Presynaptically located CB1 cannabinoid receptors regulate GABA release from axon terminals of specific hippocampal interneurons

To understand the functional significance and mechanisms of action in the CNS of endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids, it is crucial to identify the neural elements that serve as the structural substrate of these actions. We used a recently developed antibody against the CB1 cannabinoid receptor to study this question in hippocampal networks. Interneurons with features typical of basket cells showed a selective, intense staining for CB1 in all hippocampal subfields and layers. Most of them (85.6%) contained cholecystokinin (CCK), which corresponded to 96.9% of all CCK-positive interneurons, whereas only 4.6% of the parvalbumin (PV)-containing basket cells expressed CB1. Accordingly, electron microscopy revealed that CB1-immunoreactive axon terminals of CCK-containing basket cells surrounded the somata and proximal dendrites of pyramidal neurons, whereas PV-positive basket cell terminals in similar locations were negative for CB1. The synthetic cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 (0.01-3 microM) reduced dose-dependently the electrical field stimulation-induced [3H]GABA release from superfused hippocampal slices, with an EC50 value of 0. 041 microM. Inhibition of GABA release by WIN 55,212-2 was not mediated by inhibition of glutamatergic transmission because the WIN 55,212-2 effect was not reduced by the glutamate blockers AP5 and CNQX. In contrast, the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716A (1 microM) prevented this effect, whereas by itself it did not change the outflow of [3H]GABA. These results suggest that cannabinoid-mediated modulation of hippocampal interneuron networks operate largely via presynaptic receptors on CCK-immunoreactive basket cell terminals. Reduction of GABA release from these terminals is the likely mechanism by which both endogenous and exogenous CB1 ligands interfere with hippocampal network oscillations and associated cognitive functions.     

Species and strain differences in the expression of a novel glutamate-modulating cannabinoid receptor in the rodent hippocampus

A novel, non-CB1 cannabinoid receptor has been defined by the persistence of inhibition of glutamatergic EPSPs by the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 in mice lacking the cloned CB1 receptor (CB1-/-) (Hajos et al., 2001). This novel receptor was also distinguished from CB1 by its sensitivity to the antagonist SR141716A and its insensitivity to the antagonist AM251 (Hajos & Freund, 2002). We have chosen to refer to this putative receptor as CBsc due to its identification on Schaffer collateral axon terminals in the hippocampus. We examined properties of CBsc receptors in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats and two strains of wild-type (WT) mice (C57BL/6J and CD1) used as backgrounds for two independent lines of CB1-/- mice (Ledent et al., 1999; Zimmer et al., 1999). The inhibition of synaptic glutamate release by WIN55,212-2 was observed in hippocampal slices from WT CD1 mice and SD rats but was absent in WT C57 mice. We also found that AM251 and SR141716A antagonized the effect of WIN55,212-2 in hippocampal slices from CD1 mice and SD rats demonstrating a lack of selectivity of these ligands for CB1 and CBsc receptors in these animals. The results indicate that the glutamate-modulating CBsc cannabinoid receptor is present in the hippocampi of CD1 mice and SD rats but not in C57BL/6J mice. Thus, we have identified animal models that may permit the study of cannabinoids independently of the novel CBsc receptor (C57CB1+/+), the CBsc receptor independently of the cloned CB1 receptor (CD1CB1-/-), or in the absence of both receptors (C57CB1-/-).     

Cannabinoids ablate release of TNFalpha in rat microglial cells stimulated with lypopolysaccharide

Upon activation, brain microglial cells release proinflammatory mediators, such as TNFalpha, which may play an important role in eliciting neuroinflammatory processes causing brain damage. As cannabinoids have been reported to exert anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective actions in the brain, we here examined the effect of both synthetic and endogenous cannabinoids on TNFalpha release elicited by bacterial endotoxin lypopolysaccharide (LPS) in cultured microglia. Exposure of primary cultures of rat cortical microglial cells to LPS significantly stimulated TNFalpha mRNA expression and release. The endogenous cannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG), as well as the synthetic cannabinoids (+)WIN 55,212-2, CP 55,940, and HU210, inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner (1-10 microM) the LPS-induced TNFalpha release. Unlike the high-affinity cannabinoid receptor agonist (+)WIN 55,212-2, the low-affinity stereoisomer (-)WIN 55,212-2 did not exert any significant inhibition on TNFalpha release. Given this stereoselectivity, the ability of (+)WIN 55,212-2 to inhibit LPS-induced TNFalpha release from microglia is most likely receptor-mediated. By RT-PCR we found that the two G(i/o) protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors (type 1 and 2) are both expressed in microglial cultures. However, selective antagonists of type 1 (SR141716A and AM251) and type 2 (SR144528) cannabinoid receptors did not affect the effect of (+)WIN 55,212-2. Consistent with this finding is the observation that the ablative effect of (+)WIN 55,212-2 on LPS-evoked release of TNFalpha was not sensitive to the G(i/o) protein inactivator pertussis toxin. In addition, the cAMP elevating agents dibutyryl cAMP and forskolin both abolished LPS-induced TNFalpha release, thus rendering unlikely the possibility that (+)WIN 55,212-2 could ablate TNFalpha release through the inhibition of adenylate cyclase via the G(i)-coupled cannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2. In summary, our data indicate that both synthetic and endogenous cannabinoids inhibit LPS-induced release of TNFalpha from microglial cells. By showing that such effect does not appear to be mediated by either CB receptor type 1 or 2, we provide evidence suggestive of the existence of yet unidentified cannabinoid receptor(s) in brain microglia.     

Anandamide and WIN 55212-2 inhibit cyclic AMP formation through G-protein-coupled receptors distinct from CB1 cannabinoid receptors in cultured astrocytes

The effects of anandamide and the cannabinoid receptor agonists WIN 55212-2 and CP 55940 on the evoked formation of cyclic AMP were compared in cultured neurons and astrocytes from the cerebral cortex and striatum of mouse embryos. The three compounds inhibited the isoproterenol-induced accumulation of cyclic AMP in neuronal cells, and these responses were blocked by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A. The three agonists were more potent in cortical than striatal neurons. Interestingly, WIN 55212-2, CP 55940 and anandamide also inhibited the isoproterenol-evoked accumulation of cyclic AMP in astrocytes but, in contrast to WIN 55212-2 and CP 55940, anandamide was much more potent in striatal than cortical astrocytes. Inhibition was prevented by pertussis toxin pretreatment, but not blocked by SR 141716A. Therefore, G-protein-coupled receptors, distinct from CB1 receptors, are involved in these astrocytic responses. Moreover, specific binding sites for [3H]-SR 141716A were found in neurons but not astrocytes. Furthermore, using a polyclonal CB1 receptor antibody, staining was observed in striatal and cortical neurons, but not in striatal and cortical astrocytes. Taken together, these results suggest that glial cells possess G-protein-coupled receptors activated by cannabinoids distinct from the neuronal CB1 receptor, and that glial cells responses must be taken into account when assessing central effects of cannabinoids.     

Systemic,but not local,administration of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists modulate prefrontal cortical acetylcholine efflux in the rat

Drugs acting on brain cannabinoid CB(1) receptors exert complex actions on modulatory transmitters that are involved in attention and cognition; however, little is known about the precise pharmacological and anatomical mechanisms that govern these effects. Previously demonstrated effects of cannabinoids on acetylcholine (ACh) in the hippocampus prompted us to evaluate changes in the prefrontal cortex, a site associated with mnemonic and attentional functions. We utilized in vivo microdialysis, coupled with direct reverse perfusion of agents, to study the actions on cannabinoidergic drugs on ACh release within the rat frontal cortex. Systemic administration of the CB(1) receptor agonists Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or WIN 55,212-2 (WIN) dose- and time-dependently increased ACh release; these effects were blocked by pretreatment with the selective CB(1) receptor antagonist / partial inverse agonist SR141716A (SR). THC applied by reverse dialysis in the frontal cortex caused no change in ACh release, although intrastriatal infusions of THC decreased ACh efflux. These data indicate that cannabinoid agonists potentiate ACh release in the frontal cortex by activating cannabinoid receptors in brain regions other than the frontal cortex.     

CB1 receptor mediated analgesia from the Nucleus Reticularis Gigantocellularis pars alpha is activated in an animal model of neuropathic pain.

Cannabinoids are known to suppress responses to noxious stimulation in animals and man. Recent research has suggested a role for endogenous cannabinoids in the descending inhibition of dorsal horn cells via a supraspinal site of action. We have recently demonstrated [J. Physiol. 506(2) (1998) 459] that the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis pars alpha (GiA) is a major source of such descending modulation, and importantly, that this system is activated in response to noxious stimulation. We have therefore investigated the role of CB1 receptor activation in mediating the antinociceptive effects of activation of GiA in models of acute and chronic pain. Microinjections (0.5 microl 60% DMSO) of either WIN 55,212-2 (5 microg, selective CB1 agonist), SR141716A (50 microg, competitive CB1 antagonist), both compounds together, or vehicle alone into GiA were performed prior to these tests in a randomised, blind manner. In control animals, WIN 55,212-2 markedly increased withdrawal latencies in the tail flick test and reduced responses to subcutaneous formalin. These effects were blocked by co-administration of SR141716A. These data suggest that activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor subtypes in GiA leads to behavioural analgesia. In animals with partial sciatic nerve ligation, microinjection of drugs and injection of formalin were performed contralaterally to the site of ligation. Partial sciatic nerve ligation significantly reduced behavioural responses to contralaterally applied formalin. Microinjection of SR141716A to GiA reversed this inhibition of responses to formalin in animals with partial sciatic nerve ligation. These data provide evidence that endogenous CB1 receptor ligands are involved in GiA mediated antinociception, and that this system is important for the modulation of nociceptive transmission in an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain.     

Changes in cannabinoid receptor subtype 1 activity and interaction with metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptors in the periaqueductal gray-rostral ventromedial medulla pathway in a rodent neuropathic pain model

This study analyzed the effect of intra-ventrolateral periaqueductal grey (VL PAG) cannabinoid receptor (CB) stimulation on pain responses and rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) neural activity in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain in rats. Interaction between CB1 and metabotropic glutamate 1 and 5 (mGlu(1)/mGlu(5)) receptors was also investigated together with the expression of the CB1 receptor associated Gαi3 and cannabinoid receptor interacting 1a (CRIP 1a) proteins and the endocannabinoid synthesising and hydrolysing enzymes. In rats not subjected to CCI-induced pain, intra-VL PAG (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl) pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2) (2-4-8 nmol), a CB receptor agonist, increased the tail flick latency and changed the ongoing activity of RVM OFF and the tail flick-related activity of the ON and OFF cells, accordingly. These effects were prevented by SR141716A and MPEP, selective CB(1) and mGlu(5) receptor antagonists, respectively, though not by CPCCOEt, a selective mGlu(1) receptor antagonist. A higher dose up to 16 nmol of WIN 55,212-2 was necessary to increase tail flick latency and change ON and OFF cell activity in CCI rats. Consistently, CCI rats showed a decrease in the expression of CB(1) receptors, NAPE-PLD, Gαi3 and CRIP 1a proteins;the expression of diacylglycerol lipase A (DAGLA) was increased while fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL) did not change. As in control rats, MPEP and SR141716A also blocked WIN 55,212-2- induced effects in CCI rats. These data demonstrate a down regulation of the endocannabinoid system and a functional interaction between mGlu(5) and CB(1) receptors for cannabinoid-mediated effect in the PAG-RVM pain circuitry in neuropathic pain inflicted rats.     

CB1 receptor mediated analgesia from the Nucleus Reticularis Gigantocellularis pars alpha is activated in an animal model of neuropathic pain

Cannabinoids are known to suppress responses to noxious stimulation in animals and man. Recent research has suggested a role for endogenous cannabinoids in the descending inhibition of dorsal horn cells via a supraspinal site of action. We have recently demonstrated [J. Physiol. 506(2) (1998) 459] that the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis pars alpha (GiA) is a major source of such descending modulation, and importantly, that this system is activated in response to noxious stimulation. We have therefore investigated the role of CB1 receptor activation in mediating the antinociceptive effects of activation of GiA in models of acute and chronic pain. Microinjections (0.5 μl 60% DMSO) of either WIN 55,212-2 (5 μg, selective CB1 agonist), SR141716A (50 μg, competitive CB1 antagonist), both compounds together, or vehicle alone into GiA were performed prior to these tests in a randomised, blind manner. In control animals, WIN 55,212-2 markedly increased withdrawal latencies in the tail flick test and reduced responses to subcutaneous formalin. These effects were blocked by co-administration of SR141716A. These data suggest that activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor subtypes in GiA leads to behavioural analgesia. In animals with partial sciatic nerve ligation, microinjection of drugs and injection of formalin were performed contralaterally to the site of ligation. Partial sciatic nerve ligation significantly reduced behavioural responses to contralaterally applied formalin. Microinjection of SR141716A to GiA reversed this inhibition of responses to formalin in animals with partial sciatic nerve ligation. These data provide evidence that endogenous CB1 receptor ligands are involved in GiA mediated antinociception, and that this system is important for the modulation of nociceptive transmission in an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain.     

CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 decreases intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats

The effect of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on intravenous cocaine self-administration (IVSA) in rats was evaluated. Male Long Evans rats were implanted with silastic catheters through the external jugular vein. The IVSA was conducted in 3-h daily sessions with a fixed ratio (FR1) schedule: the experimental apparatus had a nose-poking response-like operandum. Intravenous pre-treatment with WIN 55,212-2 (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) to rats self-administering cocaine (0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/inj) at stable baseline, reduces cocaine intake in a dose-dependent manner. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (3 mg/kg i.p.) completely reversed the WIN 55,212-2-induced decrease of cocaine intake. However, pre-treatment of SR 141716A alone (up to dose of 9 mg/kg i.p.) was unable to modify cocaine IVSA. These results indicate that stimulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors activates rewarding mechanisms which produce reinforcing effects additional to those induced by cocaine.     

Functional localization of cannabinoid receptors and endogenous cannabinoid production in distinct neuron populations of the hippocampus

The possible localization of cannabinoid (CB) receptors to glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic terminals impinging upon GABAergic interneurons in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus was examined using the electrophysiological measurement of neurotransmitter release in brain slices. Whereas activation of cannabinoid receptors via the application of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 significantly and dose-dependently reduced evoked IPSCs recorded from interneurons possessing somata located in the stratum radiatum (S.R.) and stratum oriens (S.O.) lamellae, evoked glutamatergic EPSCs were unaffected in both neuronal populations. However, in agreement with previous reports, WIN55,212-2 significantly reduced EPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons. Additional experiments confirmed that the effects of WIN55,212-2 on IPSCs were presynaptic and that they could be blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A. The involvement of endogenous cannabinoids in the presynaptic inhibition of GABA release was also examined in the interneurons and pyramidal cells using a depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) paradigm. DSI was observed in CA1 pyramidal neurons under control conditions, and its incidence was greatly increased by the cholinergic agonist carbachol. However, DSI was not observed in the S.R. or S.O. interneuron populations, in either the presence or absence of carbachol. Whereas DSI was not present in these interneurons, the inhibitory inputs to these cells were modulated by the synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2. These data support the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptors are located on inhibitory, but not excitatory, axon terminals impinging upon hippocampal interneurons, and that CA1 pyramidal neurons, and not interneurons, are capable of generating endogenous cannabinoids during prolonged states of depolarization.     

Differential stimulatory effects of cannabinoids on VIP release and NO synthase activity in synaptosomal fractions from rat ileum

Cannabinoid-1 (CB1) and CB2 receptors are present on neurons of the enteric nervous system. Our aim was to study whether cannabinoid receptor activation is involved in the regulation of VIP release and NO synthesis in isolated fractions of nerve terminals from rat ileum. VIP was measured by RIA and NO synthesis was analyzed using a L-[3H]arginine assay. Anandamide stimulated VIP release (basal: 245.9+/-12.4pg/mg, 10(-6)M: 307.6+/-11.7pg/mg, [n=6, P<0.05], 10(-7)M: 367.0+/-26.1pg/mg, [n=6, P<0.01]). The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 had similar effects (basal: 250.5+/-37.4pg/mg, 10(-6)M: 320.9+/-34.7pg/mg; [n=4, P<0.05]). The stimulatory effect of anandamide was blocked by the selective CB2 receptor antagonist, SR144528 (10(-7)M) (anandamide 10(-6)M: 307.6+/-11.7pg/mg; +SR144528: 249.0+/-26.3pg/mg, [n=6, P<0.05]), whereas the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 A had no effect. NO synthesis was stimulated by anandamide ([fmol/mg/min] basal: 0.08+/-0.01, 10(-6)M: 0.16+/-0.03; 10(-7)M: 0.13+/-0.02, n=4, P<0.05) and WIN 55,212-2 ([fmol/mg/min] basal: 0.05+/-0.01, 10(-6)M: 0.1+/-0.02, n=4, P<0.05). The anandamide reuptake inhibitor, AM 404 increased basal NOS activity ([fmol/mg/min] control: 0.1+/-0.04, 10(-6)M: 0.28+/-0.08, n=7, P<0.05). The stimulatory effect of anandamide on NO synthase was not antagonized by antagonists at the CB1, CB2 or TRPV1 receptor, respectively. In conclusion, in enteric nerves anandamide stimulates VIP release by activation of a CB2 receptor specific pathway, while the stimulation of NO production suggests the existence of an additional type of cannabinoid receptor in the enteric nervous system.     

Direct and indirect interactions between cannabinoid CB1 receptor and group II metabotropic glutamate receptor signalling in layer V pyramidal neurons from the rat prefrontal cortex

At proximal synapses from layer V pyramidal neurons from the rat prefrontal cortex, activation of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (group II mGlu) by (2S,2'R,3'R)-2-(2',3'-dicarboxycyclopropyl) glycine (DCG IV) induced a long-lasting depression of excitatory postsynaptic currents. Paired-pulse experiments suggested that the depression was expressed presynaptically. Activation of type 1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1) by WIN 55,212-2 occluded the DCG IV-induced depression in a mutually occlusive manner. At the postsynaptic level, WIN 55,212-2 and DCG IV were also occlusive for the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. The postsynaptic localization of active extracellular signal-regulated kinase was confirmed by immunocytochemistry after activation of CB1 receptors. However, phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in layer V pyramidal neurons was dependent on the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors, consequently to a release of glutamate in the local network. Group II mGlu were also shown to be involved in long-term changes in synaptic plasticity induced by high frequency stimulations. The group II mGlu antagonist (RS)-alpha-methylserine-O-phosphate monophenyl ester (MSOPPE) favoured long-term depression. However, no interaction was found between MSOPPE, WIN 55,212-2 and the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A on the modulation of long-term depression or long-term potentiation and the effects of these drugs were rather additive. We suggest that CB1 receptor and group II mGlu signalling may interact through a presynaptic mechanism in the induction of a DCG IV-induced depression. Postsynaptically, an indirect interaction occurs for activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. However, none of these interactions seem to play a role in synaptic plasticities induced with high frequency stimulations.     

WIN 55,212-2 decreases the reinforcing actions of cocaine through CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation

CB(1) cannabinoid receptor agonists show a different profile compared to other drugs of abuse on the basis of experimental data that reveal their reinforcing properties. Thus, there are controversial data in the literature concerning the ability of CB(1) receptor agonists to reinforce behavioral responses in experimental animals, i.e. to lower self-stimulation thresholds, and to support self-administration or conditioned place preference. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of WIN 55,212-2, a potent CB(1) receptor agonist (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg, i.p.), on the rewarding efficacy of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and on the systemic cocaine-induced potentiation of brain-stimulation reward. WIN 55,212-2 did not affect lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation thresholds both in drug nai;ve rats and in rats pretreated with the drug, whereas it produced a significant, dose-dependent decrease in the maximal rate of responding, i.e. in the performance of the animals. Cocaine (5.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a significant reduction in self-stimulation threshold, without altering maximal rates of responding. Importantly, WIN 55,212-2 attenuated the effect of cocaine at the two higher doses tested. The effects of the CB(1) receptor agonist were reversed by pretreatment with the selective CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.02 mg/kg, i.p.) that did not by itself affect cocaine's action. These results indicate that acute stimulation of CB(1) receptors per se does not affect baseline self-stimulation, but reduces the reinforcing effects induced by cocaine. Taken together these findings suggest that cannabinoids may interfere with brain-reward systems responsible for the expression of acute reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, and provide evidence that the cannabinoid system could be an interesting drug discovery and development target for the treatment of drug addiction.     

Cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 inhibits rat cortical dialysate gamma-aminobutyric acid levels

The effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (0.1-5 mg/kg i.p.) on endogenous extracellular gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in the cerebral cortex of the awake rat was investigated by using microdialysis. WIN 55,212-2 (1 and 5 mg/kg i.p.) was associated with a concentration-dependent decrease in dialysate GABA levels (-16% +/- 4% and -26% +/- 4% of basal values, respectively). The WIN 55,212-2 (5 mg/kg i.p.) induced-inhibition was counteracted by a dose (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) of the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A, which by itself was without effect on cortical GABA levels. These findings suggest that cannabinoids decrease cortical GABA levels in vivo, an action that might underlie some of the cognitive and behavioral effects of acute exposure to marijuana.     

Cannabinoids inhibit hippocampal GABAergic transmission and network oscillations

Using a new antibody developed against the C-terminus of the cannabinoid receptor (CB1), the immunostaining in the hippocampus revealed additional axon terminals relative to the pattern reported previously with an N-terminus antibody. Due to a greater sensitivity of this antibody, a large proportion of boutons in the dendritic layers displaying symmetrical (GABAergic) synapses were also strongly immunoreactive for CB1 receptors, as were axon terminals of perisomatic inhibitory cells containing cholecystokinin. Asymmetrical (glutamatergic) synapses, however, were always negative for CB1. To investigate the effect of presynaptic CB1 receptor activation on hippocampal inhibition, we recorded inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) from principal cells. Bath application of CB1 receptor agonists (WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940) suppressed IPSCs evoked by local electrical stimulation, which could be prevented or reversed by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A. Action potential-driven IPSCs, evoked by pharmacological stimulation of a subset of interneurons, were also decreased by CB1 receptor activation. We also examined the effects of CB1 receptor agonists on Ca2+-independent miniature IPSCs (mIPSC). Both agonists were without significant effect on the frequency or amplitude of mIPSCs. Synchronous gamma oscillations induced by kainic acid in the CA3 region of hippocampal slices were reversibly reduced in amplitude by the CB1 receptor agonist CP 55,940, which is consistent with an action on IPSCs. We used CB1-/- knock-out mice to confirm the specificity of the antibody and of the agonist (WIN55,212-2) action. We conclude that activation of presynaptic CB1 receptors decreases Ca2+-dependent GABA release, and thereby reduces the power of hippocampal network oscillations.     

Gastric antisecretory effects of synthetic cannabinoids after central or peripheral administration in the rat

Previous studies have revealed that cannabinoid (CB)-receptor agonists inhibit gastric acid secretion stimulated by indirectly acting agents, but not by histamine. Aiming to investigate whether central or peripheral mechanisms are involved, the effects of the synthetic CB-receptor agonists WIN55,212-2 and HU-210, administered either intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) or intravenously (i.v.) to the anaesthetized rat with lumen-perfused stomach, against gastric acid secretion induced by pentagastrin were tested. Injected i.c.v., both WIN55,212-2 (50 and 100 microg/kg) and HU-210 (25, 50 and 100 microg/kg) were ineffective on either basal secretion or acid output induced by pentagastrin (7.7 microg/kg, i.v.). By contrast, i.v. injections of WIN55,212-2 (100 and 1000 microg/kg) or HU-210 (10-100 microg/kg) significantly inhibited pentagastrin-induced acid secretion, maximal reductions being 75.70 and 82.24% for WIN55,212-2 and HU-210, respectively. The gastric antisecretory effect of HU-210 was prevented by administration of the selective CB(1)-receptor antagonist SR141716A (1000 microg/kg, i.v.). These results show that CB(1)-receptors mediating inhibition of gastric acid secretion in the rat are mainly peripherally located.     

Cannabinoid modulation of sensitivity to time

The present studies used a psychophysical approach to examine the effect of cannabinoids on temporal processing. Rats trained to discriminate 2- and 8-s (Experiment 1, n=72) and 4- and 16-s (Experiment 2, n=60) intervals were tested with intermediate durations. Psychophysical functions for time, relating the probability of judging a duration as "long" as a function of the actual stimulus durations, were characterized by measures of central tendency (point of subjective equality, PSE) and variability (Weber fraction, WF). The potent cannabinoid agonist, WIN55,212-2 (1-3 mg/kg), produced a dose-related decrease in sensitivity to time (i.e. increase in WF) without systematically affecting PSE (Experiments 1 and 2). The central cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, SR141716A (1-3 mg/kg), did not alter either the WF or PSE (Experiments 1 and 2). Coadministration of SR141716A with WIN55,212-2 blocked the effect of the agonist on WF (Experiment 2), suggesting that the WF effect is mediated by actions at cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Computational modeling with an information processing theory of timing suggests that the reduction in sensitivity to time can be attributed to a disorder of attention.     

Effects of cannabinoids on prefrontal neuronal responses to ventral tegmental area stimulation

Cannabinoids activate the firing of mesoprefrontocortical dopamine neurons and release dopamine in the prefrontal cortex. This study was undertaken with the aim of clarifying the interaction between cannabinoids and mesocortical system in the prefrontal cortex. The effect of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC) and the synthetic CB1 agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) was studied by extracellular single unit recordings, in chloral hydrate anaesthetised rats, on the spontaneous activity of pyramidal neurons and on the inhibition produced on these neurons by the electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Intravenously administered Delta9-THC and WIN (1.0 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively), increased the firing rate of pyramidal neurons projecting to the VTA. VTA stimulation produced a phasic inhibition (167 +/- 6 ms) in 79% of prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons. Delta9-THC and WIN reverted this inhibition in 73% and 100% of the neurons tested, respectively. The subsequent administration of the selective CB1 antagonist SR141716A (1 mg/kg) readily suppressed the effects of both cannabinoids and restored the inhibitory response to VTA stimulation. Moreover, when administered alone, SR141716A prolonged the inhibition in 55.6% of the neurons tested. The results indicate that stimulation of CB1 receptors by cannabinoids results in an enhanced excitability of prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons as indexed by the suppression of the inhibitory effect of VTA stimulation and by the increase in firing rate of antidromically identified neurons projecting to the VTA. Furthermore, our results support the view that endogenous cannabinoids exert a negative control on dopamine activity in the prefrontal cortex. This study may be relevant in helping to understand the influence of cannabinoids on cognitive processes mediated by the prefrontal cortex.     

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A induces penile erection by increasing extra-cellular glutamic acid in the paraventricular nucleus of male rats

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.1, 0.5 and 1 microg) induces penile erection when injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male rats. The pro-erectile effect of SR 141716A occurs concomitantly with an increase in the concentration of glutamic acid in the paraventricular dialysate obtained by means of intra-cerebral microdialysis. Glutamic acid increase and penile erection did not occur when SR 141716A was given after tetrodotoxin, a voltage-dependent Na(+) channel blocker. Both penile erection and glutamic acid increases were also reduced by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists WIN 55,212-2 or HU 210 given into the paraventricular nucleus before SR 141716A at doses unable to induce penile erection or to modify glutamic acid. In contrast, dizocilpine ((+)MK-801), an antagonist of excitatory amino acid receptors of the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) subtype, given into the paraventricular nucleus reduced penile erection, but was ineffective on the glutamic acid increase induced by the CB1 receptor antagonist. 6-Cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) and (+/-)-2-amino-4-phosphono-butanoic acid (AP(4)), antagonists of the excitatory amino acid receptors of the AMPA subtype and of the metabotropic subtype, respectively, were ineffective on both penile erection and glutamic acid increase. SR 141716A responses were also reduced by muscimol, a GABA(A) receptor agonist, but not by baclofen, a GABA(B) receptor agonist, given into the paraventricular nucleus before SR 141716A. The present results show that SR 141716A induces penile erection by activating glutamic acid neurotransmission, which causes in turn the activation of paraventricular oxytocinergic neurons mediating penile erection.