Is Geographic Socioeconomic Disadvantage Associated with the Rate of THA in Medicare-aged Patients?

BackgroundDisparities in THA use may lead to inequitable care. Prior research has focused on disparities based on individual-level and isolated socioeconomic and demographic variables. To our knowledge, the role of composite, community-level geographic socioeconomic disadvantage has not been studied in the United States. As disparities persist, exploring the potential underlying drivers of these inequities may help in developing more targeted recommendations on how to achieve equitable THA use.Questions/purposes(1) Is geographic socioeconomic disadvantage associated with decreased THA rates in Medicare-aged patients? (2) Do these associations persist after adjusting for differences in gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity to hospitals performing THA?MethodsIn a study with a cross-sectional design, using population-based data from five-digit ZIP codes in Maryland, USA, from July 1, 2012 to March 31, 2019, we included all inpatient and outpatient primary THAs performed in individuals 65 years of age or older at acute-care hospitals in Maryland, as reported in the Health Services Cost Review Commission database. This database was selected because it provided the five-digit ZIP code data necessary to answer our study question. We excluded THAs performed for nonelective indications. We examined the annual rate of THA in our study population for each Maryland ZIP code, adjusted for differences across areas in distributions of gender, race, ethnicity, and distance to the nearest hospital performing THAs. Four hundred fourteen ZIP codes were included, with an overall mean ± SD THA rate of 371 ± 243 per 100,000 persons 65 years or older, a rate similar to that previously reported in individuals aged 65 to 84 in the United States. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05.ResultsTHA rates were higher in more affluent areas, with the following mean rates per 100,000 persons 65 years or older: 422 ± 259 in the least socioeconomically disadvantaged quartile, 339 ± 223 in the second-least disadvantaged, 277 ± 179 in the second-most disadvantaged, and 214 ± 179 in the most-disadvantaged quartile (p < 0.001). After adjustment for distributions in gender, race, ethnicity, and hospital proximity, we found that geographic socioeconomic disadvantage was still associated with THA rate. Compared with the least-disadvantaged quartile, the second-least disadvantaged quartile had 63 fewer THAs per 100,000 people (95% confidence interval 12 to 114), the second-most disadvantaged quartile had 136 fewer THAs (95% CI 62 to 211), and the most-disadvantaged quartile had 183 fewer THAs (95% CI 41 to 325).ConclusionGeographic socioeconomic disadvantage may be the underlying driver of disparities in THA use. Although our study does not determine the “correct” rate of THA, our findings support increasing access to elective orthopaedic surgery in disadvantaged geographic communities, compared with prior research and efforts that have studied and intervened on the basis of isolated factors such as race and gender. Increasing access to orthopaedic surgeons in disadvantaged neighborhoods, educating physicians about when surgical referral is appropriate, and educating patients from these geographic communities about the risks and benefits of THA may improve equitable orthopaedic care across neighborhoods. Future studies should explore disparities in rates of appropriate THA and the role of density of orthopaedic surgeons in an area.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.     

Epidural Analgesia in Open Resection of Colorectal Cancer: Is there a Clinical Benefit? A Retrospective Study on 1,470 Patients

Background  

Epidural analgesia (EA) is effective for postoperative pain relief and results in an earlier recovery from postoperative paralytic ileus. This study evaluated the influence of epidural analgesia on the postoperative 30-day mortality and morbidity after open colorectal cancer resection.     

Is Gastric Bypass Associated with More Complications in Patients Weighing >500 lb (>227 kg)?

Background: Increasing weight and BMI are believed to be independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. 25 patients weighing >500 lb (227 kg), mean BMI 78 kg/m² (range 69-97) underwent open RYGBP by a single surgeon over a 3-year period (Group A). Co-morbid conditions included diabetes, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, degenerative joint disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Acute complications in this group were compared with an age and gender matched cohort of patients with similar co-morbidities who underwent the same operation by the same surgeon during the same period (Group B). The study group was also compared with the cumulative data of all patients who underwent the open RYGBP during the same period (Group C, n=253). Comparisons were made for hospital length of stay, ICU days, mortality, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), anastomotic leak, evisceration, and need for postoperative ventilation or reoperation. Results:There was no mortality,evisceration, leaks, or reoperation in the study group and no statistically significant differences between the groups. The incidence of DVT and PE was also not significantly different among the 3 groups.The days on postoperative mechanical ventilation (7 vs 0 vs 0 days), ICU days (0.68 vs 0 vs 0.03 days), and total LOS (4.56 vs 3.04 vs 3.0 days) was greater in the study group and statistically significant. Conclusions: Gastric bypass in patients weighing >500 lb (>227 kg) can be performed safely. A longer LOS, need for ICU stay and mechanical ventilation should be anticipated. Complications in this group were no greater than age-matched controls who weighed <500 lb or when compared with all patients who underwent RYGBP over the 3 years. Super-obese patients should not be discriminated against when considering a surgical option.     

When Is a More Proximal Amputation Needed?

Amputation may be the most appropriate therapy for an ischemic or infected limb, but the level at which to amputate is often difficult to determine. Selecting the appropriate level is crucial when performing an amputation. The goals of surgery are to maintain maximal limb length and ensure successful healing. When more of the foot and limb can be preserved, the chances for rehabilitation are improved. This article reviews how to determine the most appropriate level of amputation.     

Use of Epidural Analgesia in Sigmoidectomy: Is There Any Advantage in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery?

Background

There is no consensus as to the effects of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopy in the context of the Enhanced Recovery Programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcomes after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.

Methods

The use of epidural analgesia was discontinued in elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and substituted by the perioperative administration of systemic lidocaine. Data from patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy between January 2014 and September 2016 was prospectively analysed. Patients with epidural analgesia were compared with patients without, in analgesics administrated postoperatively, length of stay, day of first defecation and mobilisation, and complication and reoperation rates.

Results

A total of 160 patients (male 85; female 75), median age 68 (30–92 years), were included. The groups consisted of 80 patients each. Mean length of stay (5.6 vs. 7.2 days, p?=?0.03) and day of first mobilisation (mean 1.2 vs. 1.6 days, p?=?0.004) were significantly shorter in the group without epidural analgesia. Reoperation rate (7.5 vs. 2.5%) was not statistically different. Complication rate was significantly lower (12.5 vs. 30%, p?=?0.007) in the group without epidural. Day of first defecation was shorter in the epidural group (1.4 vs. 1.7 days, p?=?0.04). Mean amount of analgesics administrated was not statistically different between groups, except for metamizole, that was administrated more in the group without epidural.

Conclusions

Epidural analgesia did not offer benefits on postoperative analgesia or outcomes after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, causing longer length of stay, later mobilisation and higher complication rate.

     

When Are Urodynamics Indicated in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence?

Despite technical and procedural advances in urodynamics over the past decade, the role of urodynamics in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) remains controversial. Many of these advancements have been the result of multicentric studies in the United States, such as the UITN and PFDN, which will be highlighted in this article. It appears to be the consensus that urodynamics may not be needed in pure stress incontinence. Urodynamics can be valuable in unmasking stress urinary incontinence in prolapse, although its impact on the ultimate management of occult incontinence remains debated. This article reviews the indications for urodynamic testing in women with SUI but will exclude more complex conditions such as mixed or recurrent incontinence which are outside the scope of this review.     

Is Fever Protective in Surgical Patients with Bloodstream Infection?

BACKGROUND: Sepsis from bloodstream infection (BSI) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among surgical patients. Our hypothesis was that fever and leukocytosis during BSI would be associated with gram-negative pathogens and worse outcomes among hospitalized surgical patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospectively collected dataset of all infections diagnosed on the adult general and trauma surgery services between December 1996 and December 2005 at the University of Virginia Hospital was reviewed. Fever was considered a temperature of > or = 38.5 degrees C, and leukocytosis was defined as a white blood cell count > or = 15,000/microL within 24 hours of treatment for infection. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of fever and mortality. RESULTS: Over 9 years, 823 BSIs were analyzed. One hundred forty-eight BSIs resulted in death (18.0%), and 541 (65.7%) patients were febrile at diagnosis; mortality for these two groups were 12.9% and 27.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Febrile patients had a trend toward fewer gram-negative infections (27.0% versus 31.9%, p = 0.13), 403 had a leukocytosis at diagnosis and 420 did not; mortality for the two groups was 19.1% and 16.9%, respectively (p = NS). Higher maximum temperature was protective against mortality in the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 0.60 per C degrees, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among surgical patients with sepsis, fever during BSI was not associated with a gram-negative cause and correlated with survival, although increasing WBC had little effect. Mortality after BSI appears associated more with an initially blunted physiologic response than with a robust, proinflammatory response. In addition, a threshold for blood culture other than temperature > or = 38.5 degrees C should be considered.     

Is the Quality of Life Better in Patients with Colostomy than Patients with Fecal Incontience?

Background A colostomy offers definitive treatment for individuals with fecal incontinence (FI). Patients and physicians remain apprehensive regarding this option because the quality of life (QOL) with a colostomy is presumably worse than living with FI. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the QOL of colostomy patients to patients with FI. Methods A cross-sectional postal survey of patients with FI or an end colostomy was undertaken. QOL measures used included the Short Form 36 General Quality of Life Assessment (SF-36) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life score (FIQOL). Results The colostomy group included 39 patients and the FI group included 71 patients. The average FI score for FI group was 12 ± 4.9 (0 = complete continence, 20 = severe incontinence). In the colostomy group the average colostomy function score was 12.9 ± 3.8 (7 = good function, 35 = poor function). Analysis of the SF-36 revealed higher social function score in the colostomy group compared to the FI group. Analysis of the FIQOL revealed higher scores in the coping, embarrassment, lifestyle scales, and depression scales in the colostomy group compared to the FI group. Conclusion A colostomy is a viable option for patients who suffer from FI and offers a definitive cure with improved QOL.     

Does Epidural Morphine Loading in Addition to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Benefit the Postoperative Management of Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Open Bariatric Surgery? A Pilot Study

Background

Insufficient data exist regarding postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia for morbidly obese patients undergoing open bariatric surgery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of morphine loading in a postoperative thoracic epidural analgesic regimen of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with levobupivacaine combined with continuously administered epidural morphine in this patient group.

Methods

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 48 superobese patients (body mass index of ≥50 kg/m²) undergoing open bariatric surgery were randomly allocated to three groups of 16 patients each. Postoperatively, all groups received a continuous epidural morphine infusion of 0.2 mg/h with 0.1 % levobupivacaine via PCEA. Group A did not receive intraoperative epidural morphine loading, while groups B and C received an intraoperative 1- and 2-mg morphine bolus, respectively. Levobupivacaine consumption via PCEA (primary outcome), pain scores at rest and on cough, the time to return of bowel function and ambulation, and arterial blood gas levels (secondary outcomes) were recorded.

Results

The increase in perioperative morphine administration (groups B and C) led to a significantly prolonged return to normal bowel function and delayed ambulation (P?Conclusions Thoracic PCEA with 0.1 % levobupivacaine combined with continuous epidural morphine administration of 0.2 mg/h without morphine loading is an effective postoperative analgesic regimen that provides adequate pain control, early ambulation, and early return of bowel function in superobese patients, particularly those with OSA.     

When Is Prophylactic Thyroidectomy Indicated for Patients with the RET Codon 609 Mutation?

Background  Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene cause multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN2A), and prophylactic thyroidectomy has generally been recommended before the age of 5 years. Patients with codon 609 mutations develop MTC at a later age and therefore the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy is less clear. We report a three-generation family with C609Y RET mutation where members having prophylactic or therapeutic thyroidectomy call the current recommendations for age at thyroidectomy into question. Methods  Sixteen family members underwent thyroidectomy, for which clinical, laboratory, and pathological data were analyzed. A literature review of RET codon 609 mutations was carried out. Results  Data were collected from 16 patients from this 38-member kindred. None of these affected members had pheochromocytoma, and one had a parathyroid adenoma. Nine of 16 patients had MTC (mean age 44.7 years, range 29–59 years) and elevated basal calcitonin levels; 6 of these 9 had lymph node metastases. Two patients had C-cell hyperplasia (CCH) at ages 18 and 37 years, and five patients had normal thyroid pathology (mean age 16 years, range 5–37 years). In the literature, a family with C609Y mutation was reported, with 15 members having MTC (mean age 42 years, range 21–59 years), and 6 with CCH (mean age 24 years, range 15–37 years). Conclusion  The youngest patient with C609Y RET mutation and MTC was 21 years old, and the youngest patient with CCH was 15 years old at diagnosis. These data suggest that patients with RET C609Y mutations can delay thyroidectomy until 10–15 years of age, with annual calcitonin screening prior to thyroidectomy.     

Is Laparoscopic Resection Adequate in Patients with Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Tumors?

Since the first reports with laparoscopic resection of islet cell tumors in 1996, the experience worldwide is still limited, with only short-term outcomes available. Some have suggested that a malignant tumor is a contraindication to laparoscopic resection. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach in patients with functioning, nonfunctioning, or overt malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNT). To our knowledge this is the largest single-institution series on this subject to date. Patients and methods A total of 49 consecutive patients (43 women, 6 men; mean age 58 years, range 22–83 years) underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) from April 1998 to June 2007. Preoperative localization was done by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, and Octreoscan imaging. Other than 9 PNTs localized in the head of the pancreas, all tumors were located in the left pancreas. Malignancy was diagnosed based on the presence of lymph nodes or liver metastasis. There were 33 patients with functioning tumors: 4 with gastrinomas (mean size 1.2 cm), 1 with a glucagonoma (4 cm), 3 with vipomas (3.2 cm), 2 with carcinoids (5.2 cm), 20 with sporadic insulinomas (1.4 cm), 2 with insulinoma/multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) (4.4 cm), and 1 with a malignant insulinoma (13 cm). Sixteen patients had a nonfunctioning tumor (mean size 5 cm). The following techniques were performed: laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap SPDP), laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (Lap SxDP) and laparoscopic enucleation (Lap En)/laparoscopic excision (Lap E). Lymph node dissection was performed when malignancy was suspected (Strasberg′s technique). Evaluation criteria included operative and postoperative factors, pathologic data including R0 or R1 resection (the pancreatic transection margin and all transection margins on the specimen were inked). Long-term outcomes were analyzed by tumor recurrence and patient survival. Results Four cases (8.2%) were converted to open surgery. Overall, Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En/Lap E were performed in 15 (33.3%), 8 (17.8%), and 22 (48.9%) patients, respectively. The operative time and blood loss was significantly lower in the Lap En group compared with the other laparoscopic techniques. The group of patients with malignant tumors undergoing Lap SxDP had a longer operating time and greater blood loss compared with the other distal pancreatectomy (Lap DP) techniques. Overall, the postoperative complications were significantly higher in the Lap En group (42.8%) than in the Lap DP (Lap SPDP + Lap SxDP) group (22%). These complications were mainly pancreatic fistula: 8.7% after Lap DP and 38% after Lap En. The overall morbidity was significantly higher after Lap SPDP (26.7%) than after Lap SxDP (12.5%) owing to the occurrence of splenic complications in the Lap SPDP group without splenic vessel preservation two of seven (28.5%). The means and ranges of hospital stay after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En/Lap E were 5.9 (5–14), 7.5 (5–12), and 5.5 (5–7) days, respectively (NS). Pathology examination of the specimen showed R0 resection in all patients with malignant PNT. The mean time to resumption of previous activities for patients undergoing Lap DP or Lap En was 3 weeks. There were no postoperative (30 days) or hospital deaths. Conclusions This series demonstrates that LPS is feasible and safe in benign-appearing and malignant neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPTs). The benefits of minimally invasive surgery were manifest in the short hospital stay and acceptable pancreas-related complications in high-risk patients. LPS can achieve negative tangential margins in a high percentage of patients with malignant tumors. Although surgical cure is rare in malignant NEPTs, significant long-term palliation can be achieved in a large proportion of patients with an aggressive surgical approach.     

Which Parameter Is More Influential on the Development of Arteriosclerosis in Hemodialysis Patients?

Arteriosclerosis is characterized by stiffening of arteries. The incremental elastic modulus (Einc) measurement is a good marker of arterial wall stiffness. Metabolic, inflammatory and hemodynamic alterations cause structural changes and vascular complications in end stage renal disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factors that may affect the development of arteriosclerosis by measurement of Einc in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thirty-two patients (16 men; 16 female) on chronic HD with a mean age of 42.2 ± 19.3 (range: 15–80) were included in the study. The carotid Einc was measured to determine arteriosclerosis by high-resolution echo-tracking system (Acuson Aspen, Acuson Corp., Mountain View, California, USA). Einc measurement was calculated from transcutaneous measurements of common carotid arterial (CCA) internal diameter and wall thickness and carotid pulse pressure. Common carotid compliance and distensibility were determined from changes in carotid artery diameter during systole and simultaneously measured carotid pulse pressure. Common carotid artery stuffiness (Einc) was influenced by age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), calcium (Ca) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The distensibility of CCA was correlated with age, SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), PP, Ca, ALP, and parathormone (PTH). The inflammatory parameter, hs-CRP, was increased with Einc. The mean Einc measurement was found significantly increased in patient receiving vitamin D. In conclusion, the stiffening of carotid artery in HD patients is related not only to hemodynamic changes (increased SBP, PP) but also to metabolic (increased Ca) and to inflammation (increased hs-CRP). Carotid Einc is accepted independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Because of the positive correlation between Einc and serum Ca, vitamin D and Ca containing phosphorus (P) binders should be used carefully.     

Is it More Difficult to Cannulate the Right Internal Jugular Vein in Morbidly Obese Patients than in Nonobese Patients?

BACKGROUND: The placement of an internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter is considered to be more difficult in morbidly obese patients. The objective of this study was to compare the success of simulated IJV puncture between morbidly obese patients and a nonobese control group. METHODS: Thirty-four morbidly obese patients with body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) >/=40 were compared with 36 patients with BMI < 30. Right IJV puncture was simulated using an ultrasound probe directed towards the sternal notch at the midpoint between the sternal notch and the mastoid process. The investigator placing the probe was blinded as to the image being created on the ultrasound machine. Success rate was assessed at three different head rotation angles from midline; 0 degrees , 30 degrees , and 60 degrees . RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in successful simulated IJV puncture between two groups for any of the head positions. However, there was a higher incidence of the carotid artery (CA) puncture in the morbidly obese patient group when the head rotation was advanced from neutral position to 60 degrees (p < 0.05). In addition, the ultrasound showed significantly more overlapping of the IJV over the CA in morbidly obese patients at 0 degrees (p < 0.05) and 30 degrees (p < 0.05). Our results show no statistically significant difference in success rate of IJV puncture between morbidly obese patients and nonobese patients. Keeping the head in a neutral position in morbidly obese patients minimizes the overlapping of the IJV over the CA and the risk of CA puncture. CONCLUSION: However, due to the fact that even in the neutral position there is a significant increase in overlap between IJV and CA, we recommend the use of ultrasound guidance for IJV cannulation in obese patients.