Kaolin-based activated coagulation time measured by sonoclot in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES: In vivo data for the kaolin-based ACT test from the Sonoclot Analyzer (SkACT, Sienco Inc, Arvada, CO) are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare SkACT with an established kaolin-based ACT from Hemochron (HkACT) and anti-Xa activity in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Community hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Blood samples were taken before CPB at baseline (T0) and after heparinization (T1 and T2), on CPB after administration of aprotinin (5, 15, 30, 60 minutes; T3-T6), and at the end after protamine infusion (T7). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 375 blood samples were analyzed. ACT measurements were comparable for SkACT and HkACT at each measurement time point. Overall bias +/- standard deviation between SkACT and HkACT was -19 +/- 75 seconds (-2.4% +/- 11.7%). Mean bias between SkACT and HkACT at each time point ranged from -35 to 3 seconds (-4.5% to 2.6%) and showed no statistical significance over time. Heparin sensitivity of SkACT and HkACT, defined as (ACT(Tx)-ACT(T0))/(anti-Xa(Tx)-anti-Xa(T0)), significantly increased for measurements during CPB (p < 0.001) but without significant difference between the 2 methods. Test variability was comparable for both ACT measurement techniques. Overall test variability was 7.5% +/- 7.4% for SkACT and 7.8% +/- 11% for HkACT. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and performance of SkACT and HkACT were comparable for heparin monitoring in patients undergoing CPB for elective cardiac surgery. However, both tests were affected significantly after initiating CPB and aprotinin infusion.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot.

OBJECTIVE: Kaolin-based activated clotting time assessed by HEMOCHRON (HkACT) is a clinical standard for heparin monitoring alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, aprotinin is known to prolong not only celite-based but also kaolin-based activated clotting time. Overestimation of activated clotting times implies a potential hazardous risk of subtherapeutic heparin anticoagulation. Recently, a novel 'aprotinin-insensitive' activated clotting time test has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer (SaiACT). The aim of our study was to evaluate SaiACT in patients undergoing CPB in presence of heparin and aprotinin. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 44 elective cardiac surgery patients at the following measurement time points: baseline (T0); before CPB after heparinization (T1 and T2); on CPB, before administration of aprotinin (T3); 15, 30, and 60 min on CPB after administration of aprotinin (T4, T5, and T6); after protamine infusion (T7). On each measurement time point, activated clotting time was assessed with HkACT and SaiACT, both in duplicate. Furthermore, the rate of factor Xa inhibition and antithrombin concentration were measured. Statistical analysis was done using Bland and Altman analysis, Pearson's correlation, and ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn correction. RESULTS: Monitoring anticoagulation with SaiACT showed reliable readings. Compared to the established HkACT, SaiACT values were lower at all measurement time points. On CPB but before administration of aprotinin (T3), SaiACT values (mean+/-SD) were 44+/-118 s lower compared to HkACT. However, the difference between the two measurement techniques increased significantly on CPB after aprotinin administration (T4-T6; 89+/-152 s, P=0.032). Correlation of ACT measurements with anti-Xa activity was unchanged for SaiACT before and after aprotinin administration (r2=0.473 and 0.487, respectively; P=0.794), but was lower for HkACT after aprotinin administration (r2=0.481 and 0.361, respectively; P=0.041). On CPB after administration of aprotinin, 96% of all ACT values were classified as therapeutic by HkACT, but only 86% of all values were classified therapeutic if ACT was determined by SaiACT. Test variability was comparable for SaiACT and HkACT. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SaiACT may result in more consistent heparin management that is less affected by aprotinin and a corresponding increase in heparin administration for patients receiving aprotinin.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: an in vitro evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using SONOCLOT

The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U x mL(-1)), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU x mL(-1)), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% +/- 37% (2 U x mL(-1)) and 24% +/- 18% (3 U x mL(-1)), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect. IMPLICATIONS: Current standard techniques to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are affected by aprotinin, a drug widely used in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro a new, so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' test from SONOCLOT to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation more reliably in combination with aprotinin.     

Monitoring of heparin-induced anticoagulation with kaolin-activated clotting time in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin.

High-dose aprotinin appears to enhance the anticoagulant effects of heparin, as documented by increases in the activated clotting times (ACTs) during cardiopulmonary bypass; hence, some authorities have advocated reducing the dose of heparin in patients treated with aprotinin. An in vitro study by our group suggested that the increase of the ACT in the presence of aprotinin and heparin may be due to the use of celite as surface activator. We compared celite and kaolin as surface activators for the measurement of the ACT in cardiac surgical patients treated with aprotinin and in patients given no aprotinin. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study included 30 patients, of whom 14 received aprotinin and 16 received a placebo. Before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass, the ACT was measured with two Hemochron 400 systems with 12 mg of either celite (C-ACT) or kaolin (K-ACT) used as surface activator and with one Hepcon HMS system (HR-ACT), which uses kaolin as activator. The latter also was used for measurement of the blood heparin concentration. The ACTs of blood without heparin did not differ between aprotinin and control patients. During anticoagulation with heparin and cardiopulmonary bypass, the average C-ACTs were 784 +/- 301 s (aprotinin) and 496 +/- 120 s (control) (P < .001); the K-ACTs were 502 +/- 131 s (aprotinin) and 458 +/- 101 s (control) (P > .05); the HR-ACTs were 406 +/- 87 s (aprotinin) and 423 +/- 82 s (control) (P > .05), which was consistently less than C-ACT and K-ACT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

在体外及体外循环中抑肽酶对ACT的影响

选择健康献血员及心内直视手术病，观察抑肽酶对全血活化凝血时间的影响。结果：在体外肝素剂量与ＡＣＴ有显著线性相关。抑肽酶单狡应用并不使ＡＣＴ延，但与肝素合用可协同性延长ＡＣＴ值；在体外循环中抑肽酶延长ＡＣＴ的值更为显著，一般超过８００ｓ。结论：抑肽酶可与肝素协同性延长ＡＣＴ，体外循环中应用抑肽酶时应以ＡＣＴ大于８００ｓ作为肝素抗凝标准。     

In vitro effects of aprotinin on activated clotting time measured with different activators.

The effects in vitro of aprotinin on the activated clotting time measured with both celite- and kaolin-activated tubes were investigated in 21 consecutive patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. Four whole-blood samples (2 ml per sample) from each patient were tested simultaneously with Hemochron automated timing systems (International Technidyne Corp., Edison, N.J.) before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. One tenth milliliter of either aprotinin (at a final concentration of 80, 120, or 180 KIU/ml) or saline solution was mixed in vitro with blood samples before determination of the activated clotting time. Aprotinin had no inhibitory effect on the activated clotting times of unheparinized blood. After heparin administration, aprotinin in the above concentrations prolonged the activated clotting times measured with celite-activated tubes by 47% to 71%, as compared with the measurements of the activated clotting time without the addition of aprotinin. The activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes were not increased, however, by the in vitro addition of aprotinin. Our in vitro results indicate that aprotinin in concentrations from 80 to 180 KIU/ml does not significantly enhance the inhibitory effects of heparin on the intrinsic coagulation system as evaluated by measurement of the activated clotting times in kaolin-activated tubes. The anticoagulation effect of heparin in patients receiving aprotinin infusion should be monitored with kaolin-activated instead of celite-activated tubes because the celite makes the measured activated clotting time unreliable in patients receiving aprotinin therapy. These in vitro results require confirmation in vivo in patients receiving aprotinin therapy.     

Reliability of the Heparin Management Test for Monitoring High Levels of Unfractionated Heparin: In Vitro Findings in Volunteers versus In Vivo Findings during Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background: The authors assessed the heparin management test in vitro in volunteers and in vivo during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods: In vitro, the heparin management test was analyzed for heparin levels between 0 and 6 IU/ml using variations in hematocrit, platelets, procoagulants, and storage time. The in vivo studies consisted of two groups: In group I (cardiopulmonary bypass <= 90 min, n = 40), anticoagulation was performed according to the activated clotting time (with or without aprotinin); in group II (cardiopulmonary bypass >= 180 min, with aprotinin) included use (n = 10) and nonuse of coumadin (n = 10) and anticoagulation according to the automated heparin dose-response assay. Tests were performed in duplicate (whole blood, two heparin management test analyzers) and compared with anti-Xa activity (plasma).

Results: In vitro, the results of the heparin management test (n = 1,070) correlated well with heparin concentration (r2 = 0.98). Dilution and storage time did not affect the heparin management test; a hematocrit of 60% and reduced procoagulants (10%) prolonged clotting time. In vivo, the correlation (heparin management test vs. anti-Xa) was strong in group I (r2 = 0.97 [with aprotinin] and 0.96 [without aprotinin]; n = 960) and group II without coumadin (r2 = 0.89, n = 516). In group II with coumadin, the overall correlation was r2 = 0.87 and 0.79 (n = 484), although the range varied widely (0.57-0.94, between-analyzer differences 0-47%).     

The in vitro effects of antithrombin III on the activated coagulation time in patients on heparin therapy

Heparin requires antithrombin III (AT) to achieve anticoagulation, and patients on continuous small-dose heparin preoperatively experience decreased levels of AT-causing heparin resistance. When this occurs, 2-4 units of fresh frozen plasma ( approximately 1000 units of AT) are often administered to increase AT levels and restore heparin responsiveness. We evaluated purified human AT concentrate (Thrombate III; Bayer, Inc., Elkhart, IN) to restore in vitro anticoagulation responses in patients receiving heparin. Blood samples were obtained from cardiac surgery patients including 22 patients receiving heparin and 21 patients not receiving heparin preoperatively. Heparin was added to blood in final concentrations of 4.1, 5.4, and 6.8 U/mL (equivalent to 300, 400, and 500 U/kg), and kaolin-activated clotting times (ACTs) were determined with and without AT at a final concentration of 0.2 units/mL to mimic fresh frozen plasma administration. The mean duration of preoperative heparin therapy was 4.0 days (range 2-10 days). AT activity was 69% +/- 9% in patients receiving heparin and 92% +/- 8% in patients not receiving heparin (P < 0.01). Heparin >4.1 U/mL failed to further increase ACT values in all patients. Attempts to increase ACT in patients receiving heparin may require supplemental AT administration. Purified AT even in small doses significantly prolongs the ACT response to heparin. Implications: In vitro addition of antithrombin III (0.2 U/mL) to heparinized blood samples (4.1-6.8 units of heparin/mL) from patients on previous heparin therapy increases sensitivity to supplemental heparin as reflected by significantly prolonged activated clotting time.     

Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

Intraoperative administration of the proteinase inhibitor aprotinin causes reduction in blood loss and homologous blood requirement in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To ascertain the blood-saving effect of aprotinin and to obtain further information about the mode of action, 40 patients undergoing primary myocardial revascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aprotinin or placebo treatment. Aprotinin was given as a bolus of 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) before surgery followed by a continuous infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU/h during surgery. Additionally, 2 x 10(6) KIU were added to the pump prime. Strict criteria were used to obtain a homogeneous patient selection. Total blood loss was reduced from 1,431 +/- 760 ml in the control group to 738 +/- 411 ml in the aprotinin group (P less than 0.05) and the homologous blood requirement from 838 +/- 963 ml to 163 +/- 308 ml (P less than 0.05). In the control group, 2.3 +/- 2.2 U of homologous blood or blood products were given, and in the aprotinin group, 0.63 +/- 0.96 U were given (P less than 0.05). Twenty-five percent of patients in the control group and 63% in the aprotinin group did not receive banked blood or homologous blood products. The activated clotting time as an indicator of inhibition of the contact phase of coagulation was significantly increased before heparinization in the aprotinin group (141 +/- 13 s vs. 122 +/- 25 s) and remained significantly increased until heparin was neutralized after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The clinical onset of heparin is rapid

This study used the activated clotting time (ACT) to determine the clinical onset of four different doses of heparin after bolus injection into the central circulation. Ten consenting adults (Group A) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were given 350 U/kg of bovine lung heparin and had simultaneous duplicate arterial and venous ACT determinations at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 600 s after heparin injection. Twenty additional coronary artery bypass grafting patients were alternately assigned to one of two 10-patient groups (B and C), which were given 200 and 300 U/kg of bovine lung heparin, respectively. Group D consisted of 10 abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy patients who received 70 U/kg of bovine lung heparin. In Groups B, C, and D, duplicate ACT measurements were taken from an indwelling arterial catheter at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 300 s after completion of a bolus injection of heparin into the central circulation. After a 70 U/kg heparin dose, all patients had significant ACT prolongation within 30 s, and 8 of 10 had effectively achieved their peak anticoagulation response by that time. In all patients receiving 200, 300, and 350 U/kg of heparin, arterial anticoagulation (ACT > 300 s) occurred and in most patients peaked within 30 s after heparin administration (P < 0.05). Arterial and venous ACTs did not differ significantly from each other at any measurement period, but venous ACTs peaked slightly later than arterial ACTs (within 60 s in 9 of 10 patients). When 200 U/kg or more of heparin is administered into the central venous circulation in hemodynamically stable anesthetized patients, peak arterial ACT prolongation occurs within 30 s and peak venous ACT prolongation within 60 s.     

Reliability of the heparin management test for monitoring high levels of unfractionated heparin: in vitro findings in volunteers versus in vivo findings during cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: The authors assessed the heparin management test in vitro in volunteers and in vivo during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: In vitro, the heparin management test was analyzed for heparin levels between 0 and 6 IU/ml using variations in hematocrit, platelets, procoagulants, and storage time. The in vivostudies consisted of two groups: In group I (cardiopulmonary bypass /= 180 min, with aprotinin) included use (n = 10) and nonuse of coumadin (n = 10) and anticoagulation according to the automated heparin dose-response assay. Tests were performed in duplicate (whole blood, two heparin management test analyzers) and compared with anti-Xa activity (plasma). RESULTS: In vitro, the results of the heparin management test (n = 1,070) correlated well with heparin concentration (r2 = 0.98). Dilution and storage time did not affect the heparin management test; a hematocrit of 60% and reduced procoagulants (10%) prolonged clotting time. In vivo, the correlation (heparin management test vs. anti-Xa) was strong in group I (r2 = 0.97 [with aprotinin] and 0.96 [without aprotinin]; n = 960) and group II without coumadin (r2 = 0.89, n = 516). In group II with coumadin, the overall correlation was r2 = 0.87 and 0.79 (n = 484), although the range varied widely (0.57-0.94, between-analyzer differences 0-47%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the heparin management test were influenced by hematocrit, plasma coagulation factors, and the heparin level, but not by use of aprotinin. The heparin management test provided reliable values in vitro in group I, and in group II without coumadin but was less reliable in group II with coumadin.     

Evaluation of a new point-of-care celite-activated clotting time analyzer in different clinical settings. The i-STAT celite-activated clotting time test

BACKGROUND: Activated clotting time (ACT) is used to monitor heparin therapy during cardiopulmonary bypass, interventional cardiology, and hemodialysis. Traditionally, ACT is performed by use of the Hemochron system. Recently, a new device, the i-STAT system, has been introduced to measure ACT. The aim of this study was to correlate the performances of these two systems and to compare ACT values with heparin levels. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five samples from 29 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass or hemodialysis were assayed in duplicate with two Hemochron and two i-STAT devices. Heparin levels were determined by anti-factor Xa assay. RESULTS: The Hemochron ACT ranged from 88 to 1,028 s, and the i-STAT ACT ranged from 80 to 786 s. Heparin plasma levels ranged from 0.01 to 10.8 U/mL. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference between the two methods of 24 +/- 101 s. Strong relationships between anti-factor Xa activity and Hemochron ACTs (r2 = 0.69, P < 0.001) and i-STAT ACTs (r2 = 0.79, P < 0.001) were observed. During cardiac surgery, significant correlations were found: Hemochron, r2 = 0.61, P < 0.001 and i-STAT, r2 = 0.74, P < 0.001. During hemodialysis, relationships between anti-factor Xa activity and ACTs were found: Hemochron, r2 = 0.62, P < 0.001 and i-STAT, r2 = 0.55, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: During cardiopulmonary bypass procedure and hemodialysis, i-STAT provides measurements of clotting time quite similar to Hemochron ACT, which were significantly correlated with heparin levels.     

The effect of temperature and aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass on three different methods of activated clotting time measurement

The activated clotting time (ACT) is used frequently for monitoring blood anticoagulant response with heparin before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Many cardiac procedures involving CPB require reduction of the patient's blood temperature and use of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin. Three different methods of ACT measurement were compared to show the effects of different CPB temperatures and the presence of aprotinin. A total of 42 patients were included in the study: 14 received CPB at 28 degrees C, 14 received CPB at 32 degrees C, and 14 normothermic (37 degrees C) CPB. Within each temperature group, seven received aprotinin. The ACT in each group of patients was measured by a celite activator (C-ACT), a kaolin activator (K-ACT), and a celite, kaolin and glass activator (MAX-ACT). All three methods of ACT measurement showed significant increases (p < .05) in clotting times at hypothermic CPB compared with normothermic groups. During heparinization the C-ACT was significantly increased (p < .05) in the presence of aprotinin. Comparability between the 3 ACT measurement methods showed a very high correlation between C-ACT and K-ACT clotting times (R2 = .8962), and slightly lower correlation between MAX-ACT and C-ACT (R2 = .7780), and MAX-ACT and K-ACT (R2 = .7827). All ACT measurements are affected by changes in blood temperature. The C-ACT measurement is prolonged with aprotinin, whereas the MAX-ACT and K-ACT method of measurement in the presence of aprotinin are not significantly altered. It appears that the MAX-ACT produces lower values and may necessitate additional heparin therapy for ACT target values considered safe during CPB. Further study is required from these additional findings.     

Aprotinin and hemostasis monitoring concerns during cardiac surgery

Aprotinin (Trasylol) is a serine protease inhibitor, isolated from bovine lung that initially was marketed for the treatment of pancreatitis. In the mid 1980s, reports of its ability to decrease hemorrhaging after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery introduced the drug to the realm of cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, its introduction into this arena was followed by the publication of multiple studies and case reports that blamed aprotinin for poor outcomes in the form of early graft closure. More than 17 years have passed since the initial article describing the use of aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass, and with time there has been a significant increase in scientific knowledge and clinical experience. Interestingly, modern literature does not support the dogma that aprotinin is a procoagulant. Aprotinin increases the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), as well as the kaolin- and celite-activated clotting time (ACT), regardless of heparin. Aprotinin, because of its ability to inhibit kallikrein, has been found to decrease thrombin antithrombin III complexes, fibrin-split products, fibrinopeptide 1+2, prothrombin fragments, and all markers of thrombin formation. Some authors have suggested that it may have a synergistic effect with heparin to ensure graft patency. Anticoagulation monitoring during the use of aprotinin also has been developed based on early studies. Aprotinin administration does influence the results of various ACT tests, and consequently different methods of testing anticoagulation have been developed. Researchers have demonstrated that the celite ACT is not "artificially" prolonged in the presence of heparin and aprotinin, rather the kaolin ACT is "artificially" shortened. This article will review the scientific literature with regard to aprotinin's anticoagulatory effects and review the current recommendations for hemostasis monitoring during the use of aprotinin.     

In vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma on the activated coagulation time in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

The in vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on the whole blood activated coagulation time (ACT) was examined in 18 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The addition of FFP to whole blood in vitro, after systemic heparinization, significantly prolonged the ACT from 451 +/- 21 seconds (mean +/- SE) to 572 +/- 41 seconds (P less than 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the plasma antithrombin III activity and the prolongation in ACT after systemic heparinization, with or without addition of FFP. The addition of FFP to whole blood in three of the six patients who exhibited heparin resistance (ACT less than 400 seconds after administration of 350 unit/kg heparin) did not prolong the ACT to greater than 400 seconds. These observations suggest that infusion of FFP will further prolong the ACT after heparin administration in most patients including some with initial heparin resistance.     

New screening method for coagulation abnormality including AT III deficiency during CABG]

In our institute, 1 ml of heparin is administered to the patients undergoing CABG before dissection and mobilization of the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) and/or right gastroepiploic artery (GEA) to prevent possible thrombosis or coagulation tendency. Two patients with AT III deficiency underwent CABG and one of them died. The aim of this study is to know whether ACT check before and after administration of 1 ml of heparin is useful as a screening test of coagulation abnormalities including AT III deficiency. One hundred patients (84 males and 16 females) undergoing CABG were studied. Age ranged from 41 to 79 years (mean 64.8 +/- 8.0 years). One ml of heparin was administered to all the patients before ITAs and/or GEA were dissected and mobilized. ACT was doubly checked before (control ACT: c-ACT) and after (heparinized ACT: h-ACT) administration of heparin. ACT extension was defined as follows: ACT extension = (c-ACT)-(h-ACT). Mean c-ACT was 124 +/- 12 sec., h-ACT 188 +/- 26 sec. and ACT extension 64 +/- 24 sec. There were only 3 cases which ACT extension were less than 30 sec.: two of them were combined with AT III deficiency and the other was due to insufficient administration of heparin. In conclusion, examination of ACT after 1 ml administration of heparin is new, simple and convenient screening method for coagulation abnormalities including AT III deficiency during CABG.     

Safety and efficacy of a heparin removal device: a prospective randomized preclinical outcomes study

BACKGROUND: Systemic protamine sulfate for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with uncommon, but life-threatening adverse reactions. METHODS: In a prospective randomized 3-day outcomes study, a heparin removal device (HRD) group (n = 12; 60-, 80-, 100-kg subgroups) was compared with a matched systemic Protamine group (Protamine; n = 6) for safety and efficacy using an adult swine model of CPB (60 minutes, 28 degrees C). RESULTS: HRD run time was 25 to 38 minutes depending on weight without complications. After HRD, heparin concentration decreased from 4.77 +/- 0.17 to 0.45 +/- 0.06 U/mL (activated clotting time [ACT] 776 +/- 83 to 180 +/- 12 seconds), and in Protamine, 3.94 +/- 0.63 to 0.13 +/- 0.02 U/mL (ACT 694 +/- 132 to 101 +/- 5 seconds) (p = 0.01 between groups, but no significant differences 60 minutes later). No significant difference between HRD and Protamine to 72 hours was seen in plasma-free hemoglobin C3a, heparin concentration, thromboelastogram index, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-thrombin III, fibrinogen, ACT, and tissue histology. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective randomized outcomes study, HRD achieved predictable reversal of systemic heparinization after CPB with no difference in safety or outcomes compared with protamine.     

A novel thrombelastograph tissue factor/kaolin assay of activated clotting times for monitoring heparin anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass

We used a thrombelastograph (TEG) assay with tissue factor and kaolin (TEG TF/K) to measure activated clotting time (ACT) in 31 patients during cardiopulmonary bypass. For comparison, ACTs were also determined by a Hemochron Jr. Signature and a Hepcon HMS. The TEG TF/K correlated with both the Hepcon (r(2) = 0.789) and Hemochron (r(2) = 0.743) ACTs. The average ACT after heparin was 319 +/- 119 s (mean +/- sd) for the TEG TF/K compared with 624 +/- 118 s for the Hepcon instrument. To evaluate the effects of hemodilution on TEG TF/K and Hemochron assays, ACT assays were performed on blood diluted to 50% and titrated with heparin from 0 to 6 U/mL. Both instruments showed significant (P < 0.01) changes in the ACT-versus-heparin slope, but the 0 heparin intercept for the TEG TF/K ACTs was not significantly changed (P = 0.292), in contrast to that for the Hemochron device (P = 0.041). Both instruments also indicated the same 1.3:1 ratio of protamine to heparin for optimum heparin neutralization, with increasing ACTs at ratios >2.6:1. The TEG TF/K ACT assay rapidly monitors heparin anticoagulation, in addition to the capabilities of this instrument to monitor platelet function, clotting factors, and fibrinolysis.     

Aprotinin does not prolong the Sonoclot aprotinin-insensitive activated clotting time

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a new Sonoclot-based, aprotinin-insensitive activated clotting time (aiACT) assay yields stable results over a broad range of aprotinin concentrations. DESIGN: Prospective trial conducted on in vitro blood samples. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 19 healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood samples were collected from volunteers. Heparin (2 U/mL) and escalating concentrations of aprotinin of 160 to 500 kallikrein inhibitory units (KIU)/mL were added in vitro. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Celite ACT, kaolin ACT, and aiACT assays were completed. The aiACT showed stable activated clotting time (ACT) results on heparinized, noncitrated blood with added aprotinin (P = nonsignificant). In contrast, celite ACT and kaolin ACT were greatly prolonged when aprotinin was added to heparinized, noncitrated, and citrated blood (P < 0.05). The aiACT had consistent results at all aprotinin concentrations (P = nonsignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin (160, 320, and 500 KIU/mL) significantly prolongs the ACT value with celite and kaolin activators but not with the aprotinin-insensitive activator.     

A randomized trial of antithrombin concentrate for treatment of heparin resistance

BACKGROUND: Heparin resistance is an important clinical problem traditionally treated with additional heparin or fresh frozen plasma. We undertook a randomized clinical trial to determine if treatment with antithrombin (AT) concentrate is effective for treating this condition. METHODS: Patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass who were considered to be heparin resistant (activated clotting time < 480 seconds after > 450 IU/kg heparin) were randomized to receive either 1000 U AT or additional heparin. RESULTS: AT concentrate was effective in 42 of 44 patients (96%) for immediately obtaining a therapeutic activated clotting time. This compared favorably to 28 of 41 patients (68%) treated with additional heparin (p = 0.001). All patients who failed heparin therapy were successfully treated with AT. The patients receiving AT required less time to obtain an adequate ACT but there was no difference in clinical outcomes among the groups. Study patients had deficient AT activity at baseline (56%+/-25%), which improved in those given AT concentrate (75%+/-31% versus 50%+/-23%, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: Heparin resistance is frequently associated with AT deficiency. Treating this deficiency with AT concentrate is more effective and faster for obtaining adequate anticoagulation than using additional heparin.