A review of current local dose-area product levels for paediatric fluoroscopy in a tertiary referral centre compared with national standards. Why are they so different?

A prospective single centre study has been performed to assess dose-area product (DAP) values in children having fluoroscopic examinations and to revise local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). DAP measurements for 2658 examinations performed in a dedicated fluoroscopy room over a period of 21 months were analysed. Data for the eight most commonly performed examinations (2215 cases) are presented. DAPs (75th centile) for upper gastrointestinal studies and micturating cystograms are substantially lower (by a factor of between x 5 and x 25) than the current national reference doses (NRDs), with some of the median values being 50 times lower. The small DAP values in all examinations demonstrate the substantial reduction in dose and consequent risk that can be achieved when both equipment performance and operator technique are optimized. Whilst we recognize that different institutions will have differing practices, it is important that practitioners are aware of the range of DAPs achievable and that NRDs do not necessarily represent best practice, and may falsely reassure.     

X-ray dose and associated risks from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures

The objectives of this study were to quantify the ionizing radiation exposure to patient and operator during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation and to estimate the risks associated with this exposure. The study consisted of 50 RF ablation procedures, all performed in the same electrophysiology laboratory. Occupational dose to two cardiologists who performed the procedures was measured using film badges and extremity thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). Absorbed dose to the patients' skin was measured using TLDs. Dose-area product (DAP) was also measured. The effective dose to the cardiologists was less than 0.15 mSv per month. The mean equivalent dose to the cardiologists' left hand and forehead was 0.24 mSv and 0.05 mSv, respectively, per RF ablation procedure, which was more than twice the mean dose for the other cardiology procedures carried out in the centre. Yearly occupational dose to the cardiologists was much lower than the relevant statutory dose limits. The mean skin dose, fluoroscopy time and DAP to patients were 0.81 Gy, 67 min and 123 Gycm(2), respectively, with a maximum of 3.2 Gy, 164 minutes and 430 Gycm(2), respectively. Mean effective dose to patients was 17 mSv, from which the excess risk of developing fatal cancer is 0.1%. Six of the patients (12%) received a skin dose above the threshold dose for radiation skin injury (2 Gy), but no skin injuries were reported. Patient skin dose and DAP were closely correlated and this allows DAP to be used to monitor patient skin dose in real-time. DAP levels were locally adopted as diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that provide an indication during a procedure that a patient is at risk of suffering deterministic skin injury.     

Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures

The purpose of the study was to analyse the technical characteristics of a newly installed flat-panel fluoroscopy (FPF) system in an interventional cardiology (IC) department and compare it with an older conventional system. A patient survey was performed to investigate the radiation doses delivered by the X-ray systems. Finally, methods of technique optimization regarding the new digital system were investigated. Dose rates in all fluoroscopic and cine modes were measured and image quality assessed using a dedicated test tool. 200 patients were investigated, half using the conventional and half using the digital FPF system. Patient data collected were: sex, age, weight, height, dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (T) and total number of frames (F). Our results are: (1) Digital FPF system: high contrast resolution (HCR) is not affected by fluoroscopic mode, whereas low contrast resolution (LCR) is slightly decreased in the low mode. (2) The digital FPF system has 2.5 times better HCR than the conventional system, with 5 times lower dose in the fluoroscopy mode. (3) Median values of DAP, T and F, respectively, in coronary angiography (CA) are: 27.7 Gycm(2), 4.1 min and 876 for the digital and 39.3 Gycm(2), 5.3 min and 1600 for the conventional system. Median values for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are: 51.1 Gycm(2), 12.7 min and 1184 for the digital and 44.3 Gycm(2), 7.4 min and 1936 for the conventional system. Digital DAP in CA is reduced by 30%, suggesting that a dose reduction in the FPF system is possible. The results of the study concerning the FPF system lead to the conclusion that the lowest fluoroscopic mode and the lowest frame rate should be used in routine practice.     

不同麻醉方式在小儿动脉导管未闭介入治疗中辐射剂量分析

目的：探讨不同麻醉方式在降低小儿动脉导管未闭(PDA)介入治疗中辐射剂量的影响。方法回顾2011—2014年采用2种麻醉方式接受 PDA 介入治疗的小儿(3~6岁)各25例,分为 A、B 2组,A 组为全麻组(男7例,女18例,平均体质量15.32 kg±2.415 kg),B组为局麻组(男13例,女12例,平均体质量16.40 kg±2.056 kg)。2组患者均由相同术者完成手术,采用 DSA 儿童心血管电影自动曝光模式(ped CARD)、摄影帧数15~30 f/s、非离子型对比剂碘克沙醇320 mg I/mL,记录患儿皮肤表面累积入射剂量(AK)、剂量面积乘积(DAP)和透视时间,并作统计学分析。结果50例患儿均顺利完成手术,统计显示,2组患儿的年龄、体质量及性别差异无统计学意义(年龄：t=1.924,P=0.060;体质量：t=1.703,P=0.095;性别：χ2=3.00,P=0.083);全麻组及局麻组辐射剂量 AK、DAP 及透视时间分别为(0.061±0.025)Gy、(0.094±0.046)Gy;(5.08±2.19)Gy·cm2、(8.41±3.587)Gy·cm2;(3.15±1.16)min、(6.86±3.27)min,差异均有统计学意义(AK：t=3.152,P=0.003;DAP：t=3.957,P=0.000;透视时间：t=5.346,P =0.000),2组在采集序列数及图像数相同的基础上,全麻组辐射剂量明显小于局麻组40%[(1-5.08/8.41)%],手术时间相差约1.17倍[(3.15-6.86)/3.15]。结论辐射剂量大小与麻醉方式有关,采用全麻方式进行小儿 PDA 介入治疗较局麻方式辐射剂量明显降低40%。     

Has the introduction of an advanced practitioner led service had an impact on radiation dose for fluoroscopy guided lumbar punctures? A service review

IntroductionHistorically, procedures requiring fluoroscopic guidance such as myelography; barium and video swallows; and fluoroscopy guided lumbar punctures (LP) have been performed by radiologists with the assistance of radiographers. As the National Health Service (NHS) evolves, more responsibilities are being disseminated to specifically trained radiographers to relieve workload due to a national shortage of radiologists. One step taken by the trust was to train an Advanced Practitioner (AP) in fluoroscopy to perform fluoroscopy guided LPs. Clinical audit and service evaluations are required to ensure there is no impact on patient care as a result of changes in practice. Regardless of occupation, healthcare workers undertaking procedures must ensure the same standards of care for patients. Minimising radiation dose is a duty of all radiological professionals.MethodsThis retrospective review evaluated and compared examinations performed by a group of radiologists and an AP in terms of dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy screening time. A total of 300 X-ray guided LPs doses were reviewed and comparison between the radiation exposure data sets was performed to determine whether there was a significant difference between the two operator groups.ResultsThe study revealed that AP-performed LPs had a statistically significant lower DAP and fluoroscopy time (a mean of 4.21Gycm2 and 0.74min) compared to the radiologist-performed LPs (a mean of 5.72Gycm2 and 0.94min).ConclusionThe review demonstrates that patient dose is not detrimentally affected by the introduction of an advanced practitioner. It establishes that dose and screening time was significantly lower. It also highlights the effectiveness of APs in an evolving radiology department.Implications for practiceThese outcomes propose advanced practitioners in this area of expertise can expand their role from neuroradiographer with no detriment to patient dose. Despite the results, it is recognised that continuous appraisal is required to ensure that competencies are maintained, and high levels of care are sustained.     

Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology

PURPOSE: To set Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in interventional radiology by means of dose area product (DAP) measurements and the grouping of homogeneous procedures, and to quantify the associated errors in the DRL estimates. To evaluate the Mean Effective Doses per single procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interventional radiology procedures were divided into four main groups: neuroradiological, vascular, extravascular and paediatric. Neuroradiological and vascular procedures were further divided into diagnostic and interventional procedures. Starting from DAP and total fluoroscopy time measurements in 1,256 patients, the DRLs were determined for 17 procedures, together with an estimate of their uncertainty. The correlation between fluoroscopy time and DAP was assessed. Mean effective dose estimates were obtained from measured DAP values and from the analysis of the dosimetric data reported in the literature for similar procedures. RESULTS: The main features of DAP distributions are long high-dose tails, indicating asymmetric distributions, together with a large interquartile range. Rounded third-quartile values of DAP distributions showed a large range in the procedures taken into consideration. Values of 147, 198, 338 Gy cm(2)were obtained for supra-aortic angiography, cerebral angiography and embolization. Values of 86-101 and 459-438 Gy cm(2)were obtained for diagnostic and interventional vascular procedures on the lower limbs and on the abdomen, respectively. Values of 25-33 Gy cm(2)were obtained for retrograde cystourethrographies and ERCP, and values of 62-158 Gy cm(2)were obtained for nephrostomy and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. The correlation between total fluoroscopy time and the DAP values was poor. Mean effective dose estimates showed lower values for extravascular procedures (4.8-28.2 mSv), intermediate values for neuroradiological procedures (12.6-32.9 mSv) and higher values for vascular procedures involving the abdomen (36.5-86.8 mSv). DISCUSSION: DAP values were generally higher in vascular than in extravascular procedures. In generally, interventional vascular procedures show higher DAP values than the corresponding diagnostic procedures, with the exception of the abdominal region where the values were similar. Extravascular procedures with percutaneous access show significantly higher DAP values than those with endoscopic access. Total fluoroscopy time is a poor predictor of patient doses in interventional radiology. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic recording of DAP values, together with adequate grouping of similar procedures makes it possible to establish stable DRLs on a local basis and to carry out dosimetric evaluations, although on a statistical rather than individual basis. Patient radiation doses during interventional radiological procedures may be high, particularly when the abdominal region is involved.     

Patient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinations

A new and relatively simple method is presented to distribute total dose-area product (DAP) over a number of projections that model exposure during double contrast barium enema (DCBE) examinations. In addition, hitherto unavailable entrance and effective doses to the physician performing the DCBE examination have been determined. DAP, fluoroscopy time, number of images as well as some patient data were collected for 150 DCBE examinations. For a subset of 50 examinations, the distribution of DAP over 12 hypothetical but representative projections was estimated by measuring the entrance dose in the centre of each of these projections during the complete procedure. Effective dose to the patient was obtained using DAP to effective dose conversion coefficients calculated for each of the 12 projections. Exposure of the worker was quantified by measuring the entrance dose at the forehead, neck, arms, right hand and legs. The sex-averaged effective dose to the patient per examination was 6.4+/-2.1 mSv (mean+/-SD; n=50) and the corresponding DAP was 44+/-22 Gy cm(2). The effective dose to the worker per examination was 0.52 microGy (n=50), whereas the highest entrance dose of 30+/-25 microGy was found for the right arm. The proposed method for deriving the distribution of total DAP over a set of representative projections is much less time consuming than visual observation of patient exposure, whilst accuracy seems acceptable. Entrance and effective doses per examination for workers in DCBE examinations are very low. For a normal workload, doses remain far below the legally established dose limits.     

Reducing dose at barium enema: radiographers do it digitally

It has been previously shown that, whilst radiographers in our hospital can undertake barium enema examinations with the same degree of diagnostic accuracy as consultant radiologists, there was a dose penalty to the patient arising from the use of a restrictive protocol requiring radiographers to take a series of plain radiographs for reporting purposes. For the past 3 years radiographers at this hospital have worked to a new protocol that replaces all routine radiographs with digital spot films. In the present study, dose-area product (DAP) measurements for 801 barium enema examinations performed by consultant radiologists and radiographers, using the revised protocol, were analysed and compared to ascertain whether there were still significant differences in radiation dose to the patient depending on the category of staff performing the examination. All examinations were reported by a consultant radiologist. The radiologists' reports were analysed against the known outcomes to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the examination when carried out by the two categories of staff. This study shows that using a modified protocol, in which digital spot films replace the series of overcouch radiographs for reporting, our radiographers are able to perform barium enemas without dose penalty to the patient, and without compromizing diagnostic accuracy. Means with 95% confidence intervals for DAP in the two groups were 9.8 Gycm(2) (9.4-10.3 Gycm(2)) and 10.7 Gycm(2) (10.2-11.1 Gycm(2)) for radiographers and radiologists, respectively.     

Patient Radiation Dose in Diagnostic and Interventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms: Experience at a Single Center

Objective

To assess patient radiation doses during cerebral angiography and embolization of intracranial aneurysms in a large sample size from a single center.

Materials and Methods

We studied a sample of 439 diagnostic and 149 therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms in 480 patients (331 females, 149 males; median age, 57 years; range, 21-88 years), which were performed in 2012 with a biplane unit. Parameters including fluoroscopic time, dose-area product (DAP), and total angiographic image frames were obtained and analyzed.

Results

Mean fluoroscopic time, total mean DAP, and total image frames were 12.6 minutes, 136.6 ± 44.8 Gy-cm², and 251 ± 49 frames for diagnostic procedures, 52.9 minutes, 226.0 ± 129.2 Gy-cm², and 241 frames for therapeutic procedures, and 52.2 minutes, 334.5 ± 184.6 Gy-cm², and 408 frames for when both procedures were performed during the same session. The third quartiles for diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were 14.0, 61.1, and 66.1 minutes for fluoroscopy time, 154.2, 272.8, and 393.8 Gy-cm² for DAP, and 272, 276, and 535 for numbers of image frames in diagnostic, therapeutic, and both procedures in the same session, respectively. The proportions of fluoroscopy in DAP for the procedures were 11.4%, 50.5%, and 36.1%, respectively, for the three groups. The mean DAP for each 3-dimensional rotational angiographic acquisition was 19.2 ± 3.2 Gy-cm². On average, rotational angiography was used 1.4 ± 0.6 times/session (range, 1-4; n = 580).

Conclusion

Radiation dose in our study as measured by DAP, fluoroscopy time and image frames did not differ significantly from other reported DRL studies for cerebral angiography, and DAP was lower with fewer angiographic image frames for embolization. A national registry of radiation-dose data is a necessary next step to refine the dose reference level.     

Diagnostic reference levels in paediatric fluoroscopy: how does a secondary referral centre compare with 2018 European guidelines?

Objectives:To compare diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in paediatric fluoroscopy at a secondary referral centre with 2018 European guidelines. Secondly, to compare secondary referral centre DRLs for paediatric fluoroscopy examinations not included in European guidelines with 2010 national UK DRLs.Methods:Paediatric fluoroscopy studies were grouped by age (groups: 0, 1, 5, 10, 15 years) for examination type and analysed retrospectively, over a period of 14 years. DRLs were compared with European DRLs (micturating cystourethrograms (MCUs)) and 2010 UK national DRLs (contrast swallows and meals).Results:1,586 studies were performed (49% MCUs; 31% meals; 9% swallows). For all age groups, DRLs for MCUs were lower than European DRLs by up to a factor 58 x (1 year age group: secondary referral centre DRL 12 mGycm² vs European DRL 700 mGycm²). For contrast swallows and meals, 75^th percentile doses were lower than 2010 UK national 25^th percentile doses in all age groups.Conclusion:Maintaining low doses of ionising radiation is particularly important in paediatrics, and our study has found that it is possible to achieve low paediatric fluoroscopy doses in a secondary referral centre setting.Advances in knowledge:Our data may prove useful to other centres and could contribute towards future European DRLs.     

Diagnostic reference levels for thorax X-ray examinations of paediatric patients

Based on the Medical Exposure Directive of the European Commission, 97/43/Euratom, The Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) in Finland has the responsibility for setting national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the most common radiological examinations. Paediatric patients deserve special attention because of the higher radiation risk compared with adults. The purpose of this paper is to present a method that takes into account patient size when setting DRLs in paediatric patients. The overall data consisted of patient doses collected from six hospitals during the years 1994-2001, and new measurements in two hospitals in 2004. In total, there were 700 chest examinations. The method established by the National Radiological Protection Board (UK) for setting DRLs was not considered feasible in Finnish practice. Patient doses correlated exponentially with the projection thickness, which was measured directly for each patient. Since 1 January 2006, paediatric DRLs for conventional chest examinations have been specified in Finland as a DRL curve by using both dose quantities (entrance surface doses (ESD) and dose-area product (DAP)) as a function of patient projection thickness.     

Skin dose alarm levels in cardiac angiography procedures: is a single DAP value sufficient?

Maximum estimated skin doses to patients undergoing coronary angiography procedures were obtained using radiographic slow film and diode dosemeters. Conversion factors of maximum entrance skin dose versus dose-area product (MESD/DAP) for diagnostic (coronary angiography (CA); 20 patients; 2 operators) and interventional procedures (percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA); 10 patients; 1 operator) were 4.3 (mean value of 10 CA; operator A), 3.5 (mean value of 10 CA; operator B) and 9.7 (mean value of 10 PTCA; operator B) mGy(Gycm2)(-1), respectively. The results emphasise a need for both operator- and procedure-specific conversion factors. Compared with a single, global factor for all cardiac procedures and/or operators that is commonly applied today, such a refinement is expected to improve the accuracy in skin dose estimations from these procedures. Consequently, reference DAP values used in the clinic to define patients who could suffer from a radiation induced skin injury following a cardiac procedure, should be defined for each operator/procedure. The film technique was found to be superior to the diode in defining conversion factors in this study, and allowed for a rapid and accurate estimation of MESD for each patient. With appropriate positioning of the diode, a combined film/diode technique has a potential use in the training of new angiography operators. The patient body mass index (BMI) value was a good indicator of the variation in average lung dose (critical organ) between patients. The highest lung dose/DAP value was obtained for normal sized patients (BMI: 19-26), and was close to 1.5 mGy(Gycm2)(-1) with both CA and PTCA procedures.     

A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals

A study of patient doses for barium enema and meal examinations has been carried out for hospitals in the West of Scotland to assess the impact of dose reduction facilities on new X-ray equipment. Dose-area product (DAP) information has been collected on examinations for groups of patients at 20 hospitals and results reviewed together with data on equipment performance measurements. Median DAPs for barium enemas and meals were 15.7 Gy cm(2) and 4.8 Gy cm(2), respectively, and effective doses estimated from the results are 3.5+/-0.7 mSv and 1.5+/-0.5 mSv, respectively. These doses are lower than those reported in earlier studies and in previous surveys in the West of Scotland. The reduction in dose is linked primarily to the low dose facilities available on newer X-ray equipment, such as low dose pulsed fluoroscopy, digital imaging facilities and use of copper filtration. Use of the image intensifier for decubitus images on C-arm units employed for barium enemas also gives a significantly lower dose. Equipment with copper filtration had the lowest doses. The reduction in effective dose will be significantly less than the reduction in DAP for units in which a copper filter is included and the adoption of lower diagnostic reference levels is proposed for units with this facility. It is important that the operators are aware of the low dose imaging options on their equipment in order that techniques can be fully optimized.     

Evaluation of work practices and radiation dose during adult micturating cystourethrography examinations performed using a digital imaging system

A micturating cystourethrography (MCU) examination is a specific radiological procedure that is performed under fluoroscopic screening to visualize the bladder by filling it with contrast material and to evaluate the urethral morphology during voiding. It is necessary to evaluate radiation dose during MCU examination since it involves radiosensitive organs such as the gonads. Radiation dose imparted to 109 patients undergoing MCU examination were measured using a dose-area product (DAP) meter. Patients were categorized into two groups based on whether filling of the bladder with contrast medium was done retrogradely (MCU) or by the suprapubic percutaneous route (SP-MCU). The DAP values to Group A (MCU) and Group B (SP-MCU) patients varied from 0.43 Gycm(2) to 9.26 Gycm(2) and 0.54 Gycm(2) to 9.87 Gycm(2), respectively. Reduction of radiation dose to patients was possible by the use of optimized exposure factors, precise collimation of X-ray beam, use of 0.2 mm copper filters and by acquiring images digitally.     

心血管介入手术中透视时间作为辐射剂量警示指标的可行性研究

目的以心血管介入术后采集空气比释动能(reference air kerma,AK)值和剂量面积乘积(dose-area product,DAP)值数据为依据,分析术中透视时间报警设置作为心血管介入手术辐射剂量的监测和警示工具的可行性。方法回顾性分析2016年11月至2018年1月上海长海医院736例冠状动脉造影术(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉治疗术(PCI)病例,收集术中透视时间、AK和DAP数据资料。德国西门子成像设备分组(Ceiling系统和Biplane系统)和手术类型分组(CAG和PCI),对辐射剂量数据进行比较,以及对心血管介入手术AK和DAP值与透视时间数据采用Spearman检验解析相关性。结果Ceiling和Biplane成像系统中手术透视时间为(8.9±7.8)和(8.6±7.3)min,透视AK均值和DAP均值分别为(472±474)、(510±509)mGy、(4548±4085)和(4255±3781)μGy·m^2,术中总(透视+造影)AK和DAP均值为(703±595)、(733±614)mGy、(6253±4938)和(5681±4432)μGy·m^2。CAG与PCI术中透视时间均值分别为(2.4±0.9)和(15.7±4.9)min。PCI透视辐射剂量(AK和DAP)与术中总辐射剂量比值分别为74%和78%。心血管介入手术中透视时间与AK值(r=0.822)和DAP值(r=0.844)都呈高度相关性(P<0.001)。结论透视采集辐射剂量是心血管介入手术中辐射剂量的主要来源,辐射剂量随透视时间延长而增加,透视时间监测和报警设置在心血管介入临床应用中作为术中辐射防护工具有一定的参考和警示价值。     

Radiation doses for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland: potential diagnostic reference levels

Wide variations in patient dose for the same examinations have been demonstrated by several studies throughout Europe. By investigating patient dose, variations can be acknowledged, causal agents sought and the necessary adjustments made. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) provide a framework with which dose levels from individual hospitals are compared, and when exceeded, corrective actions can be taken where appropriate. This study aimed to establish DRLs for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland. Measurements were recorded using a dose-area product meter in 12 hospitals representing 33% of relevant hospitals. Results demonstrated wide mean hospital dose variation, by up to a factor of 7.8 and 4.2 for barium enema and barium meal examinations, respectively. Minimum and maximum individual patient dose values varied by a factor of 45 for barium enemas and 90 for barium meal examinations. Reasons for dose variations were complex, but major factors for both examinations were fluoroscopy time, secondary radiation grid type and level of filtration. Some examination-specific factors were also noted. DRLs, established using the quantity dose-area product, were calculated to be 47 Gy cm(2) for barium enemas and 17 Gy cm(2) for barium meal examinations. Although the DRL value for barium meals was the same as the reference value established in the UK for that examination in 1996, the barium enema DRL in this study was 45% higher than the relevant UK value.     

An evaluation of paediatric projection radiography in Ireland

PurposeThis study investigated common paediatric radiography examinations in Ireland and analysed any potential for improvement by considering compliance with requirements for justification, the range of doses delivered and potential Diagnostic Reference Levels, and technique approaches that enhance optimisation.MethodReferral information, Dose Area Product (DAP) dose, technique details and patient data were gathered from 568 paediatric examinations performed across several hospitals. The examinations were mobile infant chest (n = 66), chest (n = 266), abdomen (n = 96), lumbar spine (n = 14), full spine (n = 5), pelvis (n = 151) and skull (n = 28). Data were analysed to allow comment on the adequacy of justification, the range of doses being delivered and possible Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), and the potential for optimisation of radiographic technique.Results/conclusionsResults indicate that the principle of justification is generally applied well in paediatric practice.Dose results indicate that age-related doses are generally comparable to published data, although dose variations exist within and between hospitals. Although differences between minimum and maximum DAP values were substantial, differences between the first and third quartile values were rarely greater than a factor of three. With regard to DRLs, age-related, 75th centile DAP values are presented for five paediatric X-ray examinations. While DAP DRLs stated as a function of age are a pragmatic approach to preliminary DRL values, size related DRLs are acknowledged as a better approach and the necessity of objective paediatric patient size measurement is emphasised.With regard to potential for optimisation, small samples limited analysis of factorial influences on DAP. However, trends indicate that objective consideration of kVp and mAs, careful collimation, and matching of exposure to baby weight in neonates and to measured patient depth in children could all contribute to better optimisation. These factors are all within the radiographer's control, thus highlighting the pivotal role of the radiographer in ensuring that the principle of optimisation is attained.     

Radiation exposure to cardiologists performing interventional cardiology procedures

Medical doctors, who practice interventional cardiology, receive a noticeable radiation dose. In this study, we measured the radiation dose to 9 cardiologists during 144 procedures (72 coronary angiographies and 70 percutaneus translumined coronary angioplasties) in two Greek hospitals. Absorbed doses were measured with TLD placed underneath and over the lead apron at the thyroid protective collar. Based on these measurements, the effective dose was calculated using the Niklason method. In addition, dose area product (DAP) was registered. The effective doses, E, were normalised to the total DAP measured in each procedure, producing the E/DAP index. The mean effective dose values were found to be in the range of 1.2-2.7 microSv while the mean E/DAP values are in the range of 0.010-0.035 microSv/Gycm2. The dependence of dose to the X-ray equipment, the exposure parameters and the technique of the cardiologist were examined. Taking under consideration the laboratories' annual workload, the maximum annual dose was estimated to be 1.9 and 2.8 mSv in the two hospitals.     

Reducing Radiation Dose in Pediatric Diagnostic Fluoroscopy

PurposeTo assess radiation dose in common pediatric diagnostic fluoroscopy procedures and determine the efficacy of dose tracking and dose reduction training to reduce radiation use.MethodsFluoroscopy time and radiation dose area product (DAP) were recorded for upper GIs (UGI), voiding cystourethrograms (VCUGs), and barium enemas (BEs) during a six-month period. The results were presented to radiologists followed by a 1-hour training session on radiation dose reduction methods. Data were recorded for an additional six months. DAP was normalized to fluoroscopy time, and Wilcoxon testing was used to assess for differences between groups.ResultsData from 1,479 cases (945 pretraining and 530 post-training) from 9 radiologists were collected. No statistically significant difference was found in patient age, proportion of examination types, or fluoroscopy time between the pre- and post-training groups (P ≥ .1), with the exception of a small decrease in median fluoroscopy time for VCUGs (1.0 vs 0.9 minutes, P = .04). For all examination types, a statistically significant decrease was found in the median normalized DAP (P < .05) between pre- and post-training groups. The median (quartiles) for pretraining and post-training normalized DAPs (μGy·m² per minute) were 14.36 (5.00, 38.95) and 6.67 (2.67, 17.09) for UGIs; 13.00 (5.34, 32.71) and 7.16 (2.73, 19.85) for VCUGs; and 33.14 (9.80, 85.26) and 17.55 (7.96, 46.31) for BEs.ConclusionsRadiation dose tracking with feedback, paired with dose reduction training, can reduce radiation dose during diagnostic pediatric fluoroscopic procedures by nearly 50%.