Biological effective dose for comparison and combination of external beam and low-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy prostate cancer treatment plans.

We report a methodology for comparing and combining dose information from external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and interstitial brachytherapy (IB) components of prostate cancer treatment using the biological effective dose (BED). On a prototype early-stage prostate cancer patient treated with EBRT and low-dose rate I-125 brachytherapy, a 3-dimensional dose distribution was calculated for each of the EBRT and IB portions of treatment. For each component of treatment, the BED was calculated on a point-by-point basis to produce a BED distribution. These individual BED distributions could then be summed for combined therapies. BED dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the prostate, urethra, rectum, and bladder were produced and compared for various combinations of EBRT and IB. Transformation to BED enabled computation of the relative contribution of each modality to the prostate dose, as the relative weighting of EBRT and IB was varied. The BED-DVHs of the prostate and urethra demonstrated dramatically increased inhomogeneity with the introduction of even a small component of IB. However, increasing the IB portion relative to the EBRT component resulted in lower dose to the surrounding normal structures, as evidenced by the BED-DVHs of the bladder and rectum. Conformal EBRT and low-dose rate IB conventional dose distributions were successfully transformed to the common "language" of BED distributions for comparison and for merging prostate cancer radiation treatment plans. The results of this analysis can assist physicians in quantitatively determining the best combination and weighting of radiation treatment modalities for individual patients.     

Severe complications after hypofractionated high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation for oesophageal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate severe complications that developed after high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for oesophageal carcinoma. Six consecutive patients with oesophageal carcinoma were treated by external beam irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) followed by hypofractionated intracavitary HDR brachytherapy (10 Gy in 2 fractions). Two of the six patients were alive and well for more than 2-3 years following therapy, but three of the six patients developed treatment-related oesophageal fistulae and died. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation is an effective method for radical treatment of oesophageal carcinoma. However, hypofractionated HDR brachytherapy should be used with care.     

Treatment of localized prostate cancer using a combination of high dose rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: initial Australian experience

Combination high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and external beam radiation therapy is technically and clinically feasible as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. We report the first large Australian experience using this technique of radiation dose escalation in 82 patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease. With a median follow up of 3 years (156 weeks), complications were low and overall prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was 91% using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The delivery of hypofractionated radiation through the HDRB component shortens overall treatment time and is both biologically and logistically advantageous. As a radiation boost strategy, HDRB is easy to learn and could be introduced into most facilities with brachytherapy capability.     

CT guided interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas

This paper describes the technique and preliminary results of high dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent grade III and grade IV gliomas. Although in the initial treatment of malignant gliomas brachytherapy has been shown to give better results than external beam therapy, this has previously always been with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Stereotactic frames are used for interstitial LDR brachytherapy but a CT image-guided technique does not require such a frame. The survival rates for our initial 53 patients do not significantly differ from LDR results. However, using HDR there are several advantages, including a much shorter treatment time with HDR than LDR and better patient comfort. HDR also allows better individualized optimization of the treatment than LDR.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with conformal external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer

PurposeTo report long-term outcomes for treatment of prostate cancer using dose escalation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy (3DCRT), and compare them with outcomes for treatment of prostate cancer with 3DCRT alone at the same institution.Methods and MaterialsFrom 1998 to 2003, 587 patients were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients received either 3DCRT (median, 46 Gy) with a single HDR brachytherapy implant (196 patients) delivering a fractionated dose of 18 Gy (combined group) or 3DCRT (median, 70 Gy; 387 patients; “3DCRT alone”). There were 41.9% patients with intermediate-risk and 42.6% with high-risk disease. In all, 441 patients (75.1%) received neoadjuvant and 116 patients (19.8%) received adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. The American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Phoenix definition for biochemical failure was used.ResultsThe median followup was 5.5 years. The 5- and 7-year biochemical control (BC) rates were 82.5% and 80.3%, respectively, for the combined group and 81.3% and 71%, respectively, for 3DCRT alone; for overall survival, they were 91.9% and 89.5% vs. 88.7% and 86.2%, respectively, whereas for cause-specific survival, they were 96.9% and 96.1% vs. 97.6% and 96.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for BC revealed that low Gleason grade, HDR brachytherapy combined with 3DCRT, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy were significant in predicting BC. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 late urinary and rectal morbidity rates were 7.1% and 0%, respectively. No Grade ≥4 reactions were detected.ConclusionsHDR brachytherapy combined with 3DCRT was associated with improved BC and minimal toxicity in patients with unfavorable prostate cancer compared with conventional 3DCRT.     

Transrectal ultrasonography as a follow-up method in prostatic carcinoma after external beam and interstitial radiotherapy

Transrectal ultrasonography and ultrasonometrics were employed for follow-up in a total of 28 prostatic carcinoma patients subjected to external beam or interstitial radiotherapy. These two methods permit more accurate staging of prostatic carcinoma and have also proved to be valuable in the follow-up care of patients suffering from locoregional prostatic carcinoma. Of the 20 patients subjected to external beam radiotherapy four patients initially did not show capsular infiltration, 2B2, 2A2, whereas 16 patients presented with infiltration of the capsule and seminal vesicles. After external beam radiotherapy the ultrasonomorphologic findings of four patients revealed a sharply demarcated capsule and unremarkable seminal vesicles, which indicated tumour regression. Of five patients with infiltration of the pelvic floor and/or seminal vesicles, three showed definite tumour regression, whereas the ultrasonograms of the other two patients demonstrated tumour progression despite radiotherapy. In eight patients the greatest reduction in tumour volume was found one year after interstitial radiotherapy. Only one patient, initially presenting with slight infiltration of the capsule, was shown to have infiltration of the capsule and seminal vesicles after interstitial radiotherapy. At follow-up, evaluation of the echo patterns in these patients was inaccurate on account of the dense echoes reflected by the seeds implanted.     

Changes in applicator positions and dose distribution between high dose rate brachytherapy fractions in cervix carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy

This study examines the change of applicator geometry and its effect on rectal/rectum (R) and bladder (B) doses, and obtained radiobiological equivalent doses (RED), between each high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) fraction in cervical carcinoma patients. BT using a tandem (T) and two ovoids (O) is included, and any discrepancies in applicator positions among the fractions were calculated. Whether the change of applicator position had an effect on the calculated R and B doses was analysed. Furthermore, the relationship between the size of tumour, the magnitude of displacement and the change in R and B doses was also investigated. Lastly, the changes in R and B RED were noted. The average magnitude of displacement was between 2.0 mm and 16.9 mm, showing time trend. There was no relationship between tumour size and the magnitude of discrepancy of Left O, Right O, T, R, B, and neither change in R and B doses (p>0.05). The mean differences of R and B doses were between 49-78 cGy, and 70-84 cGy, respectively. The magnitude of discrepancy and changes in doses showed no correlation (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in REDs for bladder (p = 0.8) and rectum (p = 0.2). In conclusion, there were significant differences in the applicator positions R and B and R and B doses among the fractions, which confirm the necessity of treatment planning in each HDR BT fraction. However, the total calculated R and B REDs did not show a remarkable difference.     

Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason pattern 5 treated with combined brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

PurposeRecent reports have suggested relatively poor prognosis for prostate cancer patients with Gleason pattern 5 treated with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (XRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We present the largest series of men with high-risk, Gleason pattern 5 prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy and XRT.Methods and MaterialsBetween April 1995 and December 2008, 329 consecutive patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk disease were treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Most received XRT and ADT. Median followup was 7.2 years. The cause of death was determined for each deceased patient. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for impact on the evaluated survival parameters.ResultsAt 10 years, biochemical progression-free survival, cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival for the group of high-risk patients as a whole was 91.1%, 95.5%, and 72.5%, respectively. There was no difference in biochemical progression-free survival between men with and without Gleason pattern 5 (89.7% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.56). However, men with Gleason pattern 5 had lower prostate cancer CSS (90.3% vs. 98.1%; p = 0.011). There was no difference in overall survival comparing men with and without Gleason pattern 5 disease (67.7% vs. 75.4%; p = 0.14).ConclusionsMen with high-risk, Gleason pattern 5 histology treated with brachytherapy and XRT have excellent long-term outcomes, which compare favorably to dose-escalated XRT/ADT series without brachytherapy. Nonetheless, Gleason pattern 5 results in lower CSS than high-risk disease without Gleason pattern 5.     

A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer

PURPOSEThis study compared the efficacy and side effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with EBRT alone in patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 2013 and 2020, 64 patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer without surgery received radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received EBRT + IBT. EBRT dose was 50 Gy, 2 Gy/f, 5 times a week, and IBT dose was 10 Gy, 5 Gy/f, once a week. Thirty-two patients received EBRT alone, and the total dose was 60 Gy. The median followup was 19 months.RESULTSThe local control rates (LCR) of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment were 88% and 72%, 53% and 22%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 3 years after treatment were 38% and 9%. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group were 25% and 9%. Univariate analysis showed that EBRT + IBT could be the prognostic factor improving OS (p = 0.04), and tumor located in the mid-thoracic region exhibited a poorer prognosis on LRFS (p = 0.03). Grade 3 or higher acute side effects included two cases of dysphagia and three cases of bone marrow suppression. Severe late side effects included three cases of fistula, three cases of radiation pneumonia, and five cases of stenosis requiring treatment.CONCLUSIONSCompared with EBRT alone, EBRT + IBT is an effective treatment modality for T1～3NanyM0 primary thoracic esophageal cancer with good local control. It can prolong the survival time of patients and has acceptable toxicity.     

Improving external beam radiotherapy by combination with internal irradiation

The efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is dose dependent, but the dose that can be applied to solid tumour lesions is limited by the sensitivity of the surrounding tissue. The combination of EBRT with systemically applied radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a promising approach to increase efficacy of radiotherapy. Toxicities of both treatment modalities of this combination of internal and external radiotherapy (CIERT) are not additive, as different organs at risk are in target. However, advantages of both single treatments are combined, for example, precise high dose delivery to the bulk tumour via standard EBRT, which can be increased by addition of RIT, and potential targeting of micrometastases by RIT. Eventually, theragnostic radionuclide pairs can be used to predict uptake of the radiotherapeutic drug prior to and during therapy and find individual patients who may benefit from this treatment. This review aims to highlight the outcome of pre-clinical studies on CIERT and resultant questions for translation into the clinic. Few clinical data are available until now and reasons as well as challenges for clinical implementation are discussed.External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone and in combination with surgery and/or chemotherapy is one of the main modalities for cancer treatment and has a high potential to permanently cure solid tumours even in locally advanced stages by inactivation of cancer stem cells.¹ EBRT can be administered precisely to a target volume during a course of fractionated irradiation. The homogeneous energy dose has a high intensity in solid tumour lesions. For some cancers, survival rates after primary radiotherapy are high [e.g. early stage larynx cancer and early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)], whereas for many other entities they are not (e.g. glioblastomas, sarcomas and advanced NSCLC).²One way to improve radiotherapy is to increase the inactivation of tumour cells. However, the applicable EBRT dose is limited by the radiosensitivity of the surrounding tissue. While EBRT is directed to the local tumour disease, the use of systemic radioimmunotherapy (RIT) offers the possibility to treat both, localized and diffuse tumours and (micro)metastases.³ Radionuclides are bound to carrier molecules that target tumour cells. Thus, they are distributed according to the properties of the tracer and are continuously effective during a longer period compared with EBRT, although dose rates decrease depending on the half-life of the radionuclide. Some free therapeutic radionuclides are effective for specific indications, e.g. ¹³¹I for treatment of thyroid cancer or palliative use of ²²³Ra against bone metastases. However, these cannot be translated to treatment of other entities. Besides, radioactive-labelled cytostatic drugs and hormone derivatives,⁴ particularly monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have been radiolabelled and investigated.⁵ Given a substantial difference in the target receptor expression between the tumour cells and surrounding normal tissues, a dose fall-off between both tissues can be expected. The radiolabelled mAb Zevalin^® ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin^®, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany) directed against CD20 is approved by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin''s lymphomas, which are generally considered as radiosensitive. However, mAb are large and are thus taken up slowly into solid tumour tissue followed by a long clearance. Additionally, accumulation in solid tumours depends on vascularization, vessel permeability, tumour size, interstitial pressure and other microenvironmental characteristics.^6,7 Furthermore, mAb are rather susceptible when labelling under rough conditions. Thus, the application of molecules such as fragment antigen-binding (Fab),^8–10 nanobodies,^11,12 affybodies,^13,14 single chain variable fragments (scFvs),^15,16 aptamers^17–19 or peptides^20,21 is considered. In addition to the effects on target cell, radionuclides with sufficient radiation path length (e.g. β-emitters) can destroy adjacent tumour cells by the crossfire effect, that is through the range of radiation in tissue, cells can be killed without having bound the radionuclide itself.²² This is regarded as a main advantage of RIT for the treatment of solid tumours as plasticity of tumour cells (e.g. loss of target antigen) and delivery barriers can be overcome by some extent. However, the dose-limiting organ in non-myelo-ablative RIT is the red bone marrow and myelosuppression the main toxicity.²² Therefore, the maximum tolerated activity that was applied in clinical RIT trials (reviewed in Navarro-Teulon et al²³) did not result in tumour doses >33 Gy in large tumours, which is not enough to achieve permanent local control of solid tumours.

Combination of internal and external radiotherapy

The combination of internal (incorporated) and external radiotherapy (CIERT) is a novel promising approach in radiation oncology. In this review, CIERT is defined more specifically by an integrated (without interval) application of EBRT and systemically applied RIT. Other approaches such as the combination of external radiotherapy with selective internal radiotherapy, radioembolization, brachytherapy, seed implantation, other intravenously applied radionuclide therapies or sequential application of any of these treatments will not be considered here. Furthermore, the focus will be on solid tumours.The potential benefit of such a combined irradiation is to increase the energy dose applied to the solid tumour lesion, while respecting the limitations of the surrounding normal tissues and the organs at risk (OARs) that are different for both treatment modalities (see above). Figure 1 summarizes the characteristics and OARs of EBRT and RIT and gives an overview on the advantages of the combinatorial approach. Beyond local treatment intensification, another advantage of CIERT can be the combination of local treatment, directed to the solid tumour, and systemic treatment, directed to the subclinically disseminated disease, that is, microscopic tumour lesions not detectable on imaging.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Combination of internal and external radiotherapy (CIERT). Treatment characteristics of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT) are summarized and advantages of the combination strategy (CIERT) are depicted. Local treatment of the solid tumour via precise EBRT is supplemented by a systemically applied radiotherapeutic drug. Thereby, the tumour dose is enhanced without additional toxicity and (micro)metastasis are potentially targeted. Further, usage of theragnostic radionuclide pairs has the potential to predict delivery and dose distribution of RIT before and during treatment. OAR, organ at risk.Many challenges are to be met prior to the initiation of CIERT. For example, thoughts on the treatment schedule of CIERT and dosimetry considerations are inevitable. The EBRT would usually be applied as standard treatment. Considerations on the RIT part equal usual aspects of RIT, for example, application of cold doses as well as the choice of the carrier molecule (according to the tumour target) and radionuclides. Accordingly, new developments in the field of RIT, for example, pre-targeting strategies, might be applicable for CIERT approaches in the future but have not been used in this context so far. Many of those aspects are intensively researched with regard to single treatments and reviewed elsewhere.^3,23–29 This work focuses on the presentation of pre-clinical and clinical investigations on CIERT as a promising treatment strategy.

Choice of radionuclides and theragnostic potential of combination of internal and external radiotherapy

The main factor of radiation toxicity is damage of DNA. If the amount and severity of radiation-induced damage exceeds the repair capacity of the cell, death occurs during mitosis. The linear energy transfer (LET) describes the energy released by the radiation over a certain distance and influences relative biological effectiveness (RBE).^3,30 X-rays as well as γ- and β-emitters have low LET and thus produce individual DNA lesions mainly by indirect ionization that can easily be repaired. By contrast, high and intermediate LET particle emitters cause clusters of DNA damage that are difficult to repair. Thus, α-emitters (high LET) and Auger electrons (intermediate LET) are more cytotoxic at equivalent absorbed doses. The track path length of α-emitters covers only some cell layers (50–100 µm), and Auger electrons have an even shorter range (<1 µm), which, together with the high RBE, makes them suitable for treatment of small volumes such as micrometastasis.^3,31 If larger solid tumours are targeted, microenvironmental factors such as perfusion, vessel permeability and the amount of connective tissue influence the distribution of RIT therapeutics. Thus, the application of β-particles may be most promising for CIERT because their path length of 0.5–12.0 mm enables the crossfire effect.^3,30In contrast to mitotic catastrophe caused by irradiation, apoptosis can be induced by some mAb via blockage of the respective receptor and modification of downstream signalling. Thus, the combination of irradiation and mAb may promote the manifestation of sublethal harm to severe damage, which finally lead to cell death. In case of CIERT, radiation is not only applied via EBRT but also by radionuclides bound to the mAb.A fundamental requisite for the success of radioactivity delivery into solid tumours is that the radionuclide reaches the target and accumulates for an appropriate period. Thus, the pharmacological half-life of the carrier and half-life of the radioactive decay of the chosen nuclide need to be balanced.^3,23 Most pre-clinical and clinical studies on CIERT used large mAb (approximately 150 kDa), which show a slow plasma clearance. Thus, intratumoral accumulation peaks usually several days after injection. Accordingly, most studies used β-emitters or emitters of Auger electrons with half-lives of at least several days. Pickhard et al³² recently showed the benefit of using ²¹³Bi bound to an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in combination with EBRT. They demonstrated that different cell death pathways are triggered by this α-emitter and photon irradiation. However, the short half-life of ²¹³Bi (45 min) may limit its usage for solid tumours in vivo if the nuclide is linked to antibodies, because most doses will be applied before the tracer penetrates into tumour tissue. Thus, ²¹³Bi may only be useful to treat haematological malignancies and therefore is not feasible for CIERT. The concept of pre-targeting is intensively researched in association with RIT as a single treatment. The tumour is pre-targeted with the unlabelled complementary prepared antibody, and the radionuclide is delivered via a small molecule recognizing the antibody by the complementary system in a second step. This may lead to higher tumour uptake with lower normal tissue retention (reviewed in van de Watering et al²⁹). However, a combination with EBRT has never been investigated and substantial research on scheduling would be mandatory.The concept of theragnostic approaches is applicable for CIERT, as theragnostic radionuclide pairs can be used for the RIT part of the therapy. The goal is to combine a diagnostic tool having an imaging radionuclide (positron or γ-radiation emitter) with a derived individualized therapeutic procedure using a therapeutic radionuclide (particle emitter). The tumour and normal tissue uptake of the respective drug can be evaluated for individual patients via positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission CT (SPECT) and give predictive information on a potential treatment benefit. The selection of appropriate radionuclides for imaging with regard to their replacement by a radionuclide for therapeutic purposes that exhibit similar chemical and physical properties is a crucial matter. Thus, it is important to consider different characteristics of radiation according to the requirements, such as decay characteristics, dose range and physical half-life of the radionuclides.³⁰ Imaging with radionuclide-labelled conjugates provides pre-therapeutic information such as biodistribution, hints of a limiting or critical organ or tissue, and maximum tolerated dose. Dosimetry is most challenging, as pre-therapeutic imaging may not be congruent to actual delivered doses.³³ However, this field is extensively investigated for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and results are directly transferable to CIERT approaches. After applying therapeutic nuclide-labelled conjugates, the results of such treatment may again be monitored via imaging. A selection of theragnostic combinations of radionuclides are shown in 51 but its production is difficult and expensive.⁵² The positron emitters ⁸⁶Y and ¹²⁴I have been described controversially as PET nuclides since besides high β⁺-radiation energy they emit multiple high-energy γ photons that cause so-called multiple coincidences disturbing PET imaging quality. However, different correction methods allow improved quantitative imaging.⁵⁰ Moreover, for the application of ⁹⁰Y-labelled radiopharmaceuticals, it is suggested to estimate the uptake and dosimetry with the nuclide counterpart ⁸⁶Y.³⁶ Nevertheless, ⁸⁶Y-PET is far from clinical routine, at least in the near future. Furthermore, ¹³¹I also emits γ-radiation that has been used for imaging, and ¹¹¹In and ¹²³I have a potential for treatment owing to their released Auger electrons.

Table 1.

Potential theragnostic radionuclides^a

Effect of beam arrangement on oral cavity dose in external beam radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

This study compared the oral cavity dose between the routine 7-beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beam arrangement and 2 other 7-beam IMRT with the conventional radiotherapy beam arrangements in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Ten NPC patients treated by the 7-beam routine IMRT technique (IMRT-7R) between April 2009 and June 2009 were recruited. Using the same computed tomography data, target information, and dose constraints for all the contoured structures, 2 IMRT plans with alternative beam arrangements (IMRT-7M and IMRT-7P) by avoiding the anterior facial beam and 1 conventional radiotherapy plan (CONRT) were computed using the Pinnacle treatment planning system. Dose-volume histograms were generated for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and oral cavity from which the dose parameters and the conformity index of the PTV were recorded for dosimetric comparisons among the plans with different beam arrangements. The dose distributions to the PTVs were similar among the 3 IMRT beam arrangements, whereas the differences were significant between IMRT-7R and CONRT plans. For the oral cavity dose, the 3 IMRT beam arrangements did not show significant difference. Compared with IMRT-7R, CONRT plan showed a significantly lower mean dose, V30 and V-40, whereas the V-60 was significantly higher. The 2 suggested alternative beam arrangements did not significantly reduce the oral cavity dose. The impact of varying the beam angles in IMRT of NPC did not give noticeable effect on the target and oral cavity. Compared with IMRT, the 2-D conventional radiotherapy irradiated a greater high-dose volume in the oral cavity.     

Localized prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk features treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and iodine-125 seed brachytherapy

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare the results of the combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer treatment in patients with intermediate and high risk of disease recurrence.Methods and MaterialsNinety-six patients were treated from January 1998 to December 2006. Twenty-four patients received combined treatment and 72 patients received brachytherapy alone. Patients were classified into intermediate or high risk of recurrence according to the D’Amico’s classification. The prescribed dose for brachytherapy was 145 Gy as monotherapy and 110 Gy for combined treatment. The dose of EBRT was 45 Gy over 5 weeks, with 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Results were analyzed based on Phoenix definition of biochemical recurrence, that is, nadir plus 2 ng/mL.ResultsBiochemical control was achieved by 96% (23 of 24) of patients receiving combined treatment and by 72% (52 of 72) in the group treated by brachytherapy alone (p < 0.015). The addition of EBRT resulted in a 94% biochemical disease-free survival at 5 years; and in brachytherapy alone group, the rate was 54% (p < 0.011). Mean followup was 96 months (24–132 months; confidence interval 95%: 90–102).ConclusionThis study shows that in patients with localized prostate cancer, with intermediate and high risk of biochemical recurrence, the addition of EBRT can confer a significant biochemical control advantage when added to brachytherapy.     

Four-year outcomes of hypofractionated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer allows dose escalation and delivery of higher biologically effective dose (BED). We evaluated the outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and HDR boost in a community setting.Methods and MaterialsBetween July 2003 and April 2008, 148 patients with prostate cancer were treated at Cancer Center of Irvine using two transperineal implants performed 1 week apart (22 Gy delivered in four fractions divided between two insertions and delivered twice daily), followed by IMRT (50.4 Gy). Hormonal therapy was given for 1 year to all patients with Gleason score of 8 or higher.ResultsPatient characteristics are as follows: median age at treatment, 71 years; American Joint Committee on Cancer Group IIB, 53%; Gleason score of 7, 41%; and Gleason score of 8 or higher, 14%. Median followup was 49 months, and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was 0.15 ng/mL. The 4-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was 96.8/81% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5 ng/mL criteria. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Practice Guidelines–defined recurrence risk groups, 4-year bDFS for low risk was 100/92.9%, intermediate risk was 100/86.7%, and high risk was 94/75.4% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5 ng/mL criteria. No statistically significant difference in bDFS was detected by either failure criteria based on risk group, lymph node risk, or initial PSA. Treatment was well tolerated. Subacute/late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were limited to 10% and 5%, respectively of all patients.ConclusionsProstate IMRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost was well tolerated with appropriate PSA response and bDFS at 4 years, demonstrated in a community setting. This treatment schema provides a high BED, comparable with hypofractionated prostate regimens previously reported in the literature. Higher BED delivery should be explored in further dose escalation studies.     

Primary rectal cancer treated with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy following external radiotherapy

An 80-year-old man with rectal cancer who had diabetes and angina was treated with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (30 Gy) following external radiotherapy (30 Gy). After this treatment, anal pain and bleeding improved greatly, and he was able to evacuate the bowels. However, the endoscopic biopsy taken five months after treatment revealed active cancer cells.     

Combined external and interstitial radiotherapy of vocal cord carcinoma

Since 1984 an Ir-192 source with a high dose rate has been used for interstitial implants, and since 1986 in the treatment of the tumor-bearing vocal cord in the organ-preserving management of larynx carcinoma. The combined percutaneous and interstitial treatment has been administered either as the primary treatment or after incomplete removal of the tumour. So fat 16 patients have been treated, two of them presented with tumours on both cords. All patients refused radical surgical interventions, four of them refused cord stripping too. The treatment method included external radiotherapy with a dose of 4600 to 5000 cGy to the larynx. One to two weeks after external XRT an interstitial implant into the vocal cord followed. Using two needles per cord, a boost dose of 1000 cGy was given to the tumour area. The median follow-up time is 21.3 months (range five to 49, calculated October 1990). So far no local or regional failures occurred. None of the patients had intra- or postoperative complications. All patients have preserved their voice. No severe late effects could be observed. The number of patients is very low, but the preservation of voice is high psychosocial value.     

Computed tomography-guided interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy for centrally located liver tumours: a single institution study

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical outcome of computed tomography (CT)-guided interstitial (IRT) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) in the treatment of unresectable primary and secondary liver malignancies. This report updates and expands our previously described experience with this treatment technique.

Methods

Forty-one patients with 50 tumours adjacent to the liver hilum and bile duct bifurcation were treated in 59 interventions of CT-guided IRT HDR BRT. The tumours were larger than 4 cm with a median volume of 84 cm³ (38–1,348 cm³). The IRT HDR BRT delivered a median total physical dose of 20.0 Gy (7.0–32.0 Gy) in twice daily fractions of median 7.0 Gy (4.0–10.0 Gy) in 19 patients and in once daily fractions of median 8.0 Gy (7.0–14.0 Gy) in 22 patients.

Results

With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the local control for metastatic hepatic tumours was 89 %, 73 % and 63 % at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. The local control for primary hepatic tumours was 90 %, 81 % and 50 % at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. Severe side effects occurred in 5.0 % of interventions with no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions

CT-guided IRT HDR BRT is a promising procedure for the radiation treatment of centrally located liver malignancies.

Key points

? Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IRT HDR BRT) is a promising treatment for central liver tumours ? CT-guided IRT HDR BRT is safe for treating extensive tumours ? CT-guided IRT HDR BRT could play a role in managing unresectable hepatic malignancies     

Prostate-specific antigen bounce after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy

PurposeTo report the frequency, timing, and magnitude of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce (PB) in patients who received high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (HDRB) plus hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (HypoRT) and to assess a possible correlation between PB and biochemical failure (BF).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer received 10 Gy single-fraction ¹⁹²Ir HDRB followed by 50 Gy in 20 daily fractions of HypoRT without androgen deprivation therapy. All patients had a minimum 2-year followup. The PB was defined as PSA elevation higher than 0.2 ng/mL from previous measurement with subsequent drop to pre-bounce level. The BF was defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL.ResultsA total of 114 patients treated between 2001 and 2009 were eligible for analysis. At a median followup of 66 months, the PB was found in 45 (39%) patients with a median time to bounce of 16 months (range, 3–76 months). The median time to PSA normalization after a PB was 9 months (range, 2–40 months). The median magnitude of PB was 0.45 ng/mL (range, 0.2–6.62). The BF occurred in 12 (10.5%) patients of whom three had a PB. Median time to BF was 52.5 months. Four patients (3.5%) in the PB group fit the criteria for BF.ConclusionsThe PB is common after HDRB and HypoRT and can occur up to 76 months after treatment. It can rarely fit the criteria for BF. The time to PB is shorter than the time to BF. There is a lower incidence of BF in patients with a PB. An acknowledgment of this phenomenon should be made when interpreting PSA results during followup to prevent unnecessary interventions.