Troglitazone hepatotoxicity: are we getting closer to understanding idiosyncratic liver injury?

Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity is a rare and unpredictable eventof liver injury affecting generally less than 1 in 10,000 patientstreated with certain drugs. However, it is a serious clinicalproblem as it accounts for 10% of all drug-induced liver failurecases (Kaplowitz, 2005). Since idiosyncratic drug reactionsare not detected in preclinical testing and in most cases noteven during clinical trials, the problem surfaces generallyafter the drug is approved and hundreds of thousands of patientsare being treated. Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicities are currentlythe main cause for Food and Drug Administration-mandated warnings,restrictions of use or even withdrawals of drugs from the market(Kaplowitz, 2005). As such, this is a considerable problem forthe pharmaceutical industry and for regulatory agencies worldwide.One of the recent examples of drugs causing idiosyncratic hepatotoxicityand liver failure was the antidiabetic drug Rezulin (troglitazone). Troglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator–activated     

Is it possible to more accurately predict which drug candidates will cause idiosyncratic drug reactions?

The unexpected occurrence of idiosyncratic drug reactions during late clinical trials or after a drug has been released can lead to a severe restriction in its use or failure to release/withdrawal. This leads to considerable uncertainty in drug development and has led to attempts to try to predict a drug's potential to cause such reactions. It appears that most idiosyncratic drug reactions are due to reactive metabolites; however, many drugs that form reactive metabolites are associated with a very low incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions. Therefore. screening drug for their ability to generate reactive metabolites is likely to cause the rejection of many good drug candidates. There is evidence to suggest that an idiosyncratic drug reaction is more likely if there is some "danger signal'. Thus drugs that cause some degree of cell stress or damage may be more likely to lead to a high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions. The exact nature of the putative danger signals is unknown. However, a screen of the effects of drugs known to be associated with a high incidence of idiosyncatic reactions using expression genomics and proteomics may reveal a pattern or patterns of mRNA and protein expression that predict which drugs will cause a high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions. Although idiosyncratic drug reactions are not usually detected in animal tests because they are just as idiosyncratic in animals as they are in humans, it is likely that drug reactive metabolites would also cause similar cell stress in animals. It is more likely that in most cases it is differences in the immune response to the reactive metabolites that determine which individuals will develop an idiosyncratic reaction. If the expression of certain proteins in animals treated with a drug candidate could be used as a screening method to predict a drug's potential to cause a high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions, it would greatly facilitate the development of safer drugs.     

Are zebrafish larvae suitable for assessing the hepatotoxicity potential of drug candidates?

Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) is poorly predicted by single‐cell‐based assays, probably because of the lack of physiological interactions with other cells within the liver. An intact whole liver system such as one present in zebrafish larvae could provide added value in a screening strategy for DILI; however, the possible occurrence of other organ toxicities and the immature larval stage of the zebrafish might complicate accurate and fast analysis. We investigated whether expression analysis of liver‐specific fatty acid binding protein 10a (lfabp10a) was an appropriate endpoint for assessing hepatotoxic effects in zebrafish larvae. It was found that expression analysis of lfabp10a was a valid marker, as after treatment with hepatotoxicants, dose–response curves could be obtained and statistically significant abnormal lfabp10 expression levels correlated with hepatocellular histopathological changes in the liver. However, toxicity in other vital organs such as the heart could impact liver outgrowth and thus had to be assessed concurrently. Whether zebrafish larvae were suitable for assessing human relevant drug‐induced hepatotoxicity was assessed with hepatotoxicants and non‐hepatotoxicants that have been marketed for human use and classified according to their mechanism of toxicity. The zebrafish larva showed promising predictivity towards a number of mechanisms and was capable of distinguishing between hepatotoxic and non‐hepatotoxic chemical analogues, thus implying its applicability as a potential screening model for DILI. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Does inhibition of P-glycoprotein lead to drug–drug interactions?

Permeability-glycoprotein (Pgp) is a drug transporter responsible for the efflux of xenobiotics out of cells that influence the pharmacokinetics of numerous drugs. However, the role of this transporter in drug-drug interactions is still poorly studied even though a lot of P-glycoprotein substrates and P-glycoprotein inhibitors are identified among drugs of standard usage. On one hand, Pgp is distributed within a lot of organs and tissues implicated in the absorption or excretion of xenobiotics, and drug-drug interactions with this protein may increase the bioavailability of simultaneously administered active drugs. On the other hand, Pgp is linked to the integrity of blood-tissue barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier or placenta, and a partial blockage of Pgp could be responsible for a new drug distribution in the organism with possible increase of drug rates in organs behind these barriers. Therefore, concomitant administration of substrates and Pgp inhibitors would modify drug pharmacokinetics by increasing bioavailability and organ uptake, leading to more adverse drug reactions and toxicities. Consequently, the identification and comprehension of these drug-drug interactions remain important keys to risk assessment.     

Does prolonged oral exposure to cyanide promote hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity?

Long-term exposure to cyanide and/or its main metabolite, thiocyanate, has been associated with goiter, pancreatic diabetes and several neurological disorders. However, very little is found in the literature relating the nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic effects of these substances. Thus, the objective of the present study was to verify the effects of prolonged exposure to potassium cyanide (KCN) in these organs. Forty-six male adults rats, weighing approximately 200 g at the beginning of the experiment, were distributed into five groups-four experimental and one control. Experimental groups were dosed with target doses of 0.3, 0.9, 3.0 or 9.0 mg KCN/kg per day, in the drinking water, during 15 days and the control groups received only tap water. At the end of this experiment, all rats were subjected to euthanasia and plasma samples were obtained in order to determine thiocyanate and thyroidal hormones levels and fragments of thyroid, kidney and liver were collected. Rats treated with the highest cyanide dose (9.0 mg KCN/kg per day) showed lower body weight gain. An increase in the thiocyanate levels was verified in all experimental groups. The histopathologic study revealed hydropic degeneration of the renal tubular epithelial cells in those animals, which received KCN at the dose of 3.0-9.0 mg/kg per day. This study also showed hydropic degeneration of the hepatocytes of those animals, which received KCN at a dose of 9.0 mg/kg per day, and in the thyroid gland an increase was observed in the number of reabsorption vacuoles on follicular colloid, in a dose-dependent manner, in all animals of the experimental groups.     

Do drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic departments make any contribution to drug discovery?

The alignment of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic departments with drug discovery has not produced a radical improvement in the pharmacokinetic properties of new chemical entities. The reason for this is complex, reflecting in part the difficulty of combining potency, selectivity, water solubility, metabolic stability and membrane permeability into a single molecule. This combination becomes increasingly problematic as the drug targets become more distant from aminergic seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors (7-TMs). The leads available for aminergic 7-TMs, like the natural agonists, are invariably small molecular weight, water soluble and potent. Even moving to 7-TMs for which the agonist is a peptide invariably produces lead matter that is less drug-like (higher molecular weight and lipophilic). The role of drug metabolism departments, therefore, has been to guide chemistry to obtaining adequate, rather than optimal, pharmacokinetic properties for these 'difficult' drug targets. A consistent belief of many researchers is that a high value is placed on optimal, rather than adequate, pharmacokinetic properties. One measure of value is market sales, and when these are examined no clear pattern emerges. Part of the success of amlodipine in the calcium channel antagonist sector must be due to its excellent pharmacokinetic profile, but the best-selling drugs among the angiotensin antagonists and beta-blockers have a much greater market share than other agents with better pharmacokinetic properties. Clearly, many other factors are important in the successful launch of a medicine, some reflected in the manner the compound is developed and the subsequent structure of the labelling. Overall, therefore the presence of drug metabolism in drug discovery has probably contributed most by allowing 'difficult' drug targets to be prosecuted, rather than by guiding medicinal chemists to optimal pharmacokinetics. These 'difficult' target candidates become successful drugs when skilfully developed. There is no doubt that skilful development relies heavily on drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic departments, in this case those with a clinical rather than a preclinical orientation.     

Targeted drug delivery to lymphocytes: a route to site-specific immunomodulation?

Lymphocytes are central to the progression of autoimmune disease, transplant rejection, leukemia, lymphoma and lymphocyte-resident viral diseases such as HIV/AIDs. Strategies to target drug treatments to lymphocytes, therefore, represent an opportunity to enhance therapeutic outcomes in disease states where many current treatment regimes are incompletely effective and promote significant toxicities. Here we demonstrate that highly lipophilic drug candidates that preferentially access the intestinal lymphatics after oral administration show significantly enhanced access to lymphocytes leading to improved immunomodulatory activity. When coadministered with such drugs, lipids enhance lymphocyte targeting via a three tiered action: promotion of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, enhancement of lymphatic drug transport and stimulation of lymphocyte recruitment into the lymphatics. This strategy has been exemplified using a highly lipophilic immunosuppressant (JWH015) where coadministration with selected lipids led to significant increases in lymphatic transport, lymphocyte targeting and IL-4 and IL-10 expression in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes after ex vivo mitogen stimulation. In contrast, administration of a 2.5-fold higher dose of JWH015 in a formulation that did not stimulate lymph transport had no effect on antiinflammatory cytokine levels, in spite of equivalent drug exposure in the blood. The current data suggest that complementary drug design and delivery strategies that combine highly lipophilic, lymphotropic drug candidates with lymph-directing formulations provide enhanced selectivity, potency and therapeutic potential for drug candidates with lymphocyte associated targets.     

Icariside Ⅱ, a main compound in Epimedii Folium,induces idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity by enhancing NLRP3 inflammasome activation

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is an infrequent but potentially serious disease that develops the main reason for post-marketing safety warnings and withdrawals of drugs. Epimedii Folium (EF), the widely used herbal medicine, has shown to cause idiosyncratic liver injury, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Increasing evidence has indicated that most cases of IDILI are immune mediated. Here, we report that icariside Ⅱ (ICS Ⅱ), the major active and metabolic constituent of EF, causes idiosyncratic liver injury by promoting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. ICS Ⅱ exacerbates NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and nigericin, but not silicon dioxide (SiO₂), monosodium urate (MSU) crystal or cytosolic lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Additionally, the activation of NLRC4 and AIM2 inflammasomes is not affected by ICS Ⅱ. Mechanistically, synergistic induction of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) is a crucial contributor to the enhancing effect of ICS Ⅱ on ATP- or nigericin-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Importantly, in vivo data show that a combination of non-hepatotoxic doses of LPS and ICS Ⅱ causes the increase of aminotransferase activity, hepatic inflammation and pyroptosis, which is attenuated by Nlrp3 deficiency or pretreatment with MCC950 (a specific NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor). In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that ICS Ⅱ causes idiosyncratic liver injury through enhancing NLRP3 inflammasome activation and suggest that ICS Ⅱ may be a risk factor and responsible for EF-induced liver injury.     

Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitophagy: the beginning and end to diabetic nephropathy?

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a progressive microvascular complication arising from diabetes. Within the kidney, the glomeruli, tubules, vessels and interstitium are disrupted, ultimately impairing renal function and leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Current pharmacological therapies used in individuals with DN do not prevent the inevitable progression to ESRD; therefore, new targets of therapy are urgently required. Studies from animal models indicate that disturbances in mitochondrial homeostasis are central to the pathogenesis of DN. Since renal proximal tubule cells rely on oxidative phosphorylation to provide adequate ATP for tubular reabsorption, an impairment of mitochondrial bioenergetics can result in renal functional decline. Defects at the level of the electron transport chain have long been established in DN, promoting electron leakage and formation of superoxide radicals, mediating microinflammation and contributing to the renal lesion. More recent studies suggest that mitochondrial-associated proteins may be directly involved in the pathogenesis of tubulointerstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis. An accumulation of fragmented mitochondria are found in the renal cortex in both humans and animals with DN, suggesting that in tandem with a shift in dynamics, mitochondrial clearance mechanisms may be impaired. The process of mitophagy is the selective targeting of damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria to autophagosomes for degradation through the autophagy pathway. The current review explores the concept that an impairment in the mitophagy system leads to the accelerated progression of renal pathology. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular events that govern mitophagy and dynamics in DN may lead to improved therapeutic strategies.

Linked Articles

This article is part of a themed issue on Mitochondrial Pharmacology: Energy, Injury & Beyond. To view the other articles in this issue visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue-8