Allelic imbalance at 11p15.5-15.4 correlated with c-Ha-ras mutation during radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women throughout much of the developed world and is associated with a multistage process involving a number of genetic mutations and their corresponding cellular phenotypic alterations. It has already been shown that neoplastic transformation of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial (MCF-10F) cell line by radiation, in combination with estrogen, represents a successful model in studying the molecular and biological alterations that may contribute to the tumorigenic process. In the present study, the incidence of allelic alterations (microsatellite instability/loss of heterozygosity) on chromosome 11 in different radiation-induced primary and secondary tumorigenic cell lines, relative to the control MCF-10F cells was investigated. We identified 3 regions of the chromosome 11 (11p15-p15.5, 11q13 and 11q23) that showed high incidence of LOH among these tumor cell lines and suggested a potential role for these chromosomal regions in breast carcinogenesis. Among them, locus 11p15.5, where c-Ha-ras oncogene is located, had incidence of allelic imbalance between 25-40%. Furthermore, direct sequencing analysis of codons 12 and 61 of the c-Ha-ras oncogene identified various point mutations. These data highlight the importance of chromosome 11 in radiation induced malignant transformation of human breast epithelial cells and suggest the usefulness of the model in uncovering specific derangements during breast cancer progression.     

Polymorphisms in ERCC2, MSH2, and OGG1 DNA repair genes and gallbladder cancer risk in a population of Northern India

BACKGROUND:

Genetic variants of DNA repair enzymes may lead to genetic instability and contribute to gallbladder (GB) carcinogenesis.

METHODS:

A case‐control study (230 GB carcinogenesis patients and 230 controls) was undertaken to evaluate whether genetic variations in 3 DNA repair genes ERCC2 (Asp312Asn [rs1799793] and Lys751Gln [rs13181]), MSH2 (?118T>C [rs2303425] and IVS1 + 9G>C [rs2303426]), and OGG1 (Ser326Cys [rs1052133] and 748‐15C>G [rs2072668]) are associated with GB carcinogenesis risk in a North Indian population.

RESULTS:

The authors found that the ERCC2 Asp312Asn AA, MSH2 IVS1 + 9G>C CC, OGG1 Ser326Cys GG and CG + GG, and OGG1 748‐15C>G GG and CG + GG genotypes were significantly associated with an increased risk of GB carcinogenesis (odds ratio [OR], 2.1, 1.8, 2.5, 1.8, 2.0, and 1.6, respectively). In contrast, ERCC2 Lys751Gln, and MSH2 ?118T>C markers showed no significant associations with GB carcinogenesis risk, although because of the small sample size their effects cannot be ruled out. Female GB carcinogenesis patients with the OGG1 748‐15C>G GG, OGG1 Ser326Cys GG, and ERCC2 Asp312Asn genotypes had a greater risk for developing the disease (OR, 3.6, 7.7, and 2.7, respectively). There was a significant interaction between MSH2 IVS1 + 9G>C and OGG1 748‐15C>G polymorphisms (P = .001). Furthermore, individuals with >6 variant alleles of the studied polymorphisms were at 4‐fold increased risk for developing GB carcinogenesis. Classification and Regression Tree analysis revealed potential higher‐order gene‐gene interactions and categorized a few higher‐risk subgroups for GB carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results suggest that genetic variants in the DNA repair pathways may be involved in GB carcinogenesis etiology. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

No association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: Iowa Women's Health Study

BACKGROUND: Genetic variation in DNA repair may contribute to differences in the susceptibility of several cancers. We evaluated two polymorphisms in the base excision repair pathway (BER) (XRCC1; Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) and one polymorphism in the double strand DNA repair pathway (XRCC3; Thr241Met) for their association with breast cancer risk. METHODS: The association was analyzed in a nested case control study of 460 breast cancer cases and 324 cancer-free controls within the Iowa Women's Health Cohort. DNA was obtained from blood samples or paraffin embedded tissues (PET) and all samples were genotyped by one of three genotyping platforms-PCR-RFLP, PCR-INVADER, or Sequenom. RESULTS: None of the three polymorphisms studied were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (XRCC1: Arg194Trp (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.78-1.88); Arg399Gln (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.80-1.79); XRCC3: Thr241Met (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.76-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that independently these polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes do not contribute significantly to the genetic susceptibility of breast cancer.