Linear growth in prepubertal asthmatic children treated with montelukast, beclomethasone, or placebo: a 56-week randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Antileukotrienes and inhaled corticosteroids are asthma controller agents widely used in the treatment of pediatric asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of montelukast and beclomethasone on linear growth in prepubertal asthmatic children for 1 year. METHODS: This was a 30-center study of boys (6.4-9.4 years old) and girls (6.4-8.4 years old) at Tanner stage I with mild, persistent asthma. After a placebo run-in period, 360 patients were randomized in equal ratios to double-blind, double-dummy treatment with 5 mg of montelukast, 200 microg of beclomethasone twice daily (positive control), or placebo for 56 weeks; 90% of the patients completed the study. The primary end point was linear growth velocity, measured using a stadiometer. RESULTS: Linear growth rates were similar between the montelukast and placebo groups; the mean difference for the year was 0.03 cm. The mean growth rate with beclomethasone was significantly less than with placebo (-0.78 cm) or montelukast (0.81 cm) (P < .001 for both). Median percentage of days with beta-agonist use was greater with placebo (14.58%) vs montelukast (10.55%) or beclomethasone (6.65%) (P < .05 for all). More patients used oral corticosteroid rescue with placebo (34.7%) than with montelukast (25.0%) or beclomethasone (23.5%). An imbalance in bone marker levels was seen with beclomethasone but not with montelukast. CONCLUSION: In prepubertal asthmatic children, montelukast did not affect linear growth, whereas the growth rate with beclomethasone was significantly decreased during 1 year of treatment.     

Montelukast improves asthma control in asthmatic children maintained on inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Because of potential toxicities of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in pediatric asthma, alternative or steroid-sparing therapy is desirable. There are no previous studies evaluating montelukast's steroid-sparing effects in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether (1) montelukast as add-on therapy improves asthma symptom control and (2) montelukast provides steroid-sparing effects in children with asthma treated with low to moderate doses of ICS therapy. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 children ages 6 to 14 years with symptomatic asthma maintained on a stable low to moderate dose of ICSs were randomly assigned to receive montelukast or matching placebo for 24 weeks after a run-in period of 2 weeks (period I). During the trial, subjects kept daily asthma diary cards and monthly spirometry was performed. After a 4 week add-on period (period II), the subjects completed a 20-week (period III) ICS tapering period based on a predetermined protocol. RESULTS: In period II, the difference in the number of rescue-free days was significantly higher in the montelukast group (P = 0.0001), and the number of rescue-free days per week was also significantly higher in montelukast-treated subjects compared with placebo subjects (P = 0.002). In period III, the percentage reduction in ICS dose was not significant between montelukast and placebo (P = 0.10), but the montelukast group experienced an average 17% decrease in ICS dose and the control group experienced an average 64% increase in ICS dose. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast treatment significantly increased the number of rescue-free days in symptomatic children with asthma.     

Effect of montelukast on peripheral airflow obstruction in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is a widely used controller agent in childhood asthma. It is modestly effective in reducing symptoms, decreasing the need for rescue albuterol, and improving forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether montelukast therapy improves peripheral airway obstruction as measured by lung volumes, air trapping, airway resistance (Raw), and specific conductance (Sgaw). METHODS: Twenty-one children aged 9 to 18 years with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to receive montelukast (5 or 10 mg) or matching placebo daily for 8 weeks. Symptoms and albuterol use were recorded twice daily, and exhaled nitric oxide measurement, forced oscillometry, spirometry, and body box plethysmography (before and after beta-agonist use) were performed at randomization and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Circulating eosinophil counts and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were obtained at randomization and at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Montelukast-treated patients had lower residual volume (P = .05), residual volume-total lung capacity ratio (P = .04), Raw (P = .02), Sgaw (P = .03), and serum ECP levels (P = .02) at 8 weeks compared with those treated with placebo. There was a trend toward reduced daytime and nighttime albuterol use, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences in FEV1, FEV1-forced vital capacity ratio, exhaled nitric oxide levels, or daytime and nighttime symptom scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast therapy was associated with less air trapping, hyperinflation, and Raw and better Sgaw compared with placebo. Lower serum ECP levels, a surrogate measure of airway inflammation, were associated with improvements in lung function.     

Adherence with montelukast or fluticasone in a long-term clinical trial: results from the mild asthma montelukast versus inhaled corticosteroid trial

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with asthma therapy is common and may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dosing frequency and mode of delivery of therapy on adherence and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We examined adherence in patients with mild persistent asthma (15-85 years) enrolled in a randomized study of montelukast (10 mg once daily) or fluticasone (88 microg, 2 puffs twice daily) during a 12-week double-blind treatment period (DB), followed by a 36-week open-label trial (OL). Adherence was monitored using eDEM for montelukast/placebo and MDILog devices for fluticasone/placebo. RESULTS: Participants used at least 1 puff of inhaled therapy on 83.3% DB/76.8% OL of days and at least 1 dose of oral therapy on 77.5%/71.4% of days (P < .0001). Subjects used inhaled therapy less than prescribed on 49.5%/57.5% of days, compared with 22.5%/28.6% of days for oral therapy (P < .0001). In the DB, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and asthma rescue-free days (P = .02) and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .01) only for patients with FEV(1) < or = 86%. In the OL period, a dose-response relationship was observed with fluticasone and FEV(1) percent predicted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Whereas subjects were more likely to use inhaled fluticasone/placebo at least once a day, subjects were more likely to take once-daily oral montelukast/placebo as prescribed. Clinical outcomes were inconsistently associated with adherence levels. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients were less likely to be fully adherent with twice-daily therapy than with once-daily therapy, but most still achieved adequate asthma control.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of treatment with montelukast on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory properties of leukotriene modifiers and their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness have not been studied in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the changes in serum levels of inflammatory mediators, clinical efficacy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after treatment with montelukast. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 39 children with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma were randomly allocated to receive montelukast or placebo for 6 weeks. Main outcome measures were changes in serum concentrations of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1); peripheral blood eosinophil count; and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP). Asthma severity score, FEV(1), and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) for histamine were secondary end points. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, serum concentrations of IL-4, sICAM-1, and ECP and eosinophil blood counts significantly decreased after 6 weeks of treatment with montelukast. Montelukast significantly improved asthma control and FEV(1). Montelukast resulted in within-group significant decrease in levels of serum sIL-2R (611 vs. 483 pg/mL), IL-4 (0.123 vs 0.102 pg/mL), sICAM-1 (280 vs. 244 ng/mL), and ECP (74 vs. 59 microg/mL) and in eosinophil blood counts (349 vs. 310 cells/mm(3)). Mean FEV(1) value changed from 85% of predicted to 95% (P <.001) and for histamine (PC(20)H) from 2.8 mg/mL to 3.8 mg/mL (P <.001) after treatment with montelukast. There was no significant difference between montelukast and placebo recipients in the serum concentrations of sIL-2R and PC(20)H after treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provides clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma and decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Montelukast caused a statistically significant decrease of serum concentrations in cytokine, ICAM-1, and ECP and peripheral blood eosinophil counts over the 6-week treatment period. This observation raises the possibility that leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, may have effects on parameters of asthmatic inflammation.     

Response to montelukast among subgroups of children aged 2 to 14 years with asthma

BACKGROUND: Determining who responds to asthma therapies, particularly leukotriene modifiers, continues to be explored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patient characteristics predictive of response to montelukast. METHODS: We used data from 2 clinical trials in which children with asthma received either montelukast or placebo. Symptoms, beta-agonist use, and unanticipated health resource use caused by asthma were recorded in validated daily diaries for children 2 to 5 (n = 689) and 6 to 14 (n = 336) years old. We defined primary end points of days without asthma in 2- to 5-year-old patients (24 hours without symptoms, beta-agonist use, or asthma attack) and change in percent predicted FEV(1) in 6- to 14-year-old children. Asthma attack was defined by the use of rescue oral corticosteroids or by an unscheduled visit to a medical provider. Patients were grouped according to baseline characteristics, such as family history of asthma, personal history of allergy, frequency of asthma symptoms, eosinophilia, and concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn. We examined the stratum-specific effects of montelukast on the percentage of days without asthma, change in percent predicted FEV(1), asthma attack, and a variety of secondary symptom and FEV(1) end points. RESULTS: We did not identify characteristics that predicted response to montelukast in either preschool or 6- to 14-year-old children. These findings were consistent across all symptom and FEV(1) outcomes. There was also no differential response to montelukast in either age group when asthma attack was the outcome. CONCLUSION: The patient characteristics studied do not appear to provide an indication of who will benefit most from treatment with montelukast.     

Comparative efficacy and anti-inflammatory profile of once-daily therapy with leukotriene antagonist or low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate the use of preventative anti-inflammatory therapy for mild persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and anti-inflammatory profiles of a leukotriene receptor antagonist and a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: Twenty-one adult patients with mild asthma received 4 weeks of either once-daily inhaled hydrofluoroalkane triamcinolone acetonide (450 microg/day ex-actuator dose) or oral montelukast (10 mg/day) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study. Measurements were made before and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment. RESULTS: At the endpoint (after 4 weeks), triamcinolone and montelukast had improved the primary outcome (provocative dose of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) in comparison with placebo (P <.05), there being no difference between the treatments (1.09-fold; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.63). Triamcinolone was better than placebo or montelukast for effects on all other surrogate inflammatory markers (P <.05), including exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein, plasma intracellular circulating adhesion molecule 1, and plasma E-selectin. Both treatments improved (P <.05) morning and evening peak flow, nighttime beta2-agonist use, and symptoms in comparison with placebo, though triamcinolone was better than montelukast (P <.05) with regard to peak flow. Triamcinolone produced suppression (P <.05) of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine and serum osteocalcin. CONCLUSION: Once-daily inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene antagonist improved the primary outcome variable of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a similar degree.     

Comparisons of the complementary effect on exhaled nitric oxide of salmeterol vs montelukast in asthmatic children taking regular inhaled budesonide.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled, long-acting beta2-agonists or antileukotrienes are alternatives as add-on therapy for asthmatic children taking regular inhaled steroids. Any complementary effects would be relevant to the choice between these alternatives. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may reflect these effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare the control of FeNO provided by salmeterol or montelukast add-on therapy in asthmatic children undergoing regular maintenance treatment with a daily dose of 400 microg of budesonide. METHODS: The study included children with increased FeNO despite regular treatment with budesonide, 400 microg/d, and normal lung function. Montelukast, 5 mg/d, salmeterol, 50 microg twice daily, or placebo was compared as add-on therapy to budesonide, 400 microg, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. RESULTS: Twenty-two children completed the trial. The geometric mean FeNO level was 20 ppb (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-27 ppb) after salmeterol, which was significantly higher than after montelukast (mean, 15 ppb; 95% CI, 11-18 ppb; P = 0.002) and placebo (mean, 15 ppb; 95% CI, 10-21 ppb; P = 0.03). There was no difference in FeNO between the montelukast and placebo groups. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was significantly increased after salmeterol (mean, 2.63 L; 95% CI, 2.34-2.91 L) compared with placebo (mean, 2.48 L; 95% CI, 2.19-2.77 L). Montelukast (mean, 2.57 L; 95% CI, 2.33-2.80 L) was no different than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The FeNO levels were significantly higher after salmeterol add-on treatment compared with both placebo and montelukast add-on treatment. Salmeterol significantly improved lung function (FEV1) compared with placebo and nonsignificantly compared with montelukast. Montelukast failed to reduce FeNO and improve lung function compared with placebo in this group of children taking regular budesonide, 400 microg.     

The efficacy of montelukast in the treatment of cat allergen-induced asthma in children

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is a leukotriene antagonist approved for the treatment of childhood asthma in children age 2 years and older. There are limited studies on its effects on allergic asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate montelukast's effects on upper and lower airway responses to intense cat allergen exposure. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial 18 subjects aged 6 to 14 years with cat-induced asthma were randomly assigned to receive 1 week each of either montelukast or placebo, followed by a 1-hour cat challenge in an environmental exposure unit. Upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms were rated, and spirometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed. Challenges were stopped early if the subject became too uncomfortable or had a greater than 50% decrease in FEV1. RESULTS: Overall changes in FEV1 were significantly different with montelukast treatment and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.02; adjusted P =.01). Lower respiratory tract symptom scores were significantly reduced with montelukast versus placebo (P =.007) but lost significance after adjusting for allergen level (P =.16). Challenge length was significantly longer with montelukast versus placebo (P <.001) and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.019). Montelukast did not significantly affect upper respiratory responses, as measured by means of symptom scores (P =.43) and changes in acoustic rhinometry (P =.078). CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo in attenuating lower respiratory responses and extending challenge length when cat-sensitive children with mild persistent asthma were exposed to high levels of cat allergen.     

Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by montelukast in aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, was reported to have a protective effect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) is characterized by overproduction of cysteinyl-leukotrienes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the response to exercise and the effect of montelukast on EIB in AIA as compared to aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). METHODS: A placebo-controlled, double blind, cross-over randomized study was performed in 19 AIA and 21 ATA patients with stable asthma. A single dose of montelukast (10 mg) or placebo (PL), was given orally one hour prior to exercise challenge. FEV1 was measured before and 5, 10, 15 min after exercise and then at 15-minute intervals for 4 h. Urinary LTE4 excretion and blood eosinophil count were measured at baseline, 2 h and 4 h following exercise challenge. RESULTS: Positive bronchial response to exercise was observed in 47.5% of all patients studied. Exercise led to almost identical maximal fall in FEV1 in AIA and ATA patients (23.5% +/- 6.8% vs. 21.8% +/- 12.0%, respectively; P = 0.7). Montelukast, as compared to PL, significantly attenuated EIB in 63.2% of 19 patients with positive exercise test preceded by PL. The mean of maximum fall in FEV1 from the pre-exercise value was 10.2% +/- 13.8 after montelukast as compared to 22.5% +/- 10.2 after placebo (P < 0.001). No significant differences between protective effect of montelukast was observed in AIA as compared to ATA patients (P = 0.63, anova). Urinary LTE4 excretion showed no change following exercise, irrespective of the result of the test in all subjects. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIA and ATA react similarly to exercise challenge and obtain similar protection against EIB by montelukast.     

Efficacy of montelukast during the allergy season in patients with chronic asthma and seasonal aeroallergen sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast has proven efficacy in the treatment of chronic asthma and seasonal allergic rhinitis, but it has not been evaluated in the subpopulation of asthmatic patients with seasonal asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of montelukast treatment in improving the control of asthma symptoms during the allergy season in patients with active asthma and seasonal aeroallergen sensitivity. METHODS: Adults with a history of chronic asthma who are also symptomatic during the allergy season and with skin test sensitivity to seasonal aeroallergens were enrolled in a randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study with a 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period followed by 3 weeks of double-blind treatment during the spring of 2004. After the run-in period, eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral montelukast (10 mg) or placebo. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, beta-agonist use, and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily using an electronic diary. The primary end point was mean change from baseline to week 3 in the daytime asthma symptom score. RESULTS: Of 455 randomized patients, 433 completed the study. Compared with placebo, treatment with montelukast resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in the daytime asthma symptom score (-0.54 vs -0.34; P = .002) and in beta-agonist use, nighttime symptoms, and peak expiratory flow rates. Few patients in the montelukast and placebo groups discontinued study participation because of asthma (1.3% and 3.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic asthma and seasonal aeroallergen sensitivity, montelukast treatment provided significant asthma control during the allergy season compared with placebo.     

Effect of combined montelukast and desloratadine on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen

BACKGROUND: The early asthmatic response (EAR) to inhaled allergen results from IgE-mediated release of multiple mast-cell mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine, both of which cause bronchoconstriction. Combination therapy directed at blocking the effects of both mediators might protect against the EAR better than either therapy alone. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effect of desloratadine and montelukast, administered alone and in combination, on the EAR to inhaled allergen. METHODS: Ten adults with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma participated in a randomized, 4-way crossover study design comparing placebo, 5 mg of desloratadine, 10 mg of montelukast, and the combination administered at 26 hours and 2 hours before each allergen challenge conducted at least 7 days apart. The primary end point was the concentration of allergen that resulted in a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20). RESULTS: The geometric mean allergen PC20 (mean log +/- SEM) for combination therapy, montelukast, desloratadine, and placebo was 697 U/mL (2.8433 +/- 0.3253), 338 U/mL (2.5295 +/- 0.2979), 123 U/mL (2.0883 +/- 0.2102), and 104 U/mL (2.0166 +/- 0.2553), respectively (n = 9; P < .00001, ANOVA). Montelukast increased the allergen PC20 4.8-fold, and combination therapy increased the allergen PC20 8.9-fold. The effect of the combination was greater than that with montelukast alone (P < .02). Desloratadine treatment was no different than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The early response to inhaled allergen was unchanged after desloratadine therapy and partially inhibited with montelukast therapy. The combination of desloratadine and montelukast provided superior efficacy to either blocker administered alone. Investigations into the possible mechanisms of the enhanced inhibition are necessary.     

Low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for first-line treatment of persistent asthma: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Both inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers are used in the maintenance treatment of persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate (FP) and montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients by using short-acting beta2-agonists alone to treat persistent asthma. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 533 patients (>15 years old) with persistent asthma who remained symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone were treated with FP (88 microg [2 puffs of 44 microg] twice daily) or montelukast (10 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with treatment with montelukast, treatment with FP resulted in significantly greater improvements at endpoint in morning predose FEV(1) (22.9% vs 14.5%, P <.001), forced midexpiratory flow (0.66 vs 0.41 L/sec, P <.001), forced vital capacity (0.42 vs 0.29 L, P =.002), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (68.5 vs 34.1 L/min, P <.001), and evening PEF (53.9 vs 28.7 L/min, P <.001). Similar improvements in PEF were observed in patients with milder asthma (>70%-80% predicted FEV(1)). At endpoint, FP was more effective than montelukast at decreasing rescue albuterol use (3.1 puffs/day vs 2.3 puffs/day, P <.001), asthma symptom scores (-0.85 [48.6% decrease] vs -0.60 [30.5%], P <.001), and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (-0.64 awakenings/night [62% decrease] vs -0.48 awakenings/night [47.5%], P =.023), and FP increased the percentage of symptom-free days (32.0% vs 18.4% of days, P <.001) compared with montelukast. The adverse event and asthma exacerbation profiles for FP and montelukast were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose FP is more effective than montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with persistent asthma who are undertreated and remain symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone.     

Clinical safety and tolerability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in controlled clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 6 years

OBJECTIVE: Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist administered orally once daily for treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children. A comprehensive analysis of safety data from double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with montelukast has not been previously reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis of safety data from 11 multicentre, randomized, controlled montelukast Phase IIb and III trials and five long-term extension studies was performed. A total of 3386 adult patients (aged 15-85 years) and 336 paediatric patients (aged 6-14 years) were enrolled in the trials; 2031 adults received montelukast for up to 4.1 years, and 257 children received montelukast for up to 1.8 years. Summary statistics comparing incidences of adverse events among treatment groups were calculated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events among montelukast-treated patients, both adult and paediatric, was similar to that among patients receiving placebo. There were no clinically relevant differences in individual adverse events, including infectious upper respiratory conditions and transaminase elevations, between montelukast and placebo groups. Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred with similar frequencies during placebo, montelukast and inhaled beclomethasone therapy. No dose-related adverse effects of montelukast were observed in adults treated with dosages as high as 200 mg per day (20 times the recommended dose) for 5 months. This tolerability profile montelukast observed in clinical trials has been generally reflected in the post-marketing safety experience seen to date. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate a tolerability profile for montelukast similar to placebo during both short-term and long-term administration, even at doses substantially higher than the recommended clinical dose of 10 mg once daily for adults and 5 mg once daily for children aged 6-14 years.     

Omalizumab, anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of severe allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: A recombinant humanized anti-IgE mAb, omalizumab, forms complexes with free IgE, blocking its interaction with mast cells and basophils; as a consequence, it might be effective in the treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of inhaled corticosteroid-dependent asthma. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 525 subjects with severe allergic asthma requiring daily inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to receive placebo or omalizumab subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on baseline IgE level and body weight. Inhaled corticosteroid doses were kept stable over the initial 16 weeks of treatment and tapered during a further 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Omalizumab treatment resulted in significantly fewer asthma exacerbations per subject and in lower percentages of subjects experiencing an exacerbation than placebo treatment during the stable steroid phase (0.28 vs 0.54 [P =.006] and 14.6% vs 23.3% [P =.009], respectively) and during the steroid reduction phase (0.39 vs 0.66 [P =.003] and 21.3% vs 32.3% [P =.004], respectively). Beclomethasone dipropionate reduction was significantly greater with omalizumab treatment than with placebo (median 75% vs 50% [P <.001]), and beclomethasone dipropionate discontinuation was more likely with omalizumab (39.6% vs 19.1% [P <.001]). Improvements in asthma symptoms and pulmonary function occurred along with a reduction in rescue beta-agonist use. Omalizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse-events profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSION: The addition of omalizumab to standard asthma therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and decreases inhaled corticosteroid and rescue medication use.     

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination compared with montelukast for the treatment of persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic disease characterized by inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Medications that are able to effectively treat both components are advantageous. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta2-agonist combination product with a leukotriene antagonist for initial maintenance therapy in patients who were symptomatic while receiving short-acting beta2-agonists alone. METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study was conducted in 432 patients 15 years of age and older with persistent asthma who were symptomatic on short-acting beta2-agonists alone. Fluticasone propionate 100 microg and salmeterol 50 microg combination product (FSC) twice daily or montelukast 10 mg once daily was administered. RESULTS: At endpoint, compared with montelukast, FSC significantly increased morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (0.61 +/- 0.03 L vs 0.32 +/- 0.03 L), morning peak expiratory flow rate (peak expiratory flow rate; 81.4 +/- 5.9 L/minute vs 41.9 +/- 4.8 L/minute), evening peak expiratory flow rate (64.6 +/- 5.3 L/minute vs 38.8 +/- 4.7 L/minute), the percentage of symptom-free days (40.3 +/- 2.9% vs 27.0 +/- 2.7%), the percentage of rescue-free days (53.4 +/- 2.8% vs 26.7 +/- 2.5%), and the percentage of nights with no awakenings (29.8 +/- 2.5% vs 19.6 +/- 2.1%) (P < or = 0.011, all comparisons). At endpoint, FSC significantly reduced asthma symptom scores (-1.0 +/- 0.1 vs -0.7 +/- 0.1) and rescue albuterol use (-3.6 +/- 0.2 puffs/day vs -2.2 +/- 0.2 puffs/day) compared with montelukast (P < 0.001). At endpoint, patients treated with FSC also had a significantly greater improvement in quality of life scores and were more satisfied with their treatment compared with montelukast-treated patients (P < or = 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Initial maintenance therapy with FSC provides greater improvement in asthma control and patient satisfaction than montelukast.     

Leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, can reduce the need for inhaled steroid while maintaining the clinical stability of asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have efficacy in chronic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of montelukast could lead to a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dose without a significant decrease in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). METHODS: After a 4-week run-in period, 191 moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients whose asthma had been well controlled with daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy (beclometasone dipropionate 800 to 1600 micro g/day), were randomly assigned to one of two treatments - placebo (n = 98) or montelukast 10 mg once daily (n = 93) - for a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind, treatment period. At the beginning of the active treatment period, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid was halved in all of the patients. In addition, the inhaled corticosteroid dose was subsequently titrated every 8 weeks, based on PEFR, asthma symptoms and beta-agonist use. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of a 50% reduction in inhaled corticosteroid use, morning PEFR increased by 5.3 +/- 32.3 L/min from baseline in patients receiving montelukast and significantly decreased by 6.9 +/- 29.0 L/min in those receiving placebo (P = 0.035). In addition, evening PEFR significantly decreased by 9.8 +/- 28.5 L/min (P = 0.003) in the placebo group, but was maintained in the montelukast group. In spite of a subsequent 50% reduction in the inhaled corticosteroid dose every 8 weeks, morning and evening PEFRs were maintained over the 24-week treatment period in the montelukast group; PEFR significantly decreased in the placebo group. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to morning PEFR, therapy score and asthmatic score at weeks 8, 16 and 24, as well as evening PEFR at week 8. However, the symptom scores were not significantly different between the two groups or within each group. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that montelukast reduces the need for inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining asthma control over a 24-week period. Therefore, montelukast may be useful for long-term treatment in patients with asthma who require high doses of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Effects of 24-week add-on treatment with ciclesonide and montelukast on small airways inflammation in asthma

BackgroundEosinophilic inflammation of the small airways is a key process in asthma that often smolders in treated patients. The long-term effects of add-on therapy on the persistent inflammation in the small airways remain unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of add-on therapy with either ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid with extrafine particles, or montelukast on small airway inflammation.MethodsSixty patients with stable asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroid treatment were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, parallel comparison study of 24-week add-on treatment with ciclesonide or montelukast. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: ciclesonide (n = 19), montelukast (n = 22), or no add-on as controls (n = 19). At baseline and at weeks 4, 12, and 24, extended nitric oxide analysis; pulmonary function tests, including impulse oscillometry; blood eosinophil counts; and asthma control tests (ACTs) were performed.ResultsA total of 18 patients in the ciclesonide group, 19 in the montelukast group, and 15 in the control group completed the study and were analyzed. With repeated-measures analysis of variance, ciclesonide produced a significant decrease in alveolar nitric oxide and a significant improvement in ACT scores over time. Montelukast produced significant decreases in alveolar nitric oxide concentrations and blood eosinophil counts over time and slightly improved ACT scores, whereas no such changes were observed in the control group. Alveolar nitric oxide concentrations with ciclesonide and reactance area at low frequencies with montelukast produced greater improvements over time compared with control.ConclusionCiclesonide add-on therapy and montelukast add-on therapy may act differently, but both separately can improve small airway abnormalities and provide better asthma control.Trial Registrationumin.ac.jp/ctr Identifier: UMIN000001083     

Protective effect of montelukast on lower and upper respiratory tract responses to short-term cat allergen exposure.

BACKGROUND: Challenge with short-term exposure to airborne cat allergen in sensitized patients produces pulmonary function changes and rhinitis symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of montelukast, 10 mg, for patients with concomitant asthma and allergic rhinitis as demonstrated by protection against both lower and upper airway responses to cat allergen challenge. METHODS: This randomized, crossover study treated patients with montelukast vs placebo during two 2-week, double-blind treatment periods, separated by a 1-week washout period. After each treatment period, patients underwent a 60-minute or less exposure to high levels of airborne cat allergen. Lower and upper airway responses were measured by spirometry and symptom scores. RESULTS: Of 52 patients with data from both treatment arms, 79% of patients taking montelukast and 67% taking placebo were exposed to the full 60-minute allergen challenge. Montelukast provided significant (P < or = .001) protection against allergen challenge in the lower airway coprimary end point of area under the curve during challenge (AUC0-60min) for percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second: mean of 10.5% per hour and 14.7% per hour for montelukast and placebo, respectively. Although the effect on the overall nasal symptoms score (NSS) coprimary end point of AUC0-60min was not statistically significance (P = .12), nasal congestion during the challenge and NSS during recovery showed statistically significant (P = .048) protection by montelukast. Additional analyses of simultaneous lower and upper airway responses showed that more patients taking montelukast (22, 43%) vs placebo (13, 26%) were protected from both asthma and rhinitis (P = .02), with an odds ratio of 2.24 (95% CI, 1.16-4.32) in favor of montelukast. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast has a protective effect against both lower and upper airway responses during exposure to high levels of cat allergen.