support group (2/9 compared to 4/9). Numerous psychosocial difficulties were reported and perceptions of support available from friends and family were mixed. There are implications for services, and in particular, patients need to be given clear information about the resources available to give them psychosocial support.     

Psychological distress in patients with head and neck cancer: review

Cancer of the head and neck is common. Both the disease and its treatment are associated with considerable psychological distress. Here, I review factors that affect psychological adjustment, describe screening instruments that are used to measure anxiety and depression in cancer, and make recommendations for the early detection, management, and reduction of the distress associated with cancer of the head and neck.     

Prediction of post-treatment trismus in head and neck cancer patients

Our aim was to establish the incidence of trismus over time, together with risk factors (including quality of life (QoL)) for the prediction of trismus after treatment in patients with cancer of the head and neck. It was a longitudinal study of 152 patients accepted for primary operation who attended the head and neck cancer clinic of a tertiary referral cancer centre in the United Kingdom. A total of 87 patients was studied prospectively. Our results showed that 41/87 (47%) of patients presented with trismus, 57/80 (71%) had postoperative trismus, and 41/52 (79%) had trismus 6 months after operation or radiotherapy (trismus defined as a maximum mouth opening of ≤ 35 mm). Men and those who drank a lot of alcohol were less likely to have trismus after treatment. QoL variables showed that pain, eating, chewing, taste, saliva, social functioning, social contact, and dry mouth were significantly more impaired in the trismus group than among those without trismus. Postoperative differences in QoL between the two groups highlighted problems with social function and role-playing, fatigue, activity, recreation, and overall reduction in QoL. Women, and those who do not drink alcohol, are at particularly high risk of developing trismus, and, to prevent it and treat it, patients may benefit from multidisciplinary management at an early stage during treatment.     

Functional status of patients with oral cancer and its relation to style of coping, social support and psychological status

Sixty-eight patients were evaluated 6 months to 6 years after treatment for oral cancer using standardized questionnaires to explore the influence of age, sex, site and stage of tumour, and primary treatment on their functional status measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QoL), and the association between functional status and psychological outcome measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), style of coping measured by the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Questionnaire (MAC-Q), and social support measured by the Short-Form Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ-6). Young patients, women, patients with advanced tumours, those with oropharyngeal tumours and those who had been treated with both surgery and radiotherapy reported worse function. The worse the functional domain, the more likely it was to be associated with anxiety, depression and ineffective coping style, and better functional scores were weakly associated with fighting spirit, level of social support and satisfaction with that support. We have identified patients at need and highlighted their problems. Dealing with these problems may ultimately improve the perception of function after treatment of oral cancer.     

口腔癌患者的心理困扰及生存质量研究

目的: 探讨口腔癌患者的心理现状及其影响因素,以及与生存质量相关的因素。方法: 使用心理困扰温度计（distress themometer,DT）和华盛顿大学生存质量量表（University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire,UW-QOL）对郑州大学第一附属医院2016年10月—2017年9月收治的250例口腔癌患者进行问卷调查。应用SPSS20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 发放问卷250份,实际回收有效问卷239份。在239例口腔癌患者中,DT分数≥4分139例（58.2%）,UWQOL量表平均得分53.3±17.1;<4分的患者100例（41.8%）,UWQOL量表平均得分52.8±17.4,DT总平均得分4.56±2.18。单因素分析结果显示,心理困扰与年龄、文化程度、收入水平、病理分期、颌骨切除、复发6个因素有关（χ²值分别为5.12、21.31、34.2、10.69、31.3和7.84,P<0.05）。Logistic回归分析显示,年龄、颌骨切除、复发是影响口腔癌患者心理困扰的危险因素（OR值分别为4.06、5.12和5.79,P<0.05）。Spearman相关分析显示,UWQOL量表中疼痛、娱乐、情绪、焦虑4个条目得分与心理困扰得分呈负相关（r分别为-0.58、-0.84、-0.66和-0.69,P<0.05）。结论: 口腔癌患者的心理困扰发生率较高;年龄越小、做过颌骨切除、复发的患者心理困扰程度更严重。对口腔癌患者施行个体化的治疗方案、术后护理及心理疏导,可能会减轻患者的心理困扰程度。     

Prospective evaluation of psychological burden in patients with oral cancer

The high morbidity and mortality that is associated with oral cancer places a huge psychological burden on patients. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, at three time points using DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21). We also compared DASS-21 with HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). A total of 111 patients were enrolled and 75 of them completed the questionnaires at diagnosis, one month after treatment, and three months after discharge. Scores were high for stress at diagnosis, and for depression at the other time points, but were low for anxiety at all three. The results of Friedman’s ANOVA showed that mean ranks for depression and stress were significant (p < 0.05). Scores for depression and stress rose significantly between diagnosis and three months after operation, but those for anxiety (which had increased between diagnosis and operation p > 0.05), were stable three months postoperatively. The DASS-21 was a useful method of evaluating stress. Correlation of the results from the two questionnaires showed a strongly positive association. We therefore recommend psychological intervention to improve overall outcome.     

Quality of life in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer

Quality of life (QoL) is an important aspect in the clinical assessment and management of patients with cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate QoL at the time of diagnosis in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer and to establish the influence of variables such as gender, age, tumor location and tumor staging. The authors studied 149 patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer for 2 years. QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its specific modules for head and neck cancer QLQ-H&N 35. Variable deterioration of QoL was observed before therapy. The emotional domain showed the greatest alterations, while pain was the most remarkable symptom variable. QoL seems to be associated with gender (female patients obtained worse scores in most of the functional scales), age (patients < 65 years scored better), tumor location (orpharyngeal tumors showed worse prognosis) and tumor staging (early stages obtained better scores than advances ones). Many patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer show poor QoL before initiating treatment. The present study of a homogeneous group of patients is the first carried out in Spain following the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and its results may serve for future reference. These results are similar to those obtained in populations from the north and centre of Europe.     

Mitchell–Hoole–Kanatas (MHK) questionnaire: the first to measure patient-reported outcomes relating to problems with intimacy after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used by clinical teams as indicators of quality when assessing treatment after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. About a third of patients report reduced sexual interest or enjoyment after such treatment but, despite that, there is no questionnaire about intimacy that has been developed specifically for them. The aim of this study was to develop such a questionnaire, to gain an indication of the relative incidence of individual items, and to compare characteristics such as age, stage, treatment, time since treatment for an established head and neck cancer, and a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 with the Head and Neck 35 module). The development of the new instrument was based on an exploratory observational study that included quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative element was achieved by the generation of items - from published studies, the comments of patients and carers, and a cross-sectional survey of patients with head and neck cancer who were alive and free of disease. The quantitative element comprised analysis of exploratory and confirmatory factors, internal reliability assessment (Cronbach’s alpha), and a correlation analysis. Forty-two patients were included in the focus groups, and 101 patients participated in the cross-sectional survey (both male and female, in a relationship and single, age range 30–70 years for the focus group, and 62–117 in the cross-sectional survey). All treatments were included. We found that the ability to enjoy a sex life had been adversely affected in about half the sample and that this had significantly changed from before their cancer in a third. The qualitative part of the study resulted in 22 items that covered a range of domains from dry mouth and thick saliva to loss of sensation (lips, fingertips), restricted head/neck movement, fatigue, and pain. The exploratory analysis covered four domains (physical, sensation, movement, and communication) from 12 of 22 items. Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.62 to 0.84, and the correlation analysis indicated “good fit” statistics for these domains. In terms of the EORTC QoL Questionnnaire – Head and Neck 35, the four MHK domains showed good levels of association with anticipated domains. Head and neck cancer and its associated treatments significantly adversely affect intimacy and sexuality in half the population sampled. The MHK tool may be used to identify specific issues related to intimacy in patients with a history of diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer. Further work is essential to identify its precise role and to help develop specific interventions.     

Prospective evaluation of quality of life after oncologic surgery for oral cancer

The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing surgical therapy for cancer of the lower region of the oral cavity (floor of the mouth and adjacent regions such as the tongue, alveolus, buccal sulcus, and oropharynx). A total of 83 patients were enrolled into the study. QoL was assessed using the core questionnaire and the head and neck module of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC H&N35). The questionnaires were distributed to the patients preoperatively on the day of hospital admission and 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The changes in the scores were tested longitudinally for statistical significance using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of gender, tumour stage, and prognosis (recurrent disease/non-survival) were tested at the individual intervals additionally by ANOVA procedures. Results showed that surgical treatment of oral cancer of the floor of the mouth led to a temporary deterioration of physical function and role function 3 months after surgery. These changes were accompanied by a significant decrease in oral function with reduced body image and reduced ability and willingness for social contact. The levels of these scores improved until the end of the first year after treatment. Pain, emotional function and the feeling of being ill constantly improved during 1 year. Patients with advanced stage of the disease (Stages III and IV) showed lower values in role function, social function, pain- and site-specific effects such as swallowing and nutritional aspects.     

Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Associated Predictors in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectivesTo investigate levels of quality of life (QoL) and determine associated predictors in patients with oral lichen planus (OLP).Materials and methodsA total of 300 patients with OLP at one tertiary Oral Medicine clinic in the UK were recruited in a cross-sectional study from January 2018 to July 2019. The 15-item Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ-15) and 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) were used to assess the level of QoL related to OLP. A number of potential determinants were considered, including patient demographics, treatment, the severity of oral symptoms, the clinical activity of the disease, and the patient psychological status, which were measured using the pain-Numerical Rating Scale, the Oral Disease Severity Score, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Multivariate linear regression was employed to identify independent determinants associated with overall and aspects of QoL.ResultsOn multivariate analyses, after adjusting for confounding variables, the QoL levels in patients with OLP were significantly associated with levels of oral pain, anxiety, stress and use of topical corticosteroids. The COMDQ-15 instrument performed better than OHIP-14 at capturing the association between QoL and pain and disease activity in patients with OLP.ConclusionClinicians should expect reduced QoL in OLP patients with high pain levels, high anxiety levels, high perceived stress and use of topical corticosteroids. The COMDQ-15 is best suited to measure QoL in this population.     

The impact of treatment for head and neck cancer on positive psychological change within a year of completing treatment

Head and neck cancer carries a high level of morbidity and mortality. So why could anyone find having such a disease a positive event? The adversity hypothesis of “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger” suggests that people can use adversity to develop as human beings. This positive psychological change has received little attention in relation to head and neck cancer. Responses to the Silver Lining Questionnaire, University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Short-Form 12 were collected from a postal survey, 3 to 12 months after the completion of treatment for head and neck cancer. Fifty-two (63%) people returned the survey and were included in the analysis. Time since completion of therapy did not show any relationship with positive psychological change. Tumour stage and treatment regimen both had a relationship with positive change. Participants with lower stage tumours had higher levels of positive change than those with tumours of higher stages. Participants who had surgery alone reported more positive change than those who had surgery with radiotherapy. A social factor related to greater change was being married or living with a partner when compared to living alone. Further research would aid the identification of bio-psychosocial factors that influence the development of positive psychological change and inform the development of rehabilitation interventions.     

Preliminary study of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory-11: validation for patients with head and neck cancer

Background Cancer involves numerous physical, psychological and emotional changes and has a negative impact on patients. Although there are a wide variety of questionnaires for general use in patients with cancer, very few are available that assess the pain, disability and craniomandibular functionality of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in a more specific manner. The purpose of this study is to present the preliminary behavior of the CF-PDI in its reduced version adapted for patients with HNC.Material and Methods A total of 61 patients with HNC were included in a study to preliminarily analyze the internal consistency of the instrument, the convergent validity and the floor and ceiling effects. All the patients completed the informed consent document and a battery of 5 questionnaires: The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with HNC (QLQ-HN) and the reduced version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI-11). Patients also performed 2 physical tests: measurements of the pain threshold on the masseter muscle and on the distal phalanx of the first finger; and the maximum mouth opening in neutral head position.Results Cronbach''s α coefficient showed a very high internal consistency of 0.92. In terms of convergent validity, a statistically significant correlation was found between the CF-PDI-11 and the following variables: NRS, TSK-TMD, PCS, QLQ-HN, the threshold of pain in the distal phalanx of the first finger and the maximum interincisal opening. However, 21.3% of patients obtained the lowest possible score. The strongest correlation was found between the CF-PDI-11 and the QLQ-HN (r = 0.85, p <0.01).Conclusions The preliminary version of the CF-PDI-11 shows that it could be a valid and reliable instrument to measure pain, disability and quality of life in patients with HNC. Key words:Questionnaire, psychometric validation, head and neck cancer, pain, disability.     

Predictors of distress associated with altered appearance and function in people treated surgically for oral cancers: a cross-sectional study

This cross-sectional study was performed to examine sources of variation in distress associated with altered appearance and fundamental functions in oral cancer patients at 2 months, 12–15 months, 24–36 months, and ≥ 5 years post-definitive treatment. Eligible patients completed six scales from the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module. Pre-specified regression models were used to examine sources of variation in study outcomes for 145 patients. Patient self-reports indicated that distress associated with altered appearance and fundamental functions was highly variable, and distress was present beyond 5 years post-definitive treatment in some patients. Associations between distress scores and time post-definitive treatment, reconstructive surgery, and adjuvant therapy were not statistically significant. There was, however, moderate to strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no association between eating distress scores and sex, primary cancer site, and T-stage; smiling distress scores and age and primary cancer site; appearance distress scores and geographical remoteness and primary cancer site; and speaking distress scores and primary cancer site. Primary cancer site was the only significant independent predictor of multiple distress scores. These findings suggest that predicting the psychological impact of oral cancer treatment remains a challenge for the multidisciplinary team. Screening and interventions for psychological distress are essential beyond the preoperative and acute care settings.