Exogenous hormone use and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study

The association between the use of exogenous hormones as either oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer incidence was examined in the Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS) among 62,573 women aged 55 to 69 years. Information on these types of exogenous hormone use and other risk factors was collected by mailed questionnaire. During 3.3 years of follow-up, 471 incident breast cancer cases were identified. After adjustment for traditional breast cancer risk factors, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer was 1.09 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.79–1.48) for women who ever used OCs cf women who never used OCs. The relative rates (with CIs) for women who used OCs for a period < 5 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years, and 15+ years were 0.97 (0.61–1.55), 1.20 (0.69–2.07), 1.03 (0.60–1.77), and 1.96 (0.99–3.89), respectively. The test for trend was not significant (P=0.13). There was no evidence of any association between the number of years between the first and the last use of OCs and breast cancer incidence. In the subgroup of women with first-degree relatives with breast cancer, the RR for breast cancer associated with ever use of OCs was 1.51 (CI=0.67–3.41), whereas in the remaining women, the RR was 0.97 (CI=0.73–1.27). Ever-use of HRT compared with never-use was not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk in the multivariate analysis (RR=0.99, CI=0.68–1.43). Also, the number of years of HRT use was not associated with an increased breast cancer risk (trend P=0.83), nor was the number of years between the first and the last use of HRT and breast cancer incidence. One subgroup of women in which the use of HRT seemed associated (but not significantly) with an increase in breast cancer risk was women with an induced menopause (RR=1.72, CI=0.95–3.12). The RR of breast cancer for women who had ever used both OCs and HRT, compared with women who never used these exogenous hormones was 1.00 (CI=0.51–1.94). From this study, it cannot be concluded that the use of exogenous hormones is a strong risk factor for the development of postmenopausal breast cancer.Since the acceptance of this paper, two other papers have been published on HRT and breast cancer. For HRT (estrogen alone), one supports our finding of no association (Stanford et al, JAMA 1995; 274: 137–42) and one did find a positive association for current use (Colditz et al, New Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1589–93), most pronounced in older women with longer durations of use. With regard to use of combined estrogen-progestin HRT, the results in both papers were comparable to those for estrogen alone. More research on (combinations of) types of hormones is needed.This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society.     

A pooled analysis of case-control studies of thyroid cancer¶ III. Oral contraceptives, menopausal replacement therapy and other female hormones

Objective: The relations between oral contraceptives (OC), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for menopause, and other female hormone use and thyroid cancer risk was analyzed using the original data from 13 studies from North America, Asia and Europe.Methods: Based on 2,132 cases and 3,301 controls, odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained by conditional regression models, conditioning on study and age at diagnosis, and adjusting for age, radiation exposure and parity.Results: Overall, 808 (38%) cases versus 1,290 (39%) controls had ever used OCs, corresponding to an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4). There was no relation with duration of use, age at first use, or use before first birth. The OR was significantly increased for current OC users (OR=1.5, 95% 1.0 to 2.1), but declined with increasing time since stopping (OR=1.1 for >10 years since stopping). The association was stronger for papillary cancers (OR=1.6 for current users) than for other histologic types. No significant heterogeneity was observed across studies or geographic areas. Eight studies had data on HRT, for a total of 1,305 cases and 2,300 controls: 110 (8%) cases and 205 (9%) controls reported ever using HRT (OR=0.8; 95% CI 0.6 to 1.1). The ORs were 1.6 (95% to 0.9 to 2.9) for use of fertility drugs, and 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1) for lactation suppression treatment.Conclusions: The studies considered in these analyses include most of the epidemiological data on the role of exogenous hormone use in the etiology of thyroid cancer, and they provide reassuring evidence on the absence of an association of practical relevance. The moderate excess risk in current OC users, if not due to increased surveillance for thyroid masses among OC users, is similar to that described for breast cancer, and would imply a role of female hormones on thyroid cancer promotion. There was no indication of increased thyroid cancer risk 10 or more years after discontinuing OC use.     

Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer.

The relationship between oral contraceptives (OCs), menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and the risk of colorectal cancer was investigated in a case-control study conducted in northern Italy between 1985 and 1992 on 709 women with incident colorectal cancer and 992 controls admitted to hospital for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic, non-digestive tract, non-hormone-related disorders. A reduced risk of colorectal cancer was observed in women who had ever used OCs [multivariate odds ratio (OR) = 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.92]. The OR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.27-1.02) for use over 2 years. For women ever using HRT, the multivariate OR was 0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.66). The risk was inversely related to duration of use, with ORs of 0.46 for 2 years or less and 0.25 for more than 2 years of use. No consistent pattern of trends was observed with time since first or last use. This study provides further evidence that OC and HRT do not increase, and possibly decrease, the risk of colorectal cancer. These results, if confirmed, would have important implications for the ultimate risk-benefit assessment of female hormone preparations.     

Reproductive factors,hormone use and gastric cancer risk: The Singapore Chinese Health Study

Gastric cancer incidence varies greatly worldwide, but is consistently twice as high in men than in women. The hormone‐related factors hypothesized to be associated with lower risk of gastric cancer in women have not been fully explored in populations with a high background risk of gastric cancer. The Singapore Chinese Health Study (SCHS) is a prospective cohort study in which 34,022 of the participants enrolled between 1993 and 1998 were women between 45 and 74 years of age. Information on reproductive histories, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and oral contraceptive (OC) use was collected through in‐person interviews at baseline. As of December 31, 2013, 269 incident gastric cancer cases were identified. Multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate gastric cancer risk associations. Older age at natural menopause (≥55 versus <45 years: HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25–0.99), type of menopause (other versus natural: HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27–0.87) and greater years of menstrual cycling (fourth versus first quartile: HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46–0.96) were associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer. Ever use of OCs and HRT was also associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer; the multivariable‐adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.40 (0.17–0.90) for use of HRT >3 years and 0.67 (0.47–0.94) for ever use of OCs, compared with never use. Reproductive factors associated with a longer window of fertility and the use of exogenous hormones were shown to reduce gastric cancer development in a cohort of Chinese women with a high background risk of gastric cancer.     

Exogenous hormones,reproductive history,and colon cancer (Seattle,Washington, USA)

The associations between exogenous hormones, reproductive history, and colon cancer were investigated in a case-control study among women aged 30–62 years. The study was conducted in the Seattle, Washington (USA) metropolitan area between 1985 and 1989 and included 193 incident cases of colon cancer and 194 controls. There was little overall association between colon cancer and oral contraceptive use, parity, age at first birth, hysterectomy or oophorectomy status, or age at menopause. Use of noncontraceptive hormones at or after age 40, most likely hormone replacement therapy (HRT), was associated with decreased risk of colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.60, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.35–1.01), particularly among women with more than five years of use (OR=0.47, 95 percent CI=0.24–0.91). While results from previous studies have not been consistent, any protective effect of HRT against colon cancer would be important given the continuing debate over its potential risks and benefits.Support for this study was provided by grant CA44790. Mr Jacobs was supported by the Cancer Prevention Training Grant T32 CA09661. This study was performed at the Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.     

Hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history, and colon cancer: a multicenter, case-control study in the United States

Hormonal factors have been inconsistently associated with coloncancer risk in women. The associations between reproductive events, menstrualfactors, exogenous hormones, and colon cancer were evaluated in a largecase-control study (894 female cases and 1,120 female age-matchedpopulation-based controls) in the United States, stratifying by age atdiagnosis, tumor site, family history and other potential risk factors.Overall, higher parity was associated with a marginally decreased risk ofcolon cancer (five or more births compared with nulliparous: odds ratio [OR]= 0.75, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-1.06) after adjusting forage at diagnosis, family history of colorectal cancer, vigorous lifetimephysical activity, body mass index (BMI) (wt/ht 1.5 ), total energy intake,and aspirin use. No important associations were observed for otherreproductive or menstrual events. An inverse association between recent useof hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and colon cancer was observed (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.56-0.89). Although interaction termswere not significant, this inverse association appeared to be more pronouncedfor those with an older age at diagnosis; for those without a first-degreerelative with colorectal cancer; and for those with a relatively low BMI. Thereduced risk associated with HRT use did not appear to be explained by otherbehaviors related to HRT use.     

Update on the effect of exogenous hormone use on glioma risk in women: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies

Various studies have confirmed the important roles of endogenous hormones in the development of gliomas, while the roles of exogenous hormones remain controversial. Based on case-control studies and cohort studies, a meta-analysis was exerted to explore the effect of two exogenous hormones use (HRT: hormone replacement therapy; OC: oral contraceptives) on glioma risk. 16 eligible studies, including 11 case-control studies and 5 cohort studies, containing 8055027 women, were included in our study. All included studies have reported the relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We use the fixed-effects model to calculate the estimated overall risk. In case-control studies, the risk of glioma was lower in women who had ever been treated with an exogenous hormone than in the control group (HRT: OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99; OC: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91–1.07). In research of cohort studies, similar results have been obtained (HRT: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83–1.08; OC: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.84). Our study further confirmed that the use of exogenous hormones has an important impact on the risk of glioma in women. However, more prospective studies are needed to further confirm this conclusion.     

Recreational physical activity and risk of papillary thyroid cancer (United States)

Objective: Exercise has been hypothesized to influence cancer risk through a variety of mechanisms including hormonal, metabolic and immunologic effects, yet its relation with the risk of thyroid cancer has not been examined. We conducted a population-based case–control study in women aged 18–64 in three counties of western Washington State to assess the relation of recreational physical activity with risk of papillary thyroid cancer. Methods: Of 558 women with thyroid cancer of the follicular epithelium diagnosed during 1988–1994 who were identified as eligible, 468 (83.9%) were interviewed; this analysis was restricted to women with papillary histology (n = 410). Controls (n = 574) were identified by random digit dialing, with a response proportion of 73.6%. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and associated confidence intervals (CI) estimating the relative risk of papillary thyroid cancer associated with various aspects of recreational exercise. Results: Risk of thyroid cancer was reduced among women who reported that they engaged in regular recreational exercise during the 2 years before diagnosis relative to women who did not report exercise during that time period (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98). A similar risk reduction was noted among women who reported having exercised regularly between ages 12 and 21 (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.64–1.1). However, no clear associations with aspects of recreational activity, including average hours exercised per week or weekly energy expenditure, were observed. Conclusions: These results provide some initial support for the hypothesis that physical activity may reduce risk of thyroid cancer.     

Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for thyroid cancer in Los Angeles County females.

We conducted an individually matched case-control study (292 pairs) of female thyroid cancer patients to examine the role of reproductive history and exogenous hormones in this disease. Radiation treatment to the head or neck [28 cases and 2 controls exposed; odds ratio (OR), 14.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-121.3] and certain benign thyroid diseases (including adolescent thyroid enlargement, goiter, and nodules or tumors) were strongly associated with thyroid cancer. Irregular menstruation increased risk (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7). Age at menarche and pregnancy history were not related to disease. Women with natural menopause and hysterectomized women without oophorectomy had no increase in risk, but disease risk was elevated in women with bilateral oophorectomy (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.1-38.1). In general, use of oral contraceptives and other exogenous estrogens was not associated with thyroid cancer. However, risk increased with number of pregnancies in women using lactation suppressants (P = 0.03) and decreased with duration of breastfeeding (P = 0.04). These data provide only limited support for the hypothesis that reproductive and hormonal exposures are responsible for the marked excess of thyroid cancer risk in adult females.     

Sex hormones and the risk of keratinocyte cancers among women in the United States: A population‐based case–control study

Men are at a higher risk of developing both squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) than women, but there is emerging evidence that women may be experiencing greater increases in the incidence rates of these malignancies than men. One possible explanation is the expanding use of sex steroids among women, although only a few studies have examined this hypothesis. As part of a population‐based, case–control study of women in New Hampshire, USA, we sought to evaluate the risk of SCC, BCC, and early‐onset BCC in relation to exogenous and endogenous sex hormones. We found that oral contraceptive (OC) use was associated with an increased risk of SCC (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.8) and BCC (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0‐1.8), particularly high estrogen dose (>50 mg) OC use. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use also related to SCC, with an elevated OR largely for progestin use (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.8). Additionally, both OC use and combination HRT use were associated with more aggressive BCC subtypes. In contrast, menstrual and reproductive history did not appear to influence keratinocyte cancer risk in our data. Our findings provide evidence that use of sex steroids may enhance risk of keratinocyte cancer.     

Hormone use and risk for lung cancer: a pooled analysis from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO)

Background:

The association between oral contraceptive (OC) use, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and lung cancer risk in women is still debated.

Methods:

We performed a pooled analysis of six case–control studies (1961 cases and 2609 controls) contributing to the International Lung Cancer Consortium. Potential associations were investigated with multivariable unconditional logistic regression and meta-analytic models. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to investigate lung cancer risk across histologic types.

Results:

A reduced lung cancer risk was found for OC (odds ratio (OR)=0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.97) and HRT ever users (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.66–0.90). Both oestrogen only and oestrogen+progestin HRT were associated with decreased risk (OR=0.76; 95% CI: 0.61–0.94, and OR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.49–0.88, respectively). No dose-response relationship was observed with years of OC/HRT use. The greatest risk reduction was seen for squamous cell carcinoma (OR=0.53; 95% CI: 0.37–0.76) in OC users and in both adenocarcinoma (OR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.66–0.95) and small cell carcinoma (OR=0.37; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71) in HRT users. No interaction with smoking status or BMI was observed.

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that exogenous hormones can play a protective role in lung cancer aetiology. However, given inconsistencies with epidemiological evidence from cohort studies, further and larger investigations are needed for a more comprehensive view of lung cancer development in women.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer in former users of oral contraceptives--The Norwegian Women and Cancer study

Combined estrogen-progestin menopausal therapy (HRT) and combined estrogen-progestin contraceptives (OC) both increase breast cancer risk during current use and a few years after. We investigated risk of breast cancer in women who were users of HRT dependant on former history of OC use in a large, national population-based cohort study, the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC). Exposure information was collected through postal questionnaires. Based on follow-up of 30,118 postmenopausal women by linkage to national registers of cancer, deaths, and emigration we revealed 540 incident breast cancer cases between 1996 and 2004. Compared to never users of either drugs current use of HRT gave a significant (p = 0.002) higher risk of breast cancer in former OC users, RR = 2.45 (95% CI 1.92-3.12), than among never users of OCs, RR = 1.67 (1.32-2.12). Relative risk of current use of HRT was similar for estrogen only and combinations with progestin added in ever users of OCs. The increased risk of breast cancer in current HRT users with a history of former OC use could have potential great impact on postmenopausal breast cancer risk as the proportion of postmenopausal women with former OC use will continue to increase.     

Exogenous hormones and colorectal cancer risk in Canada: associations stratified by clinically defined familial risk of cancer

Objective This work assessed associations between colorectal cancer risk and postmenopausal/contraceptive hormones; subgroup analyses included women with a clinically defined family history of cancer. Methods A population based case–control study of incident colorectal cancer was conducted among women aged 20–74 years in Ontario and Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada. Incident cases (n = 1,404) were selected from provincial cancer registries and controls (n = 1,203) were identified through property records, and other means, between January 1997 and April 2006. Family history of cancer, exogenous hormone-use, and other risk factors were collected via self-administered questionnaires. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Decreased risks of colorectal cancer were observed with ever-users of: hormonal contraceptives (OR: 0.77; CI: 0.65–0.91), estrogen-only postmenopausal hormones (OR: 0.60; CI: 0.47–0.75), and estrogen–progestin postmenopausal hormones (OR: 0.70; CI: 0.52–0.95). Risk estimates were similar between women with and without a strong familial history of cancer. Age at initiation of hormonal contraceptives was associated with colorectal cancer risk; women who initiated use at younger ages (age <22 years: OR: 0.60; CI: 0.47–0.77) experienced a greater reduced risk of disease than women who initiated use at later ages (age 30+: OR: 0.92; CI: 0.68–1.24; p _trend: 0.0026). Conclusions These results indicate that exogenous hormone-use is linked with reduced risk of colorectal cancer among women with a strong familial risk of cancer, consistent with observations on population samples of sporadic colorectal cancer cases. A potential age-effect for use of hormonal contraceptives warrants further attention.     

Diet and the risk of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Sweden and Norway

A population-based case-control study was conducted in two regions ofSweden and Norway to investigate the association between dietary habits andthe risk of thyroid cancer. The consumption of selected foods was reported ina self-completed food-frequency questionnaire by 246 cases withhistologically confirmed papillary (n = 209) and follicular (n = 37) thyroidcarcinoma, and 440 age- and gender-matched controls. Odds ratios (OR) andtheir 95 percent confidence interval (CI) were calculated as estimates of therelative risk using conditional logistic regression. High consumption ofbutter (OR = 1.6, CI = 1.1-2.5) and cheese (OR = 1.5, CI = 1.0-2.4) wasassociated with increased risks. Residence in areas of endemic goiter inSweden was associated with an elevated risk, especially among women (OR =2.5, CI = 1.3-4.9). High consumption of cruciferous vegetables was associatedwith increased risk only in persons who ever lived in such areas. A decreasedrisk was associated with consumption of iodized salt in northern Norway, andwith use of iodized salt during adolescence among women (OR = 0.6, CI =0.6-1.0). The results of this study suggest a role of diet and environment inthe risk of thyroid cancer.     

Parity and risk of thyroid cancer: a nested case-control study of a nationwide Swedish cohort

The association between parity and risk of thyroid cancer was examined in a case-control study nested within a cohort of Swedish women born 1925–60. A total of 1,409 cases of thyroid cancer were compared with 7,019 agematched controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as estimates of relative risk. A weak association was found between parity and risk of thyroid cancer (OR for ever-parous women cf nulliparous was 1.1, CI=1.0–1.3). For the subset of papillary cancers, there was a significantly increased risk (OR for ever-parous cf nulliparous = 1.3, CI=1.0–1.6), and among women diagnosed at the age of 50 or older, there was a positive linear trend with increasing number of livebirths. Women during the first year after a livebirth had an increased risk of thyroid cancer compared with women who delivered 10 or more years before; this association was most prominent among uniparous women (OR=2.5, CI=1.1–5.9). An increased risk was also apparent for age over 20 years at livebirth (among uniparous women) and age over 25 years at last livebirth (among multiparous women). A negligible effect of parity on thyroid cancer risk was seen, but each livebirth may have a short-term and age-dependent promoting effect.Authors are with the Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (M.R. Galanti, M. Lambe, A. Ebbora, R. Sparda B. Pettersson): Department of Social Medicine, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden (M. Lambe); Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA (A. Ekbom). Address correspondence to Dr M. Rosaria Galanti, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. This work was supported in part by grant n. 3136-B92-02XBB from the Swedish Cancer Society.     

Reproductive and menstrual history and papillary thyroid cancer risk: the San Francisco Bay Area thyroid cancer study.

Thyroid cancer rates are three times higher in women than men during the period between puberty and menopause, suggesting that the etiology of thyroid cancer may be related to female sex hormones and reproductive function. However, the results from epidemiological studies have been mixed. To assess this hypothesis, data on menstrual history, pregnancy history, and exogenous hormone use were analyzed from a population-based, case-control study conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area. Of 817 incident thyroid cancer patients (cases), ages 20-74 years, who were diagnosed in 1992-1998 and 793 controls, identified by random-digit dialing and frequency matched to cases on age and race/ethnicity, 608 (74%) cases and 558 (70%) controls were interviewed. Of these cases, 544 were of papillary histology and included in the present analysis. Women who reported onset of menarche before age 12 or after age 14 were at about 50% increased risk for papillary thyroid cancer; however, this effect differed among age- and ethnic-specific subgroups. Among parous women younger than age 45, risk was elevated for several variables measuring recency of pregnancy. Risk was reduced for women who had ever used oral contraceptives [odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.97], but there was no trend with duration of use. Although it remains unclear how sex hormones influence thyroid carcinogenesis, these relationships warrant further investigation.     

A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurses' Health Study, United States)

Results of previous epidemiologic studies have provided reassurance that there is little, if any, increase in risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive (OC) use in general. However, in several studies, an increased risk of breast cancer has been observed in two subgroups, young women who used OCs for extended durations and in women who used OCs prior to a first-term pregnancy. We evaluated these relationships using data from the ongoing Nurses' Health Study cohort (United States). We documented 3,383 cases of breast cancer from 1976 to 1992 among 1.6 million person-years of follow-up. We observed no overall relationship between duration of OC use and breast cancer risk, even among women who reported using OCs for 10 or more years (multivariate relative risk [RR]=1.11, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.94-1.32). Among women less than 45 years of age, the multivariate RR for using OCs for 10 or more years was 1.07 (CI=0.70-1.65) compared with never-users. The risk associated with five or more years of OC use prior to a first full-term pregnancy compared with never-use was 0.96 (CI=0.65-1.43). Among women less than 45 years of age, we observed no evidence of an increased risk with OC use before a first full-term pregnancy (use for five or more years: RR=0.57, CI=0.24-1.31). Because of the age distribution of our cohort, we were unable to evaluate these relationships among women less than 40 years of age. Our study provides considerable evidence that long-term past OC use, either overall or prior to a first full-term pregnancy, does not result in any appreciable increase in breast cancer risk in women over 40 years of age.     

Hormone replacement therapy and invasive and borderline epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) attendant to use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was evaluated in a population-based case-control study of newly diagnosed EOC cases (n=256) and randomly selected population controls (n=1122). Telephone interviews were conducted to obtain information on history of HRT and several other covariates. Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived from unconditional logistic regression. The OR for ever use of HRT was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.01-1.93) compared to never use. Long-term use (>10 years) increased risk (OR: 1.62, CI: 1.05-2.50) although the trend p-value for duration of use was of only borderline significance (p=0.08). The relationship was stronger in women without hysterectomy (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.14-2.41) or tubal ligation (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08-2.26). In this study, use of HRT is associated with an increased risk of EOC.     

Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin

BACKGROUND: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) given as unopposed estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) gained widespread popularity in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. Recent prescribing practices have favored combination HRT (CHRT), i.e., adding a progestin to estrogen for the entire monthly cycle (continuous combined replacement therapy [CCRT]) or a part of the cycle (sequential estrogen plus progestin therapy [SEPRT]). Few data exist on the association between CHRT and breast cancer risk. We determined the effects of CHRT on a woman's risk of developing breast cancer in a population-based, case-control study. METHODS: Case subjects included those with incident breast cancers diagnosed over 4(1/2) years in Los Angeles County, CA, in the late 1980s and 1990s. Control subjects were neighborhood residents who were individually matched to case subjects on age and race. Case subjects and control subjects were interviewed in person to collect information on known breast cancer risk factors as well as on HRT use. Information on 1897 postmenopausal case subjects and on 1637 postmenopausal control subjects aged 55-72 years who had not undergone a simple hysterectomy was analyzed. Breast cancer risks associated with the various types of HRT were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) after adjusting simultaneously for the different forms of HRT and for known risk factors of breast cancer. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: HRT was associated with a 10% higher breast cancer risk for each 5 years of use (OR(5) = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.18). Risk was substantially higher for CHRT use (OR(5) = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.07-1.45) than for ERT use (OR(5) = 1. 06; 95% CI = 0.97-1.15). Risk estimates were higher for SEPRT (OR(5) = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.13-1.68) than for CCRT (OR(5) = 1.09; 95% CI = 0. 88-1.35), but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides strong evidence that the addition of a progestin to HRT enhances markedly the risk of breast cancer relative to estrogen use alone. These findings have important implications for the risk-benefit equation for HRT in women using CHRT.     

Hormone replacement treatment and breast cancer risk: a cooperative Italian study.

The relationship between hormone replacement treatment (HRT) and breast cancer risk was analysed using data from a case-control study conducted between June 1991 and February 1994 in six Italian centres on 2569 patients aged below 75 with histologically confirmed breast cancer and 2588 controls admitted to hospital for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic, non hormone-related diseases. Ever HRT use was reported by 7.5% of cases and 7.5% of controls, corresponding to a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-1.5]. The risk increased with increasing duration of use: the ORs were 1.0 for use lasting less than 1 year, 1.3 for 1-4 years and 1.5 for 5 years or more. There was no clear pattern of risk with reference to time since starting use, but the OR was significantly elevated (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-2.9) for women who had stopped HRT within the last 10 years. No association was observed in those who had stopped HRT more than 10 years ago (OR = 1.0). The increased OR for women who had stopped HRT within the last 10 years was consistent across strata of identified covariates, and was significantly related to duration of use. This study confirms the absence of a strong association between HRT and breast cancer risk, although the risk estimate was above unity for women who had used HRT for 5 years or longer. However, the risk was significantly elevated in the short to medium term after use, particularly for long-term use. This short-term increased risk is consistent with an effect of HRT on one of the later stages of the process of breast carcinogenesis. The flattening of risk with increasing time since stopping, and hence the absence of a long-term cumulative excess in breast cancer risk after stopping HRT exposure, has relevant implications on individual risk assessment and public health.