Short lingual osteotomy without fixation: a new strategy for mandibular osteotomy known as “physiological positioning”

We describe the strategy of physiological positioning, which we regard as a new alternative treatment to conventional orthognathic operations, and treated 18 patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism using it. The positions of SNB, FMA, and Me were measured postoperatively to assess skeletal stability, changes in the angle and perpendicular length of the upper and lower central incisors were measured to assess dental stability, and we confirmed that both skeletal and dental stability were excellent. The width to which the jaw could be opened recovered early, and we saw only one case of disorder of the temporomandibular joint. Short lingual osteotomy with physiological positioning is an effective new approach to the treatment of deformities of the mandible.     

Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy) for open bite with skeletal class III deformity

IntroductionThis study evaluated postoperative stability after Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy, first reported by Obwegeser 1973) for severe open bite with mandibular prognathism.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study reviewed 20 consecutive patients who underwent only mandibular Obwegeser II osteotomy to correct open bite and mandibular prognathism. Lateral cephalograms were evaluated preoperatively (T1), immediate postoperatively (T2) and at least 6 months after the surgery (T3). Surgical and postsurgical changes in cephalometric measurements were evaluated statistically.ResultsOpen bite with skeletal class III malocclusion was corrected by the Obwegeser II osteotomy alone. After an average of 9.9 ± 5.2 mm of mandibular setback with open bite closure (T2–T1, over-bite change, 5.7 ± 2.4 mm) by counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible, the patients showed 0.8 ± 1.7 mm of horizontal relapse (p > 0.05), 1.1 ± 1.7 mm of vertical relapse at the B point (p = 0.011) and −0.2 ± 1.6 mm of over-bite change postoperatively (T3–T2).DiscussionWith the adequate control of the condylar position with rigid internal fixation, Obwegeser II osteotomy showed acceptable stability after the correction of open bite with mandibular prognathism without a simultaneous maxillary osteotomy. An isolated Obwegeser II osteotomy can be considered a reliable option in cases with moderate to severe open bite with mandibular prognathism when the maxillary osteotomy is not needed if the patients have a well-positioned maxilla.     

双侧下颌骨升支矢状劈开截骨术治疗下颌前突畸形

目的探讨口内进路双侧下颌骨升支矢状劈开截骨后退小钛板内固定治疗重度下颌前突畸形的临床疗效。方法9例上颌骨发育正常、下颌骨真性前突、严重反He关系的患者，行术前牙齿正畸治疗后，采用口内进路双侧下颌骨升支矢状劈开截骨后退小钛板内固定，术后正畸治疗，恢复尖窝咬He关系。结果所有病例均取得满意的疗效，获得协调的上下颌骨关系，术后随访1年，未见下颌前突复发。结论重度下颌前突畸形采用口内进路双侧下颌骨升支矢状劈开截骨术及正畸治疗是有效的，值得临床推广应用。     

Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Asymmetric mandibular prognathism is a clinically common skeletal dentomaxillofacial deformity. Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO) is an effective alternative procedure to bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) for some patients. However, the biomechanical effect of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of USSRO has not been fully studied. This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution changes in the TMJ of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO/USSRO, to validate the clinical feasibility of USSRO. Nineteen patients with mandibular prognathism patients who were treated with BSSRO (n = 12) and USSRO (n = 7) had preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scanning. Preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) of functional TMJ movements were made on one BSSRO patient and one USSRO patient. In all patients, the ANB angle and mandibular deviation were significantly improved postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative ANB angle and mandibular deviation between the BSSRO group and the USSRO group. In two preoperative FEA models, the maximum stresses of non-deviation side TMJ structures were greater than the deviation side during functional movements. The unbalanced stress distribution was corrected postoperatively in both BSSRO/USSRO FE models. Both BSSRO/USSRO can improve the ANB angle and mandibular deviation. The bilateral TMJ structure in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism had unbalanced stress, which could be significantly improved with the USSRO as effectively as BSSRO.     

Le FortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形

目的：探讨Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开（Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy）上颌骨整体后退术在矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形中的价值。方法：对16例骨性Ⅱ类上颌前突患者（上颌骨前突伴下颌骨后缩14例,其中同时伴颏后缩6例;单纯上颌骨前突2例）进行外科-正畸联合治疗。患者治疗前头影测量∠ANB为7.0°～13.1°,平均9.3°。行Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术,其中14例同期行双侧下颌支矢状骨劈开术（bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy,BSSRO）前移下颌骨,6例行颏成形术（genioplasty）前移颏部。结果：本组行LeFortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退4～8mm,14例BSSRO下颌骨前移4～7mm,6例颏成形术颏前移6～8mm。1例一侧腭降动脉术中损伤断裂,经结扎处理,无感染及骨块坏死。16例患者伤口均一期愈合。术后及正畸结束后∠ANB为1.6°～3.5°,平均2.9°。结束治疗后随访6～24个月,牙弓形态及[牙合]曲线正常,牙排列整齐,咬合关系良好,外形明显改善,疗效满意。结论：对于骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形患者,Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术是一种安全、合理、有效的正颌外科术式。     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Relapse following mandibular advancement with dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation

This study examines the short-term stability of the mandible following mandibular advancement surgery in which skeletal suspension wires were used in addition to dental maxillomandibular fixation. Twenty adults underwent sagittal ramus osteotomies. No concomitant surgical procedures were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation consisted of wiring between the upper and lower orthodontic brackets and circummandibular wires connected to the piriform aperture or anterior nasal spine wires for eight weeks. Cephalograms were analyzed during this period to evaluate skeletal stability. A statistically insignificant mean horizontal relapse of 8.9% was found at pogonion during the period of fixation. Significant vertical intrusion of the anterior mandible occurred, however, with a mean superior movement of pogonion of 0.83 mm (P less than or equal to 0.05). Dental changes noted were uprighting of the maxillary incisors and flaring of the mandibular incisors. In comparison with the results of other studies in which dental maxillomandibular fixation was used alone, the results of this study indicate that the use of skeletal suspension wires is advantageous in the prevention of horizontal skeletal relapse.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess if there were any differences between resorbable plate and screws and titanium rigid fixation of the maxilla. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two Class III patients had bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback stabilized with rigid internal fixation. Low level Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement was stabilized with conventional titanium plate and screws in 12 patients (group 1) and with resorbable plate and screws in 10 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Before surgery both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary stability was excellent in both groups. In group 1 no significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at A point and posterior nasal spine. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed. CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure for maxillary advancements up to 5 mm independently from the type of fixation used to stabilize the maxilla. Resorbable devices should be used with caution for bony movements of greater magnitude until their usefulness is evaluated in studies with large maxillary advancements.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: A comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques

This study examines the short-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following Le Fort I impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular advancement using two standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Fifteen adults had skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation, and fifteen adults had rigid internal fixation using bone plates in the maxilla and bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments in the mandible. The group with rigid internal fixation did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms were analyzed during the postsurgical period to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. There was no statistical difference in postsurgical stability with rigid internal fixation or skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation other than the vertical position of the maxillary molar; the skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation group had a significant amount of postsurgical intrusion of the maxillary molar when compared with the rigid internal fixation group. Although the other measures showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups, the amount of variability in postsurgical stability in the group with skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation was greater than that found in the group with rigid internal fixation.     

Changes in border movement of the mandible in skeletal Class III before and after orthognathic surgery

The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in border movement of the mandible before and after mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with prognathism. The subjects were 73 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Border movement of the mandible was recorded with a mandibular movement measure system (K7) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Of the 73 patients, 21 had measurements taken at 1.5 years postoperative. Data were compared between the pre- and postoperative states, and the differences analyzed statistically. There was no significant difference between SSRO alone and SSRO with Le Fort I osteotomy in the time-course change. The values at 6 months postoperative were significantly lower than the preoperative values for maximum vertical opening (P = 0.0066), maximum antero-posterior movement from the centric occlusion (P = 0.0425), and centric occlusion to maximum opening (P = 0.0300). However, there were no significant differences between the preoperative and 1.5 years postoperative measurements. This study suggests that a postoperative temporary reduction in the border movement of the mandible could recover by 1.5 years postoperative, and the additional procedure of a Le Fort I osteotomy does not affect the recovery of mandibular motion after SSRO.     

Long-term skeletal stability in the treatment of mandibular prognathism with a physiological positioning strategy

Our aim was to evaluate the long-term skeletal stability of the mandible in 21 patients after orthognathic surgery with physiological positioning. The measurement points SNB, B point (X, Y), Pog (X, Y), and the angle of the ramus were measured on cephalometric photographs to assess skeletal stability preoperatively, immediately after operation, and one and two years postoperatively. In addition, we evaluated the clinical symptoms of disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The analysis of the cephalometric photographs showed that SNB, B point X, and Pog X showed no significant differences among the postoperative time points. On the other hand, B point Y and Pog Y showed no significant differences throughout the study period. We compared the angle of the ramus before operation and two years postoperatively, and no significant difference was found. In addition, no cases showed any pathological symptoms of disorders of the TMJ two years postoperatively. The long-term stability after orthognathic surgery with physiological positioning was confirmed, and it seems to be a reliable orthognathic treatment in patients with mandibular prognathism.     

Stability of the mandible following advancement: a comparison of three postsurgical fixation techniques

This study examines short-term stability of the mandible following mandibular advancement surgery by means of three standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Twenty-two adult female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) underwent sagittal ramus advancement osteotomy of approximately 4 to 6 mm. Six animals had dental maxillomandibular fixation alone. Six animals had dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with circummandibular wires connected to pyriform aperture wires. Ten animals had rigid internal fixation with bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments without maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms with the aid of tantalum bone markers and dental amalgams were analyzed during the first 6 postoperative weeks to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. Rigid internal fixation and the use of dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation were both equally effective in the prevention of postsurgical relapse. However, in the animals in which only dental maxillomandibular fixation was used, statistically significant changes (relapse) occurred when compared with either of the other groups.     

Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the skeletal stability between sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. Patients presenting with mandibular prognathism and scheduled for orthognathic surgery were randomized into either the SSRO group or the IVRO group. Changes at B-point were assessed by serial tracing of lateral cephalograms, which were taken preoperatively, and at 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Ninety-eight patients were recruited, with 49 patients in each group. Between 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, there was significantly more surgical relapse in the horizontal direction (anterior movement) in the SSRO group when compared with the IVRO group (1.83 mm (SD 2.91 mm) vs 0.49 mm (SD 2.32 mm); p = 0.019). At 2 years, there was more surgical relapse in the horizontal direction in the SSRO group than in the IVRO group (0.27 mm (SD 0.34 mm) vs 0.10 mm (SD 0.29 mm); p = 0.014). There were also more absolute changes (irrespective of direction) at B-point in the SSRO group than in the IVRO group at postoperative 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (p = 0.016, 0.049, and 0.045, respectively). The amounts of change at B-point as percentages of total mandibular setback were 1.3% and 3.5% in the IVRO group and SSRO group, respectively. There were no differences in vertical changes between the two groups at any time points. In conclusion, the horizontal stability at B-point was shown to be superior in the IVRO group compared with the SSRO group in the correction of mandibular prognathism during the 2-year follow-up. Although the exact clinical importance of this difference is unknown at this time, this possible benefit may be an important key factor when deciding which osteotomy technique to employ for mandibular setback.     

口内路径下颌骨升枝矢状劈开截骨术治疗下颌前突畸形

下颌骨升枝矢状劈开术是目前世界上使用最普遍的矫正下颌骨畸形的手术方法之一。作者采用口内入路下颌骨畸形的手术方法之一。作者采用口内入路下颌骨升枝矢状劈开截骨术治疗下颌骨前突１８２例，其中真性下颌前突１４３例，假性下颌前突３９例。年龄在１５～５８岁之间，平均２４岁。随访６个月～９年。除９例术后畸形复发需再次矫正以外均获满意效果。本文介绍了口内入路下颌骨升枝矢状截骨术的手术过程及注意事项，并着重讨论了其优缺点，可能出现的并发症及处理方法     

Stability of extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: plate fixation versus maxillomandibular/skeletal suspension wire fixation

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 2 groups of mandibular prognathism patients following extraoral oblique vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO). One group (n = 22) received maxillomandibular fixation and skeletal suspension wires (MMF group) for a period of 8 weeks. In the other group (n = 22), the segments were rigidly fixed with plates and the patients were allowed to function immediately after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 5 occasions: immediately presurgical, immediately postsurgical, 8 weeks postsurgical, 6 months postsurgical, and 1 year postsurgical. During the first 8 weeks after surgery, the MMF group demonstrated posterior movement of the mandible, with an increase in mandibular plane angle, shortening of the rami, and dental compensations. Upon release of MMF and skeletal suspension wiring, a small anterior relapse tendency was observed, but the net setback 1 year after surgery was still greater than the actual surgical setback. In the plate fixation group, postoperative changes were mainly in the form of a small anterior relapse tendency in the range of 10% of the surgical setback. The results indicate that the use of plate fixation with VRO, while eliminating the inconvenience for the patient of several weeks of MMF and preventing the early side effects observed in the MMF group, also resulted in a more predictable surgical procedure, with excellent stability 1 year after surgery.     

Evaluation of skeletal stability following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism

This retrospective study was designed to assess skeletal stability after the correction of mandibular prognathism by sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) and intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy (VSO). We used lateral cephalographs of 31 patients taken before, immediately after, and at least one year after the operation. We recorded euclidean distance matrix analysis, linear and angular measurements, and x and y co-ordinates of cephalometric landmarks for each cephalograph. There were no significant differences in extent of the mandibular retrognathia or magnitude of change between the two groups. The main significant changes in both groups were reduction of the total mandibular length, and posterior shifting in the mandible. One year after the operation the main change was the mean forward relapse of 2.5 mm in the SSO group and the mean posterior relapse of 0.5 mm in the VSO group. The difference in skeletal stability between the groups was significant (P< 0.05), and we conclude that VSO is the more effective technique for correcting mandibular prognathism.     

Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative stability of the surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). We retrospectively studied a sample derived from the patients who were treated by the surgery-first approach using a LeFort I osteotomy and IVRO for correction of class III dentofacial deformity from 2008 to 2012. Lateral cephalograms taken preoperatively and 2 days, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively were traced, and the skeletal and dental variables at different time points were analysed. The study sample comprised 37 subjects, mean (SD) age 23 (4) years. The mean (SD) total duration of treatment including postoperative orthodontics was 14 (6) months, and surgical movement of the maxillary A point was 0.75 (1.3) mm anteriorly, and 0.21 (1.79) mm superiorly. The surgical change in the position of the maxillary first molar was 1.01 (1.57) mm superiorly. The mean (SD) movement of mandible was 11.15 (5.4) mm posteriorly at pogonion and 1.02 (1.79) mm inferiorly at menton. There were no significant change in maxillary skeletal variables during the first year postoperative period. The surgical relapse of mandible at pogonion was 0.63 (2.31) mm anteriorly (p = 0.01), however, the relapse in superior direction at menton was 2.86 (1.39) mm with statistical significance (p = 0.01). The total duration of orthodontic treatment with surgery-first was roughly 5 months shorter than conventional preoperative and postoperative orthodontic treatment. The surgery-first approach using IVRO is effective and predictable, and shortens the overall duration of treatment. Anterior relapse of the mandible was less than 1 mm, and increased superior relapse can be compensated for with appropriate preoperative planning to provide a reliable outcome. This study was limited to 12 months’ follow-up, and a long term follow-up study is indicated.     

Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.

AIM: The present study describes an extra-oral approach for subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy using stable fixation for setback of the mandible. The aim was to investigate the incidence of neurosensory disturbances of the mandibular nerve, evaluate facial scar appearance, and assess skeletal stability following the procedure. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with mandibular prognathism were operated upon using the subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy and plate fixation. The patients were followed up for 6 months following surgery. Intra-operative and postoperative complications, neurosensory function, and facial scar characteristics were recorded. Lateral cephalograms were available immediately before operation, and immediately after operation and 6 months postoperatively. Skeletal stability was based on cephalometric assessment. RESULTS: Among the 19 patients operated earliest, neurosensory disturbances were recorded in five individuals at the 6 month follow-up. In the subsequent group of 23 patients, no disturbances were reported. All but two patients were not concerned about the facial scar 6 months postoperatively. Mean anterior relapse at the 6 month follow-up was 0.5 mm, representing 9% of the surgical setback. CONCLUSION: Extra-oral subcondylar oblique ramus osteotomy with plate fixation is a stable procedure with a low incidence of neurosensory disturbances if the osteotomy is placed well behind the mandibular foramen. Facial scar appearance was rarely a matter of concern to the patients.     

Stability of the mandible after advancement and use of dental plus skeletal maxillomandibular fixation: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta

This study examined short-term stability of the mandible following advancement surgery and the use of skeletal suspension wires plus dental maxillomandibular fixation. Twenty-four adult female Macaca mulatta underwent bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and advancement of approximately 6 mm. All animals had dental maxillomandibular fixation secured by bonding the upper and lower teeth together with an orthodontic composite resin. In half of the animals, the use of circummandibular wires connected to pyriform aperture wires were additionally applied. Tantalum bone markers were placed and cephalograms analyzed during the first six postoperative weeks to evaluate skeletal stability. A statistically significant mean horizontal relapse at the mandibular symphysis occurred in the group without the skeletal wires, whereas no relapse occurred in the group with the skeletal wires. A significant difference in the vertical displacement of the anterior mandible occurred, with an inferior movement of the symphysis in the group without skeletal wires, and a superior movement of the symphysis in the group with skeletal wires. The results of this study indicate that the use of skeletal suspension wires is advantageous in the prevention of horizontal and vertical skeletal relapse.     

Anterior skeletal fixation as an adjunct to oblique sliding osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. A cephalometric study

Positional changes of the mandible and upper and lower incisors were studied by means of cephalometric analysis after oblique sliding osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism. In addition to intermaxillary fixation, skeletal fixation between the anterior nasal spine and the chin was used. The patients were followed up for 18 months after surgery. During the fixation period no increase in anterior facial height was observed and at 18 months this had decreased by 2.2 mm. Nevertheless, there was an increase in the mandibular plane angle by 3.8 degrees which mainly occurred during the fixation period. The posterior facial height decreased by 4.0 mm. As to the changes of the incisors these varied between individuals, but the mean values were small. Anterior skeletal fixation prevented increase in anterior facial height and seemed to limit the posterior shortening of the mandible and the extrusion of the mandibular incisors. However, the benefits remained rather limited.