Lack of apparent difference in outcome between clinically staged IIIA and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiation therapy

The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for bronchogenic carcinoma, which divides stage III M0 cases into stages IIIA and IIIB, is based on the observation that selected patients with IIIA disease (T3 or N2) can undergo complete surgical resection, in distinction to IIIB patients (T4 or N3). To understand the value of this system when applied to clinically staged (CS) patients treated with a standard nonoperative approach, the records of patients with squamous cell, large-cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung treated with radiation therapy (RT) at the Fox Chase Cancer Center from 1978 to 1987 were reviewed. Three hundred sixteen patients were identified as having CS III M0 disease treated with single daily fraction RT without chemotherapy or sensitizers. Of these, the distinction between IIIA (166) and IIIB (140) could be made for 306 patients. The median survival time (MST) for all CS III patients was 9.6 months, and the 2-year survival was 17%. No difference was observed in MST between CS IIIA and IIIB patients (9.4 v 9.8 months, P = .78), in 2-year survival (17% v 18%), or in rate of first failure within the RT field (43% v 44%). MSTs for the 157 CS IIIA and IIIB patients with less than 5% weight loss and Zubrod performance status (PS) 0 to 1 were 13.0 and 15.8 months (P = .29), respectively. This lack of difference in outcome for CS IIIA and IIIB patients receiving RT has important implications in the design and stratification of future nonoperative trials for stage III lung cancer.     

Postoperative radiotherapy increases locoregional control of patients with stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the treatment records of 98 patients (58 men and 40 women; median age 61 years, range 31-91) with Stage IIB and Stage IIIA NSCLC who were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at our institution between January 1990 and December 2000. Patients were grouped by treatment (chemotherapy/surgery alone vs. chemotherapy/surgery/RT), by disease stage and nodal classification. The rates of local control (LC), disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 40 had Stage IIB and 58 had Stage IIIA. The clinical disease stage and N stage were significantly greater in those patients who underwent RT than in those who did not; however, no statistically significant differences were identified in the additional characteristics between those receiving and not receiving RT within each stage or nodal group. The overall 5-year actuarial LC rate was 81% in the RT group and 54% in the chemotherapy/surgery-alone group (p = 0.07). Postoperative RT significantly improved the 5-year LC rate in patients with Stage IIIA disease (from 35% to 82%, p = 0.01). Postoperative RT did not significantly improve the 5-year OS rate (30% with RT vs. 49% without) for all patients or for patients with Stage IIIA disease. The disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between the treatment groups. Patients who responded to induction chemotherapy had a significantly greater 5-year OS rate (49%) than did those with stable or progressive disease (22%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Postoperative RT in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery significantly improved LC without improving OS. Significantly improved survival was observed in all patients who responded to induction chemotherapy compared with those with stable or progressive disease.     

A 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to explore the activity and feasibility of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in patients with Stage IIIA N(2) and selected IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1997 to July 2000, 70 chemonaive patients with Stage III NSCLC, median age of 64 years, World Health Organization performance status 0, 1, or 2, and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy entered the study and received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks. After three cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients underwent resection or radiotherapy. RESULTS: Responses were seen in 40 of the 69 assessable patients, for an intent-to treat overall response rate of 57.1% (95% confidence interval, 45-62%), with 4.2% complete response. Response rates were 68 and 35% in patients with Stage IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. The overall pathological CR rate after induction chemotherapy was 3%, with an overall pathological downstaging rate of 20%. Median survival for all patients was 14.5 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 67% (95% CI, 54.3-79.5%). The estimated time to treatment failure was 12.6 months. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the main hematologic toxicity, occurring in 26% of patients, but was not associated with life-threatening bleeding. Febrile neutropenia was rare and other severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is highly active as induction chemotherapy in Stage IIIA N(2) unresectable NSCLC. This suggests a need for a multimodality approach upfront, such as concurrent chemoradiation therapy, particularly in patients with Stage IIIB disease.     

Gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy for patients with unresectable Stage IIIA-bulky N2 and Stage IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: an Italian Lung Cancer Project Observational Study

BACKGROUND: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of one of the newer platinum-based doublets as a neoadjuvant regimen in patients with unresectable Stage IIIA-bulky N2 and Stage IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: From June 1996 to April 2000, 129 consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin, 70 mg/m(2) on Day 2 (GC) of a 21-day treatment cycle, for 4 cycles, as part of a combined-modality approach. RESULTS: After induction chemotherapy, 80 patients (62%; 95% confidence interval, 53.6-70.4%) achieved a partial response, 43 patients (33%) had stable disease, and 6 patients (5%) had disease progression during chemotherapy. Forty patients (31%), were considered resectable and underwent thoracotomy. Complete resectability was obtained in 38 patients (29%), with 2% of patients achieving a pathologic complete response. After surgery, 9 patients with Mountain Classification Stage IIIA NSCLC and 9 patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC received definitive adjuvant radiotherapy. Forty-six of 52 patients with Stage IIIB disease and 24 of 37 patients with Stage IIIA disease who were not considered suitable for surgery received definitive radiotherapy. The median time to disease progression was 11.4 months, the median survival was 19.4 months (range, 1.2-55.2 + months), and the 1-year survival rate was 74%. The lungs (33%) and the brain (21%) were the main sites of recurrence. Major toxicity was comprised of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 34 patients (27%). CONCLUSIONS: GC administered according to a 3-week schedule was a highly active and safe regimen in patients with primary, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC.     

Comparison of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems among patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving hyperfractionated radiation therapy. A report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 83-11.

Since 1973, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has staged and stratified patients in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) protocols according to the RTOG staging system. In 1985, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) revised its lung cancer staging system, with the principle differences from the RTOG system being the staging of involvement of the chest wall and of contralateral mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. To determine if the AJCC system discriminated outcome differently than the RTOG system in a nonoperative series, all 850 evaluable patients treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT) on the RTOG protocol 83-11 were restaged by the AJCC system. There was 67% agreement in patient distribution between the following comparable stages in each system: RTOG Stage II/AJCC Stage II; RTOG Stage III/AJCC Stage IIIA; and RTOG Stage IV/AJCC Stage IIIB. Both systems successfully predicted for survival (P less than 0.001), although the RTOG staging was more discriminating (relative risk ratios, 1.59 versus 1.38). Among the 507 favorable patients (those with less than or equal to 5% weight loss and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 70 to 100), the RTOG staging was also more predictive (P = 0.004 versus P = 0.01). When RTOG Stage III (462 patients) was divided into those without contralateral mediastinal or hilar adenopathy (AJCC Stage II/IIIA) and those with (AJCC Stage IIIB), a significant survival (P = 0.0001) was noted with 2-year survival rates of 26% versus 4%, respectively. When AJCC Stage IIIA (348 patients) was divided into the patients without chest wall invasion (RTOG Stage II/III) and those with (RTOG Stage IV), a difference in 2-year survival of 22% versus 10% was observed (P = 0.002). Although both staging systems independently predict for survival, a fusion of both staging systems is the most discriminating of outcome. Future nonoperative studies in locally advanced NSCLC should stratify for contralateral nodal involvement (per AJCC staging) and chest wall invasion (per RTOG staging).     

Induction chemotherapy employing dose-intense cisplatin with mitomycin and vinblastine (MVP400), followed by thoracic surgery or irradiation, for patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy before surgery or irradiation has improved the survival of patients with Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Encouraged by earlier results with preoperative MVP (cisplatin [120 mg/m(2) or 25 mg/m(2)/week], vinblastine, and mitomycin) for Stage IIIA patients with clinically apparent mediastinal (N2) disease, the authors conducted a Phase II trial of the safety and efficacy of induction MVP400 with the dose intensity of cisplatin doubled from 25 to 50 mg/m(2) per week. METHODS: From October 1992 to March 1996, 37 patients with Stage IIIA (26) or Stage IIIB (11) NSCLC began the MVP400 induction chemotherapy program. Four doses of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)), 7 doses of vinblastine, and 2 doses of mitomycin were given over 9 weeks. Patients received either surgery or irradiation after induction treatment. RESULTS: Overall, the response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 49-81%) with a complete resection rate of 67%. The median survival was 17 months, with 66% of patients alive at 1 year. Complete resection and Stage IIIA involvement were favorable prognostic indicators for survival. No Stage IIIB patients underwent a complete resection. Myelosuppression was the most common side effect. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although high response and complete resection rates were again demonstrated, results with the MVP400 regimen were not improved over those achieved with MVP regimen tested earlier with Stage IIIA (N2) patients. The authors continue to recommend MVP as an induction chemotherapy regimen for clinical trials.     

Curative radiotherapy (RT) using limited RT treatment fields in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer in clinical stage IIIA

We report a prospective phase II study utilizing limited radiotherapy (RT) treatment fields in elderly (greater than or equal to 75 years) patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical stage IIIA. Sixteen good risk pts with histologically confirmed NSCLC in clinical stage IIIA, age greater than or equal to 75 years (yr) (range 75-83; median age 77) were entered in the study. All pts were treated with Limited RT fields (including T and N1-2 usually with a 1.5 cm, radiographic margin) and received a minimum of 54 Gy (range 54-62 Gy, median 60 Gy, dose/fraction 2 Gy/5 dd a week). All pts have been followed-up for a median time of 3.5 years (range 1.75-6.58). Median survival (MS) was 18 months (range 7-52 months). No acute and/or late significant toxicity was recorded. Univariate analysis showed a better survival in pts receiving a radiation dose greater than or equal to 60 Gy, with an MS of 34 vs 14 months (p=0.017) and in pts with Karnofsky Performance Status greater than or equal to 80, with an MS of 34 vs 12 months (p=0.0O2). There are scarce data available on survival in elderly pts with NSCLC in clinical stage IIIA. Pts submitted to 'standard' RT in unresectable NSCLC have a poor median survival time and 5-year survival rates. The results obtained in our pts encourage us to use 'limited' RT in elderly but the results require a phase III study before definitive recommendations can be made.     

Surgery for advanced stage lung cancer

Therapeutic strategy in advanced stage disease remains controversial. Theoretically resectable, Stage IIIa disease includes a high proportion of non-resectable nodal diseases. Overall 5-year survival after surgery remains lower than 15%. Randomized trials comparing the results of surgery alone with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery showed a significant benefit to induction therapy. Currently, Stage IIIb diseases are considered unresectable; nevertheless, selected patients are able to undergo an extended resection after induction treatments. In highly selected cases, a surgical resection can be performed in T4 tumors. Surgical resection must be included in a combined multidisciplinary strategy of treatment, and is proposed only for responders. Resectability criteria have to be defined with clinical trials designed to increase the local control by surgery. Thus, so-called Stage IIIb tumors can be divided in two subcategories: potentially resectable and definitively non-resectable. Some locally advanced, initially unresectable tumors (Stage IIIb) can become operable after induction chemoradiotherapy. The French staging system, based upon prognostic and therapeutic subcategories, splits N2 involvement into two subcategories: mN2 (minimal), found at the thoracotomy; and cN2 (clinical), histologically proven at the pre-treatment staging. T4 tumors are divided in potentially resectable T4(1) (invasion of superior vena cava, carina, lower trachea, left atrium), and definitively non-resectable T4(2) (malignant pleural or pericardial effusion, invasion of oesophagus, and vertebrae). Thus, Stage III can be separated into three subcategories, A, B, and C, instead of the two current substages. Stage IIIA includes T3 N1 M0 and T1-T3mN2M0 tumors. Stage IIIB includes T1-T3cN2M0 and T4(1)N0-N2MO tumors. Stage IIIC includes T4(2)N0-N3M0 and T1-T4(1)N3M0 tumors. In this way, the therapeutic options in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will be clarified with 1) a "primary surgery" subgroup, including Stages I, II, and IIIA, 2) an "induction treatment" subgroup, including Stage IIIB, and 3) a "non-surgical" subgroup, including Stages IIIC and IV.     

High-dose conformal radiotherapy for treatment of stage IIIA/IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: technical issues and results of a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE: We completed a Phase I/II clinical trial (Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center 9603), in which we treated 62 Stage IIIA/IIIB inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with two cycles of induction carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, followed by concurrent weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel with radiation doses escalated from 60 to 74 Gy. The median survival of 24 months, 3-year survival rate of 38%, and the high dose of radiation used justified a critical analysis of the technical and clinical components of this trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1996 and 1999, 62 sequential patients with inoperable Stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC were enrolled and treated with two cycles of induction carboplatin (area under the concentration curve = 6 using the Calvert equation) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)), followed by an escalating radiation dose of 60-74 Gy with concurrent carboplatin weekly (area under the concentration curve = 2) and paclitaxel weekly (45 mg/m(2)). The goals of the trial were to determine whether 74 Gy of radiation could be safely delivered under these circumstances and whether patients could potentially benefit in terms of survival. The radiation treatment plans for all 62 patients were reviewed to determine the prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy tumor volume, as well as the dose-volume histograms of the normal lung and esophagus. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients who entered the trial, 48 completed the entire course of treatment. At last follow-up, 20 patients were alive (crude survival rate 32%). With a median follow-up of 43 months, the median survival was 24 months. The survival rate was 50% at 2 years and 38% at 3 years. Cox regression analysis showed that survival was best predicted by whether the patient had received radiotherapy (finished the trial), performance status, disease stage, and log postchemotherapy tumor volume. The 3-year survival rate for the 48 patients finishing the trial was 45%. Eight patients (13%) suffered locoregional relapse as the only site of failure. Only 1 patient had Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Five patients (8%) had Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis; 40 (65%) had a Grade 1 or 2 esophagitis. Esophageal toxicity could be predicted by the length of esophagus receiving 40 or 60 Gy. CONCLUSION: Radiation doses of 74 Gy, when given under the guidelines of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center 9603, appear to be safe and may possibly contribute to increased survival in patients with inoperable Stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.     

Outcome predictors for 143 patients with superior sulcus tumors treated by multidisciplinary approach at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

PURPOSE: Superior sulcus tumors (SST) of the lung are uncommon and constitute approximately 3% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These tumors cause specific symptoms and signs, and are associated with patterns of failure that differ from those seen for NSCLC tumors in other nonapical locations. Prognostic factors and most effective treatments are controversial. We conducted a retrospective study at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center to identify outcome predictors for patients with SST treated by a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective review of 143 patients without distant metastasis at presentation is a continuation of a previous M. D. Anderson study now updated to 1994. In this study, we examine the 5-year survival rate by pretreatment tumor and patient characteristics and by the treatments received. Strict criteria were used to define SST. Actuarial life-table analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare survival rates. RESULTS: Overall predictors of 5-year survival were weight loss (p < 0.01), supraclavicular fossa (p = 0. 03), or vertebral body (p = 0.05) involvement, stage of the disease (p < 0.01), and surgical treatment (p < 0.01). Five-year survival for patients with Stage IIB disease was 47% compared to 14% for Stage IIIA, and 16% for Stage IIIB. For patients with Stage IIB disease, surgical treatment (p < 0.01) and weight loss (p = 0.01) were significant independent predictors of 5-year survival. Among patients with Stage IIIA disease, the only predictor of survival was Karnofsky performance score (KPS) (p = 0.02). For patients with Stage IIIB disease, the only independent predictor of survival was a right superior sulcus location, which was associated with a worse 5-year survival rate than that for patients with tumors in the left superior sulcus (p = 0.02). More patients with adenocarcinoma than with squamous cell tumors experienced cerebral metastases within 5 years (p < 0.01). Patients without gross residual disease after surgical resection who received postoperative radiation therapy with total doses of 55 to 64 Gy had a 5-year survival rate of 82% as compared with the 5-year survival rate of 56% in patients who received 50 to 54 Gy. Twenty-three patients survived for longer than 3 years. Of these, 4 patients (17%) received radiation therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy without surgical resection. The other 19 patients (83%) had resection combined with radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study confirm the importance of the new staging system, separating T3 N0 M0 (Stage IIB) from Stage IIIA, since there was a significant difference in the 5-year survival (p < 0.01). Interestingly, there was no significant 5-year survival difference between Stage IIIA (N2) and Stage IIIB (T4 or N3). This study also suggests that surgery is an important component of the multidisciplinary approach to patients with SST if their nodes were negative. Disease that is minimally invading surrounding normal structures can be resected followed by radiation therapy in doses of 55 to 64 Gy. Further investigation of treatment strategies combining high-dose radiation therapy (>/=66 Gy) with chemotherapy is indicated for patients with unresectable and/or node-positive (N2) SST.     

Phase II study of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: For locoregionally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become a standard therapy. We conducted a Phase II trial to examine the efficacy and toxicity of adding gemcitabine and vinorelbine induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligibility included inoperable clinical Stage III NSCLC without pleural effusion, ECOG performance status 0-1, and weight loss < or =5%. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2, each given i.v. on Days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. During once-daily thoracic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, total 63 Gy), two cycles of oral etoposide (100 mg on Days 1-5 and 8-12) plus cisplatin (50 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8) were given concurrently 4 weeks apart. RESULTS: Between April 2002 and November 2003, 42 patients were enrolled and 40 were included in response and toxicity evaluation. The median age was 59 years and 13 patients had IIIA and 27 had IIIB; 24 had squamous ca, 12 had adenocarcinoma, and 4 had others. Objective tumor responses were obtained in 29 patients (72.5%), including 18 (45.0%) after induction chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, the median survival time and progression-free survival was 23.2 months and 10.9 months, respectively, with 2-year survival rate of 43.9%. For the patients with supraclavicular nodal involvement, the median survival time was 11.8 months with 2-year survival rate of 16.7%, whereas the corresponding figures were 27.8 months and 52.0%, respectively, for those without supraclavicular nodal involvement. Toxicity of induction chemotherapy was mild and well tolerated. However, concurrent chemoradiotherapy was associated with G3/4 hematologic toxicity in 75.7%, G3 esophagitis in 24.2%, and two treatment-related deaths. There were nonlife-threatening late toxicities in additional 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin showed very promising survival in patients with Stage III NSCLC, especially in those without supraclavicular nodal involvement, which warrants further evaluation.     

A phase II trial of preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a novel preoperative combined-modality regimen in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with clinical stage IIB, IIIA, or IIIB NSCLC received preoperative combined-modality therapy with concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin for 5 consecutive weeks. After this treatment, patients believed to have resectable disease by standard surgical criteria underwent thoracotomy. Patients whose disease remained unresectable after initial therapy received further RT with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin. Of 107 patients entered into this clinical trial, only 20 patients (19%) were considered to have surgically resectable disease at the time of study entry. Ninety-eight patients (92%) completed preoperative combined-modality therapy. Forty-nine patients (46%) underwent thoracotomy and 34 patients had definitive resection. Fourteen patients (13%) had pathologic complete response (pCR). Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) with clinical stage T3 N0 (IIB) tumors had definitive resections, and 33% had pCR. After a median follow-up of 32 months, the 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates for the entire group are 64% and 42%, respectively. Favorable-prognosis subgroups included patients who had definitive resection and patients with clinical stage T3 N0 tumors (2-year survival rates of 67% for both subgroups). Preoperative therapy with RT and weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin showed activity in this patient population; however, disease in the majority of patients with extensive involvement of mediastinal nodes remained unresectable after this treatment. Results in patients who initially had unresectable disease do not appear different than results achieved with concurrent RT/chemotherapy approaches. Postoperative complications associated with this preoperative combined-modality regimen were more frequent than expected with resection alone.     

Results of Trimodality Therapy in Patients With Stage IIIA (N2-Bulky) and Stage IIIB Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThe survival rates for stage IIIA and stage IIIB Non–Small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are extremely poor with single-treatment modalities such as radiation therapy or surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess tolerability, response, surgical resectability, and survival of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy, and then followed by surgery in patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) or stage IIIB NSCLC.Patients and MethodsForty-eight patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) or stage IIIB (T4 N1-2 M0) NSCLC received 2 cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin, mitomycin, and vindesine, subsequent radiation therapy (45 Gy, twice-daily 1.5 Gy) with simultaneous low-dose cisplatin and vindesine, followed by surgery.ResultsForty-five patients completed induction chemoradiation therapy. Thirty-three patients (68.8%) had clinical response to induction treatment. Thirty-nine patients underwent a thoracotomy, with a complete resection rate of 62.5% (30/48). The pathologic response rate was 60% (27/45), with complete pathologic response of 8 patients. The median survival time for the total group of 48 patients was 23 months, with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 41.7% and 31.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that complete resection and pathologic response in surgical specimens were independent predictors of survival (P = .048 and P = .022).ConclusionPreoperative sequence of chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy is an effective approach in patients with stage IIIA (N2-bulky) and IIIB (T4 N1-2 M0) NSCLC. The operation after induction chemoradiation therapy should be performed in carefully selected patients with surgically resectable diseases. The patients who achieved complete resection and with pathologic response of tumor can benefit from surgery following induction chemoradiation therapy.     

Stage III Hodgkin's disease: improved survival with combined modality therapy as compared with radiation therapy alone

This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with pathologically stage IIIA and IIIB Hodgkin's disease treated from April 1969 to December 1982. The median follow-up was 108 months. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy (RT) alone in 54 patients and combined radiation therapy and MOPP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) chemotherapy (CMT) in 66 patients. Stage III patients treated with CMT have an improved actuarial 12-year survival as compared with patients treated with RT alone with MOPP reserved for relapse (80% v 64%; P = .026). The 12-year actuarial freedom from first relapse by treatment for stage III patients is 83% and 40%, respectively (P less than .0001). Improved survivals following combined modality therapy are seen for the following subgroups of stage III patients: stage III2, 66% (CMT) v 44% (total nodal irradiation; TNI), P = .04; stage III1, 97% (CMT) v 73% (TNI), P = .05; stage III mixed cellularity or lymphocyte depletion histology, 94% (CMT) v 65% (TNI), P = .007; and stage III extensive splenic involvement, 77% (CMT) v 58% (TNI), P = .02. These survival differences are not seen in patients with nodular sclerosis or lymphocyte predominance histology or in patients with minimal splenic involvement. These data indicate that the initial use of CMT in stage III Hodgkin's disease results in an improved survival as compared with initial treatment with RT with MOPP reserved for relapse. Patients with limited Stage IIIA disease may still be candidates for radiation therapy alone.     

The role of radiation therapy for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer: Impact of clinical nodal stage on survival

Background From 1976 through 1989, 46 patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without malignant effusion were treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) at Gunma University Hospital. Methods All patients were treated with 10 MV x-rays using antero posterior parallel opposed fields. The total dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy (mean dose; 66 Gy) with once daily standard fractionation. Results The actuarial two and five-year survival rates of the entire group were 22% and 10% respectively with a median survival time (MST) of 10 months. The survival of 18 patients with stage NO-2 disease was significantly better than the 28 patients with stage N3 disease (MST 21 versus 9 months;P<0.05). There were no significant differences in survival based on age and sex. However, there was a borderline difference in survival rates between patients with a performance status of 0–1 and those with a status of 2–3 (P=0.06). Three patients with squamous cell carcinoma were alive after 5 years and were without disease progression. No patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma were free of disease after 5 years. Conclusion These results provide support for the use of definitive RT to manage those patients with limited stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma not extending to N3 stage.     

Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patterns of recurrence when selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data is used in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective Phase I/II study was undertaken on 44 patients with NSCLC without detectable distant metastases on CT and FDG-PET scan, delivering either 61.2 Gy in 34 fractions over 23 days or 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days (1.8 Gy b.i.d. with 8-h interval). Only the primary tumor and the positive mediastinal areas on the pretreatment FDG-PET scan were irradiated. Isolated nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside of the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure. RESULTS: The CT and FDG-PET stage distribution was as follows: Stage I: 8 patients (18%) and 13 patients (29%); Stage II: 6 patients (14%) and 10 patients (23%); Stage IIIA: 15 patients (34%) and 7 patients (16%); Stage IIIB: 15 patients (34%) and 14 patients (32%), respectively. After a median follow-up time of 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-21 months) postradiotherapy, 11 patients (25%) developed a local recurrence. Only 1 patient (crude rate, 2.3%; upper bound of 95% CI, 10.3%), with a Stage II tumor on both CT and PET, developed an isolated nodal failure. The median actuarial overall survival was 21 months (95% CI, 14-28 months), and the median actuarial progression-free survival was 18 months (95% CI, 12-24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with NSCLC results in low isolated nodal failure rates. In the Phase I component of this trial, radiation dose escalation up to 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days is feasible.     

The relevance of the revised version of the international lung cancer staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy

In 1997, the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) introduced a new version of staging for lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of the new UICC staging (1997) among patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy. The status of a total of 1354 inoperable patients postintrathoracic irradiation for NSCLC was retrospectively analyzed. Restaging was performed according to the staging system of the UICC 1997. The median survival (MS) among patients with stage I disease was 12.4 months. In the case of stage IA disease, the MS was 17.6 months, which was significantly better compared to the 11.2 months observed among patients with stage IB disease (P = 0.002). The MS among patients with clinical T2 N1 M0 disease (stage IIB) was 8.0 months. The MS among those with clinical T3 N0 M0 disease (stage IIB) was 8.6 months, which was not statistically different from the group of patients with stage IIIA disease, who had an MS of 7.6 months. The MS among patients with stage IIIB disease was 6.5 months, and among patients with stage IV disease, MS was 4.0 months. It was concluded that in patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with radiotherapy, the distinction between stages IA and IB disease in the new staging system is clinically relevant. There was no significant difference in survival between patients with stage IIB and IIIA disease. The results clearly show that the prognostic significance of a staging system mainly based on surgically treated patients should be analyzed separately before it can be used among patients treated with nonsurgical modalities.     

A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic variables and the postoperative outcome in patients with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) to identify important factors for predicting postresection prognosis. Although it has been reported that mass-forming ICC has a different etiology and biologic features compared with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), patients with ICC have been dealt with clinicopathologically in the same manner as patients with HCC. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent hepatectomy for mass-forming ICC with curative intent between 1981 and 1999 were studied. Fourteen preoperative clinical and diagnostic parameters and 12 postoperative surgicopathologic parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of operative mortality in this patient cohort was 5%, and the overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 68%, 35%, and 29%, respectively, with a median survival of 19.6 months. A multivariate analysis revealed that independent negative prognostic factors were 1) hepatic regional lymph node metastasis, 2) multiple tumor presentation, 3) symptomatic tumor, and 4) the presence of vascular invasion. Using these factors, a new staging system was devised: Stage I disease was defined as a solitary tumor without vascular invasion, Stage II disease was defined as a solitary tumor with vascular invasion, Stage IIIA disease was defined as multiple tumors with or without vascular invasion, Stage IIIB disease was defined as any tumor with regional lymph node metastasis, and Stage IV disease was defined as any tumor with distant metastases. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 3-year survival rate and the median survival for each subgroup were 74% for patients with Stage I disease (median survival is the time when the cumulative survival rate of some patients' group declined to 50%; thus, the median survival could not be calculated in patients with Stage I disease because survival was 74% at the latest follow-up), 48% and 26.2 months for patients with Stage II disease, 18% and 16.8 months for patients with Stage IIIA disease, and 7% and 11.2 months for patients with Stage IIIB disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). None of the patients met the criteria for Stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS: The current results support the use of a new staging system for patients with ICC that is simple and predicts well the differences in survival after patients undergo hepatic resection.     

Evaluation of the TN sub-staging in patients with initially unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated by induction chemotherapy. The European Lung Cancer Working Party

PURPOSE: This study attempted to investigate, in a cohort of patients with clinical stage III initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by the same induction chemotherapy regimen, the prognostic value of clinical T and N sub-groupings in order to validate the current International Staging System (ISS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the eligible patients with stage III NSCLC (428 patients) registered in a clinical trial were included in the study investigating, after three courses of induction chemotherapy, the role, in responders, of chest irradiation in comparison to further chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of mitomycin C, ifosfamide and cisplatin. RESULTS: Patients with ISS 1986 stage IIIA had a significantly better survival than those with stage IIIB (median survival 47 vs 36 weeks; P = 0.01). A RECPAM analysis showed that patients with T1-T2 N3 and T4 N0-1-2 stage had a more similar prognosis to those with stage IIIA. That result leads to define two new sub-groups: stage IIIlalpha (T3-T4 N0-N1; any T N2; T1-T2 N3) and IIIbeta (T3-T4 N3), with a highly significant difference in survival between them (median survival: 45 vs 29 weeks; P < 0.0001).The superiority of that new classification on the ISS documented in our series of stage III patients for discriminating survival and tumour response has to be confirmed on another series in a multivariate context. CONCLUSION: For unresectable NSCLC treated by induction chemotherapy, stage III sub-classification by moving T4 N0-1 and T1-2 N3 tumours from stage IIIB to stage IIIA appeared to better correlate with prognosis. The usefulness of this new sub-division has to be tested in validation studies.     

Prognostic factors for survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy: impact of tumor volume

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of tumor volume on overall survival in patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1997 and February 2003, 71 patients with Stage III NSCLC were treated with radiation therapy of 60 Gy or more. The total target dose was between 60 and 77 Gy (average, 66.3 Gy). Chemotherapy was used in 45 cases. The primary tumor and nodal volume were identified in pretreatment computed tomography scans. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of tumor volume on survival after RT. RESULTS: The overall 2-year survival rate was 23%, with a median survival time of 14 months. The median survival times were 10 months and 19 months with large primary tumor volume more than median volume and smaller primary tumor volume, respectively. At a univariate analysis, the total tumor volume (TTV) (p<0.0003) and the primary tumor volume (p<0.00008) were significant and the nodal volume was not. At multivariate analyses, both the TTV and the primary tumor volume were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The primary tumor volume as well as TTV is a significant prognostic factor on survival in patients with Stage III NSCLC treated with RT and should be recorded in clinical results when the survivals are compared among clinical studies.